Knowledge (XXG)

Stability–instability paradox

Source 📝

768:"posits that both parties to a conflict will rationally view strategic conflict and the attendant risk of a strategic nuclear exchange as untenable, and will thus avoid any escalation of sub-strategic conflicts to the strategic level. This effective “cap” on sub-strategic militarized conflict escalation emboldens states to engage in such conflict with the confidence that it would not spiral out of control and threaten their strategic interests. The causal force of this theory of increased sub-strategic conflict is the mutual recognition of the untenability of conflict at the level of strategic interests—a product of MAD . With strategic interests forming the “red line” neither side would dare to cross, both sides are free to pursue sub-strategic political objectives through militarized conflict without the fear that the terms of such conflict will escalate beyond their control and jeopardize their strategic interests. Effectively, with the risk of uncontrolled escalation removed, the net costs to engage in conflict are reduced." 39: 688:. It states that when two countries each have nuclear weapons, the probability of a direct war between them greatly decreases, but the probability of minor or indirect conflicts between them increases. This occurs because rational actors want to avoid nuclear wars, and thus they neither start major conflicts nor allow minor conflicts to escalate into major conflicts—thus making it safe to engage in minor conflicts. For instance, during the 989: 745:, and prevent large scale wars, they simultaneously allow for more lower intensity conflicts. When one state has nuclear weapons, but their opponent does not, there is a greater chance of war. In contrast, when there is mutual nuclear weapon ownership with both states possessing nuclear weapons, the odds of war drop precipitously. 741:
in 2009 quantitatively evaluated the nuclear peace hypothesis, and found support for the existence of the stability–instability paradox. The study determined that while nuclear weapons promote
900: 659: 171: 177: 238: 227: 248: 652: 279: 222: 1049: 571: 192: 182: 883: 208: 197: 187: 907: 645: 112: 243: 161: 1030: 966:
Christopher J. Watterson 2017, 'Competing interpretations of the stability–instability paradox: the case of the Kargil War',
737: 677: 536: 272: 90: 749: 685: 253: 603: 510: 213: 58: 753: 717: 598: 556: 360: 353: 265: 78: 1059: 445: 375: 107: 73: 1023: 725: 721: 520: 147: 132: 68: 581: 586: 95: 83: 742: 515: 414: 391: 295: 137: 1054: 949: 854: 783: 633: 551: 546: 331: 932:
Rauchhaus, Robert (2009). "Evaluating the Nuclear Peace Hypothesis - A Quantitative Approach".
1016: 879: 846: 788: 713: 541: 505: 479: 409: 341: 142: 127: 122: 117: 53: 1000: 17: 941: 838: 728:
and spent substantial amounts of money and manpower on gaining relative influence over the
681: 593: 500: 484: 424: 63: 901:"The Stability-Instability Paradox, Misperception, and Escalation Control in South Asia" 566: 152: 100: 30: 1043: 778: 693: 618: 608: 419: 953: 697: 613: 464: 321: 873: 809: 971: 875:
The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon
729: 709: 628: 623: 576: 454: 434: 370: 336: 311: 302: 705: 701: 945: 850: 561: 474: 469: 459: 348: 996: 689: 400: 365: 858: 826: 316: 38: 988: 842: 429: 326: 1004: 700:never engaged each other in warfare, but fought 766: 811:The Balance of Power and the Balance of Terror 1024: 972:https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2017.1366623 653: 273: 8: 1031: 1017: 906:. The Henry Stimson Center. Archived from 660: 646: 291: 280: 266: 37: 26: 827:"Why Nuclear Superiority Doesn't Matter" 800: 528: 492: 444: 399: 383: 301: 294: 160: 45: 29: 572:Forum (alternative dispute resolution) 7: 985: 983: 764:The stability–instability paradox: 1003:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 25: 987: 748:This effect can be seen in the 1050:International relations theory 934:Journal of Conflict Resolution 738:Journal of Conflict Resolution 678:international relations theory 537:Alternative dispute resolution 1: 808:Snyder, Glenn Herald (1965). 674:stability–instability paradox 18:Stability-instability paradox 878:. Cornell University Press. 686:mutually assured destruction 968:The Nonproliferation Review 831:Political Science Quarterly 750:India–Pakistan relationship 1076: 982: 604:Peace and conflict studies 511:Mutual assured destruction 735:A study published in the 946:10.1177/0022002708330387 680:regarding the effect of 599:Non-aggression principle 557:Conflict style inventory 361:Nonviolent Communication 872:Jervis, Robert (1989). 825:Jervis, Robert (1979). 446:International relations 376:Speaking truth to power 999:-related article is a 770: 752:and to some degree in 754:Russia–NATO relations 521:Nuclear proliferation 587:Paradox of tolerance 162:Nuclear-armed states 743:strategic stability 516:Nuclear disarmament 415:Conflict escalation 392:Conflict management 296:Conflict resolution 784:Minimal deterrence 634:Track II diplomacy 582:Prisoner's dilemma 552:Conflict continuum 547:Conflict avoidance 332:Dispute resolution 1012: 1011: 913:on 12 August 2017 899:Krepon, Michael. 885:978-0-8014-9565-6 789:Deterrence theory 670: 669: 542:Anti-war movement 506:Nuclear blackmail 410:Communal violence 290: 289: 54:Nuclear explosion 16:(Redirected from 1067: 1033: 1026: 1019: 991: 984: 974: 964: 958: 957: 929: 923: 922: 920: 918: 912: 905: 896: 890: 889: 869: 863: 862: 822: 816: 815: 805: 662: 655: 648: 292: 282: 275: 268: 219: 113:Target selection 41: 27: 21: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 980: 978: 977: 970:, 24(1-2), 86, 965: 961: 931: 930: 926: 916: 914: 910: 903: 898: 897: 893: 886: 871: 870: 866: 843:10.2307/2149629 824: 823: 819: 807: 806: 802: 797: 775: 762: 682:nuclear weapons 666: 594:Liaison officer 501:Nuclear warfare 485:Multilateralism 425:Just war theory 286: 237: 217: 207: 176: 31:Nuclear weapons 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1073: 1071: 1063: 1062: 1060:Military stubs 1057: 1052: 1042: 1041: 1036: 1035: 1028: 1021: 1013: 1010: 1009: 992: 976: 975: 959: 940:(2): 258–277. 924: 891: 884: 864: 837:(4): 617–633. 817: 799: 798: 796: 793: 792: 791: 786: 781: 774: 771: 761: 758: 668: 667: 665: 664: 657: 650: 642: 639: 638: 637: 636: 631: 626: 621: 616: 611: 606: 601: 596: 591: 590: 589: 584: 574: 569: 567:Family therapy 564: 559: 554: 549: 544: 539: 531: 530: 526: 525: 524: 523: 518: 513: 508: 503: 495: 494: 490: 489: 488: 487: 482: 477: 472: 467: 462: 457: 449: 448: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 437: 427: 422: 417: 412: 404: 403: 397: 396: 395: 394: 386: 385: 381: 380: 379: 378: 373: 368: 363: 358: 357: 356: 354:Party-directed 346: 345: 344: 339: 334: 324: 319: 314: 306: 305: 299: 298: 288: 287: 285: 284: 277: 270: 262: 259: 258: 257: 256: 251: 246: 241: 231: 230: 225: 220: 211: 201: 200: 195: 190: 188:United Kingdom 185: 180: 165: 164: 158: 157: 156: 155: 150: 145: 140: 135: 130: 125: 120: 115: 110: 104: 103: 98: 93: 87: 86: 81: 76: 71: 66: 61: 56: 48: 47: 43: 42: 34: 33: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1072: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1047: 1045: 1034: 1029: 1027: 1022: 1020: 1015: 1014: 1008: 1006: 1002: 998: 993: 990: 986: 981: 973: 969: 963: 960: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 935: 928: 925: 909: 902: 895: 892: 887: 881: 877: 876: 868: 865: 860: 856: 852: 848: 844: 840: 836: 832: 828: 821: 818: 813: 812: 804: 801: 794: 790: 787: 785: 782: 780: 779:Nuclear peace 777: 776: 772: 769: 765: 759: 757: 755: 751: 746: 744: 740: 739: 733: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 694:United States 691: 687: 683: 679: 675: 663: 658: 656: 651: 649: 644: 643: 641: 640: 635: 632: 630: 627: 625: 622: 620: 619:Peacebuilding 617: 615: 612: 610: 609:Peace process 607: 605: 602: 600: 597: 595: 592: 588: 585: 583: 580: 579: 578: 575: 573: 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 553: 550: 548: 545: 543: 540: 538: 535: 534: 533: 532: 527: 522: 519: 517: 514: 512: 509: 507: 504: 502: 499: 498: 497: 496: 491: 486: 483: 481: 478: 476: 473: 471: 468: 466: 463: 461: 458: 456: 453: 452: 451: 450: 447: 443: 436: 433: 432: 431: 428: 426: 423: 421: 420:De-escalation 418: 416: 413: 411: 408: 407: 406: 405: 402: 398: 393: 390: 389: 388: 387: 382: 377: 374: 372: 369: 367: 364: 362: 359: 355: 352: 351: 350: 347: 343: 342:Collaborative 340: 338: 335: 333: 330: 329: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 309: 308: 307: 304: 300: 297: 293: 283: 278: 276: 271: 269: 264: 263: 261: 260: 255: 252: 250: 247: 245: 242: 240: 236: 233: 232: 229: 226: 224: 221: 215: 212: 210: 206: 203: 202: 199: 196: 194: 191: 189: 186: 184: 181: 179: 178:United States 175: 173: 169: 168: 167: 166: 163: 159: 154: 151: 149: 146: 144: 141: 139: 136: 134: 133:Proliferation 131: 129: 126: 124: 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 109: 106: 105: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 88: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 65: 62: 60: 57: 55: 52: 51: 50: 49: 44: 40: 36: 35: 32: 28: 19: 1005:expanding it 994: 979: 967: 962: 937: 933: 927: 915:. Retrieved 908:the original 894: 874: 867: 834: 830: 820: 810: 803: 767: 763: 747: 736: 734: 698:Soviet Union 673: 671: 614:Peace treaty 465:Brinkmanship 322:Conciliation 239:South Africa 234: 218:(undeclared) 204: 170: 730:third world 726:Afghanistan 718:Middle East 629:Rule of man 624:Peacemaking 577:Game theory 455:Appeasement 371:Negotiation 337:Rule of law 312:Arbitration 303:Nonviolence 228:North Korea 138:Disarmament 1044:Categories 795:References 702:proxy wars 480:Deterrence 249:Kazakhstan 174:recognized 148:Opposition 46:Background 1055:Paradoxes 917:12 August 851:0032-3195 760:Mechanism 722:Nicaragua 562:Democracy 475:Diplomacy 470:Ceasefire 460:Armistice 384:Workplace 349:Mediation 143:Terrorism 128:Espionage 123:Blackmail 118:Arms race 997:military 954:34287191 773:See also 696:and the 690:Cold War 401:Violence 366:Pacifism 244:Belarus 223:Pakistan 108:Arsenals 79:Delivery 859:2149629 710:Vietnam 493:Nuclear 435:studies 317:Auction 254:Ukraine 96:Workers 91:Effects 74:Testing 64:Warfare 59:History 952:  882:  857:  849:  716:, the 714:Angola 676:is an 235:Former 216:  214:Israel 205:Others 193:France 183:Russia 153:Winter 101:Ethics 69:Design 995:This 950:S2CID 911:(PDF) 904:(PDF) 855:JSTOR 706:Korea 529:Other 209:India 198:China 84:Yield 1001:stub 919:2017 880:ISBN 847:ISSN 724:and 692:the 684:and 672:The 942:doi 839:doi 704:in 430:War 327:Law 172:NPT 1046:: 948:. 938:53 936:. 853:. 845:. 835:94 833:. 829:. 756:. 732:. 720:, 712:, 708:, 1032:e 1025:t 1018:v 1007:. 956:. 944:: 921:. 888:. 861:. 841:: 814:. 661:e 654:t 647:v 281:e 274:t 267:v 20:)

Index

Stability-instability paradox
Nuclear weapons
Photograph of a mock-up of the Little Boy nuclear weapon dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, in August 1945.
Nuclear explosion
History
Warfare
Design
Testing
Delivery
Yield
Effects
Workers
Ethics
Arsenals
Target selection
Arms race
Blackmail
Espionage
Proliferation
Disarmament
Terrorism
Opposition
Winter
Nuclear-armed states
NPT
United States
Russia
United Kingdom
France
China

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.