Knowledge (XXG)

Physics envy

Source 📝

81:, is generally considered remarkable and often disproportionate compared to other areas of inquiry. "Physics envy" refers to the envy (perceived or real) of scholars in other disciplines for the mathematical precision of fundamental concepts obtained by physicists. It is an accusation raised against disciplines (typically against 151:'s strategy structure model. This framework holds that a firm must evaluate the environment in order to set up its structure that will implement strategies. Chandler also maintained that there is close connection "between mathematics, physics, and engineering graduates and the systemizing of the business strategy paradigm". 367:
said "To those who do not know mathematics it is difficult to get across a real feeling as to the beauty, the deepest beauty, of nature ... If you want to learn about nature, to appreciate nature, it is necessary to understand the language that she speaks
712:
Andrew Lo (MIT Sloan School) and Mark Mueller (MIT Sloan School and MIT Center for Theoretical Physics), "Warning: Physics Envy May be Hazardous to Your Wealth!" published in the Journal of Investment Management, Volume 8, Number 2, Second Quarter 2010
158:, physics envy arises in cases of projects that lack interaction with each other, using only one idea due to the manner by which new hypotheses are tested and discarded in the pursuit of one true intelligence. 114:
discusses the ability and desirability of reduction to its mathematical basis in his article "Mysteries of Nature: How Deeply Hidden." Chomsky contributed extensively to the development of the field of
363:
remarked "The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve.", while
202: 736: 662: 579: 556: 531: 318: 93:) when these academic areas try to express their fundamental concepts in terms of mathematics, which is seen as an unwarranted push for 635: 602: 474: 441: 405: 731: 77: 678: 335: 223: 594: 571: 654: 522:
Chomsky, Noam (2010). "1. The Mysteries of Nature: How Deeply Hidden?". In Jean Bricmont; Julie Franck (eds.).
285: 155: 116: 36: 692: 148: 623: 500: 192: 187: 182: 714: 144: 100: 258: 132: 47:. The term argues that writing and working practices in these disciplines have overused confusing 627: 614: 466: 658: 631: 598: 575: 552: 548: 527: 470: 437: 433: 401: 314: 308: 280: 251: 106:
discusses the issue of the inability to reduce biology to its mathematical basis in his book
509: 495: 458: 425: 364: 140: 82: 56: 23:
is used to criticize modern writing and research of academics working in areas such as "
704: 700: 686: 647: 228: 120: 44: 725: 459: 426: 360: 24: 568:
What Makes Biology Unique? Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline
197: 177: 111: 94: 72: 398:
Rationality and Cultural Interpretivism: A Critical Assessment of Failed Solutions
52: 32: 136: 103: 90: 40: 28: 513: 172: 167: 86: 143:
so it can be applied to the social sciences. The phenomenon also exists in
649:
Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method
71:
The success of physics in "mathematicizing" itself, particularly since
60: 48: 710: 682: 545:
Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life
51:
and complicated mathematics to seem more 'rigorous' as in heavily
135:, which has been associated with physics envy. For instance, 428:
Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship
465:. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. pp.  131:
The Social Sciences have been accused of possessing an
589:
Mirowski, P. (1999). "The Ironies of Physics Envy".
543:
Csikszent, M.; Hektner, J.M.; Schmidt, J.A. (2006).
432:. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. pp.  646: 613: 336:"Academic B.S. as artificial barriers to entry" 252:"Physics envy in psychology: A cautionary tale" 496:"The Mysteries of Nature: How Deeply Hidden?" 222:Clarke, Kevin; Primo, David (31 March 2012). 8: 400:. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. p. 126. 693:Physics Envy: "quants" and financial models 279:Bennis, Warren; O'Toole, James (May 2005). 203:Unreasonable ineffectiveness of mathematics 457:Goertzel, Ben; Pennachin, Cassio (2007). 424:Neergaard, Helle; Ulhøi, John P. (2007). 313:. Faber & Faber. pp. 214–231. 214: 340:Economics, neologisms, and distraction 147:research as demonstrated by historian 139:scientists accept a mistaken image of 419: 417: 281:"How Business Schools Lost Their Way" 7: 615:"What's So Wrong with Physics Envy?" 14: 737:Sociology of scientific knowledge 645:Schram, S.; Caterino, B. (2006). 37:business administration education 334:Smith, Noah (12 December 2015). 461:Artificial General Intelligence 1: 685:by two political scientists. 526:. Columbia University Press. 307:Robin Dunbar (7 April 2011). 156:artificial intelligence (AI) 695:, essay and book review of 224:"Overcoming 'Physics Envy'" 753: 689:, published March 30, 2012 620:Non-Natural Social Science 618:. In de Marchi, N. (ed.). 595:Cambridge University Press 572:Cambridge University Press 108:What Makes Biology Unique? 679:Overcoming ‘Physics Envy’ 655:New York University Press 707:, WSJ, December 14, 2011 310:The Trouble with Science 514:10.5840/jphil2009106416 286:Harvard Business Review 117:theoretical linguistics 101:Evolutionary biologist 732:Philosophy of science 697:Models Behaving Badly 624:Duke University Press 501:Journal of Philosophy 396:Yoshida, Kei (2014). 193:Philosophy of science 188:Philosophy of physics 183:Philosophy of biology 78:Principia Mathematica 612:Schabas, M. (1993). 591:More Heat Than Light 494:Chomsky, N. (2009). 259:New York University 149:Alfred Chandler Jr. 133:inferiority complex 16:English expression 664:978-0-8147-4033-0 581:978-0-521-84114-6 566:Mayr, E. (2004). 558:978-1-4129-4923-1 549:SAGE Publications 533:978-0-231-14475-9 320:978-0-571-26519-0 145:business strategy 744: 668: 652: 641: 617: 608: 585: 562: 537: 524:Chomsky Notebook 517: 481: 480: 464: 454: 448: 447: 431: 421: 412: 411: 393: 387: 384: 378: 375: 369: 357: 351: 350: 348: 346: 331: 325: 324: 304: 298: 297: 295: 293: 276: 270: 269: 267: 265: 256: 247: 241: 240: 238: 236: 219: 154:In the field of 752: 751: 747: 746: 745: 743: 742: 741: 722: 721: 719: 675: 665: 644: 638: 611: 605: 588: 582: 565: 559: 542: 534: 521: 493: 490: 485: 484: 477: 456: 455: 451: 444: 423: 422: 415: 408: 395: 394: 390: 385: 381: 376: 372: 365:Richard Feynman 358: 354: 344: 342: 333: 332: 328: 321: 306: 305: 301: 291: 289: 278: 277: 273: 263: 261: 254: 249: 248: 244: 234: 232: 221: 220: 216: 211: 164: 141:natural science 129: 83:social sciences 69: 57:natural science 45:social sciences 25:softer sciences 17: 12: 11: 5: 750: 748: 740: 739: 734: 724: 723: 717: 716: 708: 705:Burton Malkiel 701:Emanuel Derman 690: 687:New York Times 674: 673:External links 671: 670: 669: 663: 642: 636: 609: 603: 586: 580: 563: 557: 540: 539: 538: 532: 508:(4): 167–200. 489: 486: 483: 482: 475: 449: 442: 413: 406: 388: 386:Chomsky (2009) 379: 370: 352: 326: 319: 299: 271: 242: 229:New York Times 213: 212: 210: 207: 206: 205: 200: 195: 190: 185: 180: 175: 170: 163: 160: 128: 125: 121:formal science 68: 65: 59:subjects like 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 749: 738: 735: 733: 730: 729: 727: 720: 715: 711: 709: 706: 702: 698: 694: 691: 688: 684: 680: 677: 676: 672: 666: 660: 656: 651: 650: 643: 639: 637:0-8223-1410-X 633: 629: 625: 621: 616: 610: 606: 604:0-521-42689-8 600: 596: 592: 587: 583: 577: 573: 569: 564: 560: 554: 550: 546: 541: 535: 529: 525: 520:Collected in 519: 518: 515: 511: 507: 503: 502: 497: 492: 491: 487: 478: 476:9783540237334 472: 468: 463: 462: 453: 450: 445: 443:9781843768357 439: 435: 430: 429: 420: 418: 414: 409: 407:9780739173992 403: 399: 392: 389: 383: 380: 374: 371: 366: 362: 361:Eugene Wigner 359:For example, 356: 353: 341: 337: 330: 327: 322: 316: 312: 311: 303: 300: 288: 287: 282: 275: 272: 260: 253: 250:Sokal, Alan. 246: 243: 231: 230: 225: 218: 215: 208: 204: 201: 199: 196: 194: 191: 189: 186: 184: 181: 179: 176: 174: 171: 169: 166: 165: 161: 159: 157: 152: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 126: 124: 122: 118: 113: 109: 105: 102: 98: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 79: 74: 66: 64: 62: 58: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 22: 718: 703:. Review by 696: 648: 619: 590: 567: 544: 523: 505: 499: 460: 452: 427: 397: 391: 382: 373: 355: 343:. Retrieved 339: 329: 309: 302: 290:. Retrieved 284: 274: 262:. Retrieved 245: 233:. Retrieved 227: 217: 198:Reductionism 178:Newtonianism 153: 130: 112:Noam Chomsky 107: 99: 95:reductionism 76: 73:Isaac Newton 70: 33:liberal arts 21:physics envy 20: 18: 377:Mayr (2004) 53:mathematics 726:Categories 626:. p.  488:References 137:positivist 104:Ernst Mayr 91:psychology 67:Background 41:humanities 29:philosophy 345:10 August 292:10 August 264:10 August 235:10 August 173:Academese 168:Scientism 87:economics 19:The term 162:See also 127:Examples 85:such as 61:physics 55:-based 661:  634:  601:  578:  555:  530:  473:  440:  404:  317:  49:jargon 43:, and 683:op-ed 436:–38. 255:(PDF) 209:Notes 659:ISBN 632:ISBN 599:ISBN 576:ISBN 553:ISBN 528:ISBN 471:ISBN 467:2007 438:ISBN 402:ISBN 368:in." 347:2016 315:ISBN 294:2016 266:2016 237:2016 119:, a 89:and 699:by 510:doi 506:106 75:'s 27:", 728:: 681:, 657:. 653:. 630:. 628:45 622:. 597:. 593:. 574:. 570:. 551:. 547:. 504:. 498:. 469:. 434:37 416:^ 338:. 283:. 257:. 226:. 123:. 110:. 97:. 63:. 39:, 35:, 31:, 667:. 640:. 607:. 584:. 561:. 536:. 516:. 512:: 479:. 446:. 410:. 349:. 323:. 296:. 268:. 239:.

Index

softer sciences
philosophy
liberal arts
business administration education
humanities
social sciences
jargon
mathematics
natural science
physics
Isaac Newton
Principia Mathematica
social sciences
economics
psychology
reductionism
Evolutionary biologist
Ernst Mayr
Noam Chomsky
theoretical linguistics
formal science
inferiority complex
positivist
natural science
business strategy
Alfred Chandler Jr.
artificial intelligence (AI)
Scientism
Academese
Newtonianism

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.