78:
period if he could show that he was not aware of the injuries himself until after the limitation period had expired and if he gained the permission of the court. After a series of problems emerged, including vagueness on a point even the House of Lords was unable to clarify and poor draftsmanship,
55:
to allow actions in some cases where the injured party had not discovered the injury until after the standard date of expiration. The Act was based on the report of the
68:
44:
101:
71:. The draft bill was presented to Parliament on 6 May 1963; it was given the Royal Assent on 31 July and came into force on the same day.
56:
48:
59:
Committee on
Limitation of Actions in Cases of Personal Injury, created after the Court of Appeal decision in the case of
21:
27:
75:
52:
85:
80:
39:
95:
17:
74:
The act allowed an injured party to bring a claim outside the normal
63:, and the Committee notably produced their final report before
79:
the Act was repealed bit by bit during the 1970s, with the
28:
Portal:Law of
England and Wales/Selected legislation/4
8:
83:scrapping the last remaining sections. (
7:
35:
49:Parliament of the United Kingdom
1:
102:Law Portal selected statutes
118:
76:statute of limitations
67:had been heard in the
53:statute of limitations
81:Limitation Act 1980
61:Cartledge v Jopling
40:Limitation Act 1963
51:that amended the
26:(Redirected from
22:Selected statutes
109:
31:
117:
116:
112:
111:
110:
108:
107:
106:
92:
91:
86:Full article...
43:(c. 47) was an
33:
32:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
115:
113:
105:
104:
94:
93:
69:House of Lords
34:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
114:
103:
100:
99:
97:
90:
88:
87:
82:
77:
72:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
50:
46:
42:
41:
29:
23:
19:
84:
73:
64:
60:
38:
36:
18:Portal:Law
65:Cartledge
96:Category
20: |
47:of the
57:Davies
16:<
37:The
45:act
98::
89:)
30:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.