349:, the Court of Appeals examined whether the punitive damages were appropriate based on (1) the degree of reprehensibility of the conduct, (2) the disparity between the actual harm and the punitive damages, and (3) the difference between the punitive damages and civil penalties allowed in similar cases. While determining the reprehensibility of Philip Morris's actions, the court considered the length of the misinformation campaign and the number of people it had reached, concluding that its actions were so reprehensible that they justified punitive damages 97 times greater than the actual damages. The
31:
990:
831:
1002:
396:
Philip Morris then paid
Williams $ 61 million, as under Oregon law the state collects 60% of all punitive awards and places those funds into a compensation fund for crime victims. After Philip Morris paid Williams, it then fought the state over paying the remaining amount in punitive damages to the
388:
The Court of
Appeals again reinstated the $ 79.5 million judgment. On appeal, the Oregon Supreme Court affirmed, also holding that the courts can consider evidence of similar conduct to other people in Oregon–even those not party to the lawsuit–when awarding punitive damages. Philip Morris then
330:
and $ 79.5 million in punitive damages. At that time, the verdict was the largest against a tobacco company. The trial court found that the compensatory damages exceeded the state cap and the punitive damages were "grossly excessive". It reduced the respective amounts to $ 521,485.50 and $ 32
389:
appealed again to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2008, arguing that the Oregon
Supreme Court ignored the guidance the U.S. Supreme Court had given as to punitive damages. In March 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court in essence affirmed the lower court decision when it withdrew their writ of
401:
prevented Oregon from collecting. The Oregon
Supreme Court again disagreed with Philip Morris in December 2011 and ruled that they had to pay the remaining punitive damages, which after interest then totaled $ 99 million.
1058:
291:
269:
655:
596:
538:
416:
411:
131:
123:
86:
1033:
1028:
648:
421:
1048:
1043:
1038:
616:
904:
1063:
1005:
641:
398:
357:
345:
283:
35:
1053:
322:
based on Philip Morris advertisements and sponsored studies that made cigarettes seem less dangerous than they actually were. At
561:
506:
447:
672:
607:
374:
the case to the Oregon Court of
Appeals for that court to reconsider the amount of the punitive damages award in light of
861:
970:
937:
755:
664:
480:
54:
Philip Morris USA, Petitioner v. Mayola
Williams, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jesse D. Williams, Deceased
994:
785:
909:
715:
680:
371:
790:
927:
700:
340:
780:
376:
705:
600:
542:
135:
127:
78:
350:
327:
795:
770:
690:
206:
93:
932:
148:
695:
343:
reversed and reinstated the $ 79.5 million judgment. Following the "guideposts" established in
760:
710:
685:
507:"Portland woman beats Big Tobacco: 10-year battle for $ 80 million ends at U.S. Supreme Court"
311:
174:
800:
775:
750:
740:
720:
367:
315:
295:
119:
534:
964:
625:
198:
186:
815:
805:
730:
210:
182:
67:
63:
1022:
877:
566:
101:
151:
bars punitive damages for harm caused to individuals not involved in the litigation.
958:
942:
448:"Philip Morris told to pay $ 81 million in damages to the estate of Jesse Williams"
218:
194:
166:
830:
81:
845:
307:
287:
633:
362:
97:
306:
Mayola
Williams, the widow of Jesse D. Williams, who died of smoking-related
869:
298:, and ordered a lower court to reconsider its damages awards on that basis.
765:
725:
885:
562:"Oregon Supreme Court orders $ 99 million award against Philip Morris"
326:
in 1999, the jury found for
Williams and awarded her $ 821,485.50 in
745:
853:
323:
319:
282:, 549 U.S. 346 (2007), 556 U.S. 178 (2009), was a decision by the
810:
735:
637:
30:
820:
130:
1093 (2008), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted,
1059:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
104:
Prod. Liab. Rep. ¶ 17,676; 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 80
417:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 556
412:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 549
951:
920:
897:
838:
671:
481:"Oregon tobacco judgment back before Supreme Court"
263:
255:
247:
239:
231:
226:
155:
142:
114:
109:
73:
59:
49:
42:
23:
235:Breyer, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Souter, Alito
122:1255, 344 Or. 45 (2008), cert. granted in part,
441:
439:
437:
649:
8:
555:
553:
551:
399:tobacco settlement signed by Oregon in 1998
656:
642:
634:
20:
422:List of United States Supreme Court cases
1034:United States civil due process case law
433:
474:
472:
470:
468:
18:2007 United States Supreme Court case
7:
1001:
505:Roberts, Michelle (April 1, 2009).
446:O'Neill, Patrick (March 21, 1999).
531:Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Williams
479:Pope, Charles (December 3, 2008).
358:Supreme Court of the United States
346:BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
284:Supreme Court of the United States
259:Ginsburg, joined by Scalia, Thomas
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1029:United States Supreme Court cases
603:346 (2007) is available from:
560:Green, Aimee (December 2, 2011).
1000:
989:
988:
829:
370:the Court of Appeals' judgment,
29:
1049:United States tobacco case law
1044:2009 in United States case law
1039:2007 in United States case law
1:
862:Rothmans, Benson & Hedges
593:Philip Morris USA v. Williams
279:Philip Morris USA v. Williams
24:Philip Morris USA v. Williams
1064:Smoking in the United States
665:Philip Morris International
366:, and in the 2007 decision
1080:
984:
827:
397:state, claiming that the
268:
160:
147:
45:Decided February 20, 2007
28:
1054:Philip Morris litigation
100:1332; 75 U.S.L.W. 4101;
341:Oregon Court of Appeals
43:Argued October 31, 2006
377:State Farm v. Campbell
316:cigarette manufacturer
286:, which held that the
270:U.S. Const. amend. XIV
92:127 S. Ct. 1057; 166
928:André Calantzopoulos
351:Oregon Supreme Court
328:compensatory damages
302:Trial court decision
292:Fourteenth Amendment
696:Benson & Hedges
207:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
171:Associate Justices
1016:
1015:
995:Tobacco companies
973:Last Week Tonight
711:Canadian Classics
312:Philip Morris USA
275:
274:
1071:
1004:
1003:
992:
991:
890:
882:
874:
866:
858:
850:
833:
658:
651:
644:
635:
630:
624:
621:
615:
612:
606:
579:
578:
576:
574:
557:
546:
528:
522:
521:
519:
517:
502:
496:
495:
493:
491:
476:
463:
462:
460:
458:
443:
296:punitive damages
156:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1012:
980:
965:Marlboro Friday
947:
933:Louis Camilleri
916:
893:
888:
880:
872:
864:
856:
848:
834:
825:
667:
662:
628:
622:
619:
613:
610:
604:
588:
583:
582:
572:
570:
559:
558:
549:
545:___ (2009).
529:
525:
515:
513:
504:
503:
499:
489:
487:
478:
477:
466:
456:
454:
445:
444:
435:
430:
408:
386:
384:Later decisions
353:denied review.
339:On appeal, the
337:
304:
209:
199:Clarence Thomas
197:
187:Anthony Kennedy
185:
175:John P. Stevens
118:On remand, 176
105:
66:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1077:
1075:
1067:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1036:
1031:
1021:
1020:
1014:
1013:
1011:
1010:
998:
985:
982:
981:
979:
978:
968:
962:
955:
953:
949:
948:
946:
945:
940:
935:
930:
924:
922:
918:
917:
915:
914:
911:PMI v. Uruguay
907:
905:Imperial Group
901:
899:
895:
894:
892:
891:
883:
875:
867:
859:
851:
842:
840:
836:
835:
828:
826:
824:
823:
818:
816:Virginia Slims
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
683:
677:
675:
669:
668:
663:
661:
660:
653:
646:
638:
632:
631:
617:Google Scholar
587:
586:External links
584:
581:
580:
547:
523:
497:
464:
432:
431:
429:
426:
425:
424:
419:
414:
407:
404:
385:
382:
336:
333:
310:in 1997, sued
303:
300:
290:clause of the
273:
272:
266:
265:
261:
260:
257:
253:
252:
249:
245:
244:
241:
237:
236:
233:
229:
228:
224:
223:
222:
221:
211:Stephen Breyer
183:Antonin Scalia
172:
169:
164:
158:
157:
153:
152:
145:
144:
140:
139:
138:178 (2009)
116:
112:
111:
107:
106:
91:
75:
71:
70:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1076:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1035:
1032:
1030:
1027:
1026:
1024:
1009:
1008:
999:
997:
996:
987:
986:
983:
976:
974:
969:
966:
963:
960:
957:
956:
954:
950:
944:
941:
939:
938:Philip Morris
936:
934:
931:
929:
926:
925:
923:
919:
913:
912:
908:
906:
903:
902:
900:
896:
887:
884:
879:
878:Swedish Match
876:
871:
868:
863:
860:
857:(Philippines)
855:
852:
847:
844:
843:
841:
837:
832:
822:
819:
817:
814:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
786:Philip Morris
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
678:
676:
674:
670:
666:
659:
654:
652:
647:
645:
640:
639:
636:
627:
618:
609:
602:
598:
594:
590:
589:
585:
569:
568:
567:The Oregonian
563:
556:
554:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
527:
524:
512:
511:The Oregonian
508:
501:
498:
486:
485:The Oregonian
482:
475:
473:
471:
469:
465:
453:
452:The Oregonian
449:
442:
440:
438:
434:
427:
423:
420:
418:
415:
413:
410:
409:
405:
403:
400:
394:
392:
383:
381:
379:
378:
373:
369:
365:
364:
360:then granted
359:
354:
352:
348:
347:
342:
334:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
301:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
271:
267:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
227:Case opinions
225:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:Chief Justice
162:
161:
159:
154:
150:
146:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
108:
103:
99:
95:
89:
88:
83:
80:
76:
72:
69:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1006:
993:
972:
959:Marlboro Man
943:Jacek Olczak
910:
839:Subsidiaries
716:Chesterfield
681:Apollo-Soyuz
592:
571:. Retrieved
565:
530:
526:
514:. Retrieved
510:
500:
488:. Retrieved
484:
455:. Retrieved
451:
395:
390:
387:
375:
361:
355:
344:
338:
305:
278:
277:
276:
264:Laws applied
219:Samuel Alito
214:
202:
195:David Souter
190:
178:
167:John Roberts
110:Case history
85:
53:
15:
971:"Tobacco" (
961:(1954–1999)
873:(Indonesia)
854:PMFTC, Inc.
846:Papastratos
701:Bond Street
573:December 2,
516:December 3,
490:December 3,
457:December 3,
308:lung cancer
288:due process
149:Due Process
60:Docket nos.
1023:Categories
898:Litigation
781:Parliament
428:References
391:certiorari
363:certiorari
115:Subsequent
98:U.S. LEXIS
96:940; 2007
889:(England)
870:Sampoerna
791:Portugues
756:Longbeach
706:Cambridge
372:remanding
331:million.
94:L. Ed. 2d
74:Citations
881:(Sweden)
865:(Canada)
849:(Greece)
766:Marlboro
726:Craven A
591:Text of
406:See also
232:Majority
1007:Commons
886:Vectura
796:Raffles
771:Muratti
746:L&M
691:Belmont
608:Findlaw
535:07-1216
368:vacated
335:Appeals
294:limits
256:Dissent
248:Dissent
243:Stevens
240:Dissent
143:Holding
68:07-1216
64:05-1256
977:(2015)
967:(1993)
921:People
673:Brands
629:
626:Justia
623:
620:
614:
611:
605:
537:,
533:, No.
318:, for
251:Thomas
217:
215:·
213:
205:
203:·
201:
193:
191:·
189:
181:
179:·
177:
952:Media
761:Merit
686:Basic
599:
541:
324:trial
320:fraud
134:
126:
811:Veev
801:Ritz
776:Next
751:Lark
741:Karo
736:IQOS
721:Colt
601:U.S.
575:2011
543:U.S.
518:2011
492:2011
459:2011
356:The
314:, a
136:U.S.
128:U.S.
120:P.3d
87:more
79:U.S.
77:549
821:Zyn
597:549
539:556
132:556
124:553
102:CCH
82:346
1025::
806:SG
731:F6
595:,
564:.
550:^
509:.
483:.
467:^
450:.
436:^
393:.
380:.
975:)
657:e
650:t
643:v
577:.
520:.
494:.
461:.
90:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.