Knowledge (XXG)

Proposed Japanese invasion of Australia during World War II

Source đź“ť

357:. The question of whether to invade Australia was discussed by Imperial Headquarters for the last time on 27 February and in this meeting the Army stated that it believed that Australia was defended by a 600,000-strong military force. During a further meeting held on 4 March the Imperial Headquarters formally agreed to a "Fundamental Outline of Recommendations for Future War Leadership" which relegated the option of invading Australia as a "future option" only if all other plans went well. This plan was presented to the Emperor by Prime Minister Hideki TĹŤjĹŤ and in effect ended discussion of invading Australia. The FS Operation was not implemented, however, due to Japan's defeats in the 288:(between 45,000 and 60,000 men) would be sufficient to secure Australia's north-eastern and north-western coastal areas. In contrast, the Army calculated that a force of at least ten divisions (between 150,000 and 250,000 men) would be needed. The Army's planners estimated that transporting this force to Australia would require 1.5 to 2 million tons of shipping, which would have required delaying the return of requisitioned merchant shipping. This invasion force would have been larger than the entire force used to conquer 275: 43: 113:, in late 1942. The Australian townships of Darwin and Broome were attacked by air a number of times, and the fact that Sydney Harbor was also attacked by two midget submarines certainly would have given the Australians and Americans the impression that the Japanese were considering invasion as a strong possibility. This also supported the strategic planning of the 552:", Curtin said, which threatened the Commonwealth, the United States, and the entire English-speaking world. Not knowing that Japan did not plan to invade Australia and in February 1942 could not successfully do so, the Australian government and people expected an invasion soon. The fear was greatest until June 1942. Curtin said on 16 February: 556:
The protection of this country is no longer that of a contribution to a world at war but the resistance to an enemy threatening to invade our own shore ... It is now work or fight as we have never worked or fought before ... On what we do now depends everything we may like to do when this bloody test
340:
The dispute between the Army and Navy was settled in late February with a decision to isolate rather than invade Australia. The Army continued to maintain its view that invading Australia was impractical, but agreed to extend Japan's strategic perimeter and cut Australia off from the US by invading
411:
The generals of the Army General Staff, and the Prime Minister of Japan, General Hideki Tojo, did not see a need to commit massive troop resources to the conquest of Australia, with the massive logistical problems that would produce. The generals were confident that Australia could be bullied into
196:
The Japanese Army opposed the Navy's proposal as being impractical. The Army's focus was on defending the perimeter of Japan's conquests, and it believed that invading Australia would over-extend these defence lines. Moreover, the Army was not willing to release the large number of troops it
185:. The Navy headquarters argued that this invasion could be carried out by a small landing force as this area of Australia was lightly defended and isolated from Australia's main population centres. There was not universal support for this proposal within the Navy, however, and 516:
did not see any signs of recent human activity, and little of military significance was learnt from the mission. An officer involved with the mission reportedly returned to Japan shortly afterward, where he suggested landing 200 Japanese convicts in Australia, to launch a
151:
in February 1942, the Australian government, the military and the people were deeply alarmed by the possibility of a Japanese invasion. Widespread fear led to an expansion of Australia's military and war economy, as well as closer links with the United States.
335:
He said that after he had taken Singapore, he wanted to discuss with Tojo a plan for the invasion of Australia... Tojo turned down the plan, making the excuse of lengthened supply lines, which would be precarious and open to enemy
292:. The Army also rejected the Navy's proposal of limiting an invasion of Australia to securing enclaves in the north of the country as being unrealistic given the likely Allied counter-offensives against these positions. Due to 278:
Japanese advances in the Southwest Pacific and Southeast Asia areas during the first five months of the Pacific Campaign of World War II. The proposed offensive on Fiji, Samoa, and New Caledonia is depicted in the lower right
452:
between July and September 1942 aimed to capture the town to complete Japan's defensive perimeter in the region. Once secured, Port Moresby was to have been used as a base from which Japanese aircraft could dominate the
1303: 226:
also consistently opposed invading Australia. Instead, Tojo favoured a policy of forcing Australia to submit by cutting its lines of communication with the US. In his last interview before being executed for
283:
The Army's and the Navy's calculations of the number of troops needed to invade Australia differed greatly and formed a central area of discussion. In December 1941 the Navy calculated that a force of three
239:. We did not have the armed strength or the supply facilities to mount such a terrific extension of our already over-strained and too thinly spread forces. We expected to occupy all New Guinea, to maintain 569:
has been critical of the oft-repeated, widespread myth that Japan intended to invade Australia, commenting "the invasion myth helps justify the parochial view Australians took of their war effort."
323:
again discussed invading Australia and during this discussion Captain Tomioka argued that it would be possible to take Australia with a "token force". This statement was labelled "so much
299:
The possibility of invading Australia was discussed by the Japanese Army and Navy on several occasions in February 1942. On 6 February the Navy Ministry formally proposed a plan in which
1420: 1410: 500:
on the mainland. While smoke was seen in hills to the east, the Japanese vessel was anchored and camouflaged with tree branches. Landing parties went ashore near the mouth of the
1265: 1440: 296:
the Army believed that any invasion of Australia would have to involve an attempt to conquer the entire Australian continent, something which was beyond Japan's abilities.
181:, the head of the Navy General Staff's Planning section, on the grounds that the United States was likely to use Australia as a base to launch a counter-offensive in the 1435: 1192: 468:("Pine Tree"), a joint army-navy intelligence unit, landed to assess reports that the Allies had begun to build major new bases on the northernmost coast of the 1273: 271:
and Australia would be crushed if they resisted; but if they recognised Japan's true intentions would receive help in promoting their welfare and development."
1425: 484:, the unit – comprising 10 Japanese personnel in a commandeered fishing vessel crewed by West Timorese civilians – made brief visits to the uninhabited 1036: 1430: 429: 384: 374: 98:
in May and June 1942, and all subsequent Japanese operations in the vicinity of Australia were undertaken to slow the advance of Allied forces.
1106: 1255: 1181: 1046: 589:
depicts a successful Japanese invasion of Australia and the last-ditch resistance effort made by a handful of Australian and British troops.
1358: 1212: 30: 141: 1277: 1133:
Hattori, Takushiro (1980) . "Statement Concerning Reasons for Opposition to Plan for Invasion of Australia". In Donald S. Detwiler (ed.).
417: 378: 169:
led elements of the Imperial Japanese Navy to propose invading Australia. In December 1941 the Navy proposed including an invasion of
1142: 1085: 748: 392: 1096: 924: 420:
in 1942 and 1943 were mainly small and aimed to prevent the Allied air units based there from attacking Japanese positions. The
259:
as these were 'evil bases used against East Asia', and turn these places into strongholds for the defence of Greater East Asia.
264: 128:
states that the Japanese "army dismissed the idea as 'gibberish', knowing that troops sent further south would weaken Japan in
920: 1015: 990: 699: 46:
An Australian propaganda poster from 1942 referring to the threat of Japanese invasion. This poster was criticised for being
501: 469: 320: 1176:. Research in international studies Ohio University research in international studies. Volume 108. Singapore: NUS Press. 1415: 970:. Australia in the War of 1939–1945. Series 4 â€“ Civil. Canberra: Australian War Memorial. pp. 70–73. 6429367X. 638: 562: 525:, "No historian of standing believes the Japanese had a plan to invade Australia, there is not a skerrick of evidence." 534: 300: 29:"Invasion of Australia" redirects here. For the European settlement of Australia, sometimes called an "invasion", see 412:
surrender to Japan by isolating it completely from the United States and by applying intense psychological pressure.
1445: 653: 404: 464:
A small Japanese reconnaissance unit carried out a brief landing on the Australian mainland during January 1944.
105:, where the Japanese suffered from the first defeat of a land battle at the hands of an Australian Brigade, and 421: 293: 1110: 658: 432:
off the Australian east coast in 1942 and 1943 were attempts to break the supply line between Australia and
358: 268: 220: 121: 91: 34: 251:
on 12 January and 16 February 1942, Tojo claimed Japanese policy was to "eradicate the British colonies at
622: 586: 400: 236: 79: 75: 67: 59: 445: 260: 51: 17: 243:
as a holding base, and to raid Northern Australia by air. But actual physical invasion—no, at no time.
144:
also deprecated it, unable to spare the million tonnes of shipping the invasion would have consumed."
643: 549: 388: 82:
defences. Instead, the Japanese military adopted a strategy of isolating mainland Australia from the
109:, where the Australians prevented the Japanese reaching Port Moresby, the capital of the Australian 449: 437: 316: 285: 148: 106: 102: 1334: 1381: 1227: 1056: 598: 328: 182: 170: 110: 1114: 274: 42: 1373: 1345: 1251: 1177: 1160: 1138: 1081: 1042: 1011: 986: 744: 738: 578: 545: 541: 252: 178: 383:
As the option of invading Australia was rejected in February 1942 and was not revisited, the
1321: 1313: 610: 396: 362: 186: 95: 1038:
Japanese army operations in the South Pacific Area New Britain and Papua campaigns, 1942–43
1068: 593: 256: 174: 1100: 304: 289: 190: 1404: 648: 566: 522: 489: 454: 350: 312: 248: 198: 125: 114: 83: 1159:. Canberra: Department of History, Australian Defence Force Academy. pp. 1–20. 1008:
Rising Sun Victorious: The Alternate History of how the Japanese Won the Pacific War
1174:
Tensions of empire: Japan and Southeast Asia in the colonial and postcolonial world
1152: 1078:
Japan's Southward Advance and Australia. From the Sixteenth Century to World War II
734: 668: 504:. They reconnoitred the surrounding area for about two hours and filmed it with an 485: 441: 425: 354: 206: 137: 965: 1223: 537: 223: 166: 71: 1317: 618: 497: 481: 433: 228: 1377: 1349: 1164: 663: 521:
campaign. This suggestion was not, however, adopted. According to historian
518: 505: 473: 458: 324: 210: 202: 133: 63: 1372:(2). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Land Warfare Studies Centre. 617:
by John H. Gill that posits a briefly-successful Japanese invasion of the
315:, and this was again rejected by the Army. On 14 February, the day before 47: 1325: 1266:"Japanese Operations in the Southwest Pacific Area, Volume II – Part I" 214: 87: 626: 477: 240: 235:
We never had enough troops to . We had already far out-stretched our
722:
The Oxford History of Australia: Volume 5: 1942–1995. The Middle Way
512:
personnel again reconnoitred the area, before returning to Kupang.
1135:
War in Asia and the Pacific. Volume 7. The Southern Area (Part II)
346: 308: 129: 41: 303:
would be invaded at the same time other Japanese forces captured
177:
was conquered. This proposal was most strongly pushed by Captain
140:
threat. Not only did the Japanese army condemn the plan, but the
342: 428:
prior to the Japanese attempt to capture it and the subsequent
424:
in May 1942 had the goal of diverting Allied forces away from
327:" in the Imperial General Headquarters' secret diary. General 602:, Imperial Japan launches an invasion of northern Australia. 1248:
Invading Australia. Japan and the Battle for Australia, 1942
1305:
A Slim Barrier: The Defence of Mainland Australia 1939-1945
267:
would get independence if they co-operated with Japan; the
561:
Former Head of the Centre for Historical Research at the
548:
occurred after Dunkirk; "the fall of Singapore opens the
369:
Subsequent Japanese operations in the South-West Pacific
407:
and was not related to an invasion. According to Frei:
1193:"Get over it, we weren't at the heart of World War II" 1344:. Canberra: Department of the Parliamentary Library. 197:
calculated was needed for such an operation from the
1213:"He's (not) Coming South": the invasion that wasn't" 209:would enter the Pacific War and wanted to preserve 173:as one of Japan's "stage two" war objectives after 1335:"Invasion 1942? Australia and the Japanese Threat" 870: 868: 387:during the war were not precursors to invasion, 554: 461:, and not to support an invasion of Australia. 409: 403:from using these towns as bases to contest the 333: 233: 101:This is all despite key battles, including the 1333:Brown, Gary; Anderson, David (29 April 1992). 1421:Cancelled military operations of World War II 1411:Military history of Japan during World War II 1274:United States Army Center of Military History 90:. This offensive was abandoned following the 74:, who regarded it as being unfeasible, given 8: 605:The 2001 alternate history essay collection 440:. Moreover, the Japanese attempt to capture 1102:Volume I – Royal Australian Navy, 1939–1942 165:Japan's success in the early months of the 50:when it was released and was banned by the 1441:South West Pacific theatre of World War II 1312:(Thesis). University of New South Wales. 1172:Goto, Ken'ichi; Paul H. Kratoska (2003). 1080:. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press. 694: 692: 399:on 3 March were conducted to prevent the 33:. For the controversy over the term, see 1250:. Melbourne: Penguin Group (Australia). 375:Axis naval activity in Australian waters 273: 1155:(1993). "Defending Australia in 1942". 967:The Government and the People 1942–1945 808:Ken'ichi and Kratoska (2003), pg 54–55. 679: 62:(IJN) proposed an invasion of mainland 18:Proposed Japanese invasion of Australia 1064: 1054: 1041:. Canberra: Australian War Memorial. 1035:Bullard, Steven (translator) (2007). 700:"Japanese invasion a myth: historian" 470:Kimberley region of Western Australia 7: 319:, the Army and Navy sections of the 1359:"What is the Battle for Australia?" 365:and was cancelled on 11 July 1942. 66:. This proposal was opposed by the 1436:Australia–Japan military relations 1426:Military attacks against Australia 1191:Matchett, Stephen (30 July 2008). 596:'s 2004 alternative history novel 25: 1107:Australia in the War of 1939–1945 1097:"Chapter 17 – Prelude to Victory" 743:. Cambridge UP. pp. 171–74. 659:Cocos Islands during World War II 405:invasion of the Dutch East Indies 1137:. New York: Garland Publishing. 446:advancing along the Kokoda Track 161:Debate between the Army and Navy 31:History of Australia (1788–1850) 1431:1942 in international relations 919:Daphne Choules Edinger, 1995, " 740:A Military History of Australia 418:air raids on Northern Australia 379:Air raids on Australia, 1942–43 58:In early 1942, elements of the 925:World War II and the Kimberley 923:" and; Cathie Clement, 1995, " 476:. After leaving their base at 1: 921:Exploring the Kimberley Coast 533:After the fall of Singapore, 385:Japanese attacks on Australia 321:Imperial General Headquarters 1270:Reports of General MacArthur 639:Axis victory in World War II 563:National Museum of Australia 430:Japanese submarine campaigns 395:on 19 February 1942 and the 910:Stanley (2008), pg 182–185. 901:Stanley (2008), pg 178–180. 535:Prime Minister of Australia 529:Australian fear of invasion 205:as it both feared that the 193:, consistently opposed it. 1462: 927:" (The Kimberley Society). 654:Battle of Christmas Island 372: 28: 540:compared its loss to the 416:The dozens of subsequent 86:by advancing through the 1302:Arnold, Anthony (2013). 1095:Gill, G. Hermon (1957). 883:Frei (1991), pg 171–173. 844:Frei (1991), pg 165–166. 817:Frei (1991), pg 163–165. 763:Frei (1991), pg 162–163. 422:Attack on Sydney Harbour 78:and the strength of the 1366:Australian Army Journal 1357:Stanley, Peter (2007). 1318:10.26190/unsworks/16482 1246:Stanley, Peter (2008). 1211:Stanley, Peter (2002). 1111:Australian War Memorial 1076:Frei, Henry P. (1991). 1006:Tsouras, Peter (2001). 945:Frei (1991), pp. 173–4. 892:Stanley (2008), pg 108. 389:as is sometimes claimed 359:Battle of the Coral Sea 294:its experience in China 269:Netherlands East Indies 247:In speeches before the 189:, the commander of the 124:principal historian Dr 122:Australian War Memorial 92:Battle of the Coral Sea 35:Australian history wars 1276:. 1994. Archived from 964:Hasluck, Paul (1970). 835:Bullard (2007), pg 78. 702:. The Age. 1 June 2002 559: 414: 338: 317:Singapore was captured 280: 245: 237:lines of communication 68:Imperial Japanese Army 60:Imperial Japanese Navy 55: 981:Hooker, John (1984). 826:Hattori (1949), pg 1. 686:Stanley (2002), pg 3. 607:Rising Sun Victorious 508:. The following day, 277: 76:Australia's geography 52:Queensland Government 45: 1233:on 26 September 2007 1157:The Pacific War 1942 936:Frei (1991), p. 173. 874:Frei (1991), pg 171. 862:Frei (1991), pg 167. 799:Gill (1957), pg 643. 790:Frei (1991), pg 172. 781:Frei (1991), pg 163. 772:Frei (1991), pg 168. 724:(2005) pp 7–10, 15 644:Battle for Australia 550:Battle for Australia 450:landing at Milne Bay 213:for Japan to invade 1416:Cancelled invasions 1010:. Greenhill Books. 438:New Guinea Campaign 107:the Kokoda Campaign 103:Battle of Milne Bay 70:and Prime Minister 1387:on 23 January 2018 1280:on 8 February 2009 1067:has generic name ( 615:Samurai Down Under 599:Designated Targets 557:has been survived. 393:air raid on Darwin 329:Tomoyuki Yamashita 281: 183:South-West Pacific 171:Northern Australia 156:Japanese proposals 142:Navy General Staff 111:Territory of Papua 56: 1446:1942 in Australia 1257:978-0-670-02925-9 1220:Conference Papers 1183:978-9971-69-281-0 1120:on 27 August 2006 1048:978-0-9751904-8-7 983:The Bush Soldiers 720:Geoffrey Bolton, 583:The Bush Soldiers 579:alternate history 546:Battle of Britain 542:Battle of Dunkirk 492:. On 19 January, 444:in New Guinea by 353:in the so-called 301:eastern Australia 179:Sadatoshi Tomioka 149:fall of Singapore 16:(Redirected from 1453: 1396: 1394: 1392: 1386: 1380:. Archived from 1363: 1353: 1339: 1329: 1289: 1287: 1285: 1261: 1242: 1240: 1238: 1232: 1226:. Archived from 1224:Remembering 1942 1217: 1207: 1205: 1203: 1187: 1168: 1148: 1129: 1127: 1125: 1119: 1113:. Archived from 1091: 1072: 1066: 1062: 1060: 1052: 1022: 1021: 1003: 997: 996: 978: 972: 971: 961: 955: 954:Matchett (2008). 952: 946: 943: 937: 934: 928: 917: 911: 908: 902: 899: 893: 890: 884: 881: 875: 872: 863: 860: 854: 851: 845: 842: 836: 833: 827: 824: 818: 815: 809: 806: 800: 797: 791: 788: 782: 779: 773: 770: 764: 761: 755: 754: 731: 725: 718: 712: 711: 709: 707: 696: 687: 684: 629:and Townsville. 611:Peter G. Tsouras 397:Attack on Broome 363:Battle of Midway 187:Isoroku Yamamoto 96:Battle of Midway 21: 1461: 1460: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1390: 1388: 1384: 1361: 1356: 1337: 1332: 1301: 1297: 1295:Further reading 1292: 1283: 1281: 1264: 1258: 1245: 1236: 1234: 1230: 1215: 1210: 1201: 1199: 1190: 1184: 1171: 1151: 1145: 1132: 1123: 1121: 1117: 1094: 1088: 1075: 1063: 1053: 1049: 1034: 1030: 1025: 1018: 1005: 1004: 1000: 993: 980: 979: 975: 963: 962: 958: 953: 949: 944: 940: 935: 931: 918: 914: 909: 905: 900: 896: 891: 887: 882: 878: 873: 866: 861: 857: 852: 848: 843: 839: 834: 830: 825: 821: 816: 812: 807: 803: 798: 794: 789: 785: 780: 776: 771: 767: 762: 758: 751: 733: 732: 728: 719: 715: 705: 703: 698: 697: 690: 685: 681: 677: 635: 594:John Birmingham 575: 531: 381: 373:Main articles: 371: 290:South-East Asia 257:Malay Peninsula 175:South-East Asia 163: 158: 38: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1459: 1457: 1449: 1448: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1428: 1423: 1418: 1413: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1397: 1354: 1330: 1298: 1296: 1293: 1291: 1290: 1262: 1256: 1243: 1208: 1197:The Australian 1188: 1182: 1169: 1149: 1143: 1130: 1092: 1086: 1073: 1047: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1024: 1023: 1016: 998: 991: 973: 956: 947: 938: 929: 912: 903: 894: 885: 876: 864: 855: 853:Potter (1969). 846: 837: 828: 819: 810: 801: 792: 783: 774: 765: 756: 749: 726: 713: 688: 678: 676: 673: 672: 671: 666: 661: 656: 651: 646: 641: 634: 631: 613:has a chapter 574: 571: 530: 527: 370: 367: 221:Prime Minister 191:Combined Fleet 162: 159: 157: 154: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1458: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1432: 1429: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1419: 1417: 1414: 1412: 1409: 1408: 1406: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1360: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1336: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1300: 1299: 1294: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1253: 1249: 1244: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1214: 1209: 1198: 1194: 1189: 1185: 1179: 1175: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1153:Horner, David 1150: 1146: 1144:0-8240-3291-8 1140: 1136: 1131: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1098: 1093: 1089: 1087:0-522-84392-1 1083: 1079: 1074: 1070: 1058: 1050: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1033: 1032: 1027: 1019: 1013: 1009: 1002: 999: 994: 988: 984: 977: 974: 969: 968: 960: 957: 951: 948: 942: 939: 933: 930: 926: 922: 916: 913: 907: 904: 898: 895: 889: 886: 880: 877: 871: 869: 865: 859: 856: 850: 847: 841: 838: 832: 829: 823: 820: 814: 811: 805: 802: 796: 793: 787: 784: 778: 775: 769: 766: 760: 757: 752: 750:9780521644839 746: 742: 741: 736: 730: 727: 723: 717: 714: 701: 695: 693: 689: 683: 680: 674: 670: 667: 665: 662: 660: 657: 655: 652: 650: 649:Brisbane Line 647: 645: 642: 640: 637: 636: 632: 630: 628: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 603: 601: 600: 595: 590: 588: 584: 580: 572: 570: 568: 567:Peter Stanley 564: 558: 553: 551: 547: 543: 539: 536: 528: 526: 524: 523:Peter Stanley 520: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 490:Browse Island 487: 483: 479: 475: 472:, facing the 471: 467: 462: 460: 456: 455:Torres Strait 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 426:Midway Island 423: 419: 413: 408: 406: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 380: 376: 368: 366: 364: 360: 356: 352: 351:New Caledonia 348: 344: 337: 332: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 313:New Caledonia 310: 306: 302: 297: 295: 291: 287: 276: 272: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 249:Diet of Japan 244: 242: 238: 232: 231:Tojo stated, 230: 225: 222: 218: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 199:Kwantung Army 194: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 160: 155: 153: 150: 145: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 126:Peter Stanley 123: 118: 116: 115:Brisbane Line 112: 108: 104: 99: 97: 93: 89: 88:South Pacific 85: 84:United States 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 53: 49: 44: 40: 36: 32: 27: 19: 1389:. Retrieved 1382:the original 1369: 1365: 1342:Issues Brief 1341: 1326:1959.4/53041 1309: 1304: 1282:. Retrieved 1278:the original 1269: 1247: 1235:. Retrieved 1228:the original 1219: 1200:. Retrieved 1196: 1173: 1156: 1134: 1122:. Retrieved 1115:the original 1109:. Canberra: 1101: 1077: 1065:|first= 1037: 1007: 1001: 982: 976: 966: 959: 950: 941: 932: 915: 906: 897: 888: 879: 858: 849: 840: 831: 822: 813: 804: 795: 786: 777: 768: 759: 739: 735:Jeffrey Grey 729: 721: 716: 704:. Retrieved 682: 669:Operation Mo 614: 606: 604: 597: 591: 582: 576: 560: 555: 532: 513: 509: 493: 486:Ashmore Reef 465: 463: 442:Port Moresby 415: 410: 391:. The large 382: 355:Operation FS 339: 334: 298: 282: 246: 234: 219: 207:Soviet Union 195: 164: 146: 119: 100: 57: 39: 26: 587:John Hooker 538:John Curtin 514:Matsu Kikan 510:Matsu Kikan 506:8 mm camera 494:Matsu Kikan 466:Matsu Kikan 436:during the 265:Philippines 255:and in the 224:Hideki Tojo 167:Pacific War 72:Hideki Tojo 1405:Categories 1310:PhD Thesis 1124:6 November 1028:References 1017:0739416987 992:0670197513 985:. Viking. 619:Queensland 609:edited by 573:In fiction 498:York Sound 482:West Timor 434:New Guinea 229:war crimes 147:After the 136:against a 1378:1448-2843 1350:1037-2938 1237:5 October 1165:0729-2473 1057:cite book 664:Kantokuen 623:Cape York 621:coast at 577:The 1984 519:guerrilla 502:Roe River 474:Timor Sea 459:Coral Sea 336:attack... 325:gibberish 286:divisions 253:Hong Kong 211:an option 203:Manchuria 134:Manchuria 64:Australia 737:(1999). 706:12 March 633:See also 496:entered 263:and the 94:and the 48:alarmist 279:corner. 215:Siberia 132:and in 120:Former 1391:1 July 1376:  1348:  1284:8 July 1254:  1202:27 May 1180:  1163:  1141:  1084:  1045:  1014:  989:  747:  627:Cairns 581:novel 544:. The 478:Kupang 401:Allies 349:, and 311:, and 241:Rabaul 138:Soviet 80:Allied 1385:(PDF) 1362:(PDF) 1338:(PDF) 1231:(PDF) 1216:(PDF) 1118:(PDF) 675:Notes 347:Samoa 309:Samoa 261:Burma 130:China 1393:2017 1374:ISSN 1346:ISSN 1286:2010 1252:ISBN 1239:2007 1204:2010 1178:ISBN 1161:ISSN 1139:ISBN 1126:2006 1082:ISBN 1069:help 1043:ISBN 1012:ISBN 987:ISBN 745:ISBN 708:2019 488:and 457:and 448:and 377:and 361:and 343:Fiji 305:Fiji 1322:hdl 1314:doi 592:In 585:by 565:Dr 201:in 1407:: 1368:. 1364:. 1340:. 1320:. 1308:. 1272:. 1268:. 1222:. 1218:. 1195:. 1105:. 1099:. 1061:: 1059:}} 1055:{{ 867:^ 691:^ 625:, 480:, 345:, 331:: 307:, 217:. 117:. 1395:. 1370:4 1352:. 1328:. 1324:: 1316:: 1288:. 1260:. 1241:. 1206:. 1186:. 1167:. 1147:. 1128:. 1090:. 1071:) 1051:. 1020:. 995:. 753:. 710:. 54:. 37:. 20:)

Index

Proposed Japanese invasion of Australia
History of Australia (1788–1850)
Australian history wars

alarmist
Queensland Government
Imperial Japanese Navy
Australia
Imperial Japanese Army
Hideki Tojo
Australia's geography
Allied
United States
South Pacific
Battle of the Coral Sea
Battle of Midway
Battle of Milne Bay
the Kokoda Campaign
Territory of Papua
Brisbane Line
Australian War Memorial
Peter Stanley
China
Manchuria
Soviet
Navy General Staff
fall of Singapore
Pacific War
Northern Australia
South-East Asia

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑