Knowledge

Stevens's power law

Source 📝

36: 654:), subjects are free to choose their own standard, assigning any number to the first stimulus and all subsequent ones with the only requirement being that the ratio between sensations and numbers is preserved. In magnitude production a number and a reference stimulus is given and subjects produce a stimulus that is perceived as that number times the reference. Also used is 869:), under the condition that respondents' numerical distortion function and the psychophysical functions could be separated, formulated a behavioral condition equivalent to the psychophysical function being a power function. This condition was confirmed for just over half the respondents, and the power form was found to be a reasonable approximation for the rest ( 650:. For subsequent stimuli, subjects report numerically their perceived intensity relative to the standard so as to preserve the ratio between the sensations and the numerical estimates (e.g., a sound perceived twice as loud as the standard should be given a number twice the modulus). In magnitude estimation without a standard (usually just 884:
perceived intensity; i.e. one that is independent of contextual factors and conditions. Consistent with this, Luce (1990, p. 73) observed that "by introducing contexts such as background noise in loudness judgements, the shape of the magnitude estimation functions certainly deviates sharply from
670:
A principal criticism has been that Stevens' approach provides neither a direct test of the power law itself nor the underlying assumptions of the magnitude estimation/production method: it simply fits curves to data points. In addition, the power law can be deduced mathematically from the
658:, which generally involves subjects altering the magnitude of one physical quantity, such as the brightness of a light, so that its perceived intensity is equal to the perceived intensity of another type of quantity, such as warmth or pressure. 675:, 1978). As with all psychometric studies, Stevens' approach ignores individual differences in the stimulus-sensation relationship, and there are generally large individual differences in this relationship that averaging the data will obscure ( 666:
Stevens generally collected magnitude estimation data from multiple observers, averaged the data across subjects, and then fitted a power function to the data. Because the fit was generally reasonable, he concluded the power law was correct.
865:
Critics of the power law also point out that the validity of the law is contingent on the measurement of perceived stimulus intensity that is employed in the relevant experiments. (
1152:
Steingrimsson, R.; Luce, R.D. (2006), "Empirical evaluation of a model of global psychophysical judgments: III. A form for the psychophysical function and intensity filtering",
583: 520:, which is based on a logarithmic relationship between stimulus and sensation, because the power law describes a wider range of sensory comparisons, down to zero intensity. 615:, where stimuli can only be discriminated with a probability around 50%, and global psychophysics, where the stimuli can be discriminated correctly with near certainty ( 118: 531:
had been suggested by 19th-century researchers, Stevens is credited with reviving the law and publishing a body of psychophysical data to support it in 1957.
1122:
Luce, R. D. & Krumhansl, C. (1988) Measurement, scaling, and psychophysics. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.)
993:
Ellermeier, W.; Faulhammer, G. (2000), "Empirical evaluation of axioms fundamental to Stevens's ratio-scaling approach: I. Loudness production",
1211: 714:) formulated a testable property capturing the implicit underlying assumption this assertion entailed. Specifically, for two proportions 975:
MacKay, D. M. Psychophysics of perceived intensity: A theoretical basis for Fechner's and Stevens' laws. Science, 1963, 139, 1213–1216.
1145: 79: 57: 1282: 774:. This amounts to assuming that respondents interpret numbers in a veridical way. This property was unambiguously rejected ( 605: 1267: 885:
a power function". Indeed, nearly all sensory judgments can be changed by the context in which a stimulus is perceived.
592:
is the intensity or strength of the stimulus in physical units (energy, weight, pressure, mixture proportions, etc.), ψ(
786:) formulated another property that, if sustained, meant that respondents could make ratio scaled judgments, namely, if 682:
Stevens' main assertion was that using magnitude estimations/productions respondents were able to make judgements on a
623:
are generally applied in local psychophysics, whereas Stevens' methods are usually applied in global psychophysics.
1287: 50: 44: 877: 671:
Weber-Fechner logarithmic function (Mackay, 1963), and the relation makes predictions consistent with data (
513: 1277: 1074: 61: 1065:
Luce, R.D. (2002), "A psychophysical theory of intensity proportions, joint presentations, and matches",
517: 524: 540: 932: 1079: 1272: 1262: 1023:
Greem, D.M.; Luce, R.D. (1974), "Variability of magnitude estimates: a timing theory analysis",
984:
Staddon, J. E. R.)]. Theory of behavioral power functions. Psychological Review, 85, 305–320.
1241: 1207: 1189: 1141: 1092: 1012: 958: 950: 1202: 1231: 1181: 1161: 1112: 1084: 1054: 1032: 1002: 940: 707: 634:
The principal methods used by Stevens to measure the perceived intensity of a stimulus were
516:
increase in the sensation created by the stimulus. It is often considered to supersede the
620: 271: 642:. In magnitude estimation with a standard, the experimenter presents a stimulus called a 936: 616: 103: 1256: 683: 612: 509: 512:
between an increased intensity or strength in a physical stimulus and the perceived
1129: 469: 179: 945: 920: 27:
Empirical relationship between actual and perceived changed intensity of stimulus
17: 1088: 600:
is an exponent that depends on the type of stimulation or sensory modality, and
1165: 1137: 1058: 894: 954: 528: 284: 1245: 1203:
Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects
1193: 1116: 1096: 1016: 962: 880:, whether any given stimulus is actually associated with a particular and 1236: 1219: 1037: 1007: 619:& Krumhansl, 1988). The Weber–Fechner law and methods described by 297: 258: 1220:"Examining the validity of numerical ratios in loudness fractionation" 1185: 672: 1134:
International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences
1045:
Luce, R.D. (1990), "Psychophysical laws: cross-modal matching",
899: 694:
are values on a given ratio scale, then there exists a constant
626:
The table to the right lists the exponents reported by Stevens.
854:. This property has been sustained in a variety of situations ( 29: 1103:
Narens, L. (1996), "A theory of ratio magnitude estimation",
596:) is the magnitude of the sensation evoked by the stimulus, 782:). Without assuming veridical interpretation of numbers, ( 876:
It has also been questioned, particularly in terms of
543: 106: 855: 775: 1172:Stevens, S.S. (1957). "On the psychophysical law". 577: 112: 1200:Stevens, S.S. (1975), Geraldine Stevens, editor. 870: 8: 1124:Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology 919:Buchsbaum, M.; Stevens, S. S. (1971-04-30). 611:A distinction has been made between local 523:The theory is named after psychophysicist 91: 1235: 1078: 1036: 1006: 944: 676: 608:constant that depends on the units used. 566: 542: 105: 80:Learn how and when to remove this message 43:This article includes a list of general 911: 921:"Neural Events and Psychophysical Law" 859: 783: 779: 711: 527:(1906–1973). Although the idea of a 7: 866: 135:Sound pressure of 3000 Hz tone 646:and assigns it a number called the 157:Amplitude of 250 Hz on finger 1154:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1105:Journal of Mathematical Psychology 146:Amplitude of 60 Hz on finger 49:it lacks sufficient corresponding 25: 1140:. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier. 1126:. New York: Wiley. Pp. 1–74. 856:Ellermeier & Faulhammer 2000 776:Ellermeier & Faulhammer 2000 578:{\displaystyle \psi (I)=kI^{a},} 508:is an empirical relationship in 343:Irradiation of skin, large area 332:Irradiation of skin, small area 34: 534:The general form of the law is 1224:Perception & Psychophysics 1025:Perception & Psychophysics 995:Perception & Psychophysics 553: 547: 1: 1132:, & Baltes, P.B. (2001). 946:10.1126/science.170.3962.1043 871:Steingrimsson & Luce 2006 203:Point source briefly flashed 1089:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.520 214:Reflectance of gray papers 1304: 1206:, Transaction Publishers, 1166:10.1016/j.jmp.2005.11.005 1059:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.66 453:Stirring silicone fluids 464:Current through fingers 1283:Mathematical psychology 878:signal detection theory 656:cross-modality matching 365:Whole-body irradiation 354:Whole-body irradiation 64:more precise citations. 1117:10.1006/jmps.1996.0011 579: 114: 722:, and three stimuli, 706:). In the context of 677:Greem & Luce 1974 580: 525:Stanley Smith Stevens 477:Vocal sound pressure 420:Static force on skin 387:Rubbing emery cloths 376:Radiant heat on skin 321:Metal contact on arm 310:Metal contact on arm 115: 1174:Psychological Review 1067:Psychological Review 1047:Psychological Review 652:magnitude estimation 640:magnitude production 636:magnitude estimation 541: 499:White-noise stimuli 482:Angular acceleration 431:Static contractions 409:Thickness of blocks 241:Redness (saturation) 104: 1268:Behavioral concepts 1218:Zimmer, K. (2005). 937:1971Sci...172..502B 770:should be equal to 124:Stimulus condition 1237:10.3758/bf03193515 1038:10.3758/BF03213947 1008:10.3758/BF03212151 575: 506:Stevens' power law 168:5° target in dark 110: 1212:978-0-88738-643-5 518:Weber–Fechner law 503: 502: 398:Squeezing rubber 381:Tactual roughness 247:Red–gray mixture 236:Projected square 113:{\displaystyle a} 90: 89: 82: 18:Stevens power law 16:(Redirected from 1295: 1249: 1239: 1197: 1186:10.1037/h0046162 1168: 1119: 1099: 1082: 1061: 1041: 1040: 1019: 1010: 1001:(8): 1505–1511, 985: 982: 976: 973: 967: 966: 948: 916: 853: 842: 831: 816: 710:psychophysics, ( 584: 582: 581: 576: 571: 570: 414:Pressure on palm 392:Tactual hardness 359:Discomfort, warm 348:Discomfort, cold 121: 119: 117: 116: 111: 92: 85: 78: 74: 71: 65: 60:this article by 51:inline citations 38: 37: 30: 21: 1303: 1302: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1288:Psychoacoustics 1253: 1252: 1217: 1171: 1151: 1138:pp. 15105–15106 1102: 1080:10.1.1.320.6454 1064: 1044: 1022: 992: 989: 988: 983: 979: 974: 970: 918: 917: 913: 908: 891: 851: 840: 829: 814: 664: 632: 621:L. L. Thurstone 606:proportionality 562: 539: 538: 442:Lifted weights 225:Projected line 102: 101: 99: 86: 75: 69: 66: 56:Please help to 55: 39: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1301: 1299: 1291: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1275: 1270: 1265: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1230:(4): 569–579. 1215: 1198: 1180:(3): 153–181. 1169: 1149: 1127: 1120: 1111:(2): 109–129, 1100: 1073:(3): 520–532, 1062: 1042: 1031:(2): 291–300, 1020: 987: 986: 977: 968: 931:(3962): 1043. 910: 909: 907: 904: 903: 902: 897: 890: 887: 663: 660: 631: 628: 586: 585: 574: 569: 565: 561: 558: 555: 552: 549: 546: 501: 500: 497: 494: 490: 489: 486: 483: 479: 478: 475: 472: 466: 465: 462: 459: 458:Electric shock 455: 454: 451: 448: 444: 443: 440: 437: 433: 432: 429: 426: 422: 421: 418: 415: 411: 410: 407: 404: 400: 399: 396: 393: 389: 388: 385: 382: 378: 377: 374: 371: 367: 366: 363: 360: 356: 355: 352: 349: 345: 344: 341: 338: 334: 333: 330: 327: 323: 322: 319: 316: 312: 311: 308: 305: 301: 300: 295: 292: 288: 287: 282: 279: 275: 274: 269: 266: 262: 261: 256: 253: 249: 248: 245: 242: 238: 237: 234: 231: 227: 226: 223: 220: 216: 215: 212: 209: 205: 204: 201: 198: 194: 193: 190: 187: 183: 182: 177: 174: 170: 169: 166: 163: 159: 158: 155: 152: 148: 147: 144: 141: 137: 136: 133: 130: 126: 125: 122: 109: 96: 88: 87: 42: 40: 33: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1300: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1278:Psychophysics 1276: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1264: 1261: 1260: 1258: 1247: 1243: 1238: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1216: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1170: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1150: 1147: 1146:0-08-043076-7 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1130:Smelser, N.J. 1128: 1125: 1121: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1101: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1081: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1063: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1043: 1039: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1021: 1018: 1014: 1009: 1004: 1000: 996: 991: 990: 981: 978: 972: 969: 964: 960: 956: 952: 947: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 922: 915: 912: 905: 901: 898: 896: 893: 892: 888: 886: 883: 879: 874: 872: 868: 863: 861: 857: 850: 847:should equal 846: 839: 835: 828: 824: 820: 813: 809: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 777: 773: 769: 765: 761: 757: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 689: 685: 680: 678: 674: 668: 661: 659: 657: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 629: 627: 624: 622: 618: 614: 613:psychophysics 609: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 572: 567: 563: 559: 556: 550: 544: 537: 536: 535: 532: 530: 526: 521: 519: 515: 511: 510:psychophysics 507: 498: 495: 492: 491: 488:5 s rotation 487: 484: 481: 480: 476: 473: 471: 468: 467: 463: 460: 457: 456: 452: 449: 446: 445: 441: 438: 435: 434: 430: 427: 424: 423: 419: 416: 413: 412: 408: 405: 402: 401: 397: 394: 391: 390: 386: 383: 380: 379: 375: 372: 369: 368: 364: 361: 358: 357: 353: 350: 347: 346: 342: 339: 336: 335: 331: 328: 325: 324: 320: 317: 314: 313: 309: 306: 303: 302: 299: 296: 293: 290: 289: 286: 283: 280: 277: 276: 273: 270: 267: 264: 263: 260: 257: 254: 251: 250: 246: 243: 240: 239: 235: 232: 229: 228: 224: 221: 219:Visual length 218: 217: 213: 210: 207: 206: 202: 199: 196: 195: 191: 188: 185: 184: 181: 178: 175: 172: 171: 167: 164: 161: 160: 156: 153: 150: 149: 145: 142: 139: 138: 134: 131: 128: 127: 123: 107: 97: 94: 93: 84: 81: 73: 63: 59: 53: 52: 46: 41: 32: 31: 19: 1227: 1223: 1201: 1177: 1173: 1160:(1): 15–29, 1157: 1153: 1133: 1123: 1108: 1104: 1070: 1066: 1053:(1): 66–77, 1050: 1046: 1028: 1024: 998: 994: 980: 971: 928: 924: 914: 881: 875: 864: 848: 844: 837: 833: 826: 822: 818: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 703: 699: 695: 691: 687: 681: 669: 665: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 633: 625: 610: 601: 597: 593: 589: 587: 533: 522: 505: 504: 470:Vocal effort 425:Muscle force 370:Thermal pain 192:Brief flash 180:Point source 76: 67: 48: 860:Zimmer 2005 784:Narens 1996 780:Zimmer 2005 712:Narens 1996 684:ratio scale 403:Finger span 230:Visual area 70:August 2023 62:introducing 1273:Power laws 1263:Perception 1257:Categories 906:References 895:Perception 832:is judged 817:is judged 802:is judged 790:is judged 750:is judged 738:is judged 698:such that 686:(i.e., if 662:Criticisms 197:Brightness 186:Brightness 173:Brightness 162:Brightness 45:references 1075:CiteSeerX 955:0036-8075 867:Luce 2002 810:, and if 708:axiomatic 545:ψ 529:power law 514:magnitude 447:Viscosity 436:Heaviness 285:Saccharin 208:Lightness 151:Vibration 140:Vibration 98:Exponent 95:Continuum 1246:16134452 1194:13441853 1097:12088243 1017:11140174 889:See also 882:absolute 644:standard 493:Duration 129:Loudness 963:5550509 933:Bibcode 925:Science 843:, then 758:, then 673:Staddon 648:modulus 630:Methods 298:Heptane 259:Sucrose 58:improve 1244:  1210:  1192:  1144:  1095:  1077:  1015:  961:  953:  836:times 821:times 806:times 794:times 766:times 754:times 742:times 588:where 337:Warmth 326:Warmth 315:Warmth 47:, but 852:' 841:' 830:' 815:' 734:, if 604:is a 291:Smell 278:Taste 265:Taste 252:Taste 1242:PMID 1208:ISBN 1190:PMID 1142:ISBN 1093:PMID 1013:PMID 959:PMID 951:ISSN 900:Sone 718:and 690:and 638:and 617:Luce 450:0.42 439:1.45 304:Cold 272:Salt 165:0.33 143:0.95 132:0.67 1232:doi 1182:doi 1162:doi 1113:doi 1085:doi 1071:109 1055:doi 1033:doi 1003:doi 941:doi 929:170 873:). 862:). 679:). 496:1.1 485:1.4 474:1.1 461:3.5 428:1.7 417:1.1 406:1.3 395:0.8 384:1.5 362:0.7 351:1.7 340:0.7 329:1.3 318:1.6 294:0.6 281:0.8 268:1.4 255:1.3 244:1.7 233:0.7 211:1.2 189:0.5 176:0.5 154:0.6 1259:: 1240:. 1228:67 1226:. 1222:. 1188:. 1178:64 1176:. 1158:50 1156:, 1136:. 1109:40 1107:, 1091:, 1083:, 1069:, 1051:97 1049:, 1029:15 1027:, 1011:, 999:62 997:, 957:. 949:. 939:. 927:. 923:. 858:, 825:, 798:, 778:, 764:pq 762:= 746:, 730:, 726:, 704:ky 702:= 1248:. 1234:: 1214:. 1196:. 1184:: 1164:: 1148:. 1115:: 1087:: 1057:: 1035:: 1005:: 965:. 943:: 935:: 849:z 845:z 838:y 834:p 827:z 823:x 819:q 812:y 808:y 804:q 800:z 796:x 792:p 788:y 772:z 768:x 760:t 756:y 752:q 748:z 744:x 740:p 736:y 732:z 728:y 724:x 720:q 716:p 700:x 696:k 692:y 688:x 602:k 598:a 594:I 590:I 573:, 568:a 564:I 560:k 557:= 554:) 551:I 548:( 373:1 307:1 222:1 200:1 120:) 108:a 100:( 83:) 77:( 72:) 68:( 54:. 20:)

Index

Stevens power law
references
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message
Point source
Sucrose
Salt
Saccharin
Heptane
Vocal effort
psychophysics
magnitude
Weber–Fechner law
Stanley Smith Stevens
power law
proportionality
psychophysics
Luce
L. L. Thurstone
Staddon
Greem & Luce 1974
ratio scale
axiomatic
Narens 1996
Ellermeier & Faulhammer 2000
Zimmer 2005
Narens 1996
Ellermeier & Faulhammer 2000

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.