65:, the democratisation of the magistracy and the introduction of assessors into the High Court to supervise judges. The paper also stated that Labour should support everyone's right to follow their own conscience, even if this involved breaking the law. Benn said: "There is a real risk that if we are seen to be abandoning our faith, in the search for media approval, we could be seen as a purely opportunistic party that is prepared to say anything to get into office and is ready to sacrifice good policies when the opinion polls swing against us". At a socialist conference held in Benn's constituency of
42:. Sawyer's paper included recommendations on how Labour could win back the skilled working class and it reviewed Labour's policies on enterprise, wealth creation, taxation and social security. The home policy committee voted overwhelmingly in favour of Sawyer's three-year plan to produce a new statement of Labour's policies by 1990. The Labour Party's annual conference voted to endorse the Policy Review on 28 September.
100:. On 2 October, Kinnock won with 88.6% of the vote and his victory was interpreted as an endorsement of the Policy Review. On the day after Kinnock's victory, the Labour Party's conference endorsed the Policy Review by a margin of 5 to 1.
107:
voted to endorse the defence policy review by 17 votes to 8. This committed Labour to multilateral nuclear disarmament. At the Labour Party conference in
October 1989, the Policy Review documents were endorsed by large majorities.
88:
and nationalisation) were dropped, as were very high income tax rates for top earners. On 5 June, Kinnock said for the first time that Labour would not unilaterally abolish
Britain's nuclear weapons but would use
84:
The first stage of the Policy Review reported on 25 May 1988, with seven policy reports that contained 40,000 words. Policies traditionally supported by the Labour Left (such as withdrawal from the
104:
97:
372:
81:
attacked the Policy Review. Scargill said Labour's new realism was "class collaboration" that offered "palliatives not revolutionary change".
377:
28:
45:
However, MPs on the left of the Labour Party criticised the Policy Review. At the home police committee meeting that endorsed the Review,
96:
In opposition to the direction
Kinnock was leading the party, Benn launched an eight-month campaign for the position of Labour leader in
90:
85:
27:. It was appointed to formulate popular policies in the aftermath of Labour's third successive electoral defeat in
66:
35:
24:
74:
70:
38:, put forward the Policy Review plan in a paper, after consultation with Labour's leader,
62:
21:
366:
58:
39:
324:
Philip
Webster and Nicholas Wood, ‘Labour starts rethink over election failure’,
124:
Philip
Webster and Nicholas Wood, ‘Labour starts rethink over election failure’,
78:
317:
Philip
Webster and Martin Fletcher, ‘Kinnock is attacked by Labour left wing’,
166:
Philip
Webster and Martin Fletcher, ‘Kinnock is attacked by Labour left wing’,
357:
310:
Philip
Webster and David Cross, ‘Kinnock wins crucial battle over defence’,
231:
Philip
Webster and David Cross, ‘Kinnock wins crucial battle over defence’,
46:
282:
Robin Oakley and Philip
Webster, ‘Labour back Kinnock in nuclear vote’,
275:
Robin Oakley and Philip Webster, ‘Defence row shadow over Kinnock win’,
244:
Robin Oakley and Philip Webster, ‘Labour back Kinnock in nuclear vote’,
205:
Robin Oakley and Philip Webster, ‘Defence row shadow over Kinnock win’,
34:
On 14 September 1987, the chairman of Labour's home policy committee,
93:
as a bargaining chip to achieve multilateral nuclear disarmament.
54:
303:
Philip Webster, ‘Anger on left at Kinnock's nuclear switch’,
192:
Philip Webster, ‘Anger on left at Kinnock's nuclear switch’,
353:
268:
Robin Oakley, ‘Kinnock wins backing for policy reform’,
261:
Robin Oakley, ‘Kinnock gets mandate for major changes’,
218:
Robin Oakley, ‘Kinnock wins backing for policy reform’,
153:
Robin Oakley, ‘Kinnock gets mandate for major changes’,
49:
unsuccessfully put forward an alternative paper titled
289:
Philip Webster, ‘Labour seeks policy review backing’,
140:
Philip Webster, ‘Labour seeks policy review backing’,
69:on 24/25 October, left-wing Labour figures such as
8:
296:Philip Webster, ‘Labour sets a new course’,
179:Philip Webster, ‘Labour sets a new course’,
51:The Aims and Objectives of the Labour Party
136:
134:
117:
53:. This included proposals for leaving
7:
340:Labour Rebuilt: The New Model Party
338:Colin Hughes and Patrick Wintour,
14:
354:The Remaking of Labour, 1987-1997
373:History of the Labour Party (UK)
20:was a wide-ranging study by the
293:(15 September 1987), p. 2.
265:(29 September 1987), p. 1.
342:(London: Fourth Estate, 1990).
328:(9 September 1987), p. 1.
1:
321:(26 October 1987), p. 2.
286:(3 October 1989), p. 1.
279:(3 October 1988), p. 1.
272:(4 October 1988), p. 1.
105:National Executive Committee
378:1980s in the United Kingdom
394:
157:(29 September 1987), p. 1.
144:(15 September 1987), p. 2.
314:(10 May 1989), p. 1.
307:(6 June 1988), p. 1.
300:(25 May 1988), p. 8.
128:(9 September 1987), p. 1.
170:(26 October 1987), p. 2.
103:On 9 May 1989, Labour's
248:(3 October 1989), p. 1.
222:(4 October 1988), p. 1.
209:(3 October 1988), p. 1.
235:(10 May 1989), p. 1.
196:(6 June 1988), p. 1.
183:(25 May 1988), p. 8.
61:, abolition of the
86:European Community
385:
249:
242:
236:
229:
223:
216:
210:
203:
197:
190:
184:
177:
171:
164:
158:
151:
145:
138:
129:
122:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
363:
362:
349:
335:
333:Further reading
258:
253:
252:
243:
239:
230:
226:
217:
213:
204:
200:
191:
187:
178:
174:
165:
161:
152:
148:
139:
132:
123:
119:
114:
75:Ken Livingstone
71:Arthur Scargill
12:
11:
5:
391:
389:
381:
380:
375:
365:
364:
361:
360:
348:
347:External links
345:
344:
343:
334:
331:
330:
329:
322:
315:
308:
301:
294:
287:
280:
273:
266:
257:
254:
251:
250:
237:
224:
211:
198:
185:
172:
159:
146:
130:
116:
115:
113:
110:
63:House of Lords
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
390:
379:
376:
374:
371:
370:
368:
359:
355:
351:
350:
346:
341:
337:
336:
332:
327:
323:
320:
316:
313:
309:
306:
302:
299:
295:
292:
288:
285:
281:
278:
274:
271:
267:
264:
260:
259:
255:
247:
241:
238:
234:
228:
225:
221:
215:
212:
208:
202:
199:
195:
189:
186:
182:
176:
173:
169:
163:
160:
156:
150:
147:
143:
137:
135:
131:
127:
121:
118:
111:
109:
106:
101:
99:
94:
92:
87:
82:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
59:nuclear power
56:
52:
48:
43:
41:
37:
32:
30:
26:
23:
19:
18:Policy Review
339:
325:
318:
311:
304:
297:
290:
283:
276:
269:
262:
245:
240:
232:
227:
219:
214:
206:
201:
193:
188:
180:
175:
167:
162:
154:
149:
141:
125:
120:
102:
95:
83:
67:Chesterfield
50:
44:
40:Neil Kinnock
33:
25:Labour Party
17:
15:
79:Eric Heffer
367:Categories
358:Mark Bevir
256:References
36:Tom Sawyer
326:The Times
319:The Times
312:The Times
305:The Times
298:The Times
291:The Times
284:The Times
277:The Times
270:The Times
263:The Times
246:The Times
233:The Times
220:The Times
207:The Times
194:The Times
181:The Times
168:The Times
155:The Times
142:The Times
126:The Times
57:, ending
47:Tony Benn
91:Trident
22:British
356:’ by
112:Notes
98:1988
77:and
55:NATO
29:1987
16:The
369::
133:^
73:,
31:.
352:‘
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.