263:
prejudice to the other side's right to bring the claims in another action or another court. A peremptory plea had only one kind: a plea in bar. A party making a plea in bar could either traverse the other side's pleading (i.e., deny all or some of the facts pleaded) or confess and avoid it (i.e., admit the facts pleaded but plead new ones that would dispel their effect). A traverse could be general (deny everything) or specific. Either side could plead imparlance in order to get more time to plead on the merits. Once the case was at issue, the defendant could reopen the pleadings in order to plead a newly discovered defense (and start the whole sequence again) by filing a plea puis darrein.
160:) which objects to the legal sufficiency of the opponent's pleading (usually a complaint) and demands that the court rule immediately about whether the pleading is legally adequate before the party must plead on the merits in response. Since the demurrer procedure required an immediate ruling as does a motion, many common law jurisdictions therefore narrowed the concept of pleadings to be framing the issues in a case. Pleadings are not motions in and of themselves, and courts replaced the demurrer mechanism with the motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action or the application to strike out particulars of claim.
259:
trial. A case would begin with a complaint in which the plaintiff alleged the facts entitling him to relief, then the defendant would file any one of a variety of pleas as an answer, followed by a replication from the plaintiff, a rejoinder from the defendant, a surrejoinder from the plaintiff, a rebutter from the defendant, and a surrebutter from the plaintiff. At each stage, a party could file a demurrer to the other's pleading (essentially a request that the court immediately rule on whether the pleading was legally adequate before they had to file a pleading in response) or simply file another pleading in response.
298:
pleadings. Instead of piling layers and layers of pleadings and averments on top of each other, a pleading that was attacked by demurrer would either be completely superseded by an amended pleading or would proceed immediately "at issue" as to the validly pleaded parts. This meant that to determine what the parties were currently fighting about, a stranger to a case would no longer have to read the entire case file from scratch, but could (in theory) look
286:, and eventually spread to 26 other states. Code pleading sought to abolish the distinction between law and equity. It unified civil procedure for all types of actions as much as possible. The focus shifted from pleading the right form of action (that is, the right procedure) to pleading the right cause of action (that is, a substantive right to be enforced by the law).
368:), employs a system of fact pleading wherein it is only necessary to plead the facts that give rise to a cause of action. It is not necessary even for the petitioner to identify the cause of action being pleaded. However, mere conclusory allegations such as "the defendant was negligent" are not, by themselves, sufficient to sustain a cause of action.
289:
Code pleading stripped out most of the legal fictions that had encrusted common law pleading by requiring parties to plead "ultimate facts." This means that to plead a cause of action, the pleader has to plead each element and also allege specific facts which, if proven with evidence at trial, would
258:
In its final form in the 19th century, common law pleading was terribly complex and slow by modern standards. The parties would normally go through several rounds of pleadings before the parties were deemed to have clearly stated their controversy, so that the case was "at issue" and could proceed to
417:
The use of "pleaded" versus "pled" as the past tense version of "pleading" has been a subject of controversy among many of those that practice law. "Pled" is almost never used in
Australian publications, while being somewhat common in American, British, and Canadian publications. In a 2010 search of
142:
In
England and Wales, the first pleading is a Claim Form, issued under either Part 7 or Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, which sets out the nature of the action and the relief sought, and may give brief particulars of the claim. The Claimant also has the option, under Practice Direction 7A.61 to
266:
The result of all this complexity was that to ascertain what was "at issue" in a case, a stranger to the case (i.e., such as a newly appointed judge) would have to sift through a huge pile of pleadings to figure out what had happened to the original averments of the complaint and whether there was
262:
Generally, a plea could be dilatory or peremptory. There were three kinds of dilatory plea: to the jurisdiction, in suspension, or in abatement. The first challenged the court's jurisdiction, the second asked the court to stay the action, and the third asked the court to dismiss the action without
246:
evolved as separate judicial systems, each with its own procedures and remedies. Because the types of claims eligible for consideration was capped early during the development of the
English legal system, claims that might have been acceptable to the courts' evolving sense of justice often did not
297:
Code pleading also drastically shortened the pleading process. Most of the old common law pleadings were abolished. From now on, a case required only a complaint and an answer, with an optional cross-complaint and cross-answer, and with the demurrer kept as the standard attack on improper
403:
possibilities, for example, submitting an injury complaint alleging that the harm to the plaintiff caused by the defendant was so outrageous that it must have either been intended as a malicious attack or, if not, must have been due to gross negligence.
247:
match up perfectly with any of the established forms of action. Lawyers had to engage in great ingenuity to shoehorn their clients' claims into existing forms of action. The result was that at common law, pleadings were stuffed full of awkward
146:
When used in civil proceedings in
England and Wales, the term "complaint" refers to the mechanism by which civil proceedings are instituted in the magistrates' court and may be either written or oral.
375:, for example, requires that a complaint "must assert a legally recognized cause of action and it must plead facts which bring the particular case within that cause of action."
302:
at the most recent version of the complaint filed by the plaintiff, the defendant's most recent answer to that complaint, and any court orders on demurrers to either pleading.
810:
But because pleaded is much more common and is unanimously recommended by
English authorities and reference books (the dozen or so we checked, anyway), it is safer than pled.
346:
was to relax the strict rules of code pleading. However, each state also has its own rules of civil procedure, which may require different, looser, or stricter rules in
899:
143:
serve
Particulars of Claim (a document setting out the allegations which found the cause of action) within 14 days of the issue of the Claim Form.
572:
305:
Code pleading was criticized because many lawyers felt that it was too difficult to fully research all the facts needed to bring a complaint
455:
736:
290:
constitute proof of that element. Failure to provide such detail could lead to dismissal of the case if the defendant successfully
504:
426:
call for "pleaded", and a
Westlaw search shows the US Supreme Court has used pleaded in over 3,000 opinions and pled in only 26.
343:
335:
90:
68:
169:
is a pleading filed by a defendant which admits or denies the specific allegations set forth in a complaint and constitutes a
440:
768:
560:
339:
64:
309:
one had even initiated the action, and thus meritorious plaintiffs could not bring their complaints in time before the
347:
236:, which severely limited the evolution of the common law writ system). The emphasis was on procedure over substance.
703:
75:. Each state in the United States has its own statutes and rules that govern pleading in the courts of that state.
52:
is a formal written statement of one party's claims or defenses in response to another party's complaint(s) in a
932:
922:
322:
72:
823:
310:
614:
60:
313:
expired. Code pleading has also been criticized as promoting "hypertechnical reading of legal papers".
861:
391:
384:
233:
435:
104:
722:
400:
170:
797:
361:, a state that derives its legal tradition from the Spanish and French civil law (as opposed to
294:
to the complaint on the basis that it merely stated "legal conclusions" or "evidentiary facts."
255:(still commonly used in American pleading to name unknown parties) is a remnant of this period.
732:
679:
654:
629:
568:
470:
112:
726:
589:
536:
465:
279:
251:
that had little to do with the actual "real-world" facts of the case. The placeholder name
108:
31:
927:
450:
371:
Other states, including
Connecticut and New Jersey, are also fact-pleading jurisdictions.
229:
221:
181:
893:
460:
445:
225:
116:
56:. The parties' pleadings in a case define the issues to be adjudicated in the action.
916:
396:
331:
248:
131:. In equity, sometimes called chancery, the initial pleading may be called either a
422:, "pled" is used in a narrow majority of cases over "pleaded". The AP stylebook and
847:
243:
173:
by a defendant. In
England and Wales, the equivalent pleading is called a Defence.
165:
53:
27:
In law, statement of a party's claims to another party's claims in a civil action
907:
485:
365:
283:
128:
124:
83:
Pleading in early
American law was done through common law writs (for example
792:
358:
204:
196:
189:
177:
157:
100:
95:
728:
Rights and Retrenchment: The Counterrevolution Against Federal Litigation
475:
372:
291:
252:
203:
to raise a cause of action to defend, reduce or set off the claim of the
152:
85:
769:"Popular Threads 2010 | Solo, Small Firm and General Practice Division"
419:
362:
184:
against another defendant named by the plaintiff and may also file a
17:
224:
used in England, which early on developed a strong emphasis on the
30:
For the poem by Arthur L. Salmon set to music by Edward Elgar, see
681:
The Historical Development of Code Pleading in America and England
656:
The Historical Development of Code Pleading in America and England
631:
The Historical Development of Code Pleading in America and England
591:
The Historical Development of Code Pleading in America and England
538:
The Historical Development of Code Pleading in America and England
480:
38:
892:
567:(4 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 76–79.
103:
which initiates a lawsuit. A complaint sets forth the relevant
239:
45:
48:
as practiced in countries that follow the English models, a
267:
anything left to be actually adjudicated by the court.
119:
clause). In some situations, a complaint is called a
731:. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 69.
541:. Cincinnati: W.H. Anderson & Co. pp. 24–38
188:bring other parties into a case by the process of
123:, in which case the party filing it is called the
903:. Vol. 21 (11th ed.). pp. 831–835.
684:. Cincinnati: W.H. Anderson & Co. p. 119
659:. Cincinnati: W.H. Anderson & Co. p. 118
634:. Cincinnati: W.H. Anderson & Co. p. 207
115:and sometimes a statement of damages claimed (an
99:is the first pleading in American law filed by a
618:, 78 U.S. App. D.C. 66, 136 F.2d 796, 799 (1943)
594:. Cincinnati: W.H. Anderson & Co. p. 15
330:is the dominant form of pleading used in the
8:
707:, 710 F.2d 1078, 1080-81 n.1 (5th Cir. 1983)
824:"Grammer Pole of the Weak: Pleaded v. Pled"
399:is employed to permit a party to argue two
717:
715:
713:
338:were adopted to govern civil procedure in
758:Teter v. Clemens, 112 Ill. 2d 252 (1986)
565:An Introduction to English Legal History
73:pleading in United States federal courts
497:
220:Common law pleading was the system of
7:
107:that give rise to one or more legal
678:Hepburn, Charles McGuffey (1897).
653:Hepburn, Charles McGuffey (1897).
628:Hepburn, Charles McGuffey (1897).
588:Hepburn, Charles McGuffey (1897).
535:Hepburn, Charles McGuffey (1897).
156:is a pleading (usually filed by a
25:
908:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
891:Craies, William Feilden (1911).
344:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
336:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
278:was first introduced in 1850 in
91:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
69:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
793:"Pleaded vs. pled – Grammarist"
516:s.51 Magistrates Court Act 1980
704:United States v. Uni Oil, Inc.
441:Further and better particulars
1:
137:bill of complaint in chancery
65:pleading in England and Wales
340:United States federal courts
525:Civil Procedure Rules, 15.2
424:The Chicago Manual of Style
127:and the other party is the
949:
382:
320:
36:
29:
725:; Farhang, Sean (2017).
323:Pleading (United States)
37:Not to be confused with
900:Encyclopædia Britannica
456:More definite statement
420:Westlaw legal database
311:statute of limitations
321:Further information:
186:third-party complaint
61:Civil Procedure Rules
866:Quick and Dirty Tips
848:"Horace and Westlaw"
392:alternative pleading
385:Alternative pleading
334:today. In 1938, the
234:Provisions of Oxford
232:(as a result of the
773:www.americanbar.org
723:Burbank, Stephen B.
436:Bill of particulars
413:"pleaded" vs "pled"
105:allegations of fact
615:Hurwitz v. Hurwitz
401:mutually exclusive
342:. One goal of the
171:general appearance
862:"Pled or Pleaded"
822:Zaretsky, Staci.
574:978-0-406-93053-8
471:Negative pregnant
113:prayer for relief
16:(Redirected from
940:
904:
896:
894:"Pleading"
878:
877:
875:
873:
858:
852:
851:
844:
838:
837:
835:
834:
819:
813:
812:
807:
806:
789:
783:
782:
780:
779:
765:
759:
756:
750:
749:
747:
745:
719:
708:
700:
694:
693:
691:
689:
675:
669:
668:
666:
664:
650:
644:
643:
641:
639:
625:
619:
610:
604:
603:
601:
599:
585:
579:
578:
563:(January 2002).
557:
551:
550:
548:
546:
532:
526:
523:
517:
514:
508:
502:
466:Motion for leave
228:rather than the
180:may also file a
109:causes of action
32:Pleading (Elgar)
21:
948:
947:
943:
942:
941:
939:
938:
937:
933:Legal documents
923:Civil procedure
913:
912:
890:
887:
882:
881:
871:
869:
860:
859:
855:
846:
845:
841:
832:
830:
821:
820:
816:
804:
802:
791:
790:
786:
777:
775:
767:
766:
762:
757:
753:
743:
741:
739:
721:
720:
711:
701:
697:
687:
685:
677:
676:
672:
662:
660:
652:
651:
647:
637:
635:
627:
626:
622:
611:
607:
597:
595:
587:
586:
582:
575:
559:
558:
554:
544:
542:
534:
533:
529:
524:
520:
515:
511:
503:
499:
494:
451:Legal syllogism
432:
415:
410:
387:
381:
356:
328:Notice pleading
325:
319:
282:and in 1851 in
273:
230:cause of action
222:civil procedure
218:
213:
182:cross-complaint
81:
42:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
946:
944:
936:
935:
930:
925:
915:
914:
911:
910:
905:
886:
885:External links
883:
880:
879:
853:
839:
814:
801:. 19 July 2011
784:
760:
751:
737:
709:
695:
670:
645:
620:
605:
580:
573:
552:
527:
518:
509:
496:
495:
493:
490:
489:
488:
483:
478:
473:
468:
463:
461:Motion (legal)
458:
453:
448:
446:General denial
443:
438:
431:
428:
414:
411:
409:
406:
383:Main article:
380:
377:
355:
352:
318:
315:
272:
269:
249:legal fictions
226:form of action
217:
214:
212:
209:
117:ad quod damnum
80:
77:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
945:
934:
931:
929:
926:
924:
921:
920:
918:
909:
906:
902:
901:
895:
889:
888:
884:
868:. Feb 9, 2017
867:
863:
857:
854:
850:. 2010-11-12.
849:
843:
840:
829:
828:Above the Law
825:
818:
815:
811:
800:
799:
794:
788:
785:
774:
770:
764:
761:
755:
752:
740:
738:9781107136991
734:
730:
729:
724:
718:
716:
714:
710:
706:
705:
699:
696:
683:
682:
674:
671:
658:
657:
649:
646:
633:
632:
624:
621:
617:
616:
609:
606:
593:
592:
584:
581:
576:
570:
566:
562:
556:
553:
540:
539:
531:
528:
522:
519:
513:
510:
506:
505:F. R. Civ. P.
501:
498:
491:
487:
484:
482:
479:
477:
474:
472:
469:
467:
464:
462:
459:
457:
454:
452:
449:
447:
444:
442:
439:
437:
434:
433:
429:
427:
425:
421:
412:
407:
405:
402:
398:
397:legal fiction
395:
393:
386:
378:
376:
374:
369:
367:
364:
360:
353:
351:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
332:United States
329:
324:
316:
314:
312:
308:
303:
301:
295:
293:
287:
285:
281:
277:
276:Code pleading
270:
268:
264:
260:
256:
254:
250:
245:
241:
237:
235:
231:
227:
223:
215:
210:
208:
206:
202:
201:counter-claim
198:
193:
191:
187:
183:
179:
174:
172:
168:
167:
161:
159:
155:
154:
148:
144:
140:
138:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
111:along with a
110:
106:
102:
98:
97:
92:
89:). Under the
88:
87:
78:
76:
74:
70:
66:
63:(CPR) govern
62:
57:
55:
51:
47:
40:
33:
19:
898:
870:. Retrieved
865:
856:
842:
831:. Retrieved
827:
817:
809:
803:. Retrieved
796:
787:
776:. Retrieved
772:
763:
754:
742:. Retrieved
727:
702:
698:
686:. Retrieved
680:
673:
661:. Retrieved
655:
648:
636:. Retrieved
630:
623:
613:
608:
596:. Retrieved
590:
583:
564:
555:
543:. Retrieved
537:
530:
521:
512:
500:
423:
416:
390:
388:
370:
357:
327:
326:
306:
304:
299:
296:
288:
275:
274:
265:
261:
257:
238:
219:
200:
194:
185:
175:
164:
162:
151:
149:
145:
141:
136:
132:
120:
94:
84:
82:
58:
54:civil action
49:
43:
598:18 November
561:Baker, John
486:Prima facie
379:Alternative
348:state court
199:may file a
917:Categories
833:2018-09-16
805:2018-09-16
798:Grammarist
778:2018-09-16
492:References
408:Linguistic
366:common law
284:California
216:Common law
129:respondent
125:petitioner
359:Louisiana
205:plaintiff
197:defendant
190:impleader
178:defendant
158:defendant
101:plaintiff
96:complaint
688:4 August
663:4 August
638:4 August
545:4 August
476:Petition
430:See also
373:Illinois
292:demurred
280:New York
253:John Doe
153:demurrer
133:petition
121:petition
86:demurrer
79:Examples
50:pleading
872:Oct 28,
744:12 July
363:English
211:Systems
71:govern
928:Notary
735:
612:e.g.,
571:
317:Notice
307:before
244:equity
166:answer
135:or a
18:Plead
874:2019
746:2020
733:ISBN
690:2020
665:2020
640:2020
600:2023
569:ISBN
547:2020
481:Plea
418:the
354:Fact
300:only
271:Code
242:and
59:The
39:Plea
389:In
240:Law
163:An
46:law
44:In
919::
897:.
864:.
826:.
808:.
795:.
771:.
712:^
350:.
207:.
195:A
192:.
176:A
150:A
139:.
93:a
67:.
876:.
836:.
781:.
748:.
692:.
667:.
642:.
602:.
577:.
549:.
507:3
394:,
41:.
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.