Knowledge (XXG)

R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary

Source 📝

39: 106:. The Home Secretary took into account public petitions demanding the murderer be imprisoned for life. He refused to take account of their progress and development during detention. He increased the ‘tariff period’ from 10 to 15 years to delay release, and said they should be dealt with on the same basis as adult offenders, where mandatory life sentences were imposed. 129:
His legal premise was wrong: the two sentences are different. A sentence of detention during Her Majesty’s pleasure requires the Home Secretary to decide from time to time ... whether detention is still justified. The Home Secretary misunderstood his duty. This misdirection by itself renders his
118:
held by 3 to 2, that the Home Secretary acted unlawfully by taking into account irrelevant considerations (a public petition) and failing to take into account relevant considerations (progress in detention).
179: 184: 49: 38: 150: 144: 140: 17: 122: 103: 87: 115: 99: 173: 83: 59: 80:
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson
90:
case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review.
102:
had unlawfully decided not to release them from prison, after
147:
to set minimum terms for sentences of life imprisonment
66: 55: 45: 31: 18:R v Home Secretary ex parte Venables and Thompson 127: 8: 125:said the following of the Home Secretary. 37: 32:R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary 28: 104:they were convicted of murder as children 98:Venables and Thompson claimed that the 180:United Kingdom constitutional case law 7: 185:United Kingdom enterprise case law 143:, who successfully challenged the 25: 151:United Kingdom constitutional law 1: 141:Anthony Anderson (murderer) 201: 71: 36: 145:Home Secretary's power 132: 88:UK constitutional law 130:decision unlawful. 76: 75: 16:(Redirected from 192: 41: 29: 21: 200: 199: 195: 194: 193: 191: 190: 189: 170: 169: 164: 159: 137: 112: 96: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 198: 196: 188: 187: 182: 172: 171: 168: 167: 163: 160: 158: 155: 154: 153: 148: 136: 133: 116:House of Lords 111: 108: 100:Home Secretary 95: 92: 74: 73: 69: 68: 64: 63: 57: 53: 52: 50:House of Lords 47: 43: 42: 34: 33: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 197: 186: 183: 181: 178: 177: 175: 166: 165: 161: 156: 152: 149: 146: 142: 139: 138: 134: 131: 126: 124: 120: 117: 109: 107: 105: 101: 93: 91: 89: 85: 82: 81: 70: 65: 61: 58: 54: 51: 48: 44: 40: 35: 30: 27: 19: 128: 121: 113: 97: 79: 78: 77: 26: 174:Categories 162:References 123:Lord Steyn 62:, AC 407 56:Citations 135:See also 110:Judgment 67:Keywords 84:UKHL 25 60:UKHL 25 72:Health 157:Notes 94:Facts 86:is a 46:Court 114:The 176:: 20:)

Index

R v Home Secretary ex parte Venables and Thompson

House of Lords
UKHL 25
UKHL 25
UK constitutional law
Home Secretary
they were convicted of murder as children
House of Lords
Lord Steyn
Anthony Anderson (murderer)
Home Secretary's power
United Kingdom constitutional law
Categories
United Kingdom constitutional case law
United Kingdom enterprise case law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.