232:. Political scientist Anna Abalkina had developed a method for identifying hijacked journal domains based on an analysis of the archives of clone journals. This method is based on the argument that fraudulent publishers recycle identical papers to create a fictitious archive for a hijacked journal. Methods used to locate or confirm hijacked statuses of journals include duplicated journal archives, identical website templates, growth in indexing, anomalous citations, and scholars’ comments. Abalkina created the Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker in partnership with Retraction Watch.
1012:
89:
211:. They estimated that scientific misconduct was more common than is reported. They also assessed that, despite recent scandals involving research misconduct, the academic community was not interested in exposing wrongdoing and scientific errors. However, all members of the academic community are responsible for the delays and lack of action.
42:
166:
to encourage this continuation and to increase the transparency of the retraction process. They observed that retractions of papers generally are not announced, that the reasons for retractions are not publicized, and that other researchers or the public who are unaware of the retraction may make
219:
Retraction Watch has demonstrated that retractions are more common than was previously thought. When
Retraction Watch was launched, Marcus "wondered if we'd have enough material". It had been estimated that about 80 papers were retracted annually. However, in its first year, the blog reported on
184:, and can "be the source of great stories that say a lot about how science is conducted". In January 2021, more than 50 studies have cited Retraction Watch as the scientific publishing community is exploring the impact of retracted papers. During the
177:. Although the paper was later retracted, its retraction was not reported in media outlets that had earlier reported its positive conclusions, with a company having been established on the basis of the ultimately retracted conclusions.
491:
192:
about the pandemic, with additional research undertaken to analyse the subsequent pollution of further research as retracted papers are cited and used within scholarly research.
715:
1047:
220:
approximately 200 retractions. In
October 2019 the Retraction Watch Database reached a milestone 20,000 entries As of January 2024, it contains over 50,000 entries.
189:
169:
241:
488:
622:
180:
Oransky and Marcus claim that retractions also provide a window into the self-correcting nature of science, can provide insight into cases of
976:
121:
953:
436:
248:. The database of retractions was funded by a $ 400,000 grant from the MacArthur Foundation in 2015. They have partnered with the
245:
637:
585:"Retracted Covid-19 papers and the levels of 'citation pollution': A preliminary analysis and directions for further research"
1042:
1037:
240:
Retraction Watch has been funded by a variety of sources, including donations and grants. They received grants from the
907:
821:
300:
459:
686:
847:
509:
275:
249:
162:
process for scholarly publications continues long after the publication date. They were motivated to launch
1032:
253:
933:
430:
252:, which is also funded by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, to create a retraction database on the
716:"Our database just reached a big milestone: 20,000 retractions. Will you help us with the next 20,000"
874:
557:
366:
200:
1017:
583:
Van Der Walt, Wynand; Willems, Kris; Friedrich, Wernher; Hatsu, Sylvester; Kirstin, Krauss (2020).
204:
196:
796:
778:
531:
270:
766:
128:
and on related topics. The blog was launched in August 2010 and is produced by science writers
949:
882:
418:
349:
280:
229:
185:
125:
941:
788:
659:
596:
454:
410:
339:
331:
181:
155:
875:"Meet Retraction Watch, the Blog That Points Out the Human Stains on the Scientific Record"
495:
1011:
167:
decisions based on invalid results. Oransky described an example of a paper published in
88:
1052:
945:
740:
691:
664:
344:
319:
41:
977:"Center for Open Science and The Center for Scientific Integrity Announce Partnership"
1026:
800:
655:
174:
934:"Chapter 19 - Publishing Ethics: An Interview With the Founders of Retraction Watch"
208:
129:
381:
188:, Retraction Watch maintained a separate list of retracted articles that added to
159:
792:
17:
932:
Markovac, Jasna; Kleinman, Molly; Englesbe, Michael, eds. (January 1, 2018).
886:
143:
422:
353:
398:
335:
304:
134:
600:
142:). Its parent organization is the Center for Scientific Integrity, a US
623:"Science Corrects Itself, Right? A Scandal at Stanford Says It Doesn't"
265:
584:
414:
783:
489:
Helping journalists track retractions: one year of
Retraction Watch
660:"3 Harvard Researchers Retract a Claim on the Aging of Stem Cells"
908:"From ScienceWriters: Retraction Watch receives $ 400,000 grant"
173:
that reported a potential role for a drug against some types of
117:
54:
1005:
638:"There's far more scientific fraud than anyone wants to admit"
81:
498:, Association of British Science Writers, August 20, 2011.
767:"Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive"
589:
228:
In 2022, Retraction Watch added a feature that tracks
103:
95:
76:
68:
60:
48:
397:Marcus, Adam; Oransky, Ivan (December 21, 2011).
848:"The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker"
170:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
636:Oransky, Ivan; Marcus, Adam (August 9, 2023).
621:Oransky, Ivan; Marcus, Adam (August 1, 2023).
508:Oransky, Ivan; Adam Marcus (August 3, 2010).
242:John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
8:
32:
483:
481:
479:
477:
301:"Searching for truth in published research"
203:, Oransky and Marcus co-authored op-eds in
195:In 2023, in the wake of the resignation of
154:In 2011, Oransky and Marcus pointed out in
1010:
87:
40:
31:
27:Blog covering scientific paper retractions
1048:Media analysis organizations and websites
782:
558:"Retracted coronavirus (COVID-19) papers"
343:
244:, the Helmsley Charitable Trust, and the
291:
873:Kolowich, Steve (September 25, 2015).
428:
510:"Why write a blog about retractions?"
448:
446:
140:Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News
7:
532:"Papers that cite Retraction Watch"
453:Silverman, Craig (August 9, 2010).
946:10.1016/B978-0-12-809969-8.00019-X
714:Oransky, Ivan (October 17, 2019).
299:Strauss, Stephen (April 7, 2011).
132:(Former Vice President, Editorial
25:
938:Medical and Scientific Publishing
879:The Chronicle of Higher Education
246:Laura and John Arnold Foundation
320:"Shedding light on retractions"
72:Center for Scientific Integrity
765:Abalkina, Anna (August 2021).
1:
1018:Center for Scientic Integrity
435:: CS1 maint: date and year (
138:) and Adam Marcus (editor of
687:"Making science transparent"
940:. Academic Press: 179–186.
741:"Retraction Watch Database"
387:Retrieved February 5, 2015.
372:Retrieved February 5, 2015.
1069:
793:10.1007/s11192-021-04056-0
460:Columbia Journalism Review
399:"The paper is not sacred"
39:
224:Hijacked journal tracker
146:nonprofit organization.
494:April 19, 2012, at the
276:Center for Open Science
250:Center for Open Science
745:retractiondatabase.org
625:. Scientific American.
254:Open Science Framework
1043:Scientific misconduct
1038:Medical controversies
336:10.1503/cmaj.109-3827
658:(October 14, 2010).
367:Ivan Oransky Bio on
201:Marc Tessier-Lavigne
150:Motivation and scope
455:"Retraction Action"
382:Adam Marcus Bio on
205:Scientific American
197:Stanford University
36:
512:. Retraction Watch
318:Collier R (2011).
271:Replication crisis
695:. August 12, 2011
409:(7378): 449–450.
281:Journal hijacking
230:journal hijacking
186:COVID-19 pandemic
126:scientific papers
111:
110:
61:Available in
16:(Redirected from
1060:
1014:
1009:
1008:
1006:Official website
992:
991:
989:
987:
973:
967:
966:
964:
962:
929:
923:
922:
920:
918:
904:
898:
897:
895:
893:
870:
864:
863:
861:
859:
852:Retraction Watch
844:
838:
837:
835:
833:
826:Retraction Watch
818:
812:
811:
809:
807:
786:
777:(8): 7123–7148.
762:
756:
755:
753:
751:
737:
731:
730:
728:
726:
720:Retraction Watch
711:
705:
704:
702:
700:
683:
677:
676:
674:
672:
652:
646:
645:
633:
627:
626:
618:
612:
611:
609:
607:
580:
574:
573:
571:
569:
564:. April 29, 2020
562:Retraction Watch
554:
548:
547:
545:
543:
538:. March 28, 2020
536:Retraction Watch
528:
522:
521:
519:
517:
505:
499:
485:
472:
471:
469:
467:
450:
441:
440:
434:
426:
394:
388:
384:Retraction Watch
379:
373:
369:Retraction Watch
364:
358:
357:
347:
315:
309:
308:
296:
182:scientific fraud
164:Retraction Watch
120:that reports on
114:Retraction Watch
91:
86:
83:
44:
37:
34:Retraction Watch
21:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1023:
1022:
1004:
1003:
1000:
995:
985:
983:
975:
974:
970:
960:
958:
956:
931:
930:
926:
916:
914:
906:
905:
901:
891:
889:
872:
871:
867:
857:
855:
846:
845:
841:
831:
829:
820:
819:
815:
805:
803:
764:
763:
759:
749:
747:
739:
738:
734:
724:
722:
713:
712:
708:
698:
696:
685:
684:
680:
670:
668:
654:
653:
649:
635:
634:
630:
620:
619:
615:
605:
603:
582:
581:
577:
567:
565:
556:
555:
551:
541:
539:
530:
529:
525:
515:
513:
507:
506:
502:
496:Wayback Machine
486:
475:
465:
463:
452:
451:
444:
427:
415:10.1038/480449a
396:
395:
391:
380:
376:
365:
361:
317:
316:
312:
298:
297:
293:
289:
262:
256:.
238:
226:
217:
152:
82:retractionwatch
80:
51:
28:
23:
22:
18:RetractionWatch
15:
12:
11:
5:
1066:
1064:
1056:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1015:
999:
998:External links
996:
994:
993:
968:
954:
924:
899:
865:
854:. May 30, 2022
839:
828:. May 30, 2022
813:
771:Scientometrics
757:
732:
706:
692:Ottawa Citizen
678:
665:New York Times
656:Wade, Nicholas
647:
628:
613:
575:
549:
523:
500:
473:
442:
389:
374:
359:
310:
290:
288:
285:
284:
283:
278:
273:
268:
261:
258:
237:
234:
225:
222:
216:
213:
190:misinformation
175:breast cancers
151:
148:
109:
108:
105:
101:
100:
97:
93:
92:
78:
74:
73:
70:
66:
65:
62:
58:
57:
52:
49:
46:
45:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1065:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1033:Science blogs
1031:
1030:
1028:
1019:
1016:
1013:
1007:
1002:
1001:
997:
982:
978:
972:
969:
957:
955:9780128099698
951:
947:
943:
939:
935:
928:
925:
913:
909:
903:
900:
888:
884:
880:
876:
869:
866:
853:
849:
843:
840:
827:
823:
817:
814:
802:
798:
794:
790:
785:
780:
776:
772:
768:
761:
758:
746:
742:
736:
733:
725:September 21,
721:
717:
710:
707:
694:
693:
688:
682:
679:
667:
666:
661:
657:
651:
648:
643:
639:
632:
629:
624:
617:
614:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
579:
576:
563:
559:
553:
550:
537:
533:
527:
524:
511:
504:
501:
497:
493:
490:
487:Kelly Oakes,
484:
482:
480:
478:
474:
462:
461:
456:
449:
447:
443:
438:
432:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
393:
390:
386:
385:
378:
375:
371:
370:
363:
360:
355:
351:
346:
341:
337:
333:
330:(7): E385-6.
329:
325:
321:
314:
311:
306:
302:
295:
292:
286:
282:
279:
277:
274:
272:
269:
267:
264:
263:
259:
257:
255:
251:
247:
243:
235:
233:
231:
223:
221:
214:
212:
210:
206:
202:
198:
193:
191:
187:
183:
178:
176:
172:
171:
165:
161:
157:
149:
147:
145:
141:
137:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
85:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
56:
53:
47:
43:
38:
35:
30:
19:
984:. Retrieved
980:
971:
959:. Retrieved
937:
927:
915:. Retrieved
912:www.nasw.org
911:
902:
890:. Retrieved
878:
868:
856:. Retrieved
851:
842:
830:. Retrieved
825:
816:
804:. Retrieved
774:
770:
760:
748:. Retrieved
744:
735:
723:. Retrieved
719:
709:
697:. Retrieved
690:
681:
669:. Retrieved
663:
650:
642:The Guardian
641:
631:
616:
604:. Retrieved
601:10962/167732
592:
588:
578:
566:. Retrieved
561:
552:
540:. Retrieved
535:
526:
514:. Retrieved
503:
464:. Retrieved
458:
431:cite journal
406:
402:
392:
383:
377:
368:
362:
327:
323:
313:
294:
239:
227:
218:
209:The Guardian
194:
179:
168:
163:
153:
139:
133:
130:Ivan Oransky
113:
112:
50:Type of site
33:
29:
986:October 11,
961:October 11,
917:October 11,
892:October 11,
699:October 25,
671:October 25,
606:January 13,
568:January 13,
542:January 13,
516:October 25,
466:October 25,
160:peer review
122:retractions
107:August 2010
1027:Categories
784:2101.01224
287:References
199:president
96:Commercial
887:0009-5982
858:March 31,
832:March 31,
822:"Methods"
806:March 31,
801:230523913
158:that the
144:501(c)(3)
750:April 6,
492:Archived
423:22193084
354:21444620
305:CBC News
260:See also
135:Medscape
104:Launched
345:3080553
266:PubPeer
236:Funding
64:English
981:cos.io
952:
885:
799:
421:
403:Nature
352:
342:
215:Impact
156:Nature
1053:Error
797:S2CID
779:arXiv
595:(4).
116:is a
69:Owner
988:2019
963:2019
950:ISBN
919:2019
894:2019
883:ISSN
860:2023
834:2023
808:2023
752:2024
727:2020
701:2011
673:2011
608:2021
570:2021
544:2021
518:2011
468:2011
437:link
419:PMID
350:PMID
324:CMAJ
207:and
118:blog
84:.com
55:Blog
942:doi
789:doi
775:126
597:hdl
411:doi
407:480
340:PMC
332:doi
328:183
124:of
77:URL
1029::
979:.
948:.
936:.
910:.
881:.
877:.
850:.
824:.
795:.
787:.
773:.
769:.
743:.
718:.
689:.
662:.
640:.
591:.
587:.
560:.
534:.
476:^
457:.
445:^
433:}}
429:{{
417:.
405:.
401:.
348:.
338:.
326:.
322:.
303:.
99:No
990:.
965:.
944::
921:.
896:.
862:.
836:.
810:.
791::
781::
754:.
729:.
703:.
675:.
644:.
610:.
599::
593:3
572:.
546:.
520:.
470:.
439:)
425:.
413::
356:.
334::
307:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
