209:
135:
criminal law, dealing with the defence of compulsion. The accused, in custody, was threatened by a warder with solitary confinement unless he committed a criminal act. The court considered what State must prove in such circumstances in order to obtain a conviction.
139:
The court held that, where an accused's defence is one of compulsion, the onus lies on the State to show that a reasonable man would have resisted the compulsion. There is no onus on the accused to satisfy the court that he acted under compulsion.
147:, then, held the court, at the very least the State must show that the accused could reasonably have complained to the prison authorities of the warder's wrongful conduct and that such complaint would have averted the threatened confinement.
250:
243:
284:
279:
269:
236:
156:
274:
81:
144:
216:
220:
263:
132:
208:
143:
Specifically, where a person is in custody and is threatened by a warder with
224:
120:
Criminal law, Liability, Defence of compulsion, Onus
114:
106:
101:
93:
88:
76:
61:
46:
36:
28:
23:
244:
8:
251:
237:
20:
186:
7:
205:
203:
223:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by
14:
207:
1:
285:South African case law stubs
280:Eastern Cape Division cases
301:
202:
157:South African criminal law
270:1963 in South African law
215:This article relating to
119:
217:case law in South Africa
131:is an important case in
16:South African legal case
97:Smalberger J, Stewart J
65:24 March 1977
50:24 March 1977
32:Eastern Cape Division
193:1977 (3) SA 628 (E).
176:1977 (3) SA 628 (E).
145:solitary confinement
232:
231:
124:
123:
292:
275:1963 in case law
253:
246:
239:
211:
204:
194:
191:
89:Court membership
72:
70:
57:
55:
21:
300:
299:
295:
294:
293:
291:
290:
289:
260:
259:
258:
257:
200:
198:
197:
192:
188:
183:
170:
165:
153:
68:
66:
53:
51:
17:
12:
11:
5:
298:
296:
288:
287:
282:
277:
272:
262:
261:
256:
255:
248:
241:
233:
230:
229:
212:
196:
195:
185:
184:
182:
179:
178:
177:
169:
166:
164:
161:
160:
159:
152:
149:
122:
121:
117:
116:
112:
111:
108:
104:
103:
99:
98:
95:
94:Judges sitting
91:
90:
86:
85:
78:
74:
73:
63:
59:
58:
48:
44:
43:
38:
37:Full case name
34:
33:
30:
26:
25:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
297:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
273:
271:
268:
267:
265:
254:
249:
247:
242:
240:
235:
234:
228:
226:
222:
218:
213:
210:
206:
201:
190:
187:
180:
175:
172:
171:
167:
162:
158:
155:
154:
150:
148:
146:
141:
137:
134:
133:South African
130:
129:
118:
113:
109:
105:
102:Case opinions
100:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
64:
60:
49:
45:
42:
39:
35:
31:
27:
22:
19:
225:expanding it
214:
199:
189:
173:
142:
138:
127:
126:
125:
41:S v Mtewtwa
40:
18:
174:S v Mtewtwa
128:S v Mtewtwa
107:Decision by
24:S v Mtewtwa
264:Categories
163:References
69:1977-03-24
54:1977-03-24
110:Stewart J
80:1977 (3)
168:Case law
151:See also
115:Keywords
77:Citation
84:628 (E)
67: (
62:Decided
52: (
47:Argued
219:is a
181:Notes
29:Court
221:stub
266::
82:SA
252:e
245:t
238:v
227:.
71:)
56:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
