Knowledge (XXG)

Panachage

Source 📝

913: 48: 888: 900: 1006:. In panachage, voters support individual candidates (rather than parties). Voters have multiple votes, which they can split between individual candidates in different party lists. Seats are allocated to each party based on the number of votes for all of its candidates. Seats allocated to a party go to that party's most-popular candidates (assuming a 1447:
in communes having fewer than 1,000 inhabitants (at the time: 26,879 communes, representing 73.5% of the total) have been able to cast ballot papers indicating their preference for candidates either listed or named individually, and, in addition, cross out if they so wish the names of one or more
1060:
The Central Strelsau constituency in the Ruritanian Assembly of the Republic elects six members using a fully open list. Three lists, containing twenty-two candidates in total, are vying for its seats. in this example, 40,500 votes are cast. The totals for each candidate and party are:
1540:
In Switzerland, in addition to being able to distribute their votes between different lists, voters may add names to lists, and/or delete one or more of the names appearing on others. Each candidate can be placed up to two times on the ballot paper. This practice is known as
1451:
Until a reform effective 17 May 2013, voters had been able to write in the names of other, unlisted eligible citizens. But now all nominations must be filed in advance with the prefecture or sub-prefecture, and voters may no longer add names on election day.
1532:, a voter in Luxembourg has as many votes as there are seats to be filled in that constituency. The individual may vote either for candidates on the same list or for candidates on different lists and may allocate up to two votes to a single candidate. 1448:
candidates. (Before that time, the upper population limit for communes qualified for this system of voting had been 3,500.) The number of candidates selected by a voter must not, however, exceed the total number of available seats.
1430:"For the first time, voters will be able to select individual candidates from any party rather than being forced to vote for a single party with an established list of candidates. Voters can still opt to simply choose a party." 1321:
The SDP seats go to its most popular three candidates by vote tally: Megan Vargas, Matt Wright, and Pranav Kapoor. The NCP seats go to its top two candidates, Bob Jones and Tricia Chapman. The LCC seat goes to Sam Miller.
1402:
parliamentary elections, voters have as many votes as there are seats to be filled. They may use their votes to support candidates across party lines (and they may also give several votes to a single candidate).
1815:[LAW No. 2013-403 of 17 May 2013 concerning the election of departmental councilors, city councilors and community councilors and amending the electoral calendar] (in French). Legifrance. 17 May 2013 1813:"LOI n° 2013-403 du 17 mai 2013 relative à l'élection des conseillers départementaux, des conseillers municipaux et des conseillers communautaires, et modifiant le calendrier électoral" 1616: 1378:
Municipal elections were held under the panachage system until passage of the 5 July 1976 Law. This change was adopted before the first elections (October 1976) following the
1627: 941: 1838: 1638: 632: 1907: 1792: 1713: 1599:. Estudios e Investigaciones NÂș7 (in Spanish). Vol. I. Directorate of Parliamentary Information of the National Congress. April 1993. p. 17. 1484:
to select candidates from lists, i.e. voters may only give one vote to a candidate they support. In all other states allowing panachage, voters may
664: 526: 521: 934: 627: 1812: 309: 1007: 833: 1423: 1419: 1379: 84: 1753: 1348: 1340: 1336: 927: 1591: 1738: 828: 1942: 1613: 1529: 1351:, Argentine voters had the possibility of crossing out or adding candidates to the electoral lists of the legislative elections. 818: 568: 539: 479: 1668: 1624: 1440: 1344: 1045: 550: 75: 1635: 1513: 613: 1444: 1368: 255: 240: 225: 871: 491: 414: 335: 1003: 303: 285: 126: 1690: 1387: 856: 1014: 747: 730: 697: 677: 461: 449: 419: 220: 178: 111: 555: 603: 596: 80: 1709: 1411: 1307: 1030: 1022: 657: 585: 574: 437: 424: 407: 384: 362: 325: 315: 1382:, which reduced the number of Belgian communes from 2,359 to 596. Bills were introduced in 1995 and 1999 by 1315: 1018: 783: 637: 320: 1497: 1481: 812: 692: 622: 429: 1517: 1034: 720: 560: 444: 250: 229: 161: 139: 1311: 912: 778: 1399: 1372: 1038: 1026: 851: 838: 806: 70: 1642: 1631: 1620: 757: 591: 244: 1477: 1049: 917: 788: 399: 183: 1476:) for state and municipal elections. Eleven others use the system only for municipal elections. 866: 1891: 1734: 1542: 1489: 1485: 1461: 1041: 999: 823: 793: 715: 652: 486: 213: 188: 171: 39: 1383: 963: 904: 861: 752: 740: 454: 330: 156: 150: 132: 121: 116: 104: 65: 27: 1741: 892: 725: 580: 545: 466: 377: 280: 203: 145: 23: 47: 1561: 1465: 762: 702: 687: 498: 367: 342: 193: 1912:
www.luxembourg.lu (The official presentation website of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg)
1714:
Proposition de loi modifiant la loi électorale communale et instaurant le vote panaché
1691:
Proposition de loi modifiant la loi électorale communale et instaurant le vote panaché
887: 1936: 1472:, both of which are city-states) have adopted electoral systems including panachage ( 771: 471: 259: 97: 60: 35: 1861: 1773: 1686: 511: 275: 268: 198: 1662: 389: 347: 290: 235: 1841:[Election Code – Article L255-4] (in French). Legifrance. 23 March 2014 1924: 1415: 352: 1776:(reproduction of ballot papers and explanation of the new voting system)", 1314:, the Social Democratic Party wins 3 seats, the NCP 2, and the LCC 1. (See 899: 1501: 608: 1788: 1469: 394: 1512:
Panachage within an open list proportional system has been used since
1793:
El Salvador joins the panachage ranks, president’s party holds steady
1493: 1371:, panachage was allowed in provincial and parliamentary elections in 1310:
between the parties in according to their vote share. When using the
1754:
Voters head to the polls in El Salvador to elect legislators, mayors
1375:. Candidates were placed on lists in alphabetical order of surname. 990: 987: 1390:
to reinstitute panachage, but they were never put to votes.
46: 1878: 978: 984: 972: 1906:
some communes use the system of relative majority, cf.
1581:
Hoag and Hallett, Proportional Representation, p. 52-53
1486:
give more than one vote for one or several candidate(s)
1528:
In all proportional elections, such as those for the
975: 966: 969: 981: 1013:The system is used in legislative elections for 1359:Panachage was used in Austria until the 1970s. 998:, from French meaning "blend, mixture") is a 935: 8: 1063: 1037:; and in local elections in a majority of 942: 928: 18: 1667:SPF IntĂ©rieur - Direction des Elections ( 1553: 34: 1663:Evolution de la lĂ©gislation Ă©lectorale 16:Variant of most open party list voting 7: 1608: 1606: 1774:Papeletas para las elecciones 2015 1422:. It introduced panachage for the 14: 1839:"Code Ă©lectoral – Article L255-4" 1649:, website of the Swiss Parliament 962: 911: 898: 886: 834:McKelvey–Schofield chaos theorem 480:Semi-proportional representation 112:First preference plurality (FPP) 1860:(in German) Martin Fehndrich, 1669:Federal Public Service Interior 1369:parliamentary elections of 1900 1052:with under 1,000 inhabitants. 872:Harsanyi's utilitarian theorem 829:Moulin's impossibility theorem 794:Conflicting majorities paradox 1: 1927:. Retrieved on 23 April 2008. 1562:"Merriam-Webster – panachage" 1516:for legislative elections in 1306:In the first step, seats are 1076:League of Concerned Citizens 698:Frustrated majorities paradox 1925:Country Profile - Luxembourg 1689:, Christiaan Vandenbroeke, " 1418:proportional system for the 1073:National Consolidation Party 867:Condorcet dominance theorems 807:Social and collective choice 1879:Interactive vote simulation 1318:for further explanation.) 1025:; in national elections in 1004:proportional representation 533:By mechanism of combination 304:Proportional representation 1959: 1778:Tribunal Supremo Electoral 1420:2012 legislative elections 1312:D'Hondt method of rounding 731:Multiple districts paradox 462:Fractional approval voting 450:Interactive representation 1075: 1072: 1069: 678:Paradoxes and pathologies 527:Mixed-member proportional 522:Mixed-member majoritarian 517:By results of combination 408:Approval-based committees 1731:Democratic Latin America 1710:Vincent Van Quickenborne 857:Condorcet's jury theorem 658:Double simultaneous vote 633:Rural–urban proportional 628:Dual-member proportional 590: 579: 546:Parallel (superposition) 438:Fractional social choice 425:Expanding approvals rule 254: 239: 224: 155: 144: 120: 1943:Mixed electoral systems 1914:, Updated 28 April 2015 1647:The Election Dictionary 1316:highest averages method 1070:Social Democratic Party 784:Tyranny of the majority 561:Fusion (majority bonus) 378:Quota-remainder methods 1504:do not use panachage. 1498:North Rhine-Westphalia 1482:block plurality voting 1432: 918:Mathematics portal 824:Majority impossibility 813:Impossibility theorems 609:Negative vote transfer 430:Method of equal shares 51: 1923:IFES Election Guide: 1428: 721:Best-is-worst paradox 710:Pathological response 445:Direct representation 98:Single-winner methods 50: 1380:1976 communes merger 905:Economics portal 852:Median voter theorem 71:Comparative politics 1752:George Rodriguez, " 1671:- Elections Office) 1643:Library of Congress 1634:Web Archives" and " 1632:Library of Congress 1621:Library of Congress 1530:Chamber of Deputies 1445:municipal elections 1108:Janek Campbell-Pitt 1066: 893:Politics portal 604:Vote linkage system 575:Seat linkage system 162:Ranked-choice (RCV) 1789:Matthew S. Shugart 1760:, 28 February 2015 1733:, Routledge, 2015 1720:, 24 November 1999 1641:2015-04-07 at the 1630:2015-04-07 at the 1619:2015-04-07 at the 1614:Splitting the vote 1478:Schleswig-Holstein 1064: 1056:Fictitious example 789:Discursive dilemma 748:Lesser evil voting 623:Supermixed systems 326:Largest remainders 184:Round-robin voting 52: 1896:Election Passport 1729:Craig Arceneaux, 1718:Senate of Belgium 1695:Senate of Belgium 1673:, 26 January 2010 1543:cumulative voting 1490:cumulative voting 1304: 1303: 1117:Sylvia Ambrosetti 1065:Election results 1000:mixed single vote 952: 951: 839:Gibbard's theorem 779:Dominance paradox 716:Perverse response 420:Phragmen's method 286:Majority judgment 214:Positional voting 172:Condorcet methods 40:electoral systems 1950: 1928: 1921: 1915: 1904: 1898: 1888: 1882: 1875: 1869: 1858: 1852: 1850: 1848: 1846: 1836: 1832: 1826: 1824: 1822: 1820: 1810: 1806: 1800: 1797:Fruits and Votes 1786: 1780: 1771: 1767: 1761: 1750: 1744: 1727: 1721: 1708: 1704: 1698: 1684: 1680: 1674: 1660: 1656: 1650: 1623:Web Archives", " 1610: 1601: 1600: 1598: 1588: 1582: 1579: 1573: 1572: 1570: 1568: 1558: 1271:Raymond Sullivan 1135:David "D-Dog" Ng 1067: 1002:variant of list 997: 996: 993: 992: 989: 986: 983: 980: 977: 974: 971: 968: 961: 944: 937: 930: 916: 915: 903: 902: 891: 890: 846:Positive results 741:Strategic voting 638:Majority jackpot 595: 584: 455:Liquid democracy 331:National remnant 321:Highest averages 258: 243: 228: 160: 151:Alternative vote 149: 133:Partisan primary 125: 66:Mechanism design 19: 1958: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1922: 1918: 1908:Local Elections 1905: 1901: 1889: 1885: 1876: 1872: 1868:, 19 March 2009 1859: 1855: 1844: 1842: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1818: 1816: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1803: 1787: 1783: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1751: 1747: 1728: 1724: 1706: 1705: 1701: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1645:Web Archives", 1636:Deleting a name 1611: 1604: 1596: 1590: 1589: 1585: 1580: 1576: 1566: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1538: 1526: 1510: 1458: 1437: 1409: 1396: 1365: 1357: 1333: 1328: 1233:Duncan Bradshaw 1058: 1050:French communes 1008:fully open list 965: 959: 958: 948: 910: 909: 897: 885: 877: 876: 843: 819:Arrow's theorem 809: 799: 798: 767: 737: 726:No-show paradox 707: 693:Cloning paradox 683:Spoiler effects 680: 670: 669: 644: 531: 514: 504: 503: 476: 467:Maximal lottery 434: 415:Thiele's method 404: 374: 306: 296: 295: 281:Approval voting 269:Cardinal voting 265: 210: 204:Maximal lottery 168: 100: 90: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1956: 1954: 1946: 1945: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1929: 1916: 1899: 1883: 1870: 1853: 1827: 1801: 1799:, 8 March 2015 1781: 1762: 1745: 1722: 1699: 1697:, 13 July 1995 1675: 1651: 1602: 1583: 1574: 1552: 1550: 1547: 1537: 1534: 1525: 1522: 1509: 1506: 1462:federal states 1457: 1454: 1436: 1433: 1424:2015 elections 1408: 1405: 1395: 1392: 1364: 1361: 1356: 1353: 1332: 1329: 1327: 1324: 1302: 1301: 1298: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1286: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1275: 1272: 1269: 1264: 1258: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1228: 1227:Gene MacDonald 1225: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1214: 1211: 1208: 1205: 1202: 1201:Thomas McLeish 1198: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1186: 1184:Tricia Chapman 1181: 1178: 1174: 1173: 1170: 1169:Pat Malkiewicz 1167: 1164: 1161: 1156: 1150: 1149: 1144: 1139: 1136: 1133: 1128: 1122: 1121: 1118: 1115: 1110: 1105: 1102: 1098: 1097: 1094: 1091: 1088: 1085: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1071: 1057: 1054: 950: 949: 947: 946: 939: 932: 924: 921: 920: 908: 907: 895: 882: 879: 878: 875: 874: 869: 864: 859: 854: 842: 841: 836: 831: 826: 821: 810: 805: 804: 801: 800: 797: 796: 791: 786: 781: 766: 765: 763:Turkey-raising 760: 755: 750: 736: 735: 734: 733: 723: 718: 706: 705: 703:Center squeeze 700: 695: 690: 688:Spoiler effect 681: 676: 675: 672: 671: 668: 667: 662: 661: 660: 647:By ballot type 643: 642: 641: 640: 635: 630: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 611: 601: 600: 599: 588: 565: 564: 563: 558: 553: 548: 530: 529: 524: 515: 510: 509: 506: 505: 502: 501: 499:Limited voting 496: 495: 494: 475: 474: 469: 464: 459: 458: 457: 452: 433: 432: 427: 422: 417: 403: 402: 397: 392: 387: 373: 372: 371: 370: 368:Localized list 365: 360: 355: 350: 340: 339: 338: 336:Biproportional 333: 328: 323: 307: 302: 301: 298: 297: 294: 293: 288: 283: 278: 264: 263: 248: 233: 209: 208: 207: 206: 201: 196: 191: 181: 167: 166: 165: 164: 153: 140:Instant-runoff 137: 136: 135: 127:Jungle primary 114: 103:Single vote - 101: 96: 95: 92: 91: 89: 88: 78: 73: 68: 63: 57: 54: 53: 43: 42: 32: 31: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1955: 1944: 1941: 1940: 1938: 1926: 1920: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1903: 1900: 1897: 1893: 1887: 1884: 1880: 1874: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1857: 1854: 1840: 1831: 1828: 1814: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1785: 1782: 1779: 1775: 1766: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1739:9781317348825 1736: 1732: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1703: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1679: 1676: 1672: 1670: 1664: 1655: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1615: 1609: 1607: 1603: 1595: 1594: 1587: 1584: 1578: 1575: 1563: 1557: 1554: 1548: 1546: 1544: 1535: 1533: 1531: 1523: 1521: 1519: 1515: 1507: 1505: 1503: 1499: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1455: 1453: 1449: 1446: 1442: 1434: 1431: 1427: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1393: 1391: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1376: 1374: 1370: 1362: 1360: 1354: 1352: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1330: 1325: 1323: 1319: 1317: 1313: 1309: 1299: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1270: 1268: 1265: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1249: 1246: 1243: 1241:Sean Stephens 1240: 1239: 1235: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1223: 1221:Maurice Vuong 1220: 1219: 1215: 1213:David Higgins 1212: 1209: 1207:Nikki Norrman 1206: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1195: 1193:Rick Vogelman 1192: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1175: 1171: 1168: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1154:Pranav Kapoor 1152: 1151: 1148: 1145: 1143: 1140: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1116: 1114: 1111: 1109: 1106: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1095: 1092: 1089: 1086: 1083: 1080: 1079: 1068: 1062: 1055: 1053: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1015:Liechtenstein 1011: 1009: 1005: 1001: 995: 956: 945: 940: 938: 933: 931: 926: 925: 923: 922: 919: 914: 906: 901: 896: 894: 889: 884: 883: 881: 880: 873: 870: 868: 865: 863: 862:May's theorem 860: 858: 855: 853: 850: 849: 848: 847: 840: 837: 835: 832: 830: 827: 825: 822: 820: 817: 816: 815: 814: 808: 803: 802: 795: 792: 790: 787: 785: 782: 780: 777: 776: 775: 774: 773: 772:majority rule 770:Paradoxes of 764: 761: 759: 756: 754: 751: 749: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 732: 729: 728: 727: 724: 722: 719: 717: 714: 713: 712: 711: 704: 701: 699: 696: 694: 691: 689: 686: 685: 684: 679: 674: 673: 666: 663: 659: 656: 655: 654: 651: 650: 649: 648: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 625: 624: 621: 615: 612: 610: 607: 606: 605: 602: 598: 593: 589: 587: 582: 578: 577: 576: 573: 572: 571: 570: 566: 562: 559: 557: 554: 552: 549: 547: 544: 543: 542: 541: 536: 535: 534: 528: 525: 523: 520: 519: 518: 513: 512:Mixed systems 508: 507: 500: 497: 493: 490: 489: 488: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 473: 472:Random ballot 470: 468: 465: 463: 460: 456: 453: 451: 448: 447: 446: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 431: 428: 426: 423: 421: 418: 416: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 401: 398: 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 369: 366: 364: 361: 359: 356: 354: 351: 349: 346: 345: 344: 341: 337: 334: 332: 329: 327: 324: 322: 319: 318: 317: 316:Apportionment 314: 313: 312: 311: 305: 300: 299: 292: 289: 287: 284: 282: 279: 277: 274: 273: 272: 271: 270: 261: 257: 252: 251:Antiplurality 249: 246: 242: 237: 234: 231: 227: 222: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 205: 202: 200: 197: 195: 192: 190: 187: 186: 185: 182: 180: 179:Condorcet-IRV 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 163: 158: 154: 152: 147: 143: 142: 141: 138: 134: 131: 130: 128: 123: 118: 115: 113: 110: 109: 108: 106: 99: 94: 93: 86: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 67: 64: 62: 61:Social choice 59: 58: 56: 55: 49: 45: 44: 41: 37: 36:Social choice 33: 29: 25: 21: 20: 1919: 1911: 1902: 1895: 1886: 1877:(in German) 1873: 1866:Wahlrecht.de 1865: 1862:Panaschieren 1856: 1843:. Retrieved 1830: 1817:. Retrieved 1804: 1796: 1784: 1777: 1770:(in Spanish) 1765: 1757: 1748: 1730: 1725: 1717: 1702: 1694: 1687:Bert Anciaux 1685:Jan Loones, 1678: 1666: 1654: 1646: 1625:Accumulating 1592: 1586: 1577: 1565:. Retrieved 1556: 1539: 1527: 1511: 1474:Panaschieren 1473: 1459: 1450: 1443:, voters in 1438: 1429: 1410: 1397: 1377: 1366: 1358: 1334: 1320: 1305: 1277:Jane Janeson 1266: 1262:Megan Vargas 1261: 1253:John Johnson 1188: 1183: 1163:Allison Cook 1158: 1153: 1146: 1141: 1130: 1125: 1112: 1107: 1059: 1012: 954: 953: 845: 844: 811: 769: 768: 753:Exaggeration 739: 738: 709: 708: 682: 646: 645: 614:Mixed ballot 569:Compensatory 567: 540:compensatory 537: 532: 516: 478: 477: 436: 435: 406: 405: 376: 375: 363:List-free PR 357: 308: 276:Score voting 267: 266: 212: 211: 199:Ranked pairs 170: 169: 102: 1835:(in French) 1809:(in French) 1707:(in French) 1683:(in French) 1659:(in French) 1536:Switzerland 1460:Of sixteen 1414:adopted an 1412:El Salvador 1407:El Salvador 1343:, and from 1308:apportioned 1177:Judy Bogart 1126:Matt Wright 1101:Alice Brown 1031:El Salvador 1023:Switzerland 653:Single vote 556:Conditional 551:Coexistence 400:Quota Borda 390:Schulze STV 348:Closed list 291:STAR voting 236:Borda count 1845:3 November 1819:3 November 1758:Tico Times 1593:Elecciones 1549:References 1524:Luxembourg 1400:Ecuadorian 1367:Until the 1326:By country 1247:John Smith 1142:Sam Miller 1019:Luxembourg 758:Truncation 487:Cumulative 310:Party-list 85:By country 76:Comparison 1416:open list 1388:Volksunie 1386:from the 1331:Argentina 1297:LCC Total 1291:NCP Total 1285:SDP Total 1093:Candidate 1087:Candidate 1081:Candidate 1048:, and in 960:English: 955:Panachage 665:Dual-vote 358:Panachage 353:Open list 343:List type 221:Plurality 117:Two-round 105:plurality 28:Economics 1937:Category 1892:Honduras 1639:Archived 1628:Archived 1617:Archived 1518:Honduras 1508:Honduras 1502:Saarland 1384:senators 1035:Honduras 385:Hare STV 24:Politics 22:A joint 1470:Hamburg 1464:, two ( 1456:Germany 1398:In the 1394:Ecuador 1373:Belgium 1363:Belgium 1355:Austria 1300:13,072 1046:Czechia 1027:Ecuador 395:CPO-STV 245:Baldwin 194:Schulze 189:Minimax 107:methods 1881:, 2016 1737:  1567:14 Aug 1494:Berlin 1466:Bremen 1439:Since 1435:France 1294:23,413 1288:24,994 1196:2,217 1172:1,214 1120:3,901 1096:Votes 1042:states 1039:German 1033:, and 1021:, and 260:Coombs 30:series 1742:p.339 1597:(PDF) 1480:uses 1335:From 1267:5,455 1250:2,087 1244:1,867 1224:2,725 1210:1,254 1204:3,213 1189:5,873 1180:3,113 1166:3,901 1159:3,313 1147:4,662 1138:4,195 1131:3,901 1113:4,662 1104:1,407 1090:Votes 1084:Votes 1044:, in 597:'MMP' 586:'AMS' 1847:2014 1821:2014 1735:ISBN 1569:2019 1514:2005 1500:and 1468:and 1441:2014 1349:1962 1347:and 1345:1958 1341:1948 1337:1912 1236:328 1216:749 538:Non- 492:SNTV 81:List 38:and 26:and 1894:", 1795:", 1791:, " 1756:", 1716:", 1712:, " 1693:", 1665:", 1492:). 1426:: 1339:to 1274:905 1230:536 1010:). 256:el. 241:el. 230:IRV 226:el. 1939:: 1910:, 1864:, 1605:^ 1545:. 1520:. 1496:, 1280:0 1256:1 1029:, 1017:, 988:ɑː 592:NZ 581:UK 157:US 146:UK 129:) 122:US 1890:" 1851:. 1849:. 1825:. 1823:. 1772:" 1661:" 1612:" 1571:. 1488:( 994:/ 991:ʒ 985:ʃ 982:ˈ 979:ə 976:n 973:ĂŠ 970:p 967:ˌ 964:/ 957:( 943:e 936:t 929:v 594:: 583:: 262:) 253:( 247:) 238:( 232:) 223:( 159:: 148:: 124:: 119:( 87:) 83:(

Index

Politics
Economics
Social choice
electoral systems

Social choice
Mechanism design
Comparative politics
Comparison
List
By country
Single-winner methods
plurality
First preference plurality (FPP)
Two-round
US
Jungle primary
Partisan primary
Instant-runoff
UK
Alternative vote
US
Ranked-choice (RCV)
Condorcet methods
Condorcet-IRV
Round-robin voting
Minimax
Schulze
Ranked pairs
Maximal lottery

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑