Knowledge (XXG)

Re New Bullas Trading Ltd

Source 📝

31: 372:
overturned the decision. He held that a charge may be divisible, and the parties had unequivocally expressed their intention and ‘unless there is some authority or principle of law which prevented them from agreeing what they have agreed, their agreement must prevail’. In essence, he held that the
134:
New Bullas Trading Ltd granted a charge over book debts in favour of 3i plc. It said this was a fixed charge over the uncollected debts and a floating charge over their proceeds, which went into a designated bank account (or another one that 3i could specify in writing).
90:
case, concerning the definition of a floating charge. It held, somewhat controversially, that it was possible to separate a book debt from its proceeds, and that it was possible to create a fixed charge over the book debt but only a
536: 199: 562: 550: 239: 373:
wording did allow them to have such a form of security, the parties were free to make such arrangements. He said unless, unlawful, the free will of the parties would prevail.
726: 287: 182: 521: 251: 721: 442: 731: 400: 113: 471: 386: 99: 30: 41: 509: 175: 681: 483: 435: 213: 691: 168: 382: 146: 574: 428: 391: 299: 104: 495: 225: 95:
over the proceeds. At the time the decision attracted a great deal of academic commentary, much of it hostile.
629: 142: 655: 589: 405: 314: 118: 150: 459: 687: 659: 604: 359: 263: 138: 87: 355: 141:
held this was impossible. He said there was a floating charge throughout, so the company’s
624: 92: 73: 345: 332: 619: 608: 715: 369: 61: 594: 579: 410: 396: 319: 304: 123: 109: 526: 647: 160: 420: 381:
Although the case remained good law for many years, it was doubted by
424: 164: 399:, before finally being formally overruled by a seven-member 98:
It is now outdated as authority, being first doubted by the
664:
Fixed Charges over Book Debts and other Receivables
67: 55: 47: 37: 23: 652:Charges over Book Debts: A Missed Opportunity 436: 176: 8: 538:British Eagle Ltd v Cie Nationale Air France 201:Re Panama, NZ & Australian Royal Mail Co 686:. Cambridge University Press. p. 307. 443: 429: 421: 183: 169: 161: 29: 20: 727:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases 497:Re Yorkshire Woolcombers Association Ltd 227:Re Yorkshire Woolcombers Association Ltd 640: 472:British India Steam Navigation Co v IRC 153:s 40 with regard to uncollected debts. 252:Siebe Gorman & Co v Barclays Bank 112:, and then formally overruled by the 7: 551:Aluminium BV v Romalpa Aluminium Ltd 240:Aluminium BV v Romalpa Aluminium Ltd 510:National Provincial Bank v Charnley 722:United Kingdom insolvency case law 522:Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Ltd 14: 346:[2011] EWHC 1948 (Ch) 333:[2007] EWHC 1443 (Ch) 668:Charges over Book Debts: A Reply 484:Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd 329:Russell Cooke Trust Co v Elliott 214:Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd 732:1994 in United Kingdom case law 666:(1997) 113 LQR 562; Alan Berg, 288:Royal Trust Bank v NatWest Bank 1: 147:administrative receivership 748: 575:Re Brumark Investments Ltd 392:Re Brumark Investments Ltd 300:Re Brumark Investments Ltd 105:Re Brumark Investments Ltd 601: 586: 571: 559: 547: 533: 518: 506: 492: 480: 468: 456: 352: 339: 326: 311: 296: 284: 276:Re New Bullas Trading Ltd 272: 260: 248: 236: 222: 210: 196: 191:Cases on floating charges 83:Re New Bullas Trading Ltd 72: 60: 28: 24:Re New Bullas Trading Ltd 683:Corporate Insolvency Law 630:Voidable floating charge 680:Vanessa Finch (2002). 595:[2005] UKHL 41 580:[2001] UKPC 28 411:[2005] UKHL 41 397:[2001] UKPC 28 320:[2005] UKHL 41 305:[2001] UKPC 28 143:preferential creditors 124:[2005] UKHL 41 110:[2001] UKPC 28 16:UK insolvency law case 527:[1968] UKHL 4 451:Cases on secured debt 590:Re Spectrum Plus Ltd 406:Re Spectrum Plus Ltd 342:Re Rayford Homes Ltd 315:Re Spectrum Plus Ltd 145:were entitled in an 119:Re Spectrum Plus Ltd 205:(1870) 5 Ch App 318 151:Insolvency Act 1986 460:Holroyd v Marshall 149:to priority under 660:Sarah Worthington 615: 614: 605:Security interest 563:Re BCCI SA (No 8) 463:(1862) 10 HLC 191 366: 365: 360:UK insolvency law 264:Re Brightlife Ltd 255:2 Lloyd’s Rep 142 88:UK insolvency law 79: 78: 739: 698: 697: 677: 671: 645: 539: 498: 475:(1881) 7 QBD 165 445: 438: 431: 422: 356:Floating charges 228: 202: 185: 178: 171: 162: 86:1 BCLC 485 is a 33: 21: 747: 746: 742: 741: 740: 738: 737: 736: 712: 711: 706: 701: 694: 679: 678: 674: 646: 642: 638: 625:Floating charge 616: 611: 597: 582: 567: 555: 543: 537: 529: 514: 502: 496: 488: 476: 464: 452: 449: 419: 385:sitting in the 379: 367: 362: 348: 335: 322: 307: 292: 280: 268: 256: 244: 232: 226: 218: 206: 200: 192: 189: 159: 132: 93:floating charge 74:Floating charge 42:Court of Appeal 17: 12: 11: 5: 745: 743: 735: 734: 729: 724: 714: 713: 710: 709: 705: 702: 700: 699: 692: 672: 639: 637: 634: 633: 632: 627: 622: 620:UK company law 613: 612: 609:UK company law 602: 599: 598: 587: 584: 583: 572: 569: 568: 560: 557: 556: 548: 545: 544: 534: 531: 530: 519: 516: 515: 507: 504: 503: 493: 490: 489: 481: 478: 477: 469: 466: 465: 457: 454: 453: 450: 448: 447: 440: 433: 425: 418: 415: 401:House of Lords 378: 375: 364: 363: 353: 350: 349: 340: 337: 336: 327: 324: 323: 312: 309: 308: 297: 294: 293: 285: 282: 281: 273: 270: 269: 261: 258: 257: 249: 246: 245: 237: 234: 233: 223: 220: 219: 211: 208: 207: 197: 194: 193: 190: 188: 187: 180: 173: 165: 158: 155: 131: 128: 114:House of Lords 77: 76: 70: 69: 65: 64: 58: 57: 53: 52: 49: 45: 44: 39: 35: 34: 26: 25: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 744: 733: 730: 728: 725: 723: 720: 719: 717: 708: 707: 703: 695: 689: 685: 684: 676: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 644: 641: 635: 631: 628: 626: 623: 621: 618: 617: 610: 606: 600: 596: 592: 591: 585: 581: 577: 576: 570: 565: 564: 558: 553: 552: 546: 541: 540: 532: 528: 524: 523: 517: 512: 511: 505: 500: 499: 491: 486: 485: 479: 474: 473: 467: 462: 461: 455: 446: 441: 439: 434: 432: 427: 426: 423: 416: 414: 412: 408: 407: 402: 398: 394: 393: 388: 387:Privy Council 384: 376: 374: 371: 361: 357: 351: 347: 343: 338: 334: 330: 325: 321: 317: 316: 310: 306: 302: 301: 295: 290: 289: 283: 278: 277: 271: 266: 265: 259: 254: 253: 247: 242: 241: 235: 230: 229: 221: 216: 215: 209: 204: 203: 195: 186: 181: 179: 174: 172: 167: 166: 163: 156: 154: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 129: 127: 125: 121: 120: 115: 111: 107: 106: 101: 100:Privy Council 96: 94: 89: 85: 84: 75: 71: 66: 63: 59: 56:Case opinions 54: 50: 46: 43: 40: 36: 32: 27: 22: 19: 682: 675: 667: 663: 651: 643: 588: 573: 561: 549: 535: 520: 508: 494: 482: 470: 458: 404: 390: 383:Lord Millett 380: 368: 341: 328: 313: 298: 286: 275: 274: 262: 250: 238: 224: 212: 198: 137: 133: 117: 103: 97: 82: 81: 80: 18: 654:(1994) 110 716:Categories 704:References 693:0521622565 279:1 BCLC 485 51:1 BCLC 485 648:Roy Goode 554:1 WLR 676 542:1 WLR 758 377:Authority 370:Nourse LJ 243:1 WLR 676 62:Nourse LJ 670:JBL 443. 513:1 KB 431 501:2 Ch 284 417:See also 267:1 Ch 200 231:2 Ch 284 157:Judgment 68:Keywords 48:Citation 291:BCC 316 690:  566:AC 214 139:Knox J 658:592; 636:Notes 593: 578: 525: 487:AC 22 409: 395: 344: 331: 318: 303: 217:AC 22 130:Facts 122: 108: 38:Court 688:ISBN 603:see 354:see 656:LQR 607:in 403:in 389:in 358:in 116:in 102:in 718:: 662:, 650:, 413:. 126:. 696:. 444:e 437:t 430:v 184:e 177:t 170:v

Index


Court of Appeal
Nourse LJ
Floating charge
UK insolvency law
floating charge
Privy Council
Re Brumark Investments Ltd
[2001] UKPC 28
House of Lords
Re Spectrum Plus Ltd
[2005] UKHL 41
Knox J
preferential creditors
administrative receivership
Insolvency Act 1986
v
t
e
Re Panama, NZ & Australian Royal Mail Co
Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd
Re Yorkshire Woolcombers Association Ltd
Aluminium BV v Romalpa Aluminium Ltd
Siebe Gorman & Co v Barclays Bank
Re Brightlife Ltd
Re New Bullas Trading Ltd
Royal Trust Bank v NatWest Bank
Re Brumark Investments Ltd
[2001] UKPC 28
Re Spectrum Plus Ltd

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.