Knowledge (XXG)

S v Chabedi

Source 📝

106: 73:
In view of the findings made regarding the competency of the attorney who conducted his defence at the trial, the interests of justice required that another legal representative be appointed to represent the appellant at the further trial.
47:
The court held that it was the duty of the attorney, in the proper performance of his mandate to defend the appellant, to have recalled the witnesses in order to do justice to his client's defense.
166: 147: 59:
The court held that the attorney clearly failed to appreciate the import of the evidence and the effect it might have had on the complainant's version and other evidence.
56:
The court held the right of an accused person to be properly defended is inextricably linked to the accused's rights to a fair trial and to legal representation.
53:
Accepting that the appellant had not been defended properly, the question was whether it had amounted to a fatal irregularity which vitiated the proceedings.
171: 140: 176: 133: 84: 63: 50:
The attorney's failure to do so brought into question his competency to conduct the appellant's defense.
41: 113: 29:
had allegedly failed to consult properly with Chabedi, and had failed to recall certain state
117: 33:, when it became apparent that they could answer questions relating to material issues. 160: 105: 90: 67: 40:, the court raised the question of whether the appellant had received a 30: 37: 26: 121: 62:
Therefore the conviction was set aside and the matter
167:Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa cases 141: 8: 148: 134: 91:Annual Survey of South African Law 2004 7: 102: 100: 25:, during a criminal trial Chabedi's 120:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 104: 172:2005 in South African case law 1: 177:South African case law stubs 193: 99: 112:This article relating to 114:case law in South Africa 16:South African legal case 83:S v Chabedi 2004 (1) 129: 128: 184: 150: 143: 136: 108: 101: 192: 191: 187: 186: 185: 183: 182: 181: 157: 156: 155: 154: 97: 80: 17: 12: 11: 5: 190: 188: 180: 179: 174: 169: 159: 158: 153: 152: 145: 138: 130: 127: 126: 109: 95: 94: 88: 79: 76: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 189: 178: 175: 173: 170: 168: 165: 164: 162: 151: 146: 144: 139: 137: 132: 131: 125: 123: 119: 115: 110: 107: 103: 98: 92: 89: 86: 82: 81: 77: 75: 71: 69: 65: 60: 57: 54: 51: 48: 45: 43: 39: 34: 32: 28: 24: 23: 122:expanding it 111: 96: 72: 61: 58: 55: 52: 49: 46: 35: 21: 20: 18: 66:to another 22:S v Chabedi 161:Categories 68:magistrate 42:fair trial 31:witnesses 64:remitted 27:attorney 93:, p 693 87:477 (W) 38:appeal 116:is a 78:Notes 118:stub 85:SACR 36:On 19:In 163:: 70:. 44:. 149:e 142:t 135:v 124:.

Index

attorney
witnesses
appeal
fair trial
remitted
magistrate
SACR
Annual Survey of South African Law 2004
Stub icon
case law in South Africa
stub
expanding it
v
t
e
Categories
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa cases
2005 in South African case law
South African case law stubs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.