50:, every legal action seeking redress of a wrong or enforcement of a right is "a syllogism of which the major premise is the proposition of law involved, the minor premise is the proposition of fact, and the judgment the conclusion." More broadly, many sources suggest that every good legal argument is cast in the form of a syllogism.
240:
289:
258:
220:
189:
139:
281:
316:
73:" already. This model is sufficiently broad so that it may be applied in many different nations and legal systems.
181:
131:
77:
94:
76:
In legal theoretic literature, legal syllogism is controversial. It is treated as equivalent to an “
19:
is a legal concept concerning the law and its application, specifically a form of argument based on
99:
20:
250:
311:
285:
254:
216:
185:
135:
275:
206:
175:
125:
246:
105:
Type of syllogism (disjunctive, hypothetical, legal, poly-, prosleptic, quasi-, statistical)
236:
62:
54:
305:
66:
58:
212:
70:
104:
89:
27:
53:
Fundamentally, the syllogism may be reduced to a three step process: 1. "
47:
208:
Legal
Argument: The Structure and Language of Effective Advocacy
177:
Failures of
American Civil Justice in International Perspective
23:
and seeking to establish whether a specified act is lawful.
242:
Rhetoric and The Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal
Reasoning
274:
Stelmach, Jerzy; Brozek, Bartosz (3 September 2006).
30:is a form of logical reasoning that hinges on a
69:. That protocol presupposes someone has done "
8:
169:
167:
165:
163:
251:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571246.001.0001
124:Gold, Michael Evan (October 15, 2018).
116:
174:Maxeiner, James R. (August 29, 2011).
7:
205:Gardner, James A. (June 1, 2007).
14:
157:, 33 Conn. 237, 248 (Conn. 1866).
1:
245:. Oxford Scholarship Online.
127:A Primer on Legal Reasoning
333:
277:Methods of Legal Reasoning
182:Cambridge University Press
78:interpretational decision
132:Cornell University Press
239:(January 2010) . "3".
211:. Newark, New Jersey:
155:Lamphear v. Buckingham
317:Legal interpretation
130:. Ithaca, New York:
95:Case-based reasoning
100:Deductive reasoning
21:deductive reasoning
215:. pp. 27–28.
134:. pp. 82–84.
324:
296:
295:
271:
265:
264:
237:MacCormick, Neil
233:
227:
226:
202:
196:
195:
171:
158:
152:
146:
145:
121:
332:
331:
327:
326:
325:
323:
322:
321:
302:
301:
300:
299:
292:
273:
272:
268:
261:
235:
234:
230:
223:
204:
203:
199:
192:
173:
172:
161:
153:
149:
142:
123:
122:
118:
113:
86:
17:Legal syllogism
12:
11:
5:
330:
328:
320:
319:
314:
304:
303:
298:
297:
290:
284:. p. 27.
266:
259:
228:
221:
197:
190:
184:. p. 15.
159:
147:
140:
115:
114:
112:
109:
108:
107:
102:
97:
92:
85:
82:
46:. If properly
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
329:
318:
315:
313:
310:
309:
307:
293:
291:9781402049392
287:
283:
280:. Dordrecht:
279:
278:
270:
267:
262:
260:9780199571246
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:
238:
232:
229:
224:
222:9781422418208
218:
214:
210:
209:
201:
198:
193:
191:9781139504898
187:
183:
179:
178:
170:
168:
166:
164:
160:
156:
151:
148:
143:
141:9781501728617
137:
133:
129:
128:
120:
117:
110:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
87:
83:
81:
79:
74:
72:
68:
67:Holding (law)
64:
60:
56:
51:
49:
45:
41:
40:minor premise
37:
36:major premise
33:
29:
24:
22:
18:
276:
269:
241:
231:
207:
200:
176:
154:
150:
126:
119:
75:
63:law applying
59:fact finding
52:
43:
39:
35:
31:
25:
16:
15:
55:law finding
306:Categories
213:LexisNexis
111:References
71:law making
61:", and 3."
44:conclusion
312:Reasoning
90:Syllogism
28:syllogism
282:Springer
84:See also
65:." See
32:question
57:", 2. "
288:
257:
219:
188:
138:
42:and a
48:plead
286:ISBN
255:ISBN
217:ISBN
186:ISBN
136:ISBN
38:, a
34:, a
247:doi
80:.”
308::
253:.
180:.
162:^
26:A
294:.
263:.
249::
225:.
194:.
144:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.