Knowledge (XXG)

Objectivity (science)

Source đź“ť

368:
trick." She demands a re-thinking of objectivity in such a way that, while still striving for "faithful accounts of the real world," we must also acknowledge our perspective within the world. She calls this new kind of knowledge-making "situated knowledges." Objectivity, she argues, "turns out to be about particular and specific embodiment and ... not about the false vision promising transcendence of all limits and responsibility". This new objectivity, "allows us to become answerable for what we learn how to see."
38: 167:'Let nature speak for itself' became the watchword of a new brand of scientific objectivity." It was at this time that idealized representations of nature, which were previously seen as a virtue, were now seen as a vice. Scientists began to see it as their duty to actively restrain themselves from imposing their own projections onto nature. The aim was to liberate representations of nature from subjective, human interference and in order to achieve this 324:
variations to the theory and sympathetic interpretation of the data, supporting scientists will resolve the apparent conundrum. In extreme cases, they may ignore the data altogether. Thus, the failure of a scientific paradigm will go into crisis when a significant portion of scientists working in the
155:
and scientific atlas-makers, and involved active attempts to eliminate any idiosyncrasies in their representations of nature in order to create images thought best to represent "what truly is". Judgment and skill were deemed necessary in order to determine the "typical", "characteristic", "ideal", or
178:
supplemented mechanical objectivity as scientists began to recognize that, in order for images or data to be of any use, scientists needed to be able to see scientifically; that is, to interpret images or data and identify and group them according to particular professional training, rather than to
367:
argues that objectivity in science and philosophy is traditionally understood as a kind of disembodied and transcendent "conquering gaze from nowhere." She argues that this kind of objectivity, in which the subject is split apart and distanced from the object, is an impossible "illusion, a god
359: 248:, but it is unknown how much fraud goes undiscovered. For important results, other groups will try to repeat the experiment. If they consistently fail, they will bring these negative results into the scientific debate. 296:
raised some philosophical objections to claims of the possibility of scientific understanding being truly objective. In Kuhn's analysis, scientists in different disciplines organise themselves into
320:'s philosophical theory of falsificationism would have them do. Instead they have gone to considerable lengths to resolve the apparent conflict without rejecting the paradigm. Through 242:
Next to unintentional and systematic error, there is always the possibility of deliberate misrepresentation of scientific results, whether for gain, fame, or ideological motives.
558: 179:
simply depict them mechanically. Since the latter half of the nineteenth century, objectivity has come to involve a combination of trained judgment and mechanical objectivity.
325:
field lose confidence in it. The corollary of this observation is that a paradigm is contingent on the social order amongst scientists at the time it gains ascendancy.
238:, and other meetings where scientific results are presented, are part of a social process whose purpose is to strengthen the objective aspect of the scientific method. 1272: 108: 646: 1593: 1369: 288: 207:
trials. However, objectivity in measurement can be unobtainable in certain circumstances. Even the most quantitative social sciences such as
865: 498: 156:"average". In practicing, truth-to-nature naturalists did not seek to depict exactly what was seen; rather, they sought a reasoned image. 816: 567: 1553: 1537: 1393: 538: 508: 425: 1545: 933: 1791: 1409: 622: 415: 1617: 953: 1401: 1287: 999: 28: 1601: 1433: 1250: 267: 92:
of the world. Such demonstrable knowledge has ordinarily conferred demonstrable powers of prediction or technology.
1561: 1457: 1441: 1425: 1225: 305:
within which scientific research is done, junior scientists are educated, and scientific problems are determined.
1641: 1193: 1178: 1730: 1577: 1294: 1188: 1183: 858: 740: 377: 96: 807: 84:. To be considered objective, the results of measurement must be communicated from person to person, and then 1704: 1417: 1220: 1198: 943: 766: 1128: 1094: 1625: 1245: 1134: 685: 235: 224: 37: 717: 530:
History of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology: With an Epilogue on Psychiatry and the Mind-Body Relation
1633: 1304: 1267: 1168: 1163: 1099: 958: 609:
Sokal, Alan; Bricmont, Jean (1999). "Intermezzo: Epistemic Relativism in The Philosophy of Science".
159:
In the latter half of the nineteenth-century, objectivity in science was born when a new practice of
132: 116: 104: 143:
and his followers, and continued into later eras. In the early eighteenth century, there existed an
1772: 1609: 1057: 1040: 994: 984: 851: 821: 313: 112: 1694: 1684: 1485: 1361: 1235: 1156: 1120: 928: 677: 669: 479: 647:"Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective" 171:
began using self-registering instruments, cameras, wax molds, and other technological devices.
27:
This article is about the concept of objectivity as it is used in science. For other uses, see
1659: 1500: 1475: 1351: 825: 781: 618: 614: 534: 504: 421: 360:
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
128: 89: 73: 528: 1664: 1585: 1569: 1495: 1449: 1014: 923: 661: 471: 286:
Based on a historical review of the development of certain scientific theories in his book,
245: 115:, but it was later refined and extended—and philosophically superseded—by the more general 1679: 1674: 1255: 1210: 1045: 1019: 963: 811: 747: 712: 595: 591: 329: 200: 152: 81: 1341: 1282: 1115: 1050: 1035: 938: 309: 272: 262: 188: 17: 1785: 1520: 1515: 1490: 1299: 1240: 1151: 1079: 1009: 1004: 761: 364: 196: 192: 136: 681: 460: 316:, scientists within that paradigm historically have not immediately rejected it, as 1375: 1173: 1104: 1064: 892: 735: 212: 204: 144: 140: 100: 1699: 1689: 1669: 1089: 1069: 979: 902: 725: 431: 317: 293: 244:
When such cases of scientific fraud come to light, they usually give rise to an
231: 77: 69: 784:(2001). Objectivity, History of. IN: Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (eds.) 211:
employ measures that are constructs (conventions, to employ the term coined by
1510: 1505: 1480: 1260: 1084: 948: 897: 874: 757: 337: 333: 258: 168: 829: 1751: 1737: 1725: 1709: 1277: 1215: 1074: 907: 352: 208: 187:
Another methodological aspect is the avoidance of bias, which can involve
989: 302: 65: 53: 793:
Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life
673: 483: 45: 1735: 1205: 321: 665: 475: 1744: 36: 786:
International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences
611:
Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science
61: 57: 1321: 847: 800:
Science, Society, and Values: Toward a Sociology of Objectivity
60:, emotions, and false beliefs, while focusing mainly on proven 308:
When observational data arises which appears to contradict or
843: 409: 407: 405: 403: 401: 399: 397: 395: 393: 199:. Methods for avoiding or overcoming such biases include 328:
Kuhn's theory has been criticised by scientists such as
522: 520: 278: 752:
Personal knowledge, towards a post-critical philosophy
640: 638: 636: 634: 1718: 1652: 1529: 1468: 1385: 1332: 1144: 1113: 1028: 972: 916: 885: 257:A critical argument on scientific objectivity and 111:appears to be the norm for the attraction between 806:Reiss, Julian; Sprenger, Jan (6 November 2017) . 566:, The University of Chicago Press, archived from 454: 452: 450: 448: 459:Daston, Lorraine; Galison, Peter (Autumn 1992). 1370:Fourth Great Debate in international relations 76:. It is thus intimately related to the aim of 859: 732:. University of Chicago Press, 3rd Ed., 1996. 139:, rose to popularity with the discoveries of 8: 1749: 1359: 1349: 1339: 1055: 744:. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. 275:presented was centered in such recognition. 151:. This ideal was practiced by Enlightenment 769:: Postmodern philosophers' abuse of science 297: 107:of a hypothesis to the whole. For example, 1329: 1318: 882: 866: 852: 844: 1273:Relationship between religion and science 533:. Springer Science & Business Media. 414:Daston, Lorraine; Galison, Peter (2010). 147:virtue in science which has been called 52:refers to attempts to do higher quality 1594:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 730:The structure of scientific revolutions 560:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 389: 289:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 281:The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 949:Machian positivism (empirio-criticism) 552: 550: 527:Gach, John; Wallace, Edwin R. (2010). 230:Various scientific processes, such as 88:for third parties, as an advance in a 500:The Essential Guide to Doing Research 109:Newton's law of universal gravitation 7: 261:is that all science has a degree of 219:The role of the scientific community 817:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 353:Knowledge § Situated knowledge 343: 253:Critiques of scientific objectivity 1226:Nomothetic–idiographic distinction 25: 1554:The Logic of Scientific Discovery 1538:Materialism and Empirio-criticism 1394:The Course in Positive Philosophy 788:. Oxford. (pp. 10785–10789). 265:. In the 1920s, Percy Bridgman's 34:Type of attempt to uncover truths 824:: The Metaphysics Research Lab. 1546:History and Class Consciousness 103:, sometimes exacerbated by the 1410:Critical History of Philosophy 645:Haraway, Donna (Autumn 1988). 1: 1618:Knowledge and Human Interests 954:Rankean historical positivism 795:. Princeton University Press. 340:view of scientific progress. 1736: 1402:A General View of Positivism 791:Porter, Theodore M. (1995). 497:O'Leary, Zina (2004-06-09). 99:is contrasted with personal 29:Objectivity (disambiguation) 1602:Conjectures and Refutations 1434:The Logic of Modern Physics 1251:Deductive-nomological model 268:The Logic of Modern Physics 1808: 1562:The Poverty of Historicism 1458:The Universe in a Nutshell 1442:Language, Truth, and Logic 1426:The Analysis of Sensations 802:. Lehigh University Press. 461:"The Image of Objectivity" 350: 292:, scientist and historian 222: 183:Objectivity in measurement 26: 1770: 1642:The Rhetoric of Economics 1328: 1323:Positivist-related debate 1317: 881: 174:In the twentieth century 97:philosophical objectivity 1578:Two Dogmas of Empiricism 1295:Structural functionalism 1221:Naturalism in literature 820:(Winter 2017 ed.). 808:"Scientific Objectivity" 771:. London: Profile Books. 557:Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962), 378:Objectivity (philosophy) 90:collective understanding 68:. It is often linked to 56:by eliminating personal 1705:Willard Van Orman Quine 1418:Idealism and Positivism 1010:Critique of metaphysics 944:Sociological positivism 767:Intellectual Impostures 1750: 1719:Concepts in contention 1360: 1350: 1340: 1231:Objectivity in science 1129:Non-Euclidean geometry 1095:Methodological dualism 1056: 798:Restivo, Sal. (20XX). 298: 236:scientific conferences 161:mechanical objectivity 41: 18:Scientific objectivity 1792:Philosophy of science 1626:The Poverty of Theory 1246:Philosophy of science 1135:Uncertainty principle 503:. SAGE Publications. 351:Further information: 234:, the discussions at 225:Scientific misconduct 40: 1634:The Scientific Image 1305:Structuration theory 1268:Qualitative research 1169:Criticism of science 1164:Critical rationalism 1100:Problem of induction 754:. London: Routledge. 117:theory of relativity 1610:One-Dimensional Man 1058:Geisteswissenschaft 1041:Confirmation holism 822:Stanford University 346:Situated Knowledges 314:scientific paradigm 1685:Hans-Georg Gadamer 1486:Alexander Bogdanov 1362:Positivismusstreit 1157:Post-behavioralism 1121:history of science 973:Principal concepts 929:Logical positivism 718:A Devil's Chaplain 573:on 20 October 2014 131:was argued for by 105:overgeneralization 42: 1779: 1778: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1761: 1660:Theodor W. Adorno 1476:Richard Avenarius 1352:Werturteilsstreit 1313: 1312: 1261:Sense-data theory 959:Polish positivism 934:Positivist school 741:Science in Action 720:: Selected essays 596:"Hall Of Mirrors" 129:scientific method 74:scientific method 16:(Redirected from 1799: 1755: 1741: 1665:Gaston Bachelard 1586:Truth and Method 1570:World Hypotheses 1450:The Two Cultures 1365: 1355: 1345: 1330: 1319: 1061: 1015:Unity of science 924:Legal positivism 883: 868: 861: 854: 845: 840: 838: 836: 812:Zalta, Edward N. 748:Polanyi, Michael 713:Dawkins, Richard 700: 699: 697: 696: 690: 684:. Archived from 654:Feminist Studies 651: 642: 629: 628: 606: 600: 599: 592:Dawkins, Richard 588: 582: 581: 580: 578: 572: 565: 554: 545: 544: 524: 515: 514: 494: 488: 487: 465: 456: 443: 442: 440: 439: 430:. Archived from 411: 344:Donna Haraway's 336:as presenting a 301: 249: 246:academic scandal 239: 176:trained judgment 166: 113:celestial bodies 21: 1807: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1775: 1758: 1714: 1680:Paul Feyerabend 1675:Wilhelm Dilthey 1648: 1525: 1464: 1381: 1324: 1309: 1256:Ramsey sentence 1211:Instrumentalism 1140: 1118: 1116:paradigm shifts 1109: 1046:Critical theory 1024: 1020:Verificationism 968: 964:Russian Machism 912: 877: 872: 834: 832: 805: 778: 776:Further reading 709: 704: 703: 694: 692: 688: 666:10.2307/3178066 649: 644: 643: 632: 625: 608: 607: 603: 590: 589: 585: 576: 574: 570: 563: 556: 555: 548: 541: 526: 525: 518: 511: 496: 495: 491: 476:10.2307/2928741 468:Representations 463: 458: 457: 446: 437: 435: 428: 413: 412: 391: 386: 374: 355: 349: 330:Richard Dawkins 284: 255: 243: 229: 227: 221: 201:random sampling 185: 164: 149:truth-to-nature 125: 95:The problem of 82:reproducibility 72:as part of the 35: 32: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1805: 1803: 1795: 1794: 1784: 1783: 1777: 1776: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1764: 1763: 1760: 1759: 1757: 1756: 1747: 1742: 1733: 1728: 1722: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1713: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1667: 1662: 1656: 1654: 1650: 1649: 1647: 1646: 1638: 1630: 1622: 1614: 1606: 1598: 1590: 1582: 1574: 1566: 1558: 1550: 1542: 1533: 1531: 1527: 1526: 1524: 1523: 1518: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1501:Émile Durkheim 1498: 1493: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1472: 1470: 1466: 1465: 1463: 1462: 1454: 1446: 1438: 1430: 1422: 1414: 1406: 1398: 1389: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1380: 1379: 1373: 1367: 1357: 1347: 1342:Methodenstreit 1336: 1334: 1326: 1325: 1322: 1315: 1314: 1311: 1310: 1308: 1307: 1302: 1297: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1283:Social science 1280: 1275: 1270: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1258: 1253: 1243: 1238: 1236:Operationalism 1233: 1228: 1223: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1181: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1148: 1146: 1145:Related topics 1142: 1141: 1139: 1138: 1132: 1125: 1123: 1111: 1110: 1108: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1082: 1077: 1072: 1067: 1062: 1053: 1051:Falsifiability 1048: 1043: 1038: 1036:Antipositivism 1032: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1023: 1022: 1017: 1012: 1007: 1002: 997: 992: 987: 982: 976: 974: 970: 969: 967: 966: 961: 956: 951: 946: 941: 939:Postpositivism 936: 931: 926: 920: 918: 914: 913: 911: 910: 905: 900: 895: 889: 887: 879: 878: 873: 871: 870: 863: 856: 848: 842: 841: 803: 796: 789: 777: 774: 773: 772: 762:Bricmont, Jean 755: 745: 733: 723: 708: 705: 702: 701: 660:(3): 575–599. 630: 623: 601: 583: 546: 539: 516: 509: 489: 470:(40): 81–128. 444: 426: 420:. Zone Books. 388: 387: 385: 382: 381: 380: 373: 370: 348: 342: 283: 279:Thomas Kuhn's 277: 273:operationalism 263:interpretivism 254: 251: 223:Main article: 220: 217: 189:cognitive bias 184: 181: 124: 121: 87: 33: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1804: 1793: 1790: 1789: 1787: 1774: 1769: 1754: 1753: 1748: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1739: 1734: 1732: 1729: 1727: 1724: 1723: 1721: 1717: 1711: 1708: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1698: 1696: 1695:György Lukács 1693: 1691: 1688: 1686: 1683: 1681: 1678: 1676: 1673: 1671: 1668: 1666: 1663: 1661: 1658: 1657: 1655: 1651: 1644: 1643: 1639: 1636: 1635: 1631: 1628: 1627: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1564: 1563: 1559: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1532: 1528: 1522: 1521:Vienna Circle 1519: 1517: 1516:Berlin Circle 1514: 1512: 1509: 1507: 1504: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1496:Eugen DĂĽhring 1494: 1492: 1491:Auguste Comte 1489: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1471: 1467: 1460: 1459: 1455: 1452: 1451: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1420: 1419: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1388: 1386:Contributions 1384: 1377: 1374: 1371: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1358: 1354: 1353: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1320: 1316: 1306: 1303: 1301: 1300:Structuralism 1298: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1279: 1276: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1262: 1259: 1257: 1254: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1241:Phenomenalism 1239: 1237: 1234: 1232: 1229: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1207: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1158: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152:Behavioralism 1150: 1149: 1147: 1143: 1136: 1133: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1124: 1122: 1117: 1112: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1080:Human science 1078: 1076: 1073: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1052: 1049: 1047: 1044: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1034: 1033: 1031: 1027: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1005:Pseudoscience 1003: 1001: 1000:Justification 998: 996: 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 978: 977: 975: 971: 965: 962: 960: 957: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 940: 937: 935: 932: 930: 927: 925: 922: 921: 919: 915: 909: 906: 904: 901: 899: 896: 894: 891: 890: 888: 884: 880: 876: 869: 864: 862: 857: 855: 850: 849: 846: 831: 827: 823: 819: 818: 813: 809: 804: 801: 797: 794: 790: 787: 783: 782:Gaukroger, S. 780: 779: 775: 770: 768: 763: 759: 756: 753: 749: 746: 743: 742: 737: 736:Latour, Bruno 734: 731: 727: 724: 721: 719: 714: 711: 710: 706: 691:on 2017-08-29 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 648: 641: 639: 637: 635: 631: 626: 620: 616: 612: 605: 602: 597: 593: 587: 584: 569: 562: 561: 553: 551: 547: 542: 540:9780387347080 536: 532: 531: 523: 521: 517: 512: 510:9780761941996 506: 502: 501: 493: 490: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 462: 455: 453: 451: 449: 445: 434:on 2017-05-22 433: 429: 427:9781890951795 423: 419: 418: 410: 408: 406: 404: 402: 400: 398: 396: 394: 390: 383: 379: 376: 375: 371: 369: 366: 365:Donna Haraway 362: 361: 354: 347: 341: 339: 335: 331: 326: 323: 319: 315: 311: 306: 304: 300: 295: 291: 290: 282: 276: 274: 270: 269: 264: 260: 252: 250: 247: 240: 237: 233: 226: 218: 216: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 197:sampling bias 194: 193:cultural bias 190: 182: 180: 177: 172: 170: 162: 157: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 137:Francis Bacon 134: 133:Enlightenment 130: 122: 120: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 91: 85: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 39: 30: 19: 1640: 1632: 1624: 1616: 1608: 1600: 1592: 1584: 1576: 1568: 1560: 1552: 1544: 1536: 1456: 1448: 1440: 1432: 1424: 1416: 1408: 1400: 1392: 1376:Science wars 1230: 1174:Epistemology 1105:Reflectivism 1065:Hermeneutics 917:Declinations 893:Antihumanism 886:Perspectives 833:. Retrieved 815: 799: 792: 785: 765: 751: 739: 729: 726:Kuhn, Thomas 716: 693:. Retrieved 686:the original 657: 653: 610: 604: 586: 575:, retrieved 568:the original 559: 529: 499: 492: 467: 436:. Retrieved 432:the original 416: 358: 356: 345: 327: 307: 287: 285: 280: 266: 256: 241: 232:peer reviews 228: 213:Pierre Duhem 205:double-blind 186: 175: 173: 160: 158: 148: 141:Isaac Newton 135:philosopher 126: 101:subjectivity 94: 86:demonstrated 49: 43: 1731:Objectivity 1700:Karl Popper 1690:Thomas Kuhn 1670:Mario Bunge 1421:(1879–1884) 1356:(1909–1959) 1090:Metaphysics 1070:Historicism 985:Demarcation 980:Consilience 903:Rationalism 758:Sokal, Alan 615:Picador USA 577:14 November 417:Objectivity 318:Karl Popper 294:Thomas Kuhn 153:naturalists 78:testability 70:observation 50:objectivity 1511:Ernst Mach 1506:Ernst Laas 1481:A. J. Ayer 1469:Proponents 1288:Philosophy 1085:Humanities 1029:Antitheses 898:Empiricism 875:Positivism 722:. Phoenix. 695:2015-07-23 624:0312204078 438:2015-07-23 384:References 338:relativist 334:Alan Sokal 259:positivism 169:scientists 163:appeared. 1752:Verstehen 1738:Phronesis 1726:Knowledge 1710:Max Weber 1530:Criticism 1278:Sociology 1216:Modernism 1194:pluralism 1179:anarchism 1075:Historism 995:Induction 908:Scientism 830:1095-5054 303:paradigms 209:economics 145:epistemic 1786:Category 1773:Category 1189:nihilism 1184:idealism 1114:Related 990:Evidence 764:(1999). 750:(1958). 738:(1987). 728:(1962). 715:(2003). 682:39794636 594:(2000). 372:See also 363:(1988), 312:a given 299:de facto 271:and the 66:evidence 54:research 1653:Critics 1378:(1990s) 1372:(1980s) 1366:(1960s) 1346:(1890s) 1199:realism 1131:(1830s) 1119:in the 814:(ed.). 707:Sources 674:3178066 613:. USA: 484:2928741 310:falsify 123:History 46:science 1645:(1986) 1637:(1980) 1629:(1978) 1621:(1968) 1613:(1964) 1605:(1963) 1597:(1962) 1589:(1960) 1581:(1951) 1573:(1942) 1565:(1936) 1557:(1934) 1549:(1923) 1541:(1909) 1461:(2001) 1453:(1959) 1445:(1936) 1437:(1927) 1429:(1886) 1413:(1869) 1405:(1848) 1397:(1830) 1333:Method 1206:Holism 1137:(1927) 835:31 May 828:  760:& 680:  672:  621:  537:  507:  482:  424:  322:ad hoc 58:biases 1745:Truth 810:. In 689:(PDF) 678:S2CID 670:JSTOR 650:(PDF) 571:(PDF) 564:(PDF) 480:JSTOR 464:(PDF) 195:, or 62:facts 837:2018 826:ISSN 619:ISBN 579:2014 535:ISBN 505:ISBN 422:ISBN 332:and 203:and 127:The 80:and 64:and 662:doi 472:doi 357:In 215:). 44:In 1788:: 676:. 668:. 658:14 656:. 652:. 633:^ 617:. 549:^ 519:^ 478:. 466:. 447:^ 392:^ 191:, 119:. 48:, 867:e 860:t 853:v 839:. 698:. 664:: 627:. 598:. 543:. 513:. 486:. 474:: 441:. 165:" 31:. 20:)

Index

Scientific objectivity
Objectivity (disambiguation)

science
research
biases
facts
evidence
observation
scientific method
testability
reproducibility
collective understanding
philosophical objectivity
subjectivity
overgeneralization
Newton's law of universal gravitation
celestial bodies
theory of relativity
scientific method
Enlightenment
Francis Bacon
Isaac Newton
epistemic
naturalists
scientists
cognitive bias
cultural bias
sampling bias
random sampling

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑