Knowledge (XXG)

Present bias

Source đź“ť

252:. Political elections are usually characterized by an immediate effort, for example making a political decision and casting the vote on election day, whereas the benefits of voting, such as favored political changes, often only occur later in the future. Patience is therefore a relevant factor that influences peoples’ decision whether to take part in elections. Individuals who exhibit more patience with future political changes, also show a greater willingness to take part in political elections. Whereas others, who focus more on the efforts to be paid, are less likely to take part in elections. 445:. Loss of wealth can be attributed to tendency to bend under the temptation to over-consume and under-save. Such irrational behavioral biases lead to lower average wealth and shortened planning horizons. Present-biased people fail to complete a consumption saving plan are more likely consistently re-optimize factors influencing their wealth accumulation. An association between deciding to obtain less education, lower lifetime earnings, and lower retirement consumption was observed in present-biased individuals. 81:, thus time consistent discounting. However, later research led to the conclusion that time preferences were indeed not consistent, but inconsistent. In other words, people were found to prefer immediate advantages to future advantages in that their discount over a short period of time falls rapidly, while falling less the more the rewards are in the future. Therefore, people are biased towards the present. As a result, Phelps and Pollak introduced the quasi-hyperbolic model in 1968. In 384:. People tend to forget that precaution with their own health can maximize their lifetime and minimize their life time medical spending. A lot of people who are already diagnosed with an illness underestimate the importance of following health care guidelines, even though they are beneficial for their own health. Mostly, increasing age and nearing death eventually leads individuals to focus more on their own health. 160:
The ventral striatum gets activated both when an individual personally decides for an immediate reward, as well as when an individual watches someone else making that decision for them. It is responsive to both the likelihood of getting an anticipated reward as well as its size. It also plays a role
376:
The lacking adherence to health care can also be explained by the naĂŻve thinking about one's own present bias. People overestimate that they will take care of their behaviour's consequences in the future, which is often not the case. They tend to underestimate their own self-control and the effects
135:
The medial prefrontal cortex, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and ventral striatum show different activity patterns, depending on whether the choices lead to an immediate reward or a future reward for oneself. This is not the case if these decisions affect another individual, which implies that
104:
Brain areas that are associated with emotion- and reward-processing, are much rather activated by the availability of immediate rewards than by future rewards, even if the future rewards are larger. Hence individuals tend to make decisions in favor of immediate outcomes rather than future outcomes.
420:
Those factors are known as "hot states", because temporary emotions can have an influential effect on our behavior. Therefore, there are "cooling off" periods for many important purchases. Other factors such as age, gender, cultural background, education and self-control also play a role in making
437:
would be unaffected. As this is only possible in an ideal economy, wealth inequality spurts from time-consistent individuals benefiting from the irrational monetary decisions present-biased economic rivals make. Indeed, present bias in economics is often linked to lack of self-control when making
232:
and Ebbe B. Ebbesen in 1970. It led to a series of Marshmallow Experiments, which all tested children's ability to delay gratification. The children were offered an immediate reward and were told that if they manage to not eat the reward right away, but instead waited for a certain period of time
372:
Present biased decision-making often underlies the notion that a certain health care behavior induces costs first, while benefits occur only quite some time later. People are often more focused on the short-term benefits than on long-term consequences. For example, drunk-drivers exhibit less
387:
Overcoming the present bias could lead to earlier detection of illnesses, such as breast cancer, to start treatment in time. These individual decisions not to take care early negatively affects the health care systems, whose costs could be minimized by a more precaution of their clients.
131:
claims that these brain areas are impulsively triggered by immediate benefits and not so much by future rewards. Future rewards do not activate emotion- and reward-processing areas as much, because people tend to downgrade future benefits in respect of available immediate benefits.
22:
is the tendency to settle for a smaller present reward rather than wait for a larger future reward, in a trade-off situation. It describes the trend of overvaluing immediate rewards, while putting less worth in long-term consequences. The present bias can be used as a measure for
177:, for example comparing the self to someone else. These evaluations take place even if the individual has not made the choice themselves. The ventral part of the medial prefrontal cortex, just like the ventral striatum, evaluates the outcome also after the decision was made. 457:
of tourist's decision-making. Impulsivity is reasoned to be triggered by the escape of daily routines and a feeling of the moment. Hence present bias would specially apply while traveling. Although reference prices frame expenses, present bias which is influenced by the
143:
Activity in the ventral striatum, medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and posterior cingulate cortex is associated with an immediate reward merely being available for oneself. All these areas, which are also part of the
291:
The findings of a study in which students had to set deadlines for completing certain tasks for themselves, suggested that an interaction of present-bias as well as personal characteristics, e.g. overconfidence, may appear to be "procrastination". However, internal
413:. Visceral factors lead one to focus on the present more than on some time in the future when making decisions that are associated with the visceral factor. In Loewenstein's opinion, visceral states have the most enormous impact on the following behaviors: 151:
The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus get activated more if the rewards is immediate and less when the reward is available in the future, regardless of whether it affects the individual itself or another person.
304:
Another study further investigates the common hypothesis that self-regulatory failure results in procrastination. Furthermore, there appears to be a decrease in functional correspondence between the following brain areas: Between
69:"Do not put your work off till to-morrow and the day after; for a sluggish worker does not fill his barn, nor one who puts off his work: industry makes work go well, but a man who puts off work is always at hand-grips with ruin." 377:
of their present behavior on their future well-being and therefore postpone taking action before it is urgent. Many people procrastinate because they underestimate how their future selves are being affected by the present bias.
360:
Present bias often occurs when the negative consequences of a certain behavior are believed to be in distant future. It is characterized by short-term impatience. This impatience with the future benefits to occur minimizes the
404:
states (e.g. hunger, thirst, strong emotions, sexual desire, mood or physical pain) can influence decision-making in ways that are not in one's long-term interest. According to Loewenstein, visceral factors have a direct
287:
Procrastination mostly occurs when actions are followed by immediate costs. However, when actions are instead followed by immediate rewards, people tend to perform their tasks faster in order to get the reward.
88:
Only when the preference for the present is time inconsistent do we call it biased. In recent years, the concept of present bias has also found its way into research concerning law and criminal justice.
462:, that grades the value of gains, and the attachment effect, tourists tend to overspend. Individual differences such as risk aversiveness play into overspending caused by the effect of present bias. 140:
and less self-focus is involved in self-irrelevant decision-making. People who consider their present and future self as more alike also exhibit more patience when choosing a reward.
77:
The term of present bias was coined in the second half of the 20th century. In the 1930s economic research started investigating time preferences. The findings led to the model of
409:
impact and they influence how much one desires different rewards and actions. When visceral factors influence one highly, it can lead to self-destructive behavior such as
1814: 325:. They posited that self-regulatory failure is associated with procrastination, although a body of replicated results would lend more credibility to this hypothesis. 237:. There has also been a correlation found between ability to delay gratification as a child and the child's success in follow-up studies several years later. 124:
on the other hand is only responsive to the presence of an immediate reward. All these areas are associated with activity in response to an immediate reward.
1789: 641:
Delaney L, Lades LK (2017). "Present Bias and Everyday Self-Control Failures: A Day Reconstruction Study: Present Bias and Everyday Self-Control Failures".
878:
Drobetz R, Hänggi J, Maercker A, Kaufmann K, Jäncke L, Forstmeier S (April 2014). "Structural brain correlates of delay of gratification in the elderly".
441:
A present-biased society is represented by individuals reaching an earlier peak in their mean wealth and trend to lose accumulated wealth as they reach
1819: 1068:
Wu Y, Li L, Yuan B, Tian X (June 2016). "Individual differences in resting-state functional connectivity predict procrastination".
1216: 1927: 1922: 1809: 1619: 698: 505: 268:
shows increased activity during delayed gratification. The thickness of these cortical areas as well as the volume of the left
221: 97:
Decisions concerning the choice between an immediate or a future reward are mediated by two separate systems, one dealing with
306: 265: 1738: 1168:"Linking loss aversion and present bias with overspending behavior of tourists: Insights from a lab-in-the-field experiment" 1912: 1624: 1278: 1273: 1396: 296:
and sophistication regarding the tasks may reduce present bias, whereas it has the opposite effect for naĂŻve people.
1732: 1258: 1364: 1917: 1862: 1586: 1386: 261: 121: 1891: 1886: 1799: 1681: 1446: 1426: 1322: 480: 109: 438:
monetary decisions. It is associated with high desires to spend money and failure to commit to a saving plan.
212:
is the ability to not give in to immediate rewards and instead strive for the more beneficial future rewards.
1099: 78: 337:. It affects a range of health-related behaviors, for example precaution with potential illnesses, such as 233:(approximately 15 minutes), they would get another treat. Age correlated positively with the capability of 1872: 1556: 1536: 1317: 1295: 490: 434: 35: 1651: 1566: 1541: 1486: 742: 500: 463: 430: 234: 209: 1604: 1456: 1332: 1209: 827: 525: 485: 113: 31: 108:
The brain areas involved in present-biased decisions can be dissociated into three main groups. The
1759: 1676: 1576: 1511: 1451: 1441: 1436: 1300: 365:
for people to take unpleasant actions for their health, like maintaining a diet, refraining from a
225: 1656: 1641: 1401: 1391: 1374: 1119: 1048: 1026: 1018: 978: 930: 397: 128: 953:
Fowler JH, Kam CD (2006). "Patience as a Political Virtue: Delayed Gratification and Turnout".
1769: 1706: 1691: 1614: 1596: 1531: 1327: 1243: 970: 895: 855: 596: 816:"What do I want and when do I want it: brain correlates of decisions made for self and other" 272:
is also linked to a better ability in delayed gratification and suppressing impulsivity. The
1836: 1696: 1636: 1561: 1546: 1406: 1359: 1268: 1263: 1248: 1179: 1111: 1077: 1010: 962: 922: 887: 845: 835: 728: 680: 650: 586: 578: 421:
discounting decisions – but those can be dealt with more easily than with visceral states.
1804: 1794: 1571: 1551: 1466: 1369: 1344: 1339: 1312: 1290: 1202: 755: 495: 459: 401: 334: 318: 269: 186: 59: 831: 148:, build a network connected to the expectation and the gain of immediate gratification. 1846: 1841: 1831: 1754: 1671: 1631: 1581: 1526: 1516: 1501: 1496: 1461: 1416: 1381: 1285: 1234: 850: 815: 591: 566: 475: 346: 229: 55: 245:
Present bias is also reflected in the choice of whether an individual participates in
1906: 1784: 1764: 1727: 1701: 1686: 1666: 1646: 1609: 1521: 1481: 1476: 1471: 1349: 1253: 466:
and a prior commitment to not overspend can reduce the bias and inhibit impulsivity.
380:
Present bias can explain failure to adhere effective health care guidelines, such as
354: 338: 145: 51: 934: 1744: 1491: 1030: 982: 293: 273: 24: 1184: 1167: 1123: 840: 671:
O'Donoghue T, Rabin M (2015). "Present Bias: Lessons Learned and To Be Learned".
620: 1661: 1431: 1421: 1411: 1307: 454: 381: 98: 1081: 725:"How Soon Is Now? Evidence of Present Bias from Convex Time Budget Experiments" 1779: 1774: 1749: 1142: 966: 582: 442: 410: 362: 189:, which plays a role in positive emotions and responds to success reward when 116:
respond to both the presence and the gain of an immediate reward, whereas the
974: 913:
Mischel W, Ebbesen EB (October 1970). "Attention in delay of gratification".
276:
involvement in self-regulation and self-control also play an important role.
1867: 1354: 414: 366: 185:
The pregenual anterior cingulate cortex is a structure located close to the
174: 170: 82: 1115: 899: 859: 600: 684: 433:, to explain distribution of wealth. If everybody would be present-biased 201:
This brain area is playing a role in reflection on the self and emotions.
1826: 1711: 1014: 406: 249: 246: 190: 137: 117: 814:
Albrecht K, Volz KG, Sutter M, von Cramon DY (2013). Avenanti A (ed.).
342: 1022: 27:, which is a trait related to the prediction of secure life outcomes. 926: 891: 654: 63: 1049:"Present-Bias, Procrastination and Deadlines in a Field Experiment" 733: 724: 699:"Procrastination Through the Ages: A Brief History of Wasting Time" 322: 310: 453:
Present bias plays a role in tourism concerning travel costs and
1225: 350: 314: 47: 1198: 264:
and the medial prefrontal cortex mature. Particularly the left
50:
was not introduced until the 1950s, the core idea of immediate
333:
Present bias has an impact on people's individual health care
260:
The ability to perform delayed gratification increases as the
169:
The medial prefrontal cortex is responsible for self-related
417:, sexual behavior, motivation and effort, and self-control. 284:
Present-biased preferences often result in procrastination.
120:
is sensitive to the availability and gain of a reward. The
1194: 429:
Economical models use present bias, also referred to as
58:. A historical record of a display of concern regarding 1001:
O'Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999). "Doing It Now or Later".
1104:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
772:
McAdams RH (2011). "Present Bias and Criminal Law".
369:
or regularly visiting a professional for check-ups.
85:, present bias is therefore a model of discounting. 1855: 1720: 1595: 1232: 1093: 1091: 1100:"Out of Control: Visceral Influences on Behavior" 723:Balakrishnan U, Haushofer J, Jakiela P (2017). 1210: 8: 915:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 161:in evaluating after a choice has been made. 101:decisions and the other with self-control. 1873:Heuristics in judgment and decision-making 1217: 1203: 1195: 1063: 1061: 373:long-term concern than non-drunk drivers. 1183: 849: 839: 732: 590: 353:use and showing risky behavior, such as 516: 341:, living an unhealthy life style, like 1070:Personality and Individual Differences 809: 807: 805: 803: 751: 740: 1137: 1135: 1133: 1042: 1040: 996: 994: 992: 948: 946: 944: 873: 871: 869: 801: 799: 797: 795: 793: 791: 789: 787: 785: 783: 643:Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 560: 558: 7: 767: 765: 666: 664: 636: 634: 614: 612: 610: 556: 554: 552: 550: 548: 546: 544: 542: 540: 538: 38:, which differ in time consistency. 181:Pregenual anterior cingulate cortex 122:pregenual anterior cingulate cortex 197:Ventral posterior cingulate cortex 14: 774:University of Illinois Law Review 565:Wang Y, Sloan FA (October 2018). 46:Even though the term of present 571:Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 506:Stanford marshmallow experiment 216:Stanford Marshmallow Experiment 266:dorsolateral prefrontal cortex 1: 1185:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.019 62:is known from the Greek poet 34:, present bias is related to 1098:Loewenstein G (March 1996). 1003:The American Economic Review 841:10.1371/journal.pone.0073531 1739:DĂ©formation professionnelle 396:The educator and economist 114:medial orbitofrontal cortex 1944: 1733:Basking in reflected glory 1082:10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.016 73:Present bias and economics 1881: 1863:Cognitive bias mitigation 967:10.1007/s11109-006-9004-7 583:10.1007/s11166-018-9289-z 567:"Present bias and health" 262:lateral prefrontal cortex 54:was already addressed in 1447:Illusion of transparency 673:American Economic Review 481:List of cognitive biases 165:Medial prefrontal cortex 110:medial prefrontal cortex 880:Behavioral Neuroscience 621:"What is present bias?" 400:described how strongly 79:exponential discounting 1928:Psychology experiments 1923:Cognitive neuroscience 1166:Nguyen Q (June 2016). 1147:Tristan J. Nighswander 1116:10.1006/obhd.1996.0028 750:Cite journal requires 491:Hyperbolic discounting 222:Marshmallow Experiment 36:hyperbolic discounting 1815:Arab–Israeli conflict 1542:Social influence bias 1487:Out-group homogeneity 685:10.1257/aer.p20151085 501:Delayed gratification 431:dynamic inconsistency 235:delayed gratification 210:Delayed gratification 205:Delayed gratification 146:rostral limbic system 1913:Behavioral economics 1457:Mere-exposure effect 1387:Extrinsic incentives 1333:Selective perception 1047:Bisin A, Hyndman K. 1015:10.1257/aer.89.1.103 486:Behavioral economics 32:behavioral economics 16:Behaviorial tendency 1682:Social desirability 1577:von Restorff effect 1452:Mean world syndrome 1427:Hostile attribution 832:2013PLoSO...873531A 435:wealth distribution 425:Wealth distribution 241:Political elections 226:Stanford University 1597:Statistical biases 1375:Curse of knowledge 1178:(152–9): 152–159. 1172:Tourism Management 955:Political Behavior 398:George Loewenstein 1900: 1899: 1537:Social comparison 1318:Choice-supportive 727:. Cambridge, MA. 321:and in the right 224:was conducted at 129:dual-system model 1935: 1918:Cognitive biases 1697:Systematic error 1652:Omitted-variable 1567:Trait ascription 1407:Frog pond effect 1235:Cognitive biases 1219: 1212: 1205: 1196: 1190: 1189: 1187: 1163: 1157: 1156: 1154: 1153: 1139: 1128: 1127: 1095: 1086: 1085: 1065: 1056: 1055: 1053: 1044: 1035: 1034: 998: 987: 986: 950: 939: 938: 927:10.1037/h0029815 910: 904: 903: 892:10.1037/a0036208 875: 864: 863: 853: 843: 811: 778: 777: 769: 760: 759: 753: 748: 746: 738: 736: 720: 714: 713: 711: 710: 695: 689: 688: 668: 659: 658: 655:10.1002/bdm.2031 649:(5): 1157–1167. 638: 629: 628: 616: 605: 604: 594: 562: 533: 532: 530: 521: 156:Ventral striatum 118:ventral striatum 30:In the field of 1943: 1942: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1896: 1877: 1851: 1716: 1591: 1572:Turkey illusion 1340:Compassion fade 1237: 1228: 1223: 1193: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1151: 1149: 1141: 1140: 1131: 1097: 1096: 1089: 1067: 1066: 1059: 1051: 1046: 1045: 1038: 1000: 999: 990: 952: 951: 942: 912: 911: 907: 877: 876: 867: 813: 812: 781: 771: 770: 763: 749: 739: 722: 721: 717: 708: 706: 703:mentalfloss.com 697: 696: 692: 670: 669: 662: 640: 639: 632: 618: 617: 608: 564: 563: 536: 528: 524:Chakraborty A. 523: 522: 518: 514: 496:Procrastination 472: 464:Group decisions 460:prospect theory 451: 427: 394: 392:Visceral states 335:decision-making 331: 302: 282: 280:Procrastination 270:caudate nucleus 258: 243: 218: 207: 199: 187:corpus callosum 183: 167: 158: 95: 75: 60:procrastination 44: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1941: 1939: 1931: 1930: 1925: 1920: 1915: 1905: 1904: 1898: 1897: 1895: 1894: 1889: 1882: 1879: 1878: 1876: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1859: 1857: 1856:Bias reduction 1853: 1852: 1850: 1849: 1844: 1839: 1834: 1832:Political bias 1829: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1760:Infrastructure 1757: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1735: 1730: 1724: 1722: 1718: 1717: 1715: 1714: 1709: 1704: 1699: 1694: 1689: 1684: 1679: 1677:Self-selection 1674: 1669: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1644: 1639: 1634: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1617: 1612: 1607: 1601: 1599: 1593: 1592: 1590: 1589: 1584: 1579: 1574: 1569: 1564: 1559: 1554: 1549: 1544: 1539: 1534: 1529: 1524: 1519: 1514: 1512:Pro-innovation 1509: 1504: 1499: 1497:Overton window 1494: 1489: 1484: 1479: 1474: 1469: 1464: 1459: 1454: 1449: 1444: 1439: 1434: 1429: 1424: 1419: 1414: 1409: 1404: 1399: 1394: 1389: 1384: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1367: 1365:Dunning–Kruger 1362: 1357: 1352: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1325: 1320: 1315: 1310: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1293: 1288: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1279:Correspondence 1276: 1274:Actor–observer 1266: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1240: 1238: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1224: 1222: 1221: 1214: 1207: 1199: 1192: 1191: 1158: 1129: 1110:(3): 272–292. 1087: 1057: 1036: 1009:(1): 103–124. 988: 961:(2): 113–128. 940: 905: 865: 779: 761: 752:|journal= 734:10.3386/w23558 715: 690: 679:(5): 273–279. 660: 630: 606: 577:(2): 177–198. 534: 526:"Present Bias" 515: 513: 510: 509: 508: 503: 498: 493: 488: 483: 478: 476:Cognitive bias 471: 468: 450: 447: 426: 423: 415:drug addiction 393: 390: 330: 327: 301: 298: 281: 278: 274:frontal cortex 257: 254: 242: 239: 230:Walter Mischel 217: 214: 206: 203: 198: 195: 182: 179: 166: 163: 157: 154: 94: 91: 74: 71: 56:Ancient Greece 43: 40: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1940: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1919: 1916: 1914: 1911: 1910: 1908: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1884: 1883: 1880: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1858: 1854: 1848: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1835: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1821: 1818: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1810:United States 1808: 1806: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1796: 1793: 1791: 1788: 1786: 1785:False balance 1783: 1782: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1740: 1736: 1734: 1731: 1729: 1726: 1725: 1723: 1719: 1713: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1703: 1700: 1698: 1695: 1693: 1690: 1688: 1685: 1683: 1680: 1678: 1675: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1657:Participation 1655: 1653: 1650: 1648: 1645: 1643: 1640: 1638: 1635: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1625:Psychological 1623: 1622: 1621: 1618: 1616: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1606: 1603: 1602: 1600: 1598: 1594: 1588: 1585: 1583: 1580: 1578: 1575: 1573: 1570: 1568: 1565: 1563: 1560: 1558: 1555: 1553: 1550: 1548: 1545: 1543: 1540: 1538: 1535: 1533: 1530: 1528: 1525: 1523: 1520: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1510: 1508: 1505: 1503: 1500: 1498: 1495: 1493: 1490: 1488: 1485: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1465: 1463: 1460: 1458: 1455: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1440: 1438: 1435: 1433: 1430: 1428: 1425: 1423: 1420: 1418: 1415: 1413: 1410: 1408: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1398: 1395: 1393: 1392:Fading affect 1390: 1388: 1385: 1383: 1380: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1363: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1316: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1294: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1231: 1227: 1220: 1215: 1213: 1208: 1206: 1201: 1200: 1197: 1186: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1162: 1159: 1148: 1144: 1138: 1136: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1094: 1092: 1088: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1064: 1062: 1058: 1050: 1043: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 997: 995: 993: 989: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 949: 947: 945: 941: 936: 932: 928: 924: 920: 916: 909: 906: 901: 897: 893: 889: 886:(2): 134–45. 885: 881: 874: 872: 870: 866: 861: 857: 852: 847: 842: 837: 833: 829: 826:(8): e73531. 825: 821: 817: 810: 808: 806: 804: 802: 800: 798: 796: 794: 792: 790: 788: 786: 784: 780: 775: 768: 766: 762: 757: 744: 735: 730: 726: 719: 716: 704: 700: 694: 691: 686: 682: 678: 674: 667: 665: 661: 656: 652: 648: 644: 637: 635: 631: 626: 625:ING eZonomics 622: 615: 613: 611: 607: 602: 598: 593: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 561: 559: 557: 555: 553: 551: 549: 547: 545: 543: 541: 539: 535: 527: 520: 517: 511: 507: 504: 502: 499: 497: 494: 492: 489: 487: 484: 482: 479: 477: 474: 473: 469: 467: 465: 461: 456: 448: 446: 444: 439: 436: 432: 424: 422: 418: 416: 412: 408: 403: 399: 391: 389: 385: 383: 378: 374: 370: 368: 364: 358: 356: 355:drunk driving 352: 348: 344: 340: 339:breast cancer 336: 328: 326: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 299: 297: 295: 289: 285: 279: 277: 275: 271: 267: 263: 255: 253: 251: 248: 240: 238: 236: 231: 227: 223: 215: 213: 211: 204: 202: 196: 194: 192: 188: 180: 178: 176: 172: 164: 162: 155: 153: 149: 147: 141: 139: 133: 130: 125: 123: 119: 115: 111: 106: 102: 100: 92: 90: 86: 84: 80: 72: 70: 67: 66:, who wrote: 65: 61: 57: 53: 52:gratification 49: 41: 39: 37: 33: 28: 26: 21: 1770:In education 1737: 1721:Other biases 1707:Verification 1692:Survivorship 1642:Non-response 1615:Healthy user 1557:Substitution 1532:Self-serving 1506: 1328:Confirmation 1296:Availability 1244:Acquiescence 1175: 1171: 1161: 1150:. Retrieved 1146: 1107: 1103: 1073: 1069: 1006: 1002: 958: 954: 918: 914: 908: 883: 879: 823: 819: 773: 743:cite journal 718: 707:. Retrieved 705:. 2015-05-11 702: 693: 676: 672: 646: 642: 624: 574: 570: 519: 452: 440: 428: 419: 395: 386: 379: 375: 371: 359: 332: 303: 294:self-control 290: 286: 283: 259: 244: 219: 208: 200: 184: 168: 159: 150: 142: 134: 126: 107: 103: 96: 87: 76: 68: 45: 29: 25:self-control 20:Present bias 19: 18: 1837:Publication 1790:Vietnam War 1637:Length time 1620:Information 1562:Time-saving 1422:Horn effect 1412:Halo effect 1360:Distinction 1269:Attribution 1264:Attentional 455:impulsivity 382:mammography 345:, drinking 300:Brain areas 256:Brain areas 93:Brain areas 1907:Categories 1800:South Asia 1775:Liking gap 1587:In animals 1552:Status quo 1467:Negativity 1370:Egocentric 1345:Congruence 1323:Commitment 1313:Blind spot 1301:Mean world 1291:Automation 1152:2019-05-14 1143:"Research" 921:(2): 329. 709:2019-05-14 512:References 443:retirement 411:overeating 363:motivation 220:The first 127:McClure's 1868:Debiasing 1847:White hat 1842:Reporting 1755:Inductive 1672:Selection 1632:Lead time 1605:Estimator 1582:Zero-risk 1547:Spotlight 1527:Restraint 1517:Proximity 1502:Precision 1462:Narrative 1417:Hindsight 1402:Frequency 1382:Emotional 1355:Declinism 1286:Authority 1259:Anchoring 1249:Ambiguity 975:0190-9320 367:cigarette 250:elections 247:political 175:judgement 171:attention 99:impulsive 83:economics 1765:Inherent 1728:Academic 1702:Systemic 1687:Spectrum 1667:Sampling 1647:Observer 1610:Forecast 1522:Response 1482:Optimism 1477:Omission 1472:Normalcy 1442:In-group 1437:Implicit 1350:Cultural 1254:Affinity 1076:: 62–7. 935:53464175 900:24773434 860:23991196 820:PLOS ONE 619:Egan M. 601:31244508 470:See also 402:visceral 191:gambling 138:patience 112:and the 1887:General 1885:Lists: 1820:Ukraine 1745:Funding 1507:Present 1492:Outcome 1397:Framing 1031:5115877 983:7921674 851:3749998 828:Bibcode 592:6594564 449:Tourism 407:hedonic 347:alcohol 343:smoking 319:caudate 42:History 1892:Memory 1805:Sweden 1795:Norway 1662:Recall 1432:Impact 1308:Belief 1226:Biases 1124:606889 1122:  1029:  1023:116981 1021:  981:  973:  933:  898:  858:  848:  599:  589:  329:Health 64:Hesiod 1780:Media 1750:FUTON 1120:S2CID 1052:(PDF) 1027:S2CID 1019:JSTOR 979:S2CID 931:S2CID 529:(PDF) 323:VLPFC 311:DLPFC 136:more 971:ISSN 896:PMID 856:PMID 756:help 597:PMID 351:drug 349:and 317:and 315:dACC 309:and 307:VMPC 173:and 48:bias 1827:Net 1712:Wet 1180:doi 1112:doi 1078:doi 1011:doi 963:doi 923:doi 888:doi 884:128 846:PMC 836:doi 729:doi 681:doi 677:105 651:doi 587:PMC 579:doi 228:by 1909:: 1176:54 1174:. 1170:. 1145:. 1132:^ 1118:. 1108:65 1106:. 1102:. 1090:^ 1074:95 1072:. 1060:^ 1039:^ 1025:. 1017:. 1007:89 1005:. 991:^ 977:. 969:. 959:28 957:. 943:^ 929:. 919:16 917:. 894:. 882:. 868:^ 854:. 844:. 834:. 822:. 818:. 782:^ 764:^ 747:: 745:}} 741:{{ 701:. 675:. 663:^ 647:30 645:. 633:^ 623:. 609:^ 595:. 585:. 575:57 573:. 569:. 537:^ 357:. 313:, 193:. 1218:e 1211:t 1204:v 1188:. 1182:: 1155:. 1126:. 1114:: 1084:. 1080:: 1054:. 1033:. 1013:: 985:. 965:: 937:. 925:: 902:. 890:: 862:. 838:: 830:: 824:8 776:. 758:) 754:( 737:. 731:: 712:. 687:. 683:: 657:. 653:: 627:. 603:. 581:: 531:.

Index

self-control
behavioral economics
hyperbolic discounting
bias
gratification
Ancient Greece
procrastination
Hesiod
exponential discounting
economics
impulsive
medial prefrontal cortex
medial orbitofrontal cortex
ventral striatum
pregenual anterior cingulate cortex
dual-system model
patience
rostral limbic system
attention
judgement
corpus callosum
gambling
Delayed gratification
Marshmallow Experiment
Stanford University
Walter Mischel
delayed gratification
political
elections
lateral prefrontal cortex

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑