145:
151:
48:
to build a landing strip. The neighbourhood brought an action against him to prevent him from building the strip on the basis that it violated a new specially-enacted municipal law that regulated the building of aerodromes.
57:
The majority held that aeronautics was a distinctive matter of national importance and so should reside within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government under the "
70:, the Court found that the matter went "beyond local or provincial concern or interests and must from its inherent nature be the concern of the Dominion as a whole."
194:
66:
218:
99:
82:
and ran it until his death in 1968. It was then sold and eventually ended up as a housing development. No trace of the airstrip exists today.
228:
213:
223:
58:
33:
187:
233:
180:
79:
25:
103:
45:
164:
127:
144:
100:"Johannesson v. Municipality of West St. Paul, 1951 CanLII 55 (SCC), (1952) 1 SCR 292"
207:
160:
36:
provision of the
Constitution and was the beginning of its modern interpretation.
29:
32:. This was also the first Supreme Court case to analyze the
168:
44:Konnie Johannesson bought a plot of land near the
21:Johannesson v West St Paul (Rural Municipality of)
128:Biography of Konnie Johannesson - The Great War
188:
8:
195:
181:
28:decision on the federal jurisdiction over
16:Judgement of the Supreme Court of Canada
91:
67:Ontario v. Canada Temperance Federation
7:
140:
138:
167:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
64:In examining the test set out in
59:peace, order, and good government
34:peace, order, and good government
149:
143:
1:
219:Supreme Court of Canada cases
229:Defunct airports in Manitoba
214:Canadian federalism case law
102:. 1951-10-12. Archived from
78:In 1949, Johannesson built
250:
137:
24:1 S.C.R. 297 is a leading
224:1952 in Canadian case law
26:Supreme Court of Canada
159:This article about
234:Canadian law stubs
176:
175:
80:the landing strip
241:
197:
190:
183:
155:
154:
153:
152:
147:
139:
115:
114:
112:
111:
96:
249:
248:
244:
243:
242:
240:
239:
238:
204:
203:
202:
201:
150:
148:
142:
135:
124:
119:
118:
109:
107:
98:
97:
93:
88:
76:
55:
42:
17:
12:
11:
5:
247:
245:
237:
236:
231:
226:
221:
216:
206:
205:
200:
199:
192:
185:
177:
174:
173:
156:
131:
130:
123:
122:External links
120:
117:
116:
90:
89:
87:
84:
75:
72:
54:
51:
41:
38:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
246:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
212:
211:
209:
198:
193:
191:
186:
184:
179:
178:
172:
170:
166:
162:
157:
146:
141:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:
121:
106:on 2012-07-21
105:
101:
95:
92:
85:
83:
81:
73:
71:
69:
68:
62:
60:
52:
50:
47:
39:
37:
35:
31:
27:
23:
22:
169:expanding it
161:Canadian law
158:
134:
132:
108:. Retrieved
104:the original
94:
77:
65:
63:
56:
43:
20:
19:
18:
30:aeronautics
208:Categories
110:2011-12-27
86:References
40:Background
74:Aftermath
61:" power.
46:Red River
53:Decision
163:is a
165:stub
210::
196:e
189:t
182:v
171:.
113:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
