1103:
1115:
1063:
85:
objections. The lawsuit was brought by three couples, including a same-sex couple, who contended that SB 2 violated the
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They argued that the law allowed state officials to impose their religious beliefs on their duties as public servants, which could lead to discriminatory practices. U.S. District Judge
1091:
1051:
84:
was a federal lawsuit filed on
December 9, 2015, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, challenging the constitutionality of North Carolina's Senate Bill 2 (SB 2), which allowed magistrates and other public officials to refuse to perform marriages based on religious
89:
presided over the case. On
September 20, 2016, Judge Cogburn dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiffs lacked standing. He ruled that the plaintiffs had not suffered direct harm under the law, as none had been denied a marriage license or a wedding ceremony due to a magistrate's
66:
vetoed SB 2. On June 1, 2015, the North
Carolina Senate voted, with 32 ayes, 16 noes, and 2 absent, in favor of overriding the governor's veto of Senate Bill 2. On June 11, 2015, the North Carolina House of Representatives voted, with 69 ayes, 41 noes, and 10 absent, in favor of overriding the
94:
case limited further legal challenges to SB 2, as the court's decision set a precedent that plaintiffs needed to demonstrate direct harm to have standing. The law remains in effect, allowing magistrates in North
Carolina to opt out of performing marriages based on religious objections.
845:
27:
anti-LGBT law that allows for an exemption for state magistrates, assistant register of deeds, or deputy register of deeds who object to participating to issuing marriage licenses for marriages they object to "based upon any sincerely held religious objection."
325:
899:
416:
818:
1140:
850:
21:
An act to allow magistrates, assistant registers of deeds, and deputy registers of deeds to recuse themselves from performing duties related to marriage ceremonies due to sincerely held religious objection.
268:
983:
943:
198:
1034:
724:
711:
313:
42:
798:
948:
918:
840:
823:
857:
833:
862:
764:
734:
191:
273:
988:
828:
808:
754:
874:
1067:
894:
184:
1145:
867:
1160:
913:
701:
392:
382:
59:
906:
788:
337:
1024:
889:
884:
813:
803:
793:
46:
that the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples was unconstitutional, thus legalizing same-sex marriage in North
Carolina.
1155:
973:
483:
109:
1029:
978:
668:
207:
953:
719:
329:
1135:
1004:
744:
633:
598:
104:
673:
578:
538:
1150:
638:
628:
623:
603:
405:
168:
1081:
759:
553:
468:
355:
278:
156:
588:
583:
458:
321:
130:
678:
643:
548:
523:
349:
284:
663:
613:
593:
568:
558:
543:
533:
518:
498:
473:
463:
453:
411:
377:
222:
879:
683:
658:
563:
503:
478:
448:
438:
1019:
618:
573:
513:
488:
443:
387:
344:
291:
255:
242:
144:
55:
1107:
648:
528:
493:
297:
749:
653:
608:
508:
235:
37:
398:
86:
1014:
261:
693:
1119:
1009:
305:
248:
24:
1114:
1129:
925:
176:
1095:
1055:
58:
passed, with 32 ayes, 16 noes, and 2 absent, Senate Bill 2. On May 28, 2015, the
63:
62:
passed, with 67 ayes, 43 noes, and 10 absent, SB 2. On that same day, Governor
430:
159:. The Charlotte Observer, September 21, 2016. Retrieved August 12, 2024.
171:. North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 5. Retrieved August 12, 2024.
169:"The Impact of Senate Bill 2 on Marriage Equality in North Carolina"
67:
governor's veto of Senate Bill 2 and the law went into effect as
157:"Federal Judge Dismisses Suit Against NC Magistrate Recusal Law"
180:
269:
Matthew
Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act
984:
History of violence against LGBT people in the United States
944:
U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions
1141:
Discrimination against LGBTQ people in the United States
314:
Masterpiece
Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
43:
General Synod of the United Church of Christ v. Cooper
1079:
1035:
Disney and
Florida's Parental Rights in Education Act
997:
966:
949:
Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state
934:
777:
733:
710:
692:
429:
366:
221:
214:
126:
124:
36:On October 10, 2014, U.S. District Court judge
140:
138:
989:2020s anti-LGBT movement in the United States
192:
8:
851:State bans on local anti-discrimination laws
147:. CourtListener. Retrieved August 12, 2024.
781:
417:Presidential Memorandum of August 25, 2017
227:
218:
199:
185:
177:
868:Florida Parental Rights in Education Act
274:Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010
1086:
393:Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965
383:Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
120:
60:North Carolina House of Representatives
338:G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board
1025:Arnold Schwarzenegger and LGBT rights
7:
145:Ansley v. North Carolina Case Docket
974:LGBT movements in the United States
110:Same-sex marriage in North Carolina
1030:LGBT protests against Donald Trump
979:LGBTQ history in the United States
14:
208:LGBTQ rights in the United States
1113:
1101:
1089:
1062:
1061:
1049:
954:Sodomy laws in the United States
1146:LGBTQ history in North Carolina
406:DoD Directive 1304.26
1161:LGBTQ rights in North Carolina
90:recusal. The dismissal of the
1:
1005:Congressional Equality Caucus
131:Senate Bill 2 / S.L. 2015-75
105:LGBT rights in North Carolina
69:Chapter Session Law 2015-75
1177:
1156:Politics of North Carolina
356:303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
279:Violence Against Women Act
54:On February 25, 2015, the
1043:
863:Anti-LGBT curriculum laws
841:Employment discrimination
784:
408:("Don't ask, don't tell")
230:
755:Northern Mariana Islands
350:Respect for Marriage Act
285:United States v. Windsor
82:Ansley v. North Carolina
76:Ansley v. North Carolina
799:Conversion therapy bans
412:Defense of Marriage Act
378:Immigration Act of 1917
809:Housing discrimination
1136:2015 in LGBTQ history
1020:LGBT people in prison
895:Domestic partnerships
875:Public accommodations
388:Executive Order 10450
345:Executive Order 13988
292:Executive Order 13672
256:Executive Order 13087
243:Executive Order 12968
56:North Carolina Senate
40:ruled in the case of
880:Religious exemptions
702:District of Columbia
326:Harris Funeral Homes
298:Obergefell v. Hodges
19:, officially called
765:U.S. Virgin Islands
236:One, Inc. v. Olesen
50:Legislative history
38:Max O. Cogburn, Jr.
1151:North Carolina law
914:Transgender rights
834:Sexual orientation
399:Bowers v. Hardwick
87:Max O. Cogburn Jr.
1077:
1076:
1015:Save Our Children
962:
961:
773:
772:
425:
424:
262:Lawrence v. Texas
1168:
1118:
1117:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1085:
1065:
1064:
1056:LGBTQ portal
1054:
1053:
1052:
782:
694:Federal district
330:Altitude Express
228:
219:
201:
194:
187:
178:
172:
166:
160:
154:
148:
142:
133:
128:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1112:
1102:
1100:
1090:
1088:
1080:
1078:
1073:
1050:
1048:
1039:
993:
958:
936:
930:
900:by municipality
885:Same-sex unions
846:by municipality
814:Intersex rights
769:
736:
729:
706:
688:
421:
370:
368:
362:
210:
205:
175:
167:
163:
155:
151:
143:
136:
129:
122:
118:
101:
79:
52:
34:
12:
11:
5:
1174:
1172:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1148:
1143:
1138:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1122:
1110:
1098:
1075:
1074:
1072:
1071:
1059:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1010:Lavender Scare
1007:
1001:
999:
995:
994:
992:
991:
986:
981:
976:
970:
968:
964:
963:
960:
959:
957:
956:
951:
946:
940:
938:
932:
931:
929:
928:
923:
922:
921:
911:
910:
909:
904:
903:
902:
892:
882:
877:
872:
871:
870:
860:
855:
854:
853:
848:
838:
837:
836:
831:
826:
816:
811:
806:
801:
796:
794:Age of consent
791:
785:
779:
775:
774:
771:
770:
768:
767:
762:
757:
752:
747:
745:American Samoa
741:
739:
735:Unincorporated
731:
730:
728:
727:
725:Indian Country
722:
716:
714:
712:Tribal nations
708:
707:
705:
704:
698:
696:
690:
689:
687:
686:
681:
676:
671:
666:
661:
656:
651:
646:
641:
636:
634:South Carolina
631:
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
599:North Carolina
596:
591:
586:
581:
576:
571:
566:
561:
556:
551:
546:
541:
536:
531:
526:
521:
516:
511:
506:
501:
496:
491:
486:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
441:
435:
433:
427:
426:
423:
422:
420:
419:
414:
409:
403:
395:
390:
385:
380:
374:
372:
364:
363:
361:
360:
352:
347:
342:
334:
318:
310:
306:Pavan v. Smith
302:
294:
289:
281:
276:
271:
266:
258:
253:
249:Romer v. Evans
245:
240:
231:
225:
216:
212:
211:
206:
204:
203:
196:
189:
181:
174:
173:
161:
149:
134:
119:
117:
114:
113:
112:
107:
100:
97:
78:
73:
51:
48:
33:
30:
25:North Carolina
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1173:
1162:
1159:
1157:
1154:
1152:
1149:
1147:
1144:
1142:
1139:
1137:
1134:
1133:
1131:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1109:
1108:United States
1099:
1097:
1087:
1083:
1070:
1069:
1060:
1058:
1057:
1046:
1045:
1042:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1002:
1000:
996:
990:
987:
985:
982:
980:
977:
975:
972:
971:
969:
965:
955:
952:
950:
947:
945:
942:
941:
939:
933:
927:
926:Bathroom bill
924:
920:
917:
916:
915:
912:
908:
905:
901:
898:
897:
896:
893:
891:
888:
887:
886:
883:
881:
878:
876:
873:
869:
866:
865:
864:
861:
859:
856:
852:
849:
847:
844:
843:
842:
839:
835:
832:
830:
827:
825:
822:
821:
820:
817:
815:
812:
810:
807:
805:
802:
800:
797:
795:
792:
790:
787:
786:
783:
780:
776:
766:
763:
761:
758:
756:
753:
751:
748:
746:
743:
742:
740:
738:
732:
726:
723:
721:
720:Navajo Nation
718:
717:
715:
713:
709:
703:
700:
699:
697:
695:
691:
685:
682:
680:
677:
675:
674:West Virginia
672:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
657:
655:
652:
650:
647:
645:
642:
640:
637:
635:
632:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
595:
592:
590:
587:
585:
582:
580:
579:New Hampshire
577:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
560:
557:
555:
552:
550:
547:
545:
542:
540:
539:Massachusetts
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
522:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
502:
500:
497:
495:
492:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
436:
434:
432:
428:
418:
415:
413:
410:
407:
404:
401:
400:
396:
394:
391:
389:
386:
384:
381:
379:
376:
375:
373:
365:
358:
357:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
340:
339:
335:
332:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
315:
311:
308:
307:
303:
300:
299:
295:
293:
290:
287:
286:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
270:
267:
264:
263:
259:
257:
254:
251:
250:
246:
244:
241:
238:
237:
233:
232:
229:
226:
224:
220:
217:
213:
209:
202:
197:
195:
190:
188:
183:
182:
179:
170:
165:
162:
158:
153:
150:
146:
141:
139:
135:
132:
127:
125:
121:
115:
111:
108:
106:
103:
102:
98:
96:
93:
88:
83:
77:
74:
72:
70:
65:
61:
57:
49:
47:
45:
44:
39:
31:
29:
26:
22:
18:
17:Senate Bill 2
1066:
1047:
890:Civil unions
639:South Dakota
629:Rhode Island
624:Pennsylvania
604:North Dakota
402: (1986)
397:
371:federal laws
354:
336:
333: (2020)
320:
317: (2018)
312:
309: (2016)
304:
301: (2015)
296:
288: (2013)
283:
265: (2003)
260:
252: (1996)
247:
239: (1958)
234:
164:
152:
91:
81:
80:
75:
68:
53:
41:
35:
23:, is a 2015
20:
16:
15:
935:Repealed or
858:Immigration
824:Transgender
804:Hate crimes
760:Puerto Rico
737:territories
554:Mississippi
469:Connecticut
367:Repealed or
64:Pat McCrory
1130:Categories
937:overturned
669:Washington
589:New Mexico
584:New Jersey
459:California
369:overturned
116:References
32:Background
967:Movements
679:Wisconsin
644:Tennessee
549:Minnesota
524:Louisiana
215:By entity
1120:Politics
1068:Category
907:Marriage
829:Intersex
819:Military
789:Adoption
664:Virginia
614:Oklahoma
594:New York
569:Nebraska
559:Missouri
544:Michigan
534:Maryland
519:Kentucky
499:Illinois
474:Delaware
464:Colorado
454:Arkansas
99:See also
1082:Portals
998:Related
778:By type
684:Wyoming
659:Vermont
564:Montana
504:Indiana
484:Georgia
479:Florida
449:Arizona
439:Alabama
322:Bostock
223:Federal
919:voting
619:Oregon
574:Nevada
514:Kansas
489:Hawaii
444:Alaska
431:States
359:(2023)
341:(2020)
92:Ansley
1096:LGBTQ
649:Texas
529:Maine
494:Idaho
750:Guam
654:Utah
609:Ohio
509:Iowa
1132::
137:^
123:^
71:.
1084::
328:/
324:/
200:e
193:t
186:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.