Knowledge (XXG)

Representation before the European Patent Office

Source đź“ť

286:
fails to file such an authorisation, the EPO shall invite him to do so within a period to be specified." "The Decision of the President ... states that in cases of a change of representation, and where the EPO has not been notified of the termination of the previous representative's authorisation, "the new representative must file, together with the notification of his appointment, an individual authorisation (original and one copy) or a reference to a general authorisation already on file. If he does not, he shall be requested to do so within a period to be specified by the European Patent Office."" The legal consequence of not filing an authorisation when requested to do so is that the procedural steps taken by the new representative are deemed not to have been taken. Authorisations, like
17: 89:. A legal practitioner representing a party before the EPO must be qualified in an EPC Contracting State, must have his place of business in that State, and must be entitled in that State to act as a professional representative in patent matters. Both authorised employees and legal practitioners "must file a signed authorisation or a reference to a general authorisation already on file". Subject to these rules, a party has the right to be represented in the manner he chose. 270:, an association of professional representatives may be formed to collectively represent a party or parties before the EPO. In such a case, the authorisation of an association of representatives is deemed to apply to any representative who practises within the association. The Legal Division of the EPO is in charge of the registration of associations. The registration is free of charge. 118:
Formerly being a qualified or experienced patent attorney at the entry into force of the EPC in their state provided exemption from passing the EQEs (known as the "grandfather clause"). In December 1998, the ratio of registrations under the grandfather clause to those having passed the EQE was two to
285:
in combination with the Decision of the President of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations." "Rule 152(1) sets out that the President shall determine the cases in which an authorisation shall be filed," whereas "Rule 152(2) sets out that where a representative
175:
Paper C (5½ hours) consists in drafting a notice of opposition to a European patent. The exercise is based on a fictitious letter from a client, a European patent to be opposed, several documents and an EPO opposition form. For paper C also, the problem-and-solution approach must typically be used
140:
The main European qualifying examination (EQE) is a multi-day examination, comprising four papers, for each of which there is at least one exam. Due to the introduction of the pre-examination in 2012, starting 2013, three papers of the main exam are shorter than their previous formats so that the
131:
Starting 2012, after 2 years of related work experience, candidates can sit the pre-examination, which is a 4-hour multiple choice exam held once a year. The pre-examination assesses candidates' ability to answer legal questions and questions relating to the drafting of claims (IPREE, Rule 10). A
53:
There is no general obligation for a party to be represented by a professional representative to act in proceedings before the EPO. However, a person not having either their residence or place of business within the territory of one of the EPC Contracting States (a "non-European party") "must be
247:
As of November 2010, there were a little more than 10,000 persons on the list of professional representatives, "just less than 1500" "legal practitioners entitled to represent before the EPO", and "about 300 patent law firms, which are registered as „associations of representatives“ within the
234:
The marking of the Paper C of the EQE 2007, including awarding no point when candidates failed to select the "right" starting document (for assessing the inventive step of some claims) and the blanket addition of 10 points to the grade of all C papers, was strongly criticized.
238:
In 2021, the EQE was held online for the first time. A proposal to change the format of the EQE exams into a modular system, held online with some exams being available more than once a year, was discussed at a conference of the European Patent Institute on 21 June, 2021.
122:
In order to sit the EQE, candidates should notably show that "they possess a university-level scientific or technical qualification." An equivalent level of scientific or technical knowledge obtained through at least ten years' experience is also considered sufficient.
1101: 1091: 84:
Representation of persons who must be represented and persons who need not be represented but want to be represented must be by a professional representative, or, if the party is a "European party", the representation may be by an authorised employee or by a
1096: 20:
Badge of a European patent attorney with the fingerprint logo of the EPO. It serves for identifying the carrier at entry to the EPO premises and as an authorization for attending any legal proceedings in patent matters at the
1055: 74: 1172: 302:, a decision of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO, which deals with submissions by accompanying persons in addition to the submissions made by the professional representative appointed by the party 187:
The European qualifying examination is held once a year, usually at the end of February or beginning of March, simultaneously in various cities throughout Europe. In 2013 for instance, it was held in
1086: 913: 1204: 1117: 149:
and the introduction (field of the invention, prior art, problem to be solved and its solution) of a European patent application, on the basis of the fictitious letter by a client describing an
1198: 1029: 1157: 1065: 894: 862: 1050: 980: 305: 63: 1209: 1152: 861:, p.7: Decision of the President of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 concerning the filing of patent applications and other documents by facsimile, Article 3; and 165: 1060: 78: 1045: 55: 231:. Dictionaries and reference material can be used during the examination "as long as they are in paper form". The use of electronic devices is however not permitted. 160:
Paper B (3½ hours) consists in preparing a reply to an official communication of an Examining Division raising substantive objections to a patent application, such
1224: 1177: 16: 54:
represented by a professional representative and act through him in all proceedings", except for filing a European patent application. Proceedings include
973: 330:
When assessing the inventive step of claim (defining an invention in a patent or patent application), the practice at the EPO is to use the so-called "
183:(PCT); and a legal case usually requiring analyzing the legal situation of a client and proposing actions to be undertaken to cope with the situation. 1147: 1522: 966: 793: 573:"Regulation on the European qualifying examination for professional representatives - Decision of the Supervisory Board of 17 November 2016" 1162: 435:, p.128: Decision of the President of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations, Articles 2 and 3. 132:
passing grade of 70 marks out of 100 must be achieved to be permitted to write the main exam (EQE) one year later (IPREE, Rule 6).
108:
be a national of one of the EPC Contracting States (the President of the EPO may grant exemptions "in special circumstances"); and
1070: 709: 311: 752:"List of Professional Representatives as at 19.01.2013 by their place of business or employment in the Contracting States" 169: 989: 858: 827: 432: 572: 552: 830:, p.128: Decision of the President of the European Patent Office dated 12 July 2007 on the filing of authorisations. 548: 522: 33:
providing the legal system according to which European patents are granted, contains provisions regarding whether a
1003: 842: 779: 597: 499:
D. Visser, The Annotated European Patent Convention 2000, 15th Edition, (Veldhoven, The Netherlands, 2007), p. 321.
488: 474: 460: 420: 403: 389: 360: 282: 267: 252: 70: 26: 1137: 918: 331: 180: 945:
PCT Applicant’s Guide, International Phase (Special edition as of 31 December 2012, prepared for EQE candidates)
866: 1142: 1132: 794:
Notice from the European Patent Office dated 28 August 2013 on matters concerning representation before the EPO
898: 1167: 751: 1458: 1024: 951:
PCT Applicant’s Guide National Phase (Special edition as of 31 December 2012, prepared for EQE candidates)
846: 812: 693: 689: 685: 681: 42: 508: 445: 1214: 374: 1317: 1184: 888: 290:, cannot be validly filed by facsimile. An original version of the authorisation has to be filed. 86: 59: 609:
European qualifying examination, Guide for preparation, 3rd edition (September 2013), p. 13-14.
1474: 738: 287: 739:"Interview with Hans-Christian Haugg Director, Legal Division, EPO, Munich, 22 November 2010" 714:, Le blog du droit européen des brevets, September 17, 2008. Consulted on September 17, 2008. 652:
European qualifying examination, Guide for preparation, 3rd edition (September 2013), p. 11.
636:
European qualifying examination, Guide for preparation, 3rd edition (September 2013), p. 10.
627:
European qualifying examination, Guide for preparation, 3rd edition (September 2013), p. 15.
618:
European qualifying examination, Guide for preparation, 3rd edition (September 2013), p. 14.
168:
objections. The reply is to be prepared based on fictitious instructions from a client. The
161: 950: 944: 1367: 668: 100: 38: 662: 938: 1432: 1272: 1219: 146: 34: 1516: 1332: 724: 41:(i.e., a party to the proceedings) needs to be represented in proceedings before the 523:"Regulation on the European qualifying examination for professional representatives" 338:
as the closest prior art, i.e. the starting point for the inventive step assessment.
839: 776: 485: 471: 457: 417: 400: 386: 357: 279: 264: 249: 67: 255:". As of January 2013, there were precisely 10,427 professional representatives. 1422: 1362: 958: 1392: 1357: 1342: 179:
Paper D (5½ hours) consists in a series of legal questions on the EPC and the
446:
Decision T 1687/08 of the Technical Board of Appeal 3.5.02 of 9 November 2011
1337: 1127: 335: 228: 220: 154: 150: 1466: 1407: 1402: 1382: 1257: 1008: 911:
Legal Research Service for the Boards of Appeal, European Patent Office,
224: 200: 1498: 1490: 1482: 1387: 1312: 1307: 1297: 1287: 1282: 1277: 1262: 1252: 1247: 1242: 1122: 1097:
Decisions of the Boards of Appeal relating to Article 52(2) and (3) EPC
196: 1427: 1417: 1397: 1377: 1372: 1352: 1327: 1302: 1292: 1267: 299: 208: 204: 188: 30: 939:
European qualifying examination, Guide for preparation, 3rd edition
598:
European qualifying examination, Guide for preparation, 3rd edition
1412: 1347: 1322: 212: 111:
have a place of business in one of the EPC Contracting States; and
15: 119:
one. On 29 November 2000, this clause was removed from the EPC.
216: 192: 962: 664:
Comments on Paper C of the 2007 European Qualifying Examination
933: 930:
European qualifying examination (EQE) related resources:
114:
have passed the European qualifying examination (EQE); or
789: 787: 104:. In order to be a European patent attorney, one must: 1102:
Successful petitions for review under Article 112a EPC
1092:
Decisions and opinions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal
696:
of the Disciplinary Board of Appeal of 28 August 2008.
566: 564: 562: 560: 334:", which includes a step of selecting of one piece of 306:
Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies
448:, Reasons for the Decision 2.3, penultimate sentence. 1441: 1233: 1110: 1079: 1038: 1017: 996: 711:
Notation C 2007 : première dĂ©cision de recours
527:Official Journal Supplementary publication 2, 2014 1148:European Round Table on Patent Practice (EUROTAB) 66:(as patentee, opponent or intervener pursuant to 847:Board of decision T 0267/08 of 29 November 2010 823: 821: 813:Board of decision T 0267/08 of 29 November 2010 97:Professional representatives bear the title of 1225:Unitary patent (Switzerland and Liechtenstein) 278:The "procedure to be followed is governed by 974: 8: 891:on the European Patent Office (EPO) web site 808: 806: 804: 802: 648: 646: 644: 642: 370: 368: 914:Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO 981: 967: 959: 141:EQE now consists of the following papers: 876: : "Filing of subsequent documents". 577:Supplementary publication 2 – OJ EPO 2017 889:Database of professional representatives 413: 411: 350: 323: 145:Paper A (4 hours) consists in drafting 796:, Official Journal EPO 11/2013, p. 535 895:Guidelines for Examination in the EPO 863:Guidelines for Examination in the EPO 176:for the inventive step assessment(s). 75:limitation and revocation proceedings 7: 1205:Standing Advisory Committee (SACEPO) 859:Special edition No. 3, OJ EPO 2007 828:Special edition No. 3, OJ EPO 2007 758:(1/2013). Carl Heymanns Verlag: 16 571:Mercer, Chris (22 February 2017). 433:Special edition No. 3, OJ EPO 2007 14: 1004:European Patent Convention (EPC) 725:"Course: e:EQE Discussion paper" 1138:European Patent Institute (epi) 815:, Reasons for the Decision 2.2. 136:European qualifying examination 312:USPTO registration examination 259:Association of representatives 81:(as appellant or respondent). 1: 1173:Observations by third parties 849:, Reasons for the Decision 8. 170:problem-and-solution approach 1523:European Patent Organisation 1025:European Patent Office (EPO) 990:European Patent Organisation 93:Professional representatives 510:EPC Transitional Provisions 49:General rule and exceptions 1539: 1215:Unified Patent Court (UPC) 1009:Revised version (EPC 2000) 917:(9th edition, July 2019), 27:European Patent Convention 1056:Limitation and revocation 332:problem-solution approach 181:Patent Cooperation Treaty 1143:European Patent Register 1133:European Patent Bulletin 927: : "Representation" 908: : "Representation" 741:, epi Information 1/2011 737:K. Finnilä, T. Johnson, 600:(September 2013), p. 13. 274:Change of representation 29:(EPC), the multilateral 1118:Divisional applications 529:. EPO. 19 February 2014 172:must typically be used. 1459:Bosnia and Herzegovina 1199:Restitutio in integrum 1030:Administrative Council 539:(Article 11(1)(a) REE) 64:opposition proceedings 43:European Patent Office 22: 19: 934:EQE eLearning Centre 671:4/2007, pp. 153-155. 549:Article 11(1)(a) REE 1220:Unitary patent (EU) 1187:reformatio in peius 1066:Petition for review 708:Laurent Teyssedre, 77:(as patentee), and 288:priority documents 87:legal practitioner 79:appeal proceedings 23: 1510: 1509: 1503: 1495: 1487: 1479: 1471: 1463: 1451: 1445: 1163:Judges' Symposium 444:See for instance 56:grant proceedings 1530: 1501: 1493: 1485: 1477: 1469: 1461: 1449: 1443: 1210:Software patents 1179:Official Journal 1168:London Agreement 983: 976: 969: 960: 925: 921: 905: 901: 877: 873: 869: 856: 850: 837: 831: 825: 816: 810: 797: 791: 782: 774: 768: 767: 765: 763: 748: 742: 735: 729: 728: 721: 715: 707: 703: 697: 678: 672: 659: 653: 650: 637: 634: 628: 625: 619: 616: 610: 607: 601: 595: 589: 588: 586: 584: 568: 555: 546: 540: 538: 536: 534: 519: 513: 506: 500: 497: 491: 483: 477: 469: 463: 455: 449: 442: 436: 430: 424: 415: 406: 398: 392: 384: 378: 372: 363: 355: 339: 328: 153:and the related 1538: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1506: 1447: 1437: 1368:North Macedonia 1235: 1234:EPC contracting 1229: 1185:Prohibition of 1106: 1075: 1046:Grant procedure 1034: 1013: 992: 987: 923: 919: 903: 899: 885: 880: 871: 867: 857: 853: 838: 834: 826: 819: 811: 800: 792: 785: 775: 771: 761: 759: 756:Epi Information 750: 749: 745: 736: 732: 723: 722: 718: 705: 704: 700: 679: 675: 669:epi Information 660: 656: 651: 640: 635: 631: 626: 622: 617: 613: 608: 604: 596: 592: 582: 580: 570: 569: 558: 547: 543: 532: 530: 521: 520: 516: 507: 503: 498: 494: 484: 480: 470: 466: 456: 452: 443: 439: 431: 427: 416: 409: 399: 395: 385: 381: 373: 366: 356: 352: 348: 343: 342: 329: 325: 320: 296: 276: 261: 245: 138: 129: 127:Pre-examination 101:patent attorney 95: 51: 39:juristic person 12: 11: 5: 1536: 1534: 1526: 1525: 1515: 1514: 1508: 1507: 1505: 1504: 1496: 1488: 1480: 1472: 1464: 1455: 1453: 1439: 1438: 1436: 1435: 1433:United Kingdom 1430: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1400: 1395: 1390: 1385: 1380: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1345: 1340: 1335: 1330: 1325: 1320: 1315: 1310: 1305: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1273:Czech Republic 1270: 1265: 1260: 1255: 1250: 1245: 1239: 1237: 1231: 1230: 1228: 1227: 1222: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1195: 1193:Representation 1190: 1182: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1114: 1112: 1111:Related topics 1108: 1107: 1105: 1104: 1099: 1094: 1089: 1083: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1074: 1073: 1068: 1063: 1058: 1053: 1048: 1042: 1040: 1036: 1035: 1033: 1032: 1027: 1021: 1019: 1015: 1014: 1012: 1011: 1006: 1000: 998: 997:Founding texts 994: 993: 988: 986: 985: 978: 971: 963: 957: 956: 955: 954: 948: 942: 936: 928: 909: 892: 884: 883:External links 881: 879: 878: 851: 832: 817: 798: 783: 769: 743: 730: 716: 698: 673: 654: 638: 629: 620: 611: 602: 590: 556: 541: 514: 501: 492: 478: 472:Article 134(7) 464: 458:Article 134(2) 450: 437: 425: 418:Article 134(8) 407: 401:Article 133(3) 393: 387:Article 133(1) 379: 364: 358:Article 133(2) 349: 347: 344: 341: 340: 322: 321: 319: 316: 315: 314: 309: 303: 295: 292: 275: 272: 260: 257: 244: 241: 185: 184: 177: 173: 166:inventive step 158: 137: 134: 128: 125: 116: 115: 112: 109: 94: 91: 50: 47: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1535: 1524: 1521: 1520: 1518: 1500: 1497: 1492: 1489: 1484: 1481: 1476: 1473: 1468: 1465: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1440: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1401: 1399: 1396: 1394: 1391: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1379: 1376: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1333:Liechtenstein 1331: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1319: 1316: 1314: 1311: 1309: 1306: 1304: 1301: 1299: 1296: 1294: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1276: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1264: 1261: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1232: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1200: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1189: 1188: 1183: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1121: 1119: 1116: 1115: 1113: 1109: 1103: 1100: 1098: 1095: 1093: 1090: 1088: 1087:Case Law book 1085: 1084: 1082: 1078: 1072: 1069: 1067: 1064: 1062: 1059: 1057: 1054: 1052: 1049: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1037: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1020: 1016: 1010: 1007: 1005: 1002: 1001: 999: 995: 991: 984: 979: 977: 972: 970: 965: 964: 961: 952: 949: 946: 943: 940: 937: 935: 932: 931: 929: 926: 916: 915: 910: 907: 896: 893: 890: 887: 886: 882: 875: 864: 860: 855: 852: 848: 844: 841: 836: 833: 829: 824: 822: 818: 814: 809: 807: 805: 803: 799: 795: 790: 788: 784: 781: 778: 773: 770: 757: 753: 747: 744: 740: 734: 731: 726: 720: 717: 713: 712: 702: 699: 695: 691: 687: 683: 677: 674: 670: 666: 665: 658: 655: 649: 647: 645: 643: 639: 633: 630: 624: 621: 615: 612: 606: 603: 599: 594: 591: 578: 574: 567: 565: 563: 561: 557: 554: 553:Rule 14 IPREE 550: 545: 542: 528: 524: 518: 515: 512: 511: 505: 502: 496: 493: 490: 487: 482: 479: 476: 473: 468: 465: 462: 459: 454: 451: 447: 441: 438: 434: 429: 426: 422: 419: 414: 412: 408: 405: 402: 397: 394: 391: 388: 383: 380: 376: 371: 369: 365: 362: 359: 354: 351: 345: 337: 333: 327: 324: 317: 313: 310: 307: 304: 301: 298: 297: 293: 291: 289: 284: 281: 273: 271: 269: 266: 258: 256: 254: 251: 242: 240: 236: 232: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 182: 178: 174: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 152: 148: 144: 143: 142: 135: 133: 126: 124: 120: 113: 110: 107: 106: 105: 103: 102: 92: 90: 88: 82: 80: 76: 72: 69: 65: 61: 57: 48: 46: 44: 40: 36: 32: 28: 18: 1197: 1192: 1186: 1178: 912: 854: 835: 777:Rule 152(11) 772: 760:. Retrieved 755: 746: 733: 719: 710: 701: 676: 663: 661:S. Roberts, 657: 632: 623: 614: 605: 593: 581:. Retrieved 576: 544: 531:. Retrieved 526: 517: 509: 504: 495: 481: 467: 453: 440: 428: 396: 382: 353: 326: 277: 265:Rule 152(11) 262: 250:Rule 152(11) 246: 237: 233: 186: 139: 130: 121: 117: 98: 96: 83: 52: 24: 1448:validation 1423:Switzerland 1363:Netherlands 1071:Enforcement 953:(pdf 20 MB) 845:; see also 840:Rule 152(6) 762:November 8, 706:(in French) 533:26 December 486:Article 163 248:meaning of 68:Article 105 1442:Extension 1393:San Marino 1358:Montenegro 1343:Luxembourg 1158:Guidelines 1051:Opposition 947:(pdf 4 MB) 897:, section 865:, section 680:Decisions 346:References 243:Statistics 1338:Lithuania 1128:Espacenet 1039:Procedure 377:, point 5 336:prior art 229:The Hague 221:Stockholm 155:prior art 151:invention 99:European 60:applicant 1517:Category 1467:Cambodia 1408:Slovenia 1403:Slovakia 1383:Portugal 1258:Bulgaria 1080:Case law 294:See also 280:Rule 152 225:Taastrup 201:Helsinki 1499:Tunisia 1491:Morocco 1483:Moldova 1475:Georgia 1388:Romania 1318:Ireland 1313:Iceland 1308:Hungary 1298:Germany 1288:Finland 1283:Estonia 1278:Denmark 1263:Croatia 1253:Belgium 1248:Austria 1243:Albania 1123:epoline 694:D 43/07 690:D 17/07 686:D 12/07 583:3 March 308:(CEIPI) 197:Bristol 162:novelty 45:(EPO). 35:natural 1452:states 1428:Turkey 1418:Sweden 1398:Serbia 1378:Poland 1373:Norway 1353:Monaco 1328:Latvia 1303:Greece 1293:France 1268:Cyprus 1236:states 1061:Appeal 1018:Organs 941:(2013) 682:D 6/07 375:G 4/95 300:G 4/95 263:Under 209:Munich 205:Madrid 189:Berlin 147:claims 31:treaty 1413:Spain 1348:Malta 1323:Italy 874:, 2.5 579:. EPO 318:Notes 213:Paris 1153:Fees 904:viii 872:viii 764:2013 585:2017 551:and 535:2015 227:and 217:Rome 193:Bern 164:and 58:(as 25:The 21:EPO. 1502:(V) 1494:(V) 1486:(V) 1478:(V) 1470:(V) 1462:(E) 1450:(V) 1446:and 1444:(E) 920:iii 906:, 1 843:EPC 780:EPC 489:EPC 475:EPC 461:EPC 421:EPC 404:EPC 390:EPC 361:EPC 283:EPC 268:EPC 253:EPC 73:), 71:EPC 62:), 37:or 1519:: 820:^ 801:^ 786:^ 754:. 692:, 688:, 684:, 667:, 641:^ 575:. 559:^ 525:. 410:^ 367:^ 223:, 219:, 215:, 211:, 207:, 203:, 199:, 195:, 191:, 982:e 975:t 968:v 924:v 922:. 902:- 900:a 870:- 868:a 766:. 727:. 587:. 537:. 423:. 157:.

Index


European Patent Convention
treaty
natural
juristic person
European Patent Office
grant proceedings
applicant
opposition proceedings
Article 105
EPC
limitation and revocation proceedings
appeal proceedings
legal practitioner
patent attorney
claims
invention
prior art
novelty
inventive step
problem-and-solution approach
Patent Cooperation Treaty
Berlin
Bern
Bristol
Helsinki
Madrid
Munich
Paris
Rome

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑