Knowledge (XXG)

Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code

Source đź“ť

467:"The existence of these obsolete offences in this country had been used by other countries as justification for the retention of similar laws which have been actively used to suppress political dissent and restrict press freedom. Abolishing these offences will allow the UK to take a lead in challenging similar laws in other countries, where they are used to suppress free speech.” 293:, who presided over Tilak's case, widened the understanding of Section 124A. Under Strachey's definition, the attempt to excite "feelings of enmity" against the government was also a form of sedition. Tilak was found guilty by the jury and sentenced to 18 months of rigorous imprisonment. Tilak again faced charges against sedition for two 1159: 553:
A law student proposes "the following modification to the law is suggested. Section 124A should be retained subject to three conditions: first, that, the offender must be in a position of authority...; second, that, the offending words must be understood in context...; and, third, they should have a
117:
Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life,
393:
drew attention to the fact that the rate of conviction under sedition is very low and that this law has been misused by the executive powers. Some critics of the law further elaborate on this point by claiming that the purpose of this law is not to convict the charged, but to harass and to silence
159:
Whoever by words, either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, excites, or attempts to excite, feelings of disaffection to the Government established by law in British India, shall be punished with transportation for life or for any term, to which
189:
Stephen's version of 1870 was amended to a large extent through the IPC Amendment Act of 1898. The current section stands very much similar to the 1898 section; however minor alterations were made at various points in India's colonial and post-colonial history—in 1937, 1948, 1950, and by Part B
167:
Such a disapprobation of the measures of the Government as is compatible with a disposition to render obedience to the lawful authority of the Government, and to support the lawful authority, of the Government, against unlawful attempts to subvert or resist that authority, is not disaffection.
102:
introduces the criminal law into the parliament and said sedition has been turned into treason. As per the proposed laws, the criticising government is fully permissible. Any activity will be considered treason only if it is intended against the integrity, sovereignty, and unity of the nation.
197:
heard by the Allahabad High Court declared the sedition law void. The Punjab high court had also struck down the law. A Supreme Court judgment in 1962 brought back sedition into the Constitution, interpreting the section to say that it only applies if there is "incitement to violence".
489:“We have noticed, with dismay, a growing trend in India in recent times where both central and state governments have routinely slapped sedition charges on journalists for articles, tweets, Facebook posts that criticise government policies…In January 2021, IWPC founder member 250:. The Act was described as "forced Europeanisation" and a gag on Hindus, who were described as legally incapable and prevented from rebelling against the Act. The authorities put forth a claim that Bose had incited rebellion; in his instructions to the jury, the Chief Justice 289:. This turned into an annual celebration commemorating the anniversary of Shivaji's coronation. Three years later, Tilak published reports of this celebration, as "Shivaji's Utterances"; this essay doubled as an attack on the colonial government. Justice 212:
suspended the colonial-era law. The court said that the law has been misused by governments to quash dissent and that it was not in tune with the times. Due to this, hundreds of people who were jailed under the law have become eligible for
134:.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the measures of the Government to obtain their alteration by lawful means, without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt, or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. 254:
explained the meaning of "disaffection" as "a feeling contrary to affection, in other words, dislike or hatred" and linked it with disobedience towards the government. Bose was nevertheless released on bail, and the case was dropped.
302:. Despite the verdict, this trial, according to historian Mithi Mukherjee, "marked a fundamental discursive rupture in the history of empire and paved the way for mass anticolonial movements under the leadership of Gandhi. In 1922, 297:
articles, titled "The Country's Misfortune" (12 May 1908) and "These Remedies Are Not Lasting" (9 June 1908). Once again Tilak was found guilty under the newly drafted section 124A, and sentenced to six years of imprisonment in
449:
and that it has no place in a modern democracy. Critics further point out that the law was introduced by the colonial government in India to curtail dissent and that Britain has since abolished this law in 2009. The then
316:'s imprisonment under the sedition section. While appearing in court, Gandhi referred to Section 124A as the "prince among the political sections of the Indian Penal Code designed to suppress the liberty of the citizen". 140:.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the Government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt, or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. 1160:"Disha Ravi, an environmental activist from Bengaluru, arrested by Delhi police and charged with sedition for 'formulation and dissemination' of a toolkit to aid protesting farmers which was shared by Greta Thunberg" 90:
was now permissible. In 1962 the Supreme Court of India interpreted the section to apply only if there is, say, "incitement to violence" or "overthrowing a democratically elected government through violent means".
36:. Section 124A forms part of Chapter VI of the Code which deals with offences against the state. Chapter VI comprises sections from 121 to 130, wherein sections 121A and 124A were introduced in 1870. The then 549:
officers, legal thinkers and judges, scholars, human rights and civil liberty advocates, journalists, and so on have commented against the sedition law, calling for it to be scrapped or undergo amendments.
217:. The ruling does not overturn the sedition law, the law has only been put on temporary hold and no further cases can be registered under this law until the ongoing review by the government is completed. 168:
therefore, the making of comments on the methods of the Government, with the intention of against unlawful a exciting only this species of disapprobation, is not an offence within this clause.
410:
proposed to "get rid of it " as written, and favoured handling sedition-related by other means. Several opinion-makers have called for the abolishing of sedition laws in the context of the
1434: 343:
During the 21st century, various notable authors, creative professionals, activists, and politicians have been charged with sedition under Section 124A. Cases include the then
1197: 1234: 664: 1798: 506:. Furthermore, some critics of the law say that the purpose of this law is not to convict, but for the government to harass its critics through the drawn out process. 1728: 829: 186:, and fearing that Muslim preachers would incite religious war in the Indian subcontinent, the Raj introduced this section under the title "Exciting disaffection". 1408: 403: 1699: 1613: 1337: 1285: 2269: 1491: 1383: 442:, an "astonishing number" of citizens faced trial under Section 124A: 23,000 were in temporary custody, of whom 9,000 were arrested only for sedition. 524: 434:
had been in power (2004–2014), the section had remained intact and was used to file charges on various citizens; following 2012-2013 protests against
262:
is historically famous. Tilak, a lawyer by training, was also politically active in support of independence. He established and published two dailies—
503: 178:
drafted the Penal Code in 1837. However, for reasons unknown, it was omitted from the actual Code. It was finally added in 1870 on the suggestion of
402:
In post-independence India, Section 124A came under criticism at numerous intervals, being singled out for its curbing of free speech. When the
1791: 1110: 967: 613: 451: 2196: 2186: 2150: 2134: 1964: 1183: 1133: 2233: 2212: 2176: 2140: 2004: 1931: 518: 455: 383:
Between 2014 and 2019, 326 sedition cases were filed in India, charge sheets were filed in 141 cases which resulted in only 6 convictions.
1259: 1084: 1312: 750: 2094: 1926: 1846: 1826: 1032: 777: 557:
In 2021, Kishorechandra Wangkhemcha and Kanhaiya Lal Shukla petitioned the Supreme Court against the law. The court admitted the case.
2069: 1821: 1460: 728: 202: 1647: 336:, which in 1962 ruled that speeches against the government or political parties were not illegal while upholding it as applicable to 1784: 803: 760: 1673: 1587: 718: 638: 888: 160:
fine may be added, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine.
435: 1946: 1916: 1054: 2044: 2034: 2024: 1941: 1911: 1891: 1861: 118:
to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine.
2294: 2170: 2160: 2114: 2014: 1994: 1984: 1974: 1936: 1921: 1906: 1896: 1886: 1871: 1856: 1831: 546: 530: 337: 286: 1901: 1881: 1866: 1851: 1836: 2299: 2289: 2279: 2089: 2084: 2079: 2074: 1876: 1841: 580: 423: 1756: 2274: 2052: 1956: 431: 415: 37: 914: 1517: 855: 2124: 994: 175: 1435:"Editors Guild welcomes Supreme Court verdict on sedition case against Vinod Dua | India News - Times of India" 427: 332:, which also concluded that it struck at the very root of free speech. The Government of India appealed to the 247: 419: 179: 44:
on the Indian subcontinent would wage a war against them. Particularly after the successful suppression of
889:"Supreme Court order brings hope for thousands jailed on controversial colonial-era sedition law in India" 502:
has condemned the use of this law by state governments against senior journalists for the coverage of the
473: 430:(INC) included a specific proposal to abolish Section 124A in their manifesto. However, while the INC-led 387: 333: 251: 209: 95: 2243: 1968: 542: 344: 299: 60: 1546: 2206: 352: 329: 445:
Critics of the law claim that sedition is an outdated law from the colonial era and it curtails the
422:
published a consultation paper that asked for a possible amendment or repeal of the law. During the
2008: 499: 231: 1998: 1978: 1014: 79: 945: 1461:"Journalists' Bodies Slam Sedition FIRs Against Editors, Reporters for Farmers' Rally Coverage" 1235:"Is India made of porcelain? Question CJI Ramana should ask Modi govt at next sedition hearing" 2284: 2164: 2118: 1807: 1621: 1568: 1205: 1198:"Why do you need the 'colonial law' of sedition after 75 years of Independence, CJI asks govt" 863: 756: 724: 446: 325: 313: 56: 41: 25: 493:
and some other journalists were booked for sedition for tweets relating to farmers’ protest.”
2018: 1558: 1006: 560:
As of 11 May 2022, the law has been put on hold by the Supreme Court citing re-examination.
411: 407: 267: 239: 201:
Sedition was made cognizable for the first time during the tenure of Indira Gandhi via the
182:, at the time handling legal issues in the colonial Government of India. Due to increasing 2237: 639:"SC puts sedition trials on hold until Govt re-examines it, says affected can seek relief" 348: 290: 174:
The section related to sedition initially had its place in the code, as Section 113, when
74:
The section kept drawing criticism in independent India as well for being a hindrance to
55:, the need was felt for such a law. Throughout the Raj, the section was used to suppress 1384:"India's sedition law is just another colonial hangover and has no place in a democracy" 915:"India's top court halts use of controversial sedition law in rebuke to the government" 303: 279: 259: 87: 68: 64: 328:
ruled Section 124A to be unconstitutional. A similar ruling was passed in 1959 by the
2263: 2180: 2048: 1360: 1018: 368: 364: 360: 83: 2098: 490: 390: 514:
The following laws in India address the same aspects covered by the sedition law—
2202: 2190: 2128: 665:"'Sedition to be treason': Amit Shah explains proposed changes to criminal laws" 459: 356: 308: 75: 33: 128:.—The expression “disaffection” includes disloyalty and all feelings of enmity. 2028: 439: 372: 1625: 1572: 1209: 1010: 867: 2154: 2144: 1134:"Kerala: Two students of Malappuram college arrested on charges of sedition" 183: 99: 46: 1492:"Six Decades Later, Challenge To Sedition Law Is Back In The Supreme Court" 995:"Sedition, Law, and the British Empire in India: The Trial of Tilak (1908)" 2247: 2108: 29: 690: 2038: 282: 1563: 1338:"Congress manifesto promises to do away with British-era sedition law" 480:, and has demanded the repeal of this law and has also expressed that 1988: 830:"How a Supreme Court judgment brought back the sedition law in India" 1776: 1184:
326 sedition cases filed in india between 2014 19 only 6 convictions
752:
Offend, Shock, or Disturb: Free Speech under the Indian Constitution
394:
critics of the government by the means of a long drawn out process.
2216: 1729:"Sedition: Why does India follow a law that the world has junked?" 541:
Numerous critics, students, former government employees including
1614:"Sedition law | Supreme Court sends strong message to government" 275: 214: 82:
for the first time in history in India, during the tenure of PM
50: 1780: 278:. In 1894, Professor R. P. Karkaria presented his paper on the 581:"The Case to Amend Sedition Law, India's Self-Inflicted Wound" 94:
As of 11 May 2022, This law has been put on temporary hold by
968:"Panel Discussion on Free Speech and Sedition in a Democracy" 1700:"Why Supreme Court must strike down sedition law entirely" 1409:"Sedition law in UK abolished in 2009, continues in India" 778:"Section 124A: An Archaic Way to Stifle Dissent In India" 340:; this pronouncement had the effect of diluting the law. 230:
The first known registered case under the section was in
1547:"A Theoretical Analysis of the Law on Sedition in India" 482:"this law has no space in any modern liberal democracy" 98:
citing re-examination. In December 2023, Home Minister
32:. The Indian Penal Code was enacted in 1860, under the 1313:"Law Commission calls for re-think on sedition clause" 856:"India's Top Court Suspends Colonial-Era Sedition Law" 554:
tendency to actually cause violence or disorder....""
1085:"To repeal or not: Nehruvian dilemma on sedition law" 1648:"Don't let sedition law make a mockery of democracy" 484:. The Indian Women Press Corps (IWPC) also has said: 2226: 2062: 1955: 1814: 1518:"India's Absurd Sedition Law – And What It Enables" 723:. Universal Law Publishing. pp. 220, 226–227. 1727: 71:, both of whom were found guilty and imprisoned. 1361:"Why India needs to get rid of its sedition law" 614:"Disagreeing with govt is not sedition, says SC" 154: 1286:"The Indian State must scrap the sedition law" 1033:"Republic of dissent: Gandhi's sedition trial" 1792: 1260:"Why India's sedition law needs to be buried" 8: 1997:(false evidence to procure conviction for a 404:First Amendment of the Constitution of India 2173:(culpable homicide not amounting to murder) 1078: 1076: 1799: 1785: 1777: 913:Swati Gupta and Rhea Mogul (11 May 2022). 854:Kumar, Hari; Yasir, Sameer (11 May 2022). 1562: 1158:SAYEED, VIKHAR AHMED (15 February 2021). 712: 710: 708: 1674:"Amend sedition law to check its misuse" 1311:Rajagopal, Krishnadas (30 August 2018). 1111:"5 high profile sedition cases in India" 946:"A Look Back At Tilak's Sedition Trials" 939: 937: 935: 744: 742: 740: 579:Chndrachud, Abhinav (22 February 2021). 691:"Section 124A in The Indian Penal Code" 568: 238:. Bose's article, published in his own 205:(CR.P.C) which replaced the 1898 CRPC. 1612:Rajagopal, Krishnadas (15 July 2021). 1196:Rajagopal, Krishnadas (15 July 2021). 452:Parliamentary Under Secretary of State 274:in English; both being published from 1722: 1720: 1540: 1538: 1485: 1483: 1481: 1228: 1226: 236:Queen Empress v Jogendra Chunder Bose 7: 1588:"Scrap sedition. Stop UAPA's misuse" 1186:, freepressjournal.in, 19 July 2021. 804:"The nine lives of the sedition law" 607: 605: 603: 601: 574: 572: 1586:Azad, Yashovardhan (20 July 2021). 537:Amending and repealing Section 124A 406:was passed in 1951, Prime Minister 258:The sedition trial of 1897 against 157:Section 124A. Exciting disaffection 86:in 1973, that is, arrest without a 828:Noorani, A. G. (15 January 2021). 802:Bhatia, Gautam (24 January 2016). 16:Law on the punishment for sedition 14: 2270:Sections of the Indian Penal Code 1490:Chaturvedi, Arpan (11 May 2021). 1359:Biswas, Soutik (29 August 2016). 1055:"Anti-sedition law needs the bin" 782:Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news 720:Textbook on the Indian Penal Code 338:separatism by persuasion or force 1672:Sarna, Ayush (15 October 2019). 1646:Dwivedi, Rakesh (20 July 2021). 1516:Sharma, Aditya (22 March 2021). 523:Public Safety Acts (such as the 1698:Singh, Anushka (17 July 2021). 1233:Gupta, Shekhar (17 July 2021). 999:Law, Culture and the Humanities 612:Utkarsh, Anand (4 March 2021). 287:Royal Asiatic Society in Bombay 203:1973 Code of Criminal Procedure 1755:S.G.VOMBATKERE (15 May 2022). 436:Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant 147:Development and current status 1: 1551:Christ University Law Journal 1545:Aishwarya, Narayanan (2015). 944:Saxena, Namit (8 July 2018). 776:Kumar, Ayush (3 March 2021). 547:Indian Administrative Service 28:lays down the punishment for 2051:with murder or resulting in 1035:. Live Mint. 25 January 2019 424:2019 Indian general election 2053:persistent vegetative state 1340:. India Today. 2 April 2019 1113:. Rediff. 13 September 2012 755:. Oxford University Press. 432:United Progressive Alliance 416:Jawaharlal Nehru University 345:Vishva Hindu Parishad (VHP) 38:British government of India 2316: 717:Gaur, Krishna Deo (2009). 1757:"Sedition and the L BJaw" 1678:Tribuneindia News Service 1652:Tribuneindia News Service 993:Mukherjee, Mithi (2020). 371:(2019), climate activist 367:(2012), student activist 176:Thomas Babington Macaulay 2137:(privacy of rape victim) 1979:waging war against India 1957:Capital offence sections 1011:10.1177/1743872116685034 428:Indian National Congress 248:Age of Consent Act, 1891 190:States (Law) Act, 1951. 2199:(attempted acid attack) 749:Bhatia, Gautam (2016). 519:Unlawful Activities Act 474:Editor's Guild of India 420:Law Commission of India 180:James Fitzjames Stephen 2207:unnatural sex offences 1382:Reema Omer, Dawn com. 1091:. No. The Tribune 496: 470: 388:Chief Justice of India 334:Supreme Court of India 312:resulted into his and 306:'s three articles for 252:William Comer Petheram 210:Supreme Court of India 171: 152:Historical text (1870) 112:Section 124A. Sedition 96:Supreme Court of India 78:. Sedition was made a 543:Indian Police Service 531:National Security Act 486: 464: 386:On 15 July 2021, the 208:On May 11, 2022, the 2295:Free speech case law 353:Simranjit Singh Mann 330:Allahabad High Court 2300:Separatism in India 2290:Censorship in India 2280:1870 in British law 1969:criminal conspiracy 1021:– via SCOPUS. 500:Press Club of India 456:Ministry of Justice 379:Low conviction rate 363:(2010), cartoonist 232:Calcutta High Court 195:Ram Nandan v State, 2275:1870 introductions 1734:The Times of India 1704:The Indian Express 1441:. TNN. 5 June 2021 1439:The Times of India 1415:. 14 February 2016 860:The New York Times 671:. 21 December 2023 643:The Indian Express 476:has called this a 347:general secretary 80:cognisable offence 2257: 2256: 2238:attempted suicide 2165:culpable homicide 2119:unlawful assembly 1808:Indian Penal Code 1564:10.12728/culj.6.5 1292:. 15 January 2019 1266:. 18 January 2019 1089:10 September 2018 1061:. 15 January 2019 447:freedom of speech 426:, the opposition 326:Punjab High Court 320:Post-independence 314:Shankarlal Banker 246:, criticized the 184:Wahabi activities 57:political dissent 42:Khilafat movement 26:Indian Penal Code 2307: 1801: 1794: 1787: 1778: 1772: 1771: 1769: 1767: 1752: 1746: 1745: 1743: 1741: 1731: 1724: 1715: 1714: 1712: 1710: 1695: 1689: 1688: 1686: 1684: 1669: 1663: 1662: 1660: 1658: 1643: 1637: 1636: 1634: 1632: 1609: 1603: 1602: 1600: 1598: 1583: 1577: 1576: 1566: 1542: 1533: 1532: 1530: 1528: 1513: 1507: 1506: 1504: 1502: 1487: 1476: 1475: 1473: 1471: 1457: 1451: 1450: 1448: 1446: 1431: 1425: 1424: 1422: 1420: 1405: 1399: 1398: 1396: 1394: 1379: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1368: 1356: 1350: 1349: 1347: 1345: 1334: 1328: 1327: 1325: 1323: 1308: 1302: 1301: 1299: 1297: 1282: 1276: 1275: 1273: 1271: 1256: 1250: 1249: 1247: 1245: 1230: 1221: 1220: 1218: 1216: 1193: 1187: 1181: 1175: 1174: 1172: 1170: 1155: 1149: 1148: 1146: 1144: 1129: 1123: 1122: 1120: 1118: 1107: 1101: 1100: 1098: 1096: 1083:Prakash, Satya. 1080: 1071: 1070: 1068: 1066: 1051: 1045: 1044: 1042: 1040: 1029: 1023: 1022: 990: 984: 983: 981: 979: 964: 958: 957: 955: 953: 941: 930: 929: 927: 925: 910: 904: 903: 901: 899: 885: 879: 878: 876: 874: 851: 845: 844: 842: 840: 825: 819: 818: 816: 814: 799: 793: 792: 790: 788: 773: 767: 766: 746: 735: 734: 714: 703: 702: 700: 698: 687: 681: 680: 678: 676: 661: 655: 654: 652: 650: 635: 629: 628: 626: 624: 609: 596: 595: 593: 591: 576: 504:farmers protests 408:Jawaharlal Nehru 226:Pre-independence 193:A case in 1958, 54: 40:feared that the 2315: 2314: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2253: 2222: 2058: 1999:capital offence 1951: 1810: 1805: 1775: 1765: 1763: 1754: 1753: 1749: 1739: 1737: 1726: 1725: 1718: 1708: 1706: 1697: 1696: 1692: 1682: 1680: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1656: 1654: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1630: 1628: 1611: 1610: 1606: 1596: 1594: 1592:Hindustan Times 1585: 1584: 1580: 1544: 1543: 1536: 1526: 1524: 1522:thediplomat.com 1515: 1514: 1510: 1500: 1498: 1489: 1488: 1479: 1469: 1467: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1444: 1442: 1433: 1432: 1428: 1418: 1416: 1413:Hindustan Times 1407: 1406: 1402: 1392: 1390: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1366: 1364: 1358: 1357: 1353: 1343: 1341: 1336: 1335: 1331: 1321: 1319: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1295: 1293: 1290:Hindustan Times 1284: 1283: 1279: 1269: 1267: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1243: 1241: 1232: 1231: 1224: 1214: 1212: 1195: 1194: 1190: 1182: 1178: 1168: 1166: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1142: 1140: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1116: 1114: 1109: 1108: 1104: 1094: 1092: 1082: 1081: 1074: 1064: 1062: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1038: 1036: 1031: 1030: 1026: 992: 991: 987: 977: 975: 974:. 24 March 2016 966: 965: 961: 951: 949: 943: 942: 933: 923: 921: 912: 911: 907: 897: 895: 893:www.cbsnews.com 887: 886: 882: 872: 870: 853: 852: 848: 838: 836: 827: 826: 822: 812: 810: 801: 800: 796: 786: 784: 775: 774: 770: 763: 748: 747: 738: 731: 716: 715: 706: 696: 694: 693:. Indian Kanoon 689: 688: 684: 674: 672: 669:Hindustan Times 663: 662: 658: 648: 646: 637: 636: 632: 622: 620: 618:Hindustan Times 611: 610: 599: 589: 587: 578: 577: 570: 566: 539: 512: 478:"draconian law" 418:. In 2018, the 400: 381: 359:(2007), author 349:Praveen Togadia 322: 291:Arthur Strachey 228: 223: 172: 153: 149: 109: 45: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2313: 2311: 2303: 2302: 2297: 2292: 2287: 2282: 2277: 2272: 2262: 2261: 2255: 2254: 2252: 2251: 2241: 2230: 2228: 2224: 2223: 2221: 2220: 2210: 2200: 2194: 2184: 2174: 2168: 2158: 2148: 2138: 2132: 2122: 2112: 2102: 2092: 2087: 2082: 2077: 2072: 2066: 2064: 2063:Other sections 2060: 2059: 2057: 2056: 2055:of the victim) 2042: 2032: 2022: 2012: 2002: 1992: 1982: 1972: 1961: 1959: 1953: 1952: 1950: 1949: 1944: 1939: 1934: 1929: 1924: 1919: 1914: 1909: 1904: 1899: 1894: 1889: 1884: 1879: 1874: 1869: 1864: 1859: 1854: 1849: 1844: 1839: 1834: 1829: 1824: 1818: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1806: 1804: 1803: 1796: 1789: 1781: 1774: 1773: 1747: 1716: 1690: 1664: 1638: 1604: 1578: 1534: 1508: 1496:BloombergQuint 1477: 1452: 1426: 1400: 1374: 1351: 1329: 1303: 1277: 1251: 1222: 1188: 1176: 1150: 1132:Scroll Staff. 1124: 1102: 1072: 1059:Economic Times 1046: 1024: 1005:(3): 454–476. 985: 959: 931: 905: 880: 846: 820: 794: 768: 761: 736: 730:978-8175347038 729: 704: 682: 656: 630: 597: 567: 565: 562: 538: 535: 534: 533: 528: 521: 511: 508: 399: 396: 380: 377: 321: 318: 304:Mahatma Gandhi 260:Lokmanya Tilak 227: 224: 222: 219: 170: 169: 151: 150: 148: 145: 144: 143: 142: 141: 135: 129: 120: 119: 108: 105: 88:police warrant 69:Mahatma Gandhi 65:Lokmanya Tilak 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2312: 2301: 2298: 2296: 2293: 2291: 2288: 2286: 2283: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2273: 2271: 2268: 2267: 2265: 2249: 2245: 2242: 2239: 2235: 2232: 2231: 2229: 2225: 2218: 2214: 2211: 2208: 2204: 2201: 2198: 2195: 2192: 2188: 2185: 2182: 2181:grievous hurt 2178: 2175: 2172: 2169: 2166: 2162: 2159: 2156: 2152: 2149: 2146: 2142: 2139: 2136: 2133: 2130: 2126: 2123: 2120: 2116: 2113: 2110: 2106: 2103: 2100: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2088: 2086: 2083: 2081: 2078: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2068: 2067: 2065: 2061: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2043: 2040: 2036: 2033: 2030: 2026: 2023: 2020: 2016: 2013: 2010: 2006: 2003: 2000: 1996: 1993: 1990: 1986: 1983: 1980: 1976: 1973: 1970: 1966: 1963: 1962: 1960: 1958: 1954: 1948: 1947:Chapter XXIII 1945: 1943: 1940: 1938: 1935: 1933: 1930: 1928: 1925: 1923: 1920: 1918: 1917:Chapter XVIII 1915: 1913: 1910: 1908: 1905: 1903: 1900: 1898: 1895: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1885: 1883: 1880: 1878: 1875: 1873: 1870: 1868: 1865: 1863: 1860: 1858: 1855: 1853: 1850: 1848: 1845: 1843: 1840: 1838: 1835: 1833: 1830: 1828: 1825: 1823: 1820: 1819: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1802: 1797: 1795: 1790: 1788: 1783: 1782: 1779: 1762: 1758: 1751: 1748: 1736:. 3 June 2021 1735: 1730: 1723: 1721: 1717: 1705: 1701: 1694: 1691: 1679: 1675: 1668: 1665: 1653: 1649: 1642: 1639: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1608: 1605: 1593: 1589: 1582: 1579: 1574: 1570: 1565: 1560: 1557:(1): 87–101. 1556: 1552: 1548: 1541: 1539: 1535: 1523: 1519: 1512: 1509: 1497: 1493: 1486: 1484: 1482: 1478: 1466: 1462: 1456: 1453: 1440: 1436: 1430: 1427: 1414: 1410: 1404: 1401: 1389: 1385: 1378: 1375: 1362: 1355: 1352: 1339: 1333: 1330: 1318: 1314: 1307: 1304: 1291: 1287: 1281: 1278: 1265: 1261: 1255: 1252: 1240: 1236: 1229: 1227: 1223: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1192: 1189: 1185: 1180: 1177: 1165: 1161: 1154: 1151: 1139: 1135: 1128: 1125: 1112: 1106: 1103: 1090: 1086: 1079: 1077: 1073: 1060: 1056: 1050: 1047: 1034: 1028: 1025: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 989: 986: 973: 969: 963: 960: 947: 940: 938: 936: 932: 920: 916: 909: 906: 894: 890: 884: 881: 869: 865: 861: 857: 850: 847: 835: 831: 824: 821: 809: 805: 798: 795: 783: 779: 772: 769: 764: 762:9780199089529 758: 754: 753: 745: 743: 741: 737: 732: 726: 722: 721: 713: 711: 709: 705: 692: 686: 683: 670: 666: 660: 657: 645:. 12 May 2022 644: 640: 634: 631: 619: 615: 608: 606: 604: 602: 598: 586: 582: 575: 573: 569: 563: 561: 558: 555: 551: 548: 544: 536: 532: 529: 526: 522: 520: 517: 516: 515: 509: 507: 505: 501: 495: 494: 492: 485: 483: 479: 475: 469: 468: 463: 461: 457: 453: 448: 443: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 412:2016 protests 409: 405: 397: 395: 392: 389: 384: 378: 376: 374: 370: 369:Rinshad Reera 366: 365:Aseem Trivedi 362: 361:Arundhati Roy 358: 354: 350: 346: 341: 339: 335: 331: 327: 324:In 1951, the 319: 317: 315: 311: 310: 305: 301: 296: 292: 288: 284: 281: 277: 273: 269: 265: 261: 256: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 225: 221:Notable cases 220: 218: 216: 211: 206: 204: 199: 196: 191: 187: 185: 181: 177: 166: 163: 162: 161: 158: 146: 139: 138:Explanation 3 136: 133: 132:Explanation 2 130: 127: 126:Explanation 1 124: 123: 122: 121: 116: 115: 114: 113: 106: 104: 101: 97: 92: 89: 85: 84:Indira Gandhi 81: 77: 72: 70: 66: 62: 59:in favour of 58: 52: 48: 43: 39: 35: 31: 27: 23: 19: 2104: 2099:court of law 2041:with murder) 1942:Chapter XXII 1912:Chapter XVII 1892:Chapter XIII 1862:Chapter VIII 1764:. Retrieved 1760: 1750: 1738:. Retrieved 1733: 1707:. Retrieved 1703: 1693: 1681:. Retrieved 1677: 1667: 1655:. Retrieved 1651: 1641: 1629:. Retrieved 1617: 1607: 1595:. Retrieved 1591: 1581: 1554: 1550: 1525:. Retrieved 1521: 1511: 1499:. Retrieved 1495: 1468:. Retrieved 1464: 1455: 1443:. Retrieved 1438: 1429: 1417:. Retrieved 1412: 1403: 1391:. Retrieved 1387: 1377: 1365:. Retrieved 1354: 1342:. Retrieved 1332: 1320:. Retrieved 1316: 1306: 1294:. Retrieved 1289: 1280: 1268:. Retrieved 1263: 1254: 1242:. Retrieved 1238: 1213:. Retrieved 1201: 1191: 1179: 1167:. Retrieved 1163: 1153: 1141:. Retrieved 1137: 1127: 1115:. Retrieved 1105: 1093:. Retrieved 1088: 1063:. Retrieved 1058: 1049: 1037:. Retrieved 1027: 1002: 998: 988: 976:. Retrieved 971: 962: 950:. Retrieved 922:. Retrieved 918: 908: 896:. Retrieved 892: 883: 871:. Retrieved 859: 849: 837:. Retrieved 833: 823: 811:. Retrieved 807: 797: 785:. Retrieved 781: 771: 751: 719: 695:. Retrieved 685: 673:. Retrieved 668: 659: 647:. Retrieved 642: 633: 621:. Retrieved 617: 588:. Retrieved 584: 559: 556: 552: 540: 513: 510:Alternatives 497: 491:Mrinal Pande 488: 487: 481: 477: 471: 466: 465: 444: 401: 385: 382: 342: 323: 307: 294: 280:Maratha king 271: 263: 257: 243: 235: 229: 207: 200: 194: 192: 188: 173: 165:Explanation: 164: 156: 155: 137: 131: 125: 111: 110: 93: 73: 63:, including 61:independence 22:Section 124A 21: 20: 18: 2191:acid attack 2129:hate speech 2031:for ransom) 1937:Chapter XXI 1932:Chapter XXA 1922:Chapter XIX 1907:Chapter XVI 1897:Chapter XIV 1887:Chapter XII 1872:Chapter IXA 1857:Chapter VII 1832:Chapter III 1761:The Citizen 675:21 December 460:Claire Ward 391:N.V. Ramana 357:Binayak Sen 309:Young India 76:free speech 34:British Raj 2264:Categories 2029:kidnapping 2017:(abetting 1927:Chapter XX 1902:Chapter XV 1882:Chapter XI 1867:Chapter IX 1852:Chapter VI 1847:Chapter VA 1837:Chapter IV 1827:Chapter II 948:. Live Law 585:TheLeaflet 564:References 440:Tamil Nadu 373:Disha Ravi 2155:blasphemy 2145:obscenity 1877:Chapter X 1842:Chapter V 1822:Chapter I 1626:0971-751X 1618:The Hindu 1573:2278-4322 1388:Scroll.in 1317:The Hindu 1210:0971-751X 1202:The Hindu 1164:Frontline 1138:Scroll.in 1019:152184820 972:The Hindu 868:0362-4331 834:Frontline 398:Criticism 244:Bangobasi 242:magazine 234:in 1891; 100:Amit Shah 51:Waliullah 2285:Sedition 2248:adultery 2109:sedition 2005:302, 303 1815:Chapters 1465:The Wire 1239:ThePrint 375:(2020). 355:(2005), 351:(2003), 272:Mahratta 53:Movement 30:sedition 2227:Defunct 2039:dacoity 2019:suicide 1740:22 July 1709:22 July 1683:22 July 1657:22 July 1631:22 July 1597:22 July 1527:22 July 1501:22 July 1470:11 June 1445:11 June 1419:11 June 1393:11 June 1244:20 July 1215:20 July 1169:11 June 1143:11 June 839:5 March 813:5 March 787:5 March 623:5 March 590:5 March 458:of UK, 454:at the 414:at the 285:to the 283:Shivaji 268:Marathi 240:Bengali 24:of the 2009:murder 1989:mutiny 1766:18 May 1624:  1571:  1367:29 May 1344:29 May 1322:27 May 1296:29 May 1270:29 May 1208:  1117:28 May 1095:27 May 1065:27 May 1039:29 May 1017:  978:28 May 952:28 May 924:11 May 898:11 May 873:11 May 866:  759:  727:  697:22 May 649:12 May 525:JK PSA 295:Kesari 264:Kesari 47:Wahabi 2217:fraud 1363:. BBC 1015:S2CID 462:said: 300:Burma 2197:326B 2187:326A 2151:295A 2135:228A 2125:153A 2105:124A 2049:rape 2045:376A 2035:364A 2025:364A 1965:120B 1768:2022 1742:2021 1711:2021 1685:2021 1659:2021 1633:2021 1622:ISSN 1599:2021 1569:ISSN 1529:2021 1503:2021 1472:2021 1447:2021 1421:2021 1395:2021 1369:2019 1346:2019 1324:2019 1298:2019 1272:2019 1264:Mint 1246:2021 1217:2021 1206:ISSN 1171:2021 1145:2021 1119:2019 1097:2019 1067:2019 1041:2019 980:2019 954:2019 926:2022 900:2022 875:2022 864:ISSN 841:2021 815:2021 808:mint 789:2021 757:ISBN 725:ISBN 699:2019 677:2023 651:2022 625:2021 592:2021 545:and 498:The 472:The 276:Pune 270:and 215:bail 107:Text 67:and 2244:497 2234:309 2213:420 2203:377 2177:320 2171:304 2161:299 2141:294 2115:144 2015:305 1995:194 1985:122 1975:121 1559:doi 1007:doi 919:CNN 438:in 266:in 2266:: 2095:20 1759:. 1732:. 1719:^ 1702:. 1676:. 1650:. 1620:. 1616:. 1590:. 1567:. 1553:. 1549:. 1537:^ 1520:. 1494:. 1480:^ 1463:. 1437:. 1411:. 1386:. 1315:. 1288:. 1262:. 1237:. 1225:^ 1204:. 1200:. 1162:. 1136:. 1087:. 1075:^ 1057:. 1013:. 1003:16 1001:. 997:. 970:. 934:^ 917:. 891:. 862:. 858:. 832:. 806:. 780:. 739:^ 707:^ 667:. 641:. 616:. 600:^ 583:. 571:^ 2250:) 2246:( 2240:) 2236:( 2219:) 2215:( 2209:) 2205:( 2193:) 2189:( 2183:) 2179:( 2167:) 2163:( 2157:) 2153:( 2147:) 2143:( 2131:) 2127:( 2121:) 2117:( 2111:) 2107:( 2101:) 2097:( 2090:5 2085:4 2080:3 2075:2 2070:1 2047:( 2037:( 2027:( 2021:) 2011:) 2007:( 2001:) 1991:) 1987:( 1981:) 1977:( 1971:) 1967:( 1800:e 1793:t 1786:v 1770:. 1744:. 1713:. 1687:. 1661:. 1635:. 1601:. 1575:. 1561:: 1555:4 1531:. 1505:. 1474:. 1449:. 1423:. 1397:. 1371:. 1348:. 1326:. 1300:. 1274:. 1248:. 1219:. 1173:. 1147:. 1121:. 1099:. 1069:. 1043:. 1009:: 982:. 956:. 928:. 902:. 877:. 843:. 817:. 791:. 765:. 733:. 701:. 679:. 653:. 627:. 594:. 527:) 49:/

Index

Indian Penal Code
sedition
British Raj
British government of India
Khilafat movement
Wahabi
Waliullah
political dissent
independence
Lokmanya Tilak
Mahatma Gandhi
free speech
cognisable offence
Indira Gandhi
police warrant
Supreme Court of India
Amit Shah
Thomas Babington Macaulay
James Fitzjames Stephen
Wahabi activities
1973 Code of Criminal Procedure
Supreme Court of India
bail
Calcutta High Court
Bengali
Age of Consent Act, 1891
William Comer Petheram
Lokmanya Tilak
Marathi
Pune

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑