Knowledge (XXG)

Rohit Sagar v. State of Uttarakhand

Source đź“ť

29: 190:
a formal complaint with both the Senior Superintendent of Police of Udham Singh Nagar district and the Station House Officer of Police Station No. 2, Rudrapur. However, as there has been no proactive action taken by the police authorities to safeguard the couple's lives and property, they have initiated a writ petition in the Uttarakhand High Court to seek a protective order.
189:
Rohit Sagar and his partner Mohit Goyal, who are in a same-sex relationship, reside together in Rudrapur, Uttarakhand. However, they have faced resistance to their relationship from their respective families. Due to ongoing threats of serious repercussions from their family members, the couple lodged
198:
The Bench upheld that adults who have attained the age of majority hold an inherent right to choose their life partners, even when confronted with objections from their families, and thus, the families of the couple should not be allowed to intimidate or harm the petitioners. Consequently, the Bench
1223: 266:, acknowledging the tate's dual obligation pertaining to sexual orientation—preventing discrimination and actively safeguarding the rights of same-sex couples, thereby contributing to the formation of a consistent legal precedent concerning sexual orientation and rights. 199:
instructed the Senior Superintendent of Police for District Udham Singh Nagar to promptly ensure police protection for both the petitioners, encompassing not only their lives but also the safeguarding of their property.
250:
explicitly references the constitutional right to privacy, providing added support for safeguarding against unwarranted intrusions, in addition to offering protection against physical threats and violations.
236:
seeking protection against threat to their life and liberty by family members and the immediate society. A two-judge Bench of the Allahabad High Court, guided by the Supreme Court's precedent in
348: 975: 537: 242:, noted that sexual orientation constitutes an inherent aspect of the constitutional rights to liberty, dignity, privacy, personal autonomy, and equality. In contrast to the case of 285: 1176: 381: 596: 1714: 1098: 1010: 280: 883: 580: 798: 967: 754: 588: 1118: 1108: 181:, established the right of legal adults to select their own partners and instructed the police to ensure the couple's safety and safeguard their property. 1709: 1387: 1181: 1113: 1045: 838: 770: 635: 228: 221: 627: 523: 1882: 481: 1897: 1103: 1062: 830: 202:
The verdict of the Bench noticeably lacks legal precedents, thorough analysis, and comprehensive reasoning to substantiate its conclusions.
1927: 1140: 619: 546: 495: 290: 238: 1942: 1261: 1246: 1166: 944: 854: 814: 746: 710: 679: 561: 1215: 846: 699: 651: 572: 1251: 1191: 735: 726: 608: 530: 1865: 1531: 421: 81: 1892: 1875: 1860: 1517: 119:
The adults have a fundamental right to choose their own life-partners, despite the opposition voiced by the family members.
1937: 1922: 1829: 1321: 956: 382:""Major Persons Have A Fundamental Right To Choose Life-Partners": Ut'khand HC Grants Protection To Live-In Gay Couple" 317: 1932: 1744: 1657: 1228: 1038: 936: 822: 687: 1809: 1759: 1580: 1799: 1082: 904: 875: 790: 671: 443: 1870: 1774: 1754: 1002: 127: 100: 1559: 1779: 1594: 1482: 1423: 1031: 425: 178: 39: 1887: 1804: 1794: 1769: 1764: 1510: 1410: 1401: 1077: 781: 150: 1819: 1789: 1685: 1054: 477: 275: 233: 1824: 1784: 1671: 1524: 1503: 1356: 1351: 1346: 1281: 1749: 1739: 1650: 1449: 1444: 1418: 1311: 1256: 1132: 660: 1839: 1814: 1629: 1601: 1636: 1587: 1566: 1545: 1678: 1552: 1538: 1361: 1615: 1475: 1439: 1296: 1238: 895: 1916: 991: 1834: 1664: 1622: 1341: 1331: 1150: 146: 1643: 1608: 1366: 1291: 1201: 515: 349:"Give security to gay couple facing opposition from families, orders high court" 318:"Uttarakhand HC Orders Police Protection to Gay Couple in Live-In Relationship" 1844: 1729: 1301: 1286: 28: 1692: 1336: 1719: 1489: 1468: 1316: 866: 1023: 496:"Poonam Rani and Ors. v. State of UP and Ors. Writ C No. 1213 of 2021" 1326: 444:"Allahabad HC Asks Shamli SP To Give Protection To a Same-Sex Couple" 254:
While ordering police protection for the couple, in contrast to the
1496: 1371: 1306: 1573: 1027: 519: 417:
Rohit Sagar & Anor. versus State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
473:
Sultana Mirza & Anr. v. State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
1247:
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015
976:
Karnataka Sexual Minorities Forum v. State of Karnataka
281:
Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal (2022)
82: 1252:
Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act 2021
232:, a same-sex couple residing together, approached the 286:
Adhila Nasarin v. State Commissioner of Police (2022)
1177:
Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
1853: 1728: 1702: 1460: 1432: 1409: 1400: 1380: 1274: 1237: 1214: 1190: 1165: 1158: 1149: 1131: 1091: 1070: 1061: 990: 955: 928: 919: 894: 865: 780: 769: 734: 725: 698: 659: 650: 607: 597:
National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
560: 553: 140: 123: 113: 96: 91: 76: 68: 45: 35: 21: 1003:Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union Of India 1715:KASHISH Mumbai International Queer Film Festival 1011:Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal 262:case drew upon the Supreme Court's precedent in 1224:HIV and AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017 884:Arun Kumar v. Inspector General of Registration 581:Arun Kumar v. Inspector General of Registration 799:Adhila Nasarin v. State Commissioner of Police 229:Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) 1039: 968:Vyjayanti Vasanta Mogli v. State of Telangana 755:Chanchal Bhattacharya v. State of West Bengal 589:Chanchal Bhattacharya v. State of West Bengal 531: 8: 291:Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) 239:Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018) 1406: 1377: 1162: 1155: 1067: 1046: 1032: 1024: 925: 777: 731: 656: 557: 538: 524: 516: 27: 18: 1710:Chennai International Queer Film Festival 422: Writ Petition (CRL) No. 2254 of 2021 1388:National Council for Transgender Persons 1182:Rights of Transgender Persons Bill, 2014 839:Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh 636:Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi 302: 260:Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh 248:Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh 222:Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh 216:Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh 628:Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation 1898:Zoroastrianism and sexual orientation 831:Poonam Rani v. State of Uttar Pradesh 467: 465: 463: 438: 436: 434: 130: 103: 7: 1202:Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code 620:Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India 411: 409: 407: 405: 403: 401: 375: 373: 371: 369: 343: 341: 339: 337: 312: 310: 308: 306: 264:Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India 1883:Bahá'í Faith and sexual orientation 1861:Christianity and sexual orientation 807:Rohit Sagar v. State of Uttarakhand 256:Rohit Sagar v. State of Uttarakhand 244:Rohit Sagar v. State of Uttarakhand 22:Rohit Sagar v. State of Uttarakhand 945:S Sushma v. Commissioner of Police 855:Sreeja S v. Commissioner of Police 815:S Sushma v. Commissioner of Police 747:S Sushma v. Commissioner of Police 711:S Sushma v. Commissioner of Police 680:S Sushma v. Commissioner of Police 14: 847:Chinmayee Jena v. State of Odisha 573:Chinmayee Jena v. State of Odisha 476:, WRIT-C. No. 17394 of 2020 ( 1257:Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 1866:Buddhism and sexual orientation 1532:Ek Ladki Ko Dekha Toh Aisa Laga 380:Upadhyay, Sparsh (2021-12-19). 163: 134: 107: 54: 1893:Sikhism and sexual orientation 1876:LGBT themes in Hindu mythology 1518:Chitrangada: The Crowning Wish 494:Shukla, Surabhi (2021-02-10). 170: 61: 1: 1141:LGBT Rights Case Law in India 547:LGBT Rights Case Law in India 1322:Naz Foundation (India) Trust 1262:Adoption Regulations of 2022 166:versus State of Uttarakhand 57:versus State of Uttarakhand 1928:Indian LGBT rights case law 1658:Shubh Mangal Zyada Saavdhan 1229:Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 937:XYZ v. State of Maharashtra 823:Ujjawal v. State of Haryana 688:Queerala v. State of Kerala 480: 2 November 2020), 167: 160: 58: 51: 16:Indian LGBT Rights Case Law 1959: 1943:High courts of India cases 219: 905:Supriyo v. Union of India 876:Supriyo v. Union of India 791:Devu G v. State of Kerala 672:Devu G v. State of Kerala 145: 118: 26: 1871:Hinduism and LGBT topics 1092:Relationship recognition 428: 16 December 2021). 258:case, the Bench in the 226:In the related case of 1595:Margarita with a Straw 1483:Angry Indian Goddesses 1424:Homosexuality in India 426:Uttarakhand High Court 179:Uttarakhand High Court 40:Uttarakhand High Court 1888:LGBT people and Islam 151:Same-sex Relationship 1938:2021 in LGBT history 1923:LGBT rights in India 1055:LGBT rights in India 478:Allahabad High Court 276:LGBT rights in India 234:Allahabad High Court 194:Opinion of the Court 1504:Arekti Premer Golpo 1357:Sappho for Equality 1352:Samabhavana Society 1347:Sahodari Foundation 1282:Fifty Shades of Gay 929:Police Interactions 147:Cohabitation Rights 1933:2021 in Indian law 1312:Lawyers Collective 246:, the judgment in 177:a decision of the 1910: 1909: 1906: 1905: 1637:Romil & Jugal 1630:Randu Penkuttikal 1602:Memories in March 1567:Kapoor & Sons 1396: 1395: 1381:Government bodies 1270: 1269: 1210: 1209: 1127: 1126: 1021: 1020: 986: 985: 915: 914: 765: 764: 721: 720: 646: 645: 500:Law and Sexuality 156: 155: 133:and N. S. Dhanik 106:and N. S. Dhanik 1950: 1407: 1378: 1163: 1156: 1068: 1048: 1041: 1034: 1025: 926: 778: 732: 657: 558: 540: 533: 526: 517: 510: 509: 507: 506: 491: 485: 475: 469: 458: 457: 455: 454: 440: 429: 419: 413: 396: 395: 393: 392: 377: 364: 363: 361: 360: 345: 332: 331: 329: 328: 314: 211:High Court Cases 172: 169: 165: 162: 136: 132: 109: 105: 92:Court membership 87: 84: 72:16 December 2021 63: 60: 56: 53: 31: 19: 1958: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1902: 1849: 1731: 1724: 1698: 1679:The Pink Mirror 1539:Evening Shadows 1456: 1428: 1392: 1376: 1362:Srishti Madurai 1266: 1233: 1206: 1193: 1186: 1168: 1145: 1123: 1087: 1057: 1052: 1022: 1017: 993: 982: 958: 951: 921: 911: 890: 861: 772: 761: 737: 717: 701: 694: 662: 642: 610: 603: 563: 549: 544: 514: 513: 504: 502: 493: 492: 488: 471: 470: 461: 452: 450: 442: 441: 432: 415: 414: 399: 390: 388: 379: 378: 367: 358: 356: 353:Hindustan Times 347: 346: 335: 326: 324: 316: 315: 304: 299: 272: 224: 218: 213: 208: 196: 187: 83:W. P. (CRL) No. 80: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1956: 1954: 1946: 1945: 1940: 1935: 1930: 1925: 1915: 1914: 1908: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1901: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1885: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1868: 1863: 1857: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1848: 1847: 1842: 1837: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1736: 1734: 1726: 1725: 1723: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1706: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1697: 1696: 1689: 1682: 1675: 1668: 1661: 1654: 1647: 1640: 1633: 1626: 1619: 1616:Njan Marykutty 1612: 1605: 1598: 1591: 1584: 1581:Made in Heaven 1577: 1570: 1563: 1556: 1549: 1542: 1535: 1528: 1521: 1514: 1511:Bombay Talkies 1507: 1500: 1493: 1486: 1479: 1472: 1464: 1462: 1458: 1457: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1447: 1440:Rainbow Awards 1436: 1434: 1430: 1429: 1427: 1426: 1421: 1415: 1413: 1404: 1398: 1397: 1394: 1393: 1391: 1390: 1384: 1382: 1375: 1374: 1369: 1364: 1359: 1354: 1349: 1344: 1339: 1334: 1329: 1324: 1319: 1314: 1309: 1304: 1299: 1297:Humsafar Trust 1294: 1289: 1284: 1278: 1276: 1272: 1271: 1268: 1267: 1265: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1249: 1243: 1241: 1235: 1234: 1232: 1231: 1226: 1220: 1218: 1212: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1205: 1204: 1198: 1196: 1188: 1187: 1185: 1184: 1179: 1173: 1171: 1160: 1153: 1147: 1146: 1144: 1143: 1137: 1135: 1129: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1122: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1101: 1099:Andhra Pradesh 1095: 1093: 1089: 1088: 1086: 1085: 1080: 1074: 1072: 1065: 1059: 1058: 1053: 1051: 1050: 1043: 1036: 1028: 1019: 1018: 1016: 1015: 1007: 998: 996: 988: 987: 984: 983: 981: 980: 972: 963: 961: 959:Discrimination 953: 952: 950: 949: 941: 932: 930: 923: 917: 916: 913: 912: 910: 909: 900: 898: 892: 891: 889: 888: 880: 871: 869: 863: 862: 860: 859: 851: 843: 835: 827: 819: 811: 803: 795: 786: 784: 775: 767: 766: 763: 762: 760: 759: 751: 742: 740: 729: 723: 722: 719: 718: 716: 715: 706: 704: 696: 695: 693: 692: 684: 676: 667: 665: 654: 648: 647: 644: 643: 641: 640: 632: 624: 615: 613: 605: 604: 602: 601: 593: 585: 577: 568: 566: 555: 551: 550: 545: 543: 542: 535: 528: 520: 512: 511: 486: 459: 430: 397: 386:www.livelaw.in 365: 333: 301: 300: 298: 295: 294: 293: 288: 283: 278: 271: 268: 220:Main article: 217: 214: 212: 209: 207: 204: 195: 192: 186: 183: 154: 153: 143: 142: 138: 137: 125: 121: 120: 116: 115: 111: 110: 98: 97:Judges sitting 94: 93: 89: 88: 78: 74: 73: 70: 66: 65: 47: 46:Full case name 43: 42: 37: 33: 32: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1955: 1944: 1941: 1939: 1936: 1934: 1931: 1929: 1926: 1924: 1921: 1920: 1918: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1869: 1867: 1864: 1862: 1859: 1858: 1856: 1852: 1846: 1843: 1841: 1838: 1836: 1833: 1831: 1828: 1826: 1823: 1821: 1818: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1808: 1806: 1803: 1801: 1798: 1796: 1793: 1791: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1781: 1778: 1776: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1766: 1763: 1761: 1758: 1756: 1753: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1738: 1737: 1735: 1733: 1727: 1721: 1718: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1708: 1707: 1705: 1701: 1695: 1694: 1690: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1667: 1666: 1662: 1660: 1659: 1655: 1653: 1652: 1648: 1646: 1645: 1641: 1639: 1638: 1634: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1625: 1624: 1620: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1611: 1610: 1606: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1590: 1589: 1588:Mango Soufflé 1585: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1576: 1575: 1571: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1541: 1540: 1536: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1520: 1519: 1515: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1492: 1491: 1487: 1485: 1484: 1480: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1465: 1463: 1459: 1451: 1448: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1435: 1431: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1416: 1414: 1412: 1408: 1405: 1403: 1399: 1389: 1386: 1385: 1383: 1379: 1373: 1370: 1368: 1365: 1363: 1360: 1358: 1355: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1345: 1343: 1340: 1338: 1335: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1320: 1318: 1315: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1305: 1303: 1300: 1298: 1295: 1293: 1290: 1288: 1285: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1277: 1275:Organisations 1273: 1263: 1260: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1250: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1242: 1240: 1236: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1221: 1219: 1217: 1213: 1203: 1200: 1199: 1197: 1195: 1189: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1172: 1170: 1164: 1161: 1157: 1154: 1152: 1148: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1136: 1134: 1130: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1096: 1094: 1090: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1075: 1073: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1049: 1044: 1042: 1037: 1035: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1013: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1000: 999: 997: 995: 989: 978: 977: 973: 970: 969: 965: 964: 962: 960: 957:Institutional 954: 947: 946: 942: 939: 938: 934: 933: 931: 927: 924: 918: 907: 906: 902: 901: 899: 897: 893: 886: 885: 881: 878: 877: 873: 872: 870: 868: 864: 857: 856: 852: 849: 848: 844: 841: 840: 836: 833: 832: 828: 825: 824: 820: 817: 816: 812: 809: 808: 804: 801: 800: 796: 793: 792: 788: 787: 785: 783: 779: 776: 774: 768: 757: 756: 752: 749: 748: 744: 743: 741: 739: 733: 730: 728: 724: 713: 712: 708: 707: 705: 703: 697: 690: 689: 685: 682: 681: 677: 674: 673: 669: 668: 666: 664: 658: 655: 653: 649: 638: 637: 633: 630: 629: 625: 622: 621: 617: 616: 614: 612: 606: 599: 598: 594: 591: 590: 586: 583: 582: 578: 575: 574: 570: 569: 567: 565: 559: 556: 552: 548: 541: 536: 534: 529: 527: 522: 521: 518: 501: 497: 490: 487: 483: 479: 474: 468: 466: 464: 460: 449: 445: 439: 437: 435: 431: 427: 423: 418: 412: 410: 408: 406: 404: 402: 398: 387: 383: 376: 374: 372: 370: 366: 354: 350: 344: 342: 340: 338: 334: 323: 319: 313: 311: 309: 307: 303: 296: 292: 289: 287: 284: 282: 279: 277: 274: 273: 269: 267: 265: 261: 257: 252: 249: 245: 241: 240: 235: 231: 230: 223: 215: 210: 206:Related Cases 205: 203: 200: 193: 191: 184: 182: 180: 176: 173: 152: 148: 144: 139: 129: 128:R. S. Chauhan 126: 122: 117: 114:Case opinions 112: 102: 101:R. S. Chauhan 99: 95: 90: 86: 79: 75: 71: 67: 64: 48: 44: 41: 38: 34: 30: 25: 20: 1691: 1684: 1677: 1672:Super Deluxe 1670: 1663: 1656: 1649: 1642: 1635: 1628: 1621: 1614: 1607: 1600: 1593: 1586: 1579: 1572: 1565: 1558: 1551: 1544: 1537: 1530: 1523: 1516: 1509: 1502: 1495: 1488: 1481: 1474: 1467: 1342:Sahayathrika 1332:PLUS Kolkata 1159:Legal status 1009: 1001: 974: 966: 943: 935: 903: 882: 874: 853: 845: 837: 829: 821: 813: 806: 805: 797: 789: 782:Cohabitation 771:Relationship 753: 745: 709: 686: 678: 670: 634: 626: 618: 595: 587: 579: 571: 554:Legal status 503:. Retrieved 499: 489: 472: 451:. Retrieved 447: 416: 389:. Retrieved 385: 357:. Retrieved 355:. 2021-12-16 352: 325:. Retrieved 321: 263: 259: 255: 253: 247: 243: 237: 227: 225: 201: 197: 188: 174: 159:Rohit Sagar 158: 157: 85:2254 of 2021 50:Rohit Sagar 49: 1755:Bhubaneswar 1651:Sheer Qorma 1609:Nagarkirtan 1367:Udaan Trust 1292:Good As You 1194:Orientation 922:Enforcement 611:Orientation 124:Decision by 1917:Categories 1780:Jamshedpur 1760:Chandigarh 1302:Indradhanu 1287:Gay Bombay 1239:Parenthood 1216:Healthcare 1119:Tamil Nadu 1083:Tamil Nadu 994:Discussion 896:Parenthood 773:and Family 702:Healthcare 661:Conversion 652:Healthcare 505:2023-08-29 453:2021-06-09 391:2023-08-29 359:2023-08-29 327:2023-08-29 297:References 185:Background 1795:Hyderabad 1745:Bengaluru 1740:Ahmedabad 1693:Unfreedom 1337:Queerythm 1133:Judgments 1109:Karnataka 992:Ancillary 738:Education 736:Inclusive 727:Education 700:Inclusive 1854:Religion 1790:Guwahati 1770:Dehradun 1720:Koovagam 1686:Time Out 1490:Antharam 1469:68 Pages 1317:Nazariya 1169:Identity 1151:Statutes 867:Marriage 564:Identity 448:The Wire 322:The Wire 270:See also 141:Keywords 77:Citation 1820:Madurai 1815:Lucknow 1810:Kolkata 1785:Gurgaon 1765:Chennai 1732:Marches 1525:Dostana 1476:Aligarh 1411:History 1402:Culture 663:therapy 175:(2021), 69:Decided 1835:Panaji 1830:Nagpur 1825:Mumbai 1800:Jaipur 1750:Bhopal 1730:Pride 1703:Events 1433:Awards 1327:Orinam 1192:Sexual 1167:Gender 1114:Kerala 1078:Kerala 1071:Rights 1063:States 1014:(2022) 1006:(2017) 979:(2017) 971:(2023) 948:(2021) 940:(2023) 908:(2023) 887:(2019) 879:(2023) 858:(2018) 850:(2020) 842:(2020) 834:(2021) 826:(2021) 818:(2021) 810:(2021) 802:(2022) 794:(2023) 758:(2015) 750:(2021) 714:(2021) 691:(2020) 683:(2021) 675:(2023) 639:(2009) 631:(2013) 623:(2018) 609:Sexual 600:(2014) 592:(2015) 584:(2019) 576:(2020) 562:Gender 424: ( 420:, 1840:Patna 1805:Kochi 1775:Delhi 1665:Sisak 1623:Qissa 1497:Aruvi 1461:Media 1419:Hijra 1372:XUKIA 1307:LABIA 168:& 161:& 59:& 52:& 36:Court 1845:Pune 1644:Shab 1574:Loev 1560:I Am 1546:Fire 1450:2024 1445:2023 482:Text 171:Ors. 164:Anr. 62:Ors. 55:Anr. 1553:Goa 1104:Goa 920:Law 1919:: 498:. 462:^ 446:. 433:^ 400:^ 384:. 368:^ 351:. 336:^ 320:. 305:^ 149:, 131:CJ 104:CJ 1047:e 1040:t 1033:v 539:e 532:t 525:v 508:. 484:. 456:. 394:. 362:. 330:. 135:J 108:J

Index


Uttarakhand High Court
W. P. (CRL) No. 2254 of 2021
R. S. Chauhan
R. S. Chauhan
Cohabitation Rights
Same-sex Relationship
Uttarakhand High Court
Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020)
Allahabad High Court
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)
LGBT rights in India
Deepika Singh v. Central Administrative Tribunal (2022)
Adhila Nasarin v. State Commissioner of Police (2022)
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India (2018)




"Uttarakhand HC Orders Police Protection to Gay Couple in Live-In Relationship"




"Give security to gay couple facing opposition from families, orders high court"



Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑