Knowledge (XXG)

Palmer v. Kleargear.com

Source 📝

263:, representing the Palmers, sent an open letter demanding that Kleargear pay the Palmers $ 75,000, remove the taint on their credit rating, and cease and desist from using the non-disparagement clause in the future. Kleargear ignored a December 16, 2013, deadline to respond to the offer, and Public Citizen sued the company in federal court for 278:
in favor of the Palmers. Kleargear stated to the press that the default judgment was not valid because notice should have been served to its parent company in France. Judge Benson awarded the Palmers $ 306,750 in compensatory and punitive damages on June 25, 2014. On July 24, the Palmers filed a
206:
for $ 3,500 based on an anti-disparagement clause of their site's terms and conditions unless they agreed to take down the review. Ripoff Report has a policy of not removing reviews; statements of fact could only be removed if a $ 2,000 arbitration fee was paid and the arbitrator determined that
289:
Responding to the Palmers' experience with KlearGear, California enacted a law in 2014 banning the use of non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. Similar bans were introduced in both houses of Congress in 2015, and Jen Palmer testified live before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce,
197:
The plaintiffs, John and Jen Palmer, attempted to purchase a desk ornament and keychain from the company at a price under $ 20. Kleargear.com never delivered. PayPal automatically canceled the order in December 2008. Soon after, Jen left a negative review at
73: 188:
The case led to a California statute prohibiting the enforcement of such clauses, and the introduction of the Consumer Review Freedom Act of 2015, a proposed bill that, since passed, has enacted similar prohibitions at the federal level.
166:, filed December 18, 2013), is a 2013 US federal lawsuit in which an internet retailer was sued by two of its customers after it billed the customers for $ 3,500 following a negative review. The retailer, Kleargear.com, specializes in 333:
Inspired by the Palmers' experience with KlearGear, the California legislature passed a bill in 2014 to ban the use of non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts, and Governor Jerry Brown signed it into law on September 9, 2014.
290:
Science, and Transportation in November 2015. Public Citizen submitted written testimony to the committee as well. With Public Citizen's support, the Consumer Review Freedom Act passed the Senate in December 2015.
218:
One issue in the dispute was whether the disparagement clause had been present when the plaintiffs had made their order in 2008. In 2013, after examining archives of Kleargear's Terms of Service at the
182:. In March 2014, the district court entered a default judgment for the plaintiffs, and in June 2014 awarded damages of $ 306,750. As of 2015, the Palmers continue to attempt to collect the judgment. 353: 294: 839: 636: 267:
violations, defamation, and other torts. According to attorney Scott Michelman, numerous attempts to get in touch with Kleargear before the suit were unsuccessful. In March 2014,
163: 83: 753: 365: 725: 608: 233:
stated that the clause had not been present and had been added to the site in June 2012. In 2014, Kleargear stated that the clause had been present in 2008.
179: 1160: 868: 472: 282:
On February 15, 2015, Judge Benson approved assignment of the judgment to the Law Offices of Ronald P. Slates, a Los Angeles law firm specializing in
121:
Default judgment; $ 306,750 in compensatory and punitive damages; reporting customer to debt collection for publishing a negative review violates the
697: 1317: 1312: 1183: 1088: 1322: 415: 664: 373: 1209: 268: 174:
toys, gadgets and office toys; it is owned by Paris-based Descoteaux Boutiques. The plaintiffs charged the company with violating the
1135: 763: 279:
motion for $ 47,596.86 in attorneys' fees and expenses. On August 28, the court awarded fees and expenses in the amount requested.
1297: 377: 321:
against accounts held by Kleargear with those companies. As of October 2015, the case is assigned to U.S. District Court Judge
185:
The internet retailer's charge to the consumer was based on an anti-disparagement clause of their site's terms and conditions.
812: 969: 384: 38: 503: 356:
scheduled hearings on the bill for November 4, 2015. Among those scheduled to testify were Jen Palmer, a plaintiff in
341:) was introduced in the U.S. Congress, to make such clauses void and unenforceable at the federal level. U.S. Senator 873: 477: 306: 896:"Public Citizen Sues Online Retailer That Damaged Utah Customer's Credit in Retaliation for Critical Online Review" 1245: 1257: 535: 264: 175: 149: 122: 817: 310: 207:
those statements were false. When Palmer and her husband John refused to pay, Kleargear reported the fine for
840:"Public Citizen Suing On Behalf Of Customers Whose Credit Was Ruined By KlearGear's $ 3,500 'Bad Review' Fee" 1290: 1251: 1060: 943: 1276: 322: 245: 252:
have issued statements that Kleargear used their logos without permission and have begun investigations.
1327: 508: 580: 236:
Following an internet backlash, Kleargear closed its Facebook page and protected its Twitter account.
1115: 786: 446: 283: 1270: 895: 338: 1136:"Sen. Moran Introduces Legislation to Protect Consumers from Fines for Negative Online Reviews" 924: 388: 974: 726:"KlearGear Goes Into Social Media Lockdown After It Charges Customers For Posting Bad Reviews" 208: 530: 275: 241: 220: 665:"The Yelper and the Negative Review: the Developing Battle Over Nondisparagement Clauses" 900: 260: 1306: 813:"Utah Couple Fined $ 3,500 by Online Merchant KlearGear Retains Lawyer, Turns Tables" 758: 391:), unanimously passed in the Senate. On December 15, 2016, it was signed into law by 302: 212: 199: 702: 473:"Retailer That Fined Couple $ 3,500 for Negative Review Hit With Lawsuit - US News" 420: 392: 369: 318: 203: 996: 361: 342: 298: 1121: 787:"Follow Up: Action on Behalf of Woman Fined for Penning Negative Online Review" 637:"Online Retailer Says If You Give It A Negative Review It Can Fine You $ 3,500" 94:
John Palmer and Jennifer Kulas v. Kleargear.com and Fidelity Information Corp.
730: 585: 383:
In November 2016, the amended Consumer Review Freedom Act of 2015, titled the
271: 137: 65:
John Palmer and Jennifer Kulas v. Kleargear.com and Fidelity Information Corp.
1184:"It will soon be illegal to punish customers who criticize businesses online" 970:"Retailer that charged $ 3,500 for bad review to fight Utah couple's lawsuit" 314: 609:"Company Tries to Fine Customer $ 3,500 for Leaving Negative Review Online" 72: 1001: 869:"Retailer That Fined Couple $ 3,500 for Negative Review Hit With Lawsuit" 844: 641: 613: 253: 229: 17: 947: 698:"Embattled retailer KlearGear fights back against online review defeat" 249: 925:"Defiance May Soon Pay Off for Couple Fined Over Negative Comments" 558: 416:"KlearGear must pay $ 306,750 to couple that left negative review" 1210:"President Obama signs the Consumer Review Fairness Act into law" 1026:
no. 13-00175, D. Utah, Motion For Attorneys' Fees (July 24, 2014)
301:
of Kleargear assets, including levies with credit card companies
293:
In April 2015, the Palmers and the Slates firm filed suit in the
1161:"How 'Gagging' Honest Reviews Affects Consumers and the Economy" 928: 790: 504:"Layton couple sue KlearGear for $ 3,500 negative-review charge" 224: 171: 167: 354:
U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
337:
In September 2015, the Consumer Review Freedom Act of 2015 (
1050:
no. 13-00175, D. Utah, Docket entry 25 (February 15, 2015)
295:
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
1038:
no. 13-00175, D. Utah, Docket entry 22 (August 28, 2014)
202:. In May 2012, the company sent a bill to Jen Palmer of 1089:"California protects the right to Yelp without penalty" 42: 1155: 1153: 84:
United States District Court for the District of Utah
1298:
California law prohibiting non-disparagement clauses
754:"A Company Is Sued Over Its 'No Bad Reviews' Clause" 143: 133: 128: 115: 107: 99: 89: 79: 63: 256:also began an investigation on the credit report. 366:Information Technology and Innovation Foundation 531:"BBC News - A case for reading the small print" 376:; and Ira Rheingold, executive director of the 1077:no. 15-03656, C.D. Cal. (filed April 30, 2015) 1070: 1068: 559:"Exploitation by Wrap Contracts – Click 'Agree 111:no. 13-cv-00175 (D. Utah, filed Dec. 18, 2013) 944:"Utah couple wins suit against KlearGear.com" 240:called the public backlash an example of the 8: 447:"Fined For Posting a Negative Review Online" 180:intentional infliction of emotional distress 26: 440: 438: 378:National Association of Consumer Advocates 71: 60: 579:Frauenfelder, Mark (November 15, 2013). 32:This is an accepted version of this page 1208:Tarantola, Andrew (December 15, 2016). 691: 689: 607:McNally, Victoria (November 19, 2013). 497: 495: 403: 364:; Daniel Castro, vice-president of the 28: 752:Brustein, Joshua (December 18, 2013). 1087:Chokshi, Niraj (September 10, 2014). 567:California Bar IP Journal, New Matter 409: 407: 7: 1048:Palmer & Kulas v. Kleargear.com, 1036:Palmer & Kulas v. Kleargear.com, 1024:Palmer & Kulas v. Kleargear.com, 997:"Bad review couple win compensation" 867:Nelson, Steven (December 18, 2013). 785:Gephardt, Matt (November 21, 2013). 502:Piper, Matthew (December 18, 2013). 471:Nelson, Steven (December 18, 2013). 374:Santa Clara University School of Law 942:Van Geer, Rachel (March 17, 2014). 1277:Amended Kleargear Public Statement 1182:Brodkin, Jon (November 29, 2016). 811:Kim, Susanna (November 26, 2013). 635:Cushing, Tim (November 14, 2013). 269:United States District Court judge 57: 1138:. U.S. Senate. September 18, 2015 923:Gephardt, Matt (March 21, 2014). 724:Biggs, John (November 18, 2013). 360:; Adam Medros, vice-president of 1075:Palmer, et al. v. Kleargear.com, 414:Farivar, Cyrus (June 25, 2014). 349:case as one basis for the bill. 1318:United States contract case law 1313:United States Internet case law 1163:. U.S. Senate. October 30, 2015 968:Manson, Pamela (May 20, 2014). 696:Farivar, Cyrus (May 20, 2014). 307:American Express Centurion Bank 1323:2013 in United States case law 557:Kim, Nancy S. (June 2, 2014). 1: 874:U.S. News & World Report 569:, Vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 10–17. 478:U.S. News & World Report 385:Consumer Review Fairness Act 286:, and closed the Utah case. 1240:, no. 13-cv-00175 (D. Utah) 663:Davis, Noah C. (May 2014). 297:to enforce the judgment by 211:, which dragged down their 1344: 1271:KlearGear Public Statement 674:. American Bar Association 1120:Vol. 161, Page  536:BBC News Magazine Monitor 372:, a law professor at the 265:Fair Credit Reporting Act 176:Fair Credit Reporting Act 150:Fair Credit Reporting Act 148: 123:Fair Credit Reporting Act 120: 70: 1265:Kleargear.com statements 311:MasterCard International 39:latest accepted revision 581:"Kleargear bills woman" 159:Palmer v. Kleargear.com 1258:order awarding damages 259:On November 25, 2013, 246:Better Business Bureau 1260:, issued July 1, 2014 1248:, filed Dec. 18, 2013 509:The Salt Lake Tribune 1254:, issued May 5, 2014 1124:(September 16, 2015) 1116:Congressional Record 766:on December 18, 2013 329:Further implications 1291:Palmer v. Kleargear 1238:Palmer v. Kleargear 1093:The Washington Post 904:. December 18, 2013 848:. November 26, 2013 539:. November 18, 2013 358:Palmer v. KlearGear 284:judgment collection 162:, no. 13-cv-00175 ( 29:Page version status 35: 1294:at Public Citizen 1236:Legal documents, 975:Salt Lake Tribune 178:, defamation and 155: 154: 16:(Redirected from 1335: 1252:default judgment 1225: 1224: 1222: 1220: 1205: 1199: 1198: 1196: 1194: 1179: 1173: 1172: 1170: 1168: 1157: 1148: 1147: 1145: 1143: 1132: 1126: 1125: 1110: 1104: 1103: 1101: 1099: 1084: 1078: 1072: 1063: 1057: 1051: 1045: 1039: 1033: 1027: 1021: 1015: 1014: 1012: 1010: 993: 987: 986: 984: 982: 965: 959: 958: 956: 954: 939: 933: 932: 920: 914: 913: 911: 909: 892: 886: 885: 883: 881: 864: 858: 857: 855: 853: 836: 830: 829: 827: 825: 808: 802: 801: 799: 797: 782: 776: 775: 773: 771: 762:. Archived from 749: 743: 742: 740: 738: 721: 715: 714: 712: 710: 693: 684: 683: 681: 679: 669: 660: 654: 653: 651: 649: 632: 626: 625: 623: 621: 604: 598: 597: 595: 593: 576: 570: 562: 555: 549: 548: 546: 544: 527: 521: 520: 518: 516: 499: 490: 489: 487: 485: 468: 462: 461: 459: 457: 445:Gephardt, Matt. 442: 433: 432: 430: 428: 411: 276:default judgment 242:Streisand effect 221:Internet Archive 129:Court membership 75: 61: 21: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1303: 1302: 1286: 1267: 1242: 1233: 1228: 1218: 1216: 1207: 1206: 1202: 1192: 1190: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1166: 1164: 1159: 1158: 1151: 1141: 1139: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1097: 1095: 1086: 1085: 1081: 1073: 1066: 1059:retrieved from 1058: 1054: 1046: 1042: 1034: 1030: 1022: 1018: 1008: 1006: 1005:. June 26, 2014 995: 994: 990: 980: 978: 967: 966: 962: 952: 950: 941: 940: 936: 922: 921: 917: 907: 905: 894: 893: 889: 879: 877: 866: 865: 861: 851: 849: 838: 837: 833: 823: 821: 810: 809: 805: 795: 793: 784: 783: 779: 769: 767: 751: 750: 746: 736: 734: 723: 722: 718: 708: 706: 695: 694: 687: 677: 675: 667: 662: 661: 657: 647: 645: 634: 633: 629: 619: 617: 606: 605: 601: 591: 589: 578: 577: 573: 560: 556: 552: 542: 540: 529: 528: 524: 514: 512: 501: 500: 493: 483: 481: 470: 469: 465: 455: 453: 444: 443: 436: 426: 424: 413: 412: 405: 401: 331: 195: 55: 54: 53: 52: 51: 50: 34: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1341: 1339: 1331: 1330: 1325: 1320: 1315: 1305: 1304: 1301: 1300: 1295: 1285: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279:, May 21, 2014 1274: 1273:, May 19, 2014 1266: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1255: 1249: 1241: 1234: 1232: 1231:External links 1229: 1227: 1226: 1200: 1174: 1149: 1127: 1105: 1079: 1064: 1062:, May 10, 2016 1052: 1040: 1028: 1016: 988: 960: 934: 915: 901:Public Citizen 887: 859: 831: 803: 777: 744: 716: 685: 655: 627: 599: 571: 550: 522: 491: 463: 434: 402: 400: 397: 389:H.R. 5111 330: 327: 323:George H. King 261:Public Citizen 194: 191: 153: 152: 146: 145: 141: 140: 135: 131: 130: 126: 125: 118: 117: 113: 112: 109: 105: 104: 101: 97: 96: 91: 90:Full case name 87: 86: 81: 77: 76: 68: 67: 56: 36: 30: 27: 25: 24: 23: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1340: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1316: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1308: 1299: 1296: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1278: 1275: 1272: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1259: 1256: 1253: 1250: 1247: 1244: 1243: 1239: 1235: 1230: 1215: 1211: 1204: 1201: 1189: 1185: 1178: 1175: 1162: 1156: 1154: 1150: 1137: 1131: 1128: 1123: 1119: 1117: 1109: 1106: 1098:September 10, 1094: 1090: 1083: 1080: 1076: 1071: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1029: 1025: 1020: 1017: 1004: 1003: 998: 992: 989: 977: 976: 971: 964: 961: 949: 945: 938: 935: 930: 926: 919: 916: 903: 902: 897: 891: 888: 876: 875: 870: 863: 860: 847: 846: 841: 835: 832: 820: 819: 814: 807: 804: 792: 788: 781: 778: 765: 761: 760: 759:Business Week 755: 748: 745: 733: 732: 727: 720: 717: 705: 704: 699: 692: 690: 686: 673: 666: 659: 656: 644: 643: 638: 631: 628: 616: 615: 610: 603: 600: 588: 587: 582: 575: 572: 568: 564: 554: 551: 538: 537: 532: 526: 523: 511: 510: 505: 498: 496: 492: 480: 479: 474: 467: 464: 452: 448: 441: 439: 435: 423: 422: 417: 410: 408: 404: 398: 396: 394: 390: 386: 381: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 350: 348: 344: 340: 335: 328: 326: 324: 320: 317:, as well as 316: 312: 308: 304: 303:Discover Bank 300: 296: 291: 287: 285: 280: 277: 273: 270: 266: 262: 257: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 234: 232: 231: 226: 222: 216: 214: 213:credit rating 210: 205: 201: 200:Ripoff Report 192: 190: 186: 183: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 160: 151: 147: 142: 139: 136: 134:Judge sitting 132: 127: 124: 119: 114: 110: 106: 103:June 25, 2014 102: 98: 95: 92: 88: 85: 82: 78: 74: 69: 66: 62: 59: 48: 44: 40: 33: 19: 1328:2013 in Utah 1289: 1237: 1219:December 16, 1217:. Retrieved 1213: 1203: 1193:November 29, 1191:. Retrieved 1188:Ars Technica 1187: 1177: 1165:. Retrieved 1140:. Retrieved 1130: 1114: 1108: 1096:. Retrieved 1092: 1082: 1074: 1055: 1047: 1043: 1035: 1031: 1023: 1019: 1007:. Retrieved 1000: 991: 979:. Retrieved 973: 963: 951:. Retrieved 937: 918: 908:December 25, 906:. Retrieved 899: 890: 880:December 21, 878:. Retrieved 872: 862: 852:November 27, 850:. Retrieved 843: 834: 824:November 28, 822:. Retrieved 816: 806: 796:November 27, 794:. Retrieved 780: 770:December 25, 768:. Retrieved 764:the original 757: 747: 737:November 26, 735:. Retrieved 729: 719: 707:. Retrieved 703:Ars Technica 701: 676:. Retrieved 671: 658: 648:November 26, 646:. Retrieved 640: 630: 620:November 26, 618:. Retrieved 612: 602: 592:November 27, 590:. Retrieved 584: 574: 566: 553: 543:November 26, 541:. Retrieved 534: 525: 513:. Retrieved 507: 482:. Retrieved 476: 466: 454:. Retrieved 450: 425:. Retrieved 421:Ars Technica 419: 393:Barack Obama 382: 370:Eric Goldman 357: 351: 346: 339:S. 2044 336: 332: 319:PayPal, Inc. 292: 288: 281: 258: 238:Businessweek 237: 235: 228: 217: 204:Layton, Utah 196: 187: 184: 158: 157: 156: 93: 64: 58: 46: 37:This is the 31: 1167:October 30, 1142:October 30, 362:TripAdvisor 343:Jerry Moran 299:garnishment 244:. Both the 47:3 July 2024 1307:Categories 1113:2015  731:TechCrunch 586:BoingBoing 399:References 345:cited the 274:entered a 272:Dee Benson 209:collection 138:Dee Benson 1246:complaint 387:of 2016 ( 347:Kleargear 315:Visa Inc. 170:apparel, 108:Citations 18:Kleargear 1214:Engadget 1009:June 29, 1002:BBC News 981:July 10, 953:June 30, 845:Techdirt 818:ABC News 709:June 30, 678:July 13, 642:Techdirt 614:Mashable 515:June 30, 484:July 13, 456:July 13, 427:June 29, 254:Experian 230:Techdirt 144:Keywords 43:reviewed 948:WOOD-TV 193:History 164:D. Utah 116:Holding 100:Decided 672:GPSolo 313:, and 250:TRUSTe 1284:Other 1122:S6699 668:(PDF) 80:Court 1221:2016 1195:2016 1169:2015 1144:2015 1100:2014 1011:2014 983:2014 955:2014 929:KUTV 910:2013 882:2013 854:2013 826:2013 798:2013 791:KUTV 772:2013 739:2013 711:2014 680:2014 650:2013 622:2013 594:2013 545:2013 517:2014 486:2014 458:2014 451:KUTV 429:2014 352:The 248:and 227:and 225:KUTV 172:geek 168:nerd 45:on 1309:: 1212:. 1186:. 1152:^ 1118:, 1091:. 1067:^ 999:. 972:. 946:. 927:. 898:. 871:. 842:. 815:. 789:. 756:. 728:. 700:. 688:^ 670:. 639:. 611:. 583:. 565:. 533:. 506:. 494:^ 475:. 449:. 437:^ 418:. 406:^ 395:. 380:. 368:; 325:. 309:, 305:, 223:, 215:. 41:, 1223:. 1197:. 1171:. 1146:. 1102:. 1013:. 985:. 957:. 931:. 912:. 884:. 856:. 828:. 800:. 774:. 741:. 713:. 682:. 652:. 624:. 596:. 563:" 561:' 547:. 519:. 488:. 460:. 431:. 49:. 20:)

Index

Kleargear
latest accepted revision
reviewed

United States District Court for the District of Utah
Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dee Benson
Fair Credit Reporting Act
D. Utah
nerd
geek
Fair Credit Reporting Act
intentional infliction of emotional distress
Ripoff Report
Layton, Utah
collection
credit rating
Internet Archive
KUTV
Techdirt
Streisand effect
Better Business Bureau
TRUSTe
Experian
Public Citizen
Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States District Court judge
Dee Benson
default judgment
judgment collection

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.