29:
212:
218:
177:
She argued that the college had violated the common law tort of discrimination. The Court of Appeal for
Ontario accepted the existence of such a tort. Since Bhadauria could show that such a right existed and that it had been violated by the practices of the college she would be entitled to remedy.
186:
The Court allowed the appeal. It held that there was no tort of discrimination in
Canadian common law. The court reasoned that a tort of discrimination was unnecessary since Bhadauria already had access to the human rights regime.
310:
261:
280:
290:
295:
170:
Bhadauria, an East Indian woman, was qualified to teach in
Ontario and had seven years experience. She had applied ten times to
285:
254:
315:
305:
247:
103:
174:
but was never granted an interview. Bhadauria claimed that she was not interviewed because of her ethnicity.
300:
143:
34:
196:
28:
107:
211:
83:
231:
171:
159:
87:
274:
111:
99:
91:
50:
227:
147:
131:
Martland and
Ritchie JJ took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
76:
155:
95:
151:
235:
122:
117:
67:
59:
49:
42:
21:
255:
8:
262:
248:
154:law. The Court ruled that there can be no
142:, 2 SCR 181 is a leading decision of the
182:Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada
18:
7:
207:
205:
311:Employment discrimination case law
14:
216:
210:
27:
197:full text of decision at CanLII
281:Canadian civil rights case law
1:
291:Supreme Court of Canada cases
234:. You can help Knowledge by
16:Supreme Court of Canada case
332:
204:
139:Seneca College v Bhadauria
22:Seneca College v Bhadauria
296:1981 in Canadian case law
130:
72:
43:Hearing: May 12–13, 1981
26:
144:Supreme Court of Canada
45:Judgment: June 22, 1981
35:Supreme Court of Canada
286:Canadian tort case law
123:Unanimous reasons by
226:This article about
316:Canadian law stubs
243:
242:
135:
134:
323:
264:
257:
250:
222:
221:
220:
219:
214:
206:
108:Julien Chouinard
104:William McIntyre
81:Puisne Justices:
68:Court membership
31:
19:
331:
330:
326:
325:
324:
322:
321:
320:
306:Minority rights
271:
270:
269:
268:
217:
215:
209:
202:
193:
184:
168:
84:Ronald Martland
79:
63:Appeal allowed.
44:
38:
17:
12:
11:
5:
329:
327:
319:
318:
313:
308:
303:
301:Seneca College
298:
293:
288:
283:
273:
272:
267:
266:
259:
252:
244:
241:
240:
223:
200:
199:
192:
191:External links
189:
183:
180:
172:Seneca College
167:
164:
160:discrimination
133:
132:
128:
127:
124:
120:
119:
115:
114:
88:Roland Ritchie
74:Chief Justice:
70:
69:
65:
64:
61:
57:
56:
53:
47:
46:
40:
39:
32:
24:
23:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
328:
317:
314:
312:
309:
307:
304:
302:
299:
297:
294:
292:
289:
287:
284:
282:
279:
278:
276:
265:
260:
258:
253:
251:
246:
245:
239:
237:
233:
229:
224:
213:
208:
203:
198:
195:
194:
190:
188:
181:
179:
175:
173:
165:
163:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
140:
129:
125:
121:
118:Reasons given
116:
113:
112:Antonio Lamer
109:
105:
101:
100:Willard Estey
97:
93:
92:Brian Dickson
89:
85:
82:
78:
75:
71:
66:
62:
58:
54:
52:
48:
41:
37:
36:
30:
25:
20:
236:expanding it
228:Canadian law
225:
201:
185:
176:
169:
148:civil rights
138:
137:
136:
80:
73:
33:
77:Bora Laskin
275:Categories
166:Background
156:common law
96:Jean Beetz
126:Laskin CJ
55:2 SCR 181
51:Citations
158:tort of
60:Ruling
230:is a
232:stub
152:tort
150:and
146:on
277::
162:.
110:,
106:,
102:,
98:,
94:,
90:,
86:,
263:e
256:t
249:v
238:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
