371: (1969) ("When an arrest is made, it is reasonable for the arresting officer to search the person arrested in order to remove any weapons that the latter might seek to use in order to resist arrest or effect his escape. Otherwise, the officer's safety might well be endangered, and the arrest itself frustrated. In addition, it is entirely reasonable for the arresting officer to search for and seize any evidence on the arrestee's person in order to prevent its concealment or destruction. And the area into which an arrestee might reach in order to grab a weapon or evidentiary items must, of course, be governed by a like rule. A gun on a table or in a drawer in front of someone who is arrested can be as dangerous to the arresting officer as one concealed in the clothing of the person arrested. There is ample justification, therefore, for a search of the arrestee's person and the area 'within his immediate control'—construing that phrase to mean the area from within which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence.").
185:(2009) – The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement officers can search automobiles following arrest only if the person arrested "could have accessed his car at the time of the search." In other words, if the person arrested could conceivably reach into his car for a weapon, then a search based on officer safety is permitted. Otherwise, the old practice of allowing officers to "search incident to arrest" is no longer allowed, unless the police have reason to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest.
710:
232:
tests are permissible under the fourth amendment given that impact on privacy is "slight" while more intrusive blood tests involving piercing the skin are not. In the opinion of the court, the court states that "there must be a limit to the consequences to which motorists may be deemed to have
200:(2013) The United States Supreme Court ruled that police must generally obtain a warrant before subjecting a drunken-driving suspect to a blood test, and that the natural metabolism of blood alcohol does not establish a per se exigency that would justify a blood draw without consent.
135:(1969), the Court further limited the exception to the person arrested and the area within their immediate control "in order to remove any weapons that the might seek to use in order to resist arrest or effect his escape" and to prevent the "concealment or destruction" of evidence.
150:(1973) – The U.S. Supreme Court held that "in the case of a lawful custodial arrest a full search of the person is not only an exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment, but is also a reasonable search under that Amendment."
169:
in conjunction with an in-home arrest when the searching officer possesses a reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to those on the arrest
103:
held that a law enforcement officer was permitted to perform a warrantless search during or immediately after a lawful arrest of the arrestee and their premises, regardless of what the arrest was for.
588:
78:
581:
237:
laws and "that motorists could be deemed to have consented to only those conditions that are 'reasonable' in that they have a 'nexus' to the privilege of driving".
574:
213:
59:
66:
person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of
496:
842:
55:
900:
475:
Aaronson, David E.; Wallace, Rangeley (1976). "A Reconsideration of the Fourth
Amendment's Doctrine of Search Incident to Arrest".
923:
869:
969:
208:(2014) – The U.S. Supreme Court held that "police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital information on a
291:
342:
225:
115:
100:
220:
382:
146:
801:
938:
247:
943:
811:
606:
477:
749:
119:(1950), the court narrowed its ruling to searches of the area within the arrestee's "immediate control."
918:
789:
754:
666:
641:
362:
131:
50:
806:
368:
348:
271:
204:
196:
491:
734:
726:
676:
646:
636:
597:
513:
388:
27:
U.S. legal rule allowing a police officer to search a lawfully arrested person without a warrant
446:
933:
885:
759:
744:
681:
555:
277:
526:
671:
505:
161:
854:
848:
656:
651:
427:
234:
181:
165:(1990) – The U.S. Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment permits a properly limited
433:
17:
895:
795:
686:
661:
631:
626:
401:
166:
74:
963:
778:
566:
890:
864:
316:
229:
546:
Koehl, E. J. Jr. (1969). "Criminal
Procedure—Search Incident to a Lawful Arrest".
81:
is required to perform a lawful search; an exception to this requirement is SITA.
905:
832:
827:
767:
709:
948:
837:
784:
772:
715:
705:
696:
317:"Harris v. United States, 331 U.S. 145, 67 S. Ct. 1098, 91 L. Ed. 1399 (1947)"
209:
559:
216:
is present, police may not search an arrestee's cell phone without a warrant.
212:
seized from an individual who has been arrested." In other words, unless an
928:
67:
691:
615:
517:
492:"The Court's 'Two Model' Approach to the Fourth Amendment: Carpe Diem!"
621:
405:
63:
509:
233:
consented by virtue of a decision to drive on public roads" under
859:
739:
570:
292:"The Origins of the 'Search Incident to Arrest' Exception"
878:
820:
725:
605:
447:"Birchfield v. North Dakota, Opinion of the Court"
527:"The Physical Computer and the Fourth Amendment"
224:(2016) - The U.S. Supreme Court held that for
582:
8:
436: (United States Supreme Court 2009).
391: (United States Supreme Court 1973).
280: (United States Supreme Court 2014).
589:
575:
567:
54:), is a U.S. legal principle that allows
497:Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
452:. pp. 33, 36–37 (38, 41–42 of pdf)
402:"Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990)"
265:
263:
259:
7:
31:Search incident to a lawful arrest
25:
901:Evidence law in the United States
708:
534:Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law
290:Kerr, Orin (14 December 2010).
755:Deferred prosecution agreement
1:
343:United States v. Rabinowitz
228:investigations warrantless
226:driving under the influence
116:United States v. Rabinowitz
101:United States Supreme Court
986:
490:Bradley, Craig M. (1993).
221:Birchfield v. North Dakota
914:
870:Presentence investigation
703:
383:United States v. Robinson
147:United States v. Robinson
35:search incident to arrest
18:Search incident to arrest
525:Goldfoot, Josh (2011).
248:Information privacy law
97:Harris v. United States
812:Statute of limitations
607:Criminal investigation
478:Georgetown Law Journal
970:Searches and seizures
750:Criminal jurisdiction
790:Inquisitorial system
727:Criminal prosecution
667:Reasonable suspicion
642:Exigent circumstance
434:556 U.S. 332
389:414 U.S. 218
369:395 U.S. 752
363:Chimel v. California
214:exigent circumstance
132:Chimel v. California
51:Chimel v. California
33:, commonly known as
807:Preliminary hearing
349:339 U.S. 56
272:Riley v. California
205:Riley v. California
197:Missouri v. McNeely
735:Adversarial system
677:Search and seizure
647:Knock-and-announce
598:Criminal procedure
60:warrantless search
957:
956:
939:Wikimedia Commons
886:Criminal defenses
821:Charges and pleas
745:Bill of attainder
682:Search of persons
548:Loyola Law Review
296:Volokh Conspiracy
73:In most cases, a
16:(Redirected from
977:
718:
713:
712:
672:Right to silence
591:
584:
577:
568:
563:
541:
531:
521:
486:
462:
461:
459:
457:
451:
443:
437:
431:
423:
417:
416:
414:
412:
398:
392:
386:
378:
372:
366:
358:
352:
346:
338:
332:
331:
329:
327:
313:
307:
306:
304:
302:
287:
281:
275:
267:
167:protective sweep
162:Maryland v. Buie
85:Related case law
79:Fourth Amendment
77:pursuant to the
21:
985:
984:
980:
979:
978:
976:
975:
974:
960:
959:
958:
953:
910:
874:
855:Peremptory plea
849:Nolo contendere
816:
721:
714:
707:
701:
657:Pretextual stop
652:Miranda warning
601:
600:(investigation)
595:
545:
529:
524:
510:10.2307/1143960
489:
474:
471:
469:Further reading
466:
465:
455:
453:
449:
445:
444:
440:
428:Arizona v. Gant
425:
424:
420:
410:
408:
400:
399:
395:
380:
379:
375:
360:
359:
355:
340:
339:
335:
325:
323:
315:
314:
310:
300:
298:
289:
288:
284:
269:
268:
261:
256:
244:
235:implied consent
192:
182:Arizona v. Gant
177:
157:
142:
126:
110:
92:
87:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
983:
981:
973:
972:
962:
961:
955:
954:
952:
951:
946:
941:
936:
931:
926:
921:
915:
912:
911:
909:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
882:
880:
876:
875:
873:
872:
867:
862:
857:
852:
845:
840:
835:
830:
824:
822:
818:
817:
815:
814:
809:
804:
799:
796:Nolle prosequi
792:
787:
782:
775:
770:
765:
757:
752:
747:
742:
737:
731:
729:
723:
722:
720:
719:
704:
702:
700:
699:
694:
689:
687:Search warrant
684:
679:
674:
669:
664:
662:Probable cause
659:
654:
649:
644:
639:
634:
632:Consent search
629:
627:Arrest warrant
624:
619:
611:
609:
603:
602:
596:
594:
593:
586:
579:
571:
565:
564:
543:
522:
504:(3): 429–461.
487:
470:
467:
464:
463:
438:
418:
393:
373:
353:
333:
308:
282:
258:
257:
255:
252:
251:
250:
243:
240:
239:
238:
217:
201:
191:
188:
187:
186:
176:
173:
172:
171:
156:
153:
152:
151:
141:
138:
137:
136:
125:
122:
121:
120:
109:
106:
105:
104:
91:
88:
86:
83:
75:search warrant
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
982:
971:
968:
967:
965:
950:
947:
945:
942:
940:
937:
935:
932:
930:
927:
925:
922:
920:
917:
916:
913:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
883:
881:
879:Related areas
877:
871:
868:
866:
863:
861:
858:
856:
853:
851:
850:
846:
844:
841:
839:
836:
834:
831:
829:
826:
825:
823:
819:
813:
810:
808:
805:
803:
800:
798:
797:
793:
791:
788:
786:
783:
781:
780:
779:Habeas corpus
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
764:
762:
761:Ex post facto
758:
756:
753:
751:
748:
746:
743:
741:
738:
736:
733:
732:
730:
728:
724:
717:
711:
706:
698:
695:
693:
690:
688:
685:
683:
680:
678:
675:
673:
670:
668:
665:
663:
660:
658:
655:
653:
650:
648:
645:
643:
640:
638:
635:
633:
630:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
617:
613:
612:
610:
608:
604:
599:
592:
587:
585:
580:
578:
573:
572:
569:
561:
557:
553:
549:
544:
540:(1): 112–167.
539:
535:
528:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
499:
498:
493:
488:
484:
480:
479:
473:
472:
468:
448:
442:
439:
435:
430:
429:
422:
419:
407:
403:
397:
394:
390:
385:
384:
377:
374:
370:
365:
364:
357:
354:
350:
345:
344:
337:
334:
322:
318:
312:
309:
297:
293:
286:
283:
279:
274:
273:
266:
264:
260:
253:
249:
246:
245:
241:
236:
231:
227:
223:
222:
218:
215:
211:
207:
206:
202:
199:
198:
194:
193:
189:
184:
183:
179:
178:
174:
168:
164:
163:
159:
158:
154:
149:
148:
144:
143:
139:
134:
133:
128:
127:
123:
118:
117:
112:
111:
107:
102:
98:
94:
93:
89:
84:
82:
80:
76:
71:
69:
65:
61:
58:to perform a
57:
53:
52:
47:
45:
40:
36:
32:
19:
891:Criminal law
865:Plea bargain
847:
802:Precognition
794:
777:
760:
614:
551:
547:
537:
533:
501:
495:
482:
476:
454:. Retrieved
441:
426:
421:
409:. Retrieved
396:
381:
376:
361:
356:
351: (1950).
341:
336:
324:. Retrieved
320:
311:
301:11 September
299:. Retrieved
295:
285:
278:573 U.S.
270:
230:breathalyzer
219:
203:
195:
180:
160:
145:
130:
114:
99:(1947), the
96:
72:
49:
43:
42:
38:
34:
30:
29:
949:Wikiversity
906:Legal abuse
843:Information
833:Arraignment
828:Alford plea
768:Extradition
456:2 September
934:WikiSource
919:Wiktionary
838:Indictment
785:Indictment
773:Grand jury
716:Law portal
697:Terry stop
254:References
210:cell phone
929:Wikiquote
924:Wikibooks
637:Detention
560:0192-9720
41:) or the
964:Category
944:Wikinews
896:Evidence
411:15 March
321:Casetext
242:See also
68:evidence
64:arrested
692:Suspect
616:Arguido
554:: 217.
518:1143960
622:Arrest
558:
516:
432:,
406:Justia
387:,
367:,
347:,
326:5 July
276:,
170:scene.
62:of an
56:police
48:(from
44:Chimel
530:(PDF)
514:JSTOR
485:: 53.
450:(PDF)
190:2010s
175:2000s
155:1990s
140:1970s
124:1960s
108:1950s
90:1940s
860:Plea
740:Bail
556:ISSN
458:2017
413:2019
328:2024
303:2017
46:rule
39:SITA
763:law
506:doi
129:In
113:In
95:In
966::
552:16
550:.
538:16
536:.
532:.
512:.
502:84
500:.
494:.
483:64
481:.
404:.
319:.
294:.
262:^
70:.
590:e
583:t
576:v
562:.
542:}
520:.
508::
460:.
415:.
330:.
305:.
37:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.