165:
138:
judges must be accompanied by the vote of at least one professional judge. Lay judges are allowed to directly question the defendant during the course of the trial and decide on the sentence corresponding to the verdict. The previous system relied only on a panel of professional judges, and the majority of cases brought forward by prosecutors were those where conviction was high. Citizens chosen who do not serve in their role would be fined 100,000
118:(including at least one professional judge, as explained below) can pass a guilty verdict and impose a penalty. Lay judges’ roles are nevertheless constrained; notably, legal interpretations and determinations remain with the professional judges. Unlike the Anglo-American rule for criminal jury trials, both convictions and acquittals as well as sentence remain subject to appeal by the prosecution and the defence.
196:
introduced to mock trials over recent years to overcome their reluctance to express opinions publicly, debate, and defy authority figures. Others have written with concern regarding the harsh secrecy provision in the statute which includes the risk of criminal penalties for those lay judges who would publicly share confidential deliberation room discussion even after trial proceedings are complete.
199:
Another issue is that some criminal trials used to take years if the charge was serious and the defence contested the charge. After the system moved to include lay judges, the trial period was fixed to a maximum of a few weeks. Some commentators feel justice is compromised for the convenience of lay
121:
The
Japanese system is apparently unique in that the panel consists of six lay judges, chosen randomly from the public, together with three professional judges, who come together for a single trial (like an Anglo-American jury) but serve as lay judges. As with any jury or lay judge system, it places
137:
According to the selection process, the judges selected were to be a minimum age of 20 and listed on the election lists. Judges must also have completed a secondary level education. The vote of a majority of the lay judges for acquittal results in acquittal, but for conviction a majority of the lay
113:
countries, such as those in continental Europe and Latin
America. In a common law adversarial system, the judge acts as a referee over the contest between the defence attorney and the prosecutor, in which the two sides present the facts of their case to the panel of jurors; the judge in this system
150:
Katsuyoshi Fuji, 72, was found guilty in the stabbing death of a 66-year-old neighbor and sentenced to 15 years in jail at the first lay-judge trial held in the Tokyo
District Court. On August 3, 2009, six citizens were chosen to serve as "saiban-in" and join three judges at the trial attended by
195:
As in most common law countries where people are reluctant to serve as jury members, many
Japanese have expressed reluctance to serve as lay judges. Polls suggest that, similar to developed jury systems, 70% of the population of Japan would be reluctant to serve as judges. Some Japanese have been
133:
specifically avoided using the term "jury" (Baishin-in) and use the term "lay judge" (Saiban-in) instead. Therefore, the current system is categorically not a jury system though this misunderstanding persists in common law countries due to lack of understanding of civil law criminal procedure.
117:
In the civil law inquisitorial system, the entire panel of judges conduct a public investigation of the crime at the trial, and pass the verdict and sentence those found guilty. For this reason, each member of the panel can initiate the examination of evidence and witnesses, and by a majority
122:
a large amount of judicial power on randomly chosen members of the public with the aim of democratizing the judicial process. In this, Japan's law states its purpose explicitly as seeking “the promotion of the public’s understanding of the judicial system and … their confidence in it.”
23:'s administration. Although the system generated relatively high acquittal rates, it was rarely used, in part because it required defendants to give up their rights to appeal the factual determinations made. The system lapsed by the end of
77:, are randomly selected out of the electoral register and, together with professional judges, conduct a public investigation of the evidence in order to determine guilt and sentences. In most cases, the judicial panel is composed of six
151:
2,500 people queuing to get into the sixty-seat public gallery. Because Fujii had entered a guilty plea, the lay judges' role was primarily pertaining to the severity of the sentence to be handed down. The trial was open to the media.
853:
125:
A guilty verdict requires a numerical majority of nine judges that includes at least one professional judge. Accordingly, the three professional judges as a collective have a
467:
27:. In 2009, as a part of a larger judicial reform project, laws came into force to introduce citizen participation in certain criminal trials by introducing
898:
812:
893:
365:
280:
921:
623:
614:
651:
903:
81:
and three professional judges. In cases where there is no substantial dispute over guilt, the panel is composed of four
888:
883:
858:
618:
589:
130:
873:
822:
85:
and one professional judge. Unlike under the older jury system, the defendants are not allowed to waive trial by
442:"Trial by jury returns to Japan Thousands queue to witness historic change to country's criminal justice system"
863:
110:
101:
In many respects, the new system is very different from a common law jury system. It is not a (lay) jury of an
44:
570:"The Slow Birth of Japan's Quasi-Jury System (Saiban-in Seido): Interim Report on the Road to Commencement"
545:
441:
241:
942:
680:
302:
Act
Concerning Participation of Lay Assessors in Criminal Trials (Assessor Act), May 28, 2004, Art. 67.
20:
348:
Act
Concerning Participation of Lay Assessors in Criminal Trials (Assessor Act), May 28, 2004, Art. 1.
311:
Act
Concerning Participation of Lay Assessors in Criminal Trials (Assessor Act), May 28, 2004, Art. 6.
878:
807:
797:
515:
420:
106:
40:
802:
774:
759:
737:
644:
102:
569:
717:
685:
48:
817:
769:
722:
415:
67:) in trials for certain severe crimes. Citizens chosen for such service, called "saiban-in"
947:
792:
285:
51:– who actively analyze and investigate evidence presented by the defense and prosecution.
498:
218:
178:
Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.
784:
742:
472:
361:
17:
388:
936:
837:
754:
637:
590:"The New Japanese Jury System: Empowering the Public, Preserving Continental Justice"
546:"The Jury System in Pre-War Japan: An Annotated Translation of "The Jury Guidebook" (
242:"The Jury System in Pre-War Japan: An Annotated Translation of "The Jury Guidebook" (
60:
539:(note that the translation differs in some regards from the law as finally enacted).
832:
727:
446:
24:
827:
764:
702:
695:
690:
675:
114:
is mainly the referee of court procedure and decides only the applicable law.
36:
327:
31:. Lay judges comprise the majority of the judicial panel. They do not form a
747:
732:
712:
707:
28:
269:
Haley, JO, The Spirit of
Japanese Law, Univ. of Georgia Press, 1998, p. 52.
63:
passed a law requiring selected citizens to participate as judges (and not
393:
629:
129:
veto on any conviction that would be delivered by the lay judges. The
64:
328:"Japan's New Citizen Judges: How Secrecy Imperils Judicial Reform"
660:
522:
Act
Concerning Participation of Lay Assessors in Criminal Trials
32:
633:
158:
139:
16:
A system for trial by jury was first introduced in 1923 under
366:"In First Return to Japan Court, Jurors Convict and Sentence"
105:
of common law but one that involves a (lay) "judge" found in
43:
judges next to professional judges in accordance with the
200:
judges and that cases are not examined in enough detail.
542:
Re. history and development of the pre-war jury system:
298:
296:
914:
846:
783:
668:
499:"Early Returns from Japan's New Criminal Trials"
219:"Early Returns from Japan's New Criminal Trials"
70:
645:
568:Anderson, Kent; Ambler, Leah (1 April 2006).
326:Levin, Mark A.; Tice, Virginia (9 May 2009).
8:
624:Government video explaining new jury system
514:Anderson, Kent; Saint, Emma (Winter 2005).
281:"Ichihashi trial key test of legal reforms"
652:
638:
630:
356:
354:
468:"Japan Learns Dreaded Task of Jury Duty"
47:legal tradition – similar to the French
39:system, but participate in the trial as
813:Racial discrimination in jury selection
520:) Law: An Annotated Translation of the
321:
319:
317:
209:
557:Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal
531:Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal
497:Johnson, David T. (7 September 2009).
253:Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal
217:Johnson, David T. (7 September 2009).
503:The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
332:The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
223:The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
7:
93:system was implemented in May 2009.
146:First lay judge trial under new law
466:Onishi, Norimitsu (16 July 2007).
389:"Japan's landmark jury trial ends"
364:; McDonald, Mark (6 August 2009),
279:Green, Stephen (8 December 2009).
35:separate from the judges, as in a
14:
577:Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht
440:McCurry, Justin (3 August 2009),
163:
922:Fully Informed Jury Association
414:Wallacy, Mark (6 August 2009),
1:
588:Weber, Ingram (Spring 2009).
615:Saiban-in (Lay Judge) System
544:Dobrovolskaia, Anna (2008).
240:Dobrovolskaia, Anna (2008).
416:"Japan revives jury trials"
964:
823:Scientific jury selection
172:This section needs to be
71:
847:Specific jurisdictions
516:"Japan's Quasi-Jury (
107:inquisitorial systems
59:On May 28, 2004, the
808:Peremptory challenge
798:Death-qualified jury
597:East Asia Law Review
619:Ministry of Justice
131:Ministry of Justice
803:Jury questionnaire
775:Summary jury trial
760:Jury sequestration
738:Jury nullification
681:Citizens' assembly
103:adversarial system
930:
929:
859:England and Wales
718:Jury instructions
663:-related articles
193:
192:
955:
818:Strike for cause
770:Juror misconduct
723:Specific finding
669:Primary articles
654:
647:
640:
631:
604:
594:
584:
574:
564:
554:
538:
528:
510:
484:
483:
481:
480:
463:
457:
456:
455:
454:
437:
431:
430:
429:
428:
411:
405:
404:
403:
402:
385:
379:
378:
377:
376:
358:
349:
346:
340:
339:
323:
312:
309:
303:
300:
291:
290:
276:
270:
267:
261:
260:
250:
237:
231:
230:
214:
188:
185:
179:
167:
166:
159:
76:
74:
73:
963:
962:
958:
957:
956:
954:
953:
952:
933:
932:
931:
926:
910:
842:
793:Change of venue
779:
664:
658:
611:
592:
587:
572:
567:
552:
543:
526:
513:
496:
493:
488:
487:
478:
476:
465:
464:
460:
452:
450:
439:
438:
434:
426:
424:
413:
412:
408:
400:
398:
397:, 6 August 2009
387:
386:
382:
374:
372:
362:Tabuchi, Hiroko
360:
359:
352:
347:
343:
325:
324:
315:
310:
306:
301:
294:
286:The Japan Times
278:
277:
273:
268:
264:
248:
239:
238:
234:
216:
215:
211:
206:
189:
183:
180:
177:
168:
164:
157:
148:
99:
68:
57:
21:Katō Tomosaburō
12:
11:
5:
961:
959:
951:
950:
945:
935:
934:
928:
927:
925:
924:
918:
916:
912:
911:
909:
908:
907:
906:
901:
896:
894:Jury selection
891:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
850:
848:
844:
843:
841:
840:
835:
830:
825:
820:
815:
810:
805:
800:
795:
789:
787:
785:Jury selection
781:
780:
778:
777:
772:
767:
762:
757:
752:
751:
750:
743:Jury tampering
740:
735:
730:
725:
720:
715:
710:
705:
700:
699:
698:
688:
686:Coroner's jury
683:
678:
672:
670:
666:
665:
659:
657:
656:
649:
642:
634:
628:
627:
621:
610:
609:External links
607:
606:
605:
585:
565:
548:Baishin Tebiki
540:
511:
492:
489:
486:
485:
473:New York Times
458:
432:
406:
380:
370:New York Times
350:
341:
313:
304:
292:
271:
262:
244:Baishin Tebiki
232:
208:
207:
205:
202:
191:
190:
171:
169:
162:
156:
153:
147:
144:
98:
95:
75:, "lay judge")
56:
55:Current system
53:
49:cour d'assises
18:Prime Minister
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
960:
949:
946:
944:
941:
940:
938:
923:
920:
919:
917:
913:
905:
902:
900:
899:Nullification
897:
895:
892:
890:
889:U.S. military
887:
886:
885:
884:United States
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
851:
849:
845:
839:
838:Stealth juror
836:
834:
831:
829:
826:
824:
821:
819:
816:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
796:
794:
791:
790:
788:
786:
782:
776:
773:
771:
768:
766:
763:
761:
758:
756:
755:Jury research
753:
749:
746:
745:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
731:
729:
726:
724:
721:
719:
716:
714:
711:
709:
706:
704:
701:
697:
694:
693:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
673:
671:
667:
662:
655:
650:
648:
643:
641:
636:
635:
632:
625:
622:
620:
616:
613:
612:
608:
602:
598:
591:
586:
582:
578:
571:
566:
562:
558:
551:
549:
541:
536:
532:
525:
523:
519:
512:
508:
504:
500:
495:
494:
490:
475:
474:
469:
462:
459:
449:
448:
443:
436:
433:
423:
422:
417:
410:
407:
396:
395:
390:
384:
381:
371:
367:
363:
357:
355:
351:
345:
342:
337:
333:
329:
322:
320:
318:
314:
308:
305:
299:
297:
293:
288:
287:
282:
275:
272:
266:
263:
258:
254:
247:
245:
236:
233:
228:
224:
220:
213:
210:
203:
201:
197:
187:
175:
170:
161:
160:
154:
152:
145:
143:
141:
135:
132:
128:
123:
119:
115:
112:
108:
104:
96:
94:
92:
88:
84:
80:
66:
62:
61:National Diet
54:
52:
50:
46:
42:
41:inquisitorial
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
19:
943:Law of Japan
868:
833:Special jury
728:Deliberation
600:
596:
583:(21): 55–80.
580:
576:
560:
556:
547:
534:
530:
521:
517:
506:
502:
491:Bibliography
477:. Retrieved
471:
461:
451:, retrieved
447:The Guardian
445:
435:
425:, retrieved
419:
409:
399:, retrieved
392:
383:
373:, retrieved
369:
344:
335:
331:
307:
284:
274:
265:
256:
252:
243:
235:
226:
222:
212:
198:
194:
181:
173:
149:
136:
126:
124:
120:
116:
100:
90:
86:
82:
78:
58:
25:World War II
15:
828:Struck jury
765:Jury stress
155:Controversy
937:Categories
703:Petit jury
696:Indictment
691:Grand jury
676:Jury trial
626:(Japanese)
479:2007-07-16
453:2009-08-06
427:2009-08-06
401:2009-08-06
375:2009-08-06
204:References
184:March 2014
37:common law
29:lay judges
864:Hong Kong
748:Embracery
733:Hung jury
713:Jury fees
708:Jury duty
518:Saiban-in
259:(2): 238.
111:civil law
91:saiban-in
87:saiban-in
83:saiban-in
79:saiban-in
45:civil law
874:Scotland
421:ABC News
394:BBC News
127:de facto
174:updated
97:Process
948:Juries
915:Groups
879:Taiwan
854:Canada
89:. The
65:juries
904:Women
869:Japan
593:(PDF)
573:(PDF)
553:(PDF)
527:(PDF)
509:(36).
338:(19).
249:(PDF)
229:(36).
661:Jury
603:(1).
563:(2).
537:(1).
33:jury
140:yen
109:of
72:裁判員
939::
617:,
599:.
595:.
581:11
579:.
575:.
559:.
555:.
550:)"
533:.
529:.
505:.
501:.
470:.
444:,
418:,
391:,
368:,
353:^
334:.
330:.
316:^
295:^
283:.
255:.
251:.
246:)"
225:.
221:.
142:.
653:e
646:t
639:v
601:4
561:9
535:6
524:"
507:7
482:.
336:7
289:.
257:9
227:7
186:)
182:(
176:.
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.