561:
742:
42:
311:
rather than its contractual arrangements with the providers of anesthesiological services. In making that analysis, consideration must be given to whether petitioners are selling two separate products that may be tied together, and, if so, whether they have used their market power to force their patients to accept the tying arrangement.
310:
Any inquiry into the validity of a tying arrangement must focus on the market or markets in which the two products are sold, for that is where the anticompetitive forcing has its impact. Thus, in this case, the analysis of the tying issue must focus on the hospital's sale of services to its patients,
162:
The analysis of the tying issue must focus on the hospital's sale of services to its patients, rather than its contractual arrangements with the providers of anesthesiological services. In making that analysis, consideration must be given to whether petitioners are selling two separate products that
297:
In making that analysis, consideration must be given to whether petitioners are selling two separate products that may be tied together, and, if so, whether they have used their market power to force their patients to accept the tying arrangement. It set a permissive precedent in
314:
There is no evidence that the price, quality, or supply or demand for either the "tying product" or the "tied product" has been adversely affected by the exclusive contract, and no showing that the market as a whole has been affected at all by the contract. The case invokes the
807:
484:
398:
336:
145:
83:
294:
issue must focus on the hospital's sale of services to its patients, rather than its contractual arrangements with the providers of anesthesiological services.
842:
802:
812:
477:
822:
378:"No Such Thing as Partial Per se: Why Jefferson Parish v. Hyde Should be Abolished in Favor of a Rule of Reason Standard for Tying Arrangements"
827:
783:
817:
470:
749:
287:
46:
163:
may be tied together, and, if so, whether they have used their market power to force their patients to accept the tying arrangement.
837:
462:
409:
316:
377:
494:
776:
712:
741:
122:
17:
832:
594:
584:
445:
133:
694:
652:
612:
230:
186:
662:
579:
402:
273:
149:
75:
769:
719:
657:
632:
607:
427:
682:
672:
667:
647:
602:
550:
210:
90:
642:
637:
622:
617:
540:
627:
545:
535:
516:
436:
329:
222:
218:
198:
753:
291:
178:
418:
699:
206:
796:
358:
98:
509:
194:
78:
141:
94:
299:
454:
137:
126:
119:
65:
Jefferson Parish
Hospital District No. 2, et al. v. Edwin G. Hyde
571:
527:
130:
466:
41:
559:
359:"Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 (1984)"
757:
333:: Supreme Court case involving hospital in New Orleans
808:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
337:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 466
302:
law, as some viewed tying as always anticompetitive.
247:
Stevens, joined by
Brennan, White, Marshall, Blackmun
681:
593:
570:
526:
267:
259:
251:
243:
238:
167:
156:
111:
106:
70:
60:
53:
34:
290:case in which the Court held the analysis of the
395:Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde
283:Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde
35:Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde
777:
478:
263:O'Connor, joined by Burger, Powell, Rehnquist
18:Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde
8:
353:
351:
319:, a notable piece of antitrust legislation.
784:
770:
485:
471:
463:
116:Hyde v. Jefferson Parish Hosp. Dist. No. 2
31:
97:49; 52 U.S.L.W. 4385; 1984-1 Trade Cas. (
347:
29:1984 United States Supreme Court case
7:
738:
736:
756:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
750:Supreme Court of the United States
493:Municipalities and communities of
47:Supreme Court of the United States
25:
843:United States Supreme Court stubs
803:United States Supreme Court cases
813:United States antitrust case law
740:
40:
405:2 (1984) is available from:
823:1984 in United States case law
1:
317:Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
828:Bundled products or services
748:This article related to the
818:Jefferson Parish, Louisiana
496:Jefferson Parish, Louisiana
288:United States Supreme Court
286:, 466 U.S. 2 (1984), was a
255:Brennan, joined by Marshall
859:
735:
455:Oyez (oral argument audio)
708:
557:
507:
376:Hodgson, Matthew (2019).
272:
172:
161:
39:
838:Healthcare in Louisiana
54:Argued November 2, 1983
564:
187:William J. Brennan Jr.
56:Decided March 27, 1984
563:
274:Sherman Antitrust Act
129:1981); reversed, 686
721:United States portal
89:104 S. Ct. 1551; 80
446:Library of Congress
231:Sandra Day O'Connor
211:Lewis F. Powell Jr.
565:
183:Associate Justices
765:
764:
730:
729:
330:Levy v. Louisiana
279:
278:
219:William Rehnquist
199:Thurgood Marshall
16:(Redirected from
850:
786:
779:
772:
744:
737:
722:
715:
714:Louisiana portal
562:
519:
512:
502:
497:
487:
480:
473:
464:
459:
453:
450:
444:
441:
435:
432:
426:
423:
417:
414:
408:
382:
381:
373:
367:
366:
355:
179:Warren E. Burger
168:Court membership
152:1021 (1983).
44:
43:
32:
21:
858:
857:
853:
852:
851:
849:
848:
847:
793:
792:
791:
790:
733:
731:
726:
720:
713:
704:
686:
684:
677:
589:
566:
560:
555:
522:
517:
510:
503:
500:
495:
491:
457:
451:
448:
442:
439:
433:
430:
424:
421:
415:
412:
406:
390:
385:
375:
374:
370:
357:
356:
349:
345:
325:
308:
223:John P. Stevens
221:
209:
197:
102:
55:
49:
30:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
856:
854:
846:
845:
840:
835:
833:Anesthesiology
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
805:
795:
794:
789:
788:
781:
774:
766:
763:
762:
745:
728:
727:
725:
724:
717:
709:
706:
705:
703:
702:
700:Manila Village
697:
691:
689:
685:unincorporated
679:
678:
676:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
635:
630:
625:
620:
615:
610:
605:
599:
597:
591:
590:
588:
587:
582:
576:
574:
568:
567:
558:
556:
554:
553:
548:
543:
538:
532:
530:
524:
523:
508:
505:
504:
492:
490:
489:
482:
475:
467:
461:
460:
428:Google Scholar
389:
388:External links
386:
384:
383:
380:. p. 315.
368:
346:
344:
341:
340:
339:
334:
324:
321:
307:
304:
277:
276:
270:
269:
265:
264:
261:
257:
256:
253:
249:
248:
245:
241:
240:
236:
235:
234:
233:
207:Harry Blackmun
184:
181:
176:
170:
169:
165:
164:
159:
158:
154:
153:
113:
109:
108:
104:
103:
88:
72:
68:
67:
62:
61:Full case name
58:
57:
51:
50:
45:
37:
36:
28:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
855:
844:
841:
839:
836:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
800:
798:
787:
782:
780:
775:
773:
768:
767:
761:
759:
755:
751:
746:
743:
739:
734:
723:
718:
716:
711:
710:
707:
701:
698:
696:
693:
692:
690:
688:
680:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
634:
631:
629:
626:
624:
621:
619:
616:
614:
611:
609:
606:
604:
601:
600:
598:
596:
592:
586:
583:
581:
578:
577:
575:
573:
569:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
537:
534:
533:
531:
529:
525:
521:
520:
513:
506:
501:United States
498:
488:
483:
481:
476:
474:
469:
468:
465:
456:
447:
438:
429:
420:
411:
410:CourtListener
404:
400:
396:
392:
391:
387:
379:
372:
369:
364:
360:
354:
352:
348:
342:
338:
335:
332:
331:
327:
326:
322:
320:
318:
312:
305:
303:
301:
295:
293:
289:
285:
284:
275:
271:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
239:Case opinions
237:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
182:
180:
177:
175:Chief Justice
174:
173:
171:
166:
160:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
132:
128:
124:
121:
117:
114:
110:
105:
100:
96:
92:
86:
85:
80:
77:
73:
69:
66:
63:
59:
52:
48:
38:
33:
27:
19:
758:expanding it
747:
732:
585:Jean Lafitte
515:
394:
371:
362:
328:
313:
309:
296:
282:
281:
280:
268:Laws applied
226:
214:
202:
190:
115:
107:Case history
82:
64:
26:
695:Crown Point
687:communities
653:River Ridge
613:Bridge City
511:Parish seat
260:Concurrence
252:Concurrence
195:Byron White
144:. granted,
797:Categories
663:Timberlane
580:Grand Isle
363:Justia Law
343:References
101:) ¶ 65,908
95:U.S. LEXIS
658:Terrytown
633:Jefferson
608:Barataria
306:Rationale
300:antitrust
91:L. Ed. 2d
71:Citations
673:Woodmere
668:Waggaman
648:Metairie
603:Avondale
551:Westwego
393:Text of
323:See also
244:Majority
138:5th Cir.
127:E.D. La.
120:F. Supp.
93:2; 1984
643:Marrero
638:Lafitte
623:Estelle
618:Elmwood
541:Harahan
419:Findlaw
157:Holding
140:1982);
628:Harvey
546:Kenner
536:Gretna
528:Cities
518:Gretna
458:
452:
449:
443:
440:
437:Justia
434:
431:
425:
422:
416:
413:
407:
229:
227:·
225:
217:
215:·
213:
205:
203:·
201:
193:
191:·
189:
118:, 513
752:is a
683:Other
572:Towns
401:
292:tying
148:
112:Prior
754:stub
595:CDPs
403:U.S.
150:U.S.
142:cert
131:F.2d
84:more
76:U.S.
74:466
399:466
146:460
134:286
123:532
99:CCH
799::
514::
499:,
397:,
361:.
350:^
785:e
778:t
771:v
760:.
486:e
479:t
472:v
365:.
136:(
125:(
87:)
81:(
79:2
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.