221:
Soo Chung asked
Pearson to return the following day. Pearson returned the next morning on May 7, where the Chungs presented him with a pair of charcoal gray pants. Pearson insisted that the pants were not his, contrary to the dry cleaner's records, tags, and his receipt, and refused to accept them. Pearson demanded what he claimed to be the price of the pants as compensation, an amount of over $ 1,000, which the Chungs refused. As a result, Pearson filed suit in the
252:", and $ 15,000 which he claimed would be the cost to rent a car every weekend to drive to another dry cleaning service. The remaining $ 51.5 million would be used to help similarly dissatisfied D.C. consumers sue businesses. Pearson also re-focused his lawsuit from the missing pants to the removal of window signs for "Satisfaction Guaranteed" and "Same Day Service". Pearson claimed the signs represented
225:. The judge to whom the case was presented decided to bring it to trial on the basis of two of Pearson's claims. The first claim was the issue of the ownership by Pearson of the presented pair of pants. The second claim was on the issue of signs posted outside the business, advertising "Same Day Service" and "Satisfaction Guaranteed", which Pearson claimed to be misleading.
324:
dismissed
Pearson's May 2008 lawsuit, ruling the District of Columbia had not broken the law by declining to reappoint him as an administrative law judge. Pearson had maintained in the suit that the failure to reappoint him to the ten-year term was in part intended as retaliation for his suit against
311:
It was revealed on August 2, 2007, that a panel recommended
Pearson not be given a ten-year term as an administrative law judge after his initial two-year term expired mid-2007, in part because his suit against Mr. Chung demonstrated a lack of "judicial temperament". Pearson was appointed in 2005 and
153:
called Custom
Cleaners, operated by Jin, Soo, and Ki Chung. When the pants were returned to him several days later, Pearson insisted that the pants he was presented with were not the pants he initially dropped off, and accused the Chungs of losing his pants. Pearson demanded to be compensated $ 1,000
375:
DC Board of
Professional Responsibility issued a 90-day suspension from legal practice against Pearson for engaging in frivolous litigation and thereby interfering with the administration of justice. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals upheld the suspension in June 2020, observing that Pearson
260:
would be misled by them, and that a reasonable person would not see the signs as an unconditional promise. The Chungs' lawyer portrayed
Pearson as a bitter, financially insolvent man; under questioning, Pearson admitted that, at the start of the court case, he had only $ 1000–2000 in the bank due to
220:
When
Pearson returned on May 5 to pick up his pants, Soo Chung informed him that his pants were not ready and had been sent to another store they owned by mistake. Soo Chung promised to have them ready the following morning, but when Pearson returned on May 6, the pants "still had not been located".
489:
suits, all of which he needed altered because they no longer fit him. Throughout the month of April 2005, Pearson brought three pairs of suit pants to Custom
Cleaners, as well as a pair of gray slacks that did not belong to a suit. Disregarding the pants at the center of the case, Pearson's other
228:
The Chungs were reportedly considering moving back to South Korea. After an outpouring of support for the Chungs from members of the public, a website was set up to accept donations for the Chungs' legal defense. Over time, the Chungs presented three settlement offers in the amounts of $ 3,000, $
216:
and did not speak fluent
English. The pants that Pearson delivered belonged to a blue and maroon suit that he owned, and were described by him as being gray with "blue and red stripes on them". Pearson requested his pants be ready for pickup two days later on May 5, which Soo Chung, who took his
328:
The Chungs moved to recover $ 83,000 in attorneys' fees and to impose sanctions, but withdrew the motion after recovering their costs through fund-raising. The Chungs stated that they did so in the hopes of persuading
Pearson to stop litigating, but on August 14, 2007, Pearson filed a notice of
312:
stood to lose his $ 100,512 salary if a hearing upheld that decision. On October 22, a D.C. commission voted against reappointing Pearson to the bench of the Office of Administrative Hearings. On November 14, it was confirmed that Pearson had lost his job by not being affirmed for an extension.
440:
On September 19, 2007, citing a loss of revenue and emotional strain from the lawsuit, the Chungs announced they had closed and sold the dry cleaning shop involved in the dispute. They still owned another dry cleaning shop and said they would be focusing their attention and resources on that.
308:", and had failed to address his legal claims. Pearson stated he believed the court had imposed its own conditional interpretation of "satisfaction guaranteed", rather than what Pearson believes is an offer of unconditional and unambiguous satisfaction. The court denied the motion.
360:
by the full nine-judge court. On March 2, 2009, the appeals court denied the petition. Pearson's final option was to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case. The 90-day deadline for seeking Supreme Court review elapsed without Pearson filing a petition for
315:
Roy Pearson filed suit against Washington, D.C., on May 2, 2008, claiming that he had been wrongfully dismissed for exposing corruption within the Office of Administrative Hearings. Pearson sought $ 1 million in compensation for lost wages and
275:
and the Chungs being represented by attorney Chris Manning. The trial drew a "standing-room-only" crowd. Pearson broke down in tears during an explanation about his frustration after losing his pants, and a short recess had to be declared.
167:
during the proceedings, Pearson argued that the Chungs had failed to fulfill the "Same Day Service" and "Satisfaction Guaranteed" promises posted outside their business. The Chungs argued that the signs could only be considered fraud if a
436:
hosted a fundraiser for the Chungs to help pay their attorneys fees that reported having raised up to $ 64,000. The Chungs say they have received close to $ 100,000 from supporters to cover their attorneys' fees and lost business.
336:, where oral argument was held on October 22, 2008, before a three-judge panel consisting of judges Phyllis Thompson, Noel Anketell Kramer and Michael W. Farrell. Manning represented the Chungs on the appeal
1702:
248:
On May 30, 2007, Pearson reduced his demands to $ 54 million in damages rather than $ 67 million. Among his requests were $ 500,000 in attorney's fees, $ 2 million for "discomfort, inconvenience, and
998:
396:, and dozens of bloggers to refer to it as "The Great American Pants Suit", and to Pearson as "Judge Fancy Pants". Pearson was named #4 in the list of the Overall Stella Awards Winners by the
2219:
2704:
296:
of Pearson's divorce proceedings, where he was sanctioned $ 12,000 by the trial court for "creating unnecessary litigation and threatening both his wife and her lawyer with disbarment".
2900:
1973:
2646:
212:
called Custom Cleaners to be altered. The establishment was owned collectively by Jin and Soo Chung, a married couple, and their son Ki Chung, all of whom had immigrated from
2352:
3413:
1538:
2477:
271:
163:
1475:
2424:
2852:
1120:
755:
404:
quoted Chris Manning, attorney for the Chung family, as saying that the experience for the Chungs has become the "American nightmare"—an ironic reference to the
2144:
1197:
3195:
2759:
2345:
2069:
154:
by the Chungs, which Pearson claimed the pants to be worth, but the Chungs refused. In response, Pearson filed suit against the Chungs for inconvenience and
2199:
1742:
2571:
1821:
604:
555:
249:
230:
222:
155:
127:
43:
2697:
284:
On June 25, 2007, the trial ended with District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruling in favor of the dry cleaners, and awarding them
2116:
1966:
1010:
2938:
1571:
3403:
2137:
2615:
2560:
2331:
333:
3393:
3309:
2297:
1959:
1151:
971:
2879:
1178:
2608:
2283:
2031:
1787:
1103:
352:, "Pearson has two remaining avenues of appeal left: He could ask the entire nine-judge appellate court to review the case, or ask the
3408:
2872:
1336:
1923:
1355:
2766:
1543:
865:
433:
3347:
3208:
3200:
2738:
2470:
1034:
824:
787:
425:
1552:
3398:
2484:
2304:
256:
on the part of the Chungs. The Chungs' lawyer, Christopher Manning, alleged that the signs could only be considered fraud if a
2731:
2431:
1899:
917:
3190:
2811:
2664:
1483:
356:
to weigh in." On January 6, 2009, Pearson filed a petition with the D.C. Court of Appeals, requesting the case be reheard
304:
Pearson made a motion on July 11, 2007, to reconsider in the trial court, stating that he felt the judge had "committed a
3164:
2931:
2238:
1675:
1437:
1305:
1276:
728:
376:
had continued his intransigent behavior even during the misconduct proceedings. Pearson retained his DC bar membership.
1128:
765:
701:
2802:
2505:
2085:
1412:
1222:
400:, after being the Stella Awards winner for the year 2007. The case has garnered considerable international attention.
1548:
1248:
1207:
1075:
860:
646:
2553:
2290:
1843:
1506:
455:
445:
429:
1817:
346:. On December 18, 2008, the panel that heard Pearson's appeal announced that they were rejecting it. According to
2773:
2456:
2417:
2038:
2893:
1754:
523:
421:
listed the case as "Exhibit 1" in its 2008 article "9 Insane Cases that Prove the US Legal System Is Screwed".
131:
1726:
1380:
2924:
2688:
2390:
386:
2956:
2822:
2594:
1982:
2985:
2210:
2130:
1581:
3367:
2831:
2724:
2370:
2109:
2100:
1891:
1462:
467:
184:
1855:
677:"54 million dollars lawsuit against South Korean dry cleaner over pair of trousers is in full swing"
3302:
3023:
2512:
2315:
1202:
1156:
976:
922:
888:
760:
733:
392:
348:
325:
the dry cleaners. Pearson lost his appeal when the D.C. Circuit ruled against him on May 27, 2010.
321:
233:
Judge Neal Kravitz stated that "the court has significant concerns that the plaintiff is acting in
676:
3330:
3234:
3169:
3003:
2745:
2546:
2383:
2374:
2164:
2123:
353:
158:, initially requesting $ 67 million in damages, though later reduced the amount to $ 54 million.
1778:"Trousers Judge Facing Disciplinary Action Nearly A Decade After 'Satisfaction Guaranteed' Suit"
149:
On May 3, 2005, Pearson delivered a pair of gray pants to a local dry cleaning establishment in
618:
2980:
2715:
2601:
2447:
2443:
2408:
2359:
2324:
2276:
2024:
2010:
1050:
257:
169:
568:
3316:
3074:
2863:
2845:
2838:
2679:
2580:
2491:
2463:
2397:
2338:
2269:
2182:
2171:
2155:
2096:
2078:
2058:
2049:
1945:
1777:
1679:
1567:
1534:
1182:
1100:
672:
409:
317:
238:
209:
150:
1879:
1333:
3265:
3154:
3095:
3033:
2975:
2780:
2539:
2530:
2519:
2498:
2017:
2001:
1730:
1340:
1107:
1038:
293:
242:
1647:
172:
could be misled by them. Pearson lost the case and subsequent appeal. The Chungs made a
3285:
3239:
3138:
3128:
3064:
2752:
2587:
2192:
1032:
Law.com - Ethics Complaint Filed Against Judge Over His $ 65M Suit Against Dry Cleaners
834:
797:
486:
450:
405:
289:
173:
1031:
838:
801:
269:
The trial heard opening arguments on June 12, 2007, with Pearson representing himself
176:
to recover their legal fees, but withdrew it following the conclusion of a successful
3387:
3372:
3054:
3049:
3013:
397:
3357:
3275:
3229:
3059:
3018:
3008:
2260:
1894: (United States District Court for the District of Columbia July 23, 2009).
1576:
573:
237:". The judge resolved some of the issues in the Chungs' favor in response to their
205:
135:
1927:
825:"Judge suing Washington, D.C., dry cleaner says merchant must honour all demands"
518:
3244:
3069:
3028:
1907:
417:
305:
285:
213:
188:
177:
1867:
3352:
3260:
3123:
3079:
2251:
2230:
945:
788:"US judge cuts demand in multimillion-dollar suit against cleaners over pants"
363:
1101:
WUSA9.com | Washington, DC | Judge Refuses To Reconsider Ruling In Pants Case
3105:
3100:
705:
490:
clothes that he delivered to Custom Cleaners were returned without incident.
234:
17:
972:"Judge Who Seeks Millions for Lost Pants Has His (Emotional) Day in Court"
2630:
1951:
1652:
1622:
893:
829:
792:
650:
415:
listed the case at #37 in its "101 Dumbest Moments in Business" of 2007.
401:
338:
183:
The case drew international attention and has been held as an example of
143:
3159:
3133:
2947:
1997:
1750:
357:
139:
123:
245:), but could not dismiss the case because some facts were in dispute.
3362:
3280:
3270:
2970:
1870: (Superior Court of the District of Columbia July 10, 2007).
1858: (Superior Court of the District of Columbia June 25, 2007).
1596:
519:"Judge Rules in Favor of Dry Cleaners in $ 54 Million Pants Lawsuit"
1882: (District of Columbia Court of Appeals December 18, 2008).
3224:
3174:
1723:
949:
320:
as well as his job back. On July 23, 2009, federal district judge
253:
1782:
517:
Avila, Jim; Francescani, Chris; Michels, Scott (June 25, 2007).
2920:
1955:
261:
divorce proceedings, and was collecting unemployment benefits.
1006:
623:
161:
The case went to trial on June 12, 2007. Representing himself
204:
On May 3, 2005, Pearson delivered a pair of gray pants to a
1846: (Superior Court of the District of Columbia 2007).
1356:"Former judge not giving up on $ 54 mil missing pants case"
1306:"Appeals Court Rejects Request for New Trial in Pants Case"
1051:"MEMORANDUM OPINION∗ BY CHIEF JUDGE JOHANNA L. FITZPATRICK"
999:"Administrative Law Judge Loses $ 54 Million Pants Lawsuit"
229:
4,600, and $ 12,000—all of which were rejected by Pearson.
78:
no. CA-4302-05 (Sup. Ct. D.C. June 25, 2007)
2916:
2220:
Redbox Automated Retail LLC v. Universal City Studios LLLP
1703:"9 Insane Cases that Prove the US Legal System Is Screwed"
2705:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.
729:"Wearing Down the Judicial System with a Pair of Pants"
2901:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell
332:
On September 10, 2008, Pearson filed an appeal to the
1743:"Dry Cleaner in Pants Suit Closes (Associated Press)"
1076:"Customer pursues $ 54M lawsuit against dry cleaners"
2647:
Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.
3340:
3294:
3253:
3217:
3183:
3147:
3116:
3088:
3042:
2996:
2963:
2862:
2821:
2801:
2794:
2714:
2687:
2678:
2656:
2638:
2629:
2570:
2529:
2441:
2407:
2369:
2353:
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
2314:
2259:
2250:
2229:
2209:
2181:
2154:
2095:
2068:
2048:
1996:
1989:
103:
98:
87:
82:
74:
59:
49:
39:
34:
1505:
1413:"$ 54M Missing Pants Judge Running Out Of Options"
946:"Countdown with Keith Olbermann: Pearson v. Chung"
444:The incident and lawsuit served as the basis for "
2478:Seong Sil Kim v. New York City Transit Authority
2425:Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Railroad Corp.
1328:
1326:
1249:""Pants Judge" Roy Pearson Strikes Out in Court"
292:which the Chungs later withdrew. The court took
2145:Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout
1381:"Another hearing sought in missing pants case"
861:"Judge's $ 54-million pant suit goes to court"
94:, no. 07-CV-872 (D.C. App. Dec. 18, 2008)
2932:
1967:
1299:
1297:
1277:"Judge Who Filed Suit Plans to Appeal Defeat"
1056:. COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. March 8, 2005
8:
3196:Laundry and Dry Cleaning International Union
2760:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson
2346:Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital
2070:intentional infliction of emotional distress
1880: Opinion of the Court, No. 07-CV-872
1856: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
1121:"First, Pants Man Loses Case. Next, His Job"
619:"The $ 54 million pants suit unravels again"
2853:American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Superior Court
2698:Alwin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
2200:Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
1868: Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration
569:"Court finds missing pants not worth $ 54M"
384:The unusual circumstances of this case led
2939:
2925:
2917:
2798:
2684:
2635:
2572:Negligent infliction of emotional distress
2256:
1993:
1974:
1960:
1952:
142:after the dry cleaners allegedly lost his
128:Superior Court of the District of Columbia
44:Superior Court of the District of Columbia
31:
3414:Legal history of the District of Columbia
2117:CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.
1344:, no. 07-CV-872 (D.C. App. Dec. 18, 2008)
1304:Alexander, Keith L. (December 18, 2008).
1270:
1268:
1266:
54:Roy L. Pearson, Jr. v. Soo Chung, et al.
1572:"Judge sides with cleaner in pants suit"
1179:"Judge loses more than pants in lawsuit"
1150:Alexander, Keith L. (October 23, 2007).
2138:United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt
1892: Memorandum Opinion, No. 08-758
1887:Pearson v. District of Columbia, et al.
1406:
1404:
1402:
506:
478:
1776:Sturdivant, Christina (June 9, 2016).
889:"Dry Cleaner Wins In $ 54M Pants Case"
2616:Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
2561:Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.
2332:Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford
1623:"The 2007 True Stella Awards Winners"
1463:DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
1221:Wilber, Del Quentin (July 29, 2009).
512:
510:
334:District of Columbia Court of Appeals
223:District of Columbia's Superior Court
29:2007 lawsuit about dry-cleaning pants
7:
3310:Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States
2298:Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
1753:. September 19, 2007. Archived from
1152:"Judge Set to Lose Job, Sources Say"
594:
592:
545:
543:
541:
2609:Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.
2284:Jablonski by Pahls v. United States
2032:Picard v. Barry Pontiac-Buick, Inc.
1790:from the original on April 19, 2023
1648:"US man loses $ 54m trousers claim"
1539:"'Fancy pants' loses wacky lawsuit"
1387:. Associated Press. January 6, 2009
1275:Henri E. Cauvin (August 15, 2007).
756:"Pants Extra: Inside the Courtroom"
617:Courson, Paul (December 19, 2008).
2873:BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
649:. Manning Sossamon. Archived from
603:, 05 CA 4302, 11 (
554:, 05 CA 4302, 10 (
367:, bringing the dispute to an end.
342:, and Pearson represented himself
138:establishment for $ 54 million in
25:
2880:Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
2767:Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.
1942:Office of Administrative Hearings
1676:"101 Dumbest Moments in Business"
1354:O'Brien, John (January 6, 2009).
944:Stewart, Alison (June 12, 2007).
897:. Associated Press. June 25, 2007
866:Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
434:United States Chamber of Commerce
241:(which was filed at the close of
3348:Baths and wash houses in Britain
3209:Worshipful Company of Launderers
3201:Laundry Workers Industrial Union
2739:Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.
2471:United States v. GlaxoSmithKline
1946:Internet Archive Wayback Machine
823:Takruri, Lubna (June 13, 2007).
426:American Tort Reform Association
189:tort reform in the United States
2485:United States v. Johnson (1987)
2305:Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court
1924:"Roy L. Pearson, Jr. Biography"
1701:Luke McKinney (June 12, 2008).
1597:"Overall Stella Awards Winners"
1247:Koppel, Nathan (May 27, 2010).
1223:"Ex-Judge's Lawsuit Thrown Out"
1119:Fisher, Marc (August 2, 2007).
916:Steiner, Emil (June 15, 2007).
764:. June 14, 2007. Archived from
647:"The Facts of Pearson V. Chung"
3404:2007 in United States case law
2732:Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories
2432:Vance v. Ball State University
1844: Joint Pre-trial Statement
1474:Rob Anderson (June 26, 2007).
1251:. Wall Street Journal Law Blog
1198:"Roy Pearson's Latest Lawsuit"
970:Fisher, Marc (June 13, 2007).
800:. June 6, 2007. Archived from
727:Fisher, Marc (June 14, 2007).
702:"Custom Cleaners Defense Fund"
130:in which Roy Pearson, then an
1:
3191:Chinese Hand Laundry Alliance
2812:Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood
2665:Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.
300:Post-trial motions and appeal
2239:United States defamation law
1549:Independent News & Media
1411:Urda, Anne (March 3, 2009).
1196:Emil Steiner (May 6, 2008).
3394:United States tort case law
2803:Joint and several liability
2506:Yount v. City of Sacramento
2086:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
1106:September 27, 2007, at the
1037:September 30, 2007, at the
239:motion for summary judgment
3430:
2554:Ultramares Corp. v. Touche
2291:Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.
430:Institute for Legal Reform
3409:Abuse of the legal system
2954:
2774:Chysky v. Drake Bros. Co.
2457:Boub v. Township of Wayne
2418:Albro v. Agawam Canal Co.
2039:Sheridan v. United States
1339:January 16, 2014, at the
2894:Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg
1898:Manning & Sossamon.
1875:Pearson v. Chung, et al.
1751:WPVI-TV Philadelphia, PA
1438:"Pants Hearing Rejected"
132:administrative law judge
92:Pearson v. Chung, et al.
2689:Ultrahazardous activity
2391:Hitaffer v. Argonne Co.
1512:The Wall Street Journal
1334:Pearson v. Chung, et al
1082:. CBC.CA. July 12, 2007
458:, which aired in 2008.
387:The Wall Street Journal
306:fundamental legal error
63:June 25, 2007
3399:Clothing controversies
2957:List of laundry topics
2823:Comparative negligence
2595:Archibald v. Braverman
1983:United States tort law
645:Manning, Christopher.
424:On July 24, 2007, the
2211:Tortious interference
2131:Intel Corp. v. Hamidi
1729:July 5, 2007, at the
1705:. Cracked.com website
1584:on November 18, 2007.
118:, also known as the "
3368:Self-service laundry
3205:Project Laundry List
2832:Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
2725:Thomas v. Winchester
2110:Rowland v. Christian
2101:Trespass to chattels
1948:, as of May 2, 2007.
1747:Action News 6abc.com
1544:IOL News (iol.co.za)
1507:"$ 67 million pants"
1476:"Today's Hot Topics"
1185:. November 14, 2007.
468:Vexatious litigation
185:frivolous litigation
3303:Barbier v. Connolly
2513:Pearson v. Callahan
2316:Medical malpractice
1757:on October 10, 2012
1682:. December 19, 2007
1570:) (June 26, 2007).
1537:) (June 27, 2007).
1480:The Washington Post
1442:The Washington Post
1310:The Washington Post
1281:The Washington Post
1227:The Washington Post
1203:The Washington Post
1157:The Washington Post
1125:The Washington Post
977:The Washington Post
923:The Washington Post
761:The Washington Post
734:The Washington Post
485:Pearson owned five
393:The Washington Post
371:Disciplinary action
349:The Washington Post
322:Ellen Segal Huvelle
231:D.C. Superior Court
3331:Yick Wo v. Hopkins
3235:Industrial laundry
3004:Combo washer dryer
2746:Loop v. Litchfield
2547:Ybarra v. Spangard
2442:Public Authority,
2384:Cahoon v. Cummings
2375:Loss of consortium
2185:, Publicity rights
2165:Haslem v. Lockwood
2124:Dougherty v. Stepp
1818:05 CA 4302
1724:Support the Chungs
1627:True Stella Awards
1621:Randy Cassingham.
1601:True Stella Awards
1595:Randy Cassingham.
398:True Stella Awards
354:U.S. Supreme Court
217:order, agreed to.
122:" case, is a 2007
120:$ 54 million pants
88:Subsequent actions
3381:
3380:
2981:Laundry detergent
2914:
2913:
2910:
2909:
2790:
2789:
2716:Product liability
2674:
2673:
2625:
2624:
2602:Thing v. La Chusa
2448:Negligence per se
2409:Common employment
2360:Scott v. Bradford
2325:Landeros v. Flood
2277:Trimarco v. Klein
2246:
2245:
2025:Vosburg v. Putney
2011:Garratt v. Dailey
1990:Intentional Torts
1555:on June 28, 2007.
675:(June 21, 2007).
448:", an episode of
258:reasonable person
208:establishment in
187:and the need for
170:reasonable person
134:, sued his local
111:
110:
16:(Redirected from
3421:
3324:Pearson v. Chung
3317:Muller v. Oregon
2941:
2934:
2927:
2918:
2887:Pearson v. Chung
2864:Punitive damages
2846:Hoffman v. Jones
2839:Knight v. Jewett
2799:
2685:
2680:Strict liability
2636:
2581:Krouse v. Graham
2492:Martin v. Herzog
2464:Briscoe v. LaHue
2398:Werling v. Sandy
2339:Mohr v. Williams
2270:Brown v. Kendall
2257:
2172:Popov v. Hayashi
2097:Trespass to land
2079:Snyder v. Phelps
2059:Hartman v. Moore
2050:Abuse of process
1994:
1976:
1969:
1962:
1953:
1939:
1937:
1935:
1926:. Archived from
1919:
1917:
1915:
1906:. Archived from
1902:Pearson v. Chung
1889:
1877:
1865:
1863:Pearson v. Chung
1853:
1851:Pearson v. Chung
1841:
1839:Pearson v. Chung
1815:
1813:Pearson v. Chung
1800:
1799:
1797:
1795:
1773:
1767:
1766:
1764:
1762:
1739:
1733:
1721:
1715:
1714:
1712:
1710:
1698:
1692:
1691:
1689:
1687:
1672:
1666:
1665:
1663:
1661:
1644:
1638:
1637:
1635:
1633:
1618:
1612:
1611:
1609:
1607:
1592:
1586:
1585:
1580:. Archived from
1568:Associated Press
1563:
1557:
1556:
1551:. Archived from
1535:Associated Press
1530:
1524:
1523:
1521:
1519:
1509:
1502:
1496:
1495:
1493:
1491:
1482:. Archived from
1471:
1465:
1460:
1454:
1453:
1451:
1449:
1434:
1428:
1427:
1425:
1423:
1408:
1397:
1396:
1394:
1392:
1377:
1371:
1370:
1368:
1366:
1351:
1345:
1330:
1321:
1320:
1318:
1316:
1301:
1292:
1291:
1289:
1287:
1272:
1261:
1260:
1258:
1256:
1244:
1238:
1237:
1235:
1233:
1218:
1212:
1211:
1210:on July 6, 2008.
1206:. Archived from
1193:
1187:
1186:
1183:Associated Press
1175:
1169:
1168:
1166:
1164:
1147:
1141:
1140:
1138:
1136:
1127:. Archived from
1116:
1110:
1098:
1092:
1091:
1089:
1087:
1072:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1061:
1055:
1047:
1041:
1029:
1023:
1022:
1020:
1018:
1013:on June 29, 2007
1009:. Archived from
995:
989:
988:
986:
984:
967:
961:
960:
958:
956:
941:
935:
934:
932:
930:
913:
907:
906:
904:
902:
885:
879:
878:
876:
874:
857:
851:
850:
848:
846:
841:on July 17, 2007
837:. Archived from
820:
814:
813:
811:
809:
804:on July 11, 2007
784:
778:
777:
775:
773:
752:
746:
745:
743:
741:
724:
718:
717:
715:
713:
704:. Archived from
698:
692:
691:
689:
687:
673:Associated Press
669:
663:
662:
660:
658:
642:
636:
635:
633:
631:
614:
608:
602:
600:Pearson v. Chung
596:
587:
586:
584:
582:
565:
559:
553:
551:Pearson v. Chung
547:
536:
535:
533:
531:
514:
491:
483:
318:punitive damages
210:Washington, D.C.
151:Washington, D.C.
115:Pearson v. Chung
99:Court membership
70:
68:
35:Pearson v. Chung
32:
21:
3429:
3428:
3424:
3423:
3422:
3420:
3419:
3418:
3384:
3383:
3382:
3377:
3336:
3290:
3266:Dispensing ball
3249:
3213:
3179:
3155:Colour fastness
3143:
3112:
3084:
3038:
3034:Washing machine
2992:
2976:Fabric softener
2959:
2950:
2945:
2915:
2906:
2858:
2817:
2786:
2781:Devlin v. Smith
2710:
2670:
2652:
2621:
2566:
2540:Summers v. Tice
2525:
2520:Saucier v. Katz
2499:Tedla v. Ellman
2437:
2403:
2365:
2310:
2242:
2225:
2205:
2177:
2150:
2091:
2064:
2044:
2018:Katko v. Briney
1985:
1980:
1933:
1931:
1922:
1913:
1911:
1910:on May 13, 2008
1897:
1885:
1873:
1861:
1849:
1837:
1834:
1828:
1811:
1803:
1793:
1791:
1775:
1774:
1770:
1760:
1758:
1741:
1740:
1736:
1731:Wayback Machine
1722:
1718:
1708:
1706:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1685:
1683:
1674:
1673:
1669:
1659:
1657:
1656:. June 25, 2007
1646:
1645:
1641:
1631:
1629:
1620:
1619:
1615:
1605:
1603:
1594:
1593:
1589:
1566:Lubna Takruri (
1565:
1564:
1560:
1533:Lubna Takruri (
1532:
1531:
1527:
1517:
1515:
1514:. June 26, 2007
1504:
1503:
1499:
1489:
1487:
1486:on May 23, 2011
1473:
1472:
1468:
1461:
1457:
1447:
1445:
1444:. March 3, 2009
1436:
1435:
1431:
1421:
1419:
1410:
1409:
1400:
1390:
1388:
1379:
1378:
1374:
1364:
1362:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1341:Wayback Machine
1331:
1324:
1314:
1312:
1303:
1302:
1295:
1285:
1283:
1274:
1273:
1264:
1254:
1252:
1246:
1245:
1241:
1231:
1229:
1220:
1219:
1215:
1195:
1194:
1190:
1177:
1176:
1172:
1162:
1160:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1134:
1132:
1131:on May 23, 2011
1118:
1117:
1113:
1108:Wayback Machine
1099:
1095:
1085:
1083:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1059:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1044:
1039:Wayback Machine
1030:
1026:
1016:
1014:
997:
996:
992:
982:
980:
969:
968:
964:
954:
952:
943:
942:
938:
928:
926:
918:"Pants Lawsuit"
915:
914:
910:
900:
898:
887:
886:
882:
872:
870:
869:. June 12, 2007
859:
858:
854:
844:
842:
822:
821:
817:
807:
805:
786:
785:
781:
771:
769:
768:on May 11, 2008
754:
753:
749:
739:
737:
726:
725:
721:
711:
709:
708:on June 5, 2007
700:
699:
695:
685:
683:
671:
670:
666:
656:
654:
653:on May 15, 2009
644:
643:
639:
629:
627:
616:
615:
611:
598:
597:
590:
580:
578:
577:. June 25, 2007
567:
566:
562:
549:
548:
539:
529:
527:
516:
515:
508:
499:
494:
484:
480:
476:
464:
451:Law & Order
382:
380:Cultural impact
373:
302:
294:judicial notice
282:
267:
250:mental distress
202:
197:
156:mental distress
126:decided in the
107:Judith Bartnoff
66:
64:
30:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3427:
3425:
3417:
3416:
3411:
3406:
3401:
3396:
3386:
3385:
3379:
3378:
3376:
3375:
3370:
3365:
3360:
3355:
3350:
3344:
3342:
3338:
3337:
3335:
3334:
3327:
3320:
3313:
3306:
3298:
3296:
3292:
3291:
3289:
3288:
3286:Washing paddle
3283:
3278:
3273:
3268:
3263:
3257:
3255:
3251:
3250:
3248:
3247:
3242:
3240:Laundry symbol
3237:
3232:
3227:
3221:
3219:
3215:
3214:
3212:
3211:
3206:
3203:
3198:
3193:
3187:
3185:
3181:
3180:
3178:
3177:
3172:
3167:
3162:
3157:
3151:
3149:
3145:
3144:
3142:
3141:
3139:Laundry starch
3136:
3131:
3129:Clothes hanger
3126:
3120:
3118:
3114:
3113:
3111:
3110:
3109:
3108:
3103:
3096:Clothes folder
3092:
3090:
3086:
3085:
3083:
3082:
3077:
3072:
3067:
3065:Drying cabinet
3062:
3057:
3052:
3046:
3044:
3040:
3039:
3037:
3036:
3031:
3026:
3021:
3016:
3011:
3006:
3000:
2998:
2994:
2993:
2991:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2978:
2973:
2967:
2965:
2961:
2960:
2955:
2952:
2951:
2946:
2944:
2943:
2936:
2929:
2921:
2912:
2911:
2908:
2907:
2905:
2904:
2897:
2890:
2883:
2876:
2868:
2866:
2860:
2859:
2857:
2856:
2849:
2842:
2835:
2827:
2825:
2819:
2818:
2816:
2815:
2807:
2805:
2796:
2792:
2791:
2788:
2787:
2785:
2784:
2777:
2770:
2763:
2756:
2753:Losee v. Clute
2749:
2742:
2735:
2728:
2720:
2718:
2712:
2711:
2709:
2708:
2701:
2693:
2691:
2682:
2676:
2675:
2672:
2671:
2669:
2668:
2660:
2658:
2654:
2653:
2651:
2650:
2642:
2640:
2633:
2627:
2626:
2623:
2622:
2620:
2619:
2612:
2605:
2598:
2591:
2588:Dillon v. Legg
2584:
2576:
2574:
2568:
2567:
2565:
2564:
2557:
2550:
2543:
2535:
2533:
2527:
2526:
2524:
2523:
2516:
2509:
2502:
2495:
2488:
2481:
2474:
2467:
2460:
2452:
2450:
2444:Fireman's rule
2439:
2438:
2436:
2435:
2428:
2421:
2413:
2411:
2405:
2404:
2402:
2401:
2394:
2387:
2379:
2377:
2371:Wrongful death
2367:
2366:
2364:
2363:
2356:
2349:
2342:
2335:
2328:
2320:
2318:
2312:
2311:
2309:
2308:
2301:
2294:
2287:
2280:
2273:
2265:
2263:
2254:
2248:
2247:
2244:
2243:
2235:
2233:
2227:
2226:
2224:
2223:
2215:
2213:
2207:
2206:
2204:
2203:
2196:
2193:Taus v. Loftus
2188:
2186:
2179:
2178:
2176:
2175:
2168:
2160:
2158:
2152:
2151:
2149:
2148:
2141:
2134:
2127:
2120:
2113:
2105:
2103:
2093:
2092:
2090:
2089:
2082:
2074:
2072:
2066:
2065:
2063:
2062:
2054:
2052:
2046:
2045:
2043:
2042:
2035:
2028:
2021:
2014:
2006:
2004:
1991:
1987:
1986:
1981:
1979:
1978:
1971:
1964:
1956:
1950:
1949:
1930:on May 2, 2007
1920:
1900:"The Facts of
1895:
1883:
1871:
1859:
1847:
1833:
1832:External links
1830:
1826:
1825:
1808:
1807:
1802:
1801:
1768:
1734:
1716:
1693:
1667:
1639:
1613:
1587:
1558:
1525:
1497:
1466:
1455:
1429:
1398:
1372:
1360:Legal NewsLine
1346:
1322:
1293:
1262:
1239:
1213:
1188:
1170:
1142:
1111:
1093:
1067:
1042:
1024:
990:
962:
936:
908:
880:
852:
835:Canadian Press
815:
798:Canadian Press
779:
747:
719:
693:
664:
637:
609:
588:
560:
537:
505:
504:
503:
498:
495:
493:
492:
487:Hickey Freeman
477:
475:
472:
471:
470:
463:
460:
406:American Dream
381:
378:
372:
369:
301:
298:
288:pursuant to a
281:
278:
266:
263:
201:
198:
196:
193:
109:
108:
105:
101:
100:
96:
95:
89:
85:
84:
80:
79:
76:
72:
71:
61:
57:
56:
51:
50:Full case name
47:
46:
41:
37:
36:
28:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3426:
3415:
3412:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3400:
3397:
3395:
3392:
3391:
3389:
3374:
3371:
3369:
3366:
3364:
3361:
3359:
3356:
3354:
3351:
3349:
3346:
3345:
3343:
3339:
3333:
3332:
3328:
3326:
3325:
3321:
3319:
3318:
3314:
3312:
3311:
3307:
3305:
3304:
3300:
3299:
3297:
3293:
3287:
3284:
3282:
3279:
3277:
3274:
3272:
3269:
3267:
3264:
3262:
3259:
3258:
3256:
3252:
3246:
3243:
3241:
3238:
3236:
3233:
3231:
3228:
3226:
3223:
3222:
3220:
3216:
3210:
3207:
3204:
3202:
3199:
3197:
3194:
3192:
3189:
3188:
3186:
3184:Organizations
3182:
3176:
3173:
3171:
3168:
3166:
3163:
3161:
3158:
3156:
3153:
3152:
3150:
3146:
3140:
3137:
3135:
3132:
3130:
3127:
3125:
3122:
3121:
3119:
3115:
3107:
3104:
3102:
3099:
3098:
3097:
3094:
3093:
3091:
3087:
3081:
3078:
3076:
3073:
3071:
3068:
3066:
3063:
3061:
3058:
3056:
3055:Clothes horse
3053:
3051:
3050:Clothes dryer
3048:
3047:
3045:
3041:
3035:
3032:
3030:
3027:
3025:
3022:
3020:
3017:
3015:
3014:Tunnel washer
3012:
3010:
3007:
3005:
3002:
3001:
2999:
2995:
2987:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2968:
2966:
2962:
2958:
2953:
2949:
2942:
2937:
2935:
2930:
2928:
2923:
2922:
2919:
2903:
2902:
2898:
2896:
2895:
2891:
2889:
2888:
2884:
2882:
2881:
2877:
2875:
2874:
2870:
2869:
2867:
2865:
2861:
2855:
2854:
2850:
2848:
2847:
2843:
2841:
2840:
2836:
2834:
2833:
2829:
2828:
2826:
2824:
2820:
2814:
2813:
2809:
2808:
2806:
2804:
2800:
2797:
2793:
2783:
2782:
2778:
2776:
2775:
2771:
2769:
2768:
2764:
2762:
2761:
2757:
2755:
2754:
2750:
2748:
2747:
2743:
2741:
2740:
2736:
2734:
2733:
2729:
2727:
2726:
2722:
2721:
2719:
2717:
2713:
2707:
2706:
2702:
2700:
2699:
2695:
2694:
2692:
2690:
2686:
2683:
2681:
2677:
2667:
2666:
2662:
2661:
2659:
2655:
2649:
2648:
2644:
2643:
2641:
2637:
2634:
2632:
2628:
2618:
2617:
2613:
2611:
2610:
2606:
2604:
2603:
2599:
2597:
2596:
2592:
2590:
2589:
2585:
2583:
2582:
2578:
2577:
2575:
2573:
2569:
2563:
2562:
2558:
2556:
2555:
2551:
2549:
2548:
2544:
2542:
2541:
2537:
2536:
2534:
2532:
2528:
2522:
2521:
2517:
2515:
2514:
2510:
2508:
2507:
2503:
2501:
2500:
2496:
2494:
2493:
2489:
2487:
2486:
2482:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2473:
2472:
2468:
2466:
2465:
2461:
2459:
2458:
2454:
2453:
2451:
2449:
2445:
2440:
2434:
2433:
2429:
2427:
2426:
2422:
2420:
2419:
2415:
2414:
2412:
2410:
2406:
2400:
2399:
2395:
2393:
2392:
2388:
2386:
2385:
2381:
2380:
2378:
2376:
2372:
2368:
2362:
2361:
2357:
2355:
2354:
2350:
2348:
2347:
2343:
2341:
2340:
2336:
2334:
2333:
2329:
2327:
2326:
2322:
2321:
2319:
2317:
2313:
2307:
2306:
2302:
2300:
2299:
2295:
2293:
2292:
2288:
2286:
2285:
2281:
2279:
2278:
2274:
2272:
2271:
2267:
2266:
2264:
2262:
2258:
2255:
2253:
2249:
2241:
2240:
2234:
2232:
2228:
2222:
2221:
2217:
2216:
2214:
2212:
2208:
2202:
2201:
2197:
2195:
2194:
2190:
2189:
2187:
2184:
2180:
2174:
2173:
2169:
2167:
2166:
2162:
2161:
2159:
2157:
2153:
2147:
2146:
2142:
2140:
2139:
2135:
2133:
2132:
2128:
2126:
2125:
2121:
2119:
2118:
2114:
2112:
2111:
2107:
2106:
2104:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2088:
2087:
2083:
2081:
2080:
2076:
2075:
2073:
2071:
2067:
2061:
2060:
2056:
2055:
2053:
2051:
2047:
2041:
2040:
2036:
2034:
2033:
2029:
2027:
2026:
2022:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2013:
2012:
2008:
2007:
2005:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1977:
1972:
1970:
1965:
1963:
1958:
1957:
1954:
1947:
1943:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1909:
1905:
1903:
1896:
1893:
1888:
1884:
1881:
1876:
1872:
1869:
1864:
1860:
1857:
1852:
1848:
1845:
1840:
1836:
1835:
1831:
1829:
1823:
1822:D.C. Sup. Ct.
1819:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1804:
1789:
1785:
1784:
1779:
1772:
1769:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1738:
1735:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1720:
1717:
1704:
1697:
1694:
1681:
1677:
1671:
1668:
1655:
1654:
1649:
1643:
1640:
1628:
1624:
1617:
1614:
1602:
1598:
1591:
1588:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1573:
1569:
1562:
1559:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1545:
1540:
1536:
1529:
1526:
1513:
1508:
1501:
1498:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1470:
1467:
1464:
1459:
1456:
1443:
1439:
1433:
1430:
1418:
1414:
1407:
1405:
1403:
1399:
1386:
1382:
1376:
1373:
1361:
1357:
1350:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1338:
1335:
1329:
1327:
1323:
1311:
1307:
1300:
1298:
1294:
1282:
1278:
1271:
1269:
1267:
1263:
1250:
1243:
1240:
1228:
1224:
1217:
1214:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1199:
1192:
1189:
1184:
1180:
1174:
1171:
1159:
1158:
1153:
1146:
1143:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1115:
1112:
1109:
1105:
1102:
1097:
1094:
1081:
1077:
1071:
1068:
1052:
1046:
1043:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1028:
1025:
1012:
1008:
1004:
1000:
994:
991:
979:
978:
973:
966:
963:
951:
947:
940:
937:
925:
924:
919:
912:
909:
896:
895:
890:
884:
881:
868:
867:
862:
856:
853:
840:
836:
832:
831:
826:
819:
816:
803:
799:
795:
794:
789:
783:
780:
767:
763:
762:
757:
751:
748:
736:
735:
730:
723:
720:
707:
703:
697:
694:
682:
678:
674:
668:
665:
652:
648:
641:
638:
626:
625:
620:
613:
610:
606:
605:D.C. Sup. Ct.
601:
595:
593:
589:
576:
575:
570:
564:
561:
557:
556:D.C. Sup. Ct.
552:
546:
544:
542:
538:
526:
525:
520:
513:
511:
507:
501:
500:
496:
488:
482:
479:
473:
469:
466:
465:
461:
459:
457:
453:
452:
447:
442:
438:
435:
431:
427:
422:
420:
419:
414:
412:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
389:
388:
379:
377:
370:
368:
366:
365:
359:
355:
351:
350:
345:
341:
340:
335:
330:
326:
323:
319:
313:
309:
307:
299:
297:
295:
291:
287:
279:
277:
274:
273:
264:
262:
259:
255:
251:
246:
244:
240:
236:
232:
226:
224:
218:
215:
211:
207:
199:
194:
192:
190:
186:
181:
179:
175:
171:
166:
165:
159:
157:
152:
147:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
106:
104:Judge sitting
102:
97:
93:
90:
86:
81:
77:
73:
62:
58:
55:
52:
48:
45:
42:
38:
33:
27:
19:
3358:Laundry room
3329:
3323:
3322:
3315:
3308:
3301:
3276:Laundry ball
3230:Housekeeping
3060:Clothes line
3019:Wet cleaning
3009:Dry cleaning
2899:
2892:
2886:
2885:
2878:
2871:
2851:
2844:
2837:
2830:
2810:
2779:
2772:
2765:
2758:
2751:
2744:
2737:
2730:
2723:
2703:
2696:
2663:
2645:
2614:
2607:
2600:
2593:
2586:
2579:
2559:
2552:
2545:
2538:
2518:
2511:
2504:
2497:
2490:
2483:
2476:
2469:
2462:
2455:
2430:
2423:
2416:
2396:
2389:
2382:
2358:
2351:
2344:
2337:
2330:
2323:
2303:
2296:
2289:
2282:
2275:
2268:
2261:Duty of care
2236:
2218:
2198:
2191:
2170:
2163:
2143:
2136:
2129:
2122:
2115:
2108:
2084:
2077:
2057:
2037:
2030:
2023:
2016:
2009:
1941:
1932:. Retrieved
1928:the original
1912:. Retrieved
1908:the original
1901:
1886:
1874:
1862:
1850:
1838:
1827:
1812:
1792:. Retrieved
1781:
1771:
1759:. Retrieved
1755:the original
1746:
1737:
1719:
1707:. Retrieved
1696:
1684:. Retrieved
1670:
1658:. Retrieved
1651:
1642:
1630:. Retrieved
1626:
1616:
1604:. Retrieved
1600:
1590:
1582:the original
1577:Deseret News
1575:
1561:
1553:the original
1542:
1528:
1516:. Retrieved
1511:
1500:
1488:. Retrieved
1484:the original
1479:
1469:
1458:
1446:. Retrieved
1441:
1432:
1420:. Retrieved
1416:
1389:. Retrieved
1384:
1375:
1363:. Retrieved
1359:
1349:
1332:
1313:. Retrieved
1309:
1284:. Retrieved
1280:
1253:. Retrieved
1242:
1230:. Retrieved
1226:
1216:
1208:the original
1201:
1191:
1173:
1161:. Retrieved
1155:
1145:
1133:. Retrieved
1129:the original
1124:
1114:
1096:
1084:. Retrieved
1079:
1070:
1058:. Retrieved
1045:
1027:
1015:. Retrieved
1011:the original
1002:
993:
981:. Retrieved
975:
965:
953:. Retrieved
939:
927:. Retrieved
921:
911:
899:. Retrieved
892:
883:
871:. Retrieved
864:
855:
843:. Retrieved
839:the original
828:
818:
806:. Retrieved
802:the original
791:
782:
770:. Retrieved
766:the original
759:
750:
738:. Retrieved
732:
722:
710:. Retrieved
706:the original
696:
684:. Retrieved
680:
667:
655:. Retrieved
651:the original
640:
628:. Retrieved
622:
612:
599:
579:. Retrieved
572:
563:
550:
528:. Retrieved
522:
481:
449:
443:
439:
423:
416:
410:
391:
385:
383:
374:
362:
347:
343:
337:
331:
327:
314:
310:
303:
283:
270:
268:
247:
227:
219:
206:dry cleaning
203:
182:
162:
160:
148:
136:dry cleaning
119:
114:
113:
112:
91:
83:Case history
53:
26:
3254:Accessories
3245:Washerwoman
3070:Hills Hoist
3029:Wash copper
1824: 2007).
607: 2007).
558: 2007).
456:18th season
418:Cracked.com
286:court costs
214:South Korea
178:fundraising
18:Roy Pearson
3388:Categories
3373:Tvättstuga
3353:Dhobi Ghat
3261:Clothespin
3124:Box mangle
3080:Dryer ball
2252:Negligence
2231:Defamation
2156:Conversion
1944:, via the
1422:August 30,
1391:August 30,
1365:August 30,
1315:August 30,
502:References
497:References
446:Bottomless
364:certiorari
200:Background
180:campaign.
124:civil case
67:2007-06-25
3170:Shrinkage
3117:Finishing
3106:Laundroid
3101:FoldiMate
3024:Washboard
2964:Chemicals
2531:Causation
1940:From the
1794:April 19,
1632:March 12,
1606:March 12,
1385:USA Today
1135:August 3,
901:April 19,
873:April 19,
681:pravda.ru
657:April 16,
630:April 19,
581:April 19,
574:CNN Money
530:April 19,
474:Footnotes
243:discovery
235:bad faith
3148:Concepts
2631:Nuisance
1914:July 20,
1788:Archived
1761:June 25,
1727:Archived
1709:June 30,
1686:June 30,
1660:June 30,
1653:BBC News
1518:June 25,
1490:June 25,
1448:June 30,
1337:Archived
1286:June 30,
1255:June 30,
1232:June 30,
1163:June 30,
1104:Archived
1086:June 30,
1080:CBC News
1060:June 30,
1035:Archived
1017:June 25,
983:June 30,
929:June 30,
894:CBS News
845:June 14,
830:CBC News
793:CBC News
772:June 14,
740:June 30,
686:June 30,
524:ABC News
462:See also
428:and the
413:magazine
402:BBC News
339:pro bono
329:appeal.
280:Decision
75:Citation
3218:Culture
3165:Posting
3160:Fulling
3134:Ironing
3089:Folding
2997:Washing
2948:Laundry
2795:Damages
2657:Private
2183:Privacy
2002:Battery
1998:Assault
1806:Sources
1680:Fortune
955:May 12,
808:June 6,
712:June 6,
432:of the
411:Fortune
358:en banc
195:Lawsuit
140:damages
65: (
60:Decided
3363:Lavoir
3341:Places
3281:Posser
3271:Hamper
3075:Mangle
3043:Drying
2971:Bleach
2639:Public
2099:&
2000:&
1934:May 2,
1890:,
1878:,
1866:,
1854:,
1842:,
1820: (
1816:,
1417:Law360
344:pro se
290:motion
272:pro se
174:motion
164:pro se
3225:Dhobi
3175:Stain
1783:DCist
1054:(PDF)
950:MSNBC
265:Trial
254:fraud
144:pants
40:Court
2986:pods
2237:See
1936:2007
1916:2007
1796:2023
1763:2011
1711:2016
1688:2016
1662:2016
1634:2021
1608:2021
1520:2011
1492:2011
1450:2016
1424:2016
1393:2016
1367:2016
1317:2016
1288:2016
1257:2016
1234:2016
1165:2016
1137:2007
1088:2016
1062:2016
1019:2007
1003:NBC4
985:2016
957:2023
931:2016
903:2023
875:2023
847:2007
810:2007
774:2007
742:2016
714:2007
688:2016
659:2009
632:2023
583:2023
532:2023
3295:Law
1007:NBC
624:CNN
454:'s
3390::
2446:,
2373:,
1786:.
1780:.
1749:.
1745:.
1678:.
1650:.
1625:.
1599:.
1574:.
1547:.
1541:.
1510:.
1478:.
1440:.
1415:.
1401:^
1383:.
1358:.
1325:^
1308:.
1296:^
1279:.
1265:^
1225:.
1200:.
1181:.
1154:.
1123:.
1078:.
1005:.
1001:.
974:.
948:.
920:.
891:.
863:.
833:.
827:.
796:.
790:.
758:.
731:.
679:.
621:.
591:^
571:.
540:^
521:.
509:^
408:.
390:,
191:.
146:.
2940:e
2933:t
2926:v
1975:e
1968:t
1961:v
1938:.
1918:.
1904:"
1798:.
1765:.
1713:.
1690:.
1664:.
1636:.
1610:.
1522:.
1494:.
1452:.
1426:.
1395:.
1369:.
1319:.
1290:.
1259:.
1236:.
1167:.
1139:.
1090:.
1064:.
1021:.
987:.
959:.
933:.
905:.
877:.
849:.
812:.
776:.
744:.
716:.
690:.
661:.
634:.
585:.
534:.
69:)
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.