188:. The benefit of team or shared learning is that staff learn more quickly and the problem solving capacity of the organization is improved through better access to knowledge and expertise. Learning organizations have structures that facilitate team learning with features such as boundary crossing and openness. In team meetings members can learn better from each other by concentrating on listening, avoiding interruption, being interested and responding. In such a learning environment, people don't have to hide or overlook their disagreements, so they make their collective understanding richer. Three dimensions of team learning, according to Senge, are: "the ability to think insightfully about complex issues", "the ability to take innovative, coordinated action", and "the ability to create a network that will allow other teams to take action as well". In a learning organization, teams learn how to think together. Team learning is process of adapting and developing the team capacity to create the results that its members really want. Team learning requires individuals to engage in dialogue and discussion; therefore team members must develop open communication, shared meaning, and shared understanding. Learning organizations typically have excellent knowledge management structures, allowing creation, acquisition, dissemination, and implementation of this knowledge in the organization. Teams use tools such as an
158:. Personal mental models describe what people can or cannot detect. Due to selective observation, mental models might limit peoples’ observations. To become a learning organization, these models must be identified and challenged. Individuals tend to espouse theories, which are what they intend to follow, and theories-in-use, which are what they actually do. Similarly, organizations tend to have 'memories' which preserve certain behaviours, norms and values. In creating a learning environment it is important to replace confrontational attitudes with an open culture that promotes inquiry and trust. To achieve this, the learning organization needs mechanisms for locating and assessing organizational theories of action. Unwanted values need to be discarded in a process called 'unlearning'. Wang and Ahmed refer to this as 'triple loop learning'. For organizations, problems arise when mental models evolve beneath the level of awareness. Thus it is important to examine business issues and actively question current business practices and new skills before they become integrated into new practices.
263:
new experience and knowledge keeps the organization dynamic and prepared for change. In an ever-changing institutional environment this can be a key factor for an advantage. Better management of an organizations explorative investments and exploitative acting can be a benefit of a learning organization, too. Next, a competitive advantage of a company can be gained by lower prices and better quality of products. Through organizational learning both cost leadership and differentiation strategies are possible. The ability to reconfigure actions based on needs and environment avoids the tradeoff between the two. Overall the customer performance of learning organizations might be better, which is the direct and measurable channel, that establishes a competitive advantage. Another important aspect is innovation. Innovation and learning are closely related. While encouraging people to learn and develop, a more innovative environment is commonly generated, innovative ideas coming from e.g. communities of practice can result in greater overall organizational learning.
125:. This is a conceptual framework that allows people to study businesses as bounded objects. Learning organizations use this method of thinking when assessing their company and have information systems that measure the performance of the organization as a whole and of its various components. Systems thinking states that all the characteristics of a learning organization must be apparent at once in an organization for it to be a learning organization. If some of these characteristics are missing then the organization will fall short of its goal. However, O'Keeffe believes that the characteristics of a learning organization are factors that are gradually acquired, rather than developed simultaneously.
138:
mastery appears also in a spiritual way as, for example, clarification of focus, personal vision and ability to see and interpret reality objectively. Individual learning is acquired through staff training, development and continuous self-improvement; however, learning cannot be forced upon an individual who is not receptive to learning. Research shows that most learning in the workplace is incidental, rather than the product of formal training, therefore it is important to develop a culture where personal mastery is practiced in daily life. A learning organization has been described as the sum of individual learning, but there must be mechanisms for individual learning to be transferred into
25:
341:
initiatives alone. They believe that by referring to the notion of the learning organization it was possible to make change less threatening and more acceptable to participants. 'However, individual and collective learning, which has undoubtedly taken place, has not really been connected to organizational change and transformation'. Part of the issue, they suggest, has to do with the concept of the learning organization itself. They argue that the concept of the learning organization:
333:. When the number of employees exceeds 150, internal knowledge sharing dramatically decreases because of higher complexity in the formal organizational structure, weaker inter-employee relationships, lower trust, reduced connective efficacy, and less effective communication. As such, as the size of an organizational unit increases, the effectiveness of internal knowledge flows dramatically diminishes and the degree of intra-organizational knowledge sharing decreases.
326:. Unless implemented coherently across the organization, learning can be viewed as elitist and restricted to senior levels. In that case, learning will not be viewed as a shared vision. If training and development is compulsory, it can be viewed as a form of control, rather than as personal development. Learning and the pursuit of personal mastery needs to be an individual choice, therefore enforced take-up will not work.
359:(such as Dixon 1994) assume such a link. It is, therefore, imperative 'that the link between individual and collective learning and the organization's strategic objectives is made'. This shortcoming, Finger and Brand argue, makes a case for some form of measurement of organizational learning – so that it is possible to assess the extent to which such learning contributes or not towards strategic objectives.
234:. With a repository of information and a knowledge infrastructure, that simplifies the creation of knowledge in a practical form, an organization will have all its knowledge available for everyone in the organization, which will further help the learning in the organization. For example, USAID has a number of technical website platforms focused on development topics including
373:
organization. The team may not be able to commit the time if an institution does not have the appropriate help or training. For an organization to be able to change, it needs to know the steps necessary to solve the problems it faces. As a solution, a mentor or coach who is well versed in the learning organization concept may be necessary.
213:) and re-emerge in the future. To remain competitive, many organizations have restructured, with fewer people in the company. This means those who remain need to work more effectively. To create a competitive advantage, companies need to learn faster than their competitors and to develop a customer responsive
392:
Some of the issues that learning organizations were designed to address within institutions is fragmentation, competition and reactiveness. Fragmentation is described as breaking a problem into pieces. For example, each organization has an accounting department, finance, operations, IT and marketing.
380:
A usual challenge with many organizations is the lack of concentration on personal development while focusing mainly on professional development which is more likely to have a direct contribution to organization's performance whereas personal development's positive results appear more in the long run
226:
knowledge to the new information. The most useful knowledge is rarely something that is formed in one’s head and then diffused to others. Useful knowledge generally consists of different pieces of information which are then combined. For the gathering of information, organizations need some sort of a
340:
Based on their study of attempts to reform the Swiss Postal
Service, Matthias Finger and Silvia Bűrgin Brand (1999) provide a useful listing of more important shortcomings of the learning organization concept. They conclude that it is not possible to transform a bureaucratic organization by learning
262:
One of the main benefits being a learning organization offers is a competitive advantage. This competitive advantage can be founded on different strategies, which can be acquired by organizational learning. One way of gaining a competitive advantage is strategic flexibility. The continuous inflow of
166:
The development of a shared vision is important in motivating the staff to learn, as it creates a common identity that provides focus and energy for learning. The most successful visions build on the individual visions of the employees at all levels of the organization, thus the creation of a shared
313:
points out, that 'to empower people in an unaligned organization can be counterproductive'. In other words, if individuals do not engage with a shared vision, personal mastery could be used to advance their own personal visions. In some organizations a lack of a learning culture can be a barrier to
221:
identified that organizations need to maintain knowledge about new products and processes, understand what is happening in the outside environment and produce creative solutions using the knowledge and skills of all within the organization. This requires co-operation between individuals and groups,
208:
Organizations do not organically develop into learning organizations; there are factors prompting their change. As organizations grow, they lose their capacity to learn as company structures and individual thinking becomes rigid. When problems arise, the proposed solutions often turn out to be only
175:
states that these are transitory goals and suggests that there should also be long-term goals that are intrinsic within the company. On the other hand, the lack of clearly defined goals can negatively affect the organisation, as it cannot attain its members trust. Applying the practices of a shared
396:
Inappropriate habits while organizing team meetings can effect negatively. Meetings should be prepared in time, agenda drawn up and enough time dedicated to focus on the subjects. Because best results in team learning form through discipline, it is essential to have an agenda, make atmosphere open
376:
Also, the change may not be relevant to the organization's needs. Time should be spent on the actual issues of the organization and its daily issues. To combat this challenge, a strategy must be built. The organization should determine what its problems are before entering into the transformation.
321:
Resistance to learning can occur within a learning organization if there is not sufficient buy-in at an individual level. This is often encountered with people who feel threatened by change or believe that they have the most to lose. They are likely to have closed mind sets, and are not willing to
225:
For any learning to take place, also in organizations, there needs to be diffusion of knowledge. Diffusion is not always easy to perform, since it depends on the recipient’s willingness to accept the new knowledge, their need of the new information and the relationship of their existing
137:
for an organization whose workforce can learn more quickly than the workforce of other organizations. Learning is considered to be more than just acquiring information; it is expanding the ability to be more productive by learning how to apply our skills to work in the most valuable way. Personal
372:
states there are many reasons why an organization may have trouble in transforming itself into a learning organization. The first is that an organization does not have enough time. Employees and management may have other issues that take priority over trying to change the culture of their
336:
Problems with Senge's vision include a failure to fully appreciate and incorporate the imperatives that animate modern organizations; the relative sophistication of the thinking he requires of managers (and whether many in practice are up to it); and questions regarding his treatment of
176:
vision creates a suitable environment for the development of trust through communication and collaboration within the organization. As a result, the built shared vision encourages the members to share their own experiences and opinions, thus enhancing effects of organizational learning.
304:
Even within or without learning organization, problems can stall the process of learning or cause it to regress. Most of them arise from an organization not fully embracing all the necessary facets. Once these problems can be identified, work can begin on improving them.
314:
learning. An environment must be created where individuals can share learning without it being devalued and ignored, so more people can benefit from their knowledge and the individuals becomes empowered. A learning organization needs to fully accept the removal of
106:
stated in an interview that a learning organization is a group of people working together collectively to enhance their capacities to create results they really care about. Senge popularized the concept of the learning organization through his book
393:
Competition occurs when employees are trying to do better or 'beat' others in an assignment instead of collaborating. Reactiveness occurs when an organization changes only in reaction to outside forces, rather than proactively initiating change.
348:
To transform an organization, it is necessary to attend to structures and the organization of work as well as the culture and processes. 'Focussing exclusively on training activities in order to foster learning... favours this purely cultural
308:
Some organizations find it hard to embrace personal mastery because as a concept it is intangible and the benefits cannot be quantified; personal mastery can even be seen as a threat to the organization. This threat can be real, as
337:
organizational politics. It is certainly difficult to find real-life examples of learning organizations (Kerka 1995). There has also been a lack of critical analysis of the theoretical framework.
894:
Santos- Vijande, M.L.; López-Sánchez, J. Á.; Trespalacios, J. A. (2012). "How organizational learning affects a firm's flexibility, competitive strategy, and performance".
749:
Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., & Smith, B. J. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization.
353:
Favours individual and collective learning processes at all levels of the organization, but does not connect them properly to the organization's strategic objectives.
167:
vision can be hindered by traditional structures where the company vision is imposed from above. Therefore, learning organizations tend to have flat, decentralized
1089:
921:
Hurley, R.F.; Hult, G. T. M. (1998). "Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination".
146:, self-motivation, sense of responsibility, commitment, patience and focus on relevant matters as well as work-life balance and well-being.
81:
that facilitates the learning of its members and continuously transforms itself. The concept was coined through the work and research of
974:
Senge, Peter., Kleiner, Art., Ross, Richard., Roth, George., Smith, Bryan. (1999). "The Dance of Change" New York: Currency
Doubleday.
686:
60:
377:
Training should remain linked to business results so that it is easier for employees to connect the training with everyday issues.
441:
346:
Focuses mainly on the cultural dimension and does not adequately take into account the other dimensions of an organization.
88:
Learning organizations may develop as a result of the pressures facing modern organizations; this enables them to remain
384:
As for the leader, it may be challenging not to consider one's own personal vision as the organization's shared vision.
784:
Huffman, Jane (December 2003). "The Role of Shared Values and Vision in
Creating Professional Learning Communities".
33:
761:
Easterby-Smith, M. , Crossan, M., and
Nicolini, D. 2000. Organizational learning: debates past, present and future.
823:
Senge, P. et al. (1994) The Fifth
Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization.
1084:
100:
There are many definitions of a learning organization as well as typologies of kinds of learning organizations.
834:
168:
879:
King, W. R. (1996) ‘IS and the
Learning Organization’, Information Systems Management, 13(3), 78–80.
714:
McHugh, D., Groves, D. and Alker, A. 1998. Managing learning: what do we learn from a learning organization?
436:
356:
139:
1094:
421:
231:
406:
134:
200:. For the cycle to be complete, it has to include all five characteristics which are mentioned above.
1066:
416:
210:
109:
133:
The commitment by an individual to the process of learning is known as personal mastery. There is a
39:
1050:
Senge, Peter M.; Kleiner, Art; Roberts, Charlotte; Ross
Richard B.; Smith, Bryan J. (eds.) (1994).
446:
938:
801:
230:
for all the information. These repositories are nowadays usually built with the aid of
227:
682:
411:
330:
498:
930:
903:
793:
122:
495:
The new paradigm in business: Emerging strategies for leadership and organizational change
431:
280:
214:
189:
956:
142:. Personal mastery makes possible many positive outcomes such as individual performance,
197:
1059:
Sculpting the
Learning Organization: Lessons in the Art and Science of Systemic Change
1078:
942:
805:
731:
Bui, Hong; Baruch, Yehuda. "Creating learning organizations: A systems perspective".
218:
185:
143:
839:
426:
323:
155:
1038:
Working Wisdom: Timeless Skills and
Vanguard Strategies for Learning Organizations
907:
154:
Assumptions and generalizations held by individuals and organizations are called
679:
A validation of the learning organization as a driver of performance improvement
310:
172:
103:
89:
82:
934:
797:
660:
Wang, C.L. and Ahmed, P.K. 2003. Organizational learning: a critical review.
861:
Hipsher, Brian; Grant
Lindstrom; Don Parks (1997). "The Strategic Dilemma".
553:
A Conversation with Peter Senge: New Developments in Organizational Learning
315:
786:
National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bulletin; Reston
121:
The idea of the learning organization developed from a body of work called
193:
1024:
Learning in Action: A Guide to Putting the Learning Organization to Work
493:
Senge, P. M. (1990). The art and practice of the learning organization.
1067:
The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization
171:. The shared vision is often to succeed against a competitor; however,
78:
1045:
Learning Organizations: Developing Cultures for Tomorrow's Workplace
985:
Learning Organizations: Developing Cultures for Tomorrow's Workplace
957:
Organizational size and knowledge flow: A proposed theoretical link.
329:
In addition, organizational size may become the barrier to internal
397:
and respect others: avoid interruption, be interested and respond.
251:
774:
Senge, P. M. (1992). Mental models. Planning review, 20(2), 4-44.
235:
1031:
Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning Within the Unknowable
538:
O'Keeffe, T. 2002. Organizational Learning: a new perspective.
273:
Having the knowledge to better link resources to customer needs
113:. In the book, he proposed the following five characteristics:
45:
You can help by providing page numbers for existing citations.
18:
247:
239:
482:
The Learning Company: A strategy for sustainable development
243:
364:
Challenges in the transformation to a learning organization
499:
http://www.giee.ntnu.edu.tw/files/archive/380_9e53918d.pdf
270:
Maintaining levels of innovation and remaining competitive
222:
free and reliable communication, and a culture of trust.
1015:
Papa, M. J., Daniels, T. D., & Spiker, B. K. (2008).
1017:
Organizational Communication: Perspectives and Trends
286:
Increasing the pace of change within the organization
289:
Strengthening sense of community in the organization
184:
The accumulation of individual learning constitutes
1070:(Revised edition). New York: Currency/Doubleday.
1057:Watkins, Karen E.; Marsick, Victoria J. (1993).
1003:The Oxford Handbook of the Learning Organization
480:Pedler, M., Burgogyne, J. and Boydell, T. 1997.
266:Other benefits of a learning organization are:
1043:Chawla, Sarita; Renesch, John (eds.) (1995).
955:Serenko, A., Bontis, N. and Hardie, T. 2007.
889:
887:
885:
551:Fulmer, Robert M., Keys, J. Bernard. (1998).
8:
209:short-term (single-loop learning instead of
987:. Portland, OR: Productivity Press (p. 16).
983:Chawla, Sarita & Renesch, John (1995).
196:. Team learning is only one element of the
970:
968:
388:Problems organizational learning addresses
276:Improving quality of outputs at all levels
835:"Team learning: More than group thinking"
672:
670:
61:Learn how and when to remove this message
1026:. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
606:
604:
602:
600:
598:
596:
594:
592:
590:
476:
474:
472:
470:
468:
466:
464:
462:
1036:Aubrey, Robert; Cohen, Paul M. (1995).
757:
755:
642:. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
588:
586:
584:
582:
580:
578:
576:
574:
572:
570:
555:Organizational Dynamics, 27 (2), 33-42.
540:Journal of European Industrial Training
458:
726:
724:
710:
708:
706:
704:
702:
700:
698:
656:
654:
652:
650:
648:
819:
817:
815:
634:
632:
630:
628:
626:
624:
622:
620:
534:
532:
530:
528:
526:
7:
1010:Handbook of Organization Development
1005:. New York: Oxford University Press.
524:
522:
520:
518:
516:
514:
512:
510:
508:
506:
1047:. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
1019:. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
564:Learning Organizations (2005) p.190
316:traditional hierarchical structures
292:Improving long term decision making
1008:Cummings, Thomas G. (ed.) (2008).
14:
833:Fitzgerald, Donna (5 May 2003).
283:by becoming more people oriented
23:
960:Journal of Intellectual Capital
863:Journal of Business and Society
442:Professional learning community
1052:The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook
1033:. London; New York: Routledge.
484:. 2nd Ed. London; McGraw-Hill.
1:
1090:Social information processing
1064:Senge, Peter M. (1990/2006).
1061:. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
1054:New York: Currency Doubleday.
1040:. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
1001:Örtenblad, Anders R. (2020).
908:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.002
763:Journal of Management Studies
92:in the business environment.
896:Journal of Business Research
614:. London: Century Business.
295:Improving knowledge sharing
1111:
935:10.1177/002224299806200303
798:10.1177/019263650308763703
640:On Organizational Learning
497:, 126-138. Retrieved from
73:In business management, a
1029:Flood, Robert L. (1999).
1022:Garvin, David A. (2000).
733:The Learning Organization
716:The Learning Organization
662:The learning organization
169:organizational structures
923:The Journal of Marketing
677:Herrera, David (2007).
437:Organizational learning
357:organizational learning
140:organizational learning
32:This article cites its
681:. Capella University.
542:, 26 (2), pp. 130-141.
422:Knowledge organization
232:information technology
962:, 8 (4), pp. 610-627.
638:Argyris, Chris 1999.
407:Community of practice
135:competitive advantage
75:learning organization
1012:. Los Angeles: Sage.
612:The Fifth Discipline
417:Knowledge management
211:double-loop learning
110:The Fifth Discipline
85:and his colleagues.
765:. 37(6) pp 783-796.
718:. 5 (5) pp.209-220.
447:Reflective practice
370:The Dance of Change
664:, 10 (1) pp. 8-17.
610:Senge, P.M. 1990.
381:and less visibly.
355:Popular models of
228:content repository
412:Knowledge capture
331:knowledge sharing
71:
70:
63:
38:does not provide
1102:
1085:Systems thinking
988:
981:
975:
972:
963:
953:
947:
946:
918:
912:
911:
902:(8): 1079–1089.
891:
880:
877:
871:
870:
858:
852:
851:
849:
847:
830:
824:
821:
810:
809:
781:
775:
772:
766:
759:
750:
747:
741:
740:
728:
719:
712:
693:
692:
674:
665:
658:
643:
636:
615:
608:
565:
562:
556:
549:
543:
536:
501:
491:
485:
478:
129:Personal mastery
123:systems thinking
117:Systems thinking
66:
59:
55:
52:
46:
27:
26:
19:
1110:
1109:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1099:
1075:
1074:
1073:
997:
995:Further reading
992:
991:
982:
978:
973:
966:
954:
950:
920:
919:
915:
893:
892:
883:
878:
874:
860:
859:
855:
845:
843:
832:
831:
827:
822:
813:
783:
782:
778:
773:
769:
760:
753:
748:
744:
730:
729:
722:
713:
696:
689:
676:
675:
668:
659:
646:
637:
618:
609:
568:
563:
559:
550:
546:
537:
504:
492:
488:
479:
460:
455:
432:Learning agenda
403:
390:
366:
302:
281:corporate image
260:
252:ResilienceLinks
206:
190:action learning
182:
164:
152:
131:
119:
98:
96:Characteristics
67:
56:
50:
47:
44:
40:page references
28:
24:
17:
16:Type of company
12:
11:
5:
1108:
1106:
1098:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1077:
1076:
1072:
1071:
1062:
1055:
1048:
1041:
1034:
1027:
1020:
1013:
1006:
998:
996:
993:
990:
989:
976:
964:
948:
913:
881:
872:
853:
825:
811:
792:(637): 21–34.
776:
767:
751:
742:
720:
694:
687:
666:
644:
616:
566:
557:
544:
502:
486:
457:
456:
454:
451:
450:
449:
444:
439:
434:
429:
424:
419:
414:
409:
402:
399:
389:
386:
365:
362:
361:
360:
350:
301:
298:
297:
296:
293:
290:
287:
284:
277:
274:
271:
259:
256:
205:
202:
198:learning cycle
181:
178:
163:
160:
151:
148:
130:
127:
118:
115:
97:
94:
69:
68:
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1107:
1096:
1095:Communication
1093:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1082:
1080:
1069:
1068:
1063:
1060:
1056:
1053:
1049:
1046:
1042:
1039:
1035:
1032:
1028:
1025:
1021:
1018:
1014:
1011:
1007:
1004:
1000:
999:
994:
986:
980:
977:
971:
969:
965:
961:
958:
952:
949:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
917:
914:
909:
905:
901:
897:
890:
888:
886:
882:
876:
873:
868:
864:
857:
854:
842:
841:
836:
829:
826:
820:
818:
816:
812:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
780:
777:
771:
768:
764:
758:
756:
752:
746:
743:
738:
734:
727:
725:
721:
717:
711:
709:
707:
705:
703:
701:
699:
695:
690:
688:9780549127895
684:
680:
673:
671:
667:
663:
657:
655:
653:
651:
649:
645:
641:
635:
633:
631:
629:
627:
625:
623:
621:
617:
613:
607:
605:
603:
601:
599:
597:
595:
593:
591:
589:
587:
585:
583:
581:
579:
577:
575:
573:
571:
567:
561:
558:
554:
548:
545:
541:
535:
533:
531:
529:
527:
525:
523:
521:
519:
517:
515:
513:
511:
509:
507:
503:
500:
496:
490:
487:
483:
477:
475:
473:
471:
469:
467:
465:
463:
459:
452:
448:
445:
443:
440:
438:
435:
433:
430:
428:
425:
423:
420:
418:
415:
413:
410:
408:
405:
404:
400:
398:
394:
387:
385:
382:
378:
374:
371:
363:
358:
354:
351:
347:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
332:
327:
325:
324:mental models
319:
317:
312:
306:
299:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
278:
275:
272:
269:
268:
267:
264:
257:
255:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
223:
220:
219:Chris Argyris
216:
212:
203:
201:
199:
195:
191:
187:
186:team learning
180:Team learning
179:
177:
174:
170:
162:Shared vision
161:
159:
157:
156:mental models
150:Mental models
149:
147:
145:
144:self-efficacy
141:
136:
128:
126:
124:
116:
114:
112:
111:
105:
101:
95:
93:
91:
86:
84:
80:
76:
65:
62:
54:
51:December 2020
42:
41:
35:
30:
21:
20:
1065:
1058:
1051:
1044:
1037:
1030:
1023:
1016:
1009:
1002:
984:
979:
959:
951:
929:(3): 42–54.
926:
922:
916:
899:
895:
875:
866:
862:
856:
844:. Retrieved
840:TechRepublic
838:
828:
789:
785:
779:
770:
762:
745:
736:
732:
715:
678:
661:
639:
611:
560:
552:
547:
539:
494:
489:
481:
427:Lean startup
395:
391:
383:
379:
375:
369:
367:
352:
345:
339:
335:
328:
322:engage with
320:
307:
303:
265:
261:
236:Learning Lab
224:
207:
183:
165:
153:
132:
120:
108:
102:
99:
87:
74:
72:
57:
48:
37:
846:15 December
204:Development
104:Peter Senge
90:competitive
83:Peter Senge
1079:Categories
453:References
279:Improving
192:cycle and
943:167786554
869:(2): 184.
806:102338000
368:The book
240:AgriLinks
401:See also
300:Barriers
258:Benefits
248:Edulinks
244:DRGLinks
194:dialogue
215:culture
79:company
34:sources
941:
804:
685:
349:bias'.
939:S2CID
802:S2CID
311:Senge
173:Senge
77:is a
848:2020
739:(3).
683:ISBN
250:and
36:but
931:doi
904:doi
794:doi
254:.
1081::
967:^
937:.
927:62
925:.
900:65
898:.
884:^
867:10
865:.
837:.
814:^
800:.
790:87
788:.
754:^
737:17
735:.
723:^
697:^
669:^
647:^
619:^
569:^
505:^
461:^
318:.
246:,
242:,
238:,
217:.
945:.
933::
910:.
906::
850:.
808:.
796::
691:.
64:)
58:(
53:)
49:(
43:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.