1933:
31:
347:
to police in advance of the lawyer's advice that Moore considered before accepting the plea offer. The court concluded the suppression motion would have been fruitless in light of Moore's other admissible confession to two witnesses. Counsel gave that as his reason for not making the motion. He added
315:
countryside, where Moore fatally shot him. Afterwards, Moore and one accomplice told Moore's brother and the accomplice's girlfriend that they had intended to scare Rogers, but that Moore had accidentally shot him. Moore and the accomplice repeated this account to the police. On the advice of
298:
relief on state-law claims. In a unanimous ruling, the court held that habeas relief may not be granted with respect to any claim that a state-court has found on the merits unless the state-court decision denying relief involves an "unreasonable application" of "clearly established
2013:
1998:
505:
405:
82:
609:
277:
273:
1860:
2018:
2008:
2023:
1993:
1894:
600:
2003:
1974:
1701:
993:
1940:
1474:
905:
755:
291:
35:
1660:
336:
1621:
1522:
311:
Respondent Moore and two accomplices attacked a man, tied him up, and threw him in the trunk of a car before driving into the
1335:
378:
reversed, holding that the state court's conclusion was an unreasonable application of clearly established law in light of
1172:
1137:
913:
451:
Burns, Amy Knight (2011). "Insurmountable
Obstacles: Structural Errors, Procedural Default, and Ineffective Assistance".
1503:
593:
570:
1359:
1052:
348:
that he had advised Moore that, because of the abuse Rogers suffered before the shooting, Moore could be charged with
929:
838:
1565:
878:
870:
160:
Ninth
Circuit erred in finding that the state-court decision was an unreasonable application of either part of the
1967:
1454:
1247:
1025:
862:
774:
635:
122:
1997), review denied, 943 P.2d 395 (Or. 1998); state petition for relief rejected, unreported, affirmed sub nom.
360:. These facts led the state court to conclude Moore had not established ineffective assistance of counsel under
1840:
1669:
1648:
1351:
1255:
1017:
1001:
977:
782:
651:
362:
162:
1932:
1709:
1429:
1271:
1156:
1129:
1121:
961:
806:
586:
119:
398:
1613:
1383:
1303:
969:
921:
739:
142:
2008), opinion withdrawn and replaced with petitions for rehearing denied, 574 F.3d 1092 (9th Cir. 2009);
1870:
1725:
1685:
1589:
945:
814:
509:
384:
74:
822:
1960:
1749:
1693:
1581:
1573:
1375:
1228:
953:
659:
127:
1878:
1781:
1597:
1466:
1327:
1319:
1311:
1060:
798:
747:
623:
543:
453:
209:
1902:
1848:
1773:
1741:
1629:
1482:
1343:
1207:
1092:
1084:
854:
846:
701:
328:
1765:
1757:
1605:
1549:
1541:
1410:
1287:
1164:
1100:
1076:
1068:
897:
525:
487:
483:
466:
462:
349:
340:
1944:
1886:
1805:
1733:
1677:
1391:
1263:
1009:
344:
534:
1295:
1279:
1112:
937:
643:
324:
225:
201:
197:
578:
516:
425:
1821:
1789:
1557:
1044:
830:
552:
371:
353:
213:
189:
63:
1987:
1813:
1367:
985:
790:
375:
367:
295:
474:
Marceau, Justin F. (2012), "Challenging the Habeas
Process Rather than the Result",
1717:
693:
680:
321:
221:
181:
77:
233:
300:
143:
93:
89:
54:
Jeff Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State
Penitentiary v. Randy Joseph Moore
561:
139:
2014:
United States Sixth
Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel case law
331:
in exchange for the minimum sentence for that offense. He later sought
317:
357:
332:
312:
250:
Kennedy, joined by
Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor
263:
Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
135:
115:
1501:
1452:
1226:
1195:
720:
678:
621:
582:
30:
126:, 26 P.2d 191 (Or. Ct. App. 2001), rev. denied, 30 P.3d 1184 (
134:, CV-01-01795-AJB/JMS (D. Or.), reversed and remanded, 534
1948:
1999:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
406:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 562
1859:
1832:
1659:
1640:
1533:
1514:
1421:
1402:
1239:
1148:
1111:
1036:
889:
766:
731:
294:case involving the right of individuals to federal
267:
254:
246:
241:
170:
154:
110:Defendant convicted, unreported, affirmed sub nom.
106:
101:
96:
910; 79 U.S.L.W. 4038; 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 749
69:
59:
49:
42:
23:
130:2001); petition for habeas relief denied sub nom.
370:, renewing his ineffective-assistance claim. The
335:in state court, claiming that he had been denied
1968:
594:
8:
339:. Moore complained that his lawyer had not
1975:
1961:
1511:
1498:
1449:
1236:
1223:
1192:
728:
717:
675:
618:
601:
587:
579:
20:
1895:Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California
352:. That crime was punishable by death or
571:Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)
417:
2019:United States plea bargaining case law
18:2011 United States Supreme Court case
7:
2009:United States habeas corpus case law
1929:
1927:
994:Southern Union Co. v. United States
1947:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
1941:Supreme Court of the United States
1475:United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
906:Almendarez-Torres v. United States
756:Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
2024:United States Supreme Court stubs
1994:United States Supreme Court cases
1422:Restrictions on cross-examination
512:115 (2011) is available from:
1931:
29:
1523:United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez
337:effective assistance of counsel
303:, as determined by" the Court.
2004:2011 in United States case law
1336:Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
839:Rosales-Lopez v. United States
1:
610:United States Sixth Amendment
476:Washington and Lee Law Review
374:denied the petition, but the
366:(1984). Moore sought federal
1939:This article related to the
1504:Assistance of Counsel Clause
290:, 562 U.S. 115 (2011), is a
1053:Rassmussen v. United States
292:United States Supreme Court
2040:
1926:
1403:Face-to-face confrontation
1173:Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado
871:McDonnell v. United States
562:Oyez (oral argument audio)
1510:
1497:
1461:
1455:Compulsory Process Clause
1448:
1248:Reynolds v. United States
1235:
1222:
1202:
1191:
1026:Erlinger v. United States
879:United States v. Tsarnaev
863:Skilling v. United States
775:Reynolds v. United States
727:
716:
688:
674:
636:Klopfer v. North Carolina
630:
617:
272:
262:
175:
159:
28:
1841:Massiah v. United States
1670:Strickland v. Washington
1649:Glasser v. United States
1622:Nichols v. United States
1352:Bullcoming v. New Mexico
1256:Dowdell v. United States
1018:United States v. Haymond
1002:Alleyne v. United States
978:Cunningham v. California
783:Glasser v. United States
652:Doggett v. United States
363:Strickland v. Washington
45:Decided January 19, 2011
1710:Glover v. United States
1430:Chambers v. Mississippi
1272:Bruton v. United States
1240:Out-of-court statements
1157:Tanner v. United States
1149:Impeachment of verdicts
1130:Burton v. United States
1122:United States v. Dawson
962:United States v. Booker
930:Harris v. United States
807:Witherspoon v. Illinois
43:Argued October 12, 2010
1833:Uncounseled statements
1661:Ineffective assistance
1614:Pennsylvania v. Finley
1384:Samia v. United States
1304:Crawford v. Washington
1138:Smith v. United States
970:Washington v. Recuenco
922:Apprendi v. New Jersey
914:Jones v. United States
740:Cheff v. Schnackenberg
258:Ginsburg (in judgment)
1871:Faretta v. California
1726:Woodford v. Visciotti
1686:Kimmelman v. Morrison
1590:Argersinger v. Hamlin
946:Blakely v. Washington
815:Ham v. South Carolina
722:Impartial Jury Clause
399:Harrington v. Richter
385:Arizona v. Fulminante
333:postconviction relief
274:U.S. Const. amends. V
1750:Wright v. Van Patten
1694:Lockhart v. Fretwell
1582:Anders v. California
1574:Gideon v. Wainwright
1376:Hemphill v. New York
1360:Williams v. Illinois
1229:Confrontation Clause
954:Schriro v. Summerlin
660:Betterman v. Montana
382:and was contrary to
88:131 S. Ct. 733; 178
1879:McKaskle v. Wiggins
1782:Padilla v. Kentucky
1598:Gagnon v. Scarpelli
1566:Hamilton v. Alabama
1467:Washington v. Texas
1328:Giles v. California
1320:Whorton v. Bockting
1312:Davis v. Washington
1061:Williams v. Florida
799:Sheppard v. Maxwell
748:Duncan v. Louisiana
624:Speedy Trial Clause
454:Stanford Law Review
210:Ruth Bader Ginsburg
1903:Indiana v. Edwards
1849:Brewer v. Williams
1774:Porter v. McCollum
1742:Holland v. Jackson
1702:Williams v. Taylor
1630:Alabama v. Shelton
1483:Taylor v. Illinois
1344:Michigan v. Bryant
1208:Rabe v. Washington
1197:Information Clause
1093:Ramos v. Louisiana
1085:Burch v. Louisiana
1037:Size and unanimity
855:Morgan v. Illinois
847:Wainwright v. Witt
702:Presley v. Georgia
320:, Moore agreed to
186:Associate Justices
124:Moore v. Palmateer
1956:
1955:
1921:
1920:
1917:
1916:
1913:
1912:
1766:Wong v. Belmontes
1758:Bobby v. Van Hook
1606:Scott v. Illinois
1550:Johnson v. Zerbst
1542:Powell v. Alabama
1493:
1492:
1444:
1443:
1440:
1439:
1411:Maryland v. Craig
1288:Illinois v. Allen
1218:
1217:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1165:Warger v. Shauers
1101:Edwards v. Vannoy
1077:Ballew v. Georgia
1069:Apodaca v. Oregon
898:Walton v. Arizona
712:
711:
670:
669:
428:. Law.cornell.edu
350:aggravated murder
341:moved to suppress
283:
282:
146:granted sub nom.
132:Moore v. Czerniak
2031:
1977:
1970:
1963:
1935:
1928:
1887:Rock v. Arkansas
1806:Lafler v. Cooper
1734:Wiggins v. Smith
1678:Nix v. Whiteside
1512:
1499:
1450:
1392:Smith v. Arizona
1264:Pointer v. Texas
1237:
1224:
1193:
1010:Hurst v. Florida
823:Ristaino v. Ross
729:
718:
676:
619:
603:
596:
589:
580:
575:
569:
566:
560:
557:
551:
548:
542:
539:
533:
530:
524:
521:
515:
490:
470:
438:
437:
435:
433:
426:"Premo V. Moore"
422:
171:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
2039:
2038:
2034:
2033:
2032:
2030:
2029:
2028:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1924:
1922:
1909:
1855:
1828:
1655:
1636:
1529:
1506:
1489:
1457:
1436:
1417:
1398:
1296:Ohio v. Roberts
1280:Frazier v. Cupp
1231:
1214:
1198:
1179:
1144:
1113:Vicinage Clause
1107:
1032:
938:Ring v. Arizona
885:
762:
723:
708:
684:
666:
644:Barker v. Wingo
626:
613:
607:
573:
567:
564:
558:
555:
549:
546:
540:
537:
531:
528:
522:
519:
513:
497:
473:
450:
447:
445:Further reading
442:
441:
431:
429:
424:
423:
419:
414:
394:
309:
226:Sonia Sotomayor
224:
212:
202:Clarence Thomas
200:
198:Anthony Kennedy
97:
44:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
2037:
2035:
2027:
2026:
2021:
2016:
2011:
2006:
2001:
1996:
1986:
1985:
1980:
1979:
1972:
1965:
1957:
1954:
1953:
1936:
1919:
1918:
1915:
1914:
1911:
1910:
1908:
1907:
1899:
1891:
1883:
1875:
1866:
1864:
1863:representation
1857:
1856:
1854:
1853:
1845:
1836:
1834:
1830:
1829:
1827:
1826:
1822:Garza v. Idaho
1818:
1810:
1802:
1798:Premo v. Moore
1794:
1790:Sears v. Upton
1786:
1778:
1770:
1762:
1754:
1746:
1738:
1730:
1722:
1714:
1706:
1698:
1690:
1682:
1674:
1665:
1663:
1657:
1656:
1654:
1653:
1644:
1642:
1638:
1637:
1635:
1634:
1626:
1618:
1610:
1602:
1594:
1586:
1578:
1570:
1562:
1558:Betts v. Brady
1554:
1546:
1537:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1528:
1527:
1518:
1516:
1508:
1507:
1502:
1495:
1494:
1491:
1490:
1488:
1487:
1479:
1471:
1462:
1459:
1458:
1453:
1446:
1445:
1442:
1441:
1438:
1437:
1435:
1434:
1425:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1416:
1415:
1406:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1397:
1396:
1388:
1380:
1372:
1364:
1356:
1348:
1340:
1332:
1324:
1316:
1308:
1300:
1292:
1284:
1276:
1268:
1260:
1252:
1243:
1241:
1233:
1232:
1227:
1220:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1213:
1212:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1196:
1189:
1188:
1185:
1184:
1181:
1180:
1178:
1177:
1169:
1161:
1152:
1150:
1146:
1145:
1143:
1142:
1134:
1126:
1117:
1115:
1109:
1108:
1106:
1105:
1097:
1089:
1081:
1073:
1065:
1057:
1049:
1045:Maxwell v. Dow
1040:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1030:
1022:
1014:
1006:
998:
990:
982:
974:
966:
958:
950:
942:
934:
926:
918:
910:
902:
893:
891:
887:
886:
884:
883:
875:
867:
859:
851:
843:
835:
831:Adams v. Texas
827:
819:
811:
803:
795:
787:
779:
770:
768:
764:
763:
761:
760:
752:
744:
735:
733:
725:
724:
721:
714:
713:
710:
709:
707:
706:
698:
689:
686:
685:
679:
672:
671:
668:
667:
665:
664:
656:
648:
640:
631:
628:
627:
622:
615:
614:
608:
606:
605:
598:
591:
583:
577:
576:
544:Google Scholar
502:Premo v. Moore
496:
495:External links
493:
492:
491:
471:
446:
443:
440:
439:
416:
415:
413:
410:
409:
408:
403:
393:
390:
372:District Court
354:life in prison
308:
305:
287:Premo v. Moore
281:
280:
270:
269:
265:
264:
260:
259:
256:
252:
251:
248:
244:
243:
239:
238:
237:
236:
214:Stephen Breyer
190:Antonin Scalia
187:
184:
179:
173:
172:
168:
167:
157:
156:
152:
151:
148:Premo v. Moore
112:State v. Moore
108:
104:
103:
99:
98:
87:
71:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
24:Premo v. Moore
17:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2036:
2025:
2022:
2020:
2017:
2015:
2012:
2010:
2007:
2005:
2002:
2000:
1997:
1995:
1992:
1991:
1989:
1978:
1973:
1971:
1966:
1964:
1959:
1958:
1952:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1937:
1934:
1930:
1925:
1905:
1904:
1900:
1897:
1896:
1892:
1889:
1888:
1884:
1881:
1880:
1876:
1873:
1872:
1868:
1867:
1865:
1862:
1858:
1851:
1850:
1846:
1843:
1842:
1838:
1837:
1835:
1831:
1824:
1823:
1819:
1816:
1815:
1814:Buck v. Davis
1811:
1808:
1807:
1803:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1792:
1791:
1787:
1784:
1783:
1779:
1776:
1775:
1771:
1768:
1767:
1763:
1760:
1759:
1755:
1752:
1751:
1747:
1744:
1743:
1739:
1736:
1735:
1731:
1728:
1727:
1723:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1712:
1711:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1699:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1688:
1687:
1683:
1680:
1679:
1675:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1666:
1664:
1662:
1658:
1651:
1650:
1646:
1645:
1643:
1641:Conflict-free
1639:
1632:
1631:
1627:
1624:
1623:
1619:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1603:
1600:
1599:
1595:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1584:
1583:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1571:
1568:
1567:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1547:
1544:
1543:
1539:
1538:
1536:
1532:
1525:
1524:
1520:
1519:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1500:
1496:
1485:
1484:
1480:
1477:
1476:
1472:
1469:
1468:
1464:
1463:
1460:
1456:
1451:
1447:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1426:
1424:
1420:
1413:
1412:
1408:
1407:
1405:
1401:
1394:
1393:
1389:
1386:
1385:
1381:
1378:
1377:
1373:
1370:
1369:
1368:Ohio v. Clark
1365:
1362:
1361:
1357:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1330:
1329:
1325:
1322:
1321:
1317:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1285:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1225:
1221:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1194:
1190:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1147:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1124:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1116:
1114:
1110:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1087:
1086:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1050:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1039:
1035:
1028:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1007:
1004:
1003:
999:
996:
995:
991:
988:
987:
986:Oregon v. Ice
983:
980:
979:
975:
972:
971:
967:
964:
963:
959:
956:
955:
951:
948:
947:
943:
940:
939:
935:
932:
931:
927:
924:
923:
919:
916:
915:
911:
908:
907:
903:
900:
899:
895:
894:
892:
888:
881:
880:
876:
873:
872:
868:
865:
864:
860:
857:
856:
852:
849:
848:
844:
841:
840:
836:
833:
832:
828:
825:
824:
820:
817:
816:
812:
809:
808:
804:
801:
800:
796:
793:
792:
791:Irvin v. Dowd
788:
785:
784:
780:
777:
776:
772:
771:
769:
765:
758:
757:
753:
750:
749:
745:
742:
741:
737:
736:
734:
730:
726:
719:
715:
704:
703:
699:
696:
695:
691:
690:
687:
682:
677:
673:
662:
661:
657:
654:
653:
649:
646:
645:
641:
638:
637:
633:
632:
629:
625:
620:
616:
611:
604:
599:
597:
592:
590:
585:
584:
581:
572:
563:
554:
545:
536:
527:
526:CourtListener
518:
511:
507:
503:
499:
498:
494:
489:
485:
481:
477:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
455:
449:
448:
444:
427:
421:
418:
411:
407:
404:
401:
400:
396:
395:
391:
389:
387:
386:
381:
377:
376:Ninth Circuit
373:
369:
368:habeas relief
365:
364:
359:
355:
351:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
329:felony murder
326:
323:
319:
314:
306:
304:
302:
297:
296:habeas corpus
293:
289:
288:
279:
275:
271:
266:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
242:Case opinions
240:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
183:
180:
178:Chief Justice
177:
176:
174:
169:
165:
164:
158:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
95:
91:
85:
84:
79:
76:
72:
68:
65:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1949:expanding it
1938:
1923:
1901:
1893:
1885:
1877:
1869:
1847:
1839:
1820:
1812:
1804:
1797:
1796:
1788:
1780:
1772:
1764:
1756:
1748:
1740:
1732:
1724:
1718:Bell v. Cone
1716:
1708:
1700:
1692:
1684:
1676:
1668:
1647:
1628:
1620:
1612:
1604:
1596:
1588:
1580:
1572:
1564:
1556:
1548:
1540:
1521:
1481:
1473:
1465:
1428:
1409:
1390:
1382:
1374:
1366:
1358:
1350:
1342:
1334:
1326:
1318:
1310:
1302:
1294:
1286:
1278:
1270:
1262:
1254:
1246:
1206:
1171:
1163:
1155:
1136:
1133:(1905, 1906)
1128:
1120:
1099:
1091:
1083:
1075:
1067:
1059:
1051:
1043:
1024:
1016:
1008:
1000:
992:
984:
976:
968:
960:
952:
944:
936:
928:
920:
912:
904:
896:
877:
869:
861:
853:
845:
837:
829:
821:
813:
805:
797:
789:
781:
773:
767:Impartiality
754:
746:
738:
732:Availability
700:
694:In re Oliver
692:
681:Public Trial
658:
650:
642:
634:
501:
479:
475:
458:
452:
430:. Retrieved
420:
397:
383:
379:
361:
310:
286:
285:
284:
268:Laws applied
229:
222:Samuel Alito
217:
205:
193:
182:John Roberts
161:
150:559 U.S. ___
147:
131:
123:
120:Or. Ct. App.
111:
102:Case history
81:
53:
15:
1534:Appointment
890:Facts found
301:federal law
255:Concurrence
234:Elena Kagan
1988:Categories
412:References
380:Strickland
345:confession
325:no contest
307:Background
163:Strickland
144:certiorari
94:U.S. LEXIS
92:649; 2011
60:Docket no.
90:L. Ed. 2d
70:Citations
612:case law
500:Text of
392:See also
388:(1991).
356:without
247:Majority
140:9th Cir.
535:Findlaw
517:Cornell
488:1956629
467:1848068
318:counsel
155:Holding
1906:(2008)
1898:(2000)
1890:(1987)
1882:(1984)
1874:(1975)
1861:Pro se
1852:(1977)
1844:(1963)
1825:(2019)
1817:(2017)
1809:(2012)
1801:(2011)
1793:(2010)
1785:(2010)
1777:(2009)
1769:(2009)
1761:(2009)
1753:(2008)
1745:(2004)
1737:(2003)
1729:(2002)
1721:(2002)
1713:(2001)
1705:(2000)
1697:(1993)
1689:(1986)
1681:(1986)
1673:(1984)
1652:(1942)
1633:(2002)
1625:(1994)
1617:(1987)
1609:(1979)
1601:(1973)
1593:(1972)
1585:(1967)
1577:(1963)
1569:(1961)
1561:(1942)
1553:(1938)
1545:(1932)
1526:(2006)
1515:Choice
1486:(1988)
1478:(1982)
1470:(1967)
1433:(1973)
1414:(1990)
1395:(2024)
1387:(2023)
1379:(2022)
1371:(2015)
1363:(2012)
1355:(2011)
1347:(2011)
1339:(2009)
1331:(2008)
1323:(2007)
1315:(2006)
1307:(2004)
1299:(1980)
1291:(1970)
1283:(1969)
1275:(1968)
1267:(1965)
1259:(1911)
1251:(1878)
1211:(1972)
1176:(2017)
1168:(2014)
1160:(1987)
1141:(2023)
1125:(1853)
1104:(2021)
1096:(2020)
1088:(1979)
1080:(1978)
1072:(1972)
1064:(1970)
1056:(1905)
1048:(1900)
1029:(2024)
1021:(2019)
1013:(2016)
1005:(2013)
997:(2012)
989:(2009)
981:(2007)
973:(2006)
965:(2005)
957:(2004)
949:(2004)
941:(2002)
933:(2002)
925:(2000)
917:(1999)
909:(1998)
901:(1990)
882:(2022)
874:(2016)
866:(2010)
858:(1992)
850:(1985)
842:(1981)
834:(1980)
826:(1976)
818:(1973)
810:(1968)
802:(1966)
794:(1961)
786:(1942)
778:(1878)
759:(1989)
751:(1968)
743:(1966)
705:(2010)
697:(1948)
683:Clause
663:(2016)
655:(1992)
647:(1972)
639:(1967)
574:
568:
565:
559:
556:
553:Justia
550:
547:
541:
538:
532:
529:
523:
520:
514:
486:
465:
432:May 9,
402:(2010)
358:parole
313:Oregon
232:
230:·
228:
220:
218:·
216:
208:
206:·
204:
196:
194:·
192:
138:1128 (
114:, 951
64:09-658
1943:is a
508:
322:plead
166:rule.
118:204 (
107:Prior
1945:stub
510:U.S.
484:SSRN
463:SSRN
434:2022
343:his
136:F.3d
116:P.2d
83:more
75:U.S.
73:562
506:562
327:to
128:Or.
78:115
1990::
504:,
482:,
480:69
478:,
461:.
459:64
457:.
278:VI
276:,
1976:e
1969:t
1962:v
1951:.
602:e
595:t
588:v
469:.
436:.
86:)
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.