32:
or negligently in contravention of the Motor
Vehicles Ordinance. Before the trial, V requested details of the alleged negligence but was refused such particulars. Before V pleaded, he applied to the court for further particulars and this application was also refused. V was convicted of the charge.
66:
This case was decided under the old
Criminal Procedure Act of 1917 which also provided that in charges of contravening a statutory enactment, it shall be sufficient if the description of the offense is in the words of the enactment and that it does not prevent the court from ordering particulars of
55:
Furthermore, it was held that where a court has, on improper grounds, refused to order particulars to be given to an accused in a case where such particulars ought to have been given, the prejudice to the accused is not necessarily cured by postponing the hearing at the conclusion of the Crown case
44:
He stated further that the appellant was not prejudiced, because the grounds of negligence upon which the Crown relied had emerged clearly from the evidence, and the appellant had had ample opportunity of preparing his defense during the period of the remand.
40:
stated in his reasons for judgment that he had refused to order particulars to be given because the charge had followed the wording of the section creating the offense, and he was therefore not entitled to order particulars.
77:
52:
held that on a charge of driving a motor vehicle recklessly or negligently, the accused is entitled to be informed of the particulars of the alleged negligence if he asks for them.
103:
93:
56:
so as to enable the accused to prepare his defense, because the accused will probably have been prejudiced in his
98:
57:
29:
87:
60:
of the Crown witnesses if he was not fully acquainted with the case he had to meet.
37:
26:
67:
the offense to be given by the Crown to the accused in a proper case.
49:
63:
The appeal succeeded and the conviction and sentence was set aside.
8:
7:
14:
25:, V was charged with driving a
1:
120:
104:1934 in South African law
16:South African legal case
94:South African case law
76:R v Verity Amm 1934
58:cross-examination
111:
99:1934 in case law
119:
118:
114:
113:
112:
110:
109:
108:
84:
83:
73:
17:
12:
11:
5:
117:
115:
107:
106:
101:
96:
86:
85:
82:
81:
72:
69:
22:R v Verity-Amm
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
116:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
89:
79:
75:
74:
70:
68:
64:
61:
59:
53:
51:
48:The court on
46:
42:
39:
34:
31:
28:
24:
23:
65:
62:
54:
47:
43:
35:
21:
20:
18:
88:Categories
71:References
38:magistrate
30:recklessly
27:motor car
50:appeal
36:The
80:416
78:TPD
19:In
90::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.