Knowledge (XXG)

Selective prosecution

Source 📝

25: 1386: 1406: 181:"retain 'broad discretion' to enforce the Nation's criminal laws" and that "in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties." Therefore, the defendant must present "clear evidence to the contrary", which demonstrates "the federal prosecutorial policy 'had a discriminatory effect and that it was motivated by a discriminatory purpose.'" 166:
has defined the term as: "A selective prosecution claim is not a defense on the merits to the criminal charge itself, but an independent assertion that the prosecutor has brought the charge for reasons forbidden by the Constitution." The defense is rarely successful; some authorities claim, for
118:. In claims of selective prosecution, defendants essentially argue that it is irrelevant whether they are guilty of violating a law, but that the fact of being prosecuted is based upon forbidden reasons. Such a claim might, for example, entail an argument that persons of different age, 425: 185: 147: 167:
example, that there are no reported cases in at least the past century in which a court dismissed a criminal prosecution because the defendant had been targeted based on race. In
418: 130:, or political alignment, were engaged in the same illegal acts for which the defendant is being tried yet were not prosecuted, and that the defendant is being prosecuted 1273: 1211: 35: 981: 411: 439: 1372: 1226: 1360: 521: 1149: 799: 398: 381: 367: 174: 119: 1221: 1216: 974: 503: 1447: 163: 1298: 1252: 69: 967: 831: 1278: 526: 51: 1466: 599: 473: 228: 169: 47: 855: 1171: 543: 403: 248: 1344: 1144: 1004: 700: 337: 1339: 1303: 1257: 1188: 435: 847: 1440: 1104: 990: 919: 178: 1329: 1183: 1029: 1024: 807: 481: 207: 202: 815: 1324: 1283: 1203: 839: 769: 752: 615: 1039: 879: 863: 823: 720: 1471: 1366: 1231: 903: 887: 761: 681: 661: 91: 1433: 1247: 1176: 1166: 1161: 1132: 1094: 1069: 1064: 1014: 1009: 911: 728: 607: 465: 394: 377: 363: 1417: 1334: 1288: 1139: 1127: 1099: 1034: 895: 623: 197: 107: 871: 159: 99: 234: 1156: 1119: 1089: 1084: 1074: 791: 777: 323: 317: 282: 111: 1460: 303: 143: 83: 1319: 1059: 386: 155: 1405: 1385: 1109: 1390: 1079: 1054: 1049: 1044: 151: 115: 95: 1293: 959: 123: 1193: 127: 184:
Selective prosecution has been raised as a possible defense in the
338:"Judge Sets Trial Date in March for Trump's Federal Election Case" 938:
interpreted the Impartial Jury Clause of the Sixth Amendment. **
16:
Legal defense based on claiming the prosecutor is discriminatory
963: 500: 451: 407: 1413: 103: 18: 34:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
391:
The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity, and Crime in America
306:, 14–15 (Supreme Court of the United States 1926). 326:, 456 (Supreme Court of the United States 1962). 285:, 382 (Supreme Court of the United States 1982). 1421: 374:
Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor
43: 1353: 1312: 1266: 1240: 1202: 1118: 997: 751: 692: 535: 514: 237: (Supreme Court of the United States 1996). 1274:Race in the United States criminal justice system 1212:List of wrongful convictions in the United States 249:"Unexplainable on Grounds of Race: Doubts About 1373:List of death row inmates in the United States 98:argue that they should not be held criminally 1441: 975: 419: 336:Feuer, Alan; Thrush, Glenn (28 August 2023). 32:The examples and perspective in this article 8: 1227:Overturned convictions in the United States 1448: 1434: 982: 968: 960: 511: 497: 448: 426: 412: 404: 299:United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc. 186:election obstruction case of Donald Trump 70:Learn how and when to remove this message 293: 291: 1361:Capital punishment in the United States 522:Racial discrimination in jury selection 219: 800:Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company 389:, Samuel Walker & Miriam Delone, 134:because of a bias as to that class. 7: 1402: 1400: 1222:List of miscarriage of justice cases 1217:List of exonerated death row inmates 173:(1996), the Supreme Court ruled the 150:, which stipulates, "nor shall any 1420:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 1299:Ineffective assistance of counsel 1253:National Registry of Exonerations 260:University of Illinois Law Review 146:, this defense is based upon the 1404: 1384: 23: 832:J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. 154:deny to any person within its 1: 708:Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. 527:Women in United States juries 162:protection of the laws." The 693:Fair cross-section in venire 587:Brownfield v. South Carolina 114:against them by choosing to 1279:Innocent prisoner's dilemma 46:, discuss the issue on the 1488: 1399: 600:Franklin v. South Carolina 536:Racial exclusion in venire 474:United States v. Armstrong 362:(New Press rev. ed. 2008) 229:United States v. Armstrong 170:United States v. Armstrong 1381: 1172:Eyewitness identification 544:Strauder v. West Virginia 510: 496: 460: 447: 247:Chin, Gabriel J. (2008). 1345:Innocence Protection Act 1005:Prosecutorial misconduct 714:Ballard v. United States 701:Glasser v. United States 278:United States v. Goodwin 1340:Equal Protection Clause 1258:Investigating Innocence 1189:Tampering with evidence 179:United States Attorneys 1416:-related article is a 1105:Spoliation of evidence 991:Miscarriage of justice 920:Flowers v. Mississippi 1330:Right to a fair trial 1184:Misinformation effect 1030:Selective enforcement 1025:Malicious prosecution 1020:Selective prosecution 856:Johnson v. California 848:Miller-El v. Cockrell 808:Hernandez v. New York 753:Peremptory challenges 643:Patton v. Mississippi 563:Gibson v. Mississippi 482:United States v. Bass 454:Selective prosecution 208:Selective enforcement 203:Malicious prosecution 88:selective prosecution 1325:Exculpatory evidence 1304:Prosecutor's fallacy 1284:Blue wall of silence 1267:Contributing factors 1204:Wrongful convictions 770:Griffith v. Kentucky 669:Eubanks v. Louisiana 616:Patterson v. Alabama 569:Smith v. Mississippi 324:368 U.S. 448 283:457 U.S. 368 235:517 U.S. 456 138:In the United States 52:create a new article 44:improve this article 1050:Abuse of discretion 1040:Attorney misconduct 998:Types of misconduct 880:Snyder v. Louisiana 864:Miller-El v. Dretke 824:Georgia v. McCollum 736:Holland v. Illinois 721:Taylor v. Louisiana 581:Tarrance v. Florida 1367:Batson v. Kentucky 1313:Norms and remedies 1232:Wrongful execution 1150:Child sexual abuse 904:Felkner v. Jackson 888:Rivera v. Illinois 762:Batson v. Kentucky 682:Vasquez v. Hillery 675:Coleman v. Alabama 662:Hernandez v. Texas 502:Discrimination in 440:criminal procedure 342:The New York Times 304:272 U.S. 1 164:U.S. Supreme Court 92:procedural defense 1467:Criminal defenses 1429: 1428: 1397: 1396: 1248:Innocence Project 1177:Cross-race effect 1167:Eyewitness memory 1162:Mistaken identity 1133:Forced confession 1095:Witness tampering 1070:Legal malpractice 1065:Gaming the system 1015:Police corruption 1010:Police misconduct 957: 956: 953: 952: 946:were civil cases. 930: 929: 912:Foster v. Chatman 742:Berghuis v. Smith 729:Duren v. Missouri 608:Norris v. Alabama 593:Rogers v. Alabama 551:Virginia v. Rives 492: 491: 466:McCleskey v. Kemp 399:978-0-534-62446-0 382:978-0-19-517736-7 368:978-1-56584-947-1 102:for breaking the 80: 79: 72: 54:, as appropriate. 1479: 1450: 1443: 1436: 1408: 1401: 1389: 1388: 1354:Related concepts 1335:Actual innocence 1289:Racial profiling 1140:False accusation 1128:False confession 1100:Brady disclosure 1035:Abuse of process 984: 977: 970: 961: 896:Thaler v. Haynes 816:Trevino v. Texas 655:Avery v. Georgia 649:Cassell v. Texas 624:Hale v. Kentucky 557:Neal v. Delaware 512: 498: 449: 436:equal protection 428: 421: 414: 405: 360:No Equal Justice 346: 345: 333: 327: 321: 313: 307: 301: 295: 286: 280: 274: 268: 267: 257: 244: 238: 232: 224: 198:Equal protection 175:Attorney General 108:criminal justice 75: 68: 64: 61: 55: 27: 26: 19: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1398: 1393: 1383: 1377: 1349: 1308: 1262: 1236: 1198: 1114: 993: 988: 958: 949: 926: 872:Rice v. Collins 840:Purkett v. Elem 785:Ford v. Georgia 747: 688: 575:Carter v. Texas 531: 506: 488: 456: 443: 432: 355: 353:Further reading 350: 349: 335: 334: 330: 315: 314: 310: 297: 296: 289: 276: 275: 271: 266:(5): 1359–1392. 255: 246: 245: 241: 226: 225: 221: 216: 194: 140: 76: 65: 59: 56: 41: 28: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1485: 1483: 1475: 1474: 1469: 1459: 1458: 1453: 1452: 1445: 1438: 1430: 1427: 1426: 1409: 1395: 1394: 1391:Law portal 1382: 1379: 1378: 1376: 1375: 1370: 1363: 1357: 1355: 1351: 1350: 1348: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1316: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1307: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1270: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1261: 1260: 1255: 1250: 1244: 1242: 1238: 1237: 1235: 1234: 1229: 1224: 1219: 1214: 1208: 1206: 1200: 1199: 1197: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1169: 1164: 1159: 1157:Police perjury 1154: 1153: 1152: 1147: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1124: 1122: 1120:False evidence 1116: 1115: 1113: 1112: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1092: 1090:Jury tampering 1087: 1085:Sharp practice 1082: 1077: 1075:Kangaroo court 1072: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1047: 1042: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1022: 1017: 1012: 1007: 1001: 999: 995: 994: 989: 987: 986: 979: 972: 964: 955: 954: 951: 950: 948: 947: 931: 928: 927: 925: 924: 916: 908: 900: 892: 884: 876: 868: 860: 852: 844: 836: 828: 820: 812: 804: 796: 792:Powers v. Ohio 788: 782: 778:Teague v. Lane 774: 766: 757: 755: 749: 748: 746: 745: 739: 733: 725: 717: 711: 705: 696: 694: 690: 689: 687: 686: 678: 672: 666: 658: 652: 646: 640: 634: 631:Smith v. Texas 628: 620: 612: 604: 596: 590: 584: 578: 572: 566: 560: 554: 548: 539: 537: 533: 532: 530: 529: 524: 518: 516: 508: 507: 504:jury selection 501: 494: 493: 490: 489: 487: 486: 478: 470: 461: 458: 457: 452: 445: 444: 434:United States 433: 431: 430: 423: 416: 408: 402: 401: 384: 376:(Oxford 2007) 372:Angela Davis, 370: 354: 351: 348: 347: 328: 318:Oyler v. Boles 308: 287: 269: 239: 218: 217: 215: 212: 211: 210: 205: 200: 193: 190: 148:14th Amendment 139: 136: 78: 77: 38:of the subject 36:worldwide view 31: 29: 22: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1484: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1465: 1464: 1462: 1451: 1446: 1444: 1439: 1437: 1432: 1431: 1425: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1410: 1407: 1403: 1392: 1387: 1380: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1368: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1356: 1352: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1328: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1317: 1315: 1311: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1290: 1287: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1272: 1271: 1269: 1265: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1245: 1243: 1239: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1225: 1223: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1207: 1205: 1201: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1187: 1185: 1182: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1160: 1158: 1155: 1151: 1148: 1146: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1138: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1126: 1125: 1123: 1121: 1117: 1111: 1108: 1106: 1103: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1091: 1088: 1086: 1083: 1081: 1078: 1076: 1073: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1063: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1000: 996: 992: 985: 980: 978: 973: 971: 966: 965: 962: 945: 941: 937: 933: 932: 922: 921: 917: 914: 913: 909: 906: 905: 901: 898: 897: 893: 890: 889: 885: 882: 881: 877: 874: 873: 869: 866: 865: 861: 858: 857: 853: 850: 849: 845: 842: 841: 837: 834: 833: 829: 826: 825: 821: 818: 817: 813: 810: 809: 805: 802: 801: 797: 794: 793: 789: 786: 783: 780: 779: 775: 772: 771: 767: 764: 763: 759: 758: 756: 754: 750: 743: 740: 737: 734: 731: 730: 726: 723: 722: 718: 715: 712: 709: 706: 703: 702: 698: 697: 695: 691: 684: 683: 679: 676: 673: 670: 667: 664: 663: 659: 656: 653: 650: 647: 644: 641: 638: 637:Hill v. Texas 635: 632: 629: 626: 625: 621: 618: 617: 613: 610: 609: 605: 602: 601: 597: 594: 591: 588: 585: 582: 579: 576: 573: 570: 567: 564: 561: 558: 555: 552: 549: 546: 545: 541: 540: 538: 534: 528: 525: 523: 520: 519: 517: 513: 509: 505: 499: 495: 484: 483: 479: 476: 475: 471: 468: 467: 463: 462: 459: 455: 450: 446: 441: 437: 429: 424: 422: 417: 415: 410: 409: 406: 400: 396: 392: 388: 385: 383: 379: 375: 371: 369: 365: 361: 357: 356: 352: 343: 339: 332: 329: 325: 320: 319: 312: 309: 305: 300: 294: 292: 288: 284: 279: 273: 270: 265: 261: 254: 252: 243: 240: 236: 231: 230: 223: 220: 213: 209: 206: 204: 201: 199: 196: 195: 191: 189: 187: 182: 180: 176: 172: 171: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 144:United States 137: 135: 133: 129: 125: 121: 117: 113: 112:discriminated 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84:jurisprudence 74: 71: 63: 53: 49: 45: 39: 37: 30: 21: 20: 1422:expanding it 1411: 1365: 1320:Legal ethics 1060:False arrest 1019: 943: 939: 935: 918: 910: 902: 894: 886: 878: 870: 862: 854: 846: 838: 830: 822: 814: 806: 798: 790: 784: 776: 768: 760: 741: 735: 727: 719: 713: 707: 699: 680: 674: 668: 660: 654: 648: 642: 636: 630: 622: 614: 606: 598: 592: 586: 580: 574: 568: 562: 556: 550: 542: 480: 472: 464: 453: 390: 387:Cassia Spohn 373: 359: 358:David Cole, 341: 331: 316: 311: 298: 277: 272: 263: 259: 250: 242: 227: 222: 183: 168: 156:jurisdiction 141: 132:specifically 131: 106:because the 87: 81: 66: 57: 33: 1110:Civil wrong 60:August 2024 1461:Categories 1080:Show trial 1055:Entrapment 1045:Bad apples 214:References 96:defendants 1472:Law stubs 116:prosecute 94:in which 48:talk page 1294:Loophole 1241:Advocacy 944:Edmonson 803:(1991)** 710:(1946)** 442:case law 192:See also 124:religion 42:You may 1194:Frameup 936:Glasser 704:(1942)* 515:History 393:(2006) 251:Yick Wo 142:In the 126:, sex, 110:system 923:(2019) 915:(2015) 907:(2011) 899:(2010) 891:(2009) 883:(2008) 875:(2006) 867:(2005) 859:(2005) 851:(2003) 843:(1995) 835:(1994) 827:(1992) 819:(1992) 811:(1991) 795:(1991) 787:(1991) 781:(1989) 773:(1987) 765:(1986) 744:(2010) 738:(1990) 732:(1979) 724:(1975) 716:(1946) 685:(1986) 677:(1967) 671:(1958) 665:(1954) 657:(1953) 651:(1950) 645:(1947) 639:(1942) 633:(1940) 627:(1938) 619:(1935) 611:(1935) 603:(1910) 595:(1904) 589:(1903) 583:(1903) 577:(1900) 571:(1896) 565:(1896) 559:(1881) 553:(1880) 547:(1880) 485:(2002) 477:(1996) 469:(1987) 397:  380:  366:  322:, 302:, 281:, 233:, 128:gender 100:liable 1412:This 940:Thiel 256:(PDF) 160:equal 152:state 90:is a 50:, or 1418:stub 1145:Rape 942:and 438:and 395:ISBN 378:ISBN 364:ISBN 264:2008 177:and 158:the 120:race 1414:law 104:law 82:In 1463:: 340:. 290:^ 262:. 258:. 188:. 122:, 86:, 1449:e 1442:t 1435:v 1424:. 983:e 976:t 969:v 934:* 427:e 420:t 413:v 344:. 253:" 73:) 67:( 62:) 58:( 40:.

Index

worldwide view
improve this article
talk page
create a new article
Learn how and when to remove this message
jurisprudence
procedural defense
defendants
liable
law
criminal justice
discriminated
prosecute
race
religion
gender
United States
14th Amendment
state
jurisdiction
equal
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Armstrong
Attorney General
United States Attorneys
election obstruction case of Donald Trump
Equal protection
Malicious prosecution
Selective enforcement
United States v. Armstrong

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.