Knowledge (XXG)

Phonetic transcription

Source 📝

73: 852: 500:. It was created in the nineteenth century by European language teachers and linguists. It soon developed beyond its original purpose as a tool of foreign language pedagogy and is now also used extensively as a practical alphabet of phoneticians and linguists. It is found in many dictionaries, where it is used to indicate the pronunciation of words, but most American dictionaries for native English-speakers, e.g., 269:) are often not modified to take account of such changes, and do not accurately represent the pronunciation. Words borrowed from other languages may retain the spelling from the original language, which may have a different system of correspondences between written symbols and speech sounds. Pronunciation can also vary greatly among dialects of a language. Standard orthography in some languages, such as 485: 32: 135: 901:(1943). Pike's system, which is part of a larger goal of scientific description of phonetics, is particularly interesting in its challenge against the descriptive method of the phoneticians who created alphabetic systems like the IPA. An example of Pike's system can be demonstrated by the following. A 656:
Strictly speaking, it is not possible to have a distinction between "broad" and "narrow" within phonemic transcription, since the symbols chosen represent only sounds that have been shown to be distinctive. However, the symbols themselves may be more or less explicit about their phonetic realization.
454:
that may be unfamiliar to nonspecialists. Broad transcription usually allows statements to be made which apply across accents and dialects, and is thus more appropriate for the pronunciation data in ordinary dictionaries, which may discuss phonetic details in the preface but rarely give them for each
320:
A basic principle of phonetic transcription is that it should be applicable to all languages, and its symbols should denote the same phonetic properties whatever the language being transcribed. It follows that a transcription devised for one individual language or group of languages is not a phonetic
889:
to denote the composition of chemical compounds. Although more descriptive than alphabetic notation, analphabetic notation is less practical for many purposes (e.g. for descriptive linguists doing fieldwork or for speech pathologists transcribing their impressions of speech disorders). As a result,
884:
phonetic notation. Instead of both the alphabetic and iconic notational types' general principle of using one symbol per sound, analphabetic notation uses long sequences of symbols to precisely describe the component features of an articulatory gesture (MacMahon 1996:842–844). This type of notation
316:
For most languages, phonetic transcription makes it possible to show pronunciation with something much nearer to a one-to-one relationship between sound and symbol than is possible with the language's orthography. Phonetic transcription allows one to step outside orthography, examine differences in
345:
is a particularly broad transcription that disregards all allophonic differences (for example the differences between individual speakers or even whole dialects of the same language). Phonemic transcription provides a representation only of a language's abstract word-distinguishing units of sound
362:
The advantage of narrower transcription is that it can help learners to produce exactly the right sound and allows linguists to make detailed analyses of language variation. The disadvantage is that a narrow transcription is rarely representative of all dialects or speakers of a language. Most
637:
in a narrow transcription would be , which notes several phonetic features that may not be evident even to a native speaker. An example of a broad transcription is , which indicates only some of the features that are easier to hear. A yet broader transcription would be in which every symbol
863:
phonetic notation, the shapes of the phonetic characters are designed so that they visually represent the position of articulators in the vocal tract. This is unlike alphabetic notation, where the correspondence between character shape and articulator position is arbitrary. This notation is
559:
phonetic alphabet despite having been widely used for languages outside the Americas. The principal difference between these alphabets and the IPA is that the specially created characters of the IPA are abandoned in favour of already existing typewriter characters with diacritics (e.g. many
438:
is also possible that ignores all the above specifics of these aforementioned dialects; this can be useful in situations where minor details are not important to distinguish or where the emphasis is on overarching patterns. For example, one typical phonemic transcription for the word
638:
represents an unambiguous speech sound but without going into any unnecessary detail. None of those transcriptions makes any claims about the phonemic status of the sounds. Instead, they represent certain ways in which it is possible to produce the sounds that make up the word.
732:
in English, they receive separate symbols in the phonemic analysis. However, a native English speaker would recognize that underneath this, they represent the same plural ending. This can be indicated with the pipe notation. If the plural ending is thought to be essentially an
657:
A frequently cited example is the symbol chosen for the English consonant at the beginning of the words 'rue', 'rye', 'red': this is frequently transcribed as /r/, despite the symbol suggesting an association with the IPA symbol which is used for a tongue-tip
463:
Most phonetic transcription is based on the assumption that linguistic sounds are segmentable into discrete units that can be represented by symbols. Many different types of transcription, or "notation", have been tried out: these may be divided into
669:; this is the more common realization for English pronunciation in America and England. Phonemic symbols will frequently be chosen to avoid diacritics as much as possible, under a 'one sound one symbol' policy, or may even be restricted to the 354:
focuses on more exact articulatory or acoustic details, whether in a broader or narrower way. A transcription which includes some allophonic detail but is still closely linked to the phonemic structure of an utterance is called an
1622:. International Journal of American Linguistics (Vol. 24, No. 1, Part 3); Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, publ. 7. Baltimore. (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1953). 619:"/ /" instead. If one is unsure, it is best to use brackets since by setting off a transcription with slashes, one makes a theoretical claim that every symbol phonemically contrasts for the language being transcribed. 1561: 572:. In the days before it was possible to create phonetic fonts for computer printers and computerized typesetting, this system allowed material to be typed on existing typewriters to create printable material. 622:
For phonetic transcriptions, there is flexibility in how closely sounds may be transcribed. A transcription that gives only a basic idea of the sounds of a language in the broadest terms is called a
426:
can be represented as something like in many American, Canadian, and Australian accents but in a southern England accent. Furthermore, in Australian accents especially, the first-syllable vowel of
434:
than in North America, leading to the possibility of employing an even narrower phonetic transcription to indicate this, such as . On the other hand, a broad phonemic transcription of
689:, which is easier to type. Phonemic symbols should always be backed up by an explanation of their use and meaning, especially when they are as divergent from actual pronunciation as 626:; in some cases, it may be equivalent to a phonemic transcription (only without any theoretical claims). A close transcription, indicating precise details of the sounds, is called a 1653:
The Principles of the International Phonetic Association, Being a Description of the International Phonetic Alphabet and the Manner of Using It, Illustrated by Texts in 51 Languages
341:
in the utterance. The difference between broad and narrow is a continuum, but the difference between phonemic and phonetic transcription is usually treated as a binary distinction.
337:. Broad transcription indicates only the most noticeable phonetic features of an utterance, whereas narrow transcription encodes more information about the phonetic details of the 791:, then a diaphonemic transcription that accommodates for variety A and variety B at the same time would transcribe the three lexical sets in three different ways, for instance 502: 447:, as is common in both British and American English dictionaries. (Slashes, rather than square brackets, are used to indicate phonemic rather than phonetic representations.) 641:
There are also several possibilities in how to transcribe the word phonemically, but here, the differences are generally of not precision but analysis. For example,
468:(which are based on the same principle as that which governs ordinary alphabetic writing, namely that of using one single simple symbol to represent each sound) and 510: 506: 864:
potentially more flexible than alphabetic notation in showing more shades of pronunciation (MacMahon 1996:838–841). An example of iconic phonetic notation is the
497: 839:. It is also common to italicize such words, but the chevrons indicate specifically that they are in the original language's orthography, and not in English 653:. The latter transcription suggests that there are two vowels in the word even if they cannot both be heard, but the former suggests that there is only one. 377: 156: 143: 823:
To avoid confusion with IPA symbols, it may be desirable to specify when native orthography is being used, so that, for example, the English word
45: 2010: 1985: 1930: 1809: 1784: 1737: 1711: 1667: 1635: 1514: 521: 329:
Phonetic transcription may be used to transcribe the phones of a language. In all systems of transcription there is a distinction between
94: 600: 1859: 1834: 181: 116: 59: 1556: 768:
transcription. Diaphonemic transcriptions accommodate for the variation between the phonemic systems of different varieties or
493: 250: 220: 202: 630:. They are not binary choices but the ends of a continuum, with many possibilities in between. All are enclosed in brackets. 20: 317:
pronunciation between dialects within a given language and identify changes in pronunciation that may take place over time.
1541: 556: 527:
Another commonly encountered alphabetic tradition was originally created by American linguists for the transcription of
455:
entry. Most linguists use a narrow transcription only when necessary, and at all other times use a broad transcription.
413: 2062: 1551: 51: 87: 81: 1499: 309:
between orthography and pronunciation, while a few languages may claim to have a fully phonemic spelling system (a
148: 1488: 528: 350:), and thus is not really a phonetic transcription at all (though at times it may coincide with one). Instead, a 98: 1595: 816:
would mean ‘pronounced in variety A and in variety B.’ Other ways to mark diaphonemic transcriptions include
701: 548: 1660:
Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: a guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet
869: 277:, is often irregular and makes it difficult to predict pronunciation from spelling. For example, the words 1519: 813: 809: 802: 795: 761: 754: 750: 742: 738: 725: 721: 717: 713: 690: 686: 682: 662: 650: 646: 444: 407: 383: 364: 216: 212: 1722:
Phonetics: A Critical Analysis of Phonetic Theory and a Technique for the Practical Description of Sounds
1583: 1576: 561: 476:
alphabetic) which represent each sound by a composite symbol made up of a number of signs put together.
1694:
Kemp, J. Alan. (1994). Phonetic Transcription: History. In R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.),
297:
do not rhyme in English even though their spellings might suggest otherwise. Other languages, such as
1757:. Henderson, Eugénie J. A. (Ed.). Language and Language Learning 28. London: Oxford University Press. 666: 520:
systems based on the English alphabet, with diacritical marks over the vowels and stress marks. (See
411: 391: 375: 310: 1702:
MacMahon, Michael K. C. (1996). "Phonetic Notation". In Daniels, Peter T.; Bright, William (eds.).
712:
could be transcribed phonetically as and (in a fairly narrow transcription), and phonemically as
616: 552: 1896: 1684: 536: 450:
A further disadvantage of narrow transcription is that it involves a large number of symbols and
306: 2006: 1981: 1926: 1855: 1830: 1805: 1780: 1733: 1707: 1663: 1631: 1504: 1002:
In Pike's notation there are 5 main components (which are indicated using the example above):
851: 540: 496:(IPA) is the most widely used and well-known of present-day phonetic alphabets and has a long 274: 241: 1648:(Parts 1 & 5). London: Philological Society by Asher & Co.; London: Trübner & Co. 905: 886: 817: 584: 544: 532: 403: 302: 298: 270: 1880: 1589: 1529: 840: 658: 1601: 908: 894: 865: 419: 372: 249:. The most common type of phonetic transcription uses a phonetic alphabet, such as the 1683:
Kelly, John. (1981). The 1847 Alphabet: An Episode of Phonotypy. In R. E. Asher &
2056: 1628:
A handbook of phonetics: "natural" phonetics: articulatory, auditory & functional
262: 1875: 1524: 898: 880:
Another type of phonetic notation that is more precise than alphabetic notation is
697: 399: 393: 1118:
The components of the notational hierarchy of this consonant are explained below:
1606: 1493: 773: 266: 1678:
The Articulations of Speech Sounds Represented by Means of Analphabetic Symbols
390:(often represented as ), but speakers in southern England pronounce the /t/ as 1496:, deliberately nonstandard spelling to demonstrate pronunciation in literature 765: 516: 451: 431: 1509: 769: 604: 484: 338: 685:, a close approximation of its actual pronunciation, or more abstractly as 661:. It is equally possible within a phonemic transcription to use the symbol 363:
American, Canadian, and Australian speakers of English would pronounce the
265:
of words in all languages changes over time. However, their written forms (
134: 1755:
The Indispensable Foundation: A Selection from the Writings of Henry Sweet
902: 208: 1571: 1546: 828: 729: 612: 608: 576: 347: 246: 772:
of a language. For example, if a speaker of variety A pronounces the
387: 1562:
Comparison of ASCII encodings of the International Phonetic Alphabet
1620:
The International Phonetic Alphabet: Its Background and Development
531:
and European languages and is still commonly used by linguists of
1566: 850: 737:, as English spelling would suggest, the words can be transcribed 674: 670: 483: 19:
This article is about phonetic transcription. For other uses, see
580: 560:
characters are borrowed from Eastern European orthographies) or
2005:(4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 100–101. 1899:". Collins English Dictionary. HarperCollins Publishers, 2023. 128: 66: 25: 783:, whereas a speaker of variety B pronounces the lexical set 1630:. LINCOM textbooks in linguistics. Munich: LINCOM Europa. 575:
There are also extended versions of the IPA, for example:
1925:(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 118. 1804:(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 160. 893:
Two examples of this type were developed by the Danish
564:. Examples of this transcription may be seen in Pike's 1655:. London: University College, Department of Phonetics. 503:
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language
239:) is the visual representation of speech sounds (or 207:. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see 611:"". A transcription that specifically denotes only 514:, avoid phonetic transcription and instead employ 1728:Pullum, Geoffrey K.; Ladusaw, William A. (1986). 696:Occasionally a transcription will be enclosed in 1980:. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 128–129. 1120: 221:IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters 1923:Dictionaries: the art and craft of lexicography 1698:(Vol. 6, pp. 3040–3051). Oxford: Pergamon. 633:For example, in some dialects the English word 507:Random House Dictionary of the English Language 568:and in many of the papers reprinted in Joos's 1779:. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. pp. 21–40. 1706:. Oxford University Press. pp. 821–846. 325:Narrow versus broad; phonemic versus phonetic 305:have a more consistent (but still imperfect) 8: 1696:The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 1651:International Phonetic Association. (1949). 511:Webster's Third New International Dictionary 1908: 1829:. Cambridge University Press. p. 550. 1746:Sweet, Henry. (1880–1881). Sound Notation. 60:Learn how and when to remove these messages 2045:. Cambridge University Press. p. 551. 1724:. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 2030:(9th ed.). Heffer. pp. 335–336. 1691:. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.| 700:("| |"). This goes beyond phonology into 673:symbols of a typical keyboard, as in the 182:Learn how and when to remove this message 117:Learn how and when to remove this message 1748:Transactions of the Philological Society 1732:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 868:system, created by Scottish phonetician 827:is not read as "yet". This is done with 677:alphabet. For example, the English word 422:). Thus, on the one hand, phonetically, 159:of all important aspects of the article. 80:This article includes a list of general 1767: 885:is reminiscent of the notation used in 1802:The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language 1172:I = degree of air-stream interruption 155:Please consider expanding the lead to 16:Visual representation of speech sounds 7: 1850:Ball, Martin; Rahilly, Joan (1999). 1662:. Cambridge University Press. 2021. 1515:Pronunciation respelling for English 607:transcription should be enclosed in 522:Pronunciation respelling for English 211:. For the distinction between , 1467:S = of the segment in the syllable 1167:e = subvalvate esophageal stricture 890:this type of notation is uncommon. 595:Aspects of alphabetic transcription 1026:description of stricture (i.e., AP 911:consonant ( in IPA) is notated as 665:, which in IPA usage refers to an 601:International Phonetic Association 321:transcription but an orthography. 86:it lacks sufficient corresponding 14: 1644:Ellis, Alexander J. (1869–1889). 1586:, (Revista de Filología Española) 704:analysis. For example, the words 41:This article has multiple issues. 1852:Phonetics: the Science of Speech 1143:D = direction of the air stream 133: 71: 30: 2028:An Outline of English Phonetics 2003:English Phonetics and Phonology 1557:International Phonetic Alphabet 1019:– manner of controlling (i.e., 820:("! !") or pipes ("| |"). 787:with an as in the lexical set 779:with an as in the lexical set 764:") is sometimes used to mark a 494:International Phonetic Alphabet 251:International Phonetic Alphabet 203:International Phonetic Alphabet 147:may be too short to adequately 49:or discuss these issues on the 1881:Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary 1689:Towards a History of Phonetics 1646:On Early English Pronunciation 1009:– manner of production (i.e., 157:provide an accessible overview 21:Transcription (disambiguation) 1: 1978:Elements of General Phonetics 1775:Shariatmadari, David (2019). 1542:Americanist phonetic notation 1412:a = of articulating movement 1270:a = of articulating movement 615:contrasts may be enclosed in 1618:Albright, Robert W. (1958). 555:. This is often labeled the 1976:Abercrombie, David (1967). 1704:The world's writing systems 1592:to represent sign languages 1552:Cyrillic phonetic alphabets 1420:s = of acoustic impression 1278:s = of acoustic impression 1110:– phonetic function (i.e., 459:Types of notational systems 2081: 1921:Landau, Sidney I. (2001). 1854:. Arnold. pp. 142–3. 1626:Canepari, Luciano (2005). 1500:Orthographic transcription 1444: 1196: 1175:p = partial (continuants) 1123: 18: 1963:Readings in Linguistics 1 1950:. University of Michigan. 1720:Pike, Kenneth L. (1943). 1676:Jespersen, Otto. (1889). 1489:English Phonetic Alphabet 1368:= degree of articulation 1240:= degree of articulation 1132:a = air-stream mechanism 745:. If it is essentially a 570:Readings in Linguistics 1 1965:. University of Chicago. 1596:Uralic Phonetic Alphabet 1464:= function phonetically 1382:v = with cavity friction 1346:= point of articulation 1317:= point of articulation 1218:= point of articulation 1158:= controlling mechanism 549:Uralic Phonetic Alphabet 524:for a generic version.) 357:allophonic transcription 2043:Principles of Phonetics 1827:Principles of Phonetics 1800:Crystal, David (1997). 1433:= shape of articulator 1390:= type of articulation 1339:(Features of stricture) 1310:(Features of stricture) 1291:= shape of articulator 1256:= type of articulation 1211:(Features of stricture) 1129:= productive mechanism 870:Alexander Melville Bell 199:phonetic transcriptions 101:more precise citations. 2026:Jones, Daniel (1967). 1961:Joos, M., ed. (1957). 1946:Pike, Kenneth (1947). 1753:Sweet, Henry. (1971). 1520:Pronunciation spelling 1161:V = valvate stricture 1100:– segment type (i.e., 856: 681:may be transcribed as 489: 410:as a vowel resembling 352:phonetic transcription 343:Phonemic transcription 229:Phonetic transcription 196:This article contains 2001:Roach, Peter (2009). 1730:Phonetic symbol guide 1584:RFE Phonetic Alphabet 1577:IPA chart for English 854: 487: 472:(notations which are 2041:Laver, John (1994). 1825:Laver, John (1994). 1777:Don't Believe a Word 1470:s = syllabic contoid 1409:= relative strength 1267:= relative strength 897:(1889) and American 667:alveolar approximant 628:narrow transcription 335:narrow transcription 311:phonemic orthography 1911:, pp. 111–112. 1399:v = vibratory trill 1302:(Rank of stricture) 1200:(Rank of stricture) 837:⟨jet⟩ 624:broad transcription 553:Caucasian languages 547:(here known as the 331:broad transcription 2063:Phonetic alphabets 1884:. Merriam-Webster. 1685:E. J. A. Henderson 1680:. Marburg: Elwert. 1536:Notational systems 1184:n = resonant nasal 1164:o = oral stricture 857: 603:recommends that a 490: 257:Versus orthography 2012:978-0-521-71740-3 1987:978-0-85224-028-1 1932:978-0-521-78512-9 1811:978-0-521-55050-5 1786:978-1-4746-0843-5 1739:978-0-226-68531-1 1713:978-0-19-507993-7 1669:978-0-521-65236-0 1637:978-3-89586-480-3 1505:Phonetic spelling 1480: 1479: 1450:= segmental type 1178:v = nonfrictional 887:chemical formulas 872:(Ellis 1869:15). 818:exclamation marks 760:A double slash (" 749:, these would be 406:) and the second 237:phonetic notation 192: 191: 184: 174: 173: 127: 126: 119: 64: 2070: 2047: 2046: 2038: 2032: 2031: 2023: 2017: 2016: 1998: 1992: 1991: 1973: 1967: 1966: 1958: 1952: 1951: 1943: 1937: 1936: 1918: 1912: 1909:Abercrombie 1967 1906: 1900: 1893: 1887: 1885: 1872: 1866: 1865: 1847: 1841: 1840: 1822: 1816: 1815: 1797: 1791: 1790: 1772: 1743: 1717: 1673: 1641: 1138:l = for lung air 1121: 838: 815: 811: 808: 804: 801: 797: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 763: 756: 755:|bɛdz| 752: 751:|pɛtz| 744: 743:|bɛds| 740: 739:|pɛts| 727: 723: 719: 715: 692: 688: 684: 664: 652: 648: 585:Luciano Canepari 446: 417: 409: 404:t-glottalization 397: 385: 382:and the initial 381: 366: 218: 214: 187: 180: 169: 166: 160: 137: 129: 122: 115: 111: 108: 102: 97:this article by 88:inline citations 75: 74: 67: 56: 34: 33: 26: 2080: 2079: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2040: 2039: 2035: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2013: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1988: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1933: 1920: 1919: 1915: 1907: 1903: 1894: 1890: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1862: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1837: 1824: 1823: 1819: 1812: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1787: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1764: 1740: 1727: 1714: 1701: 1670: 1658: 1638: 1625: 1615: 1590:Stokoe notation 1538: 1530:Transliteration 1485: 1360:g = vocal folds 878: 849: 841:transliteration 836: 806: 799: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 609:square brackets 597: 529:Native American 482: 461: 327: 259: 233:phonetic script 231:(also known as 226: 225: 224: 188: 177: 176: 175: 170: 164: 161: 154: 142:This article's 138: 123: 112: 106: 103: 93:Please help to 92: 76: 72: 35: 31: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2078: 2077: 2074: 2066: 2065: 2055: 2054: 2049: 2048: 2033: 2018: 2011: 1993: 1986: 1968: 1953: 1938: 1931: 1913: 1901: 1888: 1867: 1860: 1842: 1835: 1817: 1810: 1792: 1785: 1766: 1765: 1763: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1751: 1744: 1738: 1725: 1718: 1712: 1699: 1692: 1681: 1674: 1668: 1656: 1649: 1642: 1636: 1623: 1614: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1604: 1602:Visible Speech 1599: 1593: 1587: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1554: 1549: 1544: 1537: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1527: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1507: 1502: 1497: 1491: 1484: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456:p = perceptual 1454: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1393:i = iterative 1385: 1384: 1383: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1357:= articulator 1352: 1351: 1350: 1341: 1336: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1328:= articulator 1323: 1322: 1321: 1312: 1306:S = secondary 1304: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232:t = tongue tip 1229:= articulator 1224: 1223: 1222: 1213: 1205: 1202: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1179: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1165: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1135:I = initiator 1116: 1115: 1105: 1095: 1024: 1014: 1000: 999: 909:alveolar nasal 895:Otto Jespersen 877: 874: 866:Visible Speech 855:Visible Speech 848: 845: 829:angle brackets 596: 593: 481: 478: 460: 457: 420:L-vocalization 326: 323: 258: 255: 245:) by means of 219:⟩, see 195: 194: 193: 190: 189: 172: 171: 151:the key points 141: 139: 132: 125: 124: 79: 77: 70: 65: 39: 38: 36: 29: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2076: 2075: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2058: 2044: 2037: 2034: 2029: 2022: 2019: 2014: 2008: 2004: 1997: 1994: 1989: 1983: 1979: 1972: 1969: 1964: 1957: 1954: 1949: 1942: 1939: 1934: 1928: 1924: 1917: 1914: 1910: 1905: 1902: 1898: 1892: 1889: 1883: 1882: 1877: 1871: 1868: 1863: 1861:0-340-70010-6 1857: 1853: 1846: 1843: 1838: 1836:0-521-45655-X 1832: 1828: 1821: 1818: 1813: 1807: 1803: 1796: 1793: 1788: 1782: 1778: 1771: 1768: 1761: 1756: 1752: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1735: 1731: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1697: 1693: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1654: 1650: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1633: 1629: 1624: 1621: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1605: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1594: 1591: 1588: 1585: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1573: 1570: 1568: 1565: 1563: 1560: 1559: 1558: 1555: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1543: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1528: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1518: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1495: 1492: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1469: 1468: 1466: 1465: 1463: 1460: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1449: 1446: 1445: 1435: 1434: 1432: 1429: 1422: 1421: 1419: 1414: 1413: 1411: 1410: 1408: 1405: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1392: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1381: 1378: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1369: 1367: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1348: 1347: 1345: 1342: 1340: 1337: 1335: 1330: 1329: 1327: 1324: 1319: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1293: 1292: 1290: 1287: 1280: 1279: 1277: 1272: 1271: 1269: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1258: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1245: 1244: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1228: 1225: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1183: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1174: 1173: 1171: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1160: 1159: 1157: 1154: 1146:e = egressive 1145: 1144: 1142: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1133: 1131: 1130: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1122: 1119: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1003: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 914: 913: 912: 910: 907: 904: 900: 896: 891: 888: 883: 875: 873: 871: 867: 862: 853: 846: 844: 842: 834: 830: 826: 821: 819: 775: 771: 767: 758: 748: 736: 731: 728:are separate 711: 707: 703: 702:morphological 699: 694: 680: 676: 672: 668: 660: 654: 644: 639: 636: 631: 629: 625: 620: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 594: 592: 590: 586: 582: 578: 573: 571: 567: 563: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 525: 523: 519: 518: 513: 512: 508: 504: 499: 495: 486: 479: 477: 475: 471: 467: 458: 456: 453: 448: 442: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 415: 405: 401: 395: 389: 379: 374: 370: 360: 358: 353: 349: 344: 340: 336: 332: 324: 322: 318: 314: 312: 308: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 263:pronunciation 256: 254: 252: 248: 244: 243: 238: 234: 230: 222: 210: 206: 204: 200: 186: 183: 168: 165:December 2019 158: 152: 150: 145: 140: 136: 131: 130: 121: 118: 110: 100: 96: 90: 89: 83: 78: 69: 68: 63: 61: 54: 53: 48: 47: 42: 37: 28: 27: 22: 2042: 2036: 2027: 2021: 2002: 1996: 1977: 1971: 1962: 1956: 1947: 1941: 1922: 1916: 1904: 1891: 1879: 1870: 1851: 1845: 1826: 1820: 1801: 1795: 1776: 1770: 1754: 1747: 1729: 1721: 1703: 1695: 1688: 1677: 1659: 1652: 1645: 1627: 1619: 1613:Bibliography 1525:Romanization 1461: 1447: 1430: 1406: 1387: 1371:t = in time 1365: 1354: 1343: 1338: 1325: 1314: 1309: 1301: 1288: 1264: 1253: 1243:t = in time 1237: 1226: 1221:a = alveolar 1215: 1210: 1207:P = primary 1199: 1155: 1126: 1117: 1111: 1107: 1101: 1097: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1020: 1016: 1010: 1006: 1001: 995: 991: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 923: 919: 915: 899:Kenneth Pike 892: 882:analphabetic 881: 879: 876:Analphabetic 860: 858: 832: 824: 822: 812:, where the 759: 746: 734: 709: 705: 695: 678: 655: 642: 640: 634: 632: 627: 623: 621: 598: 588: 574: 569: 565: 526: 515: 501: 491: 473: 470:Analphabetic 469: 465: 462: 449: 440: 435: 430:tends to be 427: 423: 400:glottal stop 368: 367:in the word 361: 356: 351: 342: 334: 330: 328: 319: 315: 307:relationship 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 260: 240: 236: 232: 228: 227: 215:and ⟨ 198: 197: 178: 162: 146: 144:lead section 113: 104: 85: 57: 50: 44: 43:Please help 40: 1607:Teuthonista 1494:Eye dialect 1349:g = glottal 774:lexical set 766:diaphonemic 651:/ˈprɛts.əl/ 647:/ˈprɛts.l̩/ 557:Americanist 267:orthography 99:introducing 1762:References 1750:, 177–235. 1423:n = normal 1415:n = normal 1281:n = normal 1273:n = normal 1259:n = normal 1181:n = nasal 922:VoeIpvnnAP 770:diasystems 720:. Because 517:respelling 480:Alphabetic 466:Alphabetic 452:diacritics 339:allophones 82:references 46:improve it 1948:Phonemics 1510:Phonetics 1396:t = trill 1331:v = velic 1320:v = velic 1023:VoeIpvnn) 645:could be 566:Phonemics 149:summarize 107:June 2018 52:talk page 2057:Category 1876:"little" 1687:(Eds.), 1483:See also 1453:r = real 1436:f = flat 1379:w = wide 1374:l = long 1294:f = flat 1246:l = long 1204:A = acme 903:syllabic 833:chevrons 730:phonemes 683:/tʃɝːtʃ/ 613:phonemic 605:phonetic 562:digraphs 445:/ˈlɪtᵊl/ 348:phonemes 213:/ / 209:Help:IPA 1572:X-SAMPA 1547:ARPABET 1046:ansnsfS 942:ansnsfS 643:pretzel 635:pretzel 617:slashes 577:Ext-IPA 541:Semitic 498:history 303:Italian 299:Spanish 295:through 275:Tibetan 271:English 247:symbols 201:in the 95:improve 2009:  1984:  1929:  1897:Little 1858:  1833:  1808:  1783:  1736:  1710:  1666:  1634:  1013:aIlDe) 906:voiced 861:iconic 847:Iconic 805:, and 803:⫽træp⫽ 796:⫽pɑːm⫽ 718:/bɛdz/ 714:/pɛts/ 679:church 583:, and 551:) and 545:Uralic 533:Slavic 441:little 436:little 432:higher 428:little 424:little 402:; see 388:dark L 369:little 291:though 242:phones 217:  84:, but 1598:(UPA) 1567:SAMPA 918:aIlDe 810:⫽baθ⫽ 698:pipes 691:/crc/ 687:/crc/ 675:SAMPA 671:ASCII 659:trill 537:Indic 416:] 412:[ 396:] 392:[ 386:as a 380:] 376:[ 371:as a 287:cough 283:tough 279:bough 205:(IPA) 2007:ISBN 1982:ISBN 1927:ISBN 1856:ISBN 1831:ISBN 1806:ISBN 1781:ISBN 1734:ISBN 1708:ISBN 1664:ISBN 1632:ISBN 1090:ansn 1082:tlwv 1066:anss 986:ansn 978:tlwv 962:anss 807:BATH 800:TRAP 793:PALM 789:TRAP 785:BATH 781:PALM 777:BATH 753:and 741:and 724:and 716:and 710:beds 708:and 706:pets 599:The 581:VoQS 492:The 333:and 301:and 293:and 273:and 261:The 1114:Ss) 1104:rp) 1086:itv 1058:tlv 982:itv 954:tlv 859:In 831:or 825:jet 814:⫽a⫽ 726:/z/ 722:/s/ 663:/ɹ/ 649:or 589:IPA 587:'s 488:IPA 474:not 443:is 408:/l/ 398:(a 384:/l/ 373:tap 365:/t/ 313:). 235:or 2059:: 1878:. 1094:f) 1070:fT 1038:tl 998:Ss 994:rp 966:fT 934:tl 843:. 835:: 798:, 762:⫽⫽ 757:. 693:. 591:. 579:, 543:, 539:, 535:, 509:, 505:, 359:. 289:, 285:, 281:, 253:. 55:. 2015:. 1990:. 1935:. 1895:" 1886:. 1864:. 1839:. 1814:. 1789:. 1742:. 1716:. 1672:. 1640:. 1462:F 1448:S 1431:s 1407:r 1388:t 1366:d 1355:a 1344:p 1326:a 1315:p 1289:s 1265:r 1254:t 1238:d 1227:a 1216:p 1156:C 1127:M 1112:F 1108:F 1102:S 1098:S 1092:s 1088:r 1084:t 1080:d 1078:g 1076:a 1074:g 1072:p 1068:s 1064:r 1062:n 1060:t 1056:d 1054:v 1052:a 1050:v 1048:p 1044:r 1042:n 1040:t 1036:d 1034:t 1032:a 1030:a 1028:p 1021:C 1017:C 1011:M 1007:M 996:F 992:S 990:f 988:s 984:r 980:t 976:d 974:g 972:a 970:g 968:p 964:s 960:r 958:n 956:t 952:d 950:v 948:a 946:v 944:p 940:r 938:n 936:t 932:d 930:t 928:a 926:a 924:p 920:C 916:M 747:z 735:s 418:( 414:o 394:ʔ 378:ɾ 346:( 223:. 185:) 179:( 167:) 163:( 153:. 120:) 114:( 109:) 105:( 91:. 62:) 58:( 23:.

Index

Transcription (disambiguation)
improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages
references
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message

lead section
summarize
provide an accessible overview
Learn how and when to remove this message
phonetic transcriptions
International Phonetic Alphabet
Help:IPA
IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters
phones
symbols
International Phonetic Alphabet
pronunciation
orthography
English
Tibetan
Spanish
Italian
relationship
phonemic orthography
allophones

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.