Knowledge (XXG)

Japan Air Lines Flight 792

Source 📝

385: 27: 1363: 452: 365:
opted to land without ditching the fuel. The copilot testified that, despite the reserve accumulator was showing normal readings, the brakes did not work. Also, the copilot noticed the air bottle's pressure reading was at zero, but failed to notify the pilot. Chinese investigators saw this as problematic. However, many experts stated that such a case of an air bottle rupture has never happened before, arguing that as such, noticing the issue would have been difficult.
320:
right wing became detached, and a fire briefly occurred. According to an unnamed cabin attendant, the airplane was filled with white smoke, and there was panic in the cabin. The cabin attendants were already starting to evacuate the passengers before there was an official order from the cockpit. As a result of the accident, seven people, including the cockpit crew and a cabin attendant, was severely injured. The pilot had broken his
480: 396:. On the day after the incident, the Ministry of Transportation ordered Japan Air Lines to inspect its entire DC-8 fleet. Later, on the 21st, the Ministry of Transport conducted an on-site inspection against the airline, and ordered the airline to conduct X-ray inspections to its fleet. Japan Air Lines conducted inspections on 24 aircraft, some of which were of its subsidiary's fleet, 438: 466: 407:, the Aircraft and Railway Accidents Investigation Commission conducted a meeting on January 24, 1983 to discuss the procedures of evacuation and rescue of passengers in an emergency. The meeting discussed what passengers need to know and follow during the event of an emergency. The aircraft involved in the accident was moved to the 319:
At 2:30PM, Flight 792 landed on Runway 36 at 180 knots (330 km/h). The pilot then attempted to apply the brakes, but as the hydraulics were damaged, both the normal and emergency brakes were unusable. As a result, the aircraft overran the runway for about 150 meters, before hitting a ditch. The
315:
to be rendered nonfunctional. As a result, the oil gauge and oil pressure gauge both dropped to zero. The pilot then switched to a backup hydraulics and began returning to the airport. However, the backup hydraulics were also damaged by the rupture, making the flaps inoperable. The pilot would go on
375:
The final investigation report stated that, had an X-ray inspection had been done on the aircraft, the corroded air bottle would have been noticed, but the maintenance manual for the aircraft did not make any mentions concerning X-ray inspections. On the other hand, the report did not touch on the
364:
Through interrogation, it was revealed that the pilot thought that the emergency brakes were still usable during the accident, as some of the hydraulics were still functioning. The pilot stated that he tried to land the plane as fast as possible before the hydraulics were completely destroyed, and
351:
launched an investigation in to the accident. The investigation committee arrived at the scene on the following day of the accident, but no investigation was conducted as everyone, including those from the Chinese side, were not allowed to be near the accident scene due to fears of fire caused by
356:
and voice recorder was retrieved. Given the condition of the luggages, the theory of a terrorist attack was ruled out. In the early stage of the investigation, it was thought that the hydraulics itself suddenly failed, causing the accident. JA8048 received most of its maintenance at Narita, and
316:
to declare his intention to land without the use of flaps to air traffic controllers. On the other hand, the pilot did not tell the cabin attendants that the plane would be making an emergency landing, but rather that the plane would be returning to the airport due to a minor issue.
310:
The aircraft took off at 1:57PM. Ten minutes later, the air bottle ruptured as the aircraft was ascending while turning to the left, making an explosive sound. The rupture severed 15 pipes, some of which were hydraulics, resulting in the brakes and
372:, became corroded, and ruptured after a crack had formed. There were six cracks present, and the largest crack (1.9 mm in size) developed at a spot that was only 2.3 mm thick. The cause of the crack was theorized to be faulty production. 1676: 1701: 953: 357:
received some brief maintenance at Shanghai, but no check was done on the hydraulic pipes. Also, there were theories pitched by some that the captain, who was in an important position within the airline,
299:
Flight 792 was a regularly scheduled passenger flight from Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport and New Tokyo International Airport. The flight was scheduled to take off from Shanghai at 2PM
1681: 273:
manufactured in 1971, carrying the registration JA8048. The aircraft was bought by Japan Air Lines in March of the same year. In July 1982 the aircraft was sold to Oriental Lease, who in turn
344: 946: 1671: 392:
At the time, Japan Air Lines was involved in a string of major incidents, and Flight 792 was the fourth incident within the previous seven months, the most notable being
1686: 1298: 1292: 939: 1097: 1691: 1473: 1087: 997: 1200: 277:
the aircraft back to Japan Air Lines. The aircraft had undergone an overhaul in June 1982, and had received maintenance just 13 days before the incident.
1565: 368:
On December 6, the investigation committee announced that the cause of the accident was the air bottle for the emergency brakes, which were made out of
1523: 1240: 250: 169: 68: 1646: 1220: 419: 340: 885: 408: 1583: 1577: 284:
before, and was recently appointed the Flight Crew Manager of Japan Air Line's DC-8s as the previous manager was sacked in the fallout of
1329: 1117: 1541: 1529: 1505: 1017: 75: 1571: 963: 352:
leaking oil. Proper investigation was only able to start two days after the accident, and it was on that day that the aircraft's
1696: 1661: 1210: 404: 26: 1067: 348: 291:
104 of the 113 passengers were Japanese, and among them were tourists who were on a tour organized by the Nicchuryokosha.
1057: 415: 254: 1362: 414:
As of 2023, Flight 792 is no longer used by Japan Airlines on the Shanghai route, but instead on the flight connecting
376:
mistakes the pilot made, making it inconclusive as to whether there were any elements of pilot error in this incident.
1656: 1604: 1037: 384: 280:
The captain of Flight 792 was a 57-year-old man with 14,862 hours of experience. He was a veteran that had flown the
1559: 1547: 1535: 1517: 1511: 1499: 1493: 1481: 1137: 1027: 393: 285: 1666: 1651: 1250: 331:
The remaining passengers were placed on a special retrieval flight, and arrived to Narita at 1:30PM on the 18th.
1487: 1609: 1441: 1322: 1007: 565: 281: 1177: 1420: 987: 156: 1047: 1392: 1147: 1127: 1397: 1377: 1260: 1157: 889: 304: 931: 1446: 1387: 1315: 1270: 1230: 864: 397: 312: 561: 1190: 1167: 288:'s accident. The copilot was a 34-year-old man and the flight engineer was a 28-year-old man. 1407: 1280: 1077: 258: 1107: 471: 353: 1352: 1338: 325: 274: 184: 125: 1640: 1625: 1415: 915: 400:, and reported on the 30th that no issues that could lead to an accident were found. 300: 188: 1425: 910: 485: 457: 443: 321: 270: 115: 253:, after reporting an issue in the aircraft's hydraulics soon after taking off for 1451: 479: 358: 433: 369: 90: 77: 1677:
Aviation accidents and incidents caused by design or manufacturing errors
173: 1456: 261:, which in turn led to 39 of the 124 passenger and crew being injured. 423: 1382: 383: 403:
In response to this accident as well as those of Flight 350 and
1311: 935: 388:
JA8048 displayed at the Shanghai Aerospace Enthusiasts Center
1307: 1702:
Aviation accidents and incidents involving runway overruns
249:
made an attempted landing back to its airport of origin,
345:
Aircraft and Railway Accidents Investigation Commission
1618: 1597: 1472: 1465: 1434: 1406: 1370: 1345: 788:「日航上海事故、日中の調査で原因はエアボトルの破裂と判明」『日本経済新聞』1982年10月9日夕刊7頁 235: 227: 219: 211: 203: 195: 180: 165: 155: 147: 139: 131: 121: 111: 106: 64: 56: 41: 36: 1682:Accidents and incidents involving the Douglas DC-8 888:(in Chinese). 上海航宇科普中心. 2017-07-11. Archived from 697:「『一瞬、パニック状態』 日航機事故、帰国乗務員が会見」『毎日新聞』1982年9月20日朝刊23頁 562:"Accident description Japan Air Lines Flight 792" 911:"Flight history for Japan Airlines flight JL792" 815:「小坂運輸相、日航機上海事故で高木社長に厳重注意」『日本経済新聞』1982年9月18日夕刊1頁 1323: 947: 534: 411:, where it is displayed outside to this day. 8: 706:「日航機上海事故、帰国の乗客は恐怖口々に」『日本経済新聞』1982年9月19日朝刊23頁 693: 691: 689: 687: 619: 617: 615: 532: 530: 528: 526: 524: 522: 520: 518: 516: 514: 269:The aircraft involved in the incident was a 19: 1098:British Army Gazelle friendly fire incident 779:「日航機上海事故、原因はエアボトル爆発」『日本経済新聞』1982年9月21日朝刊31頁 770:「日航機上海事故、副操縦士の判断ミス?」『日本経済新聞』1982年9月22日朝刊31頁 656: 654: 652: 650: 644:「『蓄圧器にトラブル』 帰国の副操縦士ら語る」『朝日新聞』1982年9月18日朝刊1頁 589: 587: 585: 583: 581: 504: 502: 500: 498: 496: 1469: 1330: 1316: 1308: 954: 940: 932: 757: 755: 753: 734: 732: 730: 677: 675: 593:「日航機、上海で着陸に失敗しオーバーラン」『読売新聞』1982年9月19日朝刊23頁 361:due to the pressure he was going through. 25: 18: 1672:Aviation accidents and incidents in China 998:Thunderbirds Indian Springs diamond crash 747:「日航機上海事故、爆破の証拠はない」『日本経済新聞』1982年9月19日朝刊23頁 640: 638: 605: 603: 601: 599: 60:Runway excursion due to broken hydraulics 16:1982 aviation incident in Shanghai, China 1687:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1982 859: 857: 715:「油圧系統に照準 事故調査官、上海入り」『毎日新聞』1982年9月18日夕刊9頁 508:「ブレーキ部品の破裂 日中当局が報告書」『毎日新聞』1982年12月6日夕刊6頁 1201:Sukhumi Dranda Airport runway collision 867:(in Japanese). 航空・鉄道事故調査委員会. 1983-01-24 492: 251:Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport 170:Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport 69:Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport 1692:Japan Airlines accidents and incidents 669:「緊急着陸する指示、機長からは出ず」『朝日新聞』1982年9月18日朝刊1頁 420:Daniel K. Inouye International Airport 341:Civil Aviation Administration of China 1241:Bristow Helicopters Bell 212 accident 833:「運輸省、日航立ち入り検査」『日本経済新聞』1982年9月21日夕刊11頁 556: 554: 552: 550: 548: 546: 544: 409:Shanghai Aerospace Enthusiasts Center 7: 851:「事故に通じる不良部分なし」『朝日新聞』1982年10月1日朝刊22頁 681:「『安全管理』どうした日航」『朝日新聞』1982年9月18日朝刊23頁 538:「日航機着陸失敗、土手に激突」『毎日新聞』1982年9月18日朝刊1頁 14: 1221:Aerocondor DHC-4 Caribou accident 842:「DC8 総点検始まる」『朝日新聞』1982年9月19日朝刊23頁 632:「『油圧』意外に要因?」『朝日新聞』1982年9月18日夕刊11頁 303:, and arrive to Narita at 5:55PM 1361: 964:Aviation accidents and incidents 806:「DC8機 総点検せよ」『朝日新聞』1982年9月18日夕刊1頁 623:「また、やった日航機」『毎日新聞』1982年9月18日朝刊23頁 609:「日航機、上海でも事故」『朝日新聞』1982年9月18日朝刊1頁 478: 464: 450: 436: 797:「高圧エアボトル爆発」『朝日新聞』1982年9月21日朝刊1頁 761:「腐食空気筒が破裂」『朝日新聞』1982年12月6日夕刊14頁 724:「飛行中ナゾの爆発音」『朝日新聞』1982年9月19日朝刊1頁 255:New Tokyo International Airport 185:New Tokyo International Airport 1211:Southwest Air Lines Flight 611 1118:TABA Fairchild FH-227 accident 824:「日航立ち入り検査」『朝日新聞』1982年9月21日夕刊1頁 738:「爆発物の線薄れる」『朝日新聞』1982年9月20日朝刊1頁 405:Southwest Air Lines Flight 611 349:Japanese Ministry of Transport 1: 1647:September 1982 events in Asia 1088:RAF Jaguar shootdown incident 1068:Aeropesca Colombia Flight 217 865:"緊急時における航空機搭乗者の脱出及び救難等に関する建議" 660:「上昇中に爆発音」『毎日新聞』1982年9月19日朝刊1頁 1018:Korean Air Force C-123 crash 416:Kansai International Airport 324:while the copilot broke his 257:. The landing resulted in a 45:September 17, 1982 1474:JAL accidents and incidents 1038:Pilgrim Airlines Flight 458 1718: 1138:British Airways Flight 009 1028:Japan Air Lines Flight 350 286:Japan Air Lines Flight 350 247:Japan Air Lines Flight 792 20:Japan Air Lines Flight 792 1359: 1290: 1251:Japan Airlines Flight 792 979: 24: 1610:Safety Promotion Center 1524:Food poisoning incident 1442:Japan Airlines Domestic 1058:Garuda Fokker F28 crash 1008:World Airways Flight 30 566:Aviation Safety Network 245:On September 17, 1982, 886:"场馆介绍 - DC-8-61大型喷气客机" 389: 91:31.19667°N 121.33500°E 1697:Disasters in Shanghai 1662:Transport in Shanghai 1421:Spring Airlines Japan 988:Air Florida Flight 90 387: 1566:Flight 1628 incident 1393:Japan Transocean Air 1148:Aeroflot Flight 8641 1128:Air India Flight 403 1578:Flights 907 and 958 1398:Ryukyu Air Commuter 1378:Hokkaido Air System 1299:►   1983 1293:1981   ◄ 1261:Aeroflot Flight 343 1158:Aeroflot Flight 411 96:31.19667; 121.33500 87: /  21: 1657:Changning District 1447:Japan Asia Airways 1388:Japan Air Commuter 1296:    1271:Aeronor Flight 304 1231:Spantax Flight 995 1048:Widerøe Flight 933 398:Japan Asia Airways 390: 112:Aircraft type 71:, Shanghai, China 1634: 1633: 1593: 1592: 1305: 1304: 1191:Pan Am Flight 830 1168:Pan Am Flight 759 265:Aircraft and crew 243: 242: 1709: 1667:1982 in Shanghai 1652:Minhang District 1605:JAL destinations 1470: 1365: 1332: 1325: 1318: 1309: 1297: 1281:CAAC Flight 2311 1078:CAAC Flight 3303 974: 973: 971: 956: 949: 942: 933: 927: 926: 924: 923: 907: 901: 900: 898: 897: 882: 876: 875: 873: 872: 861: 852: 849: 843: 840: 834: 831: 825: 822: 816: 813: 807: 804: 798: 795: 789: 786: 780: 777: 771: 768: 762: 759: 748: 745: 739: 736: 725: 722: 716: 713: 707: 704: 698: 695: 682: 679: 670: 667: 661: 658: 645: 642: 633: 630: 624: 621: 610: 607: 594: 591: 576: 575: 573: 572: 558: 539: 536: 509: 506: 488: 483: 482: 474: 469: 468: 467: 460: 455: 454: 453: 446: 441: 440: 439: 259:runway excursion 102: 101: 99: 98: 97: 92: 88: 85: 84: 83: 80: 52: 50: 29: 22: 1717: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1708: 1707: 1706: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1630: 1614: 1589: 1461: 1430: 1402: 1366: 1357: 1341: 1336: 1306: 1301: 1295: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1248: 1244: 1243: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1208: 1204: 1203: 1198: 1194: 1193: 1188: 1184: 1183: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1125: 1121: 1120: 1115: 1111: 1110: 1108:VASP Flight 168 1105: 1101: 1100: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1085: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1071: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1015: 1011: 1010: 1005: 1001: 1000: 995: 991: 990: 985: 975: 969: 967: 962: 960: 930: 921: 919: 909: 908: 904: 895: 893: 884: 883: 879: 870: 868: 863: 862: 855: 850: 846: 841: 837: 832: 828: 823: 819: 814: 810: 805: 801: 796: 792: 787: 783: 778: 774: 769: 765: 760: 751: 746: 742: 737: 728: 723: 719: 714: 710: 705: 701: 696: 685: 680: 673: 668: 664: 659: 648: 643: 636: 631: 627: 622: 613: 608: 597: 592: 579: 570: 568: 560: 559: 542: 537: 512: 507: 494: 484: 477: 472:Aviation portal 470: 465: 463: 456: 451: 449: 442: 437: 435: 432: 382: 354:flight recorder 337: 297: 271:Douglas DC-8-61 267: 140:ICAO flight No. 132:IATA flight No. 126:Japan Air Lines 116:Douglas DC-8-61 95: 93: 89: 86: 81: 78: 76: 74: 73: 72: 48: 46: 32: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1715: 1713: 1705: 1704: 1699: 1694: 1689: 1684: 1679: 1674: 1669: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1639: 1638: 1632: 1631: 1629: 1628: 1622: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1613: 1612: 1607: 1601: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1588: 1587: 1581: 1575: 1569: 1563: 1557: 1551: 1545: 1539: 1533: 1527: 1521: 1515: 1509: 1503: 1497: 1491: 1485: 1478: 1476: 1467: 1463: 1462: 1460: 1459: 1454: 1449: 1444: 1438: 1436: 1432: 1431: 1429: 1428: 1423: 1418: 1412: 1410: 1404: 1403: 1401: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1374: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1360: 1358: 1356: 1355: 1353:Japan Airlines 1349: 1347: 1343: 1342: 1337: 1335: 1334: 1327: 1320: 1312: 1303: 1302: 1291: 1288: 1287: 1279: 1276: 1275: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1239: 1236: 1235: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1209: 1206: 1205: 1199: 1196: 1195: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1136: 1133: 1132: 1126: 1123: 1122: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1066: 1063: 1062: 1056: 1053: 1052: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1006: 1003: 1002: 996: 993: 992: 986: 983: 982: 981: 980: 977: 976: 961: 959: 958: 951: 944: 936: 929: 928: 902: 877: 853: 844: 835: 826: 817: 808: 799: 790: 781: 772: 763: 749: 740: 726: 717: 708: 699: 683: 671: 662: 646: 634: 625: 611: 595: 577: 540: 510: 491: 490: 489: 475: 461: 447: 431: 428: 381: 378: 336: 333: 326:thoracic spine 296: 293: 282:Prime Minister 266: 263: 241: 240: 237: 233: 232: 229: 225: 224: 221: 217: 216: 213: 209: 208: 205: 201: 200: 197: 193: 192: 182: 178: 177: 167: 163: 162: 159: 153: 152: 149: 145: 144: 141: 137: 136: 133: 129: 128: 123: 119: 118: 113: 109: 108: 104: 103: 66: 62: 61: 58: 54: 53: 43: 39: 38: 34: 33: 31:JA8048 in 1981 30: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1714: 1703: 1700: 1698: 1695: 1693: 1690: 1688: 1685: 1683: 1680: 1678: 1675: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1650: 1648: 1645: 1644: 1642: 1627: 1626:Kazuo Inamori 1624: 1623: 1621: 1617: 1611: 1608: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1600: 1596: 1585: 1582: 1579: 1576: 1573: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1549: 1546: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1534: 1531: 1528: 1525: 1522: 1519: 1516: 1513: 1510: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1477: 1475: 1471: 1468: 1464: 1458: 1455: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1437: 1433: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1419: 1417: 1416:Jetstar Japan 1414: 1413: 1411: 1409: 1405: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1375: 1373: 1369: 1364: 1354: 1351: 1350: 1348: 1346:International 1344: 1340: 1333: 1328: 1326: 1321: 1319: 1314: 1313: 1310: 1300: 1294: 1289: 1282: 1272: 1262: 1252: 1242: 1232: 1222: 1212: 1202: 1192: 1182: 1180: 1179:Twilight Zone 1169: 1159: 1149: 1139: 1129: 1119: 1109: 1099: 1089: 1079: 1069: 1059: 1049: 1039: 1029: 1019: 1009: 999: 989: 978: 965: 957: 952: 950: 945: 943: 938: 937: 934: 918: 917: 916:Flightradar24 912: 906: 903: 892:on 2018-10-21 891: 887: 881: 878: 866: 860: 858: 854: 848: 845: 839: 836: 830: 827: 821: 818: 812: 809: 803: 800: 794: 791: 785: 782: 776: 773: 767: 764: 758: 756: 754: 750: 744: 741: 735: 733: 731: 727: 721: 718: 712: 709: 703: 700: 694: 692: 690: 688: 684: 678: 676: 672: 666: 663: 657: 655: 653: 651: 647: 641: 639: 635: 629: 626: 620: 618: 616: 612: 606: 604: 602: 600: 596: 590: 588: 586: 584: 582: 578: 567: 563: 557: 555: 553: 551: 549: 547: 545: 541: 535: 533: 531: 529: 527: 525: 523: 521: 519: 517: 515: 511: 505: 503: 501: 499: 497: 493: 487: 481: 476: 473: 462: 459: 448: 445: 434: 429: 427: 425: 421: 417: 412: 410: 406: 401: 399: 395: 386: 379: 377: 373: 371: 366: 362: 360: 359:made an error 355: 350: 346: 342: 335:Investigation 334: 332: 329: 327: 323: 317: 314: 308: 306: 302: 294: 292: 289: 287: 283: 278: 276: 272: 264: 262: 260: 256: 252: 248: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 189:Narita, Chiba 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 166:Flight origin 164: 160: 158: 154: 151:JAPAN AIR 792 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 127: 124: 120: 117: 114: 110: 105: 100: 70: 67: 63: 59: 55: 44: 40: 35: 28: 23: 1553: 1426:Zipair Tokyo 1178: 920:. Retrieved 914: 905: 894:. Retrieved 890:the original 880: 869:. Retrieved 847: 838: 829: 820: 811: 802: 793: 784: 775: 766: 743: 720: 711: 702: 665: 628: 569:. Retrieved 486:1980s portal 458:China portal 444:Japan portal 413: 402: 391: 374: 367: 363: 338: 330: 322:lumbar spine 318: 309: 298: 290: 279: 268: 246: 244: 157:Registration 1530:Flight 1045 1452:JAL Express 181:Destination 94: / 1641:Categories 1584:Flight 516 1572:Flight 46E 1560:Flight 123 1554:Flight 792 1548:Flight 350 1542:Flight 472 1536:Flight 715 1518:Flight 404 1512:Flight 446 1506:Flight 472 1500:Flight 471 1494:Flight 351 1482:Flight 301 922:2023-07-31 896:2023-07-31 871:2023-08-03 571:2023-07-31 430:References 394:Flight 350 370:41xx steel 220:Fatalities 204:Passengers 82:121°20′6″E 79:31°11′48″N 49:1982-09-17 1339:JAL Group 380:Aftermath 236:Survivors 196:Occupants 148:Call sign 1598:Services 1488:Flight 2 1371:Regional 1181:accident 343:and the 295:Incident 228:Injuries 174:Shanghai 122:Operator 107:Aircraft 37:Accident 1466:History 1457:JALways 968: ( 966:in 1982 347:of the 191:, Japan 176:, China 143:JAL 792 57:Summary 47: ( 1619:People 1586:(2024) 1580:(2001) 1574:(1993) 1568:(1986) 1562:(1985) 1556:(1982) 1550:(1982) 1544:(1977) 1538:(1977) 1532:(1977) 1526:(1975) 1520:(1973) 1514:(1972) 1508:(1972) 1502:(1972) 1496:(1970) 1490:(1968) 1484:(1952) 1435:Former 1277:Dec 24 1257:Sep 29 1247:Sep 17 1237:Sep 13 1227:Sep 13 1207:Aug 26 1197:Aug 14 1187:Aug 11 1174:Jul 23 1144:Jun 28 1134:Jun 24 1124:Jun 21 1114:Jun 12 1084:May 25 1074:Apr 26 1064:Mar 26 1054:Mar 20 1044:Mar 11 1034:Feb 21 1004:Jan 23 994:Jan 18 984:Jan 13 424:Hawaii 275:leased 161:JA8048 1383:J-Air 1267:Dec 9 1217:Sep 1 1164:Jul 9 1154:Jul 6 1104:Jun 8 1094:Jun 6 1024:Feb 9 1014:Feb 6 313:flaps 135:JL792 970:1982 418:and 339:The 212:Crew 65:Site 42:Date 1408:LCC 422:in 305:JST 301:CST 239:124 207:113 199:124 1643:: 913:. 856:^ 752:^ 729:^ 686:^ 674:^ 649:^ 637:^ 614:^ 598:^ 580:^ 564:. 543:^ 513:^ 495:^ 426:. 328:. 307:. 231:39 215:11 187:, 172:, 1331:e 1324:t 1317:v 972:) 955:e 948:t 941:v 925:. 899:. 874:. 574:. 223:0 51:)

Index


Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport
31°11′48″N 121°20′6″E / 31.19667°N 121.33500°E / 31.19667; 121.33500
Douglas DC-8-61
Japan Air Lines
Registration
Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport
Shanghai
New Tokyo International Airport
Narita, Chiba
Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport
New Tokyo International Airport
runway excursion
Douglas DC-8-61
leased
Prime Minister
Japan Air Lines Flight 350
CST
JST
flaps
lumbar spine
thoracic spine
Civil Aviation Administration of China
Aircraft and Railway Accidents Investigation Commission
Japanese Ministry of Transport
flight recorder
made an error
41xx steel

Flight 350

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.