Knowledge (XXG)

Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board

Source đź“ť

42: 226:
for a fifteen-year period and was injured twice while working. In 1992, due to his injuries, Salinas began the process of seeking disability benefits provided under the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974. His application was denied three times, the final denial occurring in 2006. Salinas was granted
230:
This reconsideration was denied. In response, Salinas appealed, arguing that the final denied application should be reopened, as the Railroad Retirement Board had not been given access to pertinent medical records in 2006. A Board hearing officer determined that the 2006 application could not be
231:
reopened as the Board’s standard four-year window for reopening had closed. After this determination, Salinas asked the U.S. Court of Appeals to review the decision. The Fifth Circuit dismissed Salinas’ petition, citing lack of jurisdiction.
213:
case in which the court held that the United States Railroad Retirement Board choice to refuse to reopen the prior, adverse benefits determination of a former railroad worker was subject to judicial review.
401: 239:
In a 5–4 ruling, The Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's decision. The Supreme Court held that the Board's choice not to reopen the prior benefits review was subject to judicial review.
349: 90: 227:
benefits after a fourth application in 2013. After the board granted Salinas benefits, he appealed for reconsideration of the "amount and start date" of the benefits.
406: 396: 46: 266: 210: 316: 196: 223: 74: 353: 85: 17: 378: 161: 360: 153: 137: 117: 125: 390: 149: 129: 109: 141: 369: 291: 41: 267:"Supreme Court Decides Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board" 402:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
178:
Sotomayor, joined by Roberts, Breyer, Kagan, Kavanaugh
265:
Ko, Elliot T.; Taticchi, Mark D. (February 3, 2021).
317:"Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board" 292:"Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board" 190: 182: 174: 169: 98: 80: 70: 60: 53: 34: 8: 222:Manfredo M. Salinas was an employee of the 31: 186:Thomas, joined by Alito, Gorsuch, Barrett 248: 260: 258: 256: 254: 252: 29:2021 United States Supreme Court case 7: 346:Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board 206:Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board 65:Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board 35:Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board 47:Supreme Court of the United States 25: 18:Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Bd. 407:United States Supreme Court cases 356:___ (2021) is available from: 40: 397:2021 in United States case law 1: 209:, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a 379:Supreme Court (slip opinion) 218:Facts and procedural history 211:United States Supreme Court 423: 370:Oyez (oral argument audio) 195: 103: 39: 56:Decided February 3, 2021 271:The National Law Review 197:Railroad Retirement Act 54:Argued November 2, 2020 224:Union Pacific Railroad 114:Associate Justices 202: 201: 162:Amy Coney Barrett 16:(Redirected from 414: 383: 377: 374: 368: 365: 359: 332: 331: 329: 327: 313: 307: 306: 304: 302: 288: 282: 281: 279: 277: 262: 99:Court membership 44: 43: 32: 21: 422: 421: 417: 416: 415: 413: 412: 411: 387: 386: 381: 375: 372: 366: 363: 357: 341: 336: 335: 325: 323: 315: 314: 310: 300: 298: 290: 289: 285: 275: 273: 264: 263: 250: 245: 237: 220: 154:Brett Kavanaugh 152: 140: 138:Sonia Sotomayor 128: 118:Clarence Thomas 55: 49: 30: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 420: 418: 410: 409: 404: 399: 389: 388: 385: 384: 340: 339:External links 337: 334: 333: 308: 283: 247: 246: 244: 241: 236: 233: 219: 216: 200: 199: 193: 192: 188: 187: 184: 180: 179: 176: 172: 171: 167: 166: 165: 164: 126:Stephen Breyer 115: 112: 107: 101: 100: 96: 95: 82: 78: 77: 72: 68: 67: 62: 61:Full case name 58: 57: 51: 50: 45: 37: 36: 28: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 419: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 394: 392: 380: 371: 362: 355: 351: 347: 343: 342: 338: 322: 318: 312: 309: 297: 293: 287: 284: 272: 268: 261: 259: 257: 255: 253: 249: 242: 240: 235:Supreme Court 234: 232: 228: 225: 217: 215: 212: 208: 207: 198: 194: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 170:Case opinions 168: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 123: 119: 116: 113: 111: 108: 106:Chief Justice 105: 104: 102: 97: 93: 92: 87: 83: 79: 76: 73: 69: 66: 63: 59: 52: 48: 38: 33: 27: 19: 345: 324:. Retrieved 320: 311: 299:. Retrieved 295: 286: 274:. Retrieved 270: 238: 229: 221: 205: 204: 203: 191:Laws applied 157: 150:Neil Gorsuch 145: 133: 130:Samuel Alito 121: 110:John Roberts 89: 64: 26: 326:October 18, 321:Ballotpedia 301:October 18, 276:October 18, 142:Elena Kagan 391:Categories 243:References 71:Docket no. 81:Citations 344:Text of 175:Majority 183:Dissent 382:  376:  373:  367:  364:  361:Justia 358:  160: 158:· 156:  148: 146:· 144:  136: 134:· 132:  124: 122:· 120:  75:19-199 352: 88:___ ( 354:U.S. 328:2021 303:2021 296:Oyez 278:2021 91:more 86:U.S. 84:592 350:592 393:: 348:, 319:. 294:. 269:. 251:^ 330:. 305:. 280:. 94:) 20:)

Index

Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Bd.
Supreme Court of the United States
19-199
U.S.
more
John Roberts
Clarence Thomas
Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett
Railroad Retirement Act
United States Supreme Court
Union Pacific Railroad





"Supreme Court Decides Salinas v. Railroad Retirement Board"
"Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board"
"Salinas v. United States Railroad Retirement Board"
592
U.S.
Justia
Oyez (oral argument audio)
Supreme Court (slip opinion)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑