Knowledge

Jehoash Inscription

Source ๐Ÿ“

66: 573:, commenting on the various scholarly analyses of the tablet and its inscription. Greenstein, a Semitic philologist, contends that the inscription contains "anomaliesโ€”spellings and linguistic usages that did not jibe with what we know of ancient Hebrew writing and language." He also quotes paleographer Christopher Rollston for the assertion that the relative height of some letters is incorrect. Greenstein concludes: 128: 189: 25: 497:
presently no longer existing on the ossuary and have been totally eliminated for reasons unknown. 5) The pictures further document recent (2005) addition of a reddish sticky or powdery and also rock staining material. In places also scratches and dark (black) material was recently added. These materials do not exist in photographic documents prior to 2005.
543:
In order to remove any possible doubt concerning my position as regards the authenticity of the YI, I wish to emphasize at the outset that I do not know whether or not this inscription is genuine. I do contend, however, that it can not be proven philologically to be a modern-day forgery. I would also
565:
In mid-2013, after judge Aaron Farkash of the Jerusalem District Court ruled that the state had failed to prove the artefact was a forgery, the state applied to the Supreme Court to obtain an official requiring the owner of the artefact, Golan, to consign it to the State without payment. The Supreme
452:
but had not originally disclosed to them. There the police found scores of artifacts, ancient seals and other inscriptions in various stages of production along with the tools to create the imitations. Under harsh questioning, Golan admitted that he knew about the Jehoash Inscription and promised to
561:
In a review article published in 2012, Rosenfeld, Feldman, Kronfeld and Krumbein summarized their earlier published studies and reviewed the expert testimony given at the trial of Oded Golan. They supported the judge's conclusion that the forgery of the artifact could not be proved, and stated that
557:
Prof. Ronny Reich who played a key role in the widely publicized case of the antiquities collector accused of fraud, and was one of the founders of the Israel Antiquities Authority stated "Finally, allow me to play devil's advocate and say that the inscription appears to me to be authentic, because
496:
The grainy whitish patina with yellow and grey particles embedded existing prior to 2005 and documented by the Israel Antiquities Authority as "James Bond" material looks like Meyer cement used around 1900โ€“1920 at the Acropolis Monuments in Athens and other places. Unfortunately these materials are
553:
could be a later copy of an original inscription... We do indeed have a reference to a possible renovation or restoration of an inscription. The author of the Tell Fakhriyah Assyrian-Aramaic bilingual inscription, dated to the mid-ninth century B.C.E., speaks of a possible future renovation of his
577:
The judge, overwhelmed by the diverse testimony, was inconclusive. However, the judgment of scholars who read ancient texts and analyze their language and writing is clear: no textbook of ancient Hebrew inscriptions will ever include the so-called Jehoash text; no historian of ancient Israel will
501:
Krumbein concludes that "Our preliminary investigations cannot prove the authenticity of the three objects beyond any doubt. Doubtlessly the patina is continuous in many places throughout surface and lettering grooves in the case of ossuary and tablet. On the other hand a proof of forgery is not
479:
and areas further west. Patina over the chiseled letters was different from that of the back of the stone and could easily be wiped off the stone by hand. In a press conference in Jerusalem on June 18, 2003 the Israel Antiquities Authority commission declared the inscription a modern forgery.
456:
On March 14, 2012 Jerusalem Judge Aharon Farkash stated "that there is no evidence that any of the major artifacts were forged, and that the prosecution failed to prove their accusations beyond a reasonable doubt." However, the court also ruled that it was unable to conclude that the Jehoash
444:
for Golan's apartment, office and rented warehouse. The search brought forth allegedly incriminating documents and photographs of Golan beside the Jehoash Inscription. Under interrogation, Golan promised to reveal the location of the stone in exchange for immunity from prosecution.
558:
it's hard for me to believe that a forger (or group of forgers) could be so knowledgeable in all aspects of the inscription โˆ’ that is, the physical, paleographic, linguistic and biblical ones โˆ’ that they could produce such an object."
414:
reported that the Israel Antiquities Authority Theft Unit had focused their attention on the "Jehoash Inscription" as expensive bait to defraud a prominent collector in London. Israeli investigators linked a phony
427:(another artifact of uncertain authenticity). Golan denied that he was the owner of the stone and claimed that the real owner was a Palestinian antiquities dealer who lived in an area under 549:
Victor Sasson responds that "the sandstone inscription need not be the first and original record. If the stone itself cannot scientifically be dated to late ninth century B.C.E., then the
541:
wrote, "both the nature of these contributions and the fact that they are completely new do support my long-standing position concerning the authenticity of the YI as follows:
475:
The commission concluded that various mistakes in the spelling and the mixture of different alphabets indicated that this was a modern forgery. The stone was typical of western
578:
ever count the inscription as a source; no grammarian or lexicographer of ancient Hebrew will ever include words, phrases, or forms found in the inscription as genuine data.
514:, who had theorized that the books of the Kings could be based on public inscriptions, opined that a forger could have used his (Na'aman's) theory as a basis for a forgery. 952:
magazine was not accepted by that magazine (letter date, October 2003). It was eventually published in the listhost.uchicago.edu in early March 2004. The letter is also in
884: 199: 865: 593: 766:
Cohen, Chaim (Sep 2007). "Biblical Hebrew Philology In The Light Of Research On The New Yeho'ash Royal Building Inscription". In Lubetski, Meir (ed.).
1031: 1011: 971: 1026: 986: 936: 777: 703: 1006: 38: 647: 566:
Court ruled against the Israel Antiquities Authority, returning the tablet and ossuary to Golan, who intends to publicly display both.
754: 246: 228: 170: 109: 87: 52: 945:
Sasson, Victor. King Jehoash and the Mystery of the Temple of Solomon Inscription. iUniverse, Paperback, 240 pages, March 28, 2008.
834: 767: 137: 1021: 717: 457:
Inscription was authentic and noted that an associate of the accused forgers had confessed to aiding in its fabrication.
295: 682: 677: 628: 896: 976: 544:
add that if nevertheless the YI does turn out to be a forgery, then it is a most brilliant forgery in my opinion.
210: 80: 74: 44: 468:, Israeli Minister of Culture, appointed a scientific commission to study the Jehoash tablet, as well as the 1016: 980: 569:
In February 2016, Professor Ed Greenstein, Bar-Ilan University, Israel, published an update review article,
489: 598: 141: 91: 929:
Puzzling Out the Past: Studies in Northwest Semitic Languages and Literatures in Honor of Bruce Zuckerman
1036: 538: 428: 798:
Sasson, Victor. Philological and Textual Observations on the Controversial King Jehoash Inscription,
588: 755:
https://web.archive.org/web/20060825044334/http://www.bib-arch.org/bswbOOossuary_Krumbeinreport.pdf
527: 263:
is the name of a controversial artifact claimed to have been discovered in a construction site or
721: 523: 519: 925:"Methodological Principles in Determining That the So-Called Jehoash Inscription is Inauthentic" 948:
Sasson, Victor. A response to N.A. Silberman and Y. Goren's article in the form of a letter to
488:
A report, dated September 2005, was prepared by Wolfgang E. Krumbein of the Carl von Ossietzky
411: 932: 773: 726: 515: 924: 812: 651: 562:
the trial evidence confirmed their own earlier conclusion that it is most probably genuine.
511: 283: 279: 738: 992:
The So-Called โ€˜Jehoash Inscriptionโ€™: Transcription and Bibliography, by Giuseppe Regalzi
851: 673: 441: 1000: 966: 469: 424: 416: 718:
Antiquities dealer acquitted of forging inscription on burial box of Jesus's brother
866:"After Supreme Court ruling, collector Oded Golan poised to reclaim Jehoash Tablet" 465: 268: 152: 294:, which in turn, strengthens the assertion that the inscription is authentic, the 531: 419:
and a phone number to a Tel Aviv private eye who admitted that his employer was
148: 448:
Police then conducted a new search in a storage space that Golan had rented in
616: 420: 991: 449: 272: 287: 502:
given by the experts nominated by the Israel Antiquities Authority."
476: 405: 291: 278:
The inscription describes repairs made to the temple in Jerusalem by
264: 704:"Breaking News: Golan and Deutsch Acquitted of All Forgery Charges" 530:
demonstrated how the convincing fake could be produced by abrasive
954:
King Jehoash and the Mystery of the Temple of Solomon Inscription,
927:. In Lundberg, Marilyn J.; Fine, Steven; Pitard, Wayne T. (eds.). 833:
Amnon Rosenfeld; Howard Feldman; Yoel Kronfeld; Wolfgang Kumbein.
772:. Hebrew Bible Monographs, 8. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press. 912:
Neil Asher Silberman and Yuval Goren, "Faking Biblical History",
919:
Jonathon Gatehouse, "Cashbox", 'Maclean's' magazine, March 2005
310: 182: 121: 59: 18: 290:
chapter 12. While some scholars support the antiquity of the
972:
Museum deems sole First Temple relic a fake (Jerusalem Post)
298:
has asserted that the inscription is a modern-day forgery.
987:
Archaeometric analysis of the โ€œJehoash Inscriptionโ€ tablet
769:
New Seals And Inscriptions, Hebrew, Idumean, And Cuneiform
537:
In an article published in 2007, Professor Chaim Cohen of
206: 371:
de the repair of the Temple, and of the encircling wa-
435: 403: 835:"The Jehoash Inscription Table โ€” After the verdict" 885:"The So-Called Jehoash Inscription: A Post Mortem" 522:noted various errors in spelling and terminology. 852:Court rules state canโ€™t prove Jehoash Tablet fake 373:lls, and the storied structure, and the lattice- 571:The So-Called Jehoash Inscription: A Post Mortem 575: 494: 377:cesses, and the doors. And this day will become 739:Mixed ruling on major antiquities forgery case 359:osity was full in the land and in the wilder- 196:The examples and perspective in this article 8: 594:List of inscriptions in biblical archaeology 381:May Yahweh ordain His people with blessing. 650:. Associazione Orientalisti. Archived from 53:Learn how and when to remove these messages 363:give money as sacred donations abundantly, 151:. Please do not remove this message until 802:Vol. 35 (for 2003 but published in 2004). 247:Learn how and when to remove this message 229:Learn how and when to remove this message 171:Learn how and when to remove this message 110:Learn how and when to remove this message 967:Israel antiquities forgers charged (BBC) 744:March 14, 2012. accessed August 31, 2012 361:ness, and in all the cities of Judah, to 147:Relevant discussion may be found on the 73:This article includes a list of general 828: 826: 646:Regalzi, Giuseppe (February 28, 2010). 609: 461:Israel Antiquities Authority commission 379:a testimony that the work will prosper. 355:dah, and I performed the work on thus- 678:"What About the Jehoash Inscription?" 648:"The So-Called 'Jehoash Inscription'" 375:s, and the spiral stairs, and the re- 286:, and corresponds to the account in 7: 534:. The stone itself remained hidden. 440:reported that a court had issued a 367:wood and Edomite copper, performing 629:"Report: Jehoash Tablet is a Fake" 200:include all significant viewpoints 79:it lacks sufficient corresponding 14: 369:the work in good faithโ€“then I ma- 34:This article has multiple issues. 916:magazine, September/October 2003 883:Greenstein, Ed (February 2016). 187: 126: 64: 23: 1032:Inscriptions of disputed origin 1012:2003 archaeological discoveries 42:or discuss these issues on the 983:TV science documentary (2004). 979:Summary and transcript of BBC 977:King Solomon's Tablet of Stone 923:Greenstein, Edward L. (2012). 423:, the collector who owned the 345:ื™ืฆื• . ื™ื”ื•ื” . ืืช . ืขืžื• . ื‘ื‘ืจื›ื” 1: 434:A March 19, 2003, article in 431:and could not be identified. 1027:Hebrew inscription forgeries 296:Israel Antiquities Authority 1007:9th-century BC inscriptions 889:The Ancient Near East Today 854:at Haaretz, 10 August 2013. 683:Biblical Archaeology Review 436: 404: 153:conditions to do so are met 1053: 325:ื‘ืจ . ื•ื‘ื›ืœ . ืขืจื™ . ื™ื”ื“ื” . ืœ 931:. BRILL. pp. 83โ€“92. 343:ืœืขื“ืช . ื›ื™ . ืชืฆืœื— . ื”ืžืœืื›ื” 335:ืืช . ื‘ื“ืง . ื”ื‘ื™ืช . ื•ื”ืงืจืช ืก 331:ืฉื . ื•ื ื—ืฉืช . ืื“ืž . ืœืขืฉืช . 327:ืชืช ยท ื›ืกืฃ ยท ื”ืงื“ืฉื ยท ืœืจื‘ ยท 314: 365:to buy stone and juniper 339:ื . ื•ื”ืœื•ืœื . ื•ื”ื’ืจืขืช . ื•ื” 329:ืœืงื ืช ยท ืื‘ืŸ ยท ืžื—ืฆื‘ ยท ื•ื‘ืจ 323:ื‘ืช . ืœื‘ ืืฉ . ื‘ืืจืฅ . ื•ื‘ืžื“ 753:See his full report at 490:University of Oldenburg 341:ื“ืœืชืช . ื•ื”ื™ื” . ื”ื™ื . ื”ื–ื” 337:ื‘ื‘ . ื•ืืช . ื”ื™ืฆืข . ื•ื”ืฉื‘ื› 302:Text of the inscription 94:more precise citations. 599:Archaeological forgery 580: 499: 484:External expert report 388:โ€”Original Hebrew text 350: 16:Archaeological forgery 1022:Forgery controversies 539:Ben Gurion University 429:Palestinian Authority 391:โ€”English translation 333:ื‘ืžืœืื›ื” . ื‘ืืžื ื” . ื•ืืขืฉ 321:ื” . ื›ืืฉืจ . ื ืžืœืื” . ื ื“ 729:accessed May 9, 2012 589:Biblical archaeology 398:Police investigation 357:e. When men's gener- 319:ื”ื“ื” . ื•ืืขืฉ . ืืช . ื”ื‘ 895:(2). Archived from 528:Tel-Aviv University 261:Jehoash Inscription 207:improve the article 140:of this article is 870:The Jerusalem Post 800:Ugarit Forschungen 742:The Jerusalem Post 722:The Jerusalem Post 520:Harvard University 510:Israeli historian 267:cemetery near the 938:978-90-04-22716-3 864:Kalman, Matthew. 779:978-1-905048-35-9 727:HighBeam Research 506:Scholarly opinion 402:Israeli magazine 395: 394: 257: 256: 249: 239: 238: 231: 211:discuss the issue 181: 180: 173: 120: 119: 112: 57: 1044: 942: 901: 900: 880: 874: 873: 861: 855: 848: 842: 841: 839: 830: 821: 820: 809: 803: 796: 790: 789: 787: 786: 763: 757: 751: 745: 736: 730: 725:March 15, 2012. 714: 708: 707: 700: 694: 693: 691: 690: 670: 664: 663: 661: 659: 654:on July 21, 2012 643: 637: 636: 625: 619: 614: 439: 409: 311: 284:Ahaziah of Judah 252: 245: 234: 227: 223: 220: 214: 191: 190: 183: 176: 169: 165: 162: 156: 130: 129: 122: 115: 108: 104: 101: 95: 90:this article by 81:inline citations 68: 67: 60: 49: 27: 26: 19: 1052: 1051: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1043: 1042: 1041: 997: 996: 963: 956:pp. 90โ€“92. 939: 922: 909: 904: 882: 881: 877: 863: 862: 858: 849: 845: 837: 832: 831: 824: 811: 810: 806: 797: 793: 784: 782: 780: 765: 764: 760: 752: 748: 737: 733: 715: 711: 702: 701: 697: 688: 686: 674:Shanks, Hershel 672: 671: 667: 657: 655: 645: 644: 640: 627: 626: 622: 615: 611: 607: 585: 508: 486: 463: 400: 383: 380: 378: 376: 374: 372: 370: 368: 366: 364: 362: 360: 358: 356: 354: 352: 347: 344: 342: 340: 338: 336: 334: 332: 330: 328: 326: 324: 322: 320: 318: 316: 309: 304: 253: 242: 241: 240: 235: 224: 218: 215: 204: 192: 188: 177: 166: 160: 157: 146: 131: 127: 116: 105: 99: 96: 86:Please help to 85: 69: 65: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1050: 1048: 1040: 1039: 1034: 1029: 1024: 1019: 1017:2003 in Israel 1014: 1009: 999: 998: 995: 994: 989: 984: 974: 969: 962: 961:External links 959: 958: 957: 946: 943: 937: 920: 917: 908: 905: 903: 902: 899:on 2022-09-21. 875: 856: 843: 822: 804: 791: 778: 758: 746: 731: 709: 695: 665: 638: 620: 608: 606: 603: 602: 601: 596: 591: 584: 581: 554:inscription." 552: 507: 504: 485: 482: 462: 459: 453:hand it over. 442:search warrant 410:correspondent 399: 396: 393: 392: 389: 385: 384: 348: 308: 305: 303: 300: 282:, son of King 255: 254: 237: 236: 219:September 2012 195: 193: 186: 179: 178: 161:September 2012 134: 132: 125: 118: 117: 72: 70: 63: 58: 32: 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1049: 1038: 1035: 1033: 1030: 1028: 1025: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1015: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1002: 993: 990: 988: 985: 982: 978: 975: 973: 970: 968: 965: 964: 960: 955: 951: 947: 944: 940: 934: 930: 926: 921: 918: 915: 911: 910: 906: 898: 894: 890: 886: 879: 876: 871: 867: 860: 857: 853: 847: 844: 836: 829: 827: 823: 819:. 2012-03-29. 818: 814: 808: 805: 801: 795: 792: 781: 775: 771: 770: 762: 759: 756: 750: 747: 743: 740: 735: 732: 728: 724: 723: 719: 713: 710: 706:. 2012-03-14. 705: 699: 696: 685: 684: 679: 675: 669: 666: 658:September 16, 653: 649: 642: 639: 635:. 2003-06-10. 634: 630: 624: 621: 618: 613: 610: 604: 600: 597: 595: 592: 590: 587: 586: 582: 579: 574: 572: 567: 563: 559: 555: 550: 547: 545: 540: 535: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 512:Nadav Na'aman 505: 503: 498: 493: 491: 483: 481: 478: 473: 471: 470:James Ossuary 467: 460: 458: 454: 451: 446: 443: 438: 432: 430: 426: 425:James Ossuary 422: 418: 417:business card 413: 408: 407: 397: 390: 387: 386: 382: 349: 346: 313: 312: 306: 301: 299: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 276: 274: 270: 266: 262: 251: 248: 233: 230: 222: 212: 208: 202: 201: 194: 185: 184: 175: 172: 164: 154: 150: 144: 143: 139: 133: 124: 123: 114: 111: 103: 100:February 2008 93: 89: 83: 82: 76: 71: 62: 61: 56: 54: 47: 46: 41: 40: 35: 30: 21: 20: 1037:Temple Mount 953: 949: 928: 913: 897:the original 892: 888: 878: 869: 859: 850:Nir Hasson, 846: 816: 813:"Faking It?" 807: 799: 794: 783:. Retrieved 768: 761: 749: 741: 734: 720: 712: 698: 687:. Retrieved 681: 668: 656:. Retrieved 652:the original 641: 632: 623: 612: 576: 570: 568: 564: 560: 556: 548: 542: 536: 509: 500: 495: 487: 474: 466:Limor Livnat 464: 455: 447: 433: 401: 351: 315: 277: 269:Temple Mount 260: 258: 243: 225: 216: 197: 167: 158: 136: 106: 97: 78: 50: 43: 37: 36:Please help 33: 950:Archaeology 532:airbrushing 524:Yuval Goren 516:Frank Cross 492:, Germany: 92:introducing 1001:Categories 914:Archeology 785:2024-02-07 689:2023-10-09 617:2 Kings 12 605:References 421:Oded Golan 353:-haziah, k 317:ื—ื–ื™ื”ื• . ืž[ 307:The tablet 275:in 2001. 138:neutrality 75:references 39:improve it 450:Ramat Gan 412:Boaz Gaon 273:Jerusalem 149:talk page 45:talk page 716:Reuters 583:See also 198:may not 142:disputed 981:Horizon 907:Sources 817:Haaretz 633:Haaretz 288:2 Kings 280:Jehoash 205:Please 88:improve 935:  776:  477:Cyprus 437:Maariv 406:Maariv 292:patina 265:Muslim 77:, but 838:(PDF) 933:ISBN 774:ISBN 660:2012 551:text 259:The 135:The 526:of 518:of 271:of 209:or 1003:: 891:. 887:. 868:. 825:^ 815:. 680:. 676:. 631:. 546:" 472:. 48:. 941:. 893:4 872:. 840:. 788:. 692:. 662:. 250:) 244:( 232:) 226:( 221:) 217:( 213:. 203:. 174:) 168:( 163:) 159:( 155:. 145:. 113:) 107:( 102:) 98:( 84:. 55:) 51:(

Index

improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages
references
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message
neutrality
disputed
talk page
conditions to do so are met
Learn how and when to remove this message
include all significant viewpoints
improve the article
discuss the issue
Learn how and when to remove this message
Learn how and when to remove this message
Muslim
Temple Mount
Jerusalem
Jehoash
Ahaziah of Judah
2 Kings
patina
Israel Antiquities Authority
Maariv
Boaz Gaon
business card
Oded Golan

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘