1157:
1096:
1106:
1121:
201:" statements, a distinction on whose existence philosophers have been unable to agree to this day. we will see that many defendants charged with impossible attempts are not in fact attempting the crime they are charged with attempting. They merely think they are committing a crime. ...
135:
All questions of fact can be proved or disproved by reference to a certain standard of evidence. Depending on the nature of the matter, the standard of proof may require that a fact be proven to be "more likely than not" (there is barely more evidence for the fact than against, as established by a
50:
as well as inferences arising from those facts. Answers to questions of law are generally expressed in terms of broad legal principles. They can be applied to many situations rather than particular circumstances or facts. An answer to a question of law as applied to the specific facts of a case is
66:
deem questions of fact as settled by the lower courts and will only consider questions of law. They thus may refer a case back to a lower court to re-apply the law and answer any fact-based evaluations based on their answer on the application of the law.
192:
ran over the plaintiff with his car at the intersection of State Street and
Chestnut Street" is a statement of fact or a legal conclusion. In fact, the distinction between law and fact is just the legal version of the philosophical distinction between
957:
188:'s complaint in a civil action only state the "facts" of his case, not any "legal conclusions." Unfortunately, no one has ever been able to tell whether the allegation that "on November 9, the defendant
128:
as well as inferences arising from those facts. Such a question is distinct from a question of law, which must be answered by applying relevant legal principles. The answer to a question of fact (a "
176:
argues that the difference between questions of law and questions of fact is ill-defined, with frequent disagreement over whether a given statement was the former or the latter.
165:
generally do not consider appeals based on errors of fact (errors in answering a question of fact). Instead, the findings of fact of the first venue are usually given great
79:
will only answer questions of law asked by judges of national courts if they are uncertain about the interpretation of the law of multilateral organizations.
440:
42:, is a question that must be answered by applying relevant legal principles to the interpretation of the law. Such a question is distinct from a
885:
460:
1129:
223:
198:
846:
406:
308:
796:
551:
915:
1057:
987:
646:
355:"The Decision is Final: English High Court Rules That There Can Be No Appeal Against Arbitration Awards on Issues of Fact"
332:
1147:
528:
273:
1124:
992:
433:
394:
248:
1182:
1099:
791:
503:
354:
212:
76:
1074:
962:
947:
939:
821:
72:
59:
1042:
967:
816:
631:
483:
426:
362:
556:
1177:
1063:
1052:
137:
656:
263:
180:
The distinction between "law" and "fact" has proved obscure wherever it is employed. For instance, the
1012:
952:
751:
278:
173:
811:
586:
233:
68:
1105:
905:
895:
666:
571:
194:
736:
626:
1114:
875:
731:
726:
696:
591:
513:
493:
478:
402:
398:
385:
304:
258:
977:
621:
518:
865:
855:
756:
721:
716:
576:
561:
488:
162:
101:
925:
1007:
972:
831:
741:
711:
691:
686:
661:
596:
566:
541:
268:
253:
125:
47:
1171:
982:
826:
771:
671:
651:
641:
611:
601:
508:
449:
145:
88:
63:
1080:
1036:
801:
746:
616:
536:
470:
324:
238:
158:
1156:
1002:
997:
776:
706:
681:
676:
606:
581:
498:
104:, whereas findings of fact in a common law legal system are rarely overturned.
1161:
1109:
806:
766:
761:
228:
189:
181:
93:
17:
836:
701:
546:
185:
166:
781:
1047:
636:
132:") usually depends on particular circumstances or factual situations.
1029:
386:"The Crime That Never Was: a Fake Opinion in Case involving Facts"
154:
83:
786:
418:
303:(1986 reprint ed.). Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein & Co.
301:
A Treatise on Trial by Jury, Including
Questions of Law and Fact
243:
150:
124:, is a question that must be answered by reference to facts and
97:
422:
113:
31:
100:. Conclusions of law are more readily reconsidered by an
86:
or equivalent, while questions of fact are resolved by a
1134:
1145:
391:
Bad Acts and Guilt Minds: Conundrums of
Criminal Law
1021:
938:
845:
527:
469:
46:, which must be answered by reference to facts and
384:
143:Answers to questions of fact are determined by a
136:preponderance of the evidence) or true beyond
434:
8:
441:
427:
419:
958:Fundamental theory of Catholic canon law
1152:
291:
7:
1120:
886:Elements of the Philosophy of Right
82:Questions of law are resolved by a
25:
1155:
1119:
1104:
1095:
1094:
916:Natural Law and Natural Rights
224:Analytic–synthetic distinction
1:
333:Cornell University Law School
161:, such as England and Wales,
353:Sharma, Riecha; Tacey, Sam.
993:Libertarian theories of law
395:University of Chicago Press
329:Legal Information Institute
1199:
504:International legal theory
1090:
456:
274:Lord Advocate's Reference
77:European Court of Justice
1075:Rational-legal authority
963:German historical school
948:Analytical jurisprudence
73:Benelux Court of Justice
1043:Judicial interpretation
299:Proffatt, John (1877).
184:used to require that a
51:often referred to as a
1130:WikiProject Philosophy
484:Critical legal studies
363:Edwards Wildman Palmer
249:Fact–value distinction
203:
27:Subject of court cases
1053:Law without the state
178:
169:by appellate courts.
1013:Virtue jurisprudence
953:Deontological ethics
279:Problem of induction
69:International courts
234:Demarcation problem
62:jurisdictions, the
906:The Concept of Law
896:Pure Theory of Law
383:Katz, Leo (1987).
359:edwardswildman.com
325:"Question of fact"
244:Fact § In law
120:, also known as a
96:system is often a
38:, also known as a
1183:Philosophy of law
1143:
1142:
1115:Philosophy portal
876:The Spirit of Law
514:Philosophy of law
494:Economic analysis
479:Constitutionalism
259:Findings of facts
53:conclusion of law
16:(Redirected from
1190:
1160:
1159:
1151:
1123:
1122:
1108:
1098:
1097:
978:Legal positivism
931:
921:
911:
901:
891:
881:
871:
861:
519:Sociology of law
443:
436:
429:
420:
413:
412:
388:
380:
374:
373:
371:
369:
350:
344:
343:
341:
339:
321:
315:
314:
296:
264:Is–ought problem
172:The philosopher
163:appellate courts
138:reasonable doubt
118:question of fact
108:Question of fact
44:question of fact
21:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1154:
1146:
1144:
1139:
1125:WikiProject Law
1086:
1070:Question of law
1017:
934:
929:
919:
909:
899:
889:
879:
869:
866:Treatise on Law
859:
841:
523:
489:Comparative law
465:
452:
447:
417:
416:
409:
393:. Chicago, IL:
382:
381:
377:
367:
365:
352:
351:
347:
337:
335:
323:
322:
318:
311:
298:
297:
293:
288:
283:
208:
130:finding of fact
110:
102:appellate court
92:, which in the
36:question of law
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1196:
1194:
1186:
1185:
1180:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1141:
1140:
1138:
1137:
1132:
1127:
1117:
1112:
1102:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1085:
1084:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1033:
1025:
1023:
1019:
1018:
1016:
1015:
1010:
1008:Utilitarianism
1005:
1000:
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
973:Legal moralism
970:
968:Interpretivism
965:
960:
955:
950:
944:
942:
936:
935:
933:
932:
922:
912:
902:
892:
882:
872:
862:
851:
849:
843:
842:
840:
839:
834:
829:
824:
819:
814:
809:
804:
799:
794:
789:
784:
779:
774:
769:
764:
759:
754:
749:
744:
739:
734:
729:
724:
719:
714:
709:
704:
699:
694:
689:
684:
679:
674:
669:
664:
659:
654:
649:
644:
639:
634:
629:
624:
619:
614:
609:
604:
599:
594:
589:
584:
579:
574:
569:
564:
559:
554:
549:
544:
539:
533:
531:
525:
524:
522:
521:
516:
511:
506:
501:
496:
491:
486:
481:
475:
473:
467:
466:
464:
463:
457:
454:
453:
448:
446:
445:
438:
431:
423:
415:
414:
407:
375:
345:
316:
309:
290:
289:
287:
284:
282:
281:
276:
271:
269:Judgment (law)
266:
261:
256:
254:Falsifiability
251:
246:
241:
236:
231:
226:
221:
209:
207:
204:
174:Alfred Lessing
109:
106:
64:highest courts
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1195:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1176:
1175:
1173:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1149:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1101:
1093:
1092:
1089:
1083:
1082:
1078:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1038:
1034:
1032:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1024:
1020:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
983:Legal realism
981:
979:
976:
974:
971:
969:
966:
964:
961:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
946:
945:
943:
941:
937:
928:
927:
923:
918:
917:
913:
908:
907:
903:
898:
897:
893:
888:
887:
883:
878:
877:
873:
868:
867:
863:
858:
857:
853:
852:
850:
848:
844:
838:
835:
833:
830:
828:
825:
823:
820:
818:
815:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
795:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
778:
775:
773:
770:
768:
765:
763:
760:
758:
755:
753:
750:
748:
745:
743:
740:
738:
735:
733:
730:
728:
725:
723:
720:
718:
715:
713:
710:
708:
705:
703:
700:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
565:
563:
560:
558:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
543:
540:
538:
535:
534:
532:
530:
526:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
509:Legal history
507:
505:
502:
500:
497:
495:
492:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
476:
474:
472:
468:
462:
459:
458:
455:
451:
450:Jurisprudence
444:
439:
437:
432:
430:
425:
424:
421:
410:
408:9780226425924
404:
400:
396:
392:
387:
379:
376:
364:
360:
356:
349:
346:
334:
330:
326:
320:
317:
312:
310:9780899417073
306:
302:
295:
292:
285:
280:
277:
275:
272:
270:
267:
265:
262:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
220:
219:
215:
211:
210:
205:
202:
200:
196:
191:
187:
183:
177:
175:
170:
168:
164:
160:
159:jurisdictions
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:trier of fact
141:
139:
133:
131:
127:
123:
122:point of fact
119:
115:
107:
105:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:
89:trier of fact
85:
80:
78:
74:
70:
65:
61:
56:
54:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
18:Points of law
1178:Evidence law
1081:Usul al-Fiqh
1079:
1069:
1062:
1058:Legal system
1035:
1028:
926:Law's Empire
924:
914:
904:
894:
884:
874:
864:
854:
529:Philosophers
471:Legal theory
390:
378:
366:. Retrieved
358:
348:
336:. Retrieved
328:
319:
300:
294:
239:Epistemology
218:a posteriori
217:
213:
179:
171:
144:
142:
134:
129:
121:
117:
111:
87:
81:
71:such as the
57:
52:
43:
40:point of law
39:
35:
29:
1003:Paternalism
998:Natural law
860:(c. 355 BC)
707:Montesquieu
499:Legal norms
397:. pp.
368:11 November
338:11 November
190:negligently
58:In several
1172:Categories
1110:Law portal
737:PetraĹĽycki
727:Pashukanis
722:Olivecrona
657:Hägerström
572:Blackstone
286:References
229:Case brief
199:analytical
182:common law
157:. In many
149:such as a
94:common law
870:(c. 1270)
752:Pufendorf
687:Llewellyn
547:Aristotle
195:empirical
186:plaintiff
167:deference
60:civil law
1100:Category
1022:Concepts
988:Legalism
940:Theories
827:Voegelin
797:Scaevola
757:Radbruch
732:Perelman
717:Nussbaum
662:Jellinek
627:Habermas
622:Gurvitch
592:Durkheim
562:Beccaria
214:A priori
206:See also
126:evidence
75:and the
48:evidence
1135:changes
1048:Justice
802:Schmitt
792:Savigny
772:Reinach
697:Maistre
692:Luhmann
667:Jhering
617:Grotius
602:Ehrlich
597:Dworkin
587:Cardozo
567:Bentham
557:Bastiat
542:Aquinas
399:276–293
197:" and "
1148:Portal
1030:Dharma
930:(1986)
920:(1980)
910:(1961)
900:(1934)
890:(1820)
880:(1748)
832:Walzer
812:Suárez
777:Renner
742:Posner
712:MĂĽller
677:Kelsen
652:Hobbes
632:Haller
612:Fuller
607:Finnis
577:Bobbio
552:Austin
405:
307:
847:Works
837:Weber
822:Unger
817:Stahl
807:Shang
762:Rawls
747:Pound
682:Leoni
647:Hegel
537:Alexy
461:Index
155:judge
153:or a
84:judge
856:Laws
787:Rumi
782:Ross
702:Marx
672:Kant
642:Hart
582:Bork
403:ISBN
370:2014
340:2014
305:ISBN
216:and
151:jury
116:, a
98:jury
34:, a
1162:Law
767:Raz
637:Han
114:law
112:In
32:law
30:In
1174::
1064:Li
1037:Fa
401:.
389:.
361:.
357:.
331:.
327:.
140:.
55:.
1150::
442:e
435:t
428:v
411:.
372:.
342:.
313:.
193:"
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.