Knowledge (XXG)

Statute of repose

Source 📝

642:
restricting the time in which a plaintiff must bring suit. ... Congress has used the term "statute of limitations" when enacting statutes of repose. See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1)(B)(iii)(I)(aa) (2012 ed.) (creating a statute of repose and placing it in a provision entitled "Statute of limitations"); 42 U.S.C. § 2278 (same). And petitioner does not point out an example in which Congress has used the term "statute of repose." So the Court must proceed to examine other evidence of the meaning of the term "statute of limitations" as it is used in § 9658.
647:
the statute of limitations for a personal injury claim commencing on the date of the crash, but where a ten-year statute of repose on product liability claims will have already expired. The earlier expiration of the statute of repose will prevent the personal injury claim even before the statute of limitations starts to run.
713:
that an estate has been opened have their claims cut off, and cannot disturb the peaceful possession of the distributed assets by the heirs. These probate statutes are less controversial than statutes of repose in injury and product liability cases, as public policy favors the distribution of estates
658:
involves the potential liability of manufacturers, distributors and retailers for injuries that result from dangerous or defective products. For example, a statute of repose may bar an action from being commenced after a specific number of years from the date when the product was initially delivered.
620:
In simple terms, a statute of limitations may start to run at a date other than when a wrongful act or omission allegedly occurred, or may be extended based upon factors that delay the reasonable discovery of an injury or the plaintiff's ability to take action, while a statute of repose is triggered
662:
A product liability statute of repose may bar a remedy even before a cause of action arises. For example, if a defective product first sold to a consumer more than ten years ago causes an injury, a ten-year statute of repose (that starts on the product's original date of purchase) might bar a claim
646:
In many cases, both a statute of limitations and a statute of repose will apply to the same case, and a statute of repose may cut off liability even if the statute of limitations has not run. For example, a defect in an airplane might cause a crash twelve years after the date of initial sale, with
577:
A statute of repose is distinct from a statute of limitations, though their effects are very similar. Deadlines imposed by a statute of repose are enforced much more strictly than those of a statute of limitations. In contrast to a statute of limitations, a statute of repose "is designed to bar
641:
While the term "statute of limitations" has acquired a precise meaning, distinct from "statute of repose," and while that is its primary meaning, it must be acknowledged that the term "statute of limitations" is sometimes used in a less formal way. In that sense, it can refer to any provision
666:
Because statutes of repose impose an absolute bar for actions against manufacturers, typically based on the date that allegedly defective goods are delivered or installed rather than the date when they cause harm, they are strongly favored over a statute of limitations by
706:, or for the submission of claims by creditors that the estate owes them money. If such a claim is not brought within the prescribed period of time under which the claimant or creditor is authorized to act, the claim becomes barred by statutes of repose. 586:
focuses on requiring timeliness of action from an injured party, and thus may potentially be extended where a delay in commencing a legal action is not the injured party's fault. The operation of a statute of limitations can be avoided or
621:
by the completion of an act and is not ordinarily subject to extension or exception. For example, many U.S. states have laws that provide that when a construction project is "substantially completed," meaning that just those items on a "
628:
Although a statute of limitations and a statute of repose are different, the two concepts are sometimes confused, even by legislatures in their enactment of statutes. In a U.S. court case that reached the nation's
529: 605:
to conceal evidence of responsibility. Some statutes of limitations begin to run only when the injured party discovers or reasonably should have discovered the injury.
371: 522: 714:
to the heirs with all deliberate speed, and weighs against reopening estates trying to recover money from the heirs to whom it has already been distributed.
612:
focuses on immunizing the alleged injuring party from long-term liability, and thus may even be based on elapsed time from an event, even if the potential
515: 19: 578:
actions after a specified period of time has run from the occurrence of some event other than the injury which gave rise to the claim."
410: 630: 459: 179: 464: 415: 30: 61: 699: 420: 35: 561:
Statutes of repose exist in a number of contexts. Some jurisdictions have passed statutes of repose in the context of
405: 56: 170: 109: 72: 943: 333: 909: 948: 634: 551: 294: 289: 66: 672: 389: 326: 89: 668: 625:" remain, a statute of repose starts to run for claims relating to defective design or construction. 470: 138: 77: 858: 807: 883: 832: 782: 757: 710: 709:
Under a typical statute of repose, creditors of a decedent who do not act upon receiving actual or
321: 226: 200: 102: 562: 271: 241: 206: 846: 655: 455: 316: 311: 281: 613: 598: 276: 266: 165: 132: 400: 246: 937: 683: 589: 558:
that cuts off certain legal rights if they are not acted on by a specified deadline.
425: 731: 703: 594: 440: 236: 211: 196: 175: 44: 663:
even if the statute of limitations (which starts on the date of injury) does not.
687: 353: 123: 95: 622: 501: 445: 216: 382: 363: 358: 231: 160: 808:"P. Stolz Family Partnership LP v. Daum, 355 F.3d 92, 102 (2d Cir. 2004)" 494: 191: 148: 566: 555: 450: 256: 221: 679: 483: 702:. For example, legislatures often set deadlines for actions such as 758:"Gray v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 821 N.E.2d 431 (Ind.Ct.App 2005)" 343: 676: 602: 377: 884:"In re Estate of McNabb, 744 N.E.2d 569, (Ind. Ct. App. 2001)" 783:"Kissel v. Rosenbaum, 579 N.E.2d 1322, 1326 (Ind.Ct.App.1991)" 698:
Many jurisdictions have statutes of repose that relate to the
686:, statutes of repose are a part of legislative proposals for " 859:"In re Estate of Brown, 587 N.E.2d 686 (Ind. Ct. App. 1992)" 637:
to consistently observe the distinction when drafting laws:
833:"CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175, 2185 (2014)" 616:
cannot reasonably be discovered until a later date.
523: 8: 530: 516: 15: 633:, the court took note of the failure of 573:Difference from a statute of limitations 723: 601:of the injured party, or attempts by a 482: 342: 302: 255: 147: 122: 43: 18: 910:"Indiana Code, Title 29, Probate Code" 7: 700:administration of decedents' estates 14: 907:See, e.g., Sec. 29-1-14-1 of the 31:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 416:Notwithstanding verdict (JNOV) 1: 36:Doctrines of civil procedure 965: 171:Case Information Statement 917:Indiana State Legislature 406:As a matter of law (JMOL) 694:In estate administration 303:Resolution without trial 673:consumer organizations 644: 584:statute of limitations 552:statute of limitations 295:Request for production 290:Request for admissions 669:industry trade groups 639: 597:factors, such as the 328:Involuntary dismissal 738:. Cornell Law School 651:In product liability 546:(sometimes called a 471:Declaratory judgment 139:Forum non conveniens 22:in the United States 847:Ind. Code 34-20-3-1 732:"Statute of repose" 711:constructive notice 569:court proceedings. 421:Motion to set aside 322:Voluntary dismissal 227:Indispensable party 201:affirmative defense 845:See, for example, 563:products liability 272:Initial conference 257:Pretrial procedure 835:. Google Scholar. 656:Product liability 610:statute of repose 544:statute of repose 540: 539: 956: 928: 927: 925: 923: 914: 905: 899: 898: 896: 894: 880: 874: 873: 871: 869: 855: 849: 843: 837: 836: 829: 823: 822: 820: 818: 804: 798: 797: 795: 793: 779: 773: 772: 770: 768: 754: 748: 747: 745: 743: 728: 548:nonclaim statute 532: 525: 518: 329: 317:Summary judgment 312:Default judgment 62:Federal question 16: 964: 963: 959: 958: 957: 955: 954: 953: 944:Civil procedure 934: 933: 932: 931: 921: 919: 912: 908: 906: 902: 892: 890: 882: 881: 877: 867: 865: 857: 856: 852: 844: 840: 831: 830: 826: 816: 814: 806: 805: 801: 791: 789: 781: 780: 776: 766: 764: 756: 755: 751: 741: 739: 730: 729: 725: 720: 696: 671:and opposed by 653: 614:cause of action 593:by a number of 575: 536: 507: 476: 443: 434: 403: 394: 390:Burden of proof 338: 327: 286: 277:Interrogatories 251: 185: 166:Cause of action 163: 133:Change of venue 116: 92: 83: 71: 59: 21: 20:Civil procedure 12: 11: 5: 962: 960: 952: 951: 946: 936: 935: 930: 929: 900: 888:Google Scholar 875: 863:Google Scholar 850: 838: 824: 812:Google Scholar 799: 787:Google Scholar 774: 762:Google Scholar 749: 722: 721: 719: 716: 695: 692: 652: 649: 618: 617: 606: 574: 571: 538: 537: 535: 534: 527: 520: 512: 509: 508: 506: 505: 498: 490: 487: 486: 480: 479: 478: 477: 475: 474: 468: 462: 456:Attorney's fee 453: 448: 437: 435: 433: 432: 423: 418: 413: 408: 397: 393: 392: 387: 375: 368: 367: 366: 361: 350: 347: 346: 340: 339: 337: 336: 331: 324: 319: 314: 308: 305: 304: 300: 299: 298: 297: 292: 285: 284: 279: 274: 269: 263: 260: 259: 253: 252: 250: 249: 244: 239: 234: 229: 224: 219: 214: 209: 204: 194: 188: 187: 186: 184: 183: 173: 168: 157: 152: 151: 145: 144: 143: 142: 135: 127: 126: 120: 119: 118: 117: 115: 114: 106: 99: 86: 84: 82: 81: 75: 69: 64: 57:Subject-matter 53: 48: 47: 41: 40: 39: 38: 33: 25: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 961: 950: 949:Statutory law 947: 945: 942: 941: 939: 918: 911: 904: 901: 889: 885: 879: 876: 864: 860: 854: 851: 848: 842: 839: 834: 828: 825: 813: 809: 803: 800: 788: 784: 778: 775: 763: 759: 753: 750: 737: 733: 727: 724: 717: 715: 712: 707: 705: 704:will contests 701: 693: 691: 689: 685: 684:United States 681: 678: 674: 670: 664: 660: 657: 650: 648: 643: 638: 636: 632: 631:Supreme Court 626: 624: 615: 611: 607: 604: 600: 596: 592: 591: 585: 581: 580: 579: 572: 570: 568: 565:law, or for 564: 559: 557: 553: 549: 545: 533: 528: 526: 521: 519: 514: 513: 511: 510: 504: 503: 499: 497: 496: 492: 491: 489: 488: 485: 481: 472: 469: 466: 463: 461: 460:American rule 457: 454: 452: 449: 447: 442: 439: 438: 436: 430: 428: 424: 422: 419: 417: 414: 412: 409: 407: 402: 399: 398: 396: 395: 391: 388: 385: 384: 379: 376: 374: 373: 369: 365: 362: 360: 357: 356: 355: 352: 351: 349: 348: 345: 341: 335: 332: 330: 325: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 309: 307: 306: 301: 296: 293: 291: 288: 287: 283: 280: 278: 275: 273: 270: 268: 265: 264: 262: 261: 258: 254: 248: 247:Other motions 245: 243: 240: 238: 235: 233: 230: 228: 225: 223: 220: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208: 205: 202: 198: 195: 193: 190: 189: 181: 177: 174: 172: 169: 167: 162: 159: 158: 156: 155: 154: 153: 150: 146: 141: 140: 136: 134: 131: 130: 129: 128: 125: 121: 112: 111: 107: 105: 104: 100: 98: 97: 91: 88: 87: 85: 79: 76: 74: 70: 68: 65: 63: 58: 55: 54: 52: 51: 50: 49: 46: 42: 37: 34: 32: 29: 28: 27: 26: 23: 17: 920:. Retrieved 916: 903: 891:. Retrieved 887: 878: 866:. Retrieved 862: 853: 841: 827: 815:. Retrieved 811: 802: 790:. Retrieved 786: 777: 765:. Retrieved 761: 752: 740:. Retrieved 735: 726: 708: 697: 665: 661: 654: 645: 640: 627: 619: 609: 588: 583: 576: 560: 547: 543: 541: 500: 493: 465:English rule 426: 411:Renewed JMOL 381: 370: 242:Intervention 237:Interpleader 212:Counterclaim 176:Class action 137: 110:Quasi in rem 108: 101: 94: 73:Supplemental 45:Jurisdiction 688:tort reform 429:(new trial) 282:Depositions 96:In personam 938:Categories 718:References 682:. In the 623:punch list 603:tortfeasor 550:), like a 502:Certiorari 446:Injunction 334:Settlement 217:Crossclaim 922:17 August 893:17 August 868:17 August 817:17 August 792:17 August 767:17 August 742:17 August 595:equitable 383:voir dire 364:defendant 359:plaintiff 267:Discovery 232:Impleader 161:Complaint 149:Pleadings 67:Diversity 635:Congress 599:minority 495:Mandamus 401:Judgment 192:Demurrer 182:) ) 180:2005 Act 90:Personal 680:lawyers 567:probate 556:statute 554:, is a 451:Damages 431: ) 427:De novo 380: ( 354:Parties 222:Joinder 199: ( 178: ( 78:Removal 590:tolled 484:Appeal 441:Remedy 372:Pro se 197:Answer 103:In rem 913:(PDF) 344:Trial 207:Reply 124:Venue 924:2017 895:2017 870:2017 819:2017 794:2017 769:2017 744:2017 690:". 677:tort 675:and 378:Jury 736:Wex 940:: 915:. 886:. 861:. 810:. 785:. 760:. 734:. 608:A 582:A 542:A 926:. 897:. 872:. 821:. 796:. 771:. 746:. 531:e 524:t 517:v 473:) 467:) 458:( 444:( 404:( 386:) 203:) 164:( 113:) 93:( 80:) 60:(

Index

Civil procedure
in the United States

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Doctrines of civil procedure
Jurisdiction
Subject-matter
Federal question
Diversity
Supplemental
Removal
Personal
In personam
In rem
Quasi in rem
Venue
Change of venue
Forum non conveniens
Pleadings
Complaint
Cause of action
Case Information Statement
Class action
2005 Act
Demurrer
Answer
affirmative defense
Reply
Counterclaim
Crossclaim
Joinder
Indispensable party

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.