Knowledge (XXG)

Pittman–Robertson Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act

Source 📝

84:
Interior. Acceptable options include research, surveys, management of wildlife and/or habitat, and acquisition or lease of land. Once a plan has been approved, the state must pay the full cost and is later reimbursed for up to 75% of that cost through the funds generated by the Pittman–Robertson Act. The 25% of the cost that the state must pay generally comes from its hunting license sales. If, for whatever reason, any of the federal money does not get spent, after two years that money is then reallocated to the
214:; (2) authorize a state to elect to allocate 10% of a specified amount apportioned to it from the Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration fund for such costs; (3) limit the federal share of such costs under such Act to 90%; and (4) require amounts provided for such costs under such Act to remain available for expenditure and obligation for five fiscal years. The bill passed the House of Representatives on February 5, 2014. 189:
board member and sportsman, introduced the Wildlife and Sports Fish Restoration Programs Improvement Act. The act passed the House 423–2 and became law on November 1, 2000, and defines in what manner the money can be spent. In particular, it earmarked funds to be spent on hunter education programmes,
165:
The Pittman–Robertson Act was so successful that in the 1950s, a similar act was written for the protection of fish species. This act was titled the Federal Aid in Sports Fish Restoration Act. As with its wildlife counterpart, the name of this act is generally shortened by reducing it to the names of
83:
States must fulfill certain requirements to use the money apportioned to them. None of the money from their hunting license sales may be used by anyone other than the states' own fish and game departments. Plans for what to do with the money must be submitted to and approved by the Secretary of the
39:
on September 2, 1937, and became effective on July 1 of the following year. It has been amended many times, with several of the major amendments taking place during the 1970s and the most recent in 2000. Prior to the creation of the Pittman–Robertson Act, many species of wildlife were driven to or
136:
The idea behind the act is that by creating more and better hunting experiences for people through habitat management and hunter education, more taxable items will be purchased, which would in turn provide more funding for management and improvement. The habitat improvement may also stimulate the
91:
In the 1970s, amendments to the act created a 10% tax on handguns and their ammunition and accessories as well as an 11% tax on archery equipment. It was also mandated that half of the money from each of the new taxes be used to educate and train hunters by the creation and maintenance of hunter
127:
Critics of the legislation claim that state Fish and Wildlife agencies allocate funds primarily towards the creation of new hunting opportunities. There is a feeling among hunters, in general, that the tax money collected from firearms purchases should benefit hunters rather than wildlife
144:
One source shows hunters spending around $ 10 billion a year on everything they need for their hunting trips. A different source found that hunters spend between $ 2.8 and $ 5.2 billion a year on taxable merchandise. This generates between $ 177 and $ 324 million a year in P–R money.
207: 210:. Title II of that bill, the Target Practice and Marksmanship Training Support Act, would amend the Pittman–Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act to: (1) authorize a state to pay up to 90% of the costs of acquiring land for, expanding, or constructing a public 104:
web page that was updated in January 2010, over two billion dollars of federal aid has been generated through the program, which in turn means that states have maintained their 25% contributions with over 500 million dollars.
80:
to distribute to the states. The Secretary determines how much to give to each state based on a formula that takes into account both the area of the state and its number of licensed hunters.
120:, to expand their ranges beyond their normal boundaries prior to the implementation of the act. Important game populations such as white-tailed deer and several species of the avian order 717: 148:
Another source estimated that hunters contribute about $ 3.5 million a day to conservation by purchasing taxable items and hunting licenses. One study showed an extremely high
712: 707: 52:
that provides funds to each state to manage such animals and their habitats. Notable species that have come back from the brink since the implementation of this act include
32:, is an act that imposes an 11% tax on firearms, ammunition, and archery equipment and distributes the proceeds to state governments for wildlife projects. 73: 624: 77: 100:
This piece of legislation has provided states with funding for research and projects that would otherwise have been unaffordable. According to a
186: 601: 369: 85: 101: 702: 722: 108:
The habitat acquisition and improvement made possible by this money has allowed some species with large ranges, such as
572:"Federal Hunting and Fishing Excise Taxes Create Enormous 1,000–2,000% Annual Return on Investment to Outdoor Industry" 449:"Federal Hunting and Fishing Excise Taxes Create Enormous 1,000–2,000% Annual Return on Investment to Outdoor Industry" 72:
The Pittman–Robertson Act took over a preexisting 11% excise tax on firearms and ammunition. Instead of going into the
519: 231: 29: 167: 178:
In 2000, alleging that the Pittman-Robertson Act sportsman's conservation trust funds were being mismanaged,
141:
sector of the economy by creating jobs in areas where people tend to visit for hunting or aesthetic reasons.
674: 489: 36: 149: 179: 109: 45: 270: 593: 652: 128:
conservation programs, given that it is the hunters who pay the tax and establish the funding.
53: 373: 340: 208:
Sportsmen’s Heritage And Recreational Enhancement Act of 2013 (H.R. 3590; 113th Congress)
427:"United States Code Annotated. Title 16. Conservation. Chapter 5B. Wildlife Restoration" 426: 211: 271:"Federal Aid Division – The Pittman–Robertson Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act" 696: 490:"Financial Returns to Industry from the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Program" 203: 76:
as it had done in the past, the money generated by the tax is instead given to the
301: 121: 57: 25: 372:. National Rifle Association – Institute for Legislative Action. Archived from 138: 49: 41: 199: 182: 61: 571: 448: 190:
the construction of shooting ranges and sport fish restoration projects.
117: 166:
those who sponsored it, and so it is generally referred to as the
152:
for firearm manufacturers: 823% to 1588% depending on the year.
124:
have also had a chance to recover and expand their populations.
343:. Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection 113: 232:"Did You Know that Gun Sales Fund State Wildlife Programs?" 495:. Andrew Loftus Consulting & Southwick Associates, Inc 370:"Pittman–Robertson Act: Friend Of The Hunter & Hunted" 625:"Tuesday: Firearms in the House, farm bill in the Senate" 302:"Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration (Pittman–Robertson)" 421: 419: 417: 415: 413: 411: 273:. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Southeast Region 560:. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. pp. Chapter 22. 404:. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. pp. Chapter 2. 718:United States federal environmental legislation 18:Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act of 1937 594:"Summary: S.2609 — 106th Congress (1999-2000)" 335: 333: 331: 329: 327: 325: 323: 321: 319: 44:by commercial/market hunting pressure and/or 8: 304:. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 296: 294: 292: 290: 288: 92:safety classes and shooting/target ranges. 713:United States federal taxation legislation 708:United States federal firearms legislation 647: 645: 198:On November 21, 2013, U.S. Representative 551: 549: 547: 545: 543: 541: 539: 537: 514: 512: 510: 364: 362: 360: 358: 265: 263: 261: 341:"Federal Funding for Rish and Wildlife" 259: 257: 255: 253: 251: 249: 247: 245: 243: 241: 223: 395: 393: 391: 623:Kasperowicz, Pete (4 February 2014). 604:from the original on December 4, 2020 600:. Library of Congress. May 23, 2000. 484: 482: 480: 478: 476: 474: 472: 470: 468: 466: 187:National Rifle Association of America 7: 429:. Animal Legal and Historical Center 14: 24:for its sponsors, Nevada Senator 48:from humans. The act created an 20:, most often referred to as the 558:Wildlife Ecology and Management 402:Wildlife Ecology and Management 86:Migratory Bird Conservation Act 574:. Buckeye Firearms Association 451:. Buckeye Firearms Association 102:U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1: 739: 675:"H.R. 3590 - All Actions" 520:"Pittman Robertson Funds" 78:Secretary of the Interior 28:and Virginia Congressman 677:. United States Congress 655:. United States Congress 202:(R, OH-5) introduced an 30:Absalom Willis Robertson 35:The act was signed by 653:"H.R. 3590 - Summary" 174:Legislative oversight 37:Franklin D. Roosevelt 22:Pittman–Robertson Act 703:1937 in American law 556:Bolen, Eric (2003). 400:Bolen, Eric (2003). 150:return on investment 110:American black bears 723:Hunting legislation 194:Proposed amendments 180:U.S. Representative 168:Dingell–Johnson Act 161:Similar legislation 156:Related legislation 46:habitat degradation 54:white-tailed deer 730: 687: 686: 684: 682: 671: 665: 664: 662: 660: 649: 640: 639: 637: 635: 620: 614: 613: 611: 609: 590: 584: 583: 581: 579: 568: 562: 561: 553: 532: 531: 529: 527: 516: 505: 504: 502: 500: 494: 486: 461: 460: 458: 456: 445: 439: 438: 436: 434: 423: 406: 405: 397: 386: 385: 383: 381: 366: 353: 352: 350: 348: 337: 314: 313: 311: 309: 298: 283: 282: 280: 278: 267: 236: 235: 234:. 11 April 2018. 228: 738: 737: 733: 732: 731: 729: 728: 727: 693: 692: 691: 690: 680: 678: 673: 672: 668: 658: 656: 651: 650: 643: 633: 631: 622: 621: 617: 607: 605: 592: 591: 587: 577: 575: 570: 569: 565: 555: 554: 535: 525: 523: 522:. Texas Archery 518: 517: 508: 498: 496: 492: 488: 487: 464: 454: 452: 447: 446: 442: 432: 430: 425: 424: 409: 399: 398: 389: 379: 377: 368: 367: 356: 346: 344: 339: 338: 317: 307: 305: 300: 299: 286: 276: 274: 269: 268: 239: 230: 229: 225: 220: 200:Robert E. Latta 196: 176: 163: 158: 134: 98: 70: 12: 11: 5: 736: 734: 726: 725: 720: 715: 710: 705: 695: 694: 689: 688: 666: 641: 615: 585: 563: 533: 506: 462: 440: 407: 387: 376:on 2 June 2013 354: 315: 284: 237: 222: 221: 219: 216: 195: 192: 185:(R-Alaska), a 175: 172: 162: 159: 157: 154: 133: 130: 97: 94: 69: 66: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 735: 724: 721: 719: 716: 714: 711: 709: 706: 704: 701: 700: 698: 676: 670: 667: 654: 648: 646: 642: 630: 626: 619: 616: 603: 599: 595: 589: 586: 573: 567: 564: 559: 552: 550: 548: 546: 544: 542: 540: 538: 534: 521: 515: 513: 511: 507: 491: 485: 483: 481: 479: 477: 475: 473: 471: 469: 467: 463: 450: 444: 441: 428: 422: 420: 418: 416: 414: 412: 408: 403: 396: 394: 392: 388: 375: 371: 365: 363: 361: 359: 355: 342: 336: 334: 332: 330: 328: 326: 324: 322: 320: 316: 303: 297: 295: 293: 291: 289: 285: 272: 266: 264: 262: 260: 258: 256: 254: 252: 250: 248: 246: 244: 242: 238: 233: 227: 224: 217: 215: 213: 209: 205: 201: 193: 191: 188: 184: 181: 173: 171: 169: 160: 155: 153: 151: 146: 142: 140: 131: 129: 125: 123: 119: 115: 111: 106: 103: 95: 93: 89: 87: 81: 79: 75: 74:U.S. Treasury 67: 65: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 38: 33: 31: 27: 23: 19: 679:. Retrieved 669: 657:. Retrieved 632:. Retrieved 628: 618: 606:. Retrieved 598:Congress.gov 597: 588: 576:. Retrieved 566: 557: 524:. Retrieved 497:. Retrieved 453:. Retrieved 443: 431:. Retrieved 401: 378:. Retrieved 374:the original 345:. Retrieved 306:. Retrieved 275:. Retrieved 226: 212:target range 204:omnibus bill 197: 177: 164: 147: 143: 135: 126: 107: 99: 90: 82: 71: 58:wild turkeys 34: 21: 17: 15: 206:called the 122:Galliformes 26:Key Pittman 697:Categories 681:6 February 659:5 February 634:6 February 578:1 December 526:1 December 455:1 December 433:2 December 380:1 December 347:1 December 308:1 December 277:1 December 218:References 139:ecotourism 62:wood ducks 50:excise tax 42:extinction 499:6 October 183:Don Young 170:, or DJ. 132:Economics 629:The Hill 602:Archived 68:Overview 118:cougars 96:Results 608:16 May 116:, and 60:, and 493:(PDF) 40:near 683:2014 661:2014 636:2014 610:2023 580:2011 528:2011 501:2015 457:2011 435:2011 382:2011 349:2011 310:2011 279:2011 16:The 114:elk 699:: 644:^ 627:. 596:. 536:^ 509:^ 465:^ 410:^ 390:^ 357:^ 318:^ 287:^ 240:^ 112:, 88:. 64:. 56:, 685:. 663:. 638:. 612:. 582:. 530:. 503:. 459:. 437:. 384:. 351:. 312:. 281:.

Index

Key Pittman
Absalom Willis Robertson
Franklin D. Roosevelt
extinction
habitat degradation
excise tax
white-tailed deer
wild turkeys
wood ducks
U.S. Treasury
Secretary of the Interior
Migratory Bird Conservation Act
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
American black bears
elk
cougars
Galliformes
ecotourism
return on investment
Dingell–Johnson Act
U.S. Representative
Don Young
National Rifle Association of America
Robert E. Latta
omnibus bill
Sportsmen’s Heritage And Recreational Enhancement Act of 2013 (H.R. 3590; 113th Congress)
target range
"Did You Know that Gun Sales Fund State Wildlife Programs?"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.