Knowledge

Fairlie Mortar

Source 📝

154:) B. S. Smith at Fairlie. The primary purpose, unsurprisingly for Fairlie, was to avoid a disadvantage with ASDIC; the minimum range of ASDIC left a 'hole' immediately ahead of the ship where submarines could not be tracked. A U-boat skipper could wait for this hole, then manoeuvre out of the path of the approaching destroyer. Gravity-dropped depth charges were large, slow-sinking and could only be dropped directly astern. A technique developed during the First World War had been to 'throw' charges sideways, with powered launchers, such as the Thornycroft mortar. By firing enough charges, a large pattern could be fired in the hope that the target would still be somewhere within it. The charges were so heavy that few reloads could be carried and the manual reloading time was so long that any submarine would have escaped before a second salvo. By firing these mortars ahead instead and by using a smaller, streamlined and faster-sinking projectile, the hope was to destroy a target submarine before ASDIC contact had been lost. 163:
with a more robust mounting on the ship. A similar problem beset the Thornycroft projector which used heavy charges and was limited to only five, an inadequate pattern, if they were to be thrown far enough to still be ahead of the ship when they detonated. Fairlie's mortar bombs carried only 20 lb (9.1 kg) of explosive filling and used a lead ballast weight to keep them nose-down for faster sinking. A production bomb was expected to need around 60 lb (27 kg) of filling and to avoid the 'wasted' mass of pure ballast. They were detonated by a nose
179:
to which they were supposedly not taking part. They had faith in their ASDIC detection and the ability to aim a small number of powerful weapons close to a target but lacked political support to develop this further. The Thornycroft weapon was too heavy to be automatically controlled and Hedgehog believed it to be unnecessary. Eventually the
223:
and were fired in pairs from each side, with a 0.1 second automatic delay between pairs firing, to reduce the recoil load on the mount. The launcher was well thought out for ease of operation and could be tilted horizontally, to allow re-loading with a simple trolley, rather than the vertical lift on
178:
and Thornycroft team who favoured mortars (like Fairlie) but wanted them to be very heavy and the DMWD that had no faith in any ability to aim such a weapon and so favoured quantity over quality with large numbers of small Hedgehog projectiles. Fairlie were caught between these, in an offensive field
222:
Parsnip or 'Mortar A' was a response to the concerns over the small size of Hedgehog and was a revival of the Fairlie Mortar, now with two rows of ten mortar tubes, each projectile carrying a 60 lb (27 kg) charge. Parsnip's tubes were aligned to fire a circular pattern, half from each row,
162:
the mortar onto the ASDIC bearing. The initial Fairlie projectile was lightweight, limited by the power of the propellant charge and the strength of the deck to support the mortar. This was recognised to be too light for service use and a developed version would need to be heavier, more powerful and
227:
that the Thornycroft had required, and which would have made it impossible to reload in most mid-Atlantic conditions. The propellant, at least for the trials, was a separate breech-loading cartridge, being easier to store separately from the less-sensitive but heavier projectiles, and allowing for
267:
period. These were one or two installations of three-barrelled forward-throwing heavy mortars. They were controlled directly by the ASDIC system, first the Type 147 sonar and tracked the target continuously. When the target was at the optimum location, they were fired automatically. They were
268:
controllable in bearing, depth and (for Limbo) range. The three mortars had a fixed relationship to each other, giving a triangular pattern around the target. The projectile was a heavy depth charge, of around 400 lb (180 kg) weight with 200 lb (91 kg) of
242:
in May. Fairlie's main work up to this time had returned to ASDIC, with the Type 144Q ASDIC in late 1942, then the Type 147. The Q attachment gave a paper recording of the target bearing, with a much narrower beam in plan view than the 144 set. The 147 set with its
196:, requiring a direct hit to explode. Even then there were concerns that the projectiles might fail seriously to damage the target, if they hit a non-critical casing or sail, rather than the pressure hull. To counteract this, their 30 lb (14 kg) 157:
The mortar used two racks of ten tubes, mounted on the forecastle. The tubes were in line fore-and-aft, mounted on a swinging frame. Based on their work with ASDIC, this was roll-stabilised against the ship's motion and could also be used to
78:
coast before the war but was dispersed northwards to escape the fighting and risk of bombing, to the Fife Boatyard in Scotland. The boatyard would provide facilities for ASDIC development and sometimes, with nearby
191:
Hedgehog took the opposing view to Fairlie's vision: it used a large number of lightweight projectiles, and a 'scatter-gun' approach to targeting. This was much simpler to achieve; the projectiles were
90:
but was not large enough to build ships as a strategic shipyard. As the research establishment was established to develop the ASDIC sensor, rather than offensive weapons, this led to conflict with
247:'sword' transducer produced a horizontal 'fan' beam that could give a depth estimate. Both of these improved targeting for a weapon, unlike Hedgehog, capable of making use of this information. 652: 238:
in February 1943. Performance was thought to be adequate but Hedgehog was already well-established and the next generation, Squid, was almost ready for its trials on
125: 174:, the Fairlie team's regular trials ship since their time at Portland, these trials seem to have been cut short. There was a conflict between teams: the 628: 607: 586: 553: 564: 333: 255:
The Fairlie Mortar's legacy was as a concept for small numbers of powerful, well-aimed weapons and as a step towards the development of
54:
projecting 24 small bombs from a platform, eventually became the predominant British ship-borne anti-submarine weapon in the war.
117: 91: 647: 264: 170:
The Fairlie Mortar was unsuccessful, as much due to politics as to technical failings. Although it may have been tested on
576: 618: 597: 543: 180: 67: 201: 35: 105:
had long been the navy's torpedo school and saw itself as having responsibility for offensive weapons.
277: 140:. Developments over the next few years were characterised by disagreements between the three groups. 84: 232: 46:, each containing 20 lb (9.1 kg) of explosive. The Fairlie Mortar was not a success and ' 214:
in September 1943, when a Hedgehog misfired and killed 16 of the crew, causing extensive damage.
109: 17: 624: 603: 582: 549: 280:
and the charges were intended to detonate simultaneously around the target, giving a combined
276:, which was set automatically between loading and firing. This was better synchronised than a 269: 137: 121: 47: 71: 39: 42:. It projected small anti-submarine bombs simultaneously, ten from each side of the ship's 572: 207:. There was also distrust by the crews of their Hedgehogs, after incidents like that on 539: 260: 256: 641: 133: 51: 208: 193: 244: 164: 281: 159: 98: 43: 497: 273: 80: 228:
easier trials of different propellant charges and projectile weights.
167:, needing to sink near-vertical if this was to be triggered reliably. 599:
Depth Charge!: Mines, Depth Charges and Underwater Weapons, 1914–1945
204: 200:
charge was increased to 35 lb (16 kg) of the more powerful
150: 75: 482: 272:
filling. They were shaped to sink quickly and predictably and had a
578:
British Destroyers & Frigates: The Second World War & After
183:
became embroiled and B. S. Smith was removed from control in 1942.
224: 63: 112:
to develop an anti-submarine weapon, the Fairlie Mortar, whilst
545:
Atlantic Escorts: Ships, Weapons & Tactics in World War II
197: 148:
The Fairlie Mortar was developed by the civilian scientist (
452: 450: 448: 446: 316: 314: 312: 108:
In January 1940, Fairlie was allowed a partnership with
409: 407: 405: 403: 299: 297: 378: 376: 363: 361: 359: 124:', based on Thornycroft's First World War mortar. The 70:. The research establishment had been established at 62:
The Fairlie Mortar was developed by the Royal Navy's
334:"Explosive send off for Fairlie sub base after WW2" 653:World War II naval weapons of the United Kingdom 126:Department of Miscellaneous Weapons Development 8: 263:, the dominant anti-submarine mortar of the 97:, the Royal Navy's shore establishment in 483:"ASDIC/Sonar Equipment Types - Section B" 413: 456: 320: 293: 382: 303: 522: 510: 468: 437: 425: 394: 367: 350: 7: 25: 338:Largs & Millport Weekly News 498:"144 and 147 ASDIC beam shapes" 132:) were advocating the multiple 18:Parsnip (anti-submarine mortar) 58:Fairlie research establishment 1: 83:, a base for the trials ship 231:The apparatus was tested on 34:was an unsuccessful British 66:-research establishment at 669: 259:or 'Mortar B' and in turn 181:Director of Naval Ordnance 563:DiGiulian, Tony (2019). 397:, pp. 115–116, 119. 120:to develop the similar ' 602:. Casemate Publishers. 581:. Seaforth Publishing. 548:. Seaforth Publishing. 68:Fairlie, North Ayrshire 648:Anti-submarine mortars 617:Lavery, Brian (2012). 596:Henry, Chris (2005). 565:"Britain ASW Weapons" 36:anti-submarine mortar 27:Anti-submarine weapon 496:Proc, Jerry (2019). 481:Proc, Jerry (2019). 130:Wheezers and Dodgers 38:design of the early 513:, pp. 119–120. 471:, pp. 54, 119. 428:, pp. 116–120. 274:clockwork time fuze 136:that would become 116:collaborated with 110:Vickers-Armstrongs 630:978-0-85-790542-0 609:978-1-84-415174-5 588:978-1-84-832015-4 555:978-1-84-415702-0 122:Five Wide Virgins 16:(Redirected from 660: 634: 620:Shield of Empire 613: 592: 573:Friedman, Norman 568: 559: 526: 520: 514: 508: 502: 501: 493: 487: 486: 478: 472: 466: 460: 454: 441: 435: 429: 423: 417: 414:DiGiulian (2019) 411: 398: 392: 386: 380: 371: 365: 354: 348: 342: 341: 330: 324: 318: 307: 301: 278:hydrostatic fuze 72:Portland Harbour 40:second World War 21: 668: 667: 663: 662: 661: 659: 658: 657: 638: 637: 631: 616: 610: 595: 589: 571: 567:. navweaps.com. 562: 556: 540:Brown, David K. 538: 535: 530: 529: 521: 517: 509: 505: 495: 494: 490: 480: 479: 475: 467: 463: 457:Friedman (2012) 455: 444: 440:, pp. 119. 436: 432: 424: 420: 412: 401: 393: 389: 381: 374: 366: 357: 349: 345: 340:. 9 March 2015. 332: 331: 327: 321:Friedman (2012) 319: 310: 302: 295: 290: 253: 251:Squid and Limbo 220: 189: 146: 60: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 666: 664: 656: 655: 650: 640: 639: 636: 635: 629: 614: 608: 593: 587: 569: 560: 554: 534: 531: 528: 527: 525:, p. 161. 515: 503: 488: 473: 461: 459:, p. 146. 442: 430: 418: 399: 387: 372: 370:, p. 164. 355: 353:, p. 163. 343: 325: 323:, p. 138. 308: 306:, p. 375. 292: 291: 289: 286: 252: 249: 219: 216: 188: 185: 145: 144:Fairlie Mortar 142: 59: 56: 32:Fairlie Mortar 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 665: 654: 651: 649: 646: 645: 643: 632: 626: 622: 621: 615: 611: 605: 601: 600: 594: 590: 584: 580: 579: 574: 570: 566: 561: 557: 551: 547: 546: 541: 537: 536: 532: 524: 519: 516: 512: 507: 504: 499: 492: 489: 484: 477: 474: 470: 465: 462: 458: 453: 451: 449: 447: 443: 439: 434: 431: 427: 422: 419: 415: 410: 408: 406: 404: 400: 396: 391: 388: 385:, p. 23. 384: 383:Lavery (2012) 379: 377: 373: 369: 364: 362: 360: 356: 352: 347: 344: 339: 335: 329: 326: 322: 317: 315: 313: 309: 305: 304:Lavery (2012) 300: 298: 294: 287: 285: 283: 279: 275: 271: 266: 262: 258: 250: 248: 246: 241: 237: 236: 229: 226: 217: 215: 213: 212: 206: 203: 202:aluminiumised 199: 195: 194:contact-fuzed 186: 184: 182: 177: 173: 168: 166: 161: 155: 153: 152: 143: 141: 139: 135: 134:spigot mortar 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 111: 106: 104: 100: 96: 95: 89: 88: 82: 77: 73: 69: 65: 57: 55: 53: 52:spigot mortar 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 19: 619: 598: 577: 544: 533:Bibliography 523:Brown (2007) 518: 511:Brown (2007) 506: 491: 476: 469:Brown (2007) 464: 438:Brown (2007) 433: 426:Brown (2007) 421: 395:Brown (2007) 390: 368:Henry (2005) 351:Henry (2005) 346: 337: 328: 254: 239: 234: 230: 221: 210: 190: 175: 171: 169: 156: 149: 147: 129: 113: 107: 102: 93: 86: 61: 31: 29: 623:. Birlinn. 245:beamforming 165:impact fuze 118:Thornycroft 642:Categories 288:References 282:shock wave 172:Kingfisher 99:Portsmouth 87:Kingfisher 44:forecastle 240:Ambuscade 235:Ambuscade 233:HMS  209:HMS  92:HMS  85:HMS  81:Ardrossan 575:(2012). 542:(2007). 265:Cold War 211:Escapade 187:Hedgehog 138:Hedgehog 48:Hedgehog 218:Parsnip 74:on the 627:  606:  585:  552:  225:davits 205:Torpex 176:Vernon 151:boffin 114:Vernon 103:Vernon 94:Vernon 76:Dorset 270:Minol 261:Limbo 257:Squid 128:(the 64:ASDIC 50:', a 625:ISBN 604:ISBN 583:ISBN 550:ISBN 30:The 198:TNT 160:lay 644:: 445:^ 402:^ 375:^ 358:^ 336:. 311:^ 296:^ 284:. 101:. 633:. 612:. 591:. 558:. 500:. 485:. 416:. 20:)

Index

Parsnip (anti-submarine mortar)
anti-submarine mortar
second World War
forecastle
Hedgehog
spigot mortar
ASDIC
Fairlie, North Ayrshire
Portland Harbour
Dorset
Ardrossan
HMS Kingfisher
HMS Vernon
Portsmouth
Vickers-Armstrongs
Thornycroft
Five Wide Virgins
Department of Miscellaneous Weapons Development
spigot mortar
Hedgehog
boffin
lay
impact fuze
Director of Naval Ordnance
contact-fuzed
TNT
aluminiumised
Torpex
HMS Escapade
davits

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.