Knowledge (XXG)

Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.

Source 📝

515: 42: 138:
The private right of action under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 does not extend to aiders and abettors. Because the conduct of a secondary actor must therefore satisfy each of the elements for §10(b) liability, the plaintiff must prove reliance upon a material misrepresentation or
285:. Such defendants can only be held liable if their own conduct satisfies each of the elements for §10(b) liability. Therefore, the plaintiff must prove reliance, in making a decision to acquire or hold a security, upon a material misrepresentation or omission by the defendant. 325: 590: 386: 126: 93: 394: 595: 580: 575: 409: 585: 556: 522: 262: 46: 282: 270: 17: 549: 514: 417: 247: 85: 542: 299: 278: 194: 348: 293: 274: 461: 265:
pertaining to the scope of liability of secondary actors, such as lawyers and accountants, for
494: 305: 162: 526: 448: 266: 186: 174: 198: 170: 65:
Stoneridge Investment Partners, L.L.C., Petitioner v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., et al.
569: 311: 108: 74: 367: 206: 182: 154: 88: 481:
Walter, David (2008). "Developments in US Securities Litigation: The Decision in
452: 297:
as the "most important securities fraud case in years," and also commented by
104: 498: 100: 326:
Central Bank of Denver, N.A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A.
277:, the Court held that "aiders and abettors" of fraud cannot be held 466:, Primary Liability, and the Need to Properly Define Section 10(b)" 236:
Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
41: 530: 591:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
127:
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
258:
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
35:
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
18:
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
483:
Stoneridge Investment Partners v Scientific-Atlanta
240: 227: 219: 214: 143: 132: 121: 116: 80: 70: 60: 53: 34: 223:Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito 410:"StoneRidge Ruling Shields Third-Party Advisers" 366:Bravin, Jess; Scannel, Kara (January 16, 2008). 281:under the private right of action authorized by 550: 349:"Supreme Court Restricts Securities Lawsuits" 261:, 552 U.S. 148 (2008), was a decision by the 8: 107:1091; 76 U.S.L.W. 4039; Fed. Sec. L. Rep. ( 557: 543: 368:"Top Court Limits Shareholder Fraud Suits" 31: 273:. In a 5-3 decision authored by Justice 339: 111:) ¶ 94,556; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 46 408:McCollam, Douglas (January 15, 2008). 347:Greenhouse, Linda (January 15, 2008). 385:Wingfield, Brian (January 15, 2008). 29:2008 United States Supreme Court case 7: 511: 509: 487:Journal of International Banking Law 231:Stevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg 529:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 523:Supreme Court of the United States 47:Supreme Court of the United States 25: 596:United States Supreme Court stubs 581:United States securities case law 576:United States Supreme Court cases 439:case – much ado about nothing?". 513: 441:Journal of Investment Compliance 40: 271:Securities Exchange Act of 1934 586:2008 in United States case law 1: 521:This article related to the 435:Edison, Andrew (2008). "The 263:United States Supreme Court 612: 508: 387:"Stoneridge And The Court" 283:§10(b) of the Exchange Act 139:omission by the defendant. 460:Souza, Travis S. (2008). 453:10.1108/15285810810859243 245: 235: 148: 137: 39: 56:Decided January 15, 2008 248:Securities Exchange Act 54:Argued October 9, 2007 462:"Freedom to Defraud: 246:Section 10(b) of the 420:on January 19, 2008. 397:on January 18, 2008. 99:128 S. Ct. 761; 169 372:Wall Street Journal 300:Wall Street Journal 195:Ruth Bader Ginsburg 294:The New York Times 291:was recognized by 279:secondarily liable 275:Anthony M. Kennedy 159:Associate Justices 125:Certiorari to the 538: 537: 254: 253: 16:(Redirected from 603: 559: 552: 545: 517: 510: 502: 477: 470:Duke Law Journal 456: 422: 421: 416:. Archived from 405: 399: 398: 393:. Archived from 382: 376: 375: 363: 357: 356: 344: 267:securities fraud 144:Court membership 44: 43: 32: 21: 611: 610: 606: 605: 604: 602: 601: 600: 566: 565: 564: 563: 506: 480: 459: 434: 431: 429:Further reading 426: 425: 407: 406: 402: 384: 383: 379: 365: 364: 360: 346: 345: 341: 336: 321: 197: 187:Clarence Thomas 185: 175:Anthony Kennedy 173: 163:John P. Stevens 112: 55: 49: 30: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 609: 607: 599: 598: 593: 588: 583: 578: 568: 567: 562: 561: 554: 547: 539: 536: 535: 518: 504: 503: 493:(5): 267–270. 478: 457: 430: 427: 424: 423: 400: 377: 358: 353:New York Times 338: 337: 335: 332: 331: 330: 320: 317: 252: 251: 243: 242: 238: 237: 233: 232: 229: 225: 224: 221: 217: 216: 212: 211: 210: 209: 199:Stephen Breyer 171:Antonin Scalia 160: 157: 152: 146: 145: 141: 140: 135: 134: 130: 129: 123: 119: 118: 114: 113: 98: 82: 78: 77: 72: 68: 67: 62: 61:Full case name 58: 57: 51: 50: 45: 37: 36: 28: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 608: 597: 594: 592: 589: 587: 584: 582: 579: 577: 574: 573: 571: 560: 555: 553: 548: 546: 541: 540: 534: 532: 528: 524: 519: 516: 512: 507: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 479: 475: 471: 467: 465: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 433: 432: 428: 419: 415: 411: 404: 401: 396: 392: 388: 381: 378: 373: 369: 362: 359: 354: 350: 343: 340: 333: 328: 327: 323: 322: 318: 316: 314: 313: 312:Business Week 308: 307: 302: 301: 296: 295: 290: 286: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 259: 249: 244: 239: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 215:Case opinions 213: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 161: 158: 156: 153: 151:Chief Justice 150: 149: 147: 142: 136: 131: 128: 124: 120: 115: 110: 106: 102: 96: 95: 90: 87: 83: 79: 76: 73: 69: 66: 63: 59: 52: 48: 38: 33: 27: 19: 531:expanding it 520: 505: 490: 486: 482: 476:: 1179–1207. 473: 469: 463: 444: 440: 436: 418:the original 414:BusinessWeek 413: 403: 395:the original 390: 380: 371: 361: 352: 342: 324: 310: 304: 298: 292: 288: 287: 257: 256: 255: 241:Laws applied 207:Samuel Alito 202: 190: 183:David Souter 178: 166: 155:John Roberts 117:Case history 92: 64: 26: 570:Categories 464:Stoneridge 447:(1): 5–9. 437:Stoneridge 334:References 289:Stoneridge 269:under the 105:U.S. LEXIS 103:627; 2008 71:Docket no. 499:0267-937X 101:L. Ed. 2d 81:Citations 319:See also 220:Majority 228:Dissent 133:Holding 497:  391:Forbes 329:(1994) 309:, and 306:Forbes 205: 203:· 201:  193: 191:· 189:  181: 179:· 177:  169: 167:· 165:  525:is a 122:Prior 75:06-43 527:stub 495:ISSN 94:more 86:U.S. 84:552 485:". 449:doi 109:CCH 89:148 572:: 491:23 489:. 474:57 472:. 468:. 443:. 412:. 389:. 370:. 351:. 315:. 303:, 558:e 551:t 544:v 533:. 501:. 455:. 451:: 445:9 374:. 355:. 250:. 97:) 91:( 20:)

Index

Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta
Supreme Court of the United States
06-43
U.S.
148
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
CCH
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
John Roberts
John P. Stevens
Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy
David Souter
Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Securities Exchange Act
United States Supreme Court
securities fraud
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Anthony M. Kennedy
secondarily liable
§10(b) of the Exchange Act
The New York Times
Wall Street Journal
Forbes
Business Week

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.