Knowledge (XXG)

Radar jamming and deception

Source đź“ť

288: 613:(ARM) also known as Home-On-Jam (HOJ) missiles: When a target is using self-protective jamming (SPJ), it essentially broadcasts its position. An ARM could be deployed and take out the jamming source. The missile utilizes passive RF homing which reduces its probability of detection. A countermeasure to ARM is not to use self-protective jamming (one could use stand-off jamming, assuming that the missiles has a range no longer than the radar), or have a decoy taking the missile (such as 536: 142: 300: 502: 544: 662:, being picked up by its radar. This interference is eliminated by suppressing the radar's reception for the duration of the transponder's transmission. Instead of "bright-light" rabbits across the display, one would observe very small black dots. Because the external radar causing the transponder to respond is generally not synchronised with your own radar (i.e. different 666:), these black dots appear randomly across the display and the operator sees through and around them. The returning image may be much larger than the "dot" or "hole", as it has become known, anyway. Keeping the transponder's pulse widths very narrow and mode of operation (single pulse rather than multi-pulse) becomes a crucial factor. 96:
is made of different length metallic strips, which reflect different frequencies, to create a large area of false returns in which a real contact would be difficult to detect. Modern chaff is usually aluminum-coated glass fibers of various lengths. Their extremely low weight and small size allow them
208:
in the early 1950s, and was so effective it was believed that all long-range radar systems might be rendered useless. However, the jamming effect can be limited because this requires the jammer to spread its full power between these frequencies—the effectiveness against each frequency decreases with
651:
scope with useless data. Interference is not that common between ground radars, however, because they are not usually placed close enough together. It is more likely that some sort of airborne radar system is inadvertently causing the interference—especially when two or more countries are involved.
526:
In some cases, jamming of either type may be caused by friendly sources. Inadvertent mechanical jamming is fairly common because it is indiscriminate and affects any nearby radars, hostile or not. Electronic jamming can also be inadvertently caused by friendly sources, usually powerful EW platforms
646:
While not usually caused by the enemy, interference can greatly impede the ability of an operator to track. Interference occurs when two radars in relatively close proximity (how close they need to be depends on the power of the radars) are operating on the same frequency. This will cause "running
248:
technique that manipulates received radar energy and retransmits it to change the return the radar sees. This technique can change the range the radar detects by changing the delay in transmission of pulses, the velocity the radar detects by changing the Doppler shift of the transmitted signal, or
669:
The external radar could, in theory, come from an aircraft flying alongside your own, or from space. Another factor often overlooked is to reduce the sensitivity of one's own transponder to external radars; i.e., ensure that the transponder's threshold is high. In this way it will only respond to
122:
are maneuverable flying objects that are intended to deceive a radar operator into believing that they are actually aircraft. They are especially dangerous because they can clutter up a radar with false targets making it easier for an attacker to get within weapons range and neutralize the radar.
63:
There are two general classes of radar jamming, mechanical and electronic. Mechanical jamming entails reflecting enemy radio signals in various ways to provide false or misleading target signals to the radar operator. Electronic jamming works by transmitting additional radio signals towards enemy
253:
techniques to transmit into the sidelobes of the radar. Electronics, radio equipment, and antenna can cause DRFM jamming causing false targets, the signal must be timed after the received radar signal. By analysing received signal strength from side and backlobes and thus getting radar antennae
191:
is a modification of spot jamming where the jammer's full power is shifted from one frequency to another. While this has the advantage of being able to jam multiple frequencies in quick succession, it does not affect them all at the same time, and thus limits the effectiveness of this type of
127:
can be fitted on decoys to make them appear larger than they are, thus furthering the illusion that a decoy is an actual aircraft. Some decoys have the capability to perform electronic jamming or drop chaff. Decoys also have a deliberately sacrificial purpose i.e. defenders may fire
490: 101:. Ships, on the other hand, can benefit greatly from a slow-moving chaff cloud. The cloud is released within the resolution cell of the ship and moves with the wind in one direction. The ship then escapes in another direction. The decoy (chaff cloud) should have a larger 160:
where jammers radiate interfering signals toward an enemy's radar, blocking the receiver with highly concentrated energy signals. The two main technique styles are noise techniques and repeater techniques. The three types of noise jamming are spot, sweep, and barrage.
509:
The burn-through range is the distance from the radar at which the jamming is ineffective. When a target is within this range, the radar receives an adequate target skin return to track it. The burn through range is a function of the target RCS
567:
Limiting unsecure radio communication concerning the jamming and its effectiveness is also important. The jammer could be listening, and if they know that a certain technique is effective, they could direct more jamming assets to employ this
254:
radiation pattern, false targets can be created to directions other than one where the jammer is coming from. If each radar pulse is uniquely coded it is not possible to create targets in directions other than the direction of the jammer.
571:
The most important method to counter radar jammers is operator training. Any system can be fooled with a jamming signal but a properly trained operator pays attention to the raw video signal and can detect abnormal patterns on the radar
172:
occurs when a jammer focuses all of its power on a single frequency. This overwhelms the reflection of the original radar signal off the targets, the "skin return" or "skin reflection", making it impossible to pick out the target on the
97:
to form a dense, long-lasting cloud of interference. This cloud is only effective in the range cell that it occupies. The slow movement of the chaff (compared to a flying target) makes it easily discriminated, based on the lacking
181:(PRF) so the jammer is no longer broadcasting on the same frequency or at the right times. While multiple jammers could possibly jam a range of frequencies, this would consume many resources and be of little effect against modern 113:
have the same effect as chaff but are physically very different. Corner reflectors are many-sided objects that re-radiate radar energy mostly back toward its source. An aircraft cannot carry as many corner reflectors as it can
560:
will limit the effectiveness of most jamming, making it easier to read through it. Modern jammers can track a predictable frequency change, so the more random the frequency change, the more likely it is to counter the
318: 575:
The best indicator of jamming effectiveness to the jammer is countermeasures taken by the operator. The jammer does not know if their jamming is effective before operator starts changing radar transmission
225:
produces noise pulses with period depending on radar mast rotation speed thus creating blocked sectors from directions other than the jammer, making it harder to discover the jammer location.
701:
species has been confirmed. This can be seen as nature's equivalent of radar jamming. Similar to human ECCM techniques, bats are found to change their emission lengths to defeat jamming.
579:
Using EW countermeasures will give away radar capabilities thus on peacetime operations most military radars are used on fixed frequencies, at minimal power levels and with blocked
177:. This technique is only useful against radars that broadcast on a single frequency, and can be countered by changing the frequency or other operational parameters like the 219:
is a new type of barrage jamming whereby one radar is jammed effectively at its source at all frequencies. However, all other radars continue working normally.
87:
energy back to the radar to produce false target returns on the operator's scope. Mechanical jamming devices include chaff, corner reflectors, and decoys.
634:
of the protected aircraft will improve the jamming efficiency (higher J/S). A lower RCS also reduces the "burn-through" range. Stealth technologies like
200:
is a further modification of sweep jamming in which the jammer changes frequencies so rapidly it appears to be a constant radiator across its entire
204:. The advantage is that multiple frequencies can be jammed essentially simultaneously. The first effective barrage jammer was introduced as the 841: 564:
Cloaking the outgoing signal with random noise makes it more difficult for a jammer to figure out the frequency that a radar is operating on.
621:). By towing a decoy/jammer, the decoy maintains a realistic Doppler shift (which tricks the tracker) and lures an ARM away from the target. 485:{\displaystyle {\frac {J}{S}}={\frac {EIRP_{jam}}{EIRP_{radar}}}\times {\frac {4\pi R^{2}}{\sigma }}\times {\frac {BW_{radar}}{BW_{jam}}}} 979: 719: 593: 830: 764: 231:
creates a short noise pulse when radar signal is received thus concealing any aircraft flying behind the jammer with a block of noise.
655:
The interference between airborne radars referred to above can sometimes (usually) be eliminated by frequency-shifting transmitters.
788: 725: 618: 580: 72: 287: 132:
at the decoys, thereby depleting limited stocks of expensive weaponry which might otherwise have been used against genuine targets.
235: 192:
jamming. Although, depending on the error checking in the device this can render a wide range of devices effectively useless.
64:
receivers, making it difficult to detect real target signals, or take advantage of known behaviors of automated systems like
201: 635: 597: 52:
or false information. Concepts that blanket the radar with signals so its display cannot be read are normally known as
663: 178: 989: 710: 299: 34: 984: 731: 515: 685:
is more simple than military-grade radar jamming. The laws about jamming police radars vary by jurisdiction.
819: 758: 926:"High duty cycle moth sounds jam bat echolocation: bats counter with compensatory changes in buzz duration" 610: 92: 882: 737: 694: 658:
The other interference often experienced is between the aircraft's own electronic transmitters, i.e.
250: 607:
system would automatically detect attempts at deceptive jamming, which might otherwise go unnoticed.
272:
deliberately makes some returns look larger on radar in order to hide their nature. This is used by
631: 511: 261: 102: 209:
the number of frequencies covered. The creation of extremely powerful multi-frequency radars like
906: 752: 590:
are usually kept passive when military operations are not ongoing to keep radar locations secret.
587: 157: 853: 535: 955: 898: 770: 743: 553: 182: 141: 945: 937: 890: 268: 146: 124: 109: 873:
Corcoran, A. J.; Barber, J. R.; Conner, W. E. (16 July 2009). "Tiger Moth Jams Bat Sonar".
557: 196: 149: 886: 994: 950: 925: 129: 75:(ECCMs) can sometimes help radar operators maintain target detection despite jamming. 973: 910: 782: 648: 604: 174: 98: 65: 614: 277: 210: 49: 501: 659: 273: 205: 543: 56:, while systems that produce confusing or contradictory signals are known as 894: 698: 682: 41: 17: 959: 902: 673:
One should also reduce the power output of the transponder in like manner.
60:, but it is also common for all such systems to be referred to as jamming. 808: 776: 761: â€“ Device designed to protect aircraft from infrared homing missiles 245: 941: 767: â€“ Radar technology that hides its activity from a detected target 518:), the radars ERP and required J/S (for the jamming to be effective). 820:
EW 101: a first course in electronic warfare By David Adamy, page 196
83:
Mechanical jamming is caused by devices that reflect or re-reflect
842:"Quantum Imaging Technique Heralds Unjammable Aircraft Detection." 542: 534: 118: 84: 45: 38: 552:
Constantly alternating the frequency that the radar operates on (
647:
rabbits", a visual phenomenon that can severely clutter up a
785: â€“ Interference with authorized wireless communications 600:(LPI) modes to reduce the chance that the radar is detected. 596:(AESA) radars are innately harder to jam and can operate in 924:
Fernández, Y; Dowdy, NJ; Conner, WE (15 September 2022).
746: â€“ Electronic device for deceiving detection systems 755: â€“ Combat involving electronics and directed energy 748:
Pages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
321: 734: â€“ Electronic warfare professional organization 715:
Pages displaying wikidata descriptions as a fallback
670:
nearby radars—which, after all, should be friendly.
583:
sectors toward possible listeners (country borders).
681:Jamming radar for the purpose of defeating police 484: 728: â€“ Countermeasure from radar guided missiles 152:. This fighter specializes in electronic warfare. 150:Tornado ECR (Electronic Combat / Reconnaissance) 773: â€“ Former Royal Air Force operations group 185:radars that constantly change their broadcasts. 740: â€“ Interference with animal sonar systems 638:can be used to reduce the return of a target. 527:operating within range of the affected radar. 105:(RCS) than the target, so the radar tracks it. 539:Home-on-jam missile attacking an SPJ aircraft 8: 213:offset the effectiveness of the carcinotron. 779: â€“ Russian ground-based jamming system 44:signals to interfere with the operation of 809:Radar Countermeasures: Range Gate Pull-Off 949: 467: 440: 430: 415: 402: 378: 351: 335: 322: 320: 831:ELECTRONIC WARFARE QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE 500: 140: 801: 283: 7: 37:(ECMs) that intentionally sends out 930:The Journal of Experimental Biology 720:Active electronically scanned array 594:Active electronically scanned array 505:Radar range, and burn-through range 854:"What is a (Police) Radar Jammer?" 765:Low-probability-of-intercept radar 722: â€“ Type of phased array radar 73:Electronic counter-countermeasures 27:Form of electronic countermeasures 25: 789:Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses 726:AN/ALE-55 Fiber-Optic Towed Decoy 619:AN/ALE-55 Fiber-Optic Towed Decoy 630:For protective jamming, a small 298: 286: 249:the angle to the plane by using 156:Electronic jamming is a form of 48:by saturating its receiver with 276:to make them look as large as 236:Digital radio frequency memory 1: 636:radiation-absorbent materials 664:pulse-repetition frequencies 598:low probability of intercept 293:Protective/Standoff jamming 31:Radar jamming and deception 1011: 980:Electronic countermeasures 547:Home-on-jam countermeasure 179:pulse repetition frequency 35:electronic countermeasures 711:36th Bombardment Squadron 305:Protective/Escort jamming 732:Association of Old Crows 516:Effective radiated power 264:" to break a radar lock. 895:10.1126/science.1174096 791: â€“ Military tactic 759:Infrared countermeasure 68:to confuse the system. 611:Anti-radiation missile 548: 540: 506: 486: 260:uses techniques like " 153: 713: â€“ military unit 546: 538: 504: 487: 144: 738:Echolocation jamming 695:jamming of bat sonar 677:Jamming police radar 319: 887:2009Sci...325..325C 632:radar cross section 588:fire control radars 522:Inadvertent jamming 512:Radar cross-section 262:range gate pull-off 229:Cover pulse jamming 103:radar cross-section 942:10.1242/jeb.244187 753:Electronic warfare 549: 541: 507: 497:Radar burn-through 482: 158:electronic warfare 154: 137:Electronic jamming 79:Mechanical jamming 881:(5938): 325–327. 771:No. 100 Group RAF 744:Electronic attack 689:Jamming in nature 554:frequency agility 480: 425: 397: 330: 258:Deceptive jamming 238:, or DRFM jamming 125:Corner reflectors 110:Corner reflectors 16:(Redirected from 1002: 990:Penetration aids 964: 963: 953: 921: 915: 914: 870: 864: 863: 861: 860: 850: 844: 839: 833: 828: 822: 817: 811: 806: 749: 716: 514:), jamming ERP ( 491: 489: 488: 483: 481: 479: 478: 477: 458: 457: 456: 431: 426: 421: 420: 419: 403: 398: 396: 395: 394: 363: 362: 361: 336: 331: 323: 302: 290: 269:Blip enhancement 242:Repeater jamming 21: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1001: 1000: 999: 985:Military decoys 970: 969: 968: 967: 923: 922: 918: 872: 871: 867: 858: 856: 852: 851: 847: 840: 836: 829: 825: 818: 814: 807: 803: 798: 747: 714: 707: 691: 679: 644: 628: 558:spread-spectrum 533: 531:Countermeasures 524: 499: 463: 459: 436: 432: 411: 404: 374: 364: 347: 337: 317: 316: 313: 306: 303: 294: 291: 197:Barrage jamming 183:frequency-agile 139: 130:guided missiles 81: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1008: 1006: 998: 997: 992: 987: 982: 972: 971: 966: 965: 916: 865: 845: 834: 823: 812: 800: 799: 797: 794: 793: 792: 786: 780: 774: 768: 762: 756: 750: 741: 735: 729: 723: 717: 706: 703: 690: 687: 678: 675: 643: 640: 627: 624: 623: 622: 608: 601: 591: 584: 577: 573: 569: 565: 562: 532: 529: 523: 520: 498: 495: 494: 493: 476: 473: 470: 466: 462: 455: 452: 449: 446: 443: 439: 435: 429: 424: 418: 414: 410: 407: 401: 393: 390: 387: 384: 381: 377: 373: 370: 367: 360: 357: 354: 350: 346: 343: 340: 334: 329: 326: 312: 309: 308: 307: 304: 297: 295: 292: 285: 282: 281: 265: 255: 232: 226: 220: 214: 193: 186: 138: 135: 134: 133: 115: 106: 80: 77: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1007: 996: 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 978: 977: 975: 961: 957: 952: 947: 943: 939: 935: 931: 927: 920: 917: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 869: 866: 855: 849: 846: 843: 838: 835: 832: 827: 824: 821: 816: 813: 810: 805: 802: 795: 790: 787: 784: 783:Radio jamming 781: 778: 775: 772: 769: 766: 763: 760: 757: 754: 751: 745: 742: 739: 736: 733: 730: 727: 724: 721: 718: 712: 709: 708: 704: 702: 700: 696: 688: 686: 684: 676: 674: 671: 667: 665: 661: 656: 653: 650: 649:radar display 641: 639: 637: 633: 625: 620: 616: 612: 609: 606: 605:quantum radar 602: 599: 595: 592: 589: 585: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 563: 559: 555: 551: 550: 545: 537: 530: 528: 521: 519: 517: 513: 503: 496: 474: 471: 468: 464: 460: 453: 450: 447: 444: 441: 437: 433: 427: 422: 416: 412: 408: 405: 399: 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 375: 371: 368: 365: 358: 355: 352: 348: 344: 341: 338: 332: 327: 324: 315: 314: 311:Noise jamming 310: 301: 296: 289: 284: 279: 278:capital ships 275: 271: 270: 266: 263: 259: 256: 252: 247: 243: 239: 237: 233: 230: 227: 224: 223:Pulse jamming 221: 218: 215: 212: 207: 203: 199: 198: 194: 190: 189:Sweep jamming 187: 184: 180: 176: 175:radar display 171: 167: 164: 163: 162: 159: 151: 148: 143: 136: 131: 126: 121: 120: 116: 112: 111: 107: 104: 100: 99:Doppler shift 95: 94: 90: 89: 88: 86: 78: 76: 74: 69: 67: 66:radar lock-on 61: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 40: 36: 33:is a form of 32: 19: 933: 929: 919: 878: 874: 868: 857:. Retrieved 848: 837: 826: 815: 804: 692: 680: 672: 668: 660:transponders 657: 654: 645: 642:Interference 629: 615:ADM-160 MALD 525: 508: 274:escort ships 267: 257: 241: 234: 228: 222: 217:Base jamming 216: 195: 188: 169: 166:Spot jamming 165: 155: 117: 108: 91: 82: 70: 62: 57: 53: 30: 29: 18:Radar jammer 697:by certain 211:Blue Riband 206:carcinotron 974:Categories 859:2013-03-14 796:References 699:tiger moth 683:radar guns 170:spot noise 911:206520028 576:settings. 556:) over a 428:× 423:σ 409:π 400:× 202:bandwidth 147:Luftwaffe 58:deception 42:frequency 960:36111562 903:19608920 777:Pelena-1 705:See also 246:repeater 71:Various 951:9637272 883:Bibcode 875:Science 626:Stealth 586:Mobile 572:screen. 568:method. 561:jammer. 145:German 54:jamming 958:  948:  936:(18). 909:  901:  119:Decoys 114:chaff. 995:Radar 907:S2CID 244:is a 240:, or 93:Chaff 85:radar 50:noise 46:radar 39:radio 956:PMID 899:PMID 693:The 617:and 946:PMC 938:doi 934:225 891:doi 879:325 168:or 976:: 954:. 944:. 932:. 928:. 905:. 897:. 889:. 877:. 603:A 581:Tx 251:AM 962:. 940:: 913:. 893:: 885:: 862:. 510:( 492:. 475:m 472:a 469:j 465:W 461:B 454:r 451:a 448:d 445:a 442:r 438:W 434:B 417:2 413:R 406:4 392:r 389:a 386:d 383:a 380:r 376:P 372:R 369:I 366:E 359:m 356:a 353:j 349:P 345:R 342:I 339:E 333:= 328:S 325:J 280:. 20:)

Index

Radar jammer
electronic countermeasures
radio
frequency
radar
noise
radar lock-on
Electronic counter-countermeasures
radar
Chaff
Doppler shift
radar cross-section
Corner reflectors
Decoys
Corner reflectors
guided missiles

Luftwaffe
Tornado ECR (Electronic Combat / Reconnaissance)
electronic warfare
radar display
pulse repetition frequency
frequency-agile
Barrage jamming
bandwidth
carcinotron
Blue Riband
Digital radio frequency memory
repeater
AM

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑