43:
233:
175:
is only 29 km (18 mi) wide. Natural evaporation would rapidly lower the level of the enclosed Red Sea, by about 2.1 meters per year (6.8 feet per year). Water rushing back into the sea would then drive turbines to generate electricity. The dam would have the potential to generate 50
158:
proposal put forward in 2007 by a group of scientists and engineers. Although the authors' intentions are to explore "the ethical and environmental dilemmas and some of the political implications of macro-engineering", the proposal has attracted both criticism and ridicule.
184:
The proposal's authors point out that "Macro-engineering projects of this size cause massive destruction of existing ecologies", a point emphasized by critics who note the damage caused by current, far smaller schemes.
190:
On the positive side of the environmental scale, however, are the big reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, and the reduced pace of fossil hydrocarbon resource exhaustion
188:
The authors also note the benefits of the project. Besides helping to satisfy the region's growing energy needs, there are environmental benefits to the scheme: "
176:
gigawatts of emissions-free hydroelectric power. In comparison, the largest nuclear power plant in the United States has an output of 3.2 gigawatts.
348:
76:
364:
273:
385:
380:
223:
395:
259:
Power from closing the Red Sea: Economic and ecological costs and benefits following the isolation of the Red Sea
258:
390:
286:
196:
213:
136:
334:
155:
400:
218:
42:
263:
Roelof Dirk
Schuiling, Viorel Badescu, Richard B. Cathcart, Jihan Seoud, Jaap C. Hanekamp
311:
374:
172:
116:
238:
228:
208:
91:
78:
232:
199:
in
California, an anti-dam organization, condemned the scheme as ludicrous.
17:
142:
60:
168:
48:
367:
by
Richard Cathcart, one of the authors of the Red Sea Dam proposal.
64:
135:
130:
122:
112:
107:
70:
56:
35:
351:New Scientist, 07 December 2007 by Phil McKenna
47:The proposal is to dam the narrow inlet to the
8:
41:
32:
349:Red Sea mega-dam would be 'irresponsible'
51:, shown at the bottom-right of the image.
285:Andrea Thompson published (2007-12-06).
287:"Dam on Red Sea Would Harm Environment"
251:
27:Speculative macro-engineering proposal
7:
195:Peter Bosshard, policy director of
365:Gibraltar Strait Dam Macroprojects
25:
231:
171:at its southern end where the
1:
312:"Dam the Red Sea for power?"
338:on the environmental impact
417:
224:Qattara Depression Project
40:
167:The idea is to dam the
137:Installed capacity
126:29 km (18 mi)
274:New Scientist critique
30:Dam in Djibouti, Yemen
92:12.55694°N 43.37222°E
197:International Rivers
173:Bab-al-Mandab Strait
117:Bab-el-Mandeb Strait
214:Bridge of the Horns
88: /
97:12.55694; 43.37222
386:Dam controversies
381:Macro-engineering
156:macro-engineering
154:is a speculative
148:
147:
108:Dam and spillways
16:(Redirected from
408:
396:Hydroelectricity
352:
346:
340:
332:
326:
325:
323:
322:
307:
301:
300:
298:
297:
282:
276:
271:
265:
256:
241:
236:
235:
219:Hydroelectricity
103:
102:
100:
99:
98:
93:
89:
86:
85:
84:
81:
45:
33:
21:
416:
415:
411:
410:
409:
407:
406:
405:
371:
370:
361:
356:
355:
347:
343:
333:
329:
320:
318:
309:
308:
304:
295:
293:
291:livescience.com
284:
283:
279:
272:
268:
257:
253:
248:
237:
230:
205:
182:
165:
96:
94:
90:
87:
82:
79:
77:
75:
74:
63:
52:
31:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
414:
412:
404:
403:
398:
393:
388:
383:
373:
372:
369:
368:
360:
359:External links
357:
354:
353:
341:
327:
302:
277:
266:
250:
249:
247:
244:
243:
242:
227:
226:
221:
216:
211:
204:
201:
181:
178:
164:
161:
146:
145:
139:
133:
132:
128:
127:
124:
120:
119:
114:
110:
109:
105:
104:
72:
68:
67:
58:
54:
53:
46:
38:
37:
29:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
413:
402:
399:
397:
394:
392:
391:Proposed dams
389:
387:
384:
382:
379:
378:
376:
366:
363:
362:
358:
350:
345:
342:
339:
337:
331:
328:
317:
313:
310:Ling, Frank.
306:
303:
292:
288:
281:
278:
275:
270:
267:
264:
260:
255:
252:
245:
240:
234:
229:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
212:
210:
207:
206:
202:
200:
198:
193:
191:
186:
179:
177:
174:
170:
162:
160:
157:
153:
144:
140:
138:
134:
131:Power Station
129:
125:
121:
118:
115:
111:
106:
101:
73:
69:
66:
62:
59:
55:
50:
44:
39:
34:
19:
344:
336:Live Science
335:
330:
319:. Retrieved
315:
305:
294:. Retrieved
290:
280:
269:
262:
254:
239:Water portal
194:
189:
187:
183:
180:Implications
166:
151:
149:
152:Red Sea Dam
95: /
71:Coordinates
36:Red Sea Dam
18:Red Sea dam
375:Categories
321:2022-02-17
296:2022-02-17
246:References
209:Atlantropa
83:43°22′20″E
80:12°33′25″N
203:See also
163:Proposal
113:Impounds
61:Djibouti
57:Location
401:Red Sea
169:Red Sea
141:50,000
49:Red Sea
123:Length
65:Yemen
316:CNET
150:The
261:by
192:".
377::
314:.
289:.
143:MW
324:.
299:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
