Knowledge

Postage stamp separation

Source 📝

298:. The Bemrose machine was designed as a rouletting machine. As such, it proved impracticable for stamp separation but in 1856 was successfully converted to a perforating machine by George C. Howard of Toppan Carpenter, stamp printers for the American Government. Both the stroke and rotary processes have been refined since then, but are basically still the ones in use in the 21st century. The key decision for the perforator is the spacing of the holes; if too far apart, the stamps will not separate easily, and the stamps are likely to tear, but if too close, the stamps will tend to come apart in normal handling. In a few cases the size of the holes has been a factor. In the case of certain stamps produced by Australia for sale in rolls rather than sheets (coil stamps) a pattern can be seen on the stamp's short side of two small, ten large and two small holes. 282:
row to be perforated in a single operation, and this became known as "comb" perforation. Perforation trials were conducted in 1849 and 1850 under the auspices of the British Government and stamps from these trials were first issued towards the end of 1850. The Archer machine proved the viability of the process but never entered service. Archer's patent for his perforating machine (no. 12,340 of 1848, dated May 23, 1849) was purchased for £4,000 in June 1853. New machines based on Archer's principles were constructed by David Napier and Son Ltd; these were initially used in October 1853 for revenue stamps and from January 1854 for postage stamps.
403:, meaning that the stamps themselves are cut entirely apart, held together only by the backing paper. At first the backing paper was itself solid, but in a repeat of history, is now slightly rouletted so as to facilitate tearing off blocks of stamps without having to remove them from the backing. Since the diecut goes all the way through the stamp, any shape will work, and the original self-adhesives were straight-edged. However, the tradition of perforation is so strong that more recent self-adhesives have a wavy diecut 179: 127: 171: 159: 151: 237:, and had to be cut from the sheet with scissors or knife. This was time-consuming and error-prone (as mangled stamps of the era attest). Once reliable separation equipment became available, nations switched rapidly. Imperforate stamps have been issued occasionally since then, either because separation equipment was temporarily unavailable (in newborn nations for instance), to makers of automatic 22: 119: 420:
For the stamp collector, perforations matter, not only as a way to distinguish different stamps (a perf 10 may be rarer and more valuable than a perf 11 of the same design), but also as part of the condition of stamps. Short or "nibbed" perfs are undesirable and reduce value, as are bent or creased
277:
and the Inland Revenue. Two such machines were built. After experimentation both machines proved to be failures. From one machine a few stamps from Plates 70 and 71 have survived. This machine consisted of lancet-shaped blades working on a fly-press principle and piercing the paper with a series of
317:
Stamps that are perforated on one pair of opposite sides and imperforate on the other have most often been produced in coils instead of sheets, but they can sometimes come from booklet panes. Booklet panes can be associated with any combination of one, two or three imperforate sides. Sheet edges
281:
Archer then abandoned this approach in favour of perforation, a process which used rows of small round pins to punch out the holes. In 1848 Archer patented his perforation machine which worked on the "stroke" principle. The arrangement of the pins enabled the top and sides of each stamp across the
337:
uses small cuts in the paper instead of holes. It was used by a number of countries, but was rarely if ever seen on modern stamps until the die-cut serpentine roulette self-adhesive varieties appeared. Varieties, often described by philatelists in French terms, include straight cuts
411:
fibers on each tooth, while simulated perforations are smooth. From 2012 to 2016 the United States also sold small numbers of the stamps issued during this period in sheets without die cuts, thus creating imperforated varieties of them. Their issuance was very controversial.
139: 446:
meaning that they are not separated on all sides. Although it is very common to have different gauges of perforation horizontally and vertically, in rare circumstances a stamp may have different perforations on opposite sides; in the case of
325:
which are uneven, either skipping a hole or by making some holes larger. In the 1990s, Great Britain began adding large elliptical holes to the perforations on each side, as an anti-counterfeiting measure.
441:
are common, occurring when a hole is not completely punched out, as are off-center perfs that cut into the design of the stamp, sometimes very badly. Occasionally pairs or larger groups of stamps may be
174:"Bantam" stamps from South West Africa showing normal and rouletted perforations. Three stamps could be printed using the paper normally used for one. Produced during World War II as an economy measure. 182:
This pair of coil stamps clearly shows the pattern of perforation holes; also, on the left side of the pair, the stamp was torn, while on the right the perforations were cut with scissors or knife.
613: 425:, which has preprinted patterns of holes in a selection of common perforations, requiring one merely to line up the stamp's perforations with the closest match. Rare stamps are often 310:
of an individual stamp) in a 2-centimeter span. The finest gauge ever used is 18 on stamps of the Malay States in the early 1950s, and the coarsest is 2, seen on the 1891 stamps of
670: 380:. Because self-adhesive stamps contain a sticky layer, it is far easier to roulette the separations, than to actually punch out the holes for perforations. 39: 603: 726: 640: 586: 557: 269:
of the United Kingdom constructed the first (rouletting) machine, the "Archer Roulette", to separate stamps. His plan, submitted to the
86: 58: 698: 510: 270: 105: 130:
Separation of imperforate stamps by scissors, knife or tearing often leads to uneven margins on the stamp as in this 1853 stamp of
65: 766: 43: 655: 318:
can produce any one imperforate side or two adjacent imperforate sides when the stamp comes from the corner of the sheet.
72: 464: 254: 690: 502: 451:
stamps only a handful of these are known to exist. The various types of perforation errors are collectively known as
54: 407:
the perforation. It can be recognized by studying the edge of the stamp closely; true perforations will have torn
426: 238: 421:
perfs. Although the collector could count the number of holes using a ruler, the usual practice is to use a
32: 178: 737: 126: 79: 608: 131: 408: 274: 221: 170: 295: 722: 694: 636: 582: 553: 506: 422: 216: 150: 750: 246: 158: 712:
The Stamp Collector's Guidebook of Worldwide Watermarks and Perforations, from 1840 to date
632: 578: 549: 291: 525:"Stamp Perforation: The Somerset House Years 1848 to 1880 (Ray Simpson and Peter Sargent) 437:
As is inevitable for a mechanical process like perforation, many things can go wrong.
250: 534:"The Bemrose Perforating Machine", The London Philatelist, February 2009 (Ray Simpson) 760: 448: 242: 187: 163: 194:
is the means by which individual stamps are made easily detachable from each other.
396: 384: 266: 496: 306:
The standard for describing perforation is the number of holes (or the "teeth" or
399:
in 1964, and by the 1990s these stamps came into wide use. These are inevitably
202: 21: 138: 383:
A few types of stamps have combined rouletting and perforation, for instance
143: 472:– stamps perforated across the middle with letters or a pattern or monogram 118: 377: 154:
Perforated and imperforate versions of the same Austrian stamp of 1920
751:
Images of different types of perforations, misperforations and errors
469: 311: 177: 169: 157: 149: 137: 125: 117: 233:
In the early years, from 1840 until 1850, all stamps were issued
146:, from Plate 70, perforated with the Archer experimental roulette 719:
Stamp Perforations with Particular Emphasis on Canadian Stamps
627:
Kloetzel, James E.; et al., eds. (2008). "South Africa".
544:
Kloetzel, James E.; et al., eds. (2008). "Introduction".
15: 314:. Modern stamp perforations tend to range from 11 to 14. 273:
on 1 October 1847, was referred to the departments of the
721:. Ottawa: British North America Philatelic Society, 2009 573:
Kloetzel, James E.; et al., eds. (2008). "Finland".
669:(Sharp Photography Publications, 2021) ASIN B091MBTGJ7 245:did this in the 1900s and 1910s), as novelties for 46:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 714:. Racine, WI.: Whitman Publishing Co., 1966 256p. 290:Also in 1854 a "rotary process" was patented by 220:: cut paper to shape using a metal die—used for 656:USPS press sheets: more questions than answers 631:. Vol. 6 (165th ed.). Sidney, Ohio: 577:. Vol. 2 (165th ed.). Sidney, Ohio: 548:. Vol. 1 (165th ed.). Sidney, Ohio: 8: 395:The first self-adhesive stamp was issued by 370: 362: 354: 346: 339: 629:Scott 2009 Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue 575:Scott 2009 Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue 546:Scott 2009 Standard Postage Stamp Catalogue 368:), sawtooth and the serpentine roulettes ( 206:: cutting rows and columns of small holes 106:Learn how and when to remove this message 604:"Stamp separation appears in many forms" 249:(particularly when stamps are issued in 487: 667:A Sharp Eye on collecting US Classics 616:from the original on 2 February 2017. 429:in case they have been reperforated. 7: 740:, March 1954, Vol. XXCII, No. 7. 3p. 212:: small horizontal and vertical cuts 44:adding citations to reliable sources 602:Baadke, Michael (2 November 1998). 14: 20: 197:Methods of separation include: 122:The Penny Black is imperforate. 31:needs additional citations for 376:) used by the early stamps of 352:with inked cutting bar), arc ( 1: 465:Errors, freaks, and oddities 691:American Philatelic Society 503:American Philatelic Society 495:Williams, Louis N. (1990). 783: 302:Measurement and variations 162:A rouletted United States 55:"Postage stamp separation" 687:Fundamentals of Philately 498:Fundamentals of Philately 348:percée en lignes colorées 734:Centenary Of Perforation 323:syncopated perforations 239:stamp vending equipment 767:Philatelic terminology 732:Williams, L.N. and M. 685:Williams, L.N. and M. 477:References and sources 371: 363: 355: 347: 340: 183: 175: 167: 155: 147: 135: 123: 738:Gibbons Stamp Monthly 501:. State College, PA: 181: 173: 161: 153: 141: 129: 121: 633:Scott Publishing Co. 581:pp. 1119–1120. 579:Scott Publishing Co. 550:Scott Publishing Co. 391:Self-adhesive stamps 222:self-adhesive stamps 40:improve this article 444:imperforate between 360:), sewing-machine ( 321:Variations include 275:General Post Office 372:perce en serpentin 296:Henry Howe Bemrose 286:The rotary process 271:Postmaster General 184: 176: 168: 156: 148: 136: 124: 727:978-1-89739-148-8 693:, 1990) Chap. 15 642:978-0-89487-417-8 609:Linn's Stamp News 588:978-0-89487-417-8 559:978-0-89487-417-8 423:perforation gauge 142:Vertical pair of 132:Van Diemen's Land 116: 115: 108: 90: 774: 710:Felix, Ervin J. 673: 664: 658: 653: 647: 646: 624: 618: 617: 599: 593: 592: 570: 564: 563: 541: 535: 532: 526: 523: 517: 516: 492: 374: 366: 358: 350: 343: 341:percée en lignes 247:stamp collectors 111: 104: 100: 97: 91: 89: 48: 24: 16: 782: 781: 777: 776: 775: 773: 772: 771: 757: 756: 747: 707: 705:Further reading 677: 676: 665: 661: 654: 650: 643: 626: 625: 621: 601: 600: 596: 589: 572: 571: 567: 560: 543: 542: 538: 533: 529: 524: 520: 513: 505:. p. 756. 494: 493: 489: 479: 461: 435: 418: 393: 364:perce en points 332: 304: 292:William Bemrose 288: 263: 251:souvenir sheets 231: 112: 101: 95: 92: 49: 47: 37: 25: 12: 11: 5: 780: 778: 770: 769: 759: 758: 755: 754: 746: 745:External links 743: 742: 741: 730: 717:Johnson, R.A. 715: 706: 703: 702: 701: 682: 681: 675: 674: 659: 648: 641: 619: 594: 587: 565: 558: 536: 527: 518: 511: 486: 485: 484: 483: 478: 475: 474: 473: 467: 460: 457: 434: 431: 417: 414: 392: 389: 331: 328: 303: 300: 287: 284: 262: 259: 230: 227: 226: 225: 213: 207: 188:postage stamps 114: 113: 28: 26: 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 779: 768: 765: 764: 762: 752: 749: 748: 744: 739: 735: 731: 728: 724: 720: 716: 713: 709: 708: 704: 700: 699:0-933580-13-4 696: 692: 688: 684: 683: 679: 678: 672: 671:(read online) 668: 663: 660: 657: 652: 649: 644: 638: 634: 630: 623: 620: 615: 611: 610: 605: 598: 595: 590: 584: 580: 576: 569: 566: 561: 555: 552:p. 23A. 551: 547: 540: 537: 531: 528: 522: 519: 514: 512:0-933580-13-4 508: 504: 500: 499: 491: 488: 481: 480: 476: 471: 468: 466: 463: 462: 458: 456: 454: 450: 445: 440: 432: 430: 428: 424: 415: 413: 410: 406: 402: 398: 390: 388: 386: 381: 379: 375: 373: 367: 365: 359: 357: 356:percée en arc 351: 349: 342: 336: 329: 327: 324: 319: 315: 313: 309: 301: 299: 297: 293: 285: 283: 279: 276: 272: 268: 260: 258: 256: 252: 248: 244: 243:United States 240: 236: 228: 223: 219: 218: 214: 211: 208: 205: 204: 200: 199: 198: 195: 193: 189: 180: 172: 165: 164:revenue stamp 160: 152: 145: 140: 133: 128: 120: 110: 107: 99: 88: 85: 81: 78: 74: 71: 67: 64: 60: 57: –  56: 52: 51:Find sources: 45: 41: 35: 34: 29:This article 27: 23: 18: 17: 733: 718: 711: 686: 666: 662: 651: 635:p. 37. 628: 622: 607: 597: 574: 568: 545: 539: 530: 521: 497: 490: 452: 443: 438: 436: 419: 404: 400: 397:Sierra Leone 394: 385:South Africa 382: 369: 361: 353: 345: 334: 333: 322: 320: 316: 307: 305: 289: 280: 267:Henry Archer 264: 261:Henry Archer 234: 232: 215: 209: 201: 196: 191: 185: 102: 93: 83: 76: 69: 62: 50: 38:Please help 33:verification 30: 439:Blind perfs 235:imperforate 229:Early years 203:perforation 427:expertized 416:Collecting 405:simulating 335:Rouletting 330:Rouletting 217:diecutting 210:rouletting 192:separation 96:April 2014 66:newspapers 387:in 1942. 265:In 1847, 253:), or as 761:Category 614:Archived 459:See also 453:misperfs 680:Sources 378:Finland 166:of 1898 80:scholar 736:. In: 725:  697:  639:  585:  556:  509:  470:Perfin 433:Errors 401:diecut 344:, and 312:Bhopal 278:cuts. 255:errors 144:1d red 82:  75:  68:  61:  53:  729:100p. 482:Notes 409:paper 308:perfs 241:(the 87:JSTOR 73:books 723:ISBN 695:ISBN 637:ISBN 583:ISBN 554:ISBN 507:ISBN 294:and 186:For 59:news 42:by 763:: 612:. 606:. 455:. 449:US 257:. 190:, 753:. 689:( 645:. 591:. 562:. 515:. 338:( 224:. 134:. 109:) 103:( 98:) 94:( 84:· 77:· 70:· 63:· 36:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Postage stamp separation"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message


Van Diemen's Land

1d red


revenue stamp


postage stamps
perforation
diecutting
self-adhesive stamps
stamp vending equipment
United States
stamp collectors
souvenir sheets
errors

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.