Knowledge

Policy analysis

Source đź“ť

859:, organizational drift, bounded rationality, and limited cognition, among others. Such policies are often called "muddling through" and represent a conservative tendency: new policies are only slightly different from old policies. Policy-makers are too short on time and other resources to make totally new policies; thus, past policies are accepted as having some legitimacy. When existing policies have sunk costs which discourage innovation, incrementalism is an easier approach than rationalism, and the policies are more politically expedient because they do not necessitate any radical redistribution of values. Such models necessarily struggle to, improve the acceptability of public policy. 217:. In its simplest form, the policy cycle, which is often depicted visually as a loop or circle, starts with the identification of the problem, proceeds to an examination of the different policy tools that could be used to respond to that problem, then goes on to the implementation stage, in which one or more policies are put into practice (e.g., a new regulation or subsidy is set in place), and then finally, once the policy has been implemented and run for a certain period, the policy is evaluated. A number of different viewpoints can be used during evaluation, including looking at a policy's effectiveness, 725:, the "father of rational models"; tt is also used by private corporations. However, many criticise the model due to some of its characteristics being impractical and relying on unrealistic assumptions. For instance, it is a difficult model to apply in the public sector because social problems can be very complex, ill-defined, and inter-dependent. The problem lies in the thinking procedure implied by the model which is linear and can face difficulties in extraordinary problems or social problems which have no sequences of happenings. 877: 795: 1171:... it determines which of the various alternative public or government policies will most achieve a given set of goals in light of the relations between the policies and the goals and in light of politically feasible courses of action, it generates information and evidence in order to help the policymaker choose the most advantageous action .... 179: 774:
However, Thomas R. Dye, the president of the Lincoln Center for Public Service, states the rational model provides a good perspective since in modern society rationality plays a central role and everything that is rational tends to be prized. Thus, it does not seem strange that "we ought to be trying
739:
The rational planning model of decision-making is a process for making sound decisions in policy-making in the public sector. Rationality is defined as “a style of behavior that is appropriate to the achievement of given goals, within the limits imposed by given conditions and constraints”. The model
712:
This model, however, has been criticized for being overly linear and simplistic. In reality, stages of the policy process may overlap or never happen. Also, this model fails to take into account the multiple factors attempting to influence the process itself as well as each other, and the complexity
416:
The strategic effects dimensions can pose certain limitations due to data collection. However the analytical dimensions of effects directly influences acceptability. The degree of acceptability is based upon the plausible definitions of actors involved in feasibility. If the feasibility dimension is
937:
There are many contemporary policies relevant to gender and workplace issues. Actors analyze contemporary gender-related employment issues ranging from parental leave and maternity programs, sexual harassment, and work/life balance to gender mainstreaming. It is by the juxtaposition of a variety of
229:
The meta-policy approach is a systems and context approach; i.e., its scope is the macro-scale and its problem interpretation is usually of a structural nature. It aims at explaining the contextual factors of the policy process; i.e., what the political, economic and socio-cultural factors are that
965:
The success of a policy can be measured by changes in the behavior of the target population and active support from various actors and institutions involved. A public policy is an authoritative communication prescribing an unambiguous course of action for specified individuals or groups in certain
862:
Criticisms of such a policy approach include: challenges to bargaining (i.e. not successful with limited resources), downplaying useful quantitative information, obscuring real relationships between political entities, an anti-intellectual approach to problems (i.e. the preclusion of imagination),
766:
The Rational planning model has also proven to be very useful to several decision making processes in industries outside the public sphere. Nonetheless, there are some who criticize the rational model due to the major problems which can be faced & which tend to arise in practice because social
472:
Policies are viewed as frameworks with the potential to optimize the general well-being. These are commonly analyzed by legislative bodies and lobbyists. Every policy analysis is intended to bring an evaluative outcome. A systemic policy analysis is meant for in depth study for addressing a social
169:
The analysis-centric (or "analycentric") approach focuses on individual problems and their solutions. Its scope is the micro-scale and its problem interpretation or problem resolution usually involves a technical solution. The primary aim is to identify the most effective and efficient solution in
206:
is defined broadly to include citizens, community groups, non-governmental organizations, businesses and even opposing political parties. By changing the relative power and influence of certain groups (e.g., enhancing public participation and consultation), solutions to problems may be identified
770:
Further criticism of the rational model include: leaving a gap between planning and implementation, ignoring of the role of people, entrepreneurs, leadership, etc., the insufficiency of technical competence (i.e. ignoring the human factor), reflecting too mechanical an approach (i.e. the organic
977:
To obtain compliance of the actors involved, the government can resort to positive sanctions, such as favorable publicity, price supports, tax credits, grants-in-aid, direct services or benefits; declarations; rewards; voluntary standards; mediation; education; demonstration programs; training,
1063:
Characteristics of REAM include setting clear and targeted objectives at the start of a policy cycle, participation and interdisciplinary teamwork, simultaneous collection and analysis of data, and the staged reporting of findings. These require front-loaded effort: consulting with funders and
757:
Relating consequences to values — With all policies there will be a set of relevant dimensional values (for example, economic feasibility and environmental protection) and a set of criteria for appropriateness, against which performance (or consequences) of each option being responsive can be
966:
situations. There must be an authority or leader charged with the implementation and monitoring of the policy with a sound social theory underlying the program and the target group. Evaluations can help estimate what effects will be produced by program objectives/alternatives. However,
53:, and others to examine and evaluate the available options to implement the goals of laws and elected officials. People who regularly use policy analysis skills and techniques on the job, particularly those who use it as a major part of their job duties are generally known by the title 1071:. For instance, they are often used in international development to assess the impact of aid policies in response to natural disasters. It has been suggested that rapid assessment methods may be necessary to evaluate energy and climate policies in the context of the climate emergency. 771:
nature of organizations), requiring of multidimensional and complex models, generation of predictions which are often wrong (i.e. simple solutions may be overlooked), and incurring of cost (i.e. costs of rational-comprehensive planning may outweigh the cost savings of the policy).
740:
makes a series of assumptions, such as: "The model must be applied in a system that is stable"; "The government is a rational and unitary actor and that its actions are perceived as rational choices"; "The policy problem is unambiguous"; "There are no limitations of time or cost".
938:
research methodologies focused on a common theme the richness of understanding is gained. This integrates what are usually separate bodies of evaluation on the role of gender in welfare state developments, employment transformations, workplace policies, and work experience.
330:
There are six dimensions to policy analysis categorized as the effects and implementation of the policy across a period of time. Also collectively known as "Durability" of the policy, which means the capacity in content of the policy to produce visible
753:
Assessing the consequences of all options — Listing possible consequences and alternatives that could resolve the problem and ranking the probability that each potential factor could materialize in order to give a correct priority to said factor in the
986:
Policy evaluation is used to examine content, implementation or impact of the policy, which helps to understand the merit, worth and the utility of the policy. Following are National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy's (NCCHPP) 10 steps:
266:
building. A common practice is to define the problem and evaluation criteria; identify and evaluate alternatives; and recommend a certain policy accordingly. Promotion of the best agendas are the product of careful "back-room" analysis of policies by
761:
Choosing the preferred option — The policy is brought through from fully understanding the problems, opportunities, all the consequences & the criteria of the tentative options and by selecting an optimal alternative with consensus of involved
1249:
Hambrick, Ralph Jr.; Bardach, Eugene; Chelimsky, Eleanor; Shadish, William R.; Deleon, Peter; Fischer, Frank; MacRae, Duncan; Whittington, Dale (November–December 1998). "Review: Building the Policy Studies Enterprise: A Work in Progress".
1064:
achieving buy-in from informants who will face competing demands during implementation phases. They also blur the distinction between evaluation and implementation, as interim findings are used to adapt and improve processes.
608:
issue (which, in their view, could be best solved if police presence in the park is stepped up and if the individuals using illegal drugs are arrested and punished); on the other hand, other stakeholders may view this as a
190:; its scope is the broader meso-scale and it interprets problems using a political lens (i.e., the interests and goals of elected officials). It aims at determining what processes, means and policy instruments (e.g., 1051:
revision of the above replaces the first three steps with "describe the program", "identify and engage partners", and "determine timelines and available resources", while otherwise retaining the model.
1079:
Policy analysis affects policymakers' decisions by introducing them to new ideas to consider, through the work of policy analysts summarizing ideas and frameworks found in the relevant literature.
417:
compromised, it will put the implementation at risk, which will entail additional costs. Finally, implementation dimensions collectively influence a policy's ability to produce results or impacts.
158:
researchers, who are often seeking to understand why a particular policy was developed at a particular time and assess the effects, intended or otherwise, of that policy when it was implemented.
150:
policy refers to research conducted for actual policy development, often commissioned by policymakers inside the bureaucracy (e.g. civil servants) within which the policy is developed. Analysis
89:
Policy Analysis is the process of identifying potential policy options that could address your problem and then comparing those options to choose the most effective, efficient, and feasible one.
1082:
Policymakers tend to value policy analysis more depending on the cause of a policy problem. Evidence of a purposeful cause for a problem can compel policy decisions more than unguided causes.
502:. Analysts use these models to identify important aspects of policy, as well as explain and predict policy and its consequences. Each of these models are based upon the types of policies. 1714:
Morestin, F.; Castonguay, J. (2013). "Constructing a logic model for a healthy public policy: Why and how?" (Document). Montréal: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy.
592:
Identification of a problem (also called "problem definition") and demand for government action. Different stakeholders may define the same issue as different problems. For example, if
1627: 230:
influence it. As problems may result because of structural factors (e.g., a certain economic system or political institution), solutions may entail changing the structure itself.
530:
to policy measures. In general, the government applies policy to all citizens and monopolizes the use of force in applying or implementing policy (through government control of
2044: 767:
and environmental values can be difficult to quantify and forge consensus around. Furthermore, the assumptions stated by Simon are never fully valid in a real-world context.
1552:
Morgan, M. G.; Kandlikar, M.; Risbey, J.; Dowlatabadi, H. (19 March 1999). "Why Conventional Tools for Policy Analysis Are Often Inadequate for Problems of Global Change".
1466: 1679: 743:
In the context of the public sector, policy models are intended to achieve maximum social gain, and may involved the following steps to achieve rational decisions:
59:. The process is also used in the administration of large organizations with complex policies. It has been defined as the process of "determining which of various 489:
Alternative policies: surveying existing and possible policy models that could have addressed the problem better or parts of it which could make it effective.
93:
The areas of interest and the purpose of analysis determine what types of analysis are conducted. A combination of two kinds of policy analyses together with
1227: 1725: 677:
putting the selected policy option into practice. Depending on the choice made by the executive or legislative branch, this could involve creating new
562:
bodies which, while funded by government, are independent from elected officials and political leaders. These organizations may include government
2380: 2091: 1631: 312: 146:
and educational policy studies. It is linked to two different traditions of policy analysis and research frameworks. The approach of analysis
1600: 1536: 1440: 974:
in which the policy change is applied to one group and not applied to a control group and individuals are randomly assigned to these groups.
558:
branches of government are examples of institutions that give policy legitimacy. Many countries also have independent, quasi-independent or
967: 747:
Intelligence gathering — A comprehensive organization of data; potential problems and opportunities are identified, collected and analyzed.
1616: 666:
Policy selection/adoption and legal enactment of a selected policy by elected officials and/or houses of representatives. At this stage,
120: 1892: 2059: 2033: 2010: 1982: 1963: 1511: 1409: 1298: 1203: 1157: 924: 842: 978:
contracts; subsidies; loans; general expenditures; informal procedures, bargaining; franchises; sole-source provider awards...etc.
81:
new policy, which is prescriptive – it is involved with formulating policies and proposals (for example: to improve social welfare)
1106: 898: 816: 1478: 1060:
There is sometimes a need for policy assessment to be conducted at speed, using rapid evaluation and assessment methods (REAM).
2421: 161:
There are three approaches that can be distinguished: the analysis-centric, the policy process, and the meta-policy approach.
2431: 1474: 1116: 902: 820: 1683: 1352:
Hult, F. M. (2015). "Making policy connections across scales using nexus analysis". In Hult, F. M.; Johnson, D. C. (eds.).
1665: 660: 112: 438:
How much work does or will it entail? Are there significant costs associated with this solution, and are they worth it?
2401: 2084: 1290: 971: 1876:<226::aid-pam2>3.0.co;2-j "The paradox of policy analysis: If it is not used, why do we produce so much of it?" 1793:
Brusset, Emery; Cosgrave, John; MacDonald, Wayne (Summer 2010). "Real-time evaluation in humanitarian emergencies".
2426: 2119: 1919: 290: 2416: 2297: 1121: 563: 1758:
McNall, Miles; Foster-Fishman, Penny G. (June 2007). "Methods of Rapid Evaluation, Assessment, and Appraisal".
887: 805: 295: 1914:
Stone, Deborah A. (2009). "Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas". In Valelly, Richard M. (ed.).
1142:
Geva-May, Iris; Pal, Leslie A. (1999). "Policy Evaluation and Policy Analysis: Exploring the Differences". In
1219: 2222: 1502: 1195: 906: 891: 824: 809: 734: 448: 74:
existing policy, which is analytical and descriptive – it attempts to explain policies and their development
486:
Policy implications: distribution of resources, changes in services rights and statuses, tangible benefits.
202:) are used. As well, it tries to explain the role and influence of stakeholders within the policy process. 2350: 2077: 2055: 551: 527: 108: 50: 1829: 425:
One model of policy analysis is the "five-E approach", which consists of examining a policy in terms of:
2340: 2335: 2251: 2215: 1736: 1314: 1111: 1048: 38: 708:
assesses the policy, to see if the goals were achieved, if the policy was implemented effectively, etc.
2411: 2355: 2230: 1332:"PROCSEE – Strengthening Professional Higher Education and VET in Central & South Eastern Europe" 1101: 946:
There are several other major types of policy analysis, broadly groupable into competing approaches:
457:
How good is it compared to other approaches? Have all the relevant other approaches been considered?
318: 255: 243: 187: 1315:
A Critical Policy Analysis of Internationalization in Postsecondary Education: An Ontario Case Study
647:
Formulation of policy proposals by various parties (e.g., citizen groups, congressional committees,
2114: 2045:"Writing Effective Public Policy Papers: A Guide for Policy Advisers in Central and Eastern Europe" 1091: 638: 618: 301: 239: 2271: 2258: 2140: 1855: 1810: 1775: 1569: 1267: 1096: 358: 278: 270: 218: 94: 63:
will achieve a given set of goals in light of the relations between the policies and the goals."
1828:
Hampton, Sam; Fawcett, Tina; Rosenow, Jan; Michaelis, Charles; Mayne, Ruth (17 February 2021).
2311: 2196: 2175: 2168: 2029: 2006: 1978: 1959: 1896: 1830:"Evaluation in an Emergency: Assessing Transformative Energy Policy Amidst the Climate Crisis" 1635: 1596: 1532: 1507: 1436: 1432: 1405: 1399: 1357: 1294: 1199: 1153: 42: 1426: 2345: 2276: 2204: 2022: 1947:
A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem Solving'
1923: 1888: 1847: 1802: 1767: 1561: 1425:
Jimenez, Jillian; Mayers Pasztor, Eileen; Chambers, Ruth M.; Pearlman Fujii, Cheryl (2014).
1259: 722: 263: 116: 2406: 2286: 2281: 2182: 2148: 2129: 2124: 1834: 705: 626: 605: 531: 463:
What can actually be implemented? Is it better to amend, replace, remove, or add a policy?
251: 154:
policy is more of an academic exercise, conducted by academic researchers, professors and
123: 1875: 559: 514:
Policies adopted within public institutions (e.g. hospitals, child care centers, schools)
2375: 2365: 2291: 2266: 2240: 2161: 855:
An incremental policy model relies on features of incremental decision-making such as:
784: 652: 634: 622: 186:
The policy process approach puts its focal point onto political processes and involved
143: 99: 17: 2395: 2319: 2245: 2209: 2154: 2100: 1859: 1814: 1661: 1592: 1188: 701: 690: 674: 614: 499: 104: 46: 1668:
Behavioral Insights Team – via London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
1573: 526:
Public policy is determined by a range of political institutions, which give policy
2304: 1779: 1428:
Social Policy and Social Change: Toward the Creation of Social and Economic Justice
1143: 1068: 685:), creating new laws, creating a new government program or service, creating a new 682: 597: 593: 588:
Policy creation is a process that typically follows a sequence of steps or stages:
543: 539: 247: 1147: 2235: 2134: 1851: 1662:"Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomized Controlled Trials" 1401:
Introduction to Social Work & Social Welfare: Critical Thinking Perspectives
876: 856: 794: 656: 547: 195: 170:
technical and economic terms (e.g. the most efficient allocation of resources).
2370: 2189: 1843: 1565: 721:
One of the most widely used model for public institutions is one developed by
697: 678: 648: 571: 517:
Workplace (e.g. policies that govern employees and employee-manager relations)
191: 155: 1900: 1771: 1994:
Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis
863:
and a bias towards conservatism (i.e. bias against far-reaching solutions).
307: 208: 207:
that have more "buy in" from a wider group. One way of doing this follows a
1927: 1047:
Details of such a plan may vary by institution and context. For example, a
633:
with the drug-using individuals, and encourage them to voluntarily enter "
630: 567: 555: 1893:
10.1002/(sici)1520-6688(199921)18:2<226::aid-pam2>3.0.co;2-j
178: 686: 610: 199: 1271: 250:
and interviews with community members. Quantitative research includes
601: 583: 441: 213: 60: 1190:
Environmental Policy in New Zealand: The Politics of Clean and Green
371:
What are the effects of this policy on different population groups?
1806: 1354:
Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide
1263: 498:
Many models exist to analyze the development and implementation of
410:
Do the relevant policy stakeholders view the policy as acceptable?
1529:
Environmental Policy: Australian Practice in the Context of Theory
700:. After the policy has been in place for a year or several years, 535: 1956:
Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Politics
1226:. Washington, DC: Office of Policy, Performance, and Evaluation, 432:
How well does it work (or how well will it be predicted to work)?
2069: 2073: 2054:. Budapest: Local Government Public Service Reform Initiative, 870: 788: 1954:
Fischer, Frank; Miller, Gerald J.; Sidney, Mara S. (2006).
1680:"Using Randomized Control Trials to Evaluate Public Policy" 347:
What effects does the policy have on the targeted problem?
1726:"At a Glance: Goals-based Evaluation for Health Promotion" 1404:. Empowerment Series. Cengage Learning. pp. 234–236. 134:
Various approaches to policy analysis exist. The analysis
1617:"Social and Behavioral Sciences Team 2016 Annual Report" 750:
Identifying problems — Accounting for relevant factors.
604:
in a city park, some stakeholders may define this as a
480:
Assessing policy objectives and its target populations.
182:
Example of a policy cycle, used in the PROCSEE Approach
1704:
Michelle A. Saint-Germain, California State University
1628:
Executive Office of the President of the United States
1331: 66:
Policy analysis can be divided into two major fields:
617:
issue (which, in their view, could be best solved if
2003:
Policy Analysis for Practice: Applying Social Policy
460:
Establishment of recommendations for positive change
2328: 2107: 1465:Young, John; Mendizabal, Enrique (September 2009). 473:problem. Following are steps in a policy analysis: 2021: 1874: 1187: 670:is conferred upon the selected policy solution(s). 1467:"Helping researchers become policy entrepreneurs" 1287:Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age 1067:Rapid methods can be used when there is a short 511:Government (e.g. federal, provincial, municipal) 103:. Policy analysis is frequently deployed in the 1975:Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, 4th ed 107:, but is equally applicable elsewhere, such as 87: 447:Is it ethically and morally sound? Are there 2085: 2005:. Policy Press at the University of Bristol. 286:Several methods used in policy analysis are: 8: 477:Defining the problem assessed by the policy. 905:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 823:. Unsourced material may be challenged and 390:What is the financial cost of this policy? 276: 268: 2092: 2078: 2070: 1506:(3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press. 1228:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 950:Empirical versus normative policy analyses 1881:Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1398:Kirst-Ashman, Karen K. (1 January 2016). 1181: 1179: 956:Prescriptive versus descriptive analyses. 953:Retrospective versus prospective analyses 925:Learn how and when to remove this message 843:Learn how and when to remove this message 1186:BĂĽhrs, Ton; Bartlett, Robert V. (1993). 982:Steps for conducting a policy evaluation 629:counsellors were sent to the park to do 381: 338: 221:, value for money, outcomes or outputs. 177: 1916:Princeton Readings in American Politics 1682:. Australian Government. Archived from 1632:National Science and Technology Council 1630:/ Social and Behavioral Sciences Team, 1133: 1056:Rapid evaluation and assessment methods 313:Program evaluation and review technique 27:Technique used in public administration 1455:Kim Bergeron, Florence Morestin et al. 1152:. Nova Science Publishers. p. 6. 673:Policy implementation, which involves 2024:Policy Analysis Concepts and Practice 1040:Interpret and disseminate the results 7: 903:adding citations to reliable sources 821:adding citations to reliable sources 400:Is the policy technically feasible? 115:. Policy analysis has its roots in 1007:Determine your evaluation questions 142:policy) is the central approach in 121:United States Secretary of Defense 25: 2043:Young, EĂłin; Quinn, Lisa (2002). 1319:The University of Western Ontario 1004:Assess resources and evaluability 326:Dimensions for analyzing policies 1107:Eightfold path (policy analysis) 1028:Process data and analyze results 1010:Determine methods and procedures 875: 793: 246:. Qualitative research includes 775:for rational decision-making". 483:Studying effects of the policy. 1760:American Journal of Evaluation 1475:Overseas Development Institute 1117:Political feasibility analysis 661:non-governmental organizations 113:non-governmental organizations 1: 1795:New Directions for Evaluation 1666:United Kingdom Cabinet Office 1208:– via Internet Archive. 683:removing existing regulations 1531:. Sydney: Federation Press. 1252:Public Administration Review 85:One definition states that: 1958:. New York: Marcel Dekker. 1852:10.1016/j.joule.2020.12.019 1589:Understanding Public Policy 1291:Georgetown University Press 1102:Discursive institutionalism 574:and electoral commissions. 454:Evaluations of alternatives 37:is a technique used in the 2448: 1996:. Edward Elgar Publishing. 1920:Princeton University Press 1220:"POLARIS: Policy Analysis" 782: 732: 581: 238:Policy analysis uses both 1973:Dunn, William N. (2007). 1527:Thomas, Ian, ed. (2007). 1356:. Malden, Massachusetts: 1122:Propensity score matching 1043:Apply evaluation findings 972:randomized control trials 306:Decision-making based on 2381:Public policy by country 1945:Bardach, Eugene (2011). 1772:10.1177/1098214007300895 296:Management by objectives 1992:Parsons, D. W. (1995). 1873:Shulock, Nancy (1999). 1587:Dye, Thomas R. (2007). 1566:10.1023/A:1005469411776 1503:Administrative Behavior 1500:Herbert, Simon (1976). 1313:Khorsandi Taskoh, Ali. 1196:Oxford University Press 1149:Policy Analysis Methods 1013:Develop evaluation plan 735:Rational planning model 729:Rational planning model 717:For public institutions 449:unintended consequences 109:nonprofit organizations 51:nonprofit organizations 2422:Public policy research 2351:Public policy doctrine 2056:Open Society Institute 2020:Weimer, David (2004). 2001:Spicker, Paul (2006). 1928:10.2307/j.ctv1mjqv11.6 1733:PublicHealthOntario.ca 1660:Haynes, Laura (2012). 1634:. 2016. Archived from 1370:Rychetnik et al., 2002 970:can only be made with 277: 269: 183: 119:, an approach used by 91: 35:public policy analysis 18:Public policy analysis 2432:Public administration 2341:Public administration 2336:Evidence-based policy 1737:Public Health Ontario 1285:Radin, Beryl (2000). 1112:New public management 1075:Value to policymakers 1049:Public Health Ontario 783:Further information: 494:Evidence-based models 291:Cost–benefit analysis 181: 138:policy (and analysis 39:public administration 2356:Public policy school 2065:on 19 November 2012. 1481:on 26 September 2012 899:improve this section 817:improve this section 619:public health nurses 319:Critical path method 256:statistical analysis 244:quantitative methods 1949:. CQ Press College. 1379:Potvin et al., 2008 1360:. pp. 217–231. 1321:, October 24, 2014. 1092:Advocacy evaluation 1001:Engage stakeholders 968:claims of causality 668:policy legitimation 572:regulatory agencies 302:Operations research 240:qualitative methods 2402:Evaluation methods 1922:. pp. 34–50. 1435:. pp. 25–28. 1097:Discourse analysis 998:Clarify the policy 779:Incremental policy 704:or an independent 359:unintended effects 353:Unintended effects 219:cost-effectiveness 184: 95:program evaluation 2427:Political science 2389: 2388: 2314: 2307: 2300: 2261: 2254: 2225: 2218: 2199: 2192: 2185: 2178: 2171: 2164: 2157: 2143: 2028:. Prentice Hall. 1602:978-0-13-936948-3 1591:(12th ed.). 1538:978-1-86287-603-3 1442:978-1-4833-2415-9 1433:Sage Publications 935: 934: 927: 853: 852: 845: 414: 413: 375: 374: 211:model called the 43:political science 16:(Redirected from 2439: 2417:Systems analysis 2346:Public budgeting 2310: 2303: 2296: 2257: 2250: 2223:Renewable energy 2221: 2214: 2195: 2188: 2181: 2174: 2167: 2160: 2153: 2139: 2094: 2087: 2080: 2071: 2066: 2064: 2058:. Archived from 2049: 2039: 2027: 2016: 1997: 1988: 1969: 1950: 1932: 1931: 1911: 1905: 1904: 1878: 1870: 1864: 1863: 1825: 1819: 1818: 1790: 1784: 1783: 1755: 1749: 1748: 1746: 1744: 1739:. September 2023 1730: 1722: 1716: 1715: 1711: 1705: 1702: 1696: 1695: 1693: 1691: 1676: 1670: 1669: 1657: 1651: 1650: 1648: 1646: 1641:on 10 March 2017 1640: 1621: 1613: 1607: 1606: 1584: 1578: 1577: 1560:(3–4): 271–281. 1549: 1543: 1542: 1524: 1518: 1517: 1497: 1491: 1490: 1488: 1486: 1477:. Archived from 1462: 1456: 1453: 1447: 1446: 1422: 1416: 1415: 1395: 1389: 1386: 1380: 1377: 1371: 1368: 1362: 1361: 1349: 1343: 1342: 1340: 1338: 1328: 1322: 1311: 1305: 1304: 1282: 1276: 1275: 1246: 1240: 1239: 1237: 1235: 1216: 1210: 1209: 1193: 1183: 1174: 1173: 1168: 1166: 1144:Nagel, Stuart S. 1138: 930: 923: 919: 916: 910: 879: 871: 848: 841: 837: 834: 828: 797: 789: 723:Herbert A. Simon 382: 361:of this policy? 339: 282: 275:assessment and ' 274: 165:Analysis-centric 117:systems analysis 21: 2447: 2446: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2385: 2361:Policy analysis 2324: 2103: 2098: 2062: 2047: 2042: 2036: 2019: 2013: 2000: 1991: 1985: 1972: 1966: 1953: 1944: 1941: 1939:Further reading 1936: 1935: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1872: 1871: 1867: 1827: 1826: 1822: 1792: 1791: 1787: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1742: 1740: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1719: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1703: 1699: 1689: 1687: 1686:on 25 July 2019 1678: 1677: 1673: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1644: 1642: 1638: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1603: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1554:Climatic Change 1551: 1550: 1546: 1539: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1514: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1484: 1482: 1464: 1463: 1459: 1454: 1450: 1443: 1424: 1423: 1419: 1412: 1397: 1396: 1392: 1387: 1383: 1378: 1374: 1369: 1365: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1336: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1312: 1308: 1301: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1248: 1247: 1243: 1233: 1231: 1230:. 26 April 2023 1218: 1217: 1213: 1206: 1185: 1184: 1177: 1164: 1162: 1160: 1141: 1139: 1135: 1130: 1088: 1077: 1058: 984: 963: 944: 931: 920: 914: 911: 896: 880: 869: 849: 838: 832: 829: 814: 798: 787: 781: 737: 731: 719: 706:consulting firm 653:interest groups 627:substance abuse 623:medical doctors 621:and government 606:law enforcement 594:homeless people 586: 580: 532:law enforcement 524: 508: 496: 470: 423: 421:Five-E approach 328: 252:survey research 236: 227: 176: 167: 132: 124:Robert McNamara 31:Policy analysis 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2445: 2443: 2435: 2434: 2429: 2424: 2419: 2414: 2409: 2404: 2394: 2393: 2387: 2386: 2384: 2383: 2378: 2376:Youth services 2373: 2368: 2366:Policy studies 2363: 2358: 2353: 2348: 2343: 2338: 2332: 2330: 2326: 2325: 2323: 2322: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2308: 2301: 2289: 2284: 2279: 2274: 2269: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2255: 2252:Pharmaceutical 2243: 2238: 2233: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2219: 2216:Nuclear energy 2207: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2193: 2186: 2179: 2172: 2165: 2158: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2132: 2127: 2122: 2120:Climate change 2117: 2111: 2109: 2105: 2104: 2099: 2097: 2096: 2089: 2082: 2074: 2068: 2067: 2040: 2034: 2017: 2011: 1998: 1989: 1983: 1970: 1964: 1951: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1933: 1906: 1887:(2): 226–244. 1865: 1820: 1807:10.1002/ev.326 1785: 1766:(2): 151–168. 1750: 1717: 1706: 1697: 1671: 1652: 1608: 1601: 1579: 1544: 1537: 1519: 1512: 1492: 1457: 1448: 1441: 1417: 1410: 1390: 1381: 1372: 1363: 1344: 1323: 1306: 1299: 1277: 1264:10.2307/977580 1258:(6): 533–539. 1241: 1211: 1204: 1175: 1158: 1132: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1119: 1114: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1087: 1084: 1076: 1073: 1057: 1054: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1036: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1022: 1021: 1019: 1018:Implementation 1015: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1002: 999: 995: 994: 992: 983: 980: 962: 959: 958: 957: 954: 951: 943: 940: 933: 932: 883: 881: 874: 868: 867:For workplaces 865: 851: 850: 801: 799: 792: 785:Incrementalism 780: 777: 764: 763: 759: 755: 751: 748: 733:Main article: 730: 727: 718: 715: 713:this entails. 710: 709: 702:civil servants 694: 675:civil servants 671: 664: 645: 644:Agenda setting 642: 639:rehabilitation 635:detoxification 579: 576: 523: 520: 519: 518: 515: 512: 507: 504: 495: 492: 491: 490: 487: 484: 481: 478: 469: 466: 465: 464: 461: 458: 455: 452: 445: 444:considerations 439: 436: 433: 430: 422: 419: 412: 411: 408: 402: 401: 398: 392: 391: 388: 378:Implementation 373: 372: 369: 363: 362: 355: 349: 348: 345: 327: 324: 323: 322: 316: 310: 304: 299: 293: 235: 232: 226: 223: 175: 174:Policy process 172: 166: 163: 144:social science 131: 128: 126:in the 1960s. 100:policy studies 97:is defined as 83: 82: 80: 75: 73: 56:policy analyst 47:civil servants 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2444: 2433: 2430: 2428: 2425: 2423: 2420: 2418: 2415: 2413: 2410: 2408: 2405: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2397: 2382: 2379: 2377: 2374: 2372: 2369: 2367: 2364: 2362: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2352: 2349: 2347: 2344: 2342: 2339: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2331: 2327: 2321: 2318: 2313: 2309: 2306: 2302: 2299: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2290: 2288: 2285: 2283: 2280: 2278: 2275: 2273: 2270: 2268: 2265: 2260: 2256: 2253: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2244: 2242: 2239: 2237: 2234: 2232: 2231:Environmental 2229: 2224: 2220: 2217: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2208: 2206: 2203: 2198: 2194: 2191: 2187: 2184: 2180: 2177: 2173: 2170: 2166: 2163: 2159: 2156: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2147: 2142: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2133: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2123: 2121: 2118: 2116: 2113: 2112: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2101:Public policy 2095: 2090: 2088: 2083: 2081: 2076: 2075: 2072: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2046: 2041: 2037: 2035:9780131830011 2031: 2026: 2025: 2018: 2014: 2012:9781861348258 2008: 2004: 1999: 1995: 1990: 1986: 1984:9780136155546 1980: 1976: 1971: 1967: 1965:1-57444-561-8 1961: 1957: 1952: 1948: 1943: 1942: 1938: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1910: 1907: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1877: 1869: 1866: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1831: 1824: 1821: 1816: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1801:(126): 9–20. 1800: 1796: 1789: 1786: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1754: 1751: 1738: 1734: 1727: 1721: 1718: 1710: 1707: 1701: 1698: 1685: 1681: 1675: 1672: 1667: 1663: 1656: 1653: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1618: 1612: 1609: 1604: 1598: 1594: 1593:Prentice Hall 1590: 1583: 1580: 1575: 1571: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1548: 1545: 1540: 1534: 1530: 1523: 1520: 1515: 1513:0-684-83582-7 1509: 1505: 1504: 1496: 1493: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1461: 1458: 1452: 1449: 1444: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1429: 1421: 1418: 1413: 1411:9781305856080 1407: 1403: 1402: 1394: 1391: 1385: 1382: 1376: 1373: 1367: 1364: 1359: 1355: 1348: 1345: 1333: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1310: 1307: 1302: 1300:0-87840-773-1 1296: 1292: 1288: 1281: 1278: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1245: 1242: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1215: 1212: 1207: 1205:0-19-558284-5 1201: 1197: 1192: 1191: 1182: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1161: 1159:9781560726579 1155: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1137: 1134: 1127: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1115: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1083: 1080: 1074: 1072: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1042: 1039: 1038: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1027: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1016: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1003: 1000: 997: 996: 993: 990: 989: 988: 981: 979: 975: 973: 969: 960: 955: 952: 949: 948: 947: 941: 939: 929: 926: 918: 915:December 2023 908: 904: 900: 894: 893: 889: 884:This section 882: 878: 873: 872: 866: 864: 860: 858: 847: 844: 836: 833:December 2023 826: 822: 818: 812: 811: 807: 802:This section 800: 796: 791: 790: 786: 778: 776: 772: 768: 760: 756: 752: 749: 746: 745: 744: 741: 736: 728: 726: 724: 716: 714: 707: 703: 699: 695: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 669: 665: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 643: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 616: 615:public health 612: 607: 603: 599: 598:illegal drugs 595: 591: 590: 589: 585: 578:Process model 577: 575: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 521: 516: 513: 510: 509: 505: 503: 501: 500:public policy 493: 488: 485: 482: 479: 476: 475: 474: 467: 462: 459: 456: 453: 450: 446: 443: 440: 437: 434: 431: 429:Effectiveness 428: 427: 426: 420: 418: 409: 407: 406:Acceptability 404: 403: 399: 397: 394: 393: 389: 387: 384: 383: 380: 379: 370: 368: 365: 364: 360: 357:What are the 356: 354: 351: 350: 346: 344: 343:Effectiveness 341: 340: 337: 336: 332: 325: 320: 317: 314: 311: 309: 305: 303: 300: 297: 294: 292: 289: 288: 287: 284: 281: 280: 273: 272: 265: 261: 260:data analysis 258:(also called 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 233: 231: 224: 222: 220: 216: 215: 210: 205: 201: 197: 193: 189: 180: 173: 171: 164: 162: 159: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 129: 127: 125: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 105:public sector 102: 101: 96: 90: 86: 78: 76: 71: 69: 68: 67: 64: 62: 58: 57: 52: 48: 44: 41:sub-field of 40: 36: 32: 19: 2360: 2329:Other topics 2115:Agricultural 2060:the original 2051: 2023: 2002: 1993: 1974: 1955: 1946: 1915: 1909: 1884: 1880: 1868: 1839: 1833: 1823: 1798: 1794: 1788: 1763: 1759: 1753: 1741:. Retrieved 1732: 1720: 1709: 1700: 1688:. Retrieved 1684:the original 1674: 1655: 1643:. Retrieved 1636:the original 1623: 1611: 1588: 1582: 1557: 1553: 1547: 1528: 1522: 1501: 1495: 1483:. Retrieved 1479:the original 1470: 1460: 1451: 1427: 1420: 1400: 1393: 1388:Peters, 2002 1384: 1375: 1366: 1353: 1347: 1335:. Retrieved 1326: 1318: 1309: 1286: 1280: 1255: 1251: 1244: 1232:. Retrieved 1223: 1214: 1189: 1170: 1163:. Retrieved 1148: 1136: 1081: 1078: 1069:policy cycle 1066: 1062: 1059: 1046: 1025:Collect data 985: 976: 964: 945: 936: 921: 912: 897:Please help 885: 861: 854: 839: 830: 815:Please help 803: 773: 769: 765: 742: 738: 720: 711: 667: 657:lobby groups 587: 584:Policy cycle 560:arm's length 544:armed forces 540:imprisonment 525: 497: 471: 424: 415: 405: 395: 385: 377: 376: 366: 352: 342: 334: 333: 329: 285: 283:evaluation. 279:a posteriori 259: 248:case studies 237: 228: 214:policy cycle 212: 204:Stakeholders 203: 188:stakeholders 185: 168: 160: 151: 147: 139: 135: 133: 98: 92: 88: 84: 65: 55: 54: 34: 30: 29: 2412:Social work 2272:Immigration 2259:Vaccination 1977:. Pearson. 1846:: 285–289. 1743:16 December 1690:27 February 1645:27 February 1234:7 September 1033:Utilization 857:satisficing 649:think tanks 564:commissions 548:legislature 522:Governments 396:Feasibility 234:Methodology 225:Meta-policy 196:legislation 2396:Categories 2371:Regulation 2312:Technology 2176:Investment 2169:Industrial 2052:LGI.OSI.hu 1844:Cell Press 1473:. London: 1471:ODI.org.uk 1128:References 961:Evaluation 698:evaluation 679:regulation 641:programs). 596:are using 582:See also: 528:legitimacy 435:Efficiency 192:regulation 156:think tank 130:Approaches 45:to enable 2298:Stem cell 2277:Knowledge 2205:Education 1901:0276-8739 1860:233951003 1815:144295552 1485:7 October 1140:Compare: 886:does not 804:does not 754:analysis. 568:tribunals 552:executive 538:systems, 468:Framework 308:analytics 209:heuristic 77:Analysis 70:Analysis 2287:Military 2282:Language 2183:Monetary 2149:Economic 2130:Domestic 2125:Cultural 1624:SBST.gov 1574:53603959 1337:19 April 1165:13 April 1086:See also 991:Planning 631:outreach 600:such as 556:judicial 271:a priori 61:policies 2292:Science 2267:Housing 2241:Foreign 2162:Incomes 1780:2699534 1224:CDC.gov 1146:(ed.). 907:removed 892:sources 825:removed 810:sources 762:actors. 758:judged. 696:Policy 687:subsidy 611:poverty 546:). The 442:Ethical 335:Effects 200:subsidy 2407:Policy 2320:Social 2246:Health 2210:Energy 2155:Fiscal 2141:reform 2108:Fields 2032:  2009:  1981:  1962:  1899:  1858:  1813:  1778:  1599:  1572:  1535:  1510:  1439:  1408:  1297:  1272:977580 1270:  1202:  1156:  693:, etc. 602:heroin 367:Equity 321:(CPM). 315:(PERT) 262:) and 2305:Space 2197:Trade 2063:(PDF) 2048:(PDF) 1856:S2CID 1842:(2). 1835:Joule 1811:S2CID 1776:S2CID 1729:(PDF) 1639:(PDF) 1620:(PDF) 1570:S2CID 1358:Wiley 1268:JSTOR 942:Other 691:grant 637:" or 536:court 506:Types 298:(MBO) 264:model 2236:Food 2135:Drug 2030:ISBN 2007:ISBN 1979:ISBN 1960:ISBN 1897:ISSN 1799:2010 1745:2023 1692:2017 1647:2017 1597:ISBN 1533:ISBN 1508:ISBN 1487:2009 1437:ISBN 1406:ISBN 1339:2019 1295:ISBN 1236:2023 1200:ISBN 1167:2016 1154:ISBN 890:any 888:cite 808:any 806:cite 681:(or 625:and 613:and 554:and 542:and 386:Cost 242:and 111:and 2190:Tax 1924:doi 1889:doi 1848:doi 1803:doi 1768:doi 1562:doi 1260:doi 901:by 819:by 689:or 148:for 136:for 79:for 33:or 2398:: 2050:. 1918:. 1895:. 1885:18 1883:. 1879:. 1854:. 1838:. 1832:. 1809:. 1797:. 1774:. 1764:28 1762:. 1735:. 1731:. 1664:. 1626:. 1622:. 1595:. 1568:. 1558:41 1556:. 1469:. 1431:. 1317:, 1293:. 1289:. 1266:. 1256:58 1254:. 1222:. 1198:. 1194:. 1178:^ 1169:. 663:). 659:, 655:, 651:, 570:, 566:, 550:, 534:, 254:, 198:, 194:, 152:of 140:of 72:of 49:, 2093:e 2086:t 2079:v 2038:. 2015:. 1987:. 1968:. 1930:. 1926:: 1903:. 1891:: 1862:. 1850:: 1840:5 1817:. 1805:: 1782:. 1770:: 1747:. 1694:. 1649:. 1605:. 1576:. 1564:: 1541:. 1516:. 1489:. 1445:. 1414:. 1341:. 1303:. 1274:. 1262:: 1238:. 928:) 922:( 917:) 913:( 909:. 895:. 846:) 840:( 835:) 831:( 827:. 813:. 451:? 20:)

Index

Public policy analysis
public administration
political science
civil servants
nonprofit organizations
policies
program evaluation
policy studies
public sector
nonprofit organizations
non-governmental organizations
systems analysis
United States Secretary of Defense
Robert McNamara
social science
think tank

stakeholders
regulation
legislation
subsidy
heuristic
policy cycle
cost-effectiveness
qualitative methods
quantitative methods
case studies
survey research
statistical analysis
model

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑