Knowledge (XXG)

Johnson v. Zerbst

Source 📝

31: 414: 291:
waived, the assistance of counsel is no longer a necessary element of the court's jurisdiction to proceed to conviction and sentence. If the accused, however, is not represented by counsel and has not competently and intelligently waived his constitutional right, the Sixth Amendment stands as a jurisdictional bar to a valid conviction and sentence depriving him of his life or his liberty.
295:
This set the precedent that defendants have the right to be represented by an attorney unless they waive their right to counsel knowing full well the potential consequences. This precedent, however, only made this right applicable to federal defendants and did not extend to defendants in trials under
290:
Since the Sixth Amendment constitutionally entitles one charged with crime to the assistance of counsel, compliance with this constitutional mandate is an essential jurisdictional prerequisite to a federal court's authority to deprive an accused of his life or liberty. When this right is properly
281:
agreed to hear the case and overturned the decisions of the lower courts. In a six to two decision, the Court held that the federal court had infringed upon Johnson's life and liberty by not giving him counsel to defend him during trial. In the majority opinion written by Justice
117:
Since the Sixth Amendment constitutionally entitles one charged with crime to the assistance of counsel, compliance with this constitutional mandate is an essential jurisdictional prerequisite to a federal court's authority to deprive an accused of his life or
1859: 1869: 431: 389: 334: 311: 72: 535: 255: 1786: 1864: 1820: 526: 1874: 1627: 919: 1400: 831: 681: 35: 1586: 418: 1547: 1448: 296:
state jurisdiction. Assistance of counsel was held to be requisite to due process of law in state felony proceedings with the
266: 1261: 246:
case, in which the petitioner, Johnson, had been convicted in federal court of feloniously possessing, uttering, and passing
1098: 1063: 839: 1429: 519: 1285: 978: 278: 243: 855: 764: 1491: 804: 796: 1380: 1173: 951: 788: 700: 561: 1766: 1595: 1574: 1277: 1181: 943: 927: 903: 708: 577: 1635: 1355: 1197: 1082: 1055: 1047: 887: 732: 512: 153: 487: 359: 104: 1539: 1309: 1229: 895: 847: 665: 262: 141: 1796: 1651: 1611: 1515: 871: 740: 435: 393: 338: 64: 250:
in a trial where he had not been represented by an attorney but instead by himself. Johnson filed for
748: 1675: 1619: 1507: 1499: 1301: 1154: 879: 585: 384: 298: 133: 469: 1804: 1707: 1523: 1392: 1253: 1245: 1237: 986: 724: 673: 549: 185: 173: 1828: 1774: 1699: 1667: 1555: 1408: 1269: 1133: 1018: 1010: 780: 772: 627: 451: 1691: 1683: 1531: 1467: 1336: 1213: 1090: 1026: 1002: 994: 823: 247: 1812: 1731: 1659: 1603: 1317: 1189: 935: 460: 258: 1221: 1205: 1038: 863: 569: 161: 504: 442: 1747: 1723: 1715: 1483: 970: 756: 478: 396: 341: 149: 1853: 1739: 1293: 911: 716: 251: 1643: 619: 606: 165: 67: 413: 283: 177: 83: 79: 496: 54:
Johnson v. Zerbst, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Ga.
231:
Cardozo took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
101: 1427: 1378: 1152: 1121: 646: 604: 547: 508: 30: 1860:
United States Sixth Amendment appointment of counsel case law
1870:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court
312:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 304
1785: 1758: 1585: 1566: 1459: 1440: 1347: 1328: 1165: 1074: 1037: 962: 815: 692: 657: 222: 214: 206: 198: 193: 122: 111: 96: 91: 59: 49: 42: 23: 202:Black, joined by Hughes, Brandeis, Stone, Roberts 261:had been violated, but he was denied by both a 520: 8: 1437: 1424: 1375: 1162: 1149: 1118: 654: 643: 601: 544: 527: 513: 505: 20: 1821:Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California 323: 18:1938 United States Supreme Court case 7: 920:Southern Union Co. v. United States 1401:United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal 832:Almendarez-Torres v. United States 682:Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 1865:United States Supreme Court cases 1348:Restrictions on cross-examination 438:458 (1938) is available from: 412: 29: 1449:United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez 1875:1938 in United States case law 1262:Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts 765:Rosales-Lopez v. United States 1: 536:United States Sixth Amendment 242:, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), was a 1430:Assistance of Counsel Clause 979:Rassmussen v. United States 279:United States Supreme Court 244:United States Supreme Court 1891: 1329:Face-to-face confrontation 1099:Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado 797:McDonnell v. United States 254:relief, claiming that his 1436: 1423: 1387: 1381:Compulsory Process Clause 1374: 1174:Reynolds v. United States 1161: 1148: 1128: 1117: 952:Erlinger v. United States 805:United States v. Tsarnaev 789:Skilling v. United States 701:Reynolds v. United States 653: 642: 614: 600: 562:Klopfer v. North Carolina 556: 543: 362: (5th Cir. 1937). 273:Supreme Court involvement 230: 127: 116: 28: 1767:Massiah v. United States 1596:Strickland v. Washington 1575:Glasser v. United States 1548:Nichols v. United States 1278:Bullcoming v. New Mexico 1182:Dowdell v. United States 944:United States v. Haymond 928:Alleyne v. United States 904:Cunningham v. California 709:Glasser v. United States 578:Doggett v. United States 1636:Glover v. United States 1356:Chambers v. Mississippi 1198:Bruton v. United States 1166:Out-of-court statements 1083:Tanner v. United States 1075:Impeachment of verdicts 1056:Burton v. United States 1048:United States v. Dawson 888:United States v. Booker 856:Harris v. United States 733:Witherspoon v. Illinois 286:, the Court held that, 1759:Uncounseled statements 1587:Ineffective assistance 1540:Pennsylvania v. Finley 1310:Samia v. United States 1230:Crawford v. Washington 1064:Smith v. United States 896:Washington v. Recuenco 848:Apprendi v. New Jersey 840:Jones v. United States 666:Cheff v. Schnackenberg 293: 263:federal district court 1797:Faretta v. California 1652:Woodford v. Visciotti 1612:Kimmelman v. Morrison 1516:Argersinger v. Hamlin 872:Blakely v. Washington 741:Ham v. South Carolina 648:Impartial Jury Clause 374:, 304 U.S. at 467-68. 288: 1676:Wright v. Van Patten 1620:Lockhart v. Fretwell 1508:Anders v. California 1500:Gideon v. Wainwright 1302:Hemphill v. New York 1286:Williams v. Illinois 1155:Confrontation Clause 880:Schriro v. Summerlin 586:Betterman v. Montana 385:Gideon v. Wainwright 299:Gideon v. Wainwright 45:Decided May 23, 1938 43:Argued April 4, 1938 1805:McKaskle v. Wiggins 1708:Padilla v. Kentucky 1524:Gagnon v. Scarpelli 1492:Hamilton v. Alabama 1393:Washington v. Texas 1254:Giles v. California 1246:Whorton v. Bockting 1238:Davis v. Washington 987:Williams v. Florida 725:Sheppard v. Maxwell 674:Duncan v. Louisiana 550:Speedy Trial Clause 488:Library of Congress 360:92 F.2d 748 174:Benjamin N. Cardozo 142:James C. McReynolds 78:58 S. Ct. 1019; 82 1829:Indiana v. Edwards 1775:Brewer v. Williams 1700:Porter v. McCollum 1668:Holland v. Jackson 1628:Williams v. Taylor 1556:Alabama v. Shelton 1409:Taylor v. Illinois 1270:Michigan v. Bryant 1134:Rabe v. Washington 1123:Information Clause 1019:Ramos v. Louisiana 1011:Burch v. Louisiana 963:Size and unanimity 781:Morgan v. Illinois 773:Wainwright v. Witt 628:Presley v. Georgia 302:decision in 1963. 138:Associate Justices 1847: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1838: 1692:Wong v. Belmontes 1684:Bobby v. Van Hook 1532:Scott v. Illinois 1476:Johnson v. Zerbst 1468:Powell v. Alabama 1419: 1418: 1370: 1369: 1366: 1365: 1337:Maryland v. Craig 1214:Illinois v. Allen 1144: 1143: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1091:Warger v. Shauers 1027:Edwards v. Vannoy 1003:Ballew v. Georgia 995:Apodaca v. Oregon 824:Walton v. Arizona 638: 637: 596: 595: 428:Johnson v. Zerbst 420:Johnson v. Zerbst 417:Works related to 355:Johnson v. Zerbst 331:Johnson v. Zerbst 248:counterfeit money 239:Johnson v. Zerbst 235: 234: 134:Charles E. Hughes 24:Johnson v. Zerbst 1882: 1813:Rock v. Arkansas 1732:Lafler v. Cooper 1660:Wiggins v. Smith 1604:Nix v. Whiteside 1438: 1425: 1376: 1318:Smith v. Arizona 1190:Pointer v. Texas 1163: 1150: 1119: 936:Hurst v. Florida 749:Ristaino v. Ross 655: 644: 602: 545: 529: 522: 515: 506: 501: 495: 492: 486: 483: 477: 474: 468: 465: 459: 456: 450: 447: 441: 416: 400: 381: 375: 369: 363: 357: 351: 345: 328: 267:court of appeals 259:right to counsel 123:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 1890: 1889: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1835: 1781: 1754: 1581: 1562: 1455: 1432: 1415: 1383: 1362: 1343: 1324: 1222:Ohio v. Roberts 1206:Frazier v. Cupp 1157: 1140: 1124: 1105: 1070: 1039:Vicinage Clause 1033: 958: 864:Ring v. Arizona 811: 688: 649: 634: 610: 592: 570:Barker v. Wingo 552: 539: 533: 499: 493: 490: 484: 481: 475: 472: 466: 463: 457: 454: 448: 445: 439: 409: 404: 403: 382: 378: 370: 366: 353: 352: 348: 329: 325: 320: 308: 275: 256:Sixth Amendment 186:Stanley F. Reed 176: 164: 162:Harlan F. Stone 152: 107:(5th Cir. 1937) 87: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 1888: 1886: 1878: 1877: 1872: 1867: 1862: 1852: 1851: 1845: 1844: 1841: 1840: 1837: 1836: 1834: 1833: 1825: 1817: 1809: 1801: 1792: 1790: 1789:representation 1783: 1782: 1780: 1779: 1771: 1762: 1760: 1756: 1755: 1753: 1752: 1748:Garza v. Idaho 1744: 1736: 1728: 1724:Premo v. Moore 1720: 1716:Sears v. Upton 1712: 1704: 1696: 1688: 1680: 1672: 1664: 1656: 1648: 1640: 1632: 1624: 1616: 1608: 1600: 1591: 1589: 1583: 1582: 1580: 1579: 1570: 1568: 1564: 1563: 1561: 1560: 1552: 1544: 1536: 1528: 1520: 1512: 1504: 1496: 1488: 1484:Betts v. Brady 1480: 1472: 1463: 1461: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1453: 1444: 1442: 1434: 1433: 1428: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1416: 1414: 1413: 1405: 1397: 1388: 1385: 1384: 1379: 1372: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1363: 1361: 1360: 1351: 1349: 1345: 1344: 1342: 1341: 1332: 1330: 1326: 1325: 1323: 1322: 1314: 1306: 1298: 1290: 1282: 1274: 1266: 1258: 1250: 1242: 1234: 1226: 1218: 1210: 1202: 1194: 1186: 1178: 1169: 1167: 1159: 1158: 1153: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1141: 1139: 1138: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1122: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1104: 1103: 1095: 1087: 1078: 1076: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1068: 1060: 1052: 1043: 1041: 1035: 1034: 1032: 1031: 1023: 1015: 1007: 999: 991: 983: 975: 971:Maxwell v. Dow 966: 964: 960: 959: 957: 956: 948: 940: 932: 924: 916: 908: 900: 892: 884: 876: 868: 860: 852: 844: 836: 828: 819: 817: 813: 812: 810: 809: 801: 793: 785: 777: 769: 761: 757:Adams v. Texas 753: 745: 737: 729: 721: 713: 705: 696: 694: 690: 689: 687: 686: 678: 670: 661: 659: 651: 650: 647: 640: 639: 636: 635: 633: 632: 624: 615: 612: 611: 605: 598: 597: 594: 593: 591: 590: 582: 574: 566: 557: 554: 553: 548: 541: 540: 534: 532: 531: 524: 517: 509: 503: 502: 470:Google Scholar 424: 408: 407:External links 405: 402: 401: 376: 364: 346: 322: 321: 319: 316: 315: 314: 307: 304: 274: 271: 233: 232: 228: 227: 224: 220: 219: 216: 212: 211: 208: 204: 203: 200: 196: 195: 191: 190: 189: 188: 150:Louis Brandeis 139: 136: 131: 125: 124: 120: 119: 114: 113: 109: 108: 98: 94: 93: 89: 88: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1887: 1876: 1873: 1871: 1868: 1866: 1863: 1861: 1858: 1857: 1855: 1831: 1830: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1818: 1815: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1791: 1788: 1784: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1761: 1757: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1742: 1741: 1740:Buck v. Davis 1737: 1734: 1733: 1729: 1726: 1725: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1713: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1697: 1694: 1693: 1689: 1686: 1685: 1681: 1678: 1677: 1673: 1670: 1669: 1665: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1654: 1653: 1649: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1630: 1629: 1625: 1622: 1621: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1601: 1598: 1597: 1593: 1592: 1590: 1588: 1584: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1571: 1569: 1567:Conflict-free 1565: 1558: 1557: 1553: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1502: 1501: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1464: 1462: 1458: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1445: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1426: 1422: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1382: 1377: 1373: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1350: 1346: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1331: 1327: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1296: 1295: 1294:Ohio v. Clark 1291: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1251: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1232: 1231: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1151: 1147: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1127: 1120: 1116: 1101: 1100: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1079: 1077: 1073: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1058: 1057: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1040: 1036: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1000: 997: 996: 992: 989: 988: 984: 981: 980: 976: 973: 972: 968: 967: 965: 961: 954: 953: 949: 946: 945: 941: 938: 937: 933: 930: 929: 925: 922: 921: 917: 914: 913: 912:Oregon v. Ice 909: 906: 905: 901: 898: 897: 893: 890: 889: 885: 882: 881: 877: 874: 873: 869: 866: 865: 861: 858: 857: 853: 850: 849: 845: 842: 841: 837: 834: 833: 829: 826: 825: 821: 820: 818: 814: 807: 806: 802: 799: 798: 794: 791: 790: 786: 783: 782: 778: 775: 774: 770: 767: 766: 762: 759: 758: 754: 751: 750: 746: 743: 742: 738: 735: 734: 730: 727: 726: 722: 719: 718: 717:Irvin v. Dowd 714: 711: 710: 706: 703: 702: 698: 697: 695: 691: 684: 683: 679: 676: 675: 671: 668: 667: 663: 662: 660: 656: 652: 645: 641: 630: 629: 625: 622: 621: 617: 616: 613: 608: 603: 599: 588: 587: 583: 580: 579: 575: 572: 571: 567: 564: 563: 559: 558: 555: 551: 546: 542: 537: 530: 525: 523: 518: 516: 511: 510: 507: 498: 489: 480: 471: 462: 453: 452:CourtListener 444: 437: 433: 429: 425: 423:at Wikisource 422: 421: 415: 411: 410: 406: 398: 395: 391: 387: 386: 380: 377: 373: 368: 365: 361: 356: 350: 347: 343: 340: 336: 332: 327: 324: 317: 313: 310: 309: 305: 303: 301: 300: 292: 287: 285: 280: 272: 270: 268: 264: 260: 257: 253: 252:habeas corpus 249: 245: 241: 240: 229: 225: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 197: 194:Case opinions 192: 187: 183: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 154:Pierce Butler 151: 147: 143: 140: 137: 135: 132: 130:Chief Justice 129: 128: 126: 121: 115: 110: 106: 103: 99: 95: 90: 85: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 1827: 1819: 1811: 1803: 1795: 1773: 1765: 1746: 1738: 1730: 1722: 1714: 1706: 1698: 1690: 1682: 1674: 1666: 1658: 1650: 1644:Bell v. Cone 1642: 1634: 1626: 1618: 1610: 1602: 1594: 1573: 1554: 1546: 1538: 1530: 1522: 1514: 1506: 1498: 1490: 1482: 1475: 1474: 1466: 1447: 1407: 1399: 1391: 1354: 1335: 1316: 1308: 1300: 1292: 1284: 1276: 1268: 1260: 1252: 1244: 1236: 1228: 1220: 1212: 1204: 1196: 1188: 1180: 1172: 1132: 1097: 1089: 1081: 1062: 1059:(1905, 1906) 1054: 1046: 1025: 1017: 1009: 1001: 993: 985: 977: 969: 950: 942: 934: 926: 918: 910: 902: 894: 886: 878: 870: 862: 854: 846: 838: 830: 822: 803: 795: 787: 779: 771: 763: 755: 747: 739: 731: 723: 715: 707: 699: 693:Impartiality 680: 672: 664: 658:Availability 626: 620:In re Oliver 618: 607:Public Trial 584: 576: 568: 560: 427: 419: 399: (1963). 383: 379: 371: 367: 354: 349: 344: (1938). 330: 326: 297: 294: 289: 276: 238: 237: 236: 181: 169: 166:Owen Roberts 157: 145: 92:Case history 71: 53: 15: 1460:Appointment 816:Facts found 207:Concurrence 82:1461; 1938 1854:Categories 497:OpenJurist 318:References 284:Hugo Black 218:McReynolds 178:Hugo Black 84:U.S. LEXIS 60:Citations 538:case law 426:Text of 306:See also 265:and the 199:Majority 118:liberty. 461:Findlaw 443:Cornell 372:Johnson 223:Dissent 215:Dissent 112:Holding 1832:(2008) 1824:(2000) 1816:(1987) 1808:(1984) 1800:(1975) 1787:Pro se 1778:(1977) 1770:(1963) 1751:(2019) 1743:(2017) 1735:(2012) 1727:(2011) 1719:(2010) 1711:(2010) 1703:(2009) 1695:(2009) 1687:(2009) 1679:(2008) 1671:(2004) 1663:(2003) 1655:(2002) 1647:(2002) 1639:(2001) 1631:(2000) 1623:(1993) 1615:(1986) 1607:(1986) 1599:(1984) 1578:(1942) 1559:(2002) 1551:(1994) 1543:(1987) 1535:(1979) 1527:(1973) 1519:(1972) 1511:(1967) 1503:(1963) 1495:(1961) 1487:(1942) 1479:(1938) 1471:(1932) 1452:(2006) 1441:Choice 1412:(1988) 1404:(1982) 1396:(1967) 1359:(1973) 1340:(1990) 1321:(2024) 1313:(2023) 1305:(2022) 1297:(2015) 1289:(2012) 1281:(2011) 1273:(2011) 1265:(2009) 1257:(2008) 1249:(2007) 1241:(2006) 1233:(2004) 1225:(1980) 1217:(1970) 1209:(1969) 1201:(1968) 1193:(1965) 1185:(1911) 1177:(1878) 1137:(1972) 1102:(2017) 1094:(2014) 1086:(1987) 1067:(2023) 1051:(1853) 1030:(2021) 1022:(2020) 1014:(1979) 1006:(1978) 998:(1972) 990:(1970) 982:(1905) 974:(1900) 955:(2024) 947:(2019) 939:(2016) 931:(2013) 923:(2012) 915:(2009) 907:(2007) 899:(2006) 891:(2005) 883:(2004) 875:(2004) 867:(2002) 859:(2002) 851:(2000) 843:(1999) 835:(1998) 827:(1990) 808:(2022) 800:(2016) 792:(2010) 784:(1992) 776:(1985) 768:(1981) 760:(1980) 752:(1976) 744:(1973) 736:(1968) 728:(1966) 720:(1961) 712:(1942) 704:(1878) 685:(1989) 677:(1968) 669:(1966) 631:(2010) 623:(1948) 609:Clause 589:(2016) 581:(1992) 573:(1972) 565:(1967) 500:  494:  491:  485:  482:  479:Justia 476:  473:  467:  464:  458:  455:  449:  446:  440:  388:, 358:, 333:, 226:Butler 184: 182:· 180:  172: 170:· 168:  160: 158:· 156:  148: 146:· 144:  80:L. Ed. 434: 392: 337: 97:Prior 436:U.S. 394:U.S. 339:U.S. 277:The 210:Reed 102:F.2d 73:more 65:U.S. 63:304 432:304 397:335 390:372 342:458 335:304 105:748 100:92 86:896 68:458 1856:: 430:, 269:. 528:e 521:t 514:v 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
458
more
L. Ed.
U.S. LEXIS
F.2d
748
Charles E. Hughes
James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis
Pierce Butler
Harlan F. Stone
Owen Roberts
Benjamin N. Cardozo
Hugo Black
Stanley F. Reed
United States Supreme Court
counterfeit money
habeas corpus
Sixth Amendment
right to counsel
federal district court
court of appeals
United States Supreme Court
Hugo Black
Gideon v. Wainwright
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 304
304
U.S.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.