Knowledge

Quality by design

Source 📝

274:. The ICH Guidelines Q8 through Q11 encapsulate these unified recommendations and provide some assistance for manufacturers to implement quality by design into their own operations. ICH Guideline Q8 describes QbD-based drug formulation development and was first published in 2004, being subsequently revised in 2008 (Q8(R2)). The ICH Guideline Q9 describes Quality Risk Management plans, Q10 explains Pharmaceutical Quality Systems, and Q11 refer to the development of active pharmacological substances including biologicals. 42:. Designing for quality and innovation is one of the three universal processes of the Juran Trilogy, in which Juran describes what is required to achieve breakthroughs in new products, services, and processes. Juran believed that quality could be planned, and that most quality crises and problems relate to the way in which quality was planned. 271: 105:
be a senior executive. Each team member's job is to ensure the success of the new product. In addition to organizational integration, a successful team must begin with clearly articulated common goals for the product that are measurable and authorized by the enterprise. These goals must, at a minimum, cover such elements as:
104:
Integrated planning requires a team with a leader whose sole accountability is for the total success of the new product from defining the opportunity through customer purchase, use, service, and recommendation to others. This team leader reports directly to a senior executive, or the team leader can
61:
The Juran Trilogy defines the word "quality" as having two meanings: first, the presence of features that create customer satisfaction; second, the reliability of those features. Failures in features create dissatisfactions, so removing failures is the purpose of quality improvement, while creating
146:
Quality by design incorporates modern tools to preemptively control variation. These tools and methods begin by measuring and understanding the variation that exists by using historical data, testing, and modeling to help forecast, analyze, and eliminate the deleterious effects of variation using
169:
The FDA imperative is outlined in its report "Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21st Century: A Risk-Based Approach." In the past few years, the agency has implemented the concepts of QbD into its pre-market processes. The focus of this concept is that quality should be built into a product with an
133:
Quality by design starts and ends with the customer. Every new product introduction has some amount of trade-off involved. If there are multiple customers, they may have conflicting needs. Even the same customer may have needs that compete with each other. Capacity and speed compete with cost of
228:
CDER's Office of Compliance has played a role in complementing the QbD initiative by optimizing pre-approval inspection processes to evaluate commercial process feasibility and determining if a state of process control is maintained throughout the lifecycle, in accord with the ICH Q10 lifecycle
137:
Quality by design offers a range of tools and methods intended to make these tradeoffs explicit and optimal for the customer. Some tools are highly mathematical, and others relate more to customer behavior. Quality by design sets strong expectations for creative approaches to functional design,
182:
The QbD initiative, which originated from the Office of Biotechnology Products (OBP), attempts to provide guidance on pharmaceutical development to facilitate design of products and processes that maximizes the product's efficacy and safety profile while enhancing product manufacturability.
277:
In November 2017, the ICH issued Guideline Q12 for public consultation to extend the recommendations for the Product Lifecycle Management Plan that were initially defined in the Guideline Q10. According to the ICH, Guideline Q13 will extend the previous guidelines to accommodate continuous
178:
by which it is developed and manufactured along with a knowledge of the risks involved in manufacturing the product and how best to mitigate those risks. This is a successor to the "quality by QC" (or "quality after design") approach that the companies have taken up until the 1990s.
281:
The ICH Steering Committee meets twice a year to discuss the progress of its efforts. This practical input should help ensure that quality risk management and knowledge management are used to make lifecycle adaptations that maintain process control and product quality.
245:
guidance in January 2011 notes the need for companies to continue benefiting from knowledge gained, and continually improve throughout the process lifecycle by making adaptations to assure root causes of manufacturing problems are corrected.
240:
While QbD will provide better design predictions, there is also a recognition that industrial scale-up and commercial manufacturing experience provides knowledge about the process and the raw materials used therein. FDA's release of the
62:
features is the purpose of quality by design. Juran's process seeks to create features in response to understanding customer needs. These are customer-driven features. The sum of all features is the new product, service, or process.
278:
pharmaceutical manufacturing and Q2 (Analytical Validation) will be revised and extended into the guideline Q2(R2)/Q14 to include Analytical quality by design or AQbD.
812: 125:
The team will follow a structured process. The structure is the common framework for all participants in launching the new product and helps ensure success.
778: 199:(ONDQA), a new risk-based pharmaceutical quality assessment system (PQAS) was established based on the application of product and process understanding. 795: 505:"Development of a new predictive modelling technique to find with confidence equivalence zone and design space of chromatographic analytical methods" 710: 744: 727: 543: 503:
Lebrun, Pierre; Govaerts, Bernadette; Debrus, Benjamin; Ceccato, Attilio; Caliaro, Gabriel; Hubert, Philippe; Boulanger, Bruno (2008).
663: 50: 761: 648: 134:
operation. Capacity can compete with speed. Flexibility and feature-rich offerings may have reduced ease of use, and so on.
196: 45:
While quality by design principles have been used to advance product and process quality in industry, and particularly the
608: 161:
The final activity of the quality by design process is to implement the plan and validate that the transfer has occurred.
630: 267: 233: 309:
Godfrey, A. Blanton; Kenett, Ron S. (2007). "Joseph M. Juran, a perspective on past contributions and future impact".
272:
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use
838:
Implementation of QbD Principles in CMC Review, by Chi-Wan Chen, PhD, Deputy Director, Office of New Drug Chemistry
291: 762:"DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURE OF DRUG SUBSTANCES (CHEMICAL ENTITIES AND BIOTECHNOLOGICAL/BIOLOGICAL ENTITIES) Q11" 259: 683: 813:"ICH Q14: Analytical Procedure Development and Revision of Q2(R1) Analytical Validation dated 14 November 2018" 338:
Kenett, Ron S.; Kenett, Dan A. (2008). "Quality by Design applications in biosimilar pharmaceutical products".
203: 832: 504: 465: 207: 93: 46: 524: 446: 355: 326: 242: 171: 649:
https://www.fda.gov/aboutfda/centersoffices/officeofmedicalproductsandtobacco/cder/ucm128080.htm
796:"ICH Q13: Continuous Manufacturing of Drug Substances and Drug Products dated 14 November 2018" 419:"Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Understanding, and Control" 485: 438: 779:"TECHNICAL AND REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCT LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Q12" 115:
The volume of sales or revenue to be generated in an initial time period and for the long run
862: 516: 477: 430: 347: 318: 210:
demonstrating use of QbD principles, product knowledge, and process understanding. In 2006,
175: 296: 85: 35: 696: 402:
Juran, J.M. (1986). "The Quality Trilogy: A Universal Approach to Managing for Quality".
837: 255: 211: 544:"Implications and Opportunities of Applying QbD Principles to Analytical Measurements" 386:
Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality into Goods and Services
856: 528: 359: 147:
standard statistical techniques. Process control consists of three basic activities:
450: 330: 520: 481: 466:"Roadmap for implementation of quality by design (QbD) for biotechnology products" 17: 434: 418: 351: 489: 442: 576:
Juran's Quality Handbook: The Complete Guide to Performance Excellence 6/e
221:
Implementation of a Question-based Review (QbR) Process has occurred in
215: 322: 647:
Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21st Century: A Risk-Based Approach
842: 263: 109:
The customers or customer segments to be served by the new product
218:
became the first product approved based upon such an application.
222: 202:
Implementation of a pilot program to allow manufacturers in the
191:
The following activities are guiding the implementation of QbD:
78:
Develop the features of the new design that will meet the needs.
53:(FDA) for the discovery, development, and manufacture of drugs. 843:
Quality-by-Design Case Studies in Pharmaceuticals and Biologics
118:
Market share, penetration, or sales relative to key competitors
65:
The quality by design model consists of the following steps:
81:
Develop or redevelop the processes to produce the features.
847: 270:
has furthered quality by design objectives through the
664:"Process Validation: General Principles and Practices" 72:
Define the market and customers that will be targeted.
697:"1st QBD Approval for Biologics: Gazyva Design Space" 88:
to be able to transfer the new designs to operations.
833:
Implementing Quality by Design, by Helen Winkle, FDA
138:product features and goals, and production design. 75:
Discover the market, customers, and societal needs.
232:First QbD Approval - including design space - for 311:Quality and Reliability Engineering International 142:Control over variation and transfer to operations 574:DeFeo, Joseph A. & Juran, Joseph M. (2010). 34:) is a concept first outlined by quality expert 542:Schweitzer, Mark; et al. (February 2010). 509:Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 69:Establish the project design targets and goals. 151:Evaluate the actual performance of the process 8: 92:It is not a statistical design method like 658: 656: 684:FDA Approves New Treatment for Diabetes 373: 112:The relative and absolute quality goals 591:Juran's Quality Essentials for Leaders 624: 622: 464:Rathore, Anurag S. (September 2009). 197:Office of New Drug Quality Assessment 154:Compare actual performance with goals 49:, they have also been adopted by the 7: 602: 600: 569: 567: 565: 563: 561: 397: 395: 379: 377: 745:"PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY SYSTEM Q10" 711:"PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT Q8(R2)" 340:Accreditation and Quality Assurance 25: 51:U.S. Food and Drug Administration 165:Pharmaceutical quality by design 254:Working with regulators in the 521:10.1016/j.chemolab.2007.05.010 157:Take action on the difference 38:in publications, most notably 1: 482:10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.06.006 129:Customer-focused optimization 728:"QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT Q9" 234:Biologic License Application 206:to submit information for a 631:"Quality by Design, Part 2" 629:Early, John (19 Feb 2013). 609:"Quality by Design, Part 1" 607:Early, John (14 Feb 2013). 225:'s Office of Generic Drugs. 879: 292:Laboratory quality control 57:Juran on quality by design 40:Juran on Quality by Design 589:DeFeo, Joseph A. (2014). 548:Pharmaceutical Technology 435:10.1007/s11095-007-9511-1 352:10.1007/s00769-008-0459-6 260:European Medicines Agency 187:QbD activities within FDA 417:Yu, Lawrence X. (2008). 236:(BLA) is Gazyva (Roche) 470:Trends in Biotechnology 423:Pharmaceutical Research 204:pharmaceutical industry 170:understanding of the 384:Juran, J.M. (1992). 208:new drug application 94:Design for Six Sigma 100:Integrated planning 47:automotive industry 243:Process Validation 28:Quality by design 18:Quality by Design 16:(Redirected from 870: 820: 819: 817: 809: 803: 802: 800: 792: 786: 785: 783: 775: 769: 768: 766: 758: 752: 751: 749: 741: 735: 734: 732: 724: 718: 717: 715: 707: 701: 700: 693: 687: 681: 675: 674: 668: 660: 651: 645: 639: 638: 626: 617: 616: 604: 595: 594: 586: 580: 579: 571: 556: 555: 539: 533: 532: 500: 494: 493: 461: 455: 454: 414: 408: 407: 404:Quality Progress 399: 390: 389: 381: 363: 334: 121:The release date 86:process controls 21: 878: 877: 873: 872: 871: 869: 868: 867: 853: 852: 829: 824: 823: 815: 811: 810: 806: 798: 794: 793: 789: 781: 777: 776: 772: 764: 760: 759: 755: 747: 743: 742: 738: 730: 726: 725: 721: 713: 709: 708: 704: 695: 694: 690: 682: 678: 666: 662: 661: 654: 646: 642: 628: 627: 620: 606: 605: 598: 588: 587: 583: 573: 572: 559: 541: 540: 536: 502: 501: 497: 463: 462: 458: 416: 415: 411: 401: 400: 393: 383: 382: 375: 370: 346:(12): 681–690. 337: 323:10.1002/qre.861 308: 305: 303:Further reading 297:Quality control 288: 252: 229:Quality System. 212:Merck & Co. 189: 167: 144: 131: 102: 59: 36:Joseph M. Juran 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 876: 874: 866: 865: 855: 854: 851: 850: 845: 840: 835: 828: 827:External links 825: 822: 821: 804: 787: 770: 753: 736: 719: 702: 688: 676: 652: 640: 635:Quality Digest 618: 613:Quality Digest 596: 593:. McGraw Hill. 581: 578:. McGraw Hill. 557: 534: 495: 476:(9): 546–553. 456: 429:(4): 781–791. 409: 391: 372: 371: 369: 366: 365: 364: 335: 317:(6): 653–663. 304: 301: 300: 299: 294: 287: 284: 256:European Union 251: 250:ICH activities 248: 238: 237: 230: 226: 219: 200: 188: 185: 166: 163: 159: 158: 155: 152: 143: 140: 130: 127: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 110: 101: 98: 90: 89: 82: 79: 76: 73: 70: 58: 55: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 875: 864: 861: 860: 858: 849: 846: 844: 841: 839: 836: 834: 831: 830: 826: 814: 808: 805: 797: 791: 788: 780: 774: 771: 763: 757: 754: 746: 740: 737: 729: 723: 720: 712: 706: 703: 699:. 2014-03-18. 698: 692: 689: 685: 680: 677: 673:. 2019-06-05. 672: 665: 659: 657: 653: 650: 644: 641: 636: 632: 625: 623: 619: 614: 610: 603: 601: 597: 592: 585: 582: 577: 570: 568: 566: 564: 562: 558: 553: 549: 545: 538: 535: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 506: 499: 496: 491: 487: 483: 479: 475: 471: 467: 460: 457: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 413: 410: 405: 398: 396: 392: 388:. Free Press. 387: 380: 378: 374: 367: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 307: 306: 302: 298: 295: 293: 290: 289: 285: 283: 279: 275: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 249: 247: 244: 235: 231: 227: 224: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 198: 194: 193: 192: 186: 184: 180: 177: 173: 164: 162: 156: 153: 150: 149: 148: 141: 139: 135: 128: 126: 120: 117: 114: 111: 108: 107: 106: 99: 97: 95: 87: 83: 80: 77: 74: 71: 68: 67: 66: 63: 56: 54: 52: 48: 43: 41: 37: 33: 29: 19: 807: 790: 773: 756: 739: 722: 705: 691: 686:17 Oct 2006. 679: 671:FDA Guidance 670: 643: 634: 612: 590: 584: 575: 551: 547: 537: 512: 508: 498: 473: 469: 459: 426: 422: 412: 403: 385: 343: 339: 314: 310: 280: 276: 253: 239: 190: 181: 168: 160: 145: 136: 132: 124: 103: 91: 64: 60: 44: 39: 31: 27: 26: 554:(2): 52–59. 368:References 848:Juran.com 529:124129813 360:110606284 195:In FDA's 857:Category 515:: 4–16. 490:19647883 451:11700550 443:18185986 331:23806604 286:See also 84:Develop 863:Quality 216:Januvia 176:process 172:product 527:  488:  449:  441:  358:  329:  266:, the 262:) and 816:(PDF) 799:(PDF) 782:(PDF) 765:(PDF) 748:(PDF) 731:(PDF) 714:(PDF) 667:(PDF) 525:S2CID 447:S2CID 356:S2CID 327:S2CID 264:Japan 258:(the 486:PMID 439:PMID 223:CDER 174:and 517:doi 478:doi 431:doi 348:doi 319:doi 268:FDA 214:'s 32:QbD 859:: 669:. 655:^ 633:. 621:^ 611:. 599:^ 560:^ 552:34 550:. 546:. 523:. 513:91 511:. 507:. 484:. 474:27 472:. 468:. 445:. 437:. 427:25 425:. 421:. 394:^ 376:^ 354:. 344:13 342:. 325:. 315:23 313:. 96:. 818:. 801:. 784:. 767:. 750:. 733:. 716:. 637:. 615:. 531:. 519:: 492:. 480:: 453:. 433:: 406:. 362:. 350:: 333:. 321:: 30:( 20:)

Index

Quality by Design
Joseph M. Juran
automotive industry
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
process controls
Design for Six Sigma
product
process
Office of New Drug Quality Assessment
pharmaceutical industry
new drug application
Merck & Co.
Januvia
CDER
Biologic License Application
Process Validation
European Union
European Medicines Agency
Japan
FDA
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use
Laboratory quality control
Quality control
doi
10.1002/qre.861
S2CID
23806604
doi
10.1007/s00769-008-0459-6
S2CID

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.