535:"Notably, the more general holding in Clinton v. Jones, contrary to common belief, is not quite predicated on the conduct’s having taken place before President Clinton took office. Rather, the court distinguishes Fitzgerald on grounds that the conduct alleged in Jones's suit was not plausibly encompassed within the President's official duties. That it preceded his presidency was evidence of that reality, but it was the reality it supported that controlled the outcome. As Justice Stevens wrote, in distinguishing Fitzgerald, 'we have never suggested that the President, or any other official, has an immunity that extends beyond the scope of any action taken in an official capacity.
263:
Absolute judicial immunity applies when judges act in their judicial capacity. A judge enjoys this immunity when they exceed their jurisdiction, but not when they act without any jurisdiction. Judicial immunity also extends to non-judges when they act in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity, such as
193:
that a president enjoys absolute immunity for criminal acts conducted while in office. The next month, a three-judge panel of the court unanimously ruled against Trump. It was the first time an appeals court had addressed such a presidential immunity matter, since no other sitting or former president
207:
of immunity for other official acts, and no immunity for unofficial actions. The case was sent back to lower courts to determine which actions in the criminal complaint should be classified as official vs. unofficial. The ruling was the first time the courts granted a president criminal immunity.
286:
Some scholars urge courts to reconsider the scope of certain forms of absolute immunity, particularly prosecutorial immunity. They insist that absolute prosecutorial immunity is not supported by either public policy or history, and that applying this doctrine in everyday situations is needlessly
272:
In 2019, the Trump administration resisted efforts by House
Democrats to compel Trump aides to testify, asserting that close aides to the president enjoy absolute immunity from providing testimony to Congress. But a federal judge ruled against the administration, stating that close presidential
140:
that the president does not possess absolute immunity from civil litigation surrounding acts he carried out that were not part of his official duties (which is often incorrectly presented as referring only to acts carried out before becoming president). The 2020 Supreme Court decision in
129:
that the president enjoys absolute immunity from civil litigation for official acts undertaken while in office. The Court suggested that this immunity was broad (though not limitless), applying to acts within the "outer perimeter" of the president's official duties. Fifteen years after
264:
a court-appointed referee in an equitable distribution case. Determining whether someone is acting in a judicial capacity and thus deserves absolute immunity requires using a functional test; that is, one must determine whether the person is acting functionally similarly to a judge.
229:
that prosecutors cannot be sued for injuries caused by their official actions during trial. For instance, a prosecutor cannot be sued for purposely withholding exculpatory evidence, even if that act results in a wrongful conviction. Absolute
58:
recognized this immunity. The Court reasons that this immunity is necessary to protect public officials from excessive interference with their responsibilities and from "potentially disabling threats of liability."
277:
is appealing the decision. Previously, both
Republican and Democratic presidential administrations had asserted absolute immunity in contexts like this, but the doctrine has been mostly untested in the judiciary.
273:
advisors—even those working in national security—do not possess absolute immunity from testifying in congressional inquiries, though these officials may invoke executive privilege whenever it is appropriate. The
101:
Presidential aides who first show that the functions of their office are so sensitive as to require absolute immunity, and who then show that they were performing those functions when performing the act at
186:
237:
However, the
Supreme Court has held that prosecutors do not enjoy absolute immunity when they act as investigators by engaging in activities associated more closely with police functions. Further, the
123:
Although the U.S. president is frequently sued in his governmental capacity, he normally is not sued in his personal capacity as being personally liable. In 1982, the
Supreme Court held in
748:
246:
238:
249:
has ruled that a prosecutor is not immune from liability for fabricating evidence during pre-trial investigations and then introducing that evidence at trial.
203:, on July 1, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled that presidents were entitled to absolute immunity from exercising core powers enumerated by the constitution,
118:
562:
171:
723:
287:
unworkable. Meanwhile, others push back, arguing that prosecutorial immunity is necessary to protect public servants from frivolous lawsuits.
147:
held that the president is subject to subpoenas in criminal prosecutions for personal conduct with the same legal threshold as anyone else.
976:
818:
274:
51:
558:
631:
150:
The extent to which presidential immunity applies to criminal offenses was disputed. There are non-contemporaneous reports that
671:
749:"First Circuit: Prosecutor Not Entitled to Absolute Immunity When Performing Purely Administrative Duty | Criminal Legal News"
95:
884:
199:
190:
54:
has consistently held that government officials deserve some type of immunity from lawsuits for damages, and that the
653:
587:
532:
508:
151:
217:
242:
31:
909:
851:
981:
885:""Presidents Are Not Kings": Federal Judge Destroys Trump's "Absolute Immunity" Defense Against Impeachment"
407:
175:
692:
624:
231:
66:, which sometimes applies when certain officials may have violated constitutional rights or federal law.
566:
179:
602:
464:
786:
450:
350:
245:
when performing purely administrative functions concerning a criminal prosecution. Additionally, the
478:
436:
158:
of this narrative is unclear. There have been criminal investigations of three sitting presidents (
125:
182:
from prosecuting a president, which some legal scholars have criticized but others have endorsed.
393:
301:
296:
225:
63:
39:
917:
859:
826:
772:
620:
616:
581:
258:
50:
and suits for damages, so long as officials are acting within the scope of their duties. The
800:
607:
422:
136:
321:
143:
43:
970:
945:
Beyond
Absolute Immunity: Alternative Protections for Prosecutors Against Ultimately.
364:
159:
75:
17:
167:
163:
910:"Donald McGahn Must Testify to Congress, Judge Rules; Administration Will Appeal"
852:"Donald McGahn Must Testify to Congress, Judge Rules; Administration Will Appeal"
105:
witnesses while testifying in court (although they are still subject to perjury);
204:
155:
47:
234:
also exists for acts closely related to the criminal process' judicial phase.
55:
921:
863:
830:
78:, absolute civil immunity applies to the following people and circumstances:
241:
held in a 2019 decision that a prosecutor is not entitled to absolute
654:"Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump's Claim of Absolute Immunity"
216:"Prosecutorial immunity" redirects here. Not to be confused with
672:"What does the immunity ruling mean for Trump's criminal cases?"
819:"Judge Rejects White House Claims of Immunity for Close Aides"
559:"Was General Grant Arrested for Speeding in Washington, D.C.?"
479:"Connecticut Court Rules That Lawyers Can't Be Sued for Fraud"
91:
executive officers while performing adjudicative functions;
185:
In defense against federal criminal prosecution for his
88:
government prosecutors while making charging decisions;
27:
Form of total legal immunity for government officials
724:"7th Circuit pokes a hole in prosecutorial immunity"
174:
two years after leaving office.) Memoranda from the
947:106 Northwestern University Law Review 1883, 1883.
509:"Can a President's Absolute Immunity be Trumped?"
108:lawyers in certain circumstances related to fraud
178:issued in 1973 and 2000 internally prohibit the
652:Alan Feuer; Charlie Savage (February 6, 2024).
601:Prakash, Saikrishna Bangalore (November 2021).
533:Can a President’s Absolute Immunity be Trumped?
42:for government officials that confers complete
958:Reconsidering Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity
189:, in January 2024 Donald Trump argued to the
82:lawmakers engaged in the legislative process;
8:
239:U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
154:for speeding while in office, although the
603:"Prosecuting and Punishing Our Presidents"
119:Presidential immunity in the United States
85:judges acting in their judicial capacity;
563:Ulysses S. Grant National Historic Site
313:
693:"How Broad Is Prosecutorial Immunity?"
579:
939:
937:
812:
810:
717:
715:
713:
687:
685:
503:
501:
499:
388:
386:
384:
7:
345:
343:
341:
223:In 1976, the Supreme Court ruled in
194:had ever been criminally indicted.
722:Balko, Radley (January 30, 2014).
52:Supreme Court of the United States
25:
369:LII / Legal Information Institute
62:Absolute immunity contrasts with
960:, 2005 B.Y.U. Law Review 53, 56.
187:alleged 2020 election subversion
908:Savage, Charlie (2019-11-25).
850:Savage, Charlie (2019-11-25).
426:, 438 U.S. 478, 513-17 (1978).
96:President of the United States
1:
152:Ulysses S. Grant was arrested
134:, the Supreme Court held in
561:. Research by Ryan Semmes.
454:, 457 U.S. 800, 802 (1982).
397:, 424 U.S. 409, 418 (1976).
354:, 457 U.S. 800, 806 (1982).
191:DC Circuit Court of Appeals
998:
977:American legal terminology
275:U.S. Department of Justice
256:
215:
116:
817:Tau, Byron (2019-11-26).
753:www.criminallegalnews.org
218:Immunity from prosecution
170:), but no prosecutions. (
790:, 120 NC App 878 (1995).
243:prosecutorial discretion
176:Office of Legal Counsel
804:, 438 U.S. 478 (1978).
586:: CS1 maint: others (
468:, 566 U.S. 356 (2012).
440:, 457 U.S. 731 (1982).
411:, 509 U.S. 259 (1993).
408:Buckley v. Fitzsimmons
232:prosecutorial immunity
212:Prosecutorial immunity
200:Trump v. United States
776:, 435 U.S. at 356-57.
567:National Park Service
180:Department of Justice
113:Presidential immunity
18:Presidential immunity
956:Johns, Margaret Z.,
548:520 U.S. 681 (1997).
451:Harlow v. Fitzgerald
365:"Qualified immunity"
351:Harlow v. Fitzgerald
268:Testimonial immunity
823:Wall Street Journal
728:The Washington Post
437:Nixon v. Fitzgerald
326:biotech.law.lsu.edu
322:"Absolute Immunity"
126:Nixon v. Fitzgerald
914:The New York Times
856:The New York Times
658:The New York Times
394:Imbler v. Pachtman
302:Qualified immunity
297:Sovereign immunity
226:Imbler v. Pachtman
172:Trump was indicted
64:qualified immunity
40:sovereign immunity
773:Stump v. Sparkman
483:Insurance Journal
259:Judicial immunity
253:Judicial immunity
36:absolute immunity
32:United States law
16:(Redirected from
989:
961:
954:
948:
943:Taddei, John P.
941:
932:
931:
929:
928:
905:
899:
898:
896:
895:
883:Durkee, Alison.
880:
874:
873:
871:
870:
847:
841:
840:
838:
837:
814:
805:
801:Butz v. Economou
797:
791:
783:
777:
769:
763:
762:
760:
759:
745:
739:
738:
736:
734:
719:
708:
707:
705:
704:
689:
680:
679:
668:
662:
661:
649:
643:
642:
640:
638:
608:Texas Law Review
598:
592:
591:
585:
577:
575:
574:
555:
549:
546:
540:
538:
530:
524:
523:
521:
520:
505:
494:
493:
491:
490:
475:
469:
465:Rehberg v. Paulk
461:
455:
447:
441:
433:
427:
423:Butz v. Economou
418:
412:
404:
398:
390:
379:
378:
376:
375:
361:
355:
347:
336:
335:
333:
332:
318:
137:Clinton v. Jones
21:
997:
996:
992:
991:
990:
988:
987:
986:
967:
966:
965:
964:
955:
951:
942:
935:
926:
924:
907:
906:
902:
893:
891:
882:
881:
877:
868:
866:
849:
848:
844:
835:
833:
816:
815:
808:
798:
794:
787:Sharp v. Gulley
784:
780:
770:
766:
757:
755:
747:
746:
742:
732:
730:
721:
720:
711:
702:
700:
691:
690:
683:
670:
669:
665:
651:
650:
646:
636:
634:
600:
599:
595:
578:
572:
570:
557:
556:
552:
547:
543:
536:
531:
527:
518:
516:
507:
506:
497:
488:
486:
477:
476:
472:
462:
458:
448:
444:
434:
430:
419:
415:
405:
401:
391:
382:
373:
371:
363:
362:
358:
348:
339:
330:
328:
320:
319:
315:
310:
293:
284:
270:
261:
255:
247:Seventh Circuit
221:
214:
121:
115:
72:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
995:
993:
985:
984:
982:Legal immunity
979:
969:
968:
963:
962:
949:
933:
900:
875:
842:
806:
792:
778:
764:
740:
709:
681:
663:
644:
593:
550:
541:
525:
495:
470:
456:
442:
428:
413:
399:
380:
356:
337:
312:
311:
309:
306:
305:
304:
299:
292:
289:
283:
280:
269:
266:
257:Main article:
254:
251:
213:
210:
144:Trump v. Vance
117:Main article:
114:
111:
110:
109:
106:
103:
99:
92:
89:
86:
83:
71:
68:
46:from criminal
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
994:
983:
980:
978:
975:
974:
972:
959:
953:
950:
946:
940:
938:
934:
923:
919:
915:
911:
904:
901:
890:
886:
879:
876:
865:
861:
857:
853:
846:
843:
832:
828:
824:
820:
813:
811:
807:
803:
802:
796:
793:
789:
788:
782:
779:
775:
774:
768:
765:
754:
750:
744:
741:
729:
725:
718:
716:
714:
710:
698:
694:
688:
686:
682:
677:
673:
667:
664:
659:
655:
648:
645:
633:
629:
628:
622:
618:
615:(1): 55–113.
614:
610:
609:
604:
597:
594:
589:
583:
568:
564:
560:
554:
551:
545:
542:
534:
529:
526:
514:
510:
504:
502:
500:
496:
484:
480:
474:
471:
467:
466:
460:
457:
453:
452:
446:
443:
439:
438:
432:
429:
425:
424:
417:
414:
410:
409:
403:
400:
396:
395:
389:
387:
385:
381:
370:
366:
360:
357:
353:
352:
346:
344:
342:
338:
327:
323:
317:
314:
307:
303:
300:
298:
295:
294:
290:
288:
281:
279:
276:
267:
265:
260:
252:
250:
248:
244:
240:
235:
233:
228:
227:
219:
211:
209:
206:
202:
201:
195:
192:
188:
183:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
160:Richard Nixon
157:
153:
148:
146:
145:
139:
138:
133:
128:
127:
120:
112:
107:
104:
100:
97:
93:
90:
87:
84:
81:
80:
79:
77:
76:United States
69:
67:
65:
60:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
38:is a type of
37:
33:
19:
957:
952:
944:
925:. Retrieved
913:
903:
892:. Retrieved
888:
878:
867:. Retrieved
855:
845:
834:. Retrieved
822:
799:
795:
785:
781:
771:
767:
756:. Retrieved
752:
743:
731:. Retrieved
727:
701:. Retrieved
699:. 2009-11-03
696:
676:The Guardian
675:
666:
657:
647:
635:. Retrieved
626:
612:
606:
596:
571:. Retrieved
553:
544:
528:
517:. Retrieved
515:. 2017-05-09
512:
487:. Retrieved
485:. 2013-05-21
482:
473:
463:
459:
449:
445:
435:
431:
420:
416:
406:
402:
392:
372:. Retrieved
368:
359:
349:
329:. Retrieved
325:
316:
285:
271:
262:
236:
224:
222:
198:
196:
184:
168:Donald Trump
164:Bill Clinton
149:
142:
135:
131:
124:
122:
73:
61:
35:
29:
889:Vanity Fair
282:Controversy
205:presumption
156:historicity
48:prosecution
971:Categories
927:2020-02-22
894:2020-02-22
869:2020-02-22
836:2020-02-22
758:2020-03-16
703:2020-03-16
697:SCOTUSblog
573:2023-05-03
519:2020-02-22
489:2020-02-22
374:2020-03-16
331:2020-02-22
132:Fitzgerald
56:common law
922:0362-4331
864:0362-4331
831:0099-9660
733:March 15,
632:154035452
637:31 March
582:cite web
291:See also
44:immunity
621:4039230
513:Lawfare
74:In the
920:
862:
829:
630:
619:
166:, and
102:issue;
625:EBSCO
308:Notes
70:Types
918:ISSN
860:ISSN
827:ISSN
735:2020
639:2023
627:host
617:SSRN
588:link
421:See
94:the
613:100
197:In
30:In
973::
936:^
916:.
912:.
887:.
858:.
854:.
825:.
821:.
809:^
751:.
726:.
712:^
695:.
684:^
674:.
656:.
623:.
611:.
605:.
584:}}
580:{{
511:.
498:^
481:.
383:^
367:.
340:^
324:.
162:,
34:,
930:.
897:.
872:.
839:.
761:.
737:.
706:.
678:.
660:.
641:.
590:)
576:.
569:)
565:(
539:"
537:'
522:.
492:.
377:.
334:.
220:.
98:;
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.