Knowledge (XXG)

Suspect classification

Source 📝

541:, 122 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2010-08-05) ("The trial record shows that strict scrutiny is the appropriate standard of review to apply to legislative classifications based on sexual orientation. All classifications based on sexual orientation appear suspect, as the evidence shows that California would rarely, if ever, have a reason to categorize individuals based on their sexual orientation."), 357:
is used, it means that the classification is one that overwhelmingly tends to be rational, e.g. distinguishing criminals from non-criminals. This leads to wide political discretion and a focus of judicial resources to other cases where the classification employed tends to be more suspicious, and thus
336:
is involved, the courts are more likely to oppose the discriminatory law when compared to a rational basis review particularly if a law is based on gender. However, a court will likely uphold a discriminatory law under intermediate scrutiny if the law has an exceedingly persuasive justification and
236:
held sexual orientation to be a quasi-suspect classification, and determined that laws that classify people on such basis should be subject to intermediate scrutiny. It was the first time a federal court had applied quasi-suspect classification in a sexual orientation case. The Supreme Court,
273:
To satisfy the strict scrutiny, suspect classifications such as race, alienage, or national origin must be necessary to promote a compelling state interest when there is no less restrictive alternative method available to accomplish the government (state's) interest.
51:
The United States Supreme Court has mentioned a variety of criteria that, in some combination, may qualify a group as a suspect class, but the Court has not declared that any particular set of criteria are either necessary or sufficient to qualify.
2982: 2226: 38:
discrimination is asserted against a law, regulation, or other government action, or sometimes private action. When a law or government action affects a group that falls under a "suspect classification," courts apply the
2194: 2050: 219: 1112: 1318: 1372: 222:
discussed this type of classification, but applied heightened scrutiny without specifically labeling gays and lesbians a suspect or quasi-suspect class in its decision. Striking down Section 3 of
910: 124: 3006: 1803: 1216: 1898: 720: 3119: 1962: 1104: 233: 146: 2793: 1858: 1184: 2681: 30:
is a class or group of persons meeting a series of criteria suggesting they are likely the subject of discrimination. These classes receive closer scrutiny by courts when an
2341: 2210: 1064: 1978: 1655: 3109: 2857: 2146: 2066: 136: 317:, upholding affirmative action based upon racial diversity, are the only cases in which a racially discriminatory law has been upheld under the strict scrutiny test. 1938: 1232: 1019: 1463: 197:
are generally analyzed with rational basis review unless the topic is education of children, in which case they are analyzed under intermediate scrutiny based on
3014: 2365: 2122: 1970: 1763: 152:
As the law currently stands, neither sexual orientation nor gender identity is considered a federal suspect class, although many states do consider them such.
59:
The group has historically been discriminated against or have been subject to prejudice, hostility, or stigma, perhaps due, at least in part, to stereotypes.
2817: 2729: 1356: 441: 1615: 2841: 2373: 1388: 711: 622: 597: 338: 141: 3114: 2654: 1519: 1120: 987: 379: 186: 374:
must adhere. Hence, a State law that discriminates against citizens because of their race, must be reviewed by the applicable State and inferior
2026: 1200: 1011: 1380: 278: 99: 2218: 2202: 2106: 378:
using the strict scrutiny basis of review. A State may, generally, choose to give its citizens more rights or protections than the minimum
2531: 680: 3124: 3104: 2114: 1224: 297:
origin is almost always unconstitutional, unless it is a compelling, narrowly tailored and temporary piece of legislation dealing with
2930: 2646: 2571: 1835: 367: 560: 2990: 930: 1136: 581: 2809: 1679: 2082: 1559: 1404: 918: 131:
could be considered a suspect class, but on the facts presented Proposition 8 failed even to satisfy the much more deferential
2074: 2785: 2389: 1247: 248:
is applied to all other discriminatory statutes. Rational basis scrutiny currently covers all other discriminatory criteria—
1031: 770: 704: 2873: 2689: 2349: 1787: 1639: 1591: 1332: 947: 504: 375: 88: 69:
They are powerless to protect themselves via the political process. (The group is a "discrete" and "insular" minority.)
2673: 1843: 1144: 995: 473: 458: 383: 277:
The practical result of this legal doctrine is that government sponsored discrimination on the account of a citizen's
2523: 2058: 1795: 520: 307: 177:, 403 U.S. 365 (1971)). As such, state actions are analyzed according to strict scrutiny. In contrast, because the 94: 2186: 2998: 2405: 2397: 2010: 1431: 1364: 163:, or the state of being an alien, i.e. a non-citizen of the United States, is a unique category. For purposes of 3030: 2974: 2138: 1695: 1663: 1088: 1072: 697: 228: 110:
as suspect classes; it therefore analyzes any government action that discriminates against these classes under
1294: 542: 3038: 2905: 2603: 2459: 1720: 1647: 1040: 955: 639:"The End of an Unjust Law: The Second Circuit Strikes Down DOMA and Sets the Stage for Supreme Court Review" 536: 488: 418: 223: 215: 190: 119: 31: 1779: 2269: 2018: 178: 2849: 2499: 1986: 1160: 2958: 2801: 2769: 2357: 1906: 1152: 854: 746: 354: 333: 245: 211: 72:
The group's distinguishing characteristic does not inhibit it from contributing meaningfully to society.
2825: 2737: 2595: 2587: 2483: 2381: 2966: 2130: 2950: 2697: 2563: 2547: 2440: 2245: 2178: 2162: 1954: 1687: 1623: 1503: 1340: 1168: 1128: 1080: 313: 173: 2865: 2475: 2277: 2881: 2833: 2777: 2713: 2705: 2638: 2555: 2515: 2491: 2154: 2098: 2042: 2034: 1671: 1551: 1535: 1412: 1192: 1176: 870: 754: 86:
The Supreme Court established the judicial precedent for suspect classifications in the cases of
2942: 2761: 2753: 2579: 2539: 2424: 2293: 2285: 2253: 2170: 1994: 1946: 1922: 1890: 1811: 1755: 1747: 1599: 1495: 1310: 979: 894: 823: 734: 302: 128: 23: 2507: 638: 3077: 3069: 3022: 2745: 2619: 2333: 2090: 1930: 1914: 1865: 1851: 1827: 1583: 1567: 1527: 1455: 1396: 1096: 1003: 939: 886: 778: 689: 321: 298: 35: 2325: 2301: 1882: 1631: 1607: 1471: 878: 846: 794: 554: 1739: 1479: 1348: 902: 862: 786: 661: 585: 564: 413: 111: 103: 40: 404:
classify sexual orientation as a quasi-suspect class under their respective state laws.
2889: 2721: 2467: 2432: 2309: 1819: 1575: 1487: 1256: 762: 575: 132: 3098: 2611: 2002: 1874: 1543: 1511: 1439: 1302: 1208: 1056: 971: 342: 199: 20: 237:
however, has not decided whether sexual orientation fits into any identified class.
2897: 2261: 1447: 802: 2147:
Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors of America v. Jacksonville
1771: 1048: 963: 835: 397: 294: 194: 182: 168: 260:, wealth, political preference, political affiliation, or criminal conviction. 214:
is applied to groups that fall under a "quasi-suspect classification." Sex and
2317: 393: 387: 371: 257: 164: 63: 2983:
Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank
286: 337:
applies to real, fact-based, or biological differences between the sexes.
290: 160: 107: 2227:
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
2195:
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
2051:
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
43:
standard in reviewing the constitutional validity of a law or action.
525:, 323 U.S., 214 (United States Supreme Court=2010-09-13). 253: 509:, 320 U.S., 81 (United States Supreme Court=2013-09-13). 189:
government action that discriminates based on alienage will receive
1113:
Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists
396:
classifies sexual orientation as a suspect class under state law.
282: 401: 3057: 2928: 1718: 1319:
Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York
821: 732: 693: 1373:
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community
382:
standard when considering state law. For example, in 2008 the
125:
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
386:
used the strict scrutiny basis of review to strike down a
3007:
Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett
911:
O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.
390:
statute denying legal recognition of same-sex marriages.
218:
have been held to be quasi-suspect classes. In 2012, the
1804:
Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma
1217:
Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.
320:
Strict scrutiny is also applied to restrictions of any
1899:
Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
1963:
United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education
1105:
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health
147:
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
2794:
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez
1859:
Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
1185:
Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England
98:, 323 U.S. 214 (1944). The Supreme Court recognizes 2682:
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.
2665: 2630: 2451: 2416: 2237: 1731: 1423: 1243: 1030: 929: 834: 55:Some of the criteria that have been cited include: 2342:Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney 2211:Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action 1065:Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth 1979:Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education 1656:Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 370:holdings impose a minimum standard to which each 2858:City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc. 2067:Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 137:U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska 1939:Green v. County School Board of New Kent County 1464:Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. 3015:Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs 2366:Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County 2123:Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell 1971:Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education 1764:Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education 705: 8: 3120:Anti-discrimination law in the United States 1233:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 1137:Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health 1020:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization 220:U.S. District Court for Northern California 2818:Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia 2730:Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections 1357:Will v. Michigan Department of State Police 435: 433: 3054: 2925: 2083:Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education 1728: 1715: 1616:Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill 831: 818: 729: 712: 698: 690: 611:Golinski v. Office of Personnel Management 2842:New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer 2374:Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan 1389:Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee 660:Souter, David, US Supreme Court Justice. 339:Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan 2075:Washington v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1 577:Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning 556:Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning 142:Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning 127:in its Findings of Fact commented that 3110:United States equal protection case law 2786:Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co. 2655:Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Ward 1520:Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur 1121:Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 988:Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 681:Homosexuality and the Law: A Dictionary 429: 2027:Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver 662:"Vacco v. Quill - 521 U.S. 793 (1997)" 453: 451: 1381:City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams 311:, regarding Japanese internment, and 7: 2107:Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education 1248:Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes 598:Mississippi Univ. for Women v. Hogan 358:close judicial balancing is needed. 324:, regardless of the group involved. 145:, but was reversed on appeal by the 2874:Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public Schools 2690:Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth 2115:City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. 1225:June Medical Services, LLC v. Russo 1201:Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt 1012:Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt 558:, 368 F. Supp. 2d 980 (D.Neb. 2005) 442:Sexual Orientation and Human Rights 2647:Arlington County Board v. Richards 2572:Examining Board v. Flores de Otero 2350:Wengler v. Druggists Mut. Ins. Co. 1836:McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents 721:United States Fourteenth Amendment 627:, 12-2335-cv(L), October 18, 2012. 14: 2991:Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents 2532:Takahashi v. Fish and Game Comm'n 2810:Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas 2219:Fisher v. University of Texas II 1680:Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. 637:Kemp, David (October 22, 2012). 2524:Ohio ex rel. Clark v. Deckebach 2203:Fisher v. University of Texas I 1560:Moore v. City of East Cleveland 1405:Los Angeles County v. Humphries 919:West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish 362:Classifications under state law 3115:Legal doctrines and principles 2390:J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. 613:, C 10-00257 (N.D. Cal. 2012). 579:, 455 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2006) 1: 2059:Dayton Bd. of Ed. v. Brinkman 1264:McNeese v. Board of Education 771:United States v. Wong Kim Ark 1788:Hirabayashi v. United States 1640:DeShaney v. Winnebago County 1592:Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. 1333:Owen v. City of Independence 948:Pierce v. Society of Sisters 505:Hirabayashi v. United States 234:2nd Circuit Court of Appeals 89:Hirabayashi v. United States 2674:United States v. Cruikshank 1844:Brown v. Board of Education 1145:Planned Parenthood v. Casey 996:Planned Parenthood v. Casey 384:Supreme Court of California 3141: 3125:American legal terminology 3105:Civil rights and liberties 1796:Korematsu v. United States 521:Korematsu v. United States 308:Korematsu v. United States 181:has the power to regulate 95:Korematsu v. United States 3064: 3053: 2999:United States v. Morrison 2937: 2924: 2406:United States v. Skrmetti 2398:United States v. Virginia 2011:Guey Heung Lee v. Johnson 1727: 1714: 1432:Jacobson v. Massachusetts 1365:Gonzaga University v. Doe 830: 817: 741: 728: 474:U.S. v. Carolene Products 345:, 121 S.Ct. 2053 (2001). 341:, 102 S.Ct. 3331 (1982), 264:Levels of judicial review 193:. State acts that affect 3031:United States v. Georgia 2975:City of Boerne v. Flores 2139:United States v. Fordice 1696:Williams v. Pennsylvania 1664:Washington v. Glucksberg 624:Windsor v. United States 491:411 U.S. 677, 686 (1973) 229:Windsor v. United States 66:or highly visible trait. 3039:Shelby County v. Holder 2604:Cabell v. Chavez-Salido 2460:Patsone v. Pennsylvania 1721:Equal Protection Clause 1648:Michael H. v. Gerald D. 1041:United States v. Vuitch 956:Griswold v. Connecticut 537:Perry v. Schwarzenegger 489:Frontiero v. Richardson 419:Tyranny of the majority 246:Rational basis scrutiny 226:as unconstitutional in 203:, 457 U.S. 202 (1982). 191:rational basis scrutiny 120:Perry v. Schwarzenegger 2906:Armour v. Indianapolis 2270:Moritz v. Commissioner 1326:Procunier v. Navarette 1244:Civil rights liability 1032:Abortion jurisprudence 601:, 458 U.S. 718 (1982). 179:United States Congress 28:suspect classification 2959:Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer 2802:Richardson v. Ramirez 2770:Boddie v. Connecticut 2358:Kirchberg v. Feenstra 2187:Johnson v. California 1907:McLaughlin v. Florida 1295:O'Connor v. Donaldson 855:Allgeyer v. Louisiana 747:Slaughter-House Cases 355:rational basis review 334:intermediate scrutiny 328:Intermediate scrutiny 212:Intermediate scrutiny 171:are a suspect class ( 2951:Katzenbach v. Morgan 2698:Breedlove v. Suttles 2548:Graham v. Richardson 2441:Obergefell v. Hodges 2246:Breedlove v. Suttles 2179:Grutter v. Bollinger 2019:Jefferson v. Hackney 1688:Obergefell v. Hodges 1624:Edwards v. Aguillard 1504:Epperson v. Arkansas 1341:Harlow v. Fitzgerald 1276:Jenkins v. McKeithen 1169:Mazurek v. Armstrong 1129:Hodgson v. Minnesota 1089:Bellotti v. Baird II 1081:Colautti v. Franklin 836:Economic substantive 314:Grutter v. Bollinger 174:Graham v. Richardson 2882:Gregory v. Ashcroft 2850:Mills v. Habluetzel 2834:Zablocki v. Redhail 2778:Eisenstadt v. Baird 2714:Oyama v. California 2706:Skinner v. Oklahoma 2639:Shapiro v. Thompson 2556:Sugarman v. Dougall 2500:Porterfield v. Webb 2492:Terrace v. Thompson 2155:Missouri v. Jenkins 2099:Hunter v. Underwood 2043:Milliken v. Bradley 2035:Norwood v. Harrison 1987:McDaniel v. Barresi 1672:Troxel v. Granville 1552:Mathews v. Eldridge 1536:Taylor v. Louisiana 1413:Connick v. Thompson 1193:Gonzales v. Carhart 1177:Stenberg v. Carhart 1161:Lambert v. Wicklund 1073:Bellotti v. Baird I 871:Lochner v. New York 755:Minor v. Happersett 439:Wintemute, Robert, 216:legitimacy of birth 207:Quasi-suspect class 195:unlawful immigrants 92:, 320 U.S. 81 and 2943:Civil Rights Cases 2931:Enforcement Clause 2762:Oregon v. Mitchell 2754:Williams v. Rhodes 2580:Nyquist v. Mauclet 2540:Hernandez v. Texas 2425:Bowers v. Hardwick 2417:Sexual orientation 2294:Stanton v. Stanton 2286:Geduldig v. Aiello 2254:Goesaert v. Cleary 2171:Gratz v. Bollinger 1995:Palmer v. Thompson 1947:Hunter v. Erickson 1923:Loving v. Virginia 1891:Anderson v. Martin 1812:Shelley v. Kraemer 1756:Plessy v. Ferguson 1748:Yick Wo v. Hopkins 1600:Kolender v. Lawson 1496:Loving v. Virginia 1311:Imbler v. Pachtman 1288:Wood v. Strickland 1153:Leavitt v. Jane L. 980:Bowers v. Hardwick 895:Buchanan v. Warley 824:Due Process Clause 735:Citizenship Clause 584:2011-12-13 at the 563:2011-07-14 at the 303:affirmative action 129:sexual orientation 24:constitutional law 3092: 3091: 3088: 3087: 3078:Trump v. Anderson 3070:Gold Clause Cases 3049: 3048: 3023:Tennessee v. Lane 2920: 2919: 2916: 2915: 2826:Trimble v. Gordon 2746:Levy v. Louisiana 2738:Rinaldi v. Yeager 2620:Bernal v. Fainter 2596:Ambach v. Norwick 2588:Foley v. Connelie 2484:Crane v. New York 2382:Lehr v. Robertson 2334:Caban v. Mohammed 2091:Palmore v. Sidoti 1931:Lee v. Washington 1915:Reitman v. Mulkey 1866:Gebhart v. Belton 1852:Briggs v. Elliott 1828:Sweatt v. Painter 1710: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1584:Parratt v. Taylor 1568:Duren v. Missouri 1528:Arnett v. Kennedy 1456:Powell v. Alabama 1397:Ashcroft v. Iqbal 1282:Scheuer v. Rhodes 1097:H. L. v. Matheson 1004:Lawrence v. Texas 940:Meyer v. Nebraska 887:Coppage v. Kansas 813: 812: 779:Perez v. Brownell 322:fundamental right 299:national security 139:held the same in 3132: 3055: 2967:Dellmuth v. Muth 2926: 2326:Parham v. Hughes 2302:Edwards v. Healy 2131:Freeman v. Pitts 1886:(M.D. Ala. 1956) 1883:Browder v. Gayle 1729: 1716: 1632:Turner v. Safley 1608:Hudson v. Palmer 1472:NAACP v. Alabama 931:Right to privacy 879:Muller v. Oregon 847:Mugler v. Kansas 832: 819: 795:Rogers v. Bellei 730: 714: 707: 700: 691: 685: 678:Stewart, Chuck, 676: 670: 669: 657: 651: 650: 648: 646: 634: 628: 620: 614: 608: 602: 594: 588: 573: 567: 552: 546: 540: 532: 526: 524: 516: 510: 508: 500: 494: 484: 478: 469: 463: 459:Lyng v. Castillo 455: 446: 437: 62:They possess an 36:unconstitutional 32:Equal Protection 3140: 3139: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3084: 3060: 3045: 2933: 2912: 2661: 2626: 2564:In re Griffiths 2508:Webb v. O'Brien 2447: 2412: 2233: 2163:Texas v. Lesage 1955:Hadnott v. Amos 1740:Pace v. Alabama 1723: 1702: 1480:Hoyt v. Florida 1419: 1349:Felder v. Casey 1245: 1239: 1026: 925: 903:Adams v. Tanner 863:Holden v. Hardy 837: 826: 809: 787:Afroyim v. Rusk 737: 724: 718: 688: 677: 673: 659: 658: 654: 644: 642: 636: 635: 631: 621: 617: 609: 605: 595: 591: 586:Wayback Machine 574: 570: 565:Wayback Machine 553: 549: 534: 533: 529: 518: 517: 513: 502: 501: 497: 485: 481: 470: 466: 456: 449: 438: 431: 427: 414:Protected group 410: 368:Supreme Court's 364: 351: 330: 271: 269:Strict scrutiny 266: 243: 209: 158: 112:strict scrutiny 104:national origin 84: 79: 49: 41:strict scrutiny 34:claim alleging 17: 12: 11: 5: 3138: 3136: 3128: 3127: 3122: 3117: 3112: 3107: 3097: 3096: 3090: 3089: 3086: 3085: 3083: 3082: 3074: 3065: 3062: 3061: 3058: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3046: 3044: 3043: 3035: 3027: 3019: 3011: 3003: 2995: 2987: 2979: 2971: 2963: 2955: 2947: 2938: 2935: 2934: 2929: 2922: 2921: 2918: 2917: 2914: 2913: 2911: 2910: 2902: 2894: 2890:Vacco v. Quill 2886: 2878: 2870: 2866:Clark v. Jeter 2862: 2854: 2846: 2838: 2830: 2822: 2814: 2806: 2798: 2790: 2782: 2774: 2766: 2758: 2750: 2742: 2734: 2726: 2722:Oyler v. Boles 2718: 2710: 2702: 2694: 2686: 2678: 2669: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2660: 2659: 2651: 2643: 2634: 2632: 2628: 2627: 2625: 2624: 2616: 2608: 2600: 2592: 2584: 2576: 2568: 2560: 2552: 2544: 2536: 2528: 2520: 2512: 2504: 2496: 2488: 2480: 2476:Heim v. McCall 2472: 2468:Truax v. Raich 2464: 2455: 2453: 2449: 2448: 2446: 2445: 2437: 2433:Romer v. Evans 2429: 2420: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2411: 2410: 2402: 2394: 2386: 2378: 2370: 2362: 2354: 2346: 2338: 2330: 2322: 2314: 2310:Craig v. Boren 2306: 2298: 2290: 2282: 2278:Kahn v. Shevin 2274: 2266: 2258: 2250: 2241: 2239: 2235: 2234: 2232: 2231: 2223: 2215: 2207: 2199: 2191: 2183: 2175: 2167: 2159: 2151: 2143: 2135: 2127: 2119: 2111: 2103: 2095: 2087: 2079: 2071: 2063: 2055: 2047: 2039: 2031: 2023: 2015: 2007: 1999: 1991: 1983: 1975: 1967: 1959: 1951: 1943: 1935: 1927: 1919: 1911: 1903: 1895: 1887: 1879: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1862: 1855: 1840: 1832: 1824: 1820:Perez v. Sharp 1816: 1808: 1800: 1792: 1784: 1780:Smith v. Texas 1776: 1768: 1760: 1752: 1744: 1735: 1733: 1725: 1724: 1719: 1712: 1711: 1708: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1701: 1700: 1692: 1684: 1676: 1668: 1660: 1652: 1644: 1636: 1628: 1620: 1612: 1604: 1596: 1588: 1580: 1576:Parham v. J.R. 1572: 1564: 1556: 1548: 1540: 1532: 1524: 1516: 1508: 1500: 1492: 1488:Oyler v. Boles 1484: 1476: 1468: 1460: 1452: 1444: 1436: 1427: 1425: 1421: 1420: 1418: 1417: 1409: 1401: 1393: 1385: 1377: 1369: 1361: 1353: 1345: 1337: 1329: 1323: 1315: 1307: 1299: 1291: 1285: 1279: 1273: 1270:Pierson v. Ray 1267: 1261: 1257:Monroe v. Pape 1252: 1250: 1241: 1240: 1238: 1237: 1229: 1221: 1213: 1205: 1197: 1189: 1181: 1173: 1165: 1157: 1149: 1141: 1133: 1125: 1117: 1109: 1101: 1093: 1085: 1077: 1069: 1061: 1053: 1045: 1036: 1034: 1028: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1016: 1008: 1000: 992: 984: 976: 968: 960: 952: 944: 935: 933: 927: 926: 924: 923: 915: 907: 899: 891: 883: 875: 867: 859: 851: 842: 840: 828: 827: 822: 815: 814: 811: 810: 808: 807: 799: 791: 783: 775: 767: 763:Elk v. Wilkins 759: 751: 742: 739: 738: 733: 726: 725: 719: 717: 716: 709: 702: 694: 687: 686: 671: 652: 629: 615: 603: 589: 568: 547: 527: 511: 495: 479: 464: 447: 428: 426: 423: 422: 421: 416: 409: 406: 376:federal courts 363: 360: 350: 349:Rational basis 347: 329: 326: 301:, defense, or 270: 267: 265: 262: 242: 239: 208: 205: 157: 154: 133:rational basis 83: 80: 78: 77:Classification 75: 74: 73: 70: 67: 60: 48: 45: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3137: 3126: 3123: 3121: 3118: 3116: 3113: 3111: 3108: 3106: 3103: 3102: 3100: 3080: 3079: 3075: 3072: 3071: 3067: 3066: 3063: 3056: 3052: 3041: 3040: 3036: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3025: 3024: 3020: 3017: 3016: 3012: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3001: 3000: 2996: 2993: 2992: 2988: 2985: 2984: 2980: 2977: 2976: 2972: 2969: 2968: 2964: 2961: 2960: 2956: 2953: 2952: 2948: 2945: 2944: 2940: 2939: 2936: 2932: 2927: 2923: 2908: 2907: 2903: 2900: 2899: 2895: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2884: 2883: 2879: 2876: 2875: 2871: 2868: 2867: 2863: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2852: 2851: 2847: 2844: 2843: 2839: 2836: 2835: 2831: 2828: 2827: 2823: 2820: 2819: 2815: 2812: 2811: 2807: 2804: 2803: 2799: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2788: 2787: 2783: 2780: 2779: 2775: 2772: 2771: 2767: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2756: 2755: 2751: 2748: 2747: 2743: 2740: 2739: 2735: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2724: 2723: 2719: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2695: 2692: 2691: 2687: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2676: 2675: 2671: 2670: 2668: 2664: 2657: 2656: 2652: 2649: 2648: 2644: 2641: 2640: 2636: 2635: 2633: 2629: 2622: 2621: 2617: 2614: 2613: 2612:Plyler v. Doe 2609: 2606: 2605: 2601: 2598: 2597: 2593: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2582: 2581: 2577: 2574: 2573: 2569: 2566: 2565: 2561: 2558: 2557: 2553: 2550: 2549: 2545: 2542: 2541: 2537: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2526: 2525: 2521: 2518: 2517: 2516:Frick v. Webb 2513: 2510: 2509: 2505: 2502: 2501: 2497: 2494: 2493: 2489: 2486: 2485: 2481: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2470: 2469: 2465: 2462: 2461: 2457: 2456: 2454: 2450: 2443: 2442: 2438: 2435: 2434: 2430: 2427: 2426: 2422: 2421: 2419: 2415: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2395: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2384: 2383: 2379: 2376: 2375: 2371: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2360: 2359: 2355: 2352: 2351: 2347: 2344: 2343: 2339: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2328: 2327: 2323: 2320: 2319: 2315: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2304: 2303: 2299: 2296: 2295: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2283: 2280: 2279: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2267: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2240: 2236: 2229: 2228: 2224: 2221: 2220: 2216: 2213: 2212: 2208: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2197: 2196: 2192: 2189: 2188: 2184: 2181: 2180: 2176: 2173: 2172: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2160: 2157: 2156: 2152: 2149: 2148: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2136: 2133: 2132: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2120: 2117: 2116: 2112: 2109: 2108: 2104: 2101: 2100: 2096: 2093: 2092: 2088: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2069: 2068: 2064: 2061: 2060: 2056: 2053: 2052: 2048: 2045: 2044: 2040: 2037: 2036: 2032: 2029: 2028: 2024: 2021: 2020: 2016: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2005: 2004: 2003:Coit v. Green 2000: 1997: 1996: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1984: 1981: 1980: 1976: 1973: 1972: 1968: 1965: 1964: 1960: 1957: 1956: 1952: 1949: 1948: 1944: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1933: 1932: 1928: 1925: 1924: 1920: 1917: 1916: 1912: 1909: 1908: 1904: 1901: 1900: 1896: 1893: 1892: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1877: 1876: 1875:Lucy v. Adams 1872: 1868: 1867: 1863: 1861: 1860: 1856: 1854: 1853: 1849: 1848: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1833: 1830: 1829: 1825: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1806: 1805: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1793: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1777: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1758: 1757: 1753: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1742: 1741: 1737: 1736: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1717: 1713: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1626: 1625: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1586: 1585: 1581: 1578: 1577: 1573: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1557: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1546: 1545: 1544:Goss v. Lopez 1541: 1538: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1529: 1525: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1512:In re Winship 1509: 1506: 1505: 1501: 1498: 1497: 1493: 1490: 1489: 1485: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1469: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1453: 1450: 1449: 1445: 1442: 1441: 1440:Zucht v. King 1437: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1426: 1422: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1375: 1374: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1316: 1313: 1312: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1303:Paul v. Davis 1300: 1297: 1296: 1292: 1289: 1286: 1283: 1280: 1277: 1274: 1271: 1268: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1251: 1249: 1242: 1235: 1234: 1230: 1227: 1226: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209:Azar v. Garza 1206: 1203: 1202: 1198: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1179: 1178: 1174: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1102: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1078: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1067: 1066: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1057:Doe v. Bolton 1054: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1043: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1009: 1006: 1005: 1001: 998: 997: 993: 990: 989: 985: 982: 981: 977: 974: 973: 972:Doe v. Bolton 969: 966: 965: 961: 958: 957: 953: 950: 949: 945: 942: 941: 937: 936: 934: 932: 928: 921: 920: 916: 913: 912: 908: 905: 904: 900: 897: 896: 892: 889: 888: 884: 881: 880: 876: 873: 872: 868: 865: 864: 860: 857: 856: 852: 849: 848: 844: 843: 841: 839: 833: 829: 825: 820: 816: 805: 804: 800: 797: 796: 792: 789: 788: 784: 781: 780: 776: 773: 772: 768: 765: 764: 760: 757: 756: 752: 749: 748: 744: 743: 740: 736: 731: 727: 722: 715: 710: 708: 703: 701: 696: 695: 692: 683: 682: 675: 672: 667: 663: 656: 653: 640: 633: 630: 626: 625: 619: 616: 612: 607: 604: 600: 599: 593: 590: 587: 583: 580: 578: 572: 569: 566: 562: 559: 557: 551: 548: 544: 539: 538: 531: 528: 523: 522: 515: 512: 507: 506: 499: 496: 492: 490: 483: 480: 476: 475: 468: 465: 461: 460: 454: 452: 448: 444: 443: 436: 434: 430: 424: 420: 417: 415: 412: 411: 407: 405: 403: 399: 395: 391: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 361: 359: 356: 348: 346: 344: 343:Nguyen v. INS 340: 335: 327: 325: 323: 318: 316: 315: 310: 309: 304: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 275: 268: 263: 261: 259: 255: 251: 247: 240: 238: 235: 231: 230: 225: 221: 217: 213: 206: 204: 202: 201: 200:Plyler v. Doe 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 175: 170: 166: 162: 155: 153: 150: 148: 144: 143: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 121: 115: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 96: 91: 90: 82:Suspect class 81: 76: 71: 68: 65: 61: 58: 57: 56: 53: 46: 44: 42: 37: 33: 29: 25: 22: 21:United States 16:US legal term 3076: 3068: 3037: 3029: 3021: 3013: 3005: 2997: 2989: 2981: 2973: 2965: 2957: 2949: 2941: 2904: 2898:Bush v. Gore 2896: 2888: 2880: 2872: 2864: 2856: 2848: 2840: 2832: 2824: 2816: 2808: 2800: 2792: 2784: 2776: 2768: 2760: 2752: 2744: 2736: 2728: 2720: 2712: 2704: 2696: 2688: 2680: 2672: 2653: 2645: 2637: 2618: 2610: 2602: 2594: 2586: 2578: 2570: 2562: 2554: 2546: 2538: 2530: 2522: 2514: 2506: 2498: 2490: 2482: 2474: 2466: 2458: 2439: 2431: 2423: 2404: 2396: 2388: 2380: 2372: 2364: 2356: 2348: 2340: 2332: 2324: 2316: 2308: 2300: 2292: 2284: 2276: 2268: 2262:Reed v. Reed 2260: 2252: 2244: 2225: 2217: 2209: 2201: 2193: 2185: 2177: 2169: 2161: 2153: 2145: 2137: 2129: 2121: 2113: 2105: 2097: 2089: 2081: 2073: 2065: 2057: 2049: 2041: 2033: 2025: 2017: 2009: 2001: 1993: 1985: 1977: 1969: 1961: 1953: 1945: 1937: 1929: 1921: 1913: 1905: 1897: 1889: 1881: 1873: 1864: 1857: 1850: 1842: 1834: 1826: 1818: 1810: 1802: 1794: 1786: 1778: 1770: 1762: 1754: 1746: 1738: 1694: 1686: 1678: 1670: 1662: 1654: 1646: 1638: 1630: 1622: 1614: 1606: 1598: 1590: 1582: 1574: 1566: 1558: 1550: 1542: 1534: 1526: 1518: 1510: 1502: 1494: 1486: 1478: 1470: 1462: 1454: 1448:Buck v. Bell 1446: 1438: 1430: 1411: 1403: 1395: 1387: 1379: 1371: 1363: 1355: 1347: 1339: 1331: 1325: 1317: 1309: 1301: 1293: 1287: 1281: 1275: 1269: 1263: 1255: 1231: 1223: 1215: 1207: 1199: 1191: 1183: 1175: 1167: 1159: 1151: 1143: 1135: 1127: 1119: 1111: 1103: 1095: 1087: 1079: 1071: 1063: 1055: 1047: 1039: 1018: 1010: 1002: 994: 986: 978: 970: 962: 954: 946: 938: 917: 909: 901: 893: 885: 877: 869: 861: 853: 845: 803:Saenz v. Roe 801: 793: 785: 777: 769: 761: 753: 745: 679: 674: 665: 655: 643:. Retrieved 632: 623: 618: 610: 606: 596: 592: 576: 571: 555: 550: 535: 530: 519: 514: 503: 498: 487: 482: 472: 467: 457: 440: 392: 365: 352: 331: 319: 312: 306: 276: 272: 249: 244: 232:(2012), the 227: 210: 198: 172: 169:legal aliens 159: 151: 140: 135:review. The 118: 116: 93: 87: 85: 54: 50: 27: 18: 1823:(Cal. 1948) 1772:Lum v. Rice 1049:Roe v. Wade 964:Roe v. Wade 838:due process 645:October 27, 398:Connecticut 183:immigration 3099:Categories 2318:Orr v. Orr 666:Justia.com 425:References 394:California 388:California 258:disability 241:All others 2631:Residency 287:ethnicity 64:immutable 2452:Alienage 723:case law 641:. Justia 582:Archived 561:Archived 408:See also 295:national 291:religion 161:Alienage 156:Alienage 108:religion 47:Criteria 1847:(1954) 380:federal 281:, skin 187:federal 3081:(2024) 3073:(1935) 3042:(2013) 3034:(2006) 3026:(2004) 3018:(2003) 3010:(2001) 3002:(2000) 2994:(2000) 2986:(1999) 2978:(1997) 2970:(1989) 2962:(1976) 2954:(1966) 2946:(1883) 2909:(2012) 2901:(2000) 2893:(1997) 2885:(1991) 2877:(1988) 2869:(1988) 2861:(1985) 2853:(1982) 2845:(1979) 2837:(1978) 2829:(1977) 2821:(1976) 2813:(1974) 2805:(1974) 2797:(1973) 2789:(1973) 2781:(1972) 2773:(1971) 2765:(1970) 2757:(1968) 2749:(1968) 2741:(1966) 2733:(1966) 2725:(1962) 2717:(1948) 2709:(1942) 2701:(1937) 2693:(1928) 2685:(1886) 2677:(1876) 2658:(1985) 2650:(1977) 2642:(1969) 2623:(1984) 2615:(1982) 2607:(1982) 2599:(1979) 2591:(1978) 2583:(1977) 2575:(1976) 2567:(1973) 2559:(1973) 2551:(1971) 2543:(1954) 2535:(1948) 2527:(1927) 2519:(1923) 2511:(1923) 2503:(1923) 2495:(1923) 2487:(1915) 2479:(1915) 2471:(1915) 2463:(1914) 2444:(2015) 2436:(1996) 2428:(1986) 2409:(2024) 2401:(1996) 2393:(1994) 2385:(1983) 2377:(1982) 2369:(1981) 2361:(1981) 2353:(1980) 2345:(1979) 2337:(1979) 2329:(1979) 2321:(1979) 2313:(1976) 2305:(1975) 2297:(1975) 2289:(1974) 2281:(1974) 2273:(1972) 2265:(1971) 2257:(1948) 2249:(1937) 2230:(2023) 2222:(2016) 2214:(2014) 2206:(2013) 2198:(2007) 2190:(2005) 2182:(2003) 2174:(2003) 2166:(1999) 2158:(1995) 2150:(1993) 2142:(1992) 2134:(1992) 2126:(1991) 2118:(1989) 2110:(1986) 2102:(1985) 2094:(1984) 2086:(1982) 2078:(1982) 2070:(1978) 2062:(1977) 2054:(1977) 2046:(1974) 2038:(1973) 2030:(1973) 2022:(1972) 2014:(1971) 2006:(1971) 1998:(1971) 1990:(1971) 1982:(1971) 1974:(1969) 1966:(1969) 1958:(1969) 1950:(1969) 1942:(1968) 1934:(1968) 1926:(1967) 1918:(1967) 1910:(1964) 1902:(1964) 1894:(1964) 1878:(1955) 1839:(1950) 1831:(1950) 1815:(1948) 1807:(1948) 1799:(1944) 1791:(1943) 1783:(1940) 1775:(1927) 1767:(1899) 1759:(1896) 1751:(1886) 1743:(1883) 1699:(2016) 1691:(2015) 1683:(2009) 1675:(2000) 1667:(1997) 1659:(1990) 1651:(1989) 1643:(1989) 1635:(1987) 1627:(1987) 1619:(1985) 1611:(1984) 1603:(1983) 1595:(1982) 1587:(1981) 1579:(1979) 1571:(1979) 1563:(1977) 1555:(1976) 1547:(1975) 1539:(1975) 1531:(1974) 1523:(1974) 1515:(1971) 1507:(1968) 1499:(1967) 1491:(1962) 1483:(1961) 1475:(1958) 1467:(1950) 1459:(1932) 1451:(1927) 1443:(1922) 1435:(1905) 1416:(2011) 1408:(2010) 1400:(2009) 1392:(2009) 1384:(2005) 1376:(2003) 1368:(2002) 1360:(1989) 1352:(1988) 1344:(1982) 1336:(1980) 1328:(1978) 1322:(1978) 1314:(1976) 1306:(1976) 1298:(1975) 1290:(1975) 1284:(1974) 1278:(1969) 1272:(1967) 1266:(1963) 1260:(1961) 1246:under 1236:(2022) 1228:(2020) 1220:(2019) 1212:(2018) 1204:(2016) 1196:(2007) 1188:(2006) 1180:(2000) 1172:(1997) 1164:(1997) 1156:(1996) 1148:(1992) 1140:(1990) 1132:(1990) 1124:(1989) 1116:(1986) 1108:(1983) 1100:(1981) 1092:(1979) 1084:(1979) 1076:(1976) 1068:(1976) 1060:(1973) 1052:(1973) 1044:(1971) 1023:(2022) 1015:(2016) 1007:(2003) 999:(1992) 991:(1989) 983:(1986) 975:(1973) 967:(1973) 959:(1965) 951:(1925) 943:(1923) 922:(1937) 914:(1931) 906:(1917) 898:(1917) 890:(1915) 882:(1908) 874:(1905) 866:(1898) 858:(1897) 850:(1887) 806:(1999) 798:(1971) 790:(1967) 782:(1958) 774:(1898) 766:(1884) 758:(1875) 750:(1873) 684:(2001) 462:(1986) 445:(1995) 123:, the 106:, and 3059:Other 2666:Other 1424:Other 486:See: 471:See: 372:State 353:When 332:When 293:, or 283:color 167:law, 165:state 1732:Race 647:2012 543:Text 402:Iowa 400:and 366:The 279:race 250:e.g. 224:DOMA 100:race 26:, a 2238:Sex 254:age 117:In 19:In 3101:: 664:. 450:^ 432:^ 305:. 289:, 285:, 256:, 252:, 185:, 149:. 114:. 102:, 713:e 706:t 699:v 668:. 649:. 545:. 493:. 477:.

Index

United States
constitutional law
Equal Protection
unconstitutional
strict scrutiny
immutable
Hirabayashi v. United States
Korematsu v. United States
race
national origin
religion
strict scrutiny
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
sexual orientation
rational basis
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska
Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Alienage
state
legal aliens
Graham v. Richardson
United States Congress
immigration
federal
rational basis scrutiny
unlawful immigrants
Plyler v. Doe
Intermediate scrutiny

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.