Knowledge

Kuder–Richardson formulas

Source 📝

63:
Values can range from 0.00 to 1.00 (sometimes expressed as 0 to 100), with high values indicating that the examination is likely to correlate with alternate forms (a desirable characteristic). The KR-20 may be affected by difficulty of the test, the spread in scores and the length of the examination.
533:), is assumed to be the same for each item, however, in practice, KR-21 can be applied by finding the average item difficulty across the entirety of the test. KR-21 tends to be a more conservative estimate of reliability than KR-20, which in turn is a more conservative estimate than Cronbach's 420:
Often discussed in tandem with KR-20, is Kuder–Richardson Formula 21 (KR-21). KR-21 is a simplified version of KR-20, which can be used when the difficulty of all items on the test are known to be equal. Like KR-20, KR-21 was first set forth as the twenty-first formula discussed in Kuder and
59:
test. However, like Cronbach's α, homogeneity (that is, unidimensionality) is actually an assumption, not a conclusion, of reliability coefficients. It is possible, for example, to have a high KR-20 with a multidimensional scale, especially with a large number of items.
67:
In the case when scores are not tau-equivalent (for example when there is not homogeneous but rather examination items of increasing difficulty) then the KR-20 is an indication of the lower bound of internal consistency (reliability).
354: 524: 203: 411: 250: 56: 48:
The name of this formula stems from the fact that is the twentieth formula discussed in Kuder and Richardson's seminal paper on test reliability.
641: 651: 55:, computed for dichotomous scores. It is often claimed that a high KR-20 coefficient (e.g., > 0.90) indicates a 37: 25: 366:
If it is important to use unbiased operators then the sum of squares should be divided by degrees of freedom (
430: 89: 646: 602: 534: 52: 555:
Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability.
568:
Cortina, J. M., (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications.
33: 373: 349:{\displaystyle \sigma _{X}^{2}={\frac {\sum _{i=1}^{n}(X_{i}-{\bar {X}})^{2}\,{}}{n}}.} 529:
Similarly to KR-20, K is equal to the number of items. Difficulty level of the items (
635: 17: 626: 588:. Annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association. New Orleans. 29: 627:
Quality of assessment chapter in Illinois State Assessment handbook (1995)
585:
Understanding a Widely Misunderstood Statistic: Cronbach's "Alpha"
583: 24:, first published in 1937, are a measure of internal consistency 603:"Kuder and Richardson Formula 20 | Real Statistics Using Excel" 370: − 1) and the probabilities are multiplied by 376: 226:
is the proportion of incorrect responses to test item
433: 253: 92: 215:
is the proportion of correct responses to test item
518: 405: 348: 197: 244:= 1), and the variance for the denominator is 8: 503: 498: 469: 440: 432: 380: 375: 335: 334: 328: 313: 312: 303: 290: 279: 272: 263: 258: 252: 182: 177: 166: 156: 146: 135: 128: 99: 91: 548: 519:{\displaystyle r={\frac {K}{K-1}}\left} 198:{\displaystyle r={\frac {K}{K-1}}\left} 582:Ritter, Nicola L. (18 February 2010). 71:The formula for KR-20 for a test with 7: 597: 595: 416:Kuder–Richardson Formula 21 (KR-21) 44:Kuder–Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) 424:The formula for KR-21 is as such: 14: 570:Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 32:choices. They were developed by 490: 478: 397: 385: 325: 318: 296: 1: 668: 363:is the total sample size. 642:Comparison of assessments 421:Richardson's 1937 paper. 22:Kuder–Richardson formulas 51:It is a special case of 652:Statistical reliability 520: 407: 350: 295: 199: 151: 521: 408: 406:{\textstyle n/(n-1).} 351: 275: 200: 131: 431: 374: 251: 90: 75:test items numbered 508: 268: 187: 516: 494: 403: 346: 254: 195: 173: 79: = 1 to 28:for measures with 509: 456: 341: 321: 188: 115: 659: 614: 613: 611: 609: 599: 590: 589: 579: 573: 566: 560: 557:Psychometrika, 2 553: 525: 523: 522: 517: 515: 511: 510: 507: 502: 493: 470: 457: 455: 441: 412: 410: 409: 404: 384: 355: 353: 352: 347: 342: 337: 336: 333: 332: 323: 322: 314: 308: 307: 294: 289: 273: 267: 262: 204: 202: 201: 196: 194: 190: 189: 186: 181: 172: 171: 170: 161: 160: 150: 145: 129: 116: 114: 100: 667: 666: 662: 661: 660: 658: 657: 656: 632: 631: 623: 618: 617: 607: 605: 601: 600: 593: 581: 580: 576: 567: 563: 554: 550: 545: 471: 462: 458: 445: 429: 428: 418: 372: 371: 324: 299: 274: 249: 248: 242: 235: 224: 213: 162: 152: 130: 121: 117: 104: 88: 87: 46: 12: 11: 5: 665: 663: 655: 654: 649: 644: 634: 633: 630: 629: 622: 621:External links 619: 616: 615: 591: 574: 561: 547: 546: 544: 541: 527: 526: 514: 506: 501: 497: 492: 489: 486: 483: 480: 477: 474: 468: 465: 461: 454: 451: 448: 444: 439: 436: 417: 414: 402: 399: 396: 393: 390: 387: 383: 379: 357: 356: 345: 340: 331: 327: 320: 317: 311: 306: 302: 298: 293: 288: 285: 282: 278: 271: 266: 261: 257: 240: 233: 222: 211: 206: 205: 193: 185: 180: 176: 169: 165: 159: 155: 149: 144: 141: 138: 134: 127: 124: 120: 113: 110: 107: 103: 98: 95: 45: 42: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 664: 653: 650: 648: 647:Psychometrics 645: 643: 640: 639: 637: 628: 625: 624: 620: 604: 598: 596: 592: 587: 586: 578: 575: 571: 565: 562: 559:(3), 151–160. 558: 552: 549: 542: 540: 538: 537: 532: 512: 504: 499: 495: 487: 484: 481: 475: 472: 466: 463: 459: 452: 449: 446: 442: 437: 434: 427: 426: 425: 422: 415: 413: 400: 394: 391: 388: 381: 377: 369: 364: 362: 343: 338: 329: 315: 309: 304: 300: 291: 286: 283: 280: 276: 269: 264: 259: 255: 247: 246: 245: 243: 236: 229: 225: 218: 214: 191: 183: 178: 174: 167: 163: 157: 153: 147: 142: 139: 136: 132: 125: 122: 118: 111: 108: 105: 101: 96: 93: 86: 85: 84: 82: 78: 74: 69: 65: 61: 58: 54: 49: 43: 41: 39: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 18:psychometrics 606:. Retrieved 584: 577: 572:(1), 98–104. 569: 564: 556: 551: 535: 530: 528: 423: 419: 367: 365: 360: 358: 238: 231: 227: 220: 216: 209: 207: 80: 76: 72: 70: 66: 62: 53:Cronbach's α 50: 47: 21: 15: 57:homogeneous 30:dichotomous 26:reliability 636:Categories 543:References 38:Richardson 496:σ 485:− 467:− 450:− 392:− 319:¯ 310:− 277:∑ 256:σ 230:(so that 175:σ 133:∑ 126:− 109:− 608:8 March 359:where 208:where 20:, the 34:Kuder 610:2019 36:and 83:is 16:In 638:: 594:^ 539:. 237:+ 219:, 40:. 612:. 536:α 531:p 513:] 505:2 500:X 491:) 488:p 482:1 479:( 476:p 473:K 464:1 460:[ 453:1 447:K 443:K 438:= 435:r 401:. 398:) 395:1 389:n 386:( 382:/ 378:n 368:n 361:n 344:. 339:n 330:2 326:) 316:X 305:i 301:X 297:( 292:n 287:1 284:= 281:i 270:= 265:2 260:X 241:i 239:q 234:i 232:p 228:i 223:i 221:q 217:i 212:i 210:p 192:] 184:2 179:X 168:i 164:q 158:i 154:p 148:K 143:1 140:= 137:i 123:1 119:[ 112:1 106:K 102:K 97:= 94:r 81:K 77:i 73:K

Index

psychometrics
reliability
dichotomous
Kuder
Richardson
Cronbach's α
homogeneous
α
Understanding a Widely Misunderstood Statistic: Cronbach's "Alpha"


"Kuder and Richardson Formula 20 | Real Statistics Using Excel"
Quality of assessment chapter in Illinois State Assessment handbook (1995)
Categories
Comparison of assessments
Psychometrics
Statistical reliability

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.